Update Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-06-11)
Browse files- EVAL_REPORT.md +33 -27
EVAL_REPORT.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,23 +2,23 @@
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-ma-que/general_knowledge_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-ma-que/general_knowledge_model)
|
| 4 |
- **Owner(s):** group **ma-que**
|
| 5 |
-
- **Generated at:** 2026-06-
|
| 6 |
- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** β you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
## Evaluated checkpoint
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
- **Commit:** [`
|
| 13 |
-
- **Message:**
|
| 14 |
-
- **Committed:** 2026-06-
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
## Summary
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
| Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
|
| 19 |
|---|---:|---|
|
| 20 |
| Math | β | not run |
|
| 21 |
-
| Knowledge | 0.
|
| 22 |
| Multilingual | β | not run |
|
| 23 |
| Safety | β | not run |
|
| 24 |
|
|
@@ -30,50 +30,56 @@ _Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For mu
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
**Correct** (1 shown)
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-
- **reference**: `
|
| 34 |
- **overall** (1/1 completions correct)
|
| 35 |
-
- **extracted** (β): `
|
| 36 |
- **completion**:
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
```text
|
| 39 |
<think>
|
| 40 |
-
Okay, let's
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
First,
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
... [truncated
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
</think>
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
<answer>The
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
-
- **Alzheimer's disease** is strongly associated with the degeneration of cholinergic neurons, leading to severe memory loss and cognitive decline. This is a direct example of a disorder linked to acetylcholine research.
|
| 52 |
-
|
| 53 |
-
- **Parkinson's disease** involves the loss of dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra, but acetylcholine is also implicated in the progression of the disease and symptoms like tremors and rigidity.
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
-
However, the question asks which disorder has "research suggested may be linked" to acetylcholine. While both Alzheimer's and Parkinson's are valid answers, **Alzheimer's disease** is a more well-established example in this context. Parkinson's disease, though related to acetylcholine, is primarily linked to dopamine.
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-
\boxed{
|
| 58 |
```
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
**Incorrect** (1 shown)
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
- **reference**: `
|
| 63 |
- **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
|
| 64 |
-
- **extracted** (β): `
|
| 65 |
- **completion**:
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
```text
|
| 68 |
<think>
|
| 69 |
-
Okay, let's
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-
.
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
-
\boxed{
|
| 79 |
```
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
- **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-ma-que/general_knowledge_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-ma-que/general_knowledge_model)
|
| 4 |
- **Owner(s):** group **ma-que**
|
| 5 |
+
- **Generated at:** 2026-06-11T06:23:10+00:00 (UTC)
|
| 6 |
- **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
_This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** β you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
## Evaluated checkpoint
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+
- **Commit:** [`ea02e87`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-ma-que/general_knowledge_model/commit/ea02e87444e4cbb2130a13dcff064cab2582098f)
|
| 13 |
+
- **Message:** Remove model card for repo consistency
|
| 14 |
+
- **Committed:** 2026-06-10T19:04:19+00:00
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
## Summary
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
| Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
|
| 19 |
|---|---:|---|
|
| 20 |
| Math | β | not run |
|
| 21 |
+
| Knowledge | 0.3900 | ok |
|
| 22 |
| Multilingual | β | not run |
|
| 23 |
| Safety | β | not run |
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
**Correct** (1 shown)
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
- **reference**: `G`
|
| 34 |
- **overall** (1/1 completions correct)
|
| 35 |
+
- **extracted** (β): `G`
|
| 36 |
- **completion**:
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
```text
|
| 39 |
<think>
|
| 40 |
+
Okay, let's try to figure out this question. So, the scenario is a 3-year-old girl in preschool who, on her first day, is holding her mom's hand and watching other kids play. Then, after some encouragement, she starts helping another child with a puzzle. The question is asking which temperament style in the Thomas and Chess model this child has.
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
+
First, I need to recall what the Thomas and
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
... [truncated 822 chars] ...
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
+
interacting much. Then, after encouragement, she helps. So she's a 3-year-old who is a slow to warm up (G), which is a type of difficult temperament. So the answer is G. But the options are labeled as A-J, so the answer is G. Alternatively, maybe the answer is I (Difficult) because she's a difficult child. But the slow to warm up is a subpoint. So the answer is G. But I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, maybe the answer is H (Passive), but that's more withdrawal. The scenario says she starts helping after encouragement, so maybe she's adapting. So the answer is G (Slow to warm up) as the main style. I think that's the most likely answer.
|
| 47 |
</think>
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
<answer>The 3-year-old girl in the scenario is described as holding her mother's hand and observing others before starting to help a child after encouragement. This suggests she is initially hesitant to engage with the environment, indicating a slow-to-warm-up temperament. In the Thomas and Chess model, the slow-to-warm-up subtype is a type of difficult temperament. While passive (H) is another difficult subpoint, the scenario highlights her eventual adaptation, aligning more closely with the slow-to-warm-up style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
\boxed{G}</answer>
|
| 52 |
```
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
**Incorrect** (1 shown)
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
- **reference**: `I`
|
| 57 |
- **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
|
| 58 |
+
- **extracted** (β): `B`
|
| 59 |
- **completion**:
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
```text
|
| 62 |
<think>
|
| 63 |
+
Okay, let's tackle this question step by step. The question is about executory contracts and which statement is the least correct. The options are A to J, and I need to figure out which one is incorrect.
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
+
First, I need to recall what an executory contract is. From what I remember, an executory contract is one where one or both parties still have obligations to perform. So, there's no compl
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
+
... [truncated 823 chars] ...
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
ully executed contract exists when neither party has remaining obligations.
|
| 70 |
+
- **B.** Incorrect. If one party has completed performance and the other has not begun, the contract is **completed**, not executory.
|
| 71 |
+
- **C.** Correct. An executory contract is when one party has performed and the other has not yet begun.
|
| 72 |
+
- **D.** Correct. A wholly executory contract involves obligations exchanged without performance.
|
| 73 |
+
- **E.** Correct. Partially executed means at least one party has begun performance.
|
| 74 |
+
- **F.** Correct. Executory contract when both parties have yet to begin.
|
| 75 |
+
- **G.** Correct. Fully executed when both parties have completed performance.
|
| 76 |
+
- **H.** Correct. Partially executed when both have begun but not completed.
|
| 77 |
+
- **I.** Incorrect. If one party has completed performance, the contract is done, not executory.
|
| 78 |
+
- **J.** Correct. Executed when both have fully performed.
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
**Key Analysis**:
|
| 81 |
+
- **B** incorrectly describes a completed contract, not an executory one.
|
| 82 |
+
- **I** also incorrectly describes a completed contract. However, **B** is the least correct because it directly contradicts the definition of an executory contract.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
+
**Answer**: \boxed{B}</answer>
|
| 85 |
```
|