Update Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-05-19)

EVAL_REPORT.md

@@ -1,114 +1,134 @@
 # Automated MNLP evaluation report
 
-- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-taadmin/general_knowledge_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-taadmin/general_knowledge_model)
-- **Owner(s):** group **taadmin**
-- **Generated at:** 2026-05-03T02:20:59+00:00 (UTC)
+- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-baseline/general_knowledge_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-baseline/general_knowledge_model)
+- **Owner(s):** group **baseline**
+- **Generated at:** 2026-05-19T03:22:52+00:00 (UTC)
 - **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
 
 _This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
 
 ## Summary
 
-| Benchmark | Metric | Accuracy | # problems | Status |
-|---|---|---:|---:|---|
-| Math | `pass@8` | — | — | not run |
-| Knowledge | `pass@1` | 0.1500 | 20 | ok |
-| Multilingual | `pass@1` | — | — | not run |
-| Safety | `pass@1` | — | — | not run |
+| Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
+|---|---:|---|
+| Math | — | not run |
+| Knowledge | 0.2500 | ok |
+| Multilingual | — | not run |
+| Safety | — | not run |
 
 ## Sample completions
 
-### Knowledge
+_Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For multi-completion problems, only one completion is shown per sample._
 
-**Correct** (2 shown)
+### Knowledge
 
-- **prompt** (truncated): `Suppose a spin-half particle is prepared in the state \(0.5|\uparrow\rangle+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}|\downarrow\rangle\). Given that \(|\uparrow\rangle\) and \(|\downarrow\rangle\) are eigenstates of \(\sigma_z\), determine the expectation value, rounded to one decimal place, of \(10\sigma_z+5\sigma_x\). Here, the symbols have their usual meanings.
+**Correct** (1 shown)
 
-Choices:
-A. 1.65
-B. -0.7
-C. 0.85
-D. -1.4`
 - **reference**: `B`
-- **extracted answers** (1/1 correct, ✓):
-  - `B`
-- **raw completions**:
-  - completion 1:
+- **overall** (1/1 completions correct)
+- **extracted** (✓): `B`
+- **completion**:
+
     ```text
     <think>
-    Okay, so I need to find the expectation value of the operator $10\sigma_z + 5\sigma_x$ for a spin-half particle in the state $0.5|\uparrow\rangle + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}|\downarrow\rangle$. Let me start by recalling some basic concepts about quantum mechanics and spin operators.
+    Okay, let's try to figure out which investment is wiser for Mr. James. So, he's in the 50% income tax bracket. He has two options: corporate bonds paying 8% interest or municipal bonds paying 4.5% interest. The question is asking which one is better.
     
-    First, the Pauli matrices $\sigma_z$ and $\sigma_x$ are the matrices for the spin operators in the z and x directions, respectively. For a spin-1/2 particle, the eigenstates of $\sigma_z$ are $|\uparrow\rangle$ and $|\downarrow\rangle$, which are the basis states. The expectation value of an operator is calculated by taking the inner product of the state with the operator multiplied by the state, right?
+    First, I remember that corporate bonds are generally taxed at the corporate tax rate, and then the interest income is also taxed at the indi
     
-    So, th...
-    ```
-
-- **prompt** (truncated): `Which one of the following statements regarding the molecular biology of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) is not correct?
-
-Choices:
-A. Programmed ribosomal frameshifting creates two polyproteins near to 5` end of the genome by moving back by 1 nucleotide with the help of slippery nucleotides, and pseudoknot. The SARS-CoV-2 programmed ribosomal frameshifting mostly has t...`
-- **reference**: `C`
-- **extracted answers** (1/1 correct, ✓):
-  - `C`
-- **raw completions**:
-  - completion 1:
-    ```text
-    <think>
-    Okay, let's tackle this question. So, the task is to find which statement about the molecular biology of SARS-CoV-2 is not correct. The options are A, B, C, D. Let me go through each one step by step.
+    ... [truncated 713 chars] ...
+    
+    ter. Therefore, the answer should be municipal bonds. Let me check the choices again. Choice B is municipal bonds. So the answer is B.
+    </think>
+    
+    To determine which investment is wiser for Mr. James, we need to compare the net returns of the two options, considering the tax implications.
+    
+    ---
+    
+    ### Key Information:
+    
+    - **Mr. James is in the 50% income tax bracket.**
+    - **Corporate bonds** pay **8% interest**.
+    - **Municipal bonds** pay **4.5% interest** and are **tax-exempt**.
+    
+    ---
+    
+    ### Step-by-Step Analysis:
+    
+    1. **Corporate Bonds:**
+       - The **interest income** is taxed at 50%.
+       - Net return = 8% × (1 - 0.50) = 4%.
+       - So, the net return after taxes is **4%**.
+    
+    2. **Municipal Bonds:**
+       - The **interest income** is **tax-exempt**.
+       - Net return = 4.5% (since no taxes are paid on this income).
+       - So, the net return is **4.5%**.
+    
+    ---
+    
+    ### Conclusion:
+    
+    Although corporate bonds offer a slightly higher interest rate (8% vs. 4.5%), the **tax implications** reduce the net return significantly for corporate bonds. In contrast, **municipal bonds** provide a **tax-free return** of 4.5%, which is higher than the 4% after taxes from corporate bonds.
+    
+    ---
     
-    Starting with option A: It talks about programmed ribosomal frameshifting in SARS-CoV-2. The statement says that it creates two polyproteins near the 5' end by moving back by 1 nucleotide with slippery nucleotides and pseudoknots. Also, it mentions that the SARS-CoV-2 frameshifting is similar to SARS-CoV. I remember that both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 use similar mechanisms for frameshifting, like the -1 frameshift signals. So this seems correct. So A might be correct.
+    ### Final Answer:
     
-    Option B: It says...
+    $$
+    \boxed{B}
+    $$
     ```
 
-**Incorrect** (2 shown)
+**Incorrect** (1 shown)
 
-- **prompt** (truncated): `An unknown organic compound has been synthesized, and its 1H NMR spectrum gave the following data:
-1H NMR: chemical reference (ppm): 7.0 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 5.5 (1H, dq), 2.1 (3H, s), 1.6 (3H, d)
-Determine which of the following compounds it is: Cis-propenyl acetate, Trans-propenyl acetate, Cis-butenyl acetate, or Trans-butenyl acetate.
+- **reference**: `C`
+- **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
+- **extracted** (✗): `<no answer>`
+- **completion**:
 
-Choices:
-A. Cis-propenyl acetate
-B. Cis-butenyl acetate
-C....`
-- **reference**: `D`
-- **extracted answers** (0/1 correct, ✗):
-  - `<no answer>`
-- **raw completions**:
-  - completion 1:
     ```text
     <think>
-    Okay, let's try to figure out which compound this is. The NMR data given is for an unknown organic compound with the following peaks:
+    Okay, let's try to figure out this problem. So, we have water flowing through a pipe with some given parameters, and we need to find the heat transfer coefficient using Sieder and Tate's formula and Hausen's formula. The options are given, but I need to work through it step by step.
     
-    - 7.0 (1H, d, J=16.0 Hz)
-    - 5.5 (1H, dq)
-    - 2.1 (3H, s)
-    - 1.6 (3H, d)
+    First, let me recall what I know about forced convection and heat transfer coefficients. The basic formula
     
-    First, I need to recall what each of these NMR peaks represents. The 2.1 ppm peak is a singlet at 2.1, which is probably a methyl group (since it's a singlet and the rest of the molecule is probably not splitting it). The 1.6 ppm peak is a doublet, but wait, the third peak is 1.6 (3H, d). Wait, the 1.6 is a doublet? Wait, no. Wait, the data is:
+    ... [truncated 822 chars] ...
     
-    Wait, the user wrote:
+    mula is:
     
-    "1H NMR: chemical reference (ppm): 7.0 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 5.5 (1H, dq), 2.1 (3H, s), 1.6 (3H, d)"
+    Nu = 0.023 * Re^0.8 * Pr^0.33
     
-    So the peaks ar...
-    ```
-
-- **prompt** (truncated): `Which of the following starting material(s) would be used to prepare methyl 2-propyl-1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydronaphthalene-1-carboxylate?
-
-Choices:
-A. methyl (2E,4E,10Z)-tetradeca-2,4,10-trienoate
-B. methyl (2E,8E,10E)-tetradeca-2,8,10-trienoate
-C. Cyclohexene and methyl 2,3-dimethylenehexanoate
-D. 1-vinylcyclohex-1-ene and methyl hex-2-ynoate`
-- **reference**: `B`
-- **extracted answers** (0/1 correct, ✗):
-  - `<no answer>`
-- **raw completions**:
-  - completion 1:
-    ```text
-    <think>
-    Okay, let's try to figure out which starting material is used to prepare methyl 2-propyl-1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydronaphthalene-1-carboxylate. Hmm, first, I need to understand the structure of the compound in question. 
+    But this is the same. Therefore, the answer is the same. But since the options are different, I must have made a mistake.
+    
+    Wait, maybe the Sieder and Tate formula is:
+    
+    Nu = 0.023 * Re^0.8 * Pr^0.33
+    
+    But Hausen's formula is:
+    
+    Nu = 0.023 * Re^0.8 * Pr^0.33
+    
+    But that's the same. Therefore, the answer is the same. But the options are different. Therefore, I need to check the problem again.
+    
+    Wait, the problem says that the flow is laminar. So, the Nusselt number is given by the Sieder-Tate formula. Let me try to calculate the value step by step.
+    
+    First, calculate the Reynolds number. The Reynolds number is Re = (v * D * N) / μ, where v is the velocity, D is the diameter, N is the number of Reynolds, and μ is the dynamic viscosity. Wait, no, Re = (v * D) / ν, where ν is the kinematic viscosity.
+    
+    But I need to find the velocity first. The volume flow rate Q is given by Q = A * v, where A is the cross-sectional area of the pipe.
+    
+    Given:
+    
+    - Diameter D = 0.0492 ft
+    
+    - Length L = 3.28 ft
+    
+    - Flow rate Q = 1.27 ft³/hr
+    
+    So, the cross-sectional area A = π * (D/2)^2 = π * (0.0492/2)^2.
+    
+    First, calculate the cross-sectional area:
+    
+    D/2 = 0.0246 ft
     
-    The name given is methyl 2-propyl-1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydronaphthalene-1-carboxylate. Let me break that down. The parent ring is naphthalene, which has two fused benzene rings. The numbering is 1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a. So, the structure is a naphthalene ring with eight hydrogen atoms, but here it's substituted with certain groups. The carboxylate group is at position 1, and there are methyl and propyl groups on positions 2 and 3. Wait, the name mentions "2-propyl" so may...
+    A = π * (0.
     ```