Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -15,6 +15,87 @@ This model classifies Tweets from X (formerly known as Twitter) into 'Spam' (1)
|
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This was fine-tuned on the [UtkMl's Twitter Spam Detection dataset](https://www.kaggle.com/c/twitter-spam/overview) with [`microsoft/deberta-v3-large`](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/deberta-v3-large) serving as the base model.
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
## Metrics
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Based on a 80-10-10 train-val-test split, the following results were obtained on the test set:
|
|
@@ -23,5 +104,6 @@ Based on a 80-10-10 train-val-test split, the following results were obtained on
|
|
| 23 |
- Recall: 0.9779
|
| 24 |
- F1-Score: 0.9779
|
| 25 |
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
## Questions?
|
| 27 |
contact me at alba@wustl.edu
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This was fine-tuned on the [UtkMl's Twitter Spam Detection dataset](https://www.kaggle.com/c/twitter-spam/overview) with [`microsoft/deberta-v3-large`](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/deberta-v3-large) serving as the base model.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
## How to use model
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
Here is some source code to get you started on using the model to classify spam Tweets.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
```{python}
|
| 23 |
+
def classify_texts(df, text_col, model_path="cja5553/deberta-Twitter-spam-classification", batch_size=24):
|
| 24 |
+
'''
|
| 25 |
+
Classifies texts as either "Quality" or "Spam" using a pre-trained sequence classification model.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
Parameters:
|
| 28 |
+
-----------
|
| 29 |
+
df : pandas.DataFrame
|
| 30 |
+
DataFrame containing the texts to classify.
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
text_col : str
|
| 33 |
+
Name of the column in that contains the text data to be classified.
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
model_path : str, default="cja5553/deberta-Twitter-spam-classification"
|
| 36 |
+
Path to the pre-trained model for sequence classification.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
batch_size : int, optional, default=24
|
| 39 |
+
Batch size for loading and processing data in batches. Adjust based on available GPU memory.
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
Returns:
|
| 42 |
+
--------
|
| 43 |
+
pandas.DataFrame
|
| 44 |
+
The original DataFrame with an additional column `spam_prediction`, containing the predicted labels ("Quality" or "Spam") for each text.
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
'''
|
| 47 |
+
# Load the tokenizer and model
|
| 48 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_path)
|
| 49 |
+
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(model_path).to("cuda")
|
| 50 |
+
model.eval() # Set model to evaluation mode
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
# Prepare the text data for classification
|
| 53 |
+
df["text"] = df[text_col].astype(str) # Ensure text is in string format
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
# Convert the data to a Hugging Face Dataset and tokenize
|
| 56 |
+
text_dataset = Dataset.from_pandas(df)
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
def tokenize_function(example):
|
| 59 |
+
return tokenizer(
|
| 60 |
+
example["text"],
|
| 61 |
+
padding="max_length",
|
| 62 |
+
truncation=True,
|
| 63 |
+
max_length=512
|
| 64 |
+
)
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
text_dataset = text_dataset.map(tokenize_function, batched=True)
|
| 67 |
+
text_dataset.set_format(type='torch', columns=['input_ids', 'attention_mask'])
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
# DataLoader for the text data
|
| 70 |
+
text_loader = DataLoader(text_dataset, batch_size=batch_size)
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
# Make predictions
|
| 73 |
+
predictions = []
|
| 74 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 75 |
+
for batch in tqdm_notebook(text_loader):
|
| 76 |
+
input_ids = batch['input_ids'].to("cuda")
|
| 77 |
+
attention_mask = batch['attention_mask'].to("cuda")
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
# Forward pass
|
| 80 |
+
outputs = model(input_ids=input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)
|
| 81 |
+
logits = outputs.logits
|
| 82 |
+
preds = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1).cpu().numpy() # Get predicted labels
|
| 83 |
+
predictions.extend(preds)
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
# Map predictions to labels
|
| 86 |
+
id2label = {0: "Quality", 1: "Spam"}
|
| 87 |
+
predicted_labels = [id2label[pred] for pred in predictions]
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
# Add predictions to the original DataFrame
|
| 90 |
+
df["spam_prediction"] = predicted_labels
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
return df
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
spam_df_classification = classify_texts(df, "text_col")
|
| 95 |
+
print(spam_df_classification)
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
```
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
## Metrics
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
Based on a 80-10-10 train-val-test split, the following results were obtained on the test set:
|
|
|
|
| 104 |
- Recall: 0.9779
|
| 105 |
- F1-Score: 0.9779
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
## Questions?
|
| 109 |
contact me at alba@wustl.edu
|