dyldang commited on
Commit
4c72429
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): af09791

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +7 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ By Dylan Dang
5
 
6
  This project uses a **YOLOv11 object detection model** to identify bike lane infrastructure and related objects in urban street images.
7
 
 
 
8
  The model detects features such as bike lane markings, shared lanes, cyclists, and vehicles using bounding boxes and class labels. It was fine-tuned from a pre-trained model rather than trained from scratch, which allows it to perform reasonably well even with a small dataset.
9
 
10
  The goal of this project was not only to train a model, but to understand how dataset quality and structure affect performance in real-world computer vision tasks.
@@ -51,6 +53,7 @@ This dataset shows **strong class imbalance**, where some classes appear very fr
51
  ### Annotation Process
52
 
53
  The dataset included pre-existing YOLO-format bounding box annotations.
 
54
 
55
  I reviewed a subset of images to validate annotation quality, focusing on:
56
  - alignment of bounding boxes
@@ -92,7 +95,8 @@ Default YOLO augmentations were applied during training:
92
 
93
  The model was trained using the **Ultralytics YOLOv11 framework** in Google Colab.
94
 
95
- Training used transfer learning, starting from a pre-trained model.
 
96
 
97
  **Training Details:**
98
  - Framework: YOLOv11 (Ultralytics)
@@ -117,6 +121,8 @@ This means:
117
  - The model is usually correct when it makes predictions
118
  - But it misses many objects, especially harder or less frequent ones
119
 
 
 
120
  ---
121
 
122
  ### Example Predictions
 
5
 
6
  This project uses a **YOLOv11 object detection model** to identify bike lane infrastructure and related objects in urban street images.
7
 
8
+ YOLOv11 was chosen for its balance of speed and accuracy in real-time object detection tasks.
9
+
10
  The model detects features such as bike lane markings, shared lanes, cyclists, and vehicles using bounding boxes and class labels. It was fine-tuned from a pre-trained model rather than trained from scratch, which allows it to perform reasonably well even with a small dataset.
11
 
12
  The goal of this project was not only to train a model, but to understand how dataset quality and structure affect performance in real-world computer vision tasks.
 
53
  ### Annotation Process
54
 
55
  The dataset included pre-existing YOLO-format bounding box annotations.
56
+ Although the dataset was pre-annotated, I reviewed samples to check for consistency and quality. I observed that some classes (such as "car" and "vehicle") overlap conceptually, which may introduce ambiguity during training. No major corrections were made, but this overlap influenced how results were interpreted.
57
 
58
  I reviewed a subset of images to validate annotation quality, focusing on:
59
  - alignment of bounding boxes
 
95
 
96
  The model was trained using the **Ultralytics YOLOv11 framework** in Google Colab.
97
 
98
+ Training was performed in Google Colab using an RTX 3070. Training took approximately 5-10 minutes.
99
+
100
 
101
  **Training Details:**
102
  - Framework: YOLOv11 (Ultralytics)
 
121
  - The model is usually correct when it makes predictions
122
  - But it misses many objects, especially harder or less frequent ones
123
 
124
+ Performance varied significantly across classes. Common classes such as "Vehicle" achieved higher precision and recall, while underrepresented classes like "Bicycle" and "Car" performed poorly due to limited training samples.
125
+
126
  ---
127
 
128
  ### Example Predictions