Upload 2 files

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+---
+license: cc-by-4.0
+tags:
+- abstract-intro-prelim-method-exp-discussion
+- active
+- argumentative
+- endnote
+- enthusiastic
+- html
+- image-captioning
+- long-detailed
+- unstructured-narrative
+---
+
+# paper_016509527_image_captioning.md
+
+## Paper
+
+Topic: **image captioning**.
+
+- **Format**: html
+- **Citation style**: endnote
+- **Structure**: abstract intro prelim method exp discussion
+- **Writing style**: argumentative
+
+The full text is in `paper_016509527_image_captioning.md`.
+
+## Files
+
+- `paper_016509527_image_captioning.md` — main artifact of this repository
+
+## License
+
+See the license field above.

paper_016509527_image_captioning.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# Image Captioning
+
+## Abstract
+
+Despite significant progress, image captioning remains challenging. We argue that existing approaches overlook key aspects and propose an alternative. Our experiments demonstrate improvements over baseline approaches across multiple benchmarks. We release code and models for reproducibility.
+
+## 1. Introduction
+
+Multimodal learning has become a central topic in machine learning research. The ability to process and reason across different modalities — images, text, audio — has enabled applications ranging from image captioning to visual question answering.
+
+However, scaling multimodal models presents unique challenges. The interplay between modality-specific encoders and cross-modal fusion layers creates a complex design space. In this paper, we focus on image captioning and make the following contributions:
+
+- A novel approach to cross-modal feature alignment
+- An efficient training procedure that reduces computational cost
+- Comprehensive experiments across multiple datasets and settings
+
+## 2. Background
+
+Several lines of research inform our work. Vision-language pretraining methods such as CLIP and BLIP demonstrated that contrastive objectives on image-text pairs yield strong transferable representations. Subsequent work explored different fusion strategies, including cross-attention and co-attention mechanisms.
+
+On the efficiency side, recent progress in attention mechanisms — including linear attention, sparse attention, and flash attention — has made it feasible to train smaller models that remain competitive.
+
+## 3. Method
+
+### 3.1 Architecture
+
+Our model consists of two modality-specific encoders and a fusion module. The image encoder uses a patch-based embedding followed by Transformer blocks. The text encoder uses token embeddings with positional encoding. The fusion module combines features from both encoders using a cross-attention mechanism.
+
+### 3.2 Training Objective
+
+We employ a combination of contrastive and supervised objectives. The contrastive term aligns image and text representations in a shared embedding space, while the supervised term operates on task-specific labels.
+
+### 3.3 Implementation Details
+
+The model is trained with the AdamW optimizer using a cosine learning rate schedule. We apply gradient clipping and dropout regularization. Training runs for up to 30 epochs with early stopping.
+
+## 4. Experiments
+
+### 4.1 Setup
+
+We evaluate on standard multimodal benchmarks. All experiments use a batch size of 32 and train on a single GPU.
+
+### 4.2 Main Results
+
+| Method | Accuracy | Parameters |
+|--------|----------|------------|
+| Baseline | 78.2% | 12M |
+| Ours (small) | 82.5% | 8M |
+| Ours (base) | 85.3% | 15M |
+
+Our approach achieves better accuracy with fewer parameters than the baseline, demonstrating the effectiveness of our design choices.
+
+### 4.3 Ablation Study
+
+We ablate key components of our model to understand their individual contributions. Removing the fusion module drops accuracy by 4.1 points, confirming that cross-modal attention is important.
+
+## 5. Conclusion
+
+We presented an approach to image captioning that achieves competitive results with a compact architecture. Our experiments highlight the importance of efficient fusion strategies for small-scale multimodal models. Future work could explore extending our approach to additional modalities and larger-scale pretraining.
+
+## References
+
+[1] Radford, A. et al. Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. ICML, 2021.
+[2] Li, J. et al. BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training. ICML, 2022.
+[3] Dosovitskiy, A. et al. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition. ICLR, 2021.
+[4] Jaegle, A. et al. Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attention. ICML, 2021.
+[5] Yu, J. et al. CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Models. TMLR, 2022.