AccessPath / accessibilityamodal /verification.py
anonymous-accesspath's picture
Audited anonymous-review AccessPath release
2f382c4 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
32.4 kB
"""Auditable quality gates for accessibility 3D completion candidates.
This module deliberately records compact, inspectable evidence instead of
using an opaque free-form reasoning step. It is a *reconstruction quality*
gate, not a certification of accessibility, safety, or metric navigation.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
import cv2
import numpy as np
from PIL import Image
DECISION_ORDER = {"accept": 0, "manual_review": 1, "reject": 2}
CATEGORY_POLICIES: dict[str, dict[str, float]] = {
"stairs": {
"min_visible_image_ratio": 0.008,
"min_visible_amodal_ratio": 0.15,
"max_hidden_visible_ratio": 4.0,
"max_hidden_amodal_ratio": 0.75,
"max_obstacle_amodal_ratio": 0.75,
},
"ramp": {
"min_visible_image_ratio": 0.006,
"min_visible_amodal_ratio": 0.12,
"max_hidden_visible_ratio": 3.5,
"max_hidden_amodal_ratio": 0.72,
"max_obstacle_amodal_ratio": 0.72,
},
"walkway": {
"min_visible_image_ratio": 0.008,
"min_visible_amodal_ratio": 0.12,
"max_hidden_visible_ratio": 3.5,
"max_hidden_amodal_ratio": 0.72,
"max_obstacle_amodal_ratio": 0.72,
},
"curb_cut": {
"min_visible_image_ratio": 0.004,
"min_visible_amodal_ratio": 0.10,
"max_hidden_visible_ratio": 3.0,
"max_hidden_amodal_ratio": 0.70,
"max_obstacle_amodal_ratio": 0.70,
},
"tactile_paving": {
"min_visible_image_ratio": 0.002,
"min_visible_amodal_ratio": 0.10,
"max_hidden_visible_ratio": 3.0,
"max_hidden_amodal_ratio": 0.70,
"max_obstacle_amodal_ratio": 0.70,
},
}
def _round(value: float, digits: int = 6) -> float:
return round(float(value), digits)
def _ratio(numerator: int | float, denominator: int | float) -> float:
return float(numerator) / float(denominator) if denominator else 0.0
def _policy(category: str) -> dict[str, float]:
return CATEGORY_POLICIES.get(category, CATEGORY_POLICIES["walkway"])
def _component_stats(mask: np.ndarray) -> dict[str, Any]:
count, _, stats, _ = cv2.connectedComponentsWithStats(mask.astype(np.uint8), 8)
areas = stats[1:, cv2.CC_STAT_AREA] if count > 1 else np.empty((0,), dtype=np.int32)
total = int(mask.sum())
largest = int(areas.max()) if areas.size else 0
return {
"component_count": int(len(areas)),
"largest_component_pixels": largest,
"largest_component_fraction": _round(_ratio(largest, total)),
}
def _trace(
rule_id: str,
decision: str,
observed: Any,
expected: Any,
explanation: str,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
return {
"rule_id": rule_id,
"decision": decision,
"observed": observed,
"expected": expected,
"explanation": explanation,
}
def _worst_decision(*decisions: str) -> str:
return max(decisions, key=lambda value: DECISION_ORDER[value])
def evaluate_mask_preflight(
*,
category: str,
visible_mask: np.ndarray,
amodal_mask: np.ndarray,
hidden_mask: np.ndarray,
obstacle_mask: np.ndarray,
sam3_quality: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
reviewed_visible_metadata: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Evaluate whether masks have enough observed support for automatic 3D."""
policy = _policy(category)
input_shapes = {
"visible": list(visible_mask.shape),
"amodal": list(amodal_mask.shape),
"hidden": list(hidden_mask.shape),
"obstacle": list(obstacle_mask.shape),
}
if not (
visible_mask.shape == amodal_mask.shape == hidden_mask.shape == obstacle_mask.shape
):
return {
"decision": "reject",
"policy": policy,
"measurements": {"input_mask_shapes": input_shapes},
"audit_trace": [
_trace(
"mask_shape_consistency",
"reject",
input_shapes,
"all masks have exactly the same HxW shape",
"A gate must not resample mismatched masks, because that can silently change the claimed visible/hidden support.",
)
],
}
image_area = int(visible_mask.size)
visible_pixels = int(visible_mask.sum())
amodal_pixels = int(amodal_mask.sum())
hidden_pixels = int(hidden_mask.sum())
obstacle_pixels = int(obstacle_mask.sum())
obstacle_amodal_pixels = int((obstacle_mask & amodal_mask).sum())
visible_amodal_ratio = _ratio(visible_pixels, amodal_pixels)
hidden_visible_ratio = _ratio(hidden_pixels, max(visible_pixels, 1))
hidden_amodal_ratio = _ratio(hidden_pixels, amodal_pixels)
obstacle_amodal_ratio = _ratio(obstacle_amodal_pixels, amodal_pixels)
trace: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
sam_status = str((sam3_quality or {}).get("review_status") or "missing")
reviewed_visible_approved = bool(
reviewed_visible_metadata
and str(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("source_kind", "")) == "human_reviewed_visible_mask_only"
and str(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("review_status", "")) == "approved"
and bool(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("review_is_human", False))
and bool(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("visible_confirmed", False))
and str(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("annotator", "")).strip()
)
if reviewed_visible_metadata is not None:
trace.append(
_trace(
"reviewed_visible_mask_status",
"accept" if reviewed_visible_approved else "reject",
{
"source_kind": reviewed_visible_metadata.get("source_kind"),
"review_status": reviewed_visible_metadata.get("review_status"),
"review_is_human": bool(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("review_is_human", False)),
"visible_confirmed": bool(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("visible_confirmed", False)),
"annotator_present": bool(str(reviewed_visible_metadata.get("annotator", "")).strip()),
},
"approved, human-reviewed, visible-confirmed workspace with an annotator",
"A reviewed visible boundary can replace the SAM3 proposal only with explicit human approval and provenance."
if reviewed_visible_approved
else "The reviewed-visible workspace lacks the required approval provenance.",
)
)
if sam3_quality is not None and not reviewed_visible_approved:
category_verification = dict(sam3_quality.get("category_verification") or {})
selected_category = str(sam3_quality.get("selected_category") or "")
best_category = str(category_verification.get("best_scored_category") or "")
category_disagreement = bool(category_verification.get("category_disagreement", False))
category_ok = (
(not selected_category or selected_category == category)
and (not best_category or best_category == category)
and not category_disagreement
)
trace.append(
_trace(
"category_semantic_consistency",
"accept" if category_ok else "manual_review",
{
"requested_category": category,
"selected_category": selected_category or None,
"best_scored_category": best_category or None,
"category_disagreement": category_disagreement,
},
"selected and best-scored category agree with the requested category",
"The prompt evidence does not consistently identify the requested stairs/ramp/walkway structure; review category and support boundary."
if not category_ok
else "Prompt-category evidence is consistent with the requested support structure.",
)
)
if reviewed_visible_approved:
trace.append(
_trace(
"sam3_proposal_status",
"accept",
sam_status,
"recorded only; superseded by approved reviewed-visible mask",
"The original SAM3 proposal is retained for audit but does not override a separately approved visible target boundary.",
)
)
elif sam_status in {"reject_or_reprompt", "error"}:
trace.append(
_trace(
"sam3_review_status",
"reject",
sam_status,
"candidate_accept_after_visual_review or manual_review",
"The segmentation stage itself rejected this proposal; it must not be sent to automatic 3D generation.",
)
)
elif sam_status == "manual_review":
trace.append(
_trace(
"sam3_review_status",
"manual_review",
sam_status,
"candidate_accept_after_visual_review",
"The segmentation proposal needs human mask review before any 3D result is used.",
)
)
else:
trace.append(
_trace(
"sam3_review_status",
"accept" if sam_status == "candidate_accept_after_visual_review" else "manual_review",
sam_status,
"candidate_accept_after_visual_review",
"SAM3 status is recorded as evidence; automatic masks remain proposals rather than ground truth.",
)
)
visible_image_ratio = _ratio(visible_pixels, image_area)
for rule_id, observed, threshold, comparator, explanation in (
(
"minimum_observed_support",
visible_image_ratio,
policy["min_visible_image_ratio"],
">=",
"The observed target footprint is too small to support a stable scene-level reconstruction.",
),
(
"visible_over_amodal_support",
visible_amodal_ratio,
policy["min_visible_amodal_ratio"],
">=",
"Most of the alleged support is hidden, so the completion would be driven by hallucinated geometry rather than observed structure.",
),
(
"hidden_over_visible_support",
hidden_visible_ratio,
policy["max_hidden_visible_ratio"],
"<=",
"The hidden region is disproportionate to observed support and commonly indicates wall/railing leakage into the amodal mask.",
),
(
"hidden_over_amodal_support",
hidden_amodal_ratio,
policy["max_hidden_amodal_ratio"],
"<=",
"Automatic 3D must retain enough visible surface evidence rather than invent nearly the whole target.",
),
(
"obstacle_dominates_target",
obstacle_amodal_ratio,
policy["max_obstacle_amodal_ratio"],
"<=",
"An obstacle that occupies most of the alleged target is likely a side wall, railing, or segmentation leak rather than a compact occluder.",
),
):
passed = observed >= threshold if comparator == ">=" else observed <= threshold
trace.append(
_trace(
rule_id,
"accept" if passed else "reject",
_round(observed),
f"{comparator} {_round(threshold)}",
"Observed support satisfies the guard." if passed else explanation,
)
)
components = _component_stats(visible_mask)
fragmented = (
components["component_count"] >= 8
and components["largest_component_fraction"] < 0.35
)
trace.append(
_trace(
"visible_support_connectedness",
"manual_review" if fragmented else "accept",
components,
"largest component >= 35% when >= 8 components",
"Fragmented stair treads can be valid, but need a reviewed support boundary before surface completion."
if fragmented
else "Observed support is sufficiently connected for automatic processing.",
)
)
decision = _worst_decision(*(row["decision"] for row in trace))
return {
"decision": decision,
"policy": policy,
"measurements": {
"image_pixels": image_area,
"visible_pixels": visible_pixels,
"amodal_pixels": amodal_pixels,
"hidden_pixels": hidden_pixels,
"obstacle_pixels": obstacle_pixels,
"visible_image_ratio": _round(visible_image_ratio),
"visible_amodal_ratio": _round(visible_amodal_ratio),
"hidden_visible_ratio": _round(hidden_visible_ratio),
"hidden_amodal_ratio": _round(hidden_amodal_ratio),
"obstacle_amodal_ratio": _round(obstacle_amodal_ratio),
**components,
},
"audit_trace": trace,
}
def evaluate_geometry_structure(
category: str,
geometry_manifest: dict[str, Any] | None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Check deterministic evidence emitted by accessibilityamodal.reconstruct."""
if not geometry_manifest:
return {
"decision": "manual_review",
"measurements": {},
"audit_trace": [
_trace(
"geometry_manifest_present",
"manual_review",
False,
True,
"No deterministic geometry manifest is available yet.",
)
],
}
trace: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
expected_mode = {
"stairs": "stairs",
"ramp": "ramp",
"walkway": "walkable",
"curb_cut": "walkable",
"tactile_paving": "walkable",
}.get(category)
observed_mode = str(geometry_manifest.get("geometry_mode") or "")
trace.append(
_trace(
"geometry_category_mode_consistency",
"accept" if observed_mode == expected_mode else "manual_review",
{"requested_category": category, "geometry_mode": observed_mode or None},
f"geometry_mode={expected_mode}",
"The deterministic geometry branch does not match the requested accessibility structure."
if observed_mode != expected_mode
else "The deterministic geometry branch matches the requested structure.",
)
)
log = list(geometry_manifest.get("completion_log") or [])
plane_bands = sum(
1 for row in log if str(row.get("mode") or "").startswith("plane")
)
fallback_bands = sum(
1 for row in log if "fallback" in str(row.get("mode") or ""))
fallback_ratio = _ratio(fallback_bands, max(len(log), 1))
trace.append(
_trace(
"completion_band_support",
"reject" if fallback_ratio > 0.25 else "accept",
{"band_count": len(log), "plane_bands": plane_bands, "fallback_bands": fallback_bands, "fallback_ratio": _round(fallback_ratio)},
"fallback_ratio <= 0.25",
"Too many stair bands lacked observed points and fell back to image inpainting."
if fallback_ratio > 0.25
else "Most completion bands are supported by fitted geometry.",
)
)
hidden_pixels = int(geometry_manifest.get("hidden_pixel_count") or 0)
confidence = float(geometry_manifest.get("mean_hidden_completion_confidence") or 0.0)
hidden_confidence_decision = "accept" if hidden_pixels == 0 else "manual_review" if confidence < 0.50 else "accept"
trace.append(
_trace(
"hidden_geometry_confidence",
hidden_confidence_decision,
"not_applicable_no_hidden_region" if hidden_pixels == 0 else _round(confidence),
"not applicable when hidden_pixel_count=0; otherwise >= 0.50",
"No target surface was extrapolated, so hidden-depth confidence is not applicable."
if hidden_pixels == 0
else "Hidden depth confidence is low; do not treat the result as a publishable or navigation-ready surface."
if hidden_confidence_decision == "manual_review"
else "Hidden completion confidence meets the local visualization threshold.",
)
)
faces = int(geometry_manifest.get("mesh_faces") or 0)
trace.append(
_trace(
"mesh_nonempty",
"reject" if faces <= 0 else "accept",
faces,
"> 0",
"No mesh faces were produced." if faces <= 0 else "Mesh contains triangle faces.",
)
)
if category == "stairs":
edges = list(geometry_manifest.get("stair_edges_y") or [])
edge_confidence = float(geometry_manifest.get("stair_edge_confidence") or 0.0)
trace.append(
_trace(
"stair_repetition_evidence",
"manual_review" if len(edges) < 3 or edge_confidence < 0.45 else "accept",
{"edge_count": len(edges), "edge_confidence": _round(edge_confidence), "edge_slope": _round(float(geometry_manifest.get("stair_edge_slope") or 0.0))},
"at least 3 edges and confidence >= 0.45",
"Too little repeated tread evidence is available for a reliable stair regularization."
if len(edges) < 3 or edge_confidence < 0.45
else "Repeated stair-edge evidence supports a segmented stair prior.",
)
)
decision = _worst_decision(*(row["decision"] for row in trace))
return {
"decision": decision,
"measurements": {
"completion_band_count": len(log),
"plane_band_count": plane_bands,
"fallback_band_count": fallback_bands,
"fallback_band_ratio": _round(fallback_ratio),
"hidden_pixel_count": hidden_pixels,
"mean_hidden_completion_confidence": _round(confidence),
"mesh_faces": faces,
},
"audit_trace": trace,
}
def _foreground_measurement(path: Path) -> dict[str, float]:
image = np.asarray(Image.open(path).convert("RGB"))
foreground = np.any(image < 245, axis=2)
ys, xs = np.where(foreground)
if xs.size == 0:
return {"coverage": 0.0, "bbox_width_ratio": 0.0, "bbox_height_ratio": 0.0, "bbox_aspect_ratio": 0.0}
width_ratio = _ratio(int(xs.max() - xs.min() + 1), image.shape[1])
height_ratio = _ratio(int(ys.max() - ys.min() + 1), image.shape[0])
return {
"coverage": _round(float(foreground.mean())),
"bbox_width_ratio": _round(width_ratio),
"bbox_height_ratio": _round(height_ratio),
"bbox_aspect_ratio": _round(min(width_ratio, height_ratio) / max(width_ratio, height_ratio, 1e-6)),
}
def evaluate_full_gpu_render_contract(learned_dir: Path) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Require evidence that both learned representations were rasterized on CUDA."""
manifest_path = learned_dir / "manifest.json"
required_files = (
"sample_gaussian.gif",
"sample_mesh.gif",
"sample_multi.gif",
"multiview_contact_sheet.jpg",
"mesh.ply",
)
missing_files = [
name
for name in required_files
if not (learned_dir / name).is_file()
or (learned_dir / name).stat().st_size <= 0
]
payload: dict[str, Any] = {}
manifest_error = None
try:
value = json.loads(manifest_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
if not isinstance(value, dict):
raise ValueError("manifest root is not an object")
payload = value
except Exception as exc:
manifest_error = f"{type(exc).__name__}: {exc}"
renderer = payload.get("gpu_renderer_runtime")
validation = payload.get("render_validation")
gaussian = renderer.get("gaussian") if isinstance(renderer, dict) else None
dense_mesh = (
renderer.get("dense_mesh") if isinstance(renderer, dict) else None
)
nviews = int(payload.get("nviews") or 0)
gaussian_views = sorted(learned_dir.glob("*_gs.png"))
mesh_views = sorted(learned_dir.glob("*_mesh.png"))
contract_ok = (
manifest_error is None
and not missing_files
and isinstance(renderer, dict)
and isinstance(gaussian, dict)
and gaussian.get("available") is True
and gaussian.get("required") is True
and gaussian.get("device") == "cuda"
and gaussian.get("runtime_import_succeeded") is True
and isinstance(dense_mesh, dict)
and dense_mesh.get("available") is True
and dense_mesh.get("required") is True
and dense_mesh.get("device") == "cuda"
and dense_mesh.get("runtime_import_succeeded") is True
and dense_mesh.get("cuda_context_preflight_succeeded") is True
and renderer.get("cpu_render_fallback_allowed") is False
and renderer.get("gaussian_only_debug_mode") is False
and isinstance(validation, dict)
and validation.get("validated") is True
and validation.get("dense_mesh_rendered_on_gpu") is True
and validation.get("cpu_render_fallback_used") is False
and int(validation.get("mesh_face_count") or 0) > 0
and nviews > 0
and len(gaussian_views) == nviews
and len(mesh_views) == nviews
)
return {
"decision": "accept" if contract_ok else "reject",
"measurements": {
"manifest_error": manifest_error,
"missing_files": missing_files,
"declared_view_count": nviews,
"gaussian_view_count": len(gaussian_views),
"mesh_view_count": len(mesh_views),
"gaussian_cuda": bool(
isinstance(gaussian, dict)
and gaussian.get("device") == "cuda"
),
"dense_mesh_cuda": bool(
isinstance(dense_mesh, dict)
and dense_mesh.get("device") == "cuda"
),
"cpu_render_fallback_used": (
validation.get("cpu_render_fallback_used")
if isinstance(validation, dict)
else None
),
},
"audit_trace": [
_trace(
"full_gpu_renderer_contract",
"accept" if contract_ok else "reject",
{
"manifest_present": manifest_path.is_file(),
"missing_files": missing_files,
"gaussian_views": len(gaussian_views),
"mesh_views": len(mesh_views),
"declared_views": nviews,
},
"CUDA Gaussian and nvdiffrast mesh renders, no CPU fallback",
(
"The learned result proves both CUDA render paths and a "
"validated dense triangle mesh."
if contract_ok
else "The learned result is incomplete or does not prove the required CUDA Gaussian + dense-mesh render contract."
),
)
],
}
def evaluate_learned_multiview(
category: str,
learned_dir: Path | None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Check learned visual candidates without treating renderer coordinates as metric geometry."""
if learned_dir is None or not learned_dir.is_dir():
return {
"decision": "manual_review",
"measurements": {},
"audit_trace": [
_trace("learned_multiview_present", "manual_review", False, True, "No learned Accessibility3D multiview result is available.")
],
}
views = sorted(learned_dir.glob("*_gs.png"))
if not views:
return {
"decision": "reject",
"measurements": {},
"audit_trace": [
_trace("learned_multiview_present", "reject", False, True, "The learned 3D result has no rendered multiview evidence.")
],
}
measures = [_foreground_measurement(path) for path in views]
gpu_contract = evaluate_full_gpu_render_contract(learned_dir)
median_coverage = float(np.median([row["coverage"] for row in measures]))
median_aspect = float(np.median([row["bbox_aspect_ratio"] for row in measures]))
coverage_decision = (
"reject" if median_coverage < 0.05 else "manual_review" if median_coverage < 0.12 else "accept"
)
aspect_decision = (
"reject" if median_aspect < 0.10 else "manual_review" if median_aspect < 0.30 else "accept"
)
trace = [
*gpu_contract["audit_trace"],
_trace(
"learned_multiview_evidence_type",
"accept",
"Gaussian-splat raster previews (*_gs.png)",
"visual reconstruction evidence only",
"These views can expose a collapsed visual candidate but do not establish physical dimensions or navigability.",
),
_trace(
"multiview_foreground_coverage",
coverage_decision,
_round(median_coverage),
">= 0.12",
"The learned object occupies almost none of the rendered views and is likely an empty or fragmentary result."
if coverage_decision == "reject"
else "The object is small in the rendered views; inspect its requested scale and framing before use."
if coverage_decision == "manual_review"
else "The rendered object has adequate view coverage.",
),
_trace(
"multiview_silhouette_thickness",
aspect_decision,
_round(median_aspect),
">= 0.30",
"Most views are nearly one-dimensional, which is inconsistent with a usable support-surface candidate."
if aspect_decision == "reject"
else "The views are elongated; this can be valid for a long ramp or stair flight, but needs human geometry review."
if aspect_decision == "manual_review"
else "Rendered silhouettes have a plausible two-dimensional extent.",
),
]
mesh_measurements: dict[str, Any] = {}
mesh_path = learned_dir / "mesh.ply"
if mesh_path.is_file():
try:
import trimesh
mesh = trimesh.load(mesh_path, process=False)
extent = np.asarray(mesh.bounds[1] - mesh.bounds[0], dtype=np.float64)
minmax_ratio = float(extent.min() / max(float(extent.max()), 1e-6))
mesh_measurements = {
"vertices": int(len(mesh.vertices)),
"faces": int(len(mesh.faces)),
"extent": [_round(value) for value in extent],
"minmax_extent_ratio": _round(minmax_ratio),
"watertight": bool(mesh.is_watertight),
}
extent_decision = (
"reject" if minmax_ratio < 0.02 else "manual_review" if minmax_ratio < 0.08 else "accept"
)
trace.append(
_trace(
"mesh_near_degeneracy",
extent_decision,
_round(minmax_ratio),
">= 0.08 (manual review below); < 0.02 rejects",
"The learned mesh is almost flat in its own normalized coordinates, consistent with a degenerate fragment."
if extent_decision == "reject"
else "The learned mesh is elongated; normalized extents alone cannot distinguish a valid long ramp/staircase from a fragment."
if extent_decision == "manual_review"
else "No near-zero mesh axis was detected. This is not a physical-scale check.",
)
)
except Exception as exc: # pragma: no cover - optional mesh parsing
trace.append(_trace("mesh_near_degeneracy", "manual_review", "unavailable", ">= 0.08", f"Could not inspect learned mesh: {type(exc).__name__}"))
decision = _worst_decision(*(row["decision"] for row in trace))
return {
"decision": decision,
"measurements": {
"view_count": len(measures),
"median_foreground_coverage": _round(median_coverage),
"median_silhouette_aspect": _round(median_aspect),
"views": measures,
"mesh": mesh_measurements,
"gpu_render_contract": gpu_contract["measurements"],
},
"audit_trace": trace,
}
def mobility_interpretation(category: str, decision: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Return conservative, non-metric audience-specific interpretation."""
withheld = decision != "accept"
common = "withheld pending mask/geometry review" if withheld else "requires calibrated clearance and surface survey"
if category == "stairs":
return {
"pedestrian": common,
"blind_or_low_vision_pedestrian": "requires surveyed handrail, edge, tactile, lighting, and obstacle information; monocular 3D is insufficient",
"wheelchair": "stairs are not an accessible route; require a separately verified ramp/lift/alternate route",
"robot_or_robot_dog": "requires metric riser/tread, friction, width, and local obstacle sensing; do not execute from this visual model alone",
}
return {
"pedestrian": common,
"blind_or_low_vision_pedestrian": "requires surveyed tactile/edge/obstacle information; monocular 3D is insufficient",
"wheelchair": common,
"robot_or_robot_dog": "requires metric slope, clearance, friction, and local obstacle sensing; do not execute from this visual model alone",
}
def build_verification(
*,
sample_id: str,
category: str,
visible_mask: np.ndarray,
amodal_mask: np.ndarray,
hidden_mask: np.ndarray,
obstacle_mask: np.ndarray,
sam3_quality: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
reviewed_visible_metadata: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
geometry_manifest: dict[str, Any] | None = None,
learned_dir: Path | None = None,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Build one JSON-ready, auditable accessibility 3D verification record."""
preflight = evaluate_mask_preflight(
category=category,
visible_mask=visible_mask,
amodal_mask=amodal_mask,
hidden_mask=hidden_mask,
obstacle_mask=obstacle_mask,
sam3_quality=sam3_quality,
reviewed_visible_metadata=reviewed_visible_metadata,
)
geometry = evaluate_geometry_structure(category, geometry_manifest)
learned = evaluate_learned_multiview(category, learned_dir)
overall = _worst_decision(preflight["decision"], geometry["decision"], learned["decision"])
if geometry_manifest is None and learned_dir is None:
overall = preflight["decision"]
trace = [
*preflight["audit_trace"],
*geometry["audit_trace"],
*learned["audit_trace"],
]
return {
"schema_version": 1,
"sample_id": sample_id,
"category": category,
"decision": overall,
"gate": {
"allow_automatic_geometry": preflight["decision"] == "accept",
"allow_learned_object_3d": (
preflight["decision"] == "accept"
and geometry["decision"] == "accept"
and learned["decision"] == "accept"
),
"allow_publication": False,
"publication_note": "Human license/privacy review and calibrated geometry validation remain required.",
},
"mask_preflight": preflight,
"geometry_structure": geometry,
"learned_multiview": learned,
"mobility_interpretation": mobility_interpretation(category, overall),
"audit_trace": trace,
"recommended_action": (
"re_prompt_or_review_masks_before_3d" if preflight["decision"] != "accept"
else "review_geometry_before_release" if overall != "accept"
else "keep_as_local_visual_candidate_not_navigation_truth"
),
"limitations": [
"This is a structured reconstruction-quality gate, not chain-of-thought or a safety certification.",
"Monocular/depth-model geometry is not calibrated metric truth unless separately calibrated.",
"Do not use this record alone to control a pedestrian aid, wheelchair, robot, or robot dog.",
],
}