skills/aceternity-ui/_scores.json

{
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "skillHash": "sha256:0ed66731099935ea565a5645a28cba02e07e7056e4bfed904b688762cfa4f1d8",
  "scoredAt": "2026-05-13T11:37:30.294Z",
  "backend": "ollama",
  "model": "gpt-oss:20b",
  "quality": {
    "score": 93,
    "dimensions": {
      "clarity": "PASS",
      "completeness": "WEAK",
      "conciseness": "PASS",
      "actionability": "PASS",
      "crossPlatform": "PASS",
      "examples": "PASS"
    },
    "issues": [
      {
        "severity": "MEDIUM",
        "category": "completeness",
        "detail": "The skill does not cover error scenarios or edge cases, focusing only on happy path usage."
      }
    ]
  },
  "security": {
    "verdict": "SAFE",
    "issues": []
  },
  "impact": {
    "multiplier": 5.58,
    "baselineAvg": 12,
    "treatmentAvg": 67,
    "scenarios": [
      {
        "name": "3d-card-tilt",
        "baseline": 0,
        "treatment": 100,
        "rationale": "Response A fully satisfies the rubric, while Response B omits all required components and logic."
      },
      {
        "name": "spotlight-follow-cursor",
        "baseline": 30,
        "treatment": 80,
        "rationale": "Response A covers most rubric items but omits the SpotlightCard example, while Response B lacks key hooks, motion, Tailwind, and the required example."
      },
      {
        "name": "wavy-animated-background",
        "baseline": 5,
        "treatment": 20,
        "rationale": "Response B includes some prop usage and hints at a component, while Response A only provides a CSS-based solution with no canvas or animation logic."
      }
    ]
  }
}