Add SHAP + LIME explainability analysis
Browse files- explainability/shap_analysis.py +243 -0
explainability/shap_analysis.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
"""
|
| 2 |
+
SHAP and LIME explainability analysis for trained IDS models.
|
| 3 |
+
"""
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
import os
|
| 6 |
+
import sys
|
| 7 |
+
import json
|
| 8 |
+
import numpy as np
|
| 9 |
+
import torch
|
| 10 |
+
import shap
|
| 11 |
+
from lime import lime_tabular
|
| 12 |
+
import matplotlib
|
| 13 |
+
matplotlib.use('Agg')
|
| 14 |
+
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
sys.path.insert(0, os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))))
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
from models.mlp_baseline import MLP_IDS
|
| 19 |
+
from models.lstm_model import LSTM_IDS
|
| 20 |
+
from models.cnn1d_model import CNN1D_IDS
|
| 21 |
+
from data.preprocess import load_preprocessed, FEATURE_NAMES
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
SEED = 42
|
| 24 |
+
np.random.seed(SEED)
|
| 25 |
+
torch.manual_seed(SEED)
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
DEVICE = torch.device('cpu') # SHAP works best on CPU for these models
|
| 28 |
+
RESULTS_DIR = 'results'
|
| 29 |
+
MODELS_DIR = 'saved_models'
|
| 30 |
+
N_BACKGROUND = 100 # Background samples for SHAP
|
| 31 |
+
N_EXPLAIN = 200 # Samples to explain
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
def load_model(model_class, model_name, num_classes=2):
|
| 35 |
+
"""Load trained model."""
|
| 36 |
+
model = model_class(in_dim=41, num_classes=num_classes)
|
| 37 |
+
model.load_state_dict(torch.load(
|
| 38 |
+
os.path.join(MODELS_DIR, f'{model_name}_best.pt'),
|
| 39 |
+
weights_only=True, map_location='cpu'
|
| 40 |
+
))
|
| 41 |
+
model.eval()
|
| 42 |
+
return model
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
def model_predict_fn(model, X):
|
| 46 |
+
"""Wrapper for LIME compatibility — returns probabilities."""
|
| 47 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 48 |
+
tensor = torch.FloatTensor(X).to(DEVICE)
|
| 49 |
+
logits = model(tensor)
|
| 50 |
+
probs = torch.softmax(logits, dim=1).numpy()
|
| 51 |
+
return probs
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
def run_shap_analysis(model, model_name, X_train, X_test, class_names):
|
| 55 |
+
"""Compute SHAP values using KernelExplainer (model-agnostic)."""
|
| 56 |
+
print(f"\n--- SHAP Analysis: {model_name} ---")
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
# Background data
|
| 59 |
+
bg_idx = np.random.choice(len(X_train), N_BACKGROUND, replace=False)
|
| 60 |
+
background = X_train[bg_idx]
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
# Samples to explain
|
| 63 |
+
exp_idx = np.random.choice(len(X_test), N_EXPLAIN, replace=False)
|
| 64 |
+
X_explain = X_test[exp_idx]
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
# Create predict function
|
| 67 |
+
def predict_fn(X):
|
| 68 |
+
return model_predict_fn(model, X)
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
# KernelExplainer (model-agnostic, works for all architectures)
|
| 71 |
+
explainer = shap.KernelExplainer(predict_fn, background)
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
print(f" Computing SHAP values for {N_EXPLAIN} samples...")
|
| 74 |
+
shap_values = explainer.shap_values(X_explain, nsamples=200, silent=True)
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
# --- Global Feature Importance ---
|
| 77 |
+
mean_abs_shap = np.abs(shap_values[0]).mean(axis=0)
|
| 78 |
+
feature_importance = list(zip(FEATURE_NAMES, mean_abs_shap))
|
| 79 |
+
feature_importance.sort(key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
print(f"\n Top 10 features (by mean |SHAP| for {class_names[0]}):")
|
| 82 |
+
for fname, imp in feature_importance[:10]:
|
| 83 |
+
print(f" {fname:35s}: {imp:.4f}")
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
# --- Save SHAP summary plot ---
|
| 86 |
+
os.makedirs(RESULTS_DIR, exist_ok=True)
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 8))
|
| 89 |
+
shap.summary_plot(shap_values[0], X_explain, feature_names=FEATURE_NAMES,
|
| 90 |
+
show=False, max_display=15)
|
| 91 |
+
plt.title(f'SHAP Feature Importance - {model_name.upper()} ({class_names[0]})')
|
| 92 |
+
plt.tight_layout()
|
| 93 |
+
plt.savefig(os.path.join(RESULTS_DIR, f'shap_summary_{model_name}.png'), dpi=150)
|
| 94 |
+
plt.close()
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
# --- Save bar plot ---
|
| 97 |
+
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
|
| 98 |
+
top_features = feature_importance[:15]
|
| 99 |
+
names = [f[0] for f in top_features]
|
| 100 |
+
values = [f[1] for f in top_features]
|
| 101 |
+
plt.barh(range(len(names)), values[::-1], color='steelblue')
|
| 102 |
+
plt.yticks(range(len(names)), names[::-1])
|
| 103 |
+
plt.xlabel('Mean |SHAP value|')
|
| 104 |
+
plt.title(f'Top 15 Features - {model_name.upper()}')
|
| 105 |
+
plt.tight_layout()
|
| 106 |
+
plt.savefig(os.path.join(RESULTS_DIR, f'shap_bar_{model_name}.png'), dpi=150)
|
| 107 |
+
plt.close()
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
return shap_values, feature_importance, exp_idx
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
def run_lime_analysis(model, model_name, X_train, X_test, class_names, n_instances=20):
|
| 113 |
+
"""Run LIME on a subset of test samples."""
|
| 114 |
+
print(f"\n--- LIME Analysis: {model_name} ---")
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
def predict_fn(X):
|
| 117 |
+
return model_predict_fn(model, X)
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
explainer = lime_tabular.LimeTabularExplainer(
|
| 120 |
+
X_train,
|
| 121 |
+
feature_names=FEATURE_NAMES,
|
| 122 |
+
class_names=class_names,
|
| 123 |
+
discretize_continuous=True,
|
| 124 |
+
random_state=SEED
|
| 125 |
+
)
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
lime_results = []
|
| 128 |
+
all_top_features = {}
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
idx_to_explain = np.random.choice(len(X_test), n_instances, replace=False)
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
for i, idx in enumerate(idx_to_explain):
|
| 133 |
+
sample = X_test[idx]
|
| 134 |
+
exp = explainer.explain_instance(sample, predict_fn, num_features=10, top_labels=1)
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
pred_class = np.argmax(predict_fn(sample.reshape(1, -1)))
|
| 137 |
+
feature_weights = exp.as_list(label=pred_class)
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
lime_results.append({
|
| 140 |
+
'sample_idx': int(idx),
|
| 141 |
+
'predicted_class': class_names[pred_class],
|
| 142 |
+
'top_features': [(fw[0], float(fw[1])) for fw in feature_weights]
|
| 143 |
+
})
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
for fw in feature_weights:
|
| 146 |
+
fname = fw[0].split(' ')[0]
|
| 147 |
+
all_top_features[fname] = all_top_features.get(fname, 0) + 1
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
if (i + 1) % 5 == 0:
|
| 150 |
+
print(f" Explained {i+1}/{n_instances} samples")
|
| 151 |
+
|
| 152 |
+
sorted_features = sorted(all_top_features.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True)
|
| 153 |
+
print(f"\n Top features by LIME frequency ({n_instances} samples):")
|
| 154 |
+
for fname, count in sorted_features[:10]:
|
| 155 |
+
print(f" {fname:35s}: appears in {count}/{n_instances} explanations")
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
# Save LIME feature frequency plot
|
| 158 |
+
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6))
|
| 159 |
+
top_lime = sorted_features[:15]
|
| 160 |
+
names = [f[0] for f in top_lime]
|
| 161 |
+
counts = [f[1] for f in top_lime]
|
| 162 |
+
plt.barh(range(len(names)), counts[::-1], color='coral')
|
| 163 |
+
plt.yticks(range(len(names)), names[::-1])
|
| 164 |
+
plt.xlabel(f'Frequency in top-10 (out of {n_instances} samples)')
|
| 165 |
+
plt.title(f'LIME Top Features - {model_name.upper()}')
|
| 166 |
+
plt.tight_layout()
|
| 167 |
+
plt.savefig(os.path.join(RESULTS_DIR, f'lime_frequency_{model_name}.png'), dpi=150)
|
| 168 |
+
plt.close()
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
return lime_results, sorted_features
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
def compare_shap_lime(shap_importance, lime_frequency, model_name):
|
| 174 |
+
"""Compare SHAP vs LIME feature rankings."""
|
| 175 |
+
from scipy.stats import spearmanr
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
shap_features = {f: i for i, (f, _) in enumerate(shap_importance[:20])}
|
| 178 |
+
lime_features = {f: i for i, (f, _) in enumerate(lime_frequency[:20])}
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
common = set(shap_features.keys()) & set(lime_features.keys())
|
| 181 |
+
|
| 182 |
+
if len(common) >= 5:
|
| 183 |
+
shap_ranks = [shap_features[f] for f in common]
|
| 184 |
+
lime_ranks = [lime_features[f] for f in common]
|
| 185 |
+
corr, p_value = spearmanr(shap_ranks, lime_ranks)
|
| 186 |
+
print(f"\n SHAP vs LIME rank correlation ({model_name}):")
|
| 187 |
+
print(f" Common features in top-20: {len(common)}")
|
| 188 |
+
print(f" Spearman correlation: {corr:.4f} (p={p_value:.4f})")
|
| 189 |
+
return {'spearman_corr': float(corr), 'p_value': float(p_value),
|
| 190 |
+
'n_common': len(common)}
|
| 191 |
+
else:
|
| 192 |
+
print(f" Too few common features ({len(common)}) for correlation")
|
| 193 |
+
return {'n_common': len(common)}
|
| 194 |
+
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
def main():
|
| 197 |
+
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test, le, scaler, meta = load_preprocessed()
|
| 198 |
+
class_names = meta['class_names']
|
| 199 |
+
|
| 200 |
+
print(f"Data loaded: {X_train.shape} train, {X_test.shape} test")
|
| 201 |
+
print(f"Classes: {class_names}")
|
| 202 |
+
|
| 203 |
+
all_xai_results = {}
|
| 204 |
+
|
| 205 |
+
models_to_analyze = [
|
| 206 |
+
('mlp', MLP_IDS),
|
| 207 |
+
('lstm', LSTM_IDS),
|
| 208 |
+
('cnn1d', CNN1D_IDS),
|
| 209 |
+
]
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
for model_name, model_class in models_to_analyze:
|
| 212 |
+
model_path = os.path.join(MODELS_DIR, f'{model_name}_best.pt')
|
| 213 |
+
if not os.path.exists(model_path):
|
| 214 |
+
print(f" Skipping {model_name} - no saved model found")
|
| 215 |
+
continue
|
| 216 |
+
|
| 217 |
+
model = load_model(model_class, model_name, num_classes=len(class_names))
|
| 218 |
+
|
| 219 |
+
shap_vals, shap_importance, exp_idx = run_shap_analysis(
|
| 220 |
+
model, model_name, X_train, X_test, class_names
|
| 221 |
+
)
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
lime_results, lime_frequency = run_lime_analysis(
|
| 224 |
+
model, model_name, X_train, X_test, class_names, n_instances=30
|
| 225 |
+
)
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
comparison = compare_shap_lime(shap_importance, lime_frequency, model_name)
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
all_xai_results[model_name] = {
|
| 230 |
+
'shap_top_features': [(f, float(v)) for f, v in shap_importance[:15]],
|
| 231 |
+
'lime_top_features': [(f, int(v)) for f, v in lime_frequency[:15]],
|
| 232 |
+
'shap_vs_lime': comparison,
|
| 233 |
+
}
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
with open(os.path.join(RESULTS_DIR, 'explainability_results.json'), 'w') as f:
|
| 236 |
+
json.dump(all_xai_results, f, indent=2)
|
| 237 |
+
|
| 238 |
+
print(f"\nExplainability analysis complete!")
|
| 239 |
+
print(f"Results saved to {RESULTS_DIR}/")
|
| 240 |
+
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
+
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
| 243 |
+
main()
|