DECADE / scripts /llm_judge_agreement.py
anonymous-penguin's picture
Initial code release
9c60174 verified
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""LLM-as-a-judge semantic agreement over human/v5 answer pairs."""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import json
import os
import re
import time
from collections import Counter, defaultdict
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Dict, List
from openai import OpenAI
LABEL_SCORES = {
"full_agreement": 1.0,
"partial_agreement": 0.5,
"disagreement": 0.0,
"absence_mismatch": 0.0,
}
SYSTEM_PROMPT = """You are evaluating semantic agreement between two annotators' free-text answers to the same benchmark question.
You are not judging whether either answer is true against the original chat history. Judge only whether Annotator A and Annotator B give the same answer to the question.
Use these labels:
- full_agreement: Both answers express the same final answer. Minor wording differences, extra explanation, or extra session IDs/dates are okay if the answer content is equivalent.
- partial_agreement: The answers overlap on at least one key fact, but one answer is incomplete, has an extra unsupported detail, or differs on a secondary part.
- disagreement: The answers materially disagree on the main answer, count, entity, location, date, ordering, or conclusion.
- absence_mismatch: One answer says the information is unavailable/not yet/not mentioned/unsolvable while the other gives a concrete answer.
Scores:
- full_agreement = 1.0
- partial_agreement = 0.5
- disagreement = 0.0
- absence_mismatch = 0.0
Be strict about numbers, named entities, time/order constraints, and yes/no conclusions. If both answers say the information is unavailable, this is full_agreement even if one answer is much longer.
Return JSON only with this schema:
{
"label": "full_agreement|partial_agreement|disagreement|absence_mismatch",
"score": 1.0,
"rationale": "one short sentence",
"mismatch": "empty string if no mismatch; otherwise short mismatch description"
}
"""
def load_json(path: str | Path) -> Any:
with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
return json.load(f)
def append_jsonl(path: Path, row: Dict[str, Any]) -> None:
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
with open(path, "a", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.write(json.dumps(row, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
def read_existing(path: Path) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]]:
if not path.exists():
return {}
out = {}
with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
for line in f:
if not line.strip():
continue
row = json.loads(line)
out[row["question_id"]] = row
return out
def parse_json(text: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
text = text.strip()
if text.startswith("```"):
text = re.sub(r"^```(?:json)?", "", text).strip()
text = re.sub(r"```$", "", text).strip()
try:
return json.loads(text)
except json.JSONDecodeError:
start = text.find("{")
end = text.rfind("}") + 1
if start >= 0 and end > start:
return json.loads(text[start:end])
raise
def build_user_prompt(row: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
return f"""Question:
{row["question"]}
Question type:
{row["question_type"]}
Annotator A answer:
{row["v5_answer"]}
Annotator B answer:
{row["human_answer"]}
Judge whether Annotator A and Annotator B agree semantically."""
def judge_one(client: OpenAI, model: str, row: Dict[str, Any], max_retries: int = 5) -> Dict[str, Any]:
prompt = build_user_prompt(row)
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{"role": "user", "content": prompt},
],
temperature=0,
max_tokens=220,
)
content = response.choices[0].message.content or ""
parsed = parse_json(content)
label = parsed.get("label")
if label not in LABEL_SCORES:
raise ValueError(f"bad label: {label!r}; raw={content[:300]}")
score = float(parsed.get("score", LABEL_SCORES[label]))
expected = LABEL_SCORES[label]
if abs(score - expected) > 1e-6:
score = expected
return {
**row,
"judge_label": label,
"judge_score": score,
"judge_rationale": str(parsed.get("rationale", "")),
"judge_mismatch": str(parsed.get("mismatch", "")),
"judge_raw": content,
}
except Exception as exc:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
wait = min(30, 2 ** attempt)
print(f"[retry] {row['question_id']} attempt={attempt + 1}: {type(exc).__name__}: {exc}; sleep={wait}", flush=True)
time.sleep(wait)
raise RuntimeError("unreachable")
def summarize(rows: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
def group_counts(key: str) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]]:
grouped = defaultdict(list)
for row in rows:
grouped[str(row.get(key, ""))].append(row)
return {
name: {
"n": len(items),
"mean_score": sum(x["judge_score"] for x in items) / len(items),
"label_counts": dict(Counter(x["judge_label"] for x in items)),
}
for name, items in sorted(grouped.items())
}
return {
"n": len(rows),
"mean_score": sum(x["judge_score"] for x in rows) / len(rows) if rows else 0.0,
"label_counts": dict(Counter(x["judge_label"] for x in rows)),
"by_prior_category": group_counts("category"),
"by_annotator": group_counts("annotator"),
"by_question_type": group_counts("question_type"),
}
def main() -> None:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--agreement_file", default="dataset/evolv_mem_v5_submitted_v3_96_agreement.json")
parser.add_argument("--v5_file", default="dataset/evolv_mem_v5.json")
parser.add_argument("--out_jsonl", default="dataset/evolv_mem_v5_submitted_v3_96_llm_judge_gpt41.jsonl")
parser.add_argument("--out_report", default="dataset/evolv_mem_v5_submitted_v3_96_llm_judge_gpt41_report.json")
parser.add_argument("--model", default="us/azure/openai/gpt-4.1")
parser.add_argument("--base_url", default="https://inference-api.nvidia.com/v1")
parser.add_argument("--limit", type=int, default=None)
args = parser.parse_args()
api_key = os.getenv("NV_API_KEY")
if not api_key:
raise SystemExit("NV_API_KEY is not set")
agreement = load_json(args.agreement_file)
v5_by_qid = {x["question_id"]: x for x in load_json(args.v5_file)}
rows = []
for row in agreement["rows"]:
qid = row["question_id"]
v5 = v5_by_qid[qid]
rows.append(
{
"question_id": qid,
"question": v5["question"],
"question_type": row["question_type"],
"annotator": row["annotator"],
"category": row["category"],
"human_answer": row["human_answer"],
"v5_answer": row["v5_answer"],
}
)
if args.limit is not None:
rows = rows[: args.limit]
out_jsonl = Path(args.out_jsonl)
existing = read_existing(out_jsonl)
client = OpenAI(api_key=api_key, base_url=args.base_url)
completed = list(existing.values())
for idx, row in enumerate(rows, start=1):
if row["question_id"] in existing:
continue
print(f"[judge] {idx}/{len(rows)} {row['question_id']}", flush=True)
judged = judge_one(client, args.model, row)
append_jsonl(out_jsonl, judged)
completed.append(judged)
# Preserve input order in the report.
completed_by_qid = read_existing(out_jsonl)
report_rows = [completed_by_qid[row["question_id"]] for row in rows if row["question_id"] in completed_by_qid]
report = {
"created_at_utc": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"model": args.model,
"base_url": args.base_url,
"agreement_file": args.agreement_file,
"v5_file": args.v5_file,
"judge_scheme": {
"full_agreement": 1.0,
"partial_agreement": 0.5,
"disagreement": 0.0,
"absence_mismatch": 0.0,
},
"summary": summarize(report_rows),
"rows": report_rows,
}
out_report = Path(args.out_report)
out_report.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
out_report.write_text(json.dumps(report, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
print(json.dumps(report["summary"], indent=2), flush=True)
print(f"[wrote] {out_jsonl}", flush=True)
print(f"[wrote] {out_report}", flush=True)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()