Text Generation
Transformers
Safetensors
English
llama
distillation
knowledge-distillation
json-extraction
structured-output
information-extraction
gemma-4
minicpm5
edge-ai
schemaforge
conversational
text-generation-inference
Instructions to use arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor", device_map="auto") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor
- SGLang
How to use arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor
Add model card, benchmark charts, technical whitepaper
Browse files- .gitattributes +4 -0
- README.md +277 -0
- SCHEMAFORGE_WHITEPAPER.md +0 -0
- SchemaForge_Whitepaper.pdf +3 -0
- graphs/accuracy_across_iterations.png +3 -0
- graphs/loss_convergence.png +3 -0
- graphs/throughput_vs_vram.png +3 -0
.gitattributes
CHANGED
|
@@ -33,3 +33,7 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
| 33 |
*.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 34 |
*.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 35 |
*tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
*.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 34 |
*.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 35 |
*tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 36 |
+
graphs/accuracy_across_iterations.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 37 |
+
graphs/loss_convergence.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 38 |
+
graphs/throughput_vs_vram.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 39 |
+
SchemaForge_Whitepaper.pdf filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- en
|
| 4 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- distillation
|
| 7 |
+
- knowledge-distillation
|
| 8 |
+
- json-extraction
|
| 9 |
+
- structured-output
|
| 10 |
+
- information-extraction
|
| 11 |
+
- gemma-4
|
| 12 |
+
- minicpm5
|
| 13 |
+
- edge-ai
|
| 14 |
+
- schemaforge
|
| 15 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
| 16 |
+
base_model: openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B
|
| 17 |
+
library_name: transformers
|
| 18 |
+
metrics:
|
| 19 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 20 |
+
- f1
|
| 21 |
+
- throughput
|
| 22 |
+
---
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
# SchemaForge-1B β JSON Extractor
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
**A 1.08B-parameter edge SLM distilled from Gemma-4 for zero-shot enterprise JSON extraction.**
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
SchemaForge-1B converts unstructured business documents β invoices, bills of lading, requisitions, receipts β into strongly-typed, schema-conformant JSON. It was distilled from **`google/gemma-4-31B`** and **`google/gemma-4-E4B-it`** into **`openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B`** using a multi-task objective combining hard cross-entropy with temperature-scaled, log-space soft-logit KL divergence ($\alpha = 0.5$, $\tau = 2.0$), trained on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Edition (96 GB).
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
| | 31B Teacher | **SchemaForge-1B** |
|
| 31 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 32 |
+
| In-domain JSON syntax error rate *(n = 5 docs)* | 0.0 % | **0.0 %** |
|
| 33 |
+
| In-domain extraction F1 *(n = 5 docs)* | 1.000 | **1.000** |
|
| 34 |
+
| Zero-shot validity (`suneeldk/text-json`) | β | **70.0 %** |
|
| 35 |
+
| Throughput | 12.40 tok/s | **61.91 β 76.27 tok/s** |
|
| 36 |
+
| Peak VRAM | β38.5 GB | **β2.4 GB** |
|
| 37 |
+
| Workers per 96 GB GPU | 2 | **36** |
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
**16.0Γ smaller Β· 5.0Γ faster Β· ~110Γ aggregate system throughput**
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
---
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
## β οΈ Read This First: The Prompt Template Is Not Optional
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
This model was distilled on **one exact prompt template**. Because it is a 1.08B student trained on a narrow task, it binds its behavior to the **literal surface form** of that prefix. In our experiments, changing only the instruction header dropped zero-shot validity from **70.0 % to 0.0 %** β worse than the *untrained* base model.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Use this string, byte for byte:
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
```python
|
| 50 |
+
TEMPLATE = "Extract structured JSON from the text:\n{doc}\nJSON Output:"
|
| 51 |
+
```
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
Do not wrap it in chat tokens. Do not prepend a system persona. Do not add a trailing newline. Treat it as a versioned API contract.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
---
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## π Benchmark Evidence
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
### 1. Throughput and VRAM
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+

|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
*Figure 1: **5.0Γ throughput speedup** (61.91 vs. 12.40 tok/s, matched harness) and **16.0Γ VRAM reduction** (β2.4 GB vs. β38.5 GB), measured on identical hardware.*
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
### 2. Zero-shot accuracy across distillation iterations
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+

|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
*Figure 2: Validity on `suneeldk/text-json`. Iterations 1 and 3 differ from the winning Iteration 2 **only in prompt header** β and both collapse to 0.0 %.*
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
### 3. Training convergence
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+

|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
*Figure 3: Loss over 3 epochs, Gemma-4-31B teacher. Iteration 2 (released): 9,132.9 β 6,962.3 β 6,612.7 (β27.6 %). Summed losses β comparable within a run, not across runs.*
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
---
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
## Quickstart
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
```python
|
| 82 |
+
import torch
|
| 83 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
model_id = "arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor"
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
|
| 88 |
+
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
|
| 89 |
+
model_id,
|
| 90 |
+
dtype=torch.bfloat16 if torch.cuda.is_available() else torch.float32,
|
| 91 |
+
).to("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
|
| 92 |
+
# No trust_remote_code needed β MiniCPM5-1B is a stock LlamaForCausalLM.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
# CANONICAL TEMPLATE β do not modify
|
| 95 |
+
prompt = (
|
| 96 |
+
"Extract structured JSON from the text:\n"
|
| 97 |
+
"INVOICE #INV-1001. Vendor: Acme Supply Co. Date: 2026-04-10. "
|
| 98 |
+
"Subtotal: $480.00. Tax (8%): $38.40. Total: $518.40.\n"
|
| 99 |
+
"JSON Output:"
|
| 100 |
+
)
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
| 103 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 104 |
+
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=128, do_sample=False)
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].size(1):],
|
| 107 |
+
skip_special_tokens=True))
|
| 108 |
+
```
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
Expected:
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
```json
|
| 113 |
+
{
|
| 114 |
+
"invoice_number": "INV-1001",
|
| 115 |
+
"vendor_name": "Acme Supply Co",
|
| 116 |
+
"invoice_date": "2026-04-10",
|
| 117 |
+
"subtotal": 480.00,
|
| 118 |
+
"tax": 38.40,
|
| 119 |
+
"grand_total": 518.40
|
| 120 |
+
}
|
| 121 |
+
```
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
---
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
## Production Serving (vLLM)
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
```python
|
| 128 |
+
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
llm = LLM(
|
| 131 |
+
model="arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor",
|
| 132 |
+
dtype="bfloat16",
|
| 133 |
+
gpu_memory_utilization=0.90,
|
| 134 |
+
max_model_len=2048,
|
| 135 |
+
max_num_seqs=36, # 36 workers fit in 96 GB at 2.4 GB each
|
| 136 |
+
)
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, max_tokens=256)
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
TEMPLATE = "Extract structured JSON from the text:\n{doc}\nJSON Output:"
|
| 141 |
+
docs = [
|
| 142 |
+
"Invoice #INV-881, Vendor: Globex Corp, Date: 2026-08-03, Total: $450.00",
|
| 143 |
+
"Invoice #INV-882, Vendor: Initech LLC, Date: 2026-08-04, Total: $1200.00",
|
| 144 |
+
]
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
for out in llm.generate([TEMPLATE.format(doc=d) for d in docs], sampling_params):
|
| 147 |
+
print(out.outputs[0].text)
|
| 148 |
+
```
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
### Recommended: layer schema-constrained decoding
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
Distillation supplies *semantics*; FSM-guided decoding guarantees *syntax*. Run both.
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
```python
|
| 155 |
+
from pydantic import BaseModel
|
| 156 |
+
from vllm.sampling_params import GuidedDecodingParams
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
class Invoice(BaseModel):
|
| 159 |
+
invoice_number: str
|
| 160 |
+
vendor_name: str
|
| 161 |
+
invoice_date: str
|
| 162 |
+
subtotal: float
|
| 163 |
+
tax: float
|
| 164 |
+
grand_total: float
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
sampling_params = SamplingParams(
|
| 167 |
+
temperature=0.0,
|
| 168 |
+
max_tokens=256,
|
| 169 |
+
guided_decoding=GuidedDecodingParams(json=Invoice.model_json_schema()),
|
| 170 |
+
)
|
| 171 |
+
```
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
---
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
## Evaluation
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
### Five-domain enterprise suite (in-domain, n = 5 documents)
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
| Domain | Document type | Base MiniCPM5-1B | **SchemaForge-1B** | F1 | Throughput |
|
| 180 |
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 181 |
+
| BMK-01 Finance | Tax invoices | 65.8 % | **100.0 %** | 1.000 | 61.91 tok/s |
|
| 182 |
+
| BMK-02 Supply chain | Bills of lading | 67.1 % | **100.0 %** | 1.000 | 62.40 tok/s |
|
| 183 |
+
| BMK-03 IT hardware | Procurement bills | 64.2 % | **100.0 %** | 1.000 | 61.80 tok/s |
|
| 184 |
+
| BMK-04 Biomedical | Lab requisitions | 66.5 % | **100.0 %** | 1.000 | 62.15 tok/s |
|
| 185 |
+
| BMK-05 Cloud ops | Billing records | 65.4 % | **100.0 %** | 1.000 | 62.05 tok/s |
|
| 186 |
+
|
| 187 |
+
### Model comparison
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
| Variant | Teacher | JSON error rate | F1 | Throughput | VRAM |
|
| 190 |
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 191 |
+
| Base MiniCPM5-1B | none | 34.2 % | 0.612 | 62.00 tok/s | β2.4 GB |
|
| 192 |
+
| **SchemaForge-1B** | `gemma-4-E4B-it` | **0.0 %** | **1.000** | **61.91 tok/s** | **β2.4 GB** |
|
| 193 |
+
| **SchemaForge-1B** | `gemma-4-31B` | **0.0 %** | **1.000** | 56.12 tok/s | **β2.4 GB** |
|
| 194 |
+
| Gemma-4-31B | reference | 0.0 % | 1.000 | 12.40 tok/s | β38.5 GB |
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
Teacher scale conferred **no measurable quality advantage** on this task β the 4B teacher is the cost-effective choice.
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
### Out-of-domain (`suneeldk/text-json`)
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
| Iteration | Prompt template | Validity | Throughput |
|
| 201 |
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 202 |
+
| iter1 | chat tokens (`<start_of_turn>`) | 0.0 % | 76.94 tok/s |
|
| 203 |
+
| **iter2 (this model)** | **canonical** | **70.0 %** | **76.27 tok/s** |
|
| 204 |
+
| iter3 | system persona header | 0.0 % | 74.12 tok/s |
|
| 205 |
+
| base | canonical | 34.2 % | 62.00 tok/s |
|
| 206 |
+
|
| 207 |
+
---
|
| 208 |
+
|
| 209 |
+
## Training Details
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
| | |
|
| 212 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 213 |
+
| Architecture | `LlamaForCausalLM` β 24 layers, hidden 1536, GQA 16/2 heads, vocab 130,560 |
|
| 214 |
+
| Parameters | 1,080,632,832 total (679,552,512 non-embedding) |
|
| 215 |
+
| Objective | $\mathcal{L}_{KD} = \alpha\mathcal{L}_{CE} + (1-\alpha)\tau^2\mathcal{L}_{KL}$ |
|
| 216 |
+
| $\alpha$ / $\tau$ | 0.5 / 2.0 |
|
| 217 |
+
| Vocabulary projection | 256,000 β 130,560 (shared-subspace truncation) |
|
| 218 |
+
| Optimizer | AdamW, lr 2e-5, cosine, warmup 0.05 |
|
| 219 |
+
| Epochs | 3 (early-stopped on val loss) |
|
| 220 |
+
| Runtime | bfloat16, single-GPU PyTorch, eager attention (no ZeRO-3 / FlashAttention-2) |
|
| 221 |
+
| Max sequence length | 2,048 |
|
| 222 |
+
| Hardware | 1 Γ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Edition (96 GB), Nebius AI Cloud |
|
| 223 |
+
| Software | Python 3.12 Β· PyTorch 2.5 Β· transformers 5.x |
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
Full methodology, mathematics, compatibility patches, and ablations: **[`SCHEMAFORGE_WHITEPAPER.md`](./SCHEMAFORGE_WHITEPAPER.md)**.
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
---
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 230 |
+
|
| 231 |
+
Please read these before deploying.
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
- **Evaluation scale is small.** The in-domain suite is **n = 5 documents** (one per domain). The 100 % validity / 1.000 F1 figures are exact-match results on a small curated set, not population estimates β the Wilson 95 % CI on 5/5 is **[56.6 %, 100.0 %]**.
|
| 234 |
+
- **Training scale is small.** This checkpoint was distilled on **n = 5 samples**. An SFT control ($\alpha = 1.0$, no teacher logits) was **not run**, so we cannot presently separate the contribution of knowledge distillation from that of prompt-format conditioning.
|
| 235 |
+
- **Single seed.** No variance estimates or error bars. Sub-2B models vary substantially run-to-run on small datasets.
|
| 236 |
+
- **Prompt-template brittleness.** The headline failure mode. Deviating from the canonical template drops accuracy to ~0, not to a degraded-but-usable level.
|
| 237 |
+
- **Out-of-domain ceiling β 70 %.** Roughly 30 % of unseen real-world documents produce unparseable output. Use constrained decoding in production.
|
| 238 |
+
- **Synthetic in-domain documents.** Clean ASCII, consistent labeling, no OCR noise, English-only. Real scanned documents will be harder.
|
| 239 |
+
- **Teacher outputs as targets.** Where the teacher was wrong, the student learned the error. No human-annotated gold standard exists for this checkpoint.
|
| 240 |
+
- **Not evaluated against alternatives.** No comparison to Qwen2.5-1.5B, Phi-3-mini, rule-based extractors, or commercial document-AI APIs.
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
+
**Intended use:** structured extraction from short English business documents, behind a schema-validation layer.
|
| 243 |
+
**Out of scope:** open-domain chat, reasoning, code, multilingual input, medical/legal decision-making, or any use where an unvalidated extraction reaches a system of record.
|
| 244 |
+
|
| 245 |
+
### Planned v2 run
|
| 246 |
+
|
| 247 |
+
This is a **v1 release**, and the accuracy numbers above should be read as provisional. A second training and evaluation campaign is planned to address the limitations listed here directly:
|
| 248 |
+
|
| 249 |
+
- **Real-world evaluation corpus** replacing the synthetic 5-document suite β $n \geq 500$ held-out documents per domain, including OCR-noisy scans, multi-column layouts, and non-English fields, with a **human-annotated gold subset** so accuracy is no longer measured against teacher output.
|
| 250 |
+
- **The SFT control** ($\alpha = 1.0$, no teacher logits) to determine whether the distillation objective contributes anything beyond prompt-format conditioning.
|
| 251 |
+
- **Competitive baselines** β Qwen2.5-1.5B, Phi-3-mini, prompt-engineered base MiniCPM5-1B with constrained decoding, and a rule-based extractor β under one unified harness.
|
| 252 |
+
- **Multi-seed runs** (β₯3) with reported variance and confidence intervals on every metric.
|
| 253 |
+
- **Expanded metrics** beyond validity/F1/throughput/VRAM: per-field accuracy, schema-conformance rate, hallucinated-key rate, time-to-first-token, p50/p95 latency under concurrency, and cost per thousand documents.
|
| 254 |
+
|
| 255 |
+
Results will be published as a v2 card revision with the v1 numbers retained for comparison rather than quietly replaced.
|
| 256 |
+
|
| 257 |
+
---
|
| 258 |
+
|
| 259 |
+
## Citation
|
| 260 |
+
|
| 261 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 262 |
+
@techreport{ty2026schemaforge,
|
| 263 |
+
title = {SchemaForge: Distilling Ultra-Large Foundation Models into Edge SLMs
|
| 264 |
+
for Real-Time Enterprise JSON Extraction --
|
| 265 |
+
A Comparative Study of Gemma-4 Teachers and MiniCPM5-1B},
|
| 266 |
+
author = {Ty, Arjhine A.},
|
| 267 |
+
year = {2026},
|
| 268 |
+
note = {Model: SchemaForge-1B (schemaforge-1b-iter2)},
|
| 269 |
+
url = {https://huggingface.co/arrochi112/SchemaForge-1B-JSON-Extractor}
|
| 270 |
+
}
|
| 271 |
+
```
|
| 272 |
+
|
| 273 |
+
## Acknowledgements
|
| 274 |
+
|
| 275 |
+
Teachers: `google/gemma-4-31B`, `google/gemma-4-E4B-it`. Student architecture: `openbmb/MiniCPM5-1B`. Compute: Nebius AI Cloud. Serving: vLLM. Constrained decoding: Outlines.
|
| 276 |
+
|
| 277 |
+
**License:** Apache 2.0 β subject to the upstream licenses of the base and teacher models.
|
SCHEMAFORGE_WHITEPAPER.md
ADDED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
SchemaForge_Whitepaper.pdf
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:4f4e2c4d4a82f0d9f0e06644cb570b80e17d1406eb2471a9288ed3326167a490
|
| 3 |
+
size 1017064
|
graphs/accuracy_across_iterations.png
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
graphs/loss_convergence.png
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
graphs/throughput_vs_vram.png
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|