Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -132,3 +132,208 @@ result = review_python_code(vulnerable_code)
|
|
| 132 |
print(result)
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 132 |
print(result)
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
+
Training Details
|
| 136 |
+
Training Data
|
| 137 |
+
The model was trained on a comprehensive dataset of Python code review examples covering:
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
๐ SECURITY
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
SQL Injection Prevention
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
XSS Prevention in Web Frameworks
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
Insecure Deserialization
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
Command Injection Prevention
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
JWT Token Security
|
| 152 |
+
|
| 153 |
+
Hardcoded Secrets Detection
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
Input Validation & Sanitization
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
Secure File Upload Handling
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
Broken Access Control
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
Password Hashing & Storage
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
โก PERFORMANCE
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
Algorithm Complexity Optimization
|
| 166 |
+
|
| 167 |
+
Database Query Optimization
|
| 168 |
+
|
| 169 |
+
Memory Leak Detection
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
I/O Bound Operations Optimization
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
CPU Bound Operations Optimization
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
Async/Await Performance
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
Caching Strategies Implementation
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
Loop Optimization Techniques
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
Data Structure Selection
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
Concurrent Execution Patterns
|
| 184 |
+
|
| 185 |
+
๐ PYTHONIC CODE
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
Type Hinting Implementation
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
Mutable Default Arguments
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
Context Manager Usage
|
| 192 |
+
|
| 193 |
+
Decorator Best Practices
|
| 194 |
+
|
| 195 |
+
List/Dict/Set Comprehensions
|
| 196 |
+
|
| 197 |
+
Class Design Principles
|
| 198 |
+
|
| 199 |
+
Dunder Method Implementation
|
| 200 |
+
|
| 201 |
+
Property Decorator Usage
|
| 202 |
+
|
| 203 |
+
Generator Expressions
|
| 204 |
+
|
| 205 |
+
Class vs Static Methods
|
| 206 |
+
|
| 207 |
+
Import Organization
|
| 208 |
+
|
| 209 |
+
Exception Handling & Hierarchy
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
EAFP vs LBYL Patterns
|
| 212 |
+
|
| 213 |
+
Basic syntax validation
|
| 214 |
+
|
| 215 |
+
Variable scope validation
|
| 216 |
+
|
| 217 |
+
Type Operation Compatibility
|
| 218 |
+
|
| 219 |
+
๐ง PRODUCTION RELIABILITY
|
| 220 |
+
|
| 221 |
+
Error Handling and Logging
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
Training Procedure
|
| 224 |
+
Training Hyperparameters
|
| 225 |
+
Training regime: bf16 mixed precision with QLoRA
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
Base Model: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
LoRA Rank: 32
|
| 230 |
+
|
| 231 |
+
LoRA Alpha: 64
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
LoRA Dropout: 0.1
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
Learning Rate: 2e-4
|
| 236 |
+
|
| 237 |
+
Batch Size: 16 (with gradient accumulation 4)
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
Epochs: 2
|
| 240 |
+
|
| 241 |
+
Max Sequence Length: 2048 tokens
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
Optimizer: Paged AdamW 8-bit
|
| 244 |
+
|
| 245 |
+
Speeds, Sizes, Times
|
| 246 |
+
Base Model Size: 7B parameters
|
| 247 |
+
|
| 248 |
+
Adapter Size: ~45MB
|
| 249 |
+
|
| 250 |
+
Training Time: ~68 minutes for 400 steps
|
| 251 |
+
|
| 252 |
+
Training Examples: 13,670 training, 1,726 evaluation
|
| 253 |
+
|
| 254 |
+
Evaluation
|
| 255 |
+
Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 256 |
+
Testing Data
|
| 257 |
+
Evaluation performed on held-out Python code examples from the same dataset distribution.
|
| 258 |
+
|
| 259 |
+
Metrics
|
| 260 |
+
ROUGE-L: 0.754
|
| 261 |
+
|
| 262 |
+
BLEU: 61.99
|
| 263 |
+
|
| 264 |
+
Validation Loss: 0.595
|
| 265 |
+
|
| 266 |
+
Results
|
| 267 |
+
The model achieved strong performance on code review tasks, particularly excelling at:
|
| 268 |
+
|
| 269 |
+
Security vulnerability detection (SQL injection, XSS, etc.)
|
| 270 |
+
|
| 271 |
+
Pythonic code improvements
|
| 272 |
+
|
| 273 |
+
Performance optimization suggestions
|
| 274 |
+
|
| 275 |
+
Providing corrected code examples
|
| 276 |
+
|
| 277 |
+
Summary
|
| 278 |
+
The model demonstrates excellent capability in identifying and fixing common Python code issues, with particular strength in security vulnerability detection and code quality improvements.
|
| 279 |
+
|
| 280 |
+
Environmental Impact
|
| 281 |
+
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in Lacoste et al. (2019).
|
| 282 |
+
|
| 283 |
+
Hardware Type: NVIDIA A100 or equivalent
|
| 284 |
+
|
| 285 |
+
Hours used: ~1.5 hours
|
| 286 |
+
|
| 287 |
+
Training Approach: QLoRA for efficient fine-tuning
|
| 288 |
+
|
| 289 |
+
Technical Specifications
|
| 290 |
+
Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 291 |
+
Architecture: Transformer-based causal language model
|
| 292 |
+
|
| 293 |
+
Objective: Supervised fine-tuning for code review tasks
|
| 294 |
+
|
| 295 |
+
Context Window: 32K tokens (base model)
|
| 296 |
+
|
| 297 |
+
Compute Infrastructure
|
| 298 |
+
Hardware
|
| 299 |
+
Training performed on GPU cluster with NVIDIA A100/A6000 class hardware
|
| 300 |
+
|
| 301 |
+
Software
|
| 302 |
+
Transformers, PEFT, TRL, BitsAndBytes
|
| 303 |
+
|
| 304 |
+
QLoRA for parameter-efficient fine-tuning
|
| 305 |
+
|
| 306 |
+
Citation
|
| 307 |
+
BibTeX:
|
| 308 |
+
|
| 309 |
+
bibtex
|
| 310 |
+
@misc{code_review_assistant_2024,
|
| 311 |
+
title={Code Review Assistant: A Fine-tuned Model for Python Code Analysis},
|
| 312 |
+
author={Philip, Alen},
|
| 313 |
+
year={2024},
|
| 314 |
+
publisher={Hugging Face},
|
| 315 |
+
howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model}}
|
| 316 |
+
}
|
| 317 |
+
DOI:
|
| 318 |
+
|
| 319 |
+
bibtex
|
| 320 |
+
@misc{alen_philip_george_2025,
|
| 321 |
+
author = {Alen Philip George},
|
| 322 |
+
title = {Code_Review_Assistant_Model (Revision 233d438)},
|
| 323 |
+
year = 2025,
|
| 324 |
+
url = {https://huggingface.co/alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model},
|
| 325 |
+
doi = {10.57967/hf/6836},
|
| 326 |
+
publisher = {Hugging Face}
|
| 327 |
+
}
|
| 328 |
+
Model Card Authors
|
| 329 |
+
Alen Philip
|
| 330 |
+
|
| 331 |
+
Model Card Contact
|
| 332 |
+
Hugging Face: alenphilip
|
| 333 |
+
|
| 334 |
+
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/alen-philip-george-130226254
|
| 335 |
+
|
| 336 |
+
Email: alenphilipgeorge@gmail.com
|
| 337 |
+
|
| 338 |
+
|
| 339 |
+
For questions about this model, please use the Hugging Face model repository discussions or contact via the above channels.
|