| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| from . import c_ast |
|
|
|
|
| def fix_switch_cases(switch_node): |
| """ The 'case' statements in a 'switch' come out of parsing with one |
| child node, so subsequent statements are just tucked to the parent |
| Compound. Additionally, consecutive (fall-through) case statements |
| come out messy. This is a peculiarity of the C grammar. The following: |
| |
| switch (myvar) { |
| case 10: |
| k = 10; |
| p = k + 1; |
| return 10; |
| case 20: |
| case 30: |
| return 20; |
| default: |
| break; |
| } |
| |
| Creates this tree (pseudo-dump): |
| |
| Switch |
| ID: myvar |
| Compound: |
| Case 10: |
| k = 10 |
| p = k + 1 |
| return 10 |
| Case 20: |
| Case 30: |
| return 20 |
| Default: |
| break |
| |
| The goal of this transform is to fix this mess, turning it into the |
| following: |
| |
| Switch |
| ID: myvar |
| Compound: |
| Case 10: |
| k = 10 |
| p = k + 1 |
| return 10 |
| Case 20: |
| Case 30: |
| return 20 |
| Default: |
| break |
| |
| A fixed AST node is returned. The argument may be modified. |
| """ |
| assert isinstance(switch_node, c_ast.Switch) |
| if not isinstance(switch_node.stmt, c_ast.Compound): |
| return switch_node |
|
|
| |
| |
| new_compound = c_ast.Compound([], switch_node.stmt.coord) |
|
|
| |
| last_case = None |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| for child in (switch_node.stmt.block_items or []): |
| if isinstance(child, (c_ast.Case, c_ast.Default)): |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| new_compound.block_items.append(child) |
| _extract_nested_case(child, new_compound.block_items) |
| last_case = new_compound.block_items[-1] |
| else: |
| |
| |
| if last_case is None: |
| new_compound.block_items.append(child) |
| else: |
| last_case.stmts.append(child) |
|
|
| switch_node.stmt = new_compound |
| return switch_node |
|
|
|
|
| def _extract_nested_case(case_node, stmts_list): |
| """ Recursively extract consecutive Case statements that are made nested |
| by the parser and add them to the stmts_list. |
| """ |
| if isinstance(case_node.stmts[0], (c_ast.Case, c_ast.Default)): |
| stmts_list.append(case_node.stmts.pop()) |
| _extract_nested_case(stmts_list[-1], stmts_list) |
|
|
|
|
| def fix_atomic_specifiers(decl): |
| """ Atomic specifiers like _Atomic(type) are unusually structured, |
| conferring a qualifier upon the contained type. |
| |
| This function fixes a decl with atomic specifiers to have a sane AST |
| structure, by removing spurious Typename->TypeDecl pairs and attaching |
| the _Atomic qualifier in the right place. |
| """ |
| |
| |
| while True: |
| decl, found = _fix_atomic_specifiers_once(decl) |
| if not found: |
| break |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| typ = decl |
| while not isinstance(typ, c_ast.TypeDecl): |
| try: |
| typ = typ.type |
| except AttributeError: |
| return decl |
| if '_Atomic' in typ.quals and '_Atomic' not in decl.quals: |
| decl.quals.append('_Atomic') |
| if typ.declname is None: |
| typ.declname = decl.name |
|
|
| return decl |
|
|
|
|
| def _fix_atomic_specifiers_once(decl): |
| """ Performs one 'fix' round of atomic specifiers. |
| Returns (modified_decl, found) where found is True iff a fix was made. |
| """ |
| parent = decl |
| grandparent = None |
| node = decl.type |
| while node is not None: |
| if isinstance(node, c_ast.Typename) and '_Atomic' in node.quals: |
| break |
| try: |
| grandparent = parent |
| parent = node |
| node = node.type |
| except AttributeError: |
| |
| |
| |
| return decl, False |
|
|
| assert isinstance(parent, c_ast.TypeDecl) |
| grandparent.type = node.type |
| if '_Atomic' not in node.type.quals: |
| node.type.quals.append('_Atomic') |
| return decl, True |
|
|