--- language: en license: mit library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: question-answering base_model: valhalla/longformer-base-4096-finetuned-squadv1 datasets: - allenai/qasper tags: - longformer - question-answering - long-document-qa - qasper - document-ai --- # Longformer QASPER Extractive Document QA This model card is the upload template for the checkpoint produced by `notebooks/complete_longformer_training_evaluation_pipeline.ipynb`. ## Base model `valhalla/longformer-base-4096-finetuned-squadv1` ## Project fine-tuning The checkpoint is further fine-tuned by this project on a documented subset of QASPER v0.3 containing only answerable questions with one contiguous extractive span that can be located in the reconstructed paper text. Free-form, yes/no, unanswerable, unresolved, and multi-span annotations are excluded because this model predicts one contiguous span. ## Evaluation The model was evaluated on 200 contiguous-extractive examples from the QASPER validation set. | Model | Exact Match | Token F1 | Evidence Recovery | Evidence Token Recall | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:| | BERT truncated to 512 tokens | 1.50% | 7.37% | 26.00% | 41.34% | | Base Longformer with sliding windows | 6.00% | 16.16% | 30.00% | 45.88% | | QASPER-fine-tuned Longformer | **12.50%** | **26.66%** | **49.00%** | **60.14%** | ### Training configuration - Training examples: 803 - Validation examples: 419 - Evaluation examples: 200 - Maximum training length: 3,072 tokens - Sliding-window stride: 384 tokens - Training epochs: 2 - Learning rate: 1e-5 - Precision: BF16 - GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - Fine-tuned by this project: Yes ### Performance interpretation The QASPER-fine-tuned Longformer outperformed both the truncated BERT baseline and the original SQuAD-fine-tuned Longformer checkpoint across Exact Match, token-level F1, evidence recovery, and evidence-token recall. The model remains imperfect. Exact Match is a strict metric, and QASPER questions frequently contain long, technical, and semantically complex answers. The reported values should not be interpreted as production-level reliability.