--- license: mit base_model: meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct tags: - llama - lora - political-science - survey-replication - canadian-election-study - peft - unsloth datasets: - custom language: - en pipeline_tag: text-generation --- # CES Phase 3B LoRA: With Party Identification A LoRA adapter for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct that predicts political ideology using party identification in addition to leader ratings and policy positions. **For most use cases, prefer [Phase 3A](https://huggingface.co/baglecake/ces-phase3a-lora) instead** — this model exists to demonstrate that party ID is redundant. ## Model Description This model was trained on the Canadian Election Study (CES) 2021 to predict self-reported ideology (0-10 left-right scale) from: - **Demographics**: Age, gender, province, education, employment, religion, marital status, urban/rural, born in Canada - **Leader Thermometers**: Ratings (0-100) of Justin Trudeau, Erin O'Toole, and Jagmeet Singh - **Wedge Issues**: Positions on carbon tax, energy/pipelines, and medical assistance in dying (MAID) - **Government Satisfaction**: Overall satisfaction with federal government - **Party Identification**: "I usually think of myself as a Liberal/Conservative/NDP..." (ONLY IN THIS MODEL) ## Performance | Model | Inputs | Correlation (r) | |-------|--------|-----------------| | Phase 2 | Demographics + 3 psychographics | 0.428 | | Phase 3A | + Leader thermometers + wedge issues | 0.560 | | **Phase 3B (this model)** | **+ Party ID** | **0.574** | **Partisan Delta = 0.014** — Party ID adds only 1.4% improvement. ## Why Phase 3A is Preferred We trained this model (Phase 3B) specifically to test whether party identification adds predictive value beyond substantive attitudes. It doesn't. **The null result is the finding:** - Party identity is **redundant** — it's already encoded in how people feel about leaders and their policy positions - Canadian ideology is **substantive, not tribal** — people's "team" reflects their actual views - Adding party ID is "cheating" — you're just asking people their ideology with extra steps Phase 3B exists for reproducibility and to demonstrate this null result empirically. ## Usage ```python from peft import PeftModel from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( "meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct", load_in_4bit=True ) model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "baglecake/ces-phase3b-lora") tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct") # Example prompt (note: includes party ID) system = """You are a 45-year-old man from Ontario, Canada. You live in a suburb of a large city. Your highest level of education is a bachelor's degree. You are currently employed full-time. You are married. You have children. You are Catholic. You were born in Canada. Political Profile: Leader Ratings: Justin Trudeau: 25/100, Erin O'Toole: 70/100, Jagmeet Singh: 30/100. Views: Strongly disagrees that the federal government should continue the carbon tax; strongly agrees that the government should do more to help the energy sector/pipelines. Overall Satisfaction: Is not at all satisfied with the federal government. Party ID: Generally thinks of themselves as a Conservative. Answer survey questions as this person would, based on their background and detailed political profile.""" user = "On a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means left/liberal and 10 means right/conservative, where would you place yourself politically? Just give the number." ``` ## Training Details - **Base model**: meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (4-bit quantized via Unsloth) - **Training data**: 14,455 examples from CES 2021 - **LoRA rank**: 32 - **LoRA alpha**: 64 - **Target modules**: q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj - **Epochs**: 3 - **Hardware**: NVIDIA A100 40GB (Colab Pro) ## Limitations 1. **Narrow task**: Model only outputs ideology numbers (0-10). 2. **Canadian-specific**: Trained on CES 2021 under Trudeau government. 3. **Leader-specific**: Uses 2021 leader names. 4. **Redundant information**: Party ID doesn't add meaningful predictive value over Phase 3A. ## Citation ```bibtex @software{ces-phase3-lora, title = {CES Phase 3 LoRA: Leader Affect and Policy Prediction}, author = {Coburn, Del}, year = {2025}, url = {https://huggingface.co/baglecake/ces-phase3a-lora} } ``` ## Part of emile-GCE This model is part of the [emile-GCE](https://github.com/delcoburn/emile-gce) project for Generative Computational Ethnography.