Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -17,162 +17,34 @@ The end-to-end workflow—**Phase 1: compression + indexing, Phase 2: retrieval
|
|
| 17 |
<em>Figure 1. Overview of the **Comp4Cls** framework. The system operates in two phases: (i) documents with predefined class labels are semantically compressed, embedded, and stored in a vector database; (ii) when a new query arrives, it is compressed and used to retrieve the top-$k$ most similar documents from the vector store. The large language model (LLM) then determines the final class label based on the retrieved context. Finally, the compressed query and its assigned label are stored back into the database, enabling downstream services such as document categorization, semantic search, and TL;DR summarization.</em>
|
| 18 |
</p>
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
## Model Details
|
| 21 |
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 29 |
-
- **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 30 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 31 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 32 |
-
- **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
- **
|
| 39 |
-
- **
|
| 40 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
### Direct Use
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
## Training Details
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
### Training Data
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
- **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
## Evaluation
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 126 |
-
|
| 127 |
-
#### Metrics
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 130 |
-
|
| 131 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
### Results
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
#### Summary
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 148 |
-
|
| 149 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 150 |
-
|
| 151 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 154 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 155 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 156 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 157 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 168 |
-
|
| 169 |
-
#### Hardware
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
-
#### Software
|
| 174 |
-
|
| 175 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
## Citation [optional]
|
| 178 |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
<em>Figure 1. Overview of the **Comp4Cls** framework. The system operates in two phases: (i) documents with predefined class labels are semantically compressed, embedded, and stored in a vector database; (ii) when a new query arrives, it is compressed and used to retrieve the top-$k$ most similar documents from the vector store. The large language model (LLM) then determines the final class label based on the retrieved context. Finally, the compressed query and its assigned label are stored back into the database, enabling downstream services such as document categorization, semantic search, and TL;DR summarization.</em>
|
| 18 |
</p>
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
# Key Features
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
* **Entity-centric Semantic Compression**
|
| 24 |
+
Two-stage prompting (entity extraction → selective rewriting) produces concise, structured summaries that retain label-relevant semantics while removing redundancy. The compressor exposes an explicit **compression ratio** to match accuracy/latency budgets.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
* **Retrieval-Augmented Classification (RAG) with Short Contexts**
|
| 27 |
+
Operates on compressed texts for both the query and neighbors, reducing context length and enabling **broader top-k** without “lost-in-the-middle” degradation.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
+
* **Small-Model, Big-Model Performance**
|
| 30 |
+
With **~20% compression**, a **4B** backbone achieves or exceeds the accuracy of **8B–14B** models across domains and taxonomy levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+
* **Provable Efficiency Gains**
|
| 33 |
+
Compression reduces input tokens by **~50%** on average while maintaining semantic similarity; retrieval accuracy remains near full-text levels.
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
* **Scales to Real-World, Heterogeneous Corpora**
|
| 36 |
+
Trained/evaluated on large bilingual datasets spanning **papers, patents, and R&D reports** with hierarchical, multi-label taxonomies; robust under domain shift and taxonomy changes.
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
+
* **Production-minded Latency/Throughput**
|
| 39 |
+
Shorter prompts cut classification-stage latency; compression allows higher **top-k (≈20–30)** before context saturation.
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
* **Vector DB-Ready Artifacts**
|
| 42 |
+
Outputs compressed texts + embeddings that plug into standard ANN indices (e.g., HNSW) for high-throughput retrieval in enterprise knowledge systems.
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
* **Beyond Classification**
|
| 45 |
+
The compressed representations support downstream **semantic search**, **TL;DR summaries**, and **knowledge organization** tasks out of the box.
|
| 46 |
|
|
|
|
| 47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
## Citation [optional]
|
| 50 |
|