Buckets:
| { | |
| "schema_version": "shft_reasoning_frames_v1", | |
| "equity": { | |
| "researcher": { | |
| "scenario": "equity research memo review", | |
| "decision": "reject the thesis", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "valuation, moat, ROIC, earnings quality, base rates, accounting quality, and financial statement analysis", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "equity research valuation moat ROIC earnings quality case study", | |
| "accounting quality cash flow red flags reject approve because", | |
| "financial statement analysis base rate investment thesis checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "portfolio_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "portfolio construction and position-sizing review", | |
| "decision": "reject the position increase", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "portfolio construction, position sizing, rebalancing, tradeoff, and risk budget", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "portfolio construction position sizing risk budget case study", | |
| "equity portfolio rebalancing tradeoff red flags checklist", | |
| "position increase reject approve because concentration risk" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "risk_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "risk control and red-flag review", | |
| "decision": "reject the exposure", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "red flag, risk control, stress test, liquidity risk, internal control, and drawdown", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "risk manager stress test liquidity risk red flags case study", | |
| "internal control drawdown risk control reject approve because", | |
| "equity risk factors warning signs checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "performance_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "performance attribution review", | |
| "decision": "reject the performance explanation", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "attribution, benchmark, tracking error, information ratio, and risk adjusted evidence", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "performance attribution benchmark tracking error case study", | |
| "information ratio risk adjusted return reject approve because", | |
| "portfolio performance explanation red flags checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "client_portfolio_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "client suitability and explanation review", | |
| "decision": "reject the recommendation", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "client explanation, suitability, risk tolerance, and client scenario", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "client suitability risk tolerance portfolio recommendation case study", | |
| "client portfolio explanation reject approve because", | |
| "investor communication red flags checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "chief_investment_officer": { | |
| "scenario": "investment committee governance review", | |
| "decision": "reject the policy change", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "investment policy, capital market assumption, committee, and governance", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "investment committee governance capital market assumptions case study", | |
| "investment policy asset allocation reject approve because", | |
| "CIO governance red flags checklist" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "fixed_income": { | |
| "researcher": { | |
| "scenario": "fixed-income research memo review", | |
| "decision": "reject the credit or rates thesis", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "term structure, yield curve, duration, convexity, OAS, credit spread, default, recovery, covenants, cash-flow coverage, and relative value", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "fixed income research term structure credit spread default recovery case study", | |
| "bond valuation duration convexity OAS reject approve because", | |
| "issuer cash flow coverage covenant credit analysis pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "portfolio_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "fixed-income portfolio construction and risk-budget review", | |
| "decision": "reject the portfolio trade", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "curve positioning, carry, roll-down, sector allocation, spread beta, liquidity, credit quality, position sizing, and risk budget", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "fixed income portfolio construction curve positioning carry roll-down case study", | |
| "bond portfolio sector allocation spread beta liquidity risk budget reject approve because", | |
| "fixed income active management position sizing tradeoff checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "risk_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "fixed-income risk control and stress review", | |
| "decision": "reject the exposure", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "DV01, CS01, convexity, duration, credit migration, default stress, liquidity stress, market risk, capital requirement, and limit controls", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "fixed income risk DV01 CS01 stress test credit migration case study", | |
| "bond portfolio liquidity stress convexity duration red flags reject approve because", | |
| "FRTB IRRBB Basel credit risk pass fail checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "performance_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "fixed-income performance attribution review", | |
| "decision": "reject the attribution explanation", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "duration attribution, curve attribution, carry, roll-down, spread tightening or widening, sector selection, benchmark, tracking error, and risk-adjusted performance", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "fixed income performance attribution duration curve spread carry case study", | |
| "bond attribution benchmark tracking error reject approve because", | |
| "portfolio performance attribution roll-down spread selection red flags" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "client_portfolio_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "fixed-income client suitability and explanation review", | |
| "decision": "reject the client recommendation", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "income objective, duration risk, interest-rate sensitivity, credit quality, liquidity needs, tax constraints, suitability, and client communication", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "fixed income client suitability income objective duration risk case study", | |
| "bond recommendation client liquidity credit quality reject approve because", | |
| "client portfolio manager fixed income risk tolerance pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "chief_investment_officer": { | |
| "scenario": "fixed-income investment committee governance review", | |
| "decision": "reject the policy allocation change", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "policy duration, ALM, liability sensitivity, liquidity sleeve, capital preservation, monetary policy regime, credit cycle, capital market assumptions, and governance", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "fixed income CIO investment policy duration ALM monetary policy case study", | |
| "bond allocation governance liquidity sleeve reject approve because", | |
| "investment committee fixed income capital market assumptions pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "multi_asset": { | |
| "researcher": { | |
| "scenario": "multi-asset research memo review", | |
| "decision": "reject the cross-asset thesis", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "cross-asset macro, equity-bond correlation, inflation regime, real rates, factor exposures, alternatives, currency, and scenario analysis", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "multi asset research cross asset macro regime correlation case study", | |
| "asset allocation inflation real rates factor exposure reject approve because", | |
| "cross asset thesis scenario analysis pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "portfolio_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "multi-asset allocation and rebalancing review", | |
| "decision": "reject the allocation change", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "strategic allocation, tactical allocation, rebalancing, risk parity, drawdown budget, liquidity, alternatives, factor risk, and implementation tradeoffs", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "multi asset portfolio allocation rebalancing risk parity case study", | |
| "tactical asset allocation drawdown budget alternatives reject approve because", | |
| "cross asset portfolio construction tradeoff checklist" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "risk_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "multi-asset risk control and regime-stress review", | |
| "decision": "reject the risk posture", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "correlation breakdown, cross-asset stress, liquidity, leverage, concentration, currency, drawdown, regime shift, and risk controls", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "multi asset risk correlation breakdown stress test case study", | |
| "cross asset liquidity leverage concentration red flags reject approve because", | |
| "portfolio regime shift drawdown risk controls pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "performance_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "multi-asset performance attribution review", | |
| "decision": "reject the performance explanation", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "allocation effect, selection effect, interaction effect, factor attribution, currency attribution, benchmark drift, tracking error, and risk-adjusted return", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "multi asset performance attribution allocation selection interaction case study", | |
| "asset allocation attribution factor currency benchmark reject approve because", | |
| "portfolio performance explanation tracking error pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "client_portfolio_manager": { | |
| "scenario": "multi-asset client portfolio suitability review", | |
| "decision": "reject the client portfolio recommendation", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "IPS, goals, time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, diversification, rebalancing, suitability, and client communication", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "multi asset client suitability IPS goals time horizon case study", | |
| "asset allocation client portfolio diversification reject approve because", | |
| "client communication rebalancing risk tolerance pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| }, | |
| "chief_investment_officer": { | |
| "scenario": "multi-asset investment committee governance review", | |
| "decision": "reject the policy portfolio change", | |
| "pass_label": "fail", | |
| "focus": "capital market assumptions, policy portfolio, governance, strategic allocation, tactical ranges, macro regime, liquidity, scenario planning, and drawdown controls", | |
| "discovery_terms": [ | |
| "multi asset CIO capital market assumptions policy portfolio case study", | |
| "investment committee asset allocation governance reject approve because", | |
| "strategic allocation macro regime scenario planning pass fail reasoning" | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
Xet Storage Details
- Size:
- 10.7 kB
- Xet hash:
- 9dd44f9ff622f058630edcbe367ec3a8dcb7330fff4e1da598786126084b1985
·
Xet efficiently stores files, intelligently splitting them into unique chunks and accelerating uploads and downloads. More info.