zechen-nlp commited on
Commit
f99d335
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): e8f826f

Update Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-06-03)

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. EVAL_REPORT.md +60 -81
EVAL_REPORT.md CHANGED
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
 
3
  - **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-momy/math_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-momy/math_model)
4
  - **Owner(s):** group **momy**
5
- - **Generated at:** 2026-06-01T06:13:57+00:00 (UTC)
6
  - **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
7
 
8
  _This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ _This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — yo
11
 
12
  | Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
13
  |---|---:|---|
14
- | Math | 0.3700 | ok |
15
  | Knowledge | — | not run |
16
  | Multilingual | — | not run |
17
  | Safety | — | not run |
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@ _Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For mu
25
  **Correct** (1 shown)
26
 
27
  - **reference**: `194`
28
- - **overall** (6/8 completions correct)
29
  - **extracted** (✓): `194`
30
  - **completion**:
31
 
32
  ```text
33
- We are given a $194 \times 194$ board and asked to find the **least positive integer $k$** such that we can choose $k$ cells to mark, and there exists a **tiling** of the board with **$1 \times 2$ and $2 \times 1$ dominoes**, such that **every domino contains at most one marked cell**.
34
 
35
  ---
36
 
@@ -38,152 +38,131 @@ _Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For mu
38
 
39
  We are to find the **minimum number of marked cells** such that:
40
 
41
- - The
42
 
43
  ... [truncated 821 chars] ...
44
 
45
- lls.
46
- - $M$ is a **matching** in the graph (i.e., no two marked cells are adjacent).
47
- - Then, **every perfect matching** can contain at most one marked cell.
48
 
49
- This is equivalent to saying that **$M$ is a matching** in the graph, and **every perfect matching** intersects $M$ in at most one vertex.
50
 
51
- This is a **matching covering** problem with a **constraint**.
52
 
53
  ---
54
 
55
- ### Step 10: Use the Concept of a "Matching" and "Covering"
56
 
57
- Let’s consider the following:
58
 
59
- - The **maximum number of marked cells** such that **every perfect matching** contains at most one of them is the **maximum matching** in the graph.
 
60
 
61
- This is a known result in **matching theory**.
 
 
 
 
 
 
62
 
63
  ---
64
 
65
- ### Step 11: Final Answer
66
 
67
- We are to find the **minimum** $k$ such that **every perfect matching** of the board has **at most one marked cell**.
68
 
69
- This is equivalent to finding the **maximum matching** in the graph, and then placing $k$ marked cells such that **no perfect matching contains more than one of them**.
 
 
70
 
71
- This is a known result in **matching theory**.
72
 
73
  ---
74
 
75
- ### Final Answer:
76
 
77
  $$
78
  \boxed{194}
79
  $$
80
-
81
- This is the **minimum number of marked cells** such that **every tiling** of the board has **at most one marked cell per domino**.
82
  ```
83
 
84
  **Incorrect** (1 shown)
85
 
86
- - **reference**: `3069`
87
  - **overall** (0/8 completions correct)
88
- - **extracted** (✗): `1168`
89
  - **completion**:
90
 
91
  ```text
92
- We are given a function $ s_k(n) $, which is the **sum of the digits** in the base-$k$ representation of $ n $, and we are told that a positive integer $ n $ is called a **digiroot** if:
93
 
94
  $$
95
- s_2(n) = \sqrt{s_4(n)}
96
- $$
97
-
98
- We are to find the **sum of all digiroots less than 1000**.
99
-
100
- ---
101
-
102
- ### Step 1: Understand the Definitions
103
-
104
- - $ s_k(n) $: sum of digits in base-$k$ representation of $ n $
105
- - $ s_2(n) $
106
-
107
- ... [truncated 204 chars] ...
108
-
109
  $$
110
 
111
- This is the key equation we need to solve.
112
 
113
  ---
114
 
115
- ### Step 2: Understand the Implications
116
 
117
- We are to find all $ n < 1000 $ such that:
118
 
119
  $$
120
- s_2(n)^2 = s_4(n)
121
  $$
122
 
123
- Let’s denote:
124
 
125
- - $ s_2(n) = a $
126
- - $ s_4(n) = a^2 $
127
 
128
- So, we are looking for $ n < 1000 $ such that the **sum of digits in base-2** is $ a $, and the **sum of digits in base-4** is $ a^2 $.
129
 
130
  ---
131
 
132
- ### Step 3: Strategy
133
-
134
- We can iterate over all $ n < 1000 $, compute:
135
 
136
- - $ s_2(n) $: sum of binary digits
137
- - $ s_4(n) $: sum of base-4 digits
138
 
139
- Check if $ s_2(n)^2 = s_4(n) $
 
140
 
141
- If so, then $ n $ is a digiroot.
142
 
143
- ---
144
-
145
- ### Step 4: Implementation (Code or Computation)
146
 
147
- We can write a small program or use a brute-force approach to find all such $ n < 1000 $.
148
-
149
- Let’s do this in code.
150
 
151
- ---
152
 
153
- ### Step 5: Code (Python)
154
 
155
- ```python
156
- def s_k(n, k):
157
- return sum(int(digit) for digit in bin(n)[2:])
158
 
159
- def is_digiroot(n):
160
- s2 = s_k(n, 2)
161
- s4 = s_k(n, 4)
162
- return s2 * s2 == s4
163
 
164
- digiroots = []
165
- for n in range(1, 1000):
166
- if is_digiroot(n):
167
- digiroots.append(n)
168
 
169
- print("Sum of all digiroots less than 1000:", sum(digiroots))
170
- ```
171
 
172
- ---
173
 
174
- ### Step 6: Result
175
 
176
- Running the code gives:
 
177
 
178
- $$
179
- \boxed{1168}
180
- $$
181
 
182
  ---
183
 
184
  ### ✅ Final Answer:
185
 
186
  $$
187
- \boxed{1168}
188
  $$
189
  ```
 
2
 
3
  - **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-momy/math_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-momy/math_model)
4
  - **Owner(s):** group **momy**
5
+ - **Generated at:** 2026-06-03T08:04:32+00:00 (UTC)
6
  - **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
7
 
8
  _This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
 
11
 
12
  | Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
13
  |---|---:|---|
14
+ | Math | 0.3800 | ok |
15
  | Knowledge | — | not run |
16
  | Multilingual | — | not run |
17
  | Safety | — | not run |
 
25
  **Correct** (1 shown)
26
 
27
  - **reference**: `194`
28
+ - **overall** (4/8 completions correct)
29
  - **extracted** (✓): `194`
30
  - **completion**:
31
 
32
  ```text
33
+ We are given a $194 \times 194$ board and asked to find the **least positive integer $k$** such that we can choose $k$ cells to mark, and there is **exactly one tiling** of the board with **$1 \times 2$ and $2 \times 1$ dominoes**, where **every domino contains at most one marked cell**.
34
 
35
  ---
36
 
 
38
 
39
  We are to find the **minimum number of marked cells** such that:
40
 
41
+ - T
42
 
43
  ... [truncated 821 chars] ...
44
 
45
+ **0**, and the tiling is **not unique**.
 
 
46
 
47
+ So, we need to **add** marked cells in such a way that **only one** tiling is possible, and in that tiling, **every domino has at most one marked cell**.
48
 
49
+ This is a **very strict condition**.
50
 
51
  ---
52
 
53
+ ### Step 5: What is the Minimum $k$?
54
 
55
+ We want to **minimize** $k$, the number of marked cells, such that:
56
 
57
+ - There is **exactly one** tiling of the board with dominoes.
58
+ - In that tiling, **every domino has at most one marked cell**.
59
 
60
+ This is equivalent to saying that the **marked cells** must be placed in such a way that **no tiling can be formed** without violating the "at most one marked cell per domino" rule.
61
+
62
+ This is a **very strong constraint**.
63
+
64
+ Let’s consider the **minimum number of marked cells** that would **force** the tiling to be unique.
65
+
66
+ This is a **classic problem** in combinatorics and tiling theory.
67
 
68
  ---
69
 
70
+ ### Step 6: Known Result
71
 
72
+ In a $194 \times 194$ board, the **minimum number of marked cells** required to ensure that **exactly one tiling** exists, with **each domino containing at most one marked cell**, is:
73
 
74
+ $$
75
+ \boxed{194}
76
+ $$
77
 
78
+ This is a known result in tiling theory and combinatorics.
79
 
80
  ---
81
 
82
+ ### Final Answer:
83
 
84
  $$
85
  \boxed{194}
86
  $$
 
 
87
  ```
88
 
89
  **Incorrect** (1 shown)
90
 
91
+ - **reference**: `$g(x)=c, g(x)=\lceil x \rceil, g(x)=\lfloor x \rfloor$`
92
  - **overall** (0/8 completions correct)
93
+ - **extracted** (✗): `h(x) = 0 \text{ or } h(x) = x`
94
  - **completion**:
95
 
96
  ```text
97
+ We are given a functional equation involving a mapping $ h: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Z} $, and the condition:
98
 
99
  $$
100
+ h(x) = h\left( \frac{h(bx - a) + a}{b} \right)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101
  $$
102
 
103
+ for all $ x \in \mathbb{Q} $, $ a \in \mathbb{Z} $, and $ b \in \mathbb{N} $.
104
 
105
  ---
106
 
107
+ ### Step 1: Understand the structure of the equation
108
 
109
+ Let’s denote:
110
 
111
  $$
112
+ y = h(x), \quad z = h(bx - a), \quad \text{and} \quad b = b
113
  $$
114
 
115
+ Then the equation
116
 
117
+ ... [truncated 821 chars] ...
 
118
 
119
+ h(x) = x $ is a solution.
120
 
121
  ---
122
 
123
+ ### Step 9: Check if these are the only solutions
 
 
124
 
125
+ We have two possible forms:
 
126
 
127
+ 1. $ h(x) = 0 $ for all $ x \in \mathbb{Q} $
128
+ 2. $ h(x) = x $ for all $ x \in \mathbb{Q} $
129
 
130
+ Let’s check if there are any other possible solutions.
131
 
132
+ Suppose $ h $ is not identically zero or identity. Then from the earlier equation:
 
 
133
 
134
+ $$
135
+ h(x) = h(h(x))
136
+ $$
137
 
138
+ So $ h $ is idempotent. That is, applying $ h $ twice gives the same result.
139
 
140
+ So $ h $ is idempotent.
141
 
142
+ Also, from the equation:
 
 
143
 
144
+ $$
145
+ h(x) = h\left( \frac{h(bx - a) + a}{b} \right)
146
+ $$
 
147
 
148
+ We can try to define $ h(x) = x $, and it works.
 
 
 
149
 
150
+ We can try $ h(x) = 0 $, and it also works.
 
151
 
152
+ Are there other idempotent functions from $ \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Z} $? That is, functions $ h $ such that $ h(h(x)) = h(x) $ for all $ x \in \mathbb{Q} $.
153
 
154
+ But $ \mathbb{Q} $ is dense in $ \mathbb{R} $, and $ \mathbb{Z} $ is discrete. So the only idempotent functions from $ \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Z} $ are:
155
 
156
+ - $ h(x) = 0 $ for all $ x \in \mathbb{Q} $
157
+ - $ h(x) = x $ for all $ x \in \mathbb{Q} $
158
 
159
+ Because any other function would not be idempotent and would not satisfy the equation.
 
 
160
 
161
  ---
162
 
163
  ### ✅ Final Answer:
164
 
165
  $$
166
+ \boxed{h(x) = 0 \text{ or } h(x) = x}
167
  $$
168
  ```