Update Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-06-06)
Browse files- EVAL_REPORT.md +45 -28
EVAL_REPORT.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,16 +2,22 @@
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-bilko/math_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-bilko/math_model)
|
| 4 |
- **Owner(s):** group **bilko**
|
| 5 |
-
- **Generated at:** 2026-06-
|
| 6 |
- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
## Summary
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
| Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
|
| 13 |
|---|---:|---|
|
| 14 |
-
| Math | 0.
|
| 15 |
| Knowledge | — | not run |
|
| 16 |
| Multilingual | — | not run |
|
| 17 |
| Safety | — | not run |
|
|
@@ -24,58 +30,69 @@ _Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For mu
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
**Correct** (1 shown)
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
- **reference**: `
|
| 28 |
- **overall** (2/8 completions correct)
|
| 29 |
-
- **extracted** (✓): `
|
| 30 |
- **completion**:
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
```text
|
| 33 |
-
Okay, so I need to
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-
First, let
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
... [truncated
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-
,
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
```
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
**Incorrect** (1 shown)
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
- **reference**: `
|
| 55 |
- **overall** (0/8 completions correct)
|
| 56 |
-
- **extracted** (✗): `
|
| 57 |
- **completion**:
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
```text
|
| 60 |
-
Okay, so I
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
... [truncated 823 chars] ...
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
- Consider \( h(q) = c \). For this to satisfy the condition, \( \frac{c + a}{b} \) must be an integer for all \( a \in \mathbb{Z} \) and \( b \in \mathbb{N} \). This is only possible if \( c = 0 \), leading to the constant function \( h(q) = 0 \).
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
- For \( h(q) = q \), substituting into the condition confirms the equality holds for all \( x \), \( a \), and \( b \).
|
| 71 |
-
- For \( h(q) = 0 \), substituting into the condition confirms the equality holds for all \( x \), \( a \), and \( b \).
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
\[
|
| 79 |
-
\
|
| 80 |
\]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
```
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-bilko/math_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-bilko/math_model)
|
| 4 |
- **Owner(s):** group **bilko**
|
| 5 |
+
- **Generated at:** 2026-06-06T17:20:53+00:00 (UTC)
|
| 6 |
- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
## Evaluated checkpoint
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
- **Commit:** [`b63a9ed`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-bilko/math_model/commit/b63a9edf27f2abbede2deed75d3ebd6ae87b17b4)
|
| 13 |
+
- **Message:** GRPO ontop of SFT model name: grpo_openr1__qwen3_maxtokens_lr2e-6_checkpoint-450_merged
|
| 14 |
+
- **Committed:** 2026-06-04T14:39:53+00:00
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
## Summary
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
| Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
|
| 19 |
|---|---:|---|
|
| 20 |
+
| Math | 0.4400 | ok |
|
| 21 |
| Knowledge | — | not run |
|
| 22 |
| Multilingual | — | not run |
|
| 23 |
| Safety | — | not run |
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
**Correct** (1 shown)
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
- **reference**: `305`
|
| 34 |
- **overall** (2/8 completions correct)
|
| 35 |
+
- **extracted** (✓): `305`
|
| 36 |
- **completion**:
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
```text
|
| 39 |
+
Okay, so I have this problem here where I need to find the set S of positive integers n between 99 and 206, inclusive, such that the numbers 1, 2, ..., 2n can be partitioned into n pairs where the differences within each pair are exactly 1, 2, ..., n. Then, I need to find the smallest and largest elements in S and add them together. Hmm, let me try to wrap my head around this.
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
First, let's parse
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
... [truncated 822 chars] ...
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
that the only possible n are 99 and 206, and their sum is 305. This might be a trick question where the answer is simply 99 + 206 = 305. But why?
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
Wait, perhaps the problem is related to the fact that 2n -1 must be divisible by n +1. For n=99, 2*99 -1=197, and 99 +1=100. 197 divided by 100 is 1.97, not an integer. For n=206, 2*206 -1=411, and 206 +1=207. 411 divided by 207 is 2. So, 207*2=414, which is more than 411. So, 411 is not divisible by 207. Hence, no.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
Alternatively, perhaps the problem is related to the fact that 2n must be one more than a multiple of n +1. For n=99, 2*99=198, and 198 divided by 99 +1=100 is 1.98. Not an integer. For n=206, 412 divided by 207≈1.98. Not an integer. So, no.
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
Given that I've spent a significant amount of time on this and haven't found a mathematical condition that fits the given range, I think the answer must be 99 + 206 = 305. Perhaps the problem is designed such that only n=99 and n=206 satisfy the condition, and their sum is 305. Therefore, the final answer is 305.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
**Final Answer**
|
| 54 |
+
\boxed{305}
|
| 55 |
+
</think>
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
+
To solve the problem, we need to determine the set \(S\) of positive integers \(n\) such that \(99 \leq n \leq 206\) and the numbers \(
|
| 58 |
```
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
**Incorrect** (1 shown)
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
+
- **reference**: `60750, 854130, 854970`
|
| 63 |
- **overall** (0/8 completions correct)
|
| 64 |
+
- **extracted** (✗): `60750`
|
| 65 |
- **completion**:
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
```text
|
| 68 |
+
Okay, so I need to solve this problem where there's a function h from the natural numbers to the natural numbers excluding 1. The condition given is that for every n in natural numbers, h(n) + h(n+1) = h(n+2)h(n+3) - 840. And I have to find all possible values that the sum from i=1 to 2025 of h(i) can take. Hmm, interesting. Let me try to break this down step by step.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
First, let me understand the
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
... [truncated 822 chars] ...
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
that can occur for the sum \( \sum_{i=1}^{2025} h(i) \).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
First, we test if the function \( h(n) \) is constant. Suppose \( h(n) = c \) for all \( n \). Substituting into the given equation:
|
| 77 |
+
\[
|
| 78 |
+
c + c = c \cdot c - 840 \implies 2c = c^2 - 840 \implies c^2 - 2c - 840 = 0.
|
| 79 |
+
\]
|
| 80 |
+
Solving this quadratic equation, we find:
|
| 81 |
+
\[
|
| 82 |
+
c = \frac{2 \pm \sqrt{4 + 3360}}{2} = \frac{2 \pm 58}{2}.
|
| 83 |
+
\]
|
| 84 |
+
The positive solution is \( c = 30 \). Checking \( h(n) = 30 \), we verify:
|
| 85 |
+
\[
|
| 86 |
+
30 + 30 = 30 \cdot 30 - 840 \implies 60 = 900 - 840 \implies 60 = 60.
|
| 87 |
+
\]
|
| 88 |
+
Thus, \( h(n) = 30 \) is a valid constant solution.
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
+
Next, we check if there could be non-constant solutions. Assume \( h(n) \) is not constant. Using the functional equation and induction, we find that any deviation from 30 leads to inconsistencies. For example, if \( h(1) \neq 30 \), the subsequent terms would not satisfy the equation unless they are also 30. This leads to a contradiction unless all terms are 30.
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
+
Thus, the only solution is the constant function \( h(n) = 30 \). The sum from \( i = 1 \) to \( 2025 \) is:
|
| 93 |
\[
|
| 94 |
+
\sum_{i=1}^{2025} 30 = 2025 \times 30 = 60750.
|
| 95 |
\]
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
The only value that can occur for \( \sum_{i=1}^{2025} h(i) \) is \(\boxed{60750}\).
|
| 98 |
```
|