Buckets:
tostido/Butterfly-Field-Station-storage / work /Convergence_Engine /kernel /trait_registration_system.py
| # Trait Registration System | |
| # Version 1.0 - Formal pathway for trait ontology evolution | |
| """ | |
| Trait registration system implementing the Codex Amendment process for trait ontology evolution. | |
| Enables lawful expansion of trait vocabulary while maintaining mathematical consistency. | |
| """ | |
| from dataclasses import dataclass, field | |
| from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Callable | |
| from enum import Enum | |
| import uuid | |
| import json | |
| import hashlib | |
| from datetime import datetime, timedelta | |
| from core_trait_framework import TraitDefinition, TraitCategory, StabilityEnvelope, CoreTraitFramework | |
| class AmendmentStatus(Enum): | |
| """Status of trait amendment proposals""" | |
| PROPOSED = "proposed" | |
| UNDER_REVIEW = "under_review" | |
| COMPATIBILITY_ANALYSIS = "compatibility_analysis" | |
| ARBITRATION_REVIEW = "arbitration_review" | |
| APPROVED = "approved" | |
| REJECTED = "rejected" | |
| INTEGRATED = "integrated" | |
| class TraitAmendmentProposal: | |
| """ | |
| Formal proposal for adding new trait to the ontology. | |
| Must pass through complete Codex Amendment process. | |
| """ | |
| proposal_id: str # UUID for proposal tracking | |
| proposed_trait: TraitDefinition # Trait definition for integration | |
| proposer_agent_id: str # Agent submitting proposal | |
| justification: str # Rationale for trait addition | |
| compatibility_analysis: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None # Analysis results | |
| arbitration_notes: List[str] = field(default_factory=list) # Review comments | |
| status: AmendmentStatus = AmendmentStatus.PROPOSED | |
| created_timestamp: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow) | |
| status_history: List[Dict[str, Any]] = field(default_factory=list) | |
| def __post_init__(self): | |
| # Initialize status history | |
| if not self.status_history: | |
| self.status_history.append({ | |
| "status": self.status.value, | |
| "timestamp": self.created_timestamp.isoformat(), | |
| "agent": self.proposer_agent_id, | |
| "notes": "Initial proposal submission" | |
| }) | |
| class CompatibilityAnalysisResult: | |
| """Results of mathematical compatibility analysis""" | |
| is_compatible: bool | |
| mathematical_consistency: bool | |
| naming_conflicts: List[str] | |
| dependency_issues: List[str] | |
| stability_envelope_analysis: Dict[str, Any] | |
| interaction_impact_assessment: Dict[str, float] | |
| recommendation: str | |
| detailed_analysis: Dict[str, Any] | |
| class TraitRegistrationSystem: | |
| """ | |
| Formal system for trait ontology evolution through Codex Amendment process. | |
| Maintains mathematical sovereignty while enabling lawful expansion. | |
| """ | |
| def __init__(self, core_framework: CoreTraitFramework): | |
| self.core_framework = core_framework | |
| self.active_proposals: Dict[str, TraitAmendmentProposal] = {} | |
| self.proposal_history: List[TraitAmendmentProposal] = [] | |
| self.amendment_ledger: List[Dict[str, Any]] = [] | |
| # Analysis functions for compatibility checking | |
| self.compatibility_analyzers: List[Callable] = [ | |
| self._analyze_mathematical_consistency, | |
| self._analyze_naming_compatibility, | |
| self._analyze_dependency_validity, | |
| self._analyze_stability_envelope_impact, | |
| self._analyze_interaction_matrix_impact | |
| ] | |
| # Arbitration council for governance decisions | |
| self.arbitration_council: List[str] = [ | |
| "djinn_meta_auditor", | |
| "djinn_kernel_engineer", | |
| "djinn_stability_monitor", | |
| "djinn_trait_specialist" | |
| ] | |
| def submit_trait_proposal(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition, | |
| proposer_agent_id: str, | |
| justification: str) -> str: | |
| """ | |
| Submit new trait proposal for amendment process. | |
| Returns proposal ID for tracking. | |
| """ | |
| # Generate proposal UUID | |
| proposal_data = { | |
| "trait_name": trait_def.name, | |
| "proposer": proposer_agent_id, | |
| "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(), | |
| "justification_hash": hashlib.sha256(justification.encode()).hexdigest() | |
| } | |
| proposal_id = str(uuid.uuid5( | |
| uuid.UUID('6ba7b810-9dad-11d1-80b4-00c04fd430c8'), | |
| json.dumps(proposal_data, sort_keys=True) | |
| )) | |
| # Create proposal | |
| proposal = TraitAmendmentProposal( | |
| proposal_id=proposal_id, | |
| proposed_trait=trait_def, | |
| proposer_agent_id=proposer_agent_id, | |
| justification=justification | |
| ) | |
| # Register proposal | |
| self.active_proposals[proposal_id] = proposal | |
| # Initiate review process | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.UNDER_REVIEW, | |
| "djinn_amendment_system", | |
| "Proposal submitted for review") | |
| return proposal_id | |
| def execute_compatibility_analysis(self, proposal_id: str) -> CompatibilityAnalysisResult: | |
| """ | |
| Execute comprehensive compatibility analysis for trait proposal. | |
| Core component of amendment process. | |
| """ | |
| proposal = self.active_proposals.get(proposal_id) | |
| if not proposal: | |
| raise ValueError(f"Unknown proposal: {proposal_id}") | |
| # Update status | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.COMPATIBILITY_ANALYSIS, | |
| "djinn_compatibility_analyzer", | |
| "Beginning compatibility analysis") | |
| # Run all compatibility analyzers | |
| analysis_results = {} | |
| for analyzer in self.compatibility_analyzers: | |
| analyzer_name = analyzer.__name__ | |
| try: | |
| result = analyzer(proposal.proposed_trait) | |
| analysis_results[analyzer_name] = result | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| analysis_results[analyzer_name] = {"error": str(e), "passed": False} | |
| # Synthesize overall compatibility assessment | |
| compatibility_result = self._synthesize_compatibility_analysis(analysis_results) | |
| # Update proposal with analysis | |
| proposal.compatibility_analysis = { | |
| "result": compatibility_result, | |
| "detailed_analysis": analysis_results, | |
| "analysis_timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(), | |
| "analyzer_version": "1.0" | |
| } | |
| # Advance to arbitration if compatible | |
| if compatibility_result.is_compatible: | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.ARBITRATION_REVIEW, | |
| "djinn_compatibility_analyzer", | |
| "Analysis passed - forwarding to arbitration") | |
| else: | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.REJECTED, | |
| "djinn_compatibility_analyzer", | |
| f"Analysis failed: {compatibility_result.recommendation}") | |
| return compatibility_result | |
| def _analyze_mathematical_consistency(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition) -> Dict[str, Any]: | |
| """Analyze mathematical consistency of proposed trait""" | |
| consistency_checks = { | |
| "stability_envelope_valid": True, | |
| "normalization_valid": True, | |
| "serialization_valid": True, | |
| "uuid_anchorable": True | |
| } | |
| try: | |
| # Check stability envelope mathematics | |
| envelope = trait_def.stability_envelope | |
| if not (0.0 <= envelope.center <= 1.0): | |
| consistency_checks["stability_envelope_valid"] = False | |
| if not (0.0 < envelope.radius <= 0.5): | |
| consistency_checks["stability_envelope_valid"] = False | |
| if envelope.compression_factor <= 0.0: | |
| consistency_checks["stability_envelope_valid"] = False | |
| # Test UUID anchoring compatibility | |
| test_payload = self.core_framework.create_trait_payload({trait_def.name: 0.5}) | |
| consistency_checks["uuid_anchorable"] = True | |
| # Test violation pressure calculation | |
| vp = self.core_framework.calculate_trait_violation_pressure(trait_def.name, 0.7) | |
| consistency_checks["vp_calculable"] = True | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| consistency_checks["error"] = str(e) | |
| consistency_checks["uuid_anchorable"] = False | |
| return { | |
| "passed": all(v for k, v in consistency_checks.items() if k != "error"), | |
| "checks": consistency_checks | |
| } | |
| def _analyze_naming_compatibility(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition) -> Dict[str, Any]: | |
| """Analyze naming compatibility with existing traits""" | |
| conflicts = [] | |
| recommendations = [] | |
| # Check for exact name conflicts | |
| if trait_def.name in self.core_framework.trait_registry: | |
| conflicts.append(f"Exact name conflict: {trait_def.name}") | |
| # Check for similar names that could cause confusion | |
| existing_names = set(self.core_framework.trait_registry.keys()) | |
| for existing_name in existing_names: | |
| # Check for substring conflicts | |
| if trait_def.name in existing_name or existing_name in trait_def.name: | |
| conflicts.append(f"Substring conflict with: {existing_name}") | |
| # Check for similar spelling (simple Levenshtein-like check) | |
| if self._names_too_similar(trait_def.name, existing_name): | |
| recommendations.append(f"Very similar to existing: {existing_name}") | |
| return { | |
| "passed": len(conflicts) == 0, | |
| "conflicts": conflicts, | |
| "recommendations": recommendations | |
| } | |
| def _analyze_dependency_validity(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition) -> Dict[str, Any]: | |
| """Analyze dependency chain validity""" | |
| dependency_issues = [] | |
| circular_dependencies = [] | |
| # Check all dependencies exist | |
| for dep_name in trait_def.dependencies: | |
| if dep_name not in self.core_framework.trait_registry: | |
| dependency_issues.append(f"Unknown dependency: {dep_name}") | |
| # Check for potential circular dependencies | |
| if self._would_create_circular_dependency(trait_def): | |
| circular_dependencies.append(f"Would create circular dependency chain") | |
| return { | |
| "passed": len(dependency_issues) == 0 and len(circular_dependencies) == 0, | |
| "dependency_issues": dependency_issues, | |
| "circular_dependencies": circular_dependencies | |
| } | |
| def _analyze_stability_envelope_impact(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition) -> Dict[str, Any]: | |
| """Analyze impact of stability envelope on system dynamics""" | |
| envelope = trait_def.stability_envelope | |
| # Analyze envelope parameters relative to existing traits | |
| existing_envelopes = [t.stability_envelope for t in self.core_framework.trait_registry.values()] | |
| center_analysis = { | |
| "center": envelope.center, | |
| "existing_centers": [e.center for e in existing_envelopes], | |
| "center_conflict_risk": self._assess_center_conflicts(envelope, existing_envelopes) | |
| } | |
| radius_analysis = { | |
| "radius": envelope.radius, | |
| "existing_radii": [e.radius for e in existing_envelopes], | |
| "radius_harmony": self._assess_radius_harmony(envelope, existing_envelopes) | |
| } | |
| compression_analysis = { | |
| "compression_factor": envelope.compression_factor, | |
| "stability_impact": self._assess_stability_impact(envelope) | |
| } | |
| return { | |
| "passed": True, # Stability analysis is advisory, not blocking | |
| "center_analysis": center_analysis, | |
| "radius_analysis": radius_analysis, | |
| "compression_analysis": compression_analysis | |
| } | |
| def _analyze_interaction_matrix_impact(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition) -> Dict[str, Any]: | |
| """Analyze impact on trait interaction matrix""" | |
| # Calculate potential interaction strengths with existing traits | |
| potential_interactions = {} | |
| for existing_trait_name in self.core_framework.trait_registry.keys(): | |
| # Simple heuristic based on category and dependencies | |
| if trait_def.category == self.core_framework.trait_registry[existing_trait_name].category: | |
| potential_interactions[existing_trait_name] = 0.3 # Same category = moderate interaction | |
| if existing_trait_name in trait_def.dependencies: | |
| potential_interactions[existing_trait_name] = 0.6 # Dependency = strong interaction | |
| if trait_def.name in self.core_framework.trait_registry[existing_trait_name].dependencies: | |
| potential_interactions[existing_trait_name] = -0.4 # Reverse dependency | |
| return { | |
| "passed": True, # Interaction analysis is informational | |
| "potential_interactions": potential_interactions, | |
| "matrix_expansion_required": len(potential_interactions) > 0 | |
| } | |
| def _synthesize_compatibility_analysis(self, analysis_results: Dict[str, Any]) -> CompatibilityAnalysisResult: | |
| """Synthesize individual analysis results into overall compatibility assessment""" | |
| # Check if all critical analyses passed | |
| critical_analyses = ["_analyze_mathematical_consistency", "_analyze_naming_compatibility", "_analyze_dependency_validity"] | |
| all_critical_passed = all( | |
| analysis_results.get(analyzer, {}).get("passed", False) | |
| for analyzer in critical_analyses | |
| ) | |
| # Collect issues | |
| naming_conflicts = analysis_results.get("_analyze_naming_compatibility", {}).get("conflicts", []) | |
| dependency_issues = analysis_results.get("_analyze_dependency_validity", {}).get("dependency_issues", []) | |
| # Calculate mathematical consistency | |
| math_result = analysis_results.get("_analyze_mathematical_consistency", {}) | |
| mathematical_consistency = math_result.get("passed", False) | |
| # Extract stability and interaction analysis | |
| stability_analysis = analysis_results.get("_analyze_stability_envelope_impact", {}) | |
| interaction_analysis = analysis_results.get("_analyze_interaction_matrix_impact", {}) | |
| # Generate recommendation | |
| if all_critical_passed: | |
| recommendation = "APPROVE: Trait meets all compatibility requirements" | |
| elif not mathematical_consistency: | |
| recommendation = "REJECT: Mathematical consistency violations detected" | |
| elif naming_conflicts: | |
| recommendation = "REJECT: Naming conflicts require resolution" | |
| elif dependency_issues: | |
| recommendation = "REJECT: Dependency issues require resolution" | |
| else: | |
| recommendation = "REVIEW: Manual review required for edge cases" | |
| return CompatibilityAnalysisResult( | |
| is_compatible=all_critical_passed, | |
| mathematical_consistency=mathematical_consistency, | |
| naming_conflicts=naming_conflicts, | |
| dependency_issues=dependency_issues, | |
| stability_envelope_analysis=stability_analysis, | |
| interaction_impact_assessment=interaction_analysis.get("potential_interactions", {}), | |
| recommendation=recommendation, | |
| detailed_analysis=analysis_results | |
| ) | |
| def execute_arbitration_review(self, proposal_id: str, | |
| reviewing_agent: str, | |
| decision: str, | |
| notes: str) -> bool: | |
| """Execute arbitration council review of trait proposal""" | |
| proposal = self.active_proposals.get(proposal_id) | |
| if not proposal or proposal.status != AmendmentStatus.ARBITRATION_REVIEW: | |
| return False | |
| # Add arbitration notes | |
| proposal.arbitration_notes.append(f"{reviewing_agent}: {decision} - {notes}") | |
| # For this implementation, single arbitrator can approve/reject | |
| # In full system, would require council consensus | |
| if decision.lower() == "approve": | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.APPROVED, | |
| reviewing_agent, f"Arbitration approved: {notes}") | |
| return True | |
| elif decision.lower() == "reject": | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.REJECTED, | |
| reviewing_agent, f"Arbitration rejected: {notes}") | |
| return False | |
| return False | |
| def integrate_approved_trait(self, proposal_id: str, integrating_agent: str) -> bool: | |
| """Integrate approved trait into core framework""" | |
| proposal = self.active_proposals.get(proposal_id) | |
| if not proposal or proposal.status != AmendmentStatus.APPROVED: | |
| return False | |
| # Register trait in core framework | |
| success = self.core_framework.register_trait(proposal.proposed_trait) | |
| if success: | |
| # Update proposal status | |
| self._advance_proposal_status(proposal_id, AmendmentStatus.INTEGRATED, | |
| integrating_agent, "Trait successfully integrated") | |
| # Record in amendment ledger | |
| self.amendment_ledger.append({ | |
| "proposal_id": proposal_id, | |
| "trait_name": proposal.proposed_trait.name, | |
| "integration_timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(), | |
| "integrating_agent": integrating_agent, | |
| "amendment_type": "trait_addition" | |
| }) | |
| # Move to history | |
| self.proposal_history.append(proposal) | |
| del self.active_proposals[proposal_id] | |
| return success | |
| def _advance_proposal_status(self, proposal_id: str, new_status: AmendmentStatus, | |
| agent_id: str, notes: str): | |
| """Advance proposal to new status with audit trail""" | |
| proposal = self.active_proposals.get(proposal_id) | |
| if not proposal: | |
| return | |
| # Update status | |
| proposal.status = new_status | |
| # Add to status history | |
| proposal.status_history.append({ | |
| "status": new_status.value, | |
| "timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(), | |
| "agent": agent_id, | |
| "notes": notes | |
| }) | |
| def _names_too_similar(self, name1: str, name2: str, threshold: int = 2) -> bool: | |
| """Simple string similarity check""" | |
| if abs(len(name1) - len(name2)) > threshold: | |
| return False | |
| differences = sum(c1 != c2 for c1, c2 in zip(name1, name2)) | |
| return differences <= threshold | |
| def _would_create_circular_dependency(self, trait_def: TraitDefinition) -> bool: | |
| """Check if trait would create circular dependency""" | |
| # Simple check - in full implementation would do graph analysis | |
| return trait_def.name in trait_def.dependencies | |
| def _assess_center_conflicts(self, envelope: StabilityEnvelope, existing: List[StabilityEnvelope]) -> float: | |
| """Assess potential conflicts with existing stability centers""" | |
| if not existing: | |
| return 0.0 | |
| min_distance = min(abs(envelope.center - e.center) for e in existing) | |
| return max(0.0, 1.0 - (min_distance / 0.5)) # Conflict risk increases as centers get closer | |
| def _assess_radius_harmony(self, envelope: StabilityEnvelope, existing: List[StabilityEnvelope]) -> float: | |
| """Assess harmony with existing radius values""" | |
| if not existing: | |
| return 1.0 | |
| avg_radius = sum(e.radius for e in existing) / len(existing) | |
| radius_difference = abs(envelope.radius - avg_radius) | |
| return max(0.0, 1.0 - (radius_difference / 0.5)) # Harmony decreases with difference | |
| def _assess_stability_impact(self, envelope: StabilityEnvelope) -> str: | |
| """Assess stability impact of envelope parameters""" | |
| if envelope.compression_factor > 2.0: | |
| return "HIGH_STABILITY: Strong compression may resist necessary evolution" | |
| elif envelope.compression_factor < 0.5: | |
| return "LOW_STABILITY: Weak compression may allow excessive drift" | |
| else: | |
| return "BALANCED: Compression factor within normal range" | |
| def get_proposal_status(self, proposal_id: str) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]: | |
| """Get current status of trait proposal""" | |
| proposal = self.active_proposals.get(proposal_id) | |
| if not proposal: | |
| # Check history | |
| for historical_proposal in self.proposal_history: | |
| if historical_proposal.proposal_id == proposal_id: | |
| proposal = historical_proposal | |
| break | |
| if not proposal: | |
| return None | |
| return { | |
| "proposal_id": proposal.proposal_id, | |
| "trait_name": proposal.proposed_trait.name, | |
| "current_status": proposal.status.value, | |
| "proposer": proposal.proposer_agent_id, | |
| "created": proposal.created_timestamp.isoformat(), | |
| "status_history": proposal.status_history, | |
| "compatibility_analysis": proposal.compatibility_analysis, | |
| "arbitration_notes": proposal.arbitration_notes | |
| } | |
| def list_active_proposals(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]: | |
| """List all active proposals""" | |
| return [ | |
| { | |
| "proposal_id": proposal.proposal_id, | |
| "trait_name": proposal.proposed_trait.name, | |
| "status": proposal.status.value, | |
| "proposer": proposal.proposer_agent_id, | |
| "created": proposal.created_timestamp.isoformat() | |
| } | |
| for proposal in self.active_proposals.values() | |
| ] | |
| def export_amendment_ledger(self) -> Dict[str, Any]: | |
| """Export complete amendment ledger for audit""" | |
| return { | |
| "ledger_version": "1.0", | |
| "total_amendments": len(self.amendment_ledger), | |
| "active_proposals": len(self.active_proposals), | |
| "completed_proposals": len(self.proposal_history), | |
| "amendments": self.amendment_ledger, | |
| "export_timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() | |
| } | |
| # Example usage | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| # Initialize systems | |
| core_framework = CoreTraitFramework() | |
| registration_system = TraitRegistrationSystem(core_framework) | |
| # Example: Propose new cognitive trait | |
| cognitive_trait = TraitDefinition( | |
| name="pattern_recognition", | |
| category=TraitCategory.COGNITIVE, | |
| stability_envelope=StabilityEnvelope(center=0.6, radius=0.2, compression_factor=1.1), | |
| description="Ability to recognize and utilize patterns in information", | |
| dependencies=["convergencestability"] | |
| ) | |
| # Submit proposal | |
| proposal_id = registration_system.submit_trait_proposal( | |
| cognitive_trait, | |
| "djinn_cognitive_specialist", | |
| "Pattern recognition is fundamental for intelligent system adaptation" | |
| ) | |
| print(f"Submitted proposal: {proposal_id}") | |
| # Execute compatibility analysis | |
| analysis_result = registration_system.execute_compatibility_analysis(proposal_id) | |
| print(f"Compatibility analysis: {analysis_result.recommendation}") | |
| # Execute arbitration (if passed analysis) | |
| if analysis_result.is_compatible: | |
| arbitration_success = registration_system.execute_arbitration_review( | |
| proposal_id, | |
| "djinn_meta_auditor", | |
| "approve", | |
| "Cognitive traits enhance system intelligence capabilities" | |
| ) | |
| if arbitration_success: | |
| # Integrate trait | |
| integration_success = registration_system.integrate_approved_trait( | |
| proposal_id, | |
| "djinn_integration_agent" | |
| ) | |
| print(f"Integration successful: {integration_success}") | |
| # Show final status | |
| final_status = registration_system.get_proposal_status(proposal_id) | |
| print(f"Final status: {final_status['current_status']}") | |
| # Show updated framework | |
| print(f"Framework now has {len(core_framework.trait_registry)} traits") |
Xet Storage Details
- Size:
- 25.5 kB
- Xet hash:
- 9658b1b2a19f7fffbb9402bf3cf31135d8bcaff837f180dcc422dd2897cc6b28
·
Xet efficiently stores files, intelligently splitting them into unique chunks and accelerating uploads and downloads. More info.