Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- en
|
| 4 |
+
license: mit
|
| 5 |
+
library_name: pytorch
|
| 6 |
+
tags:
|
| 7 |
+
- computer-vision
|
| 8 |
+
- image-classification
|
| 9 |
+
- document-classification
|
| 10 |
+
- rvl-cdip
|
| 11 |
+
- resnet50
|
| 12 |
+
datasets:
|
| 13 |
+
- rvl_cdip
|
| 14 |
+
metrics:
|
| 15 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 16 |
+
- top-k-accuracy
|
| 17 |
+
pipeline_tag: image-classification
|
| 18 |
+
model-index:
|
| 19 |
+
- name: ResNet-50 Document Classifier
|
| 20 |
+
results:
|
| 21 |
+
- task:
|
| 22 |
+
type: image-classification
|
| 23 |
+
dataset:
|
| 24 |
+
type: rvl_cdip
|
| 25 |
+
name: RVL-CDIP (Test Split)
|
| 26 |
+
metrics:
|
| 27 |
+
- name: Accuracy
|
| 28 |
+
type: accuracy
|
| 29 |
+
value: 0.8846
|
| 30 |
+
- name: Top-3 Accuracy
|
| 31 |
+
type: top-k-accuracy
|
| 32 |
+
value: 0.9562
|
| 33 |
+
---
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
# Model Card for ResNet-50 Document Classifier
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
## Quick Summary
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
This model is a **ResNet-50** Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) finetuned to classify scanned document images into **16 categories** (e.g., Emails, Invoices, Resumes, Scientific Reports). It achieves **88.46% overall accuracy** on the RVL-CDIP test set and a very strong **95.62% Top-3 Accuracy**, making it highly effective for automated document triage and organization pipelines.
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
## Model Details
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
### Model Description
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
This model utilizes the standard ResNet-50 architecture designed for image classification. Instead of "reading" the text like an OCR system, it analyzes the visual layout, structure, and low-level texture features of a whole document page to determine its category (e.g., recognizing the block layout of a resume versus the dense, two-column text of a scientific report).
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
It was trained using **Transfer Learning**, starting with weights pre-trained on ImageNet and finetuning the backbone while retraining the classification head for the 16 document classes.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
- **Developed by:** Arpit ([@arpit-gour02](https://huggingface.co/arpit-gour02))
|
| 50 |
+
- **Model type:** Computer Vision (Image Classification / CNN)
|
| 51 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English (Implicitly, via the text present in the RVL-CDIP dataset images)
|
| 52 |
+
- **License:** MIT
|
| 53 |
+
- **Finetuned from model:** ResNet-50 (ImageNet weights)
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
### Model Sources
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
- **Demo (Gradio App):** [https://huggingface.co/spaces/arpit-gour02/document-classification-demo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/arpit-gour02/document-classification-demo)
|
| 58 |
+
- **Repository:** [https://huggingface.co/spaces/arpit-gour02/document-classification-demo/tree/main](https://huggingface.co/spaces/arpit-gour02/document-classification-demo/tree/main)
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
## Uses
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
### Direct Use
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
This model is specifically designed for **Document Triage and Automation Pipelines**. It is best used as an initial sorting mechanism:
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
1. **Office Automation:** Automatically routing incoming scans to the correct department folder (e.g., sending "Invoices" to Accounting, "Resumes" to HR).
|
| 67 |
+
2. **Archive Digitization:** Rapidly tagging metadata for large legacy paper archives.
|
| 68 |
+
3. **Preprocessing Filter:** Acting as a cheap, fast gatekeeper before sending documents to expensive, specialized downstream systems (e.g., only sending confirmed "Forms" to a dedicated form-extraction model).
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
This model is **not** suitable for:
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
* **Text Extraction (OCR):** It classifies the *type* of document, it does not output the text written on it.
|
| 75 |
+
* **Handwriting Recognition:** While it has a class for "Handwritten" documents, it only detects the *presence* of handwriting, it cannot read what is written.
|
| 76 |
+
* **Non-Document Images:** The model will perform poorly on natural images (photos of objects, people, landscapes).
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
Users should be aware of the following technical limitations based on evaluation analysis:
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
* **Resolution Sensitivity (The "Blur" Problem):** The model inputs are resized to `224x224`. At this low resolution, dense text pages look like blurry gray blocks. This causes significant confusion between classes defined by dense text, specifically distinguishing **Scientific Reports** from generic **File Folders**.
|
| 83 |
+
* **Visual Similarity:** The model sometimes struggles to differentiate between **Forms** and **Questionnaires**, as they share very similar visual structures (checkboxes, lines, header fields).
|
| 84 |
+
* **Dataset Bias:** The model was trained on the RVL-CDIP dataset, which consists primarily of older, grayscale, lower-quality scans. It may have lower accuracy on modern, born-digital, color PDF documents.
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
Use the code block below to load the model architecture, load your trained weights, preprocess an image, and run inference.
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
```python
|
| 91 |
+
import torch
|
| 92 |
+
from torchvision import models, transforms
|
| 93 |
+
from PIL import Image
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
# --- Setup ---
|
| 96 |
+
# 1. Define the 16 distinct classes
|
| 97 |
+
class_names = [
|
| 98 |
+
'advertisement', 'budget', 'email', 'file folder', 'form', 'handwritten',
|
| 99 |
+
'invoice', 'letter', 'memo', 'news article', 'presentation', 'questionnaire',
|
| 100 |
+
'resume', 'scientific publication', 'scientific report', 'specification'
|
| 101 |
+
]
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
# 2. Define the preprocessing transformation (Must match training!)
|
| 104 |
+
transform = transforms.Compose([
|
| 105 |
+
transforms.Resize((224, 224)),
|
| 106 |
+
transforms.ToTensor(),
|
| 107 |
+
# Standard ImageNet normalization
|
| 108 |
+
transforms.Normalize(mean=[0.485, 0.456, 0.406], std=[0.229, 0.224, 0.225])
|
| 109 |
+
])
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
# --- Model Loading ---
|
| 112 |
+
# 3. Load the ResNet-50 architecture and replace the final layer
|
| 113 |
+
model = models.resnet50(pretrained=False)
|
| 114 |
+
num_ftrs = model.fc.in_features
|
| 115 |
+
model.fc = torch.nn.Linear(num_ftrs, len(class_names))
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
# 4. Load your trained weights (ensure path is correct)
|
| 118 |
+
# Note: map_location='cpu' ensures it loads even without a GPU
|
| 119 |
+
checkpoint = torch.load("resnet50_epoch_4.pth", map_location=torch.device('cpu'))
|
| 120 |
+
# Handle potential differences in how state_dict was saved
|
| 121 |
+
state_dict = checkpoint['state_dict'] if 'state_dict' in checkpoint else checkpoint
|
| 122 |
+
model.load_state_dict(state_dict)
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
model.eval() # Set to evaluation mode
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
# --- Inference ---
|
| 127 |
+
# 5. Load and preprocess an image
|
| 128 |
+
image_path = "path_to_your_test_document.jpg"
|
| 129 |
+
image = Image.open(image_path).convert('RGB') # Ensure 3 channels
|
| 130 |
+
input_tensor = transform(image).unsqueeze(0) # Add batch dimension (B, C, H, W)
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
# 6. Predict
|
| 133 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 134 |
+
outputs = model(input_tensor)
|
| 135 |
+
probabilities = torch.nn.functional.softmax(outputs, dim=1)
|
| 136 |
+
top_prob, top_catid = torch.topk(probabilities, 1)
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
print(f"Prediction: {class_names[top_catid.item()]}")
|
| 139 |
+
print(f"Confidence: {top_prob.item()*100:.2f}%")
|
| 140 |
+
```
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
## Training Details
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
### Training Data
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
The model was trained on the **RVL-CDIP (Ryerson Vision Lab Complex Document Information Processing)** dataset.
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
* **Total Size:** 400,000 grayscale images.
|
| 151 |
+
* **Classes:** 16 perfectly balanced classes.
|
| 152 |
+
* **Split:** The standard split is 320k Train, 40k Validation, 40k Test. This model was trained on the 25,000 images per class available in the training set.
|
| 153 |
+
* **Data Handling:** Original grayscale images were converted to 3-channel RGB to match the input expectations of the pre-trained ResNet backbone.
|
| 154 |
+
|
| 155 |
+
### Training Procedure
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
#### Preprocessing
|
| 158 |
+
All images were resized to `224x224` pixels and normalized using standard ImageNet statistics (`mean=[0.485, 0.456, 0.406], std=[0.229, 0.224, 0.225]`).
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 161 |
+
The training used standard, stable hyperparameters for fine-tuning CNNs:
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
* **Optimizer:** SGD (Stochastic Gradient Descent)
|
| 164 |
+
* **Learning Rate:** 0.01
|
| 165 |
+
* **Momentum:** 0.9
|
| 166 |
+
* **Batch Size:** 64
|
| 167 |
+
* **Epochs:** 5
|
| 168 |
+
* **Training Regime:** Mixed Precision (Automatic Mixed Precision used implicitly via PyTorch for speed and memory efficiency).
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 173 |
+
|
| 174 |
+
The model was evaluated on the standard, unseen **RVL-CDIP Test Split** containing 40,000 images.
|
| 175 |
+
|
| 176 |
+
**Metrics used:**
|
| 177 |
+
* **Accuracy:** The percentage of predictions that exactly matched the ground truth.
|
| 178 |
+
* **Top-3 Accuracy:** The percentage of times the correct label appeared in the model's top three highest-probability predictions. This is often the most relevant metric for human-in-the-loop triage systems.
|
| 179 |
+
* **Precision/Recall/F1-Score:** Evaluated on a per-class basis to identify specific strengths and weaknesses in the model's performance.
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
### Results
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
| Metric | Result | Notes |
|
| 184 |
+
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
| 185 |
+
| **Overall Accuracy** | **88.46%** | Solid baseline performance. |
|
| 186 |
+
| **Top-3 Accuracy** | **95.62%** | Excellent reliability for triage tasks. |
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
#### Detailed Performance Analysis (The "Traffic Light" Report)
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
An analysis of per-class F1-scores reveals distinct tiers of performance:
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
* 🟢 **Excellent (>90% F1):** `Email`, `Resume`, `Memo`, `Handwritten`, `Specification`. The model is highly reliable for core administrative documents with distinct visual structures.
|
| 193 |
+
* 🟡 **Reliable (~85-89% F1):** `Invoice`, `Advertisement`, `News Article`, `Budget`.
|
| 194 |
+
* 🔴 **Challenging (<75% Precision):** `Scientific Report`, `Form`, `File Folder`. The major weakness is misclassifying Scientific Reports as File Folders due to resolution constraints blurring the dense text.
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
## Environmental Impact
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
The training was conducted locally on consumer-grade hardware, resulting in negligible environmental impact compared to large-scale language model training.
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
* **Hardware Type:** Apple M-Series Chip / single NVIDIA GPU
|
| 201 |
+
* **Hours used:** Approximately 5 hours (1 hour per epoch)
|
| 202 |
+
* **Carbon Emitted:** Negligible local usage.
|
| 203 |
+
|
| 204 |
+
## Technical Specifications
|
| 205 |
+
|
| 206 |
+
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 207 |
+
|
| 208 |
+
The model consists of the **ResNet-50 backbone** (a 50-layer deep Convolutional Neural Network using residual connections and bottleneck blocks) followed by a custom classification head.
|
| 209 |
+
|
| 210 |
+
* **Input Shape:** `(Batch_Size, 3, 224, 224)` (RGB Images)
|
| 211 |
+
* **Backbone Output:** 2048 feature maps of size `7x7`.
|
| 212 |
+
* **Pooling:** Global Average Pooling reduces dimensions to `(Batch_Size, 2048)`.
|
| 213 |
+
* **Classification Head:** A single fully connected linear layer mapping 2048 features to 16 class logits.
|
| 214 |
+
* **Objective:** Minimize Cross-Entropy Loss between predicted logits and ground truth class labels.
|
| 215 |
+
|
| 216 |
+
## Citation
|
| 217 |
+
|
| 218 |
+
If you use this model or the RVL-CDIP dataset, please cite the original paper:
|
| 219 |
+
|
| 220 |
+
**BibTeX:**
|
| 221 |
+
|
| 222 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 223 |
+
@inproceedings{harley2015icdar,
|
| 224 |
+
title = {Evaluation of Deep Convolutional Nets for Document Image Classification and Retrieval},
|
| 225 |
+
author = {Adam W. Harley and Alex Ufkes and Konstantinos G. Derpanis},
|
| 226 |
+
booktitle = {International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)},
|
| 227 |
+
year = {2015}
|
| 228 |
+
}
|