 tissues for the health issues we
experience in our lives.
E m o t i o n s :  F e e l i n g  t h e  L a n g u a g e  o f  C e l l s
In higher, more aware life forms, the brain developed a specialization
that enabled the whole community to tune into the status of its regulatory
signals. The evolution of the limbic system provided a unique
mechanism that converted the chemical communication signals into
sensations that could be experienced by all of the cells in the community.
Our conscious mind experiences these signals  as emotions. Theconscious mind not only “reads” the flow of the cellular coordinating
signals that comprise the body’ s “mind” it can also generate emotions,
which are manifested through the controlled release of regulatory signals
by the nervous system.
At the same time that I was studying the mechanics of the cell’ s brain
and gaining insight into the operation of the human brain, Candace Pert
was studying the human brain and becoming aware of the mechanics of
the cell’ s brain. In Molecules of Emotion,  Pert revealed how her study of
information-processing receptors on nerve cell membranes led her to
discover that the same “neural” receptors were present on most, if not all,
of the body’ s cells. Her elegant experiments established that the “mind”
was not focused in the head but was distributed via signal molecules to
the whole body. As importantly, her work emphasized that emotions
were not only derived through a feedback of the body’ s environmental
information. Through self-consciousness, the mind can use the brain to
generate  “molecules of emotion” and override the system. While proper
use of consciousness can bring health to an ailing body, inappropriate
unconscious control of emotions can easily make a healthy body
diseased, a topic I will expand upon in Chapters 6 and 7. Molecules of
Emotion  is a very insightful book describing the scientific discovery
process. It also provides some revealing insights into the struggles
encountered when trying to introduce new “ideas” into science’ s Old
Boys Club, a subject with which I am all too familiar! (Pert 1997)
The limbic system of fered a major evolutionary advance through its
ability to sense and coordinate the flow of behavior -regulating signals
within the cellular community. As the internal signal system evolved, its
greater ef ficiency enabled the brain to increase in size. Multicellular
or ganisms gained increasingly more cells that were dedicated to
responding to an ever -wider variety of external  environmental signals.
While individual cells can respond to simple sensory perceptions such as
red, round, aromatic, and sweet, the extra brainpower available in
multicellular animals enables them to combine those simple sensations
into a higher level of complexity and perceive “apple.”
Fundamental reflex behaviors acquired through evolution are passed
on to of fspring in the form of genetic-based instincts. The evolution of
lar ger brains, with their increased neural cell population, of fered
or ganisms the opportunity not only to rely on instinctual behavior, butalso to learn from their life experiences. The learning of novel reflex
behaviors is essentially a product of conditioning.  For example, consider
the classic example of Pavlov training his dogs to salivate at the ring of a
bell. He first trained them by ringing a bell and coupling that stimulus
with a food reward. After awhile, he would ring the bell but not of fer the
food. By that time, the dogs were so programmed to expect the food that
when the bell rang, they reflexively started to salivate even though no
food was present. This is clearly an “unconscious,” learned reflex
behavior.
Reflex behaviors may be as simple as the spontaneous kick of the leg
when a mallet taps the knee or as complex as driving a car at sixty-five
miles per hour on a crowded interstate highway while your conscious
mind is fully engaged in conversation with a passenger. Though
conditioned behavioral responses may be inordinately complex, they are
“no-brainers.” Through the conditioned learning process, neural
pathways between eliciting stimuli and behavioral responses become
hardwired to ensure a repetitive pattern. Hardwired pathways are
“habits.” In lower animals, the entire brain is designed to engage in
purely habitual responses to stimuli. Pavlov’ s dogs salivate by reflex …
not by deliberate intention. The actions of the subconscious mind are
reflexive in nature and are not governed by reason or thinking.
Physically, this mind is associated with the activities of all  of the brain
structures that are present in animals that have not evolved self-
consciousness.
Humans and a number of other higher mammals have evolved a
specialized region of the brain associated with thinking, planning, and
decision-making called the prefrontal cortex. This portion of the
forebrain is apparently the seat of the “self-conscious” mind processing.
The self-conscious mind is self-reflective; it is a newly evolved “sense
or gan” that observes our own behaviors and emotions. The self-
conscious mind also has access to most of the data stored in our long-
term memory bank. This is an extremely important feature allowing our
history of life to be considered as we consciously plan our futures.
Endowed with the ability to be self-reflective, the self-conscious mind
is extremely powerful. It can observe any programmed behavior we are
engaged in, evaluate the behavior, and consciously decide to change the
program. W e can actively choose  how to respond to most environmentalsignals and whether we even want to respond at all. The conscious
mind’ s capacity to override the subconscious mind’ s preprogrammed
behaviors is the foundation of free will.
However, our special gift comes with a special pitfall. While almost all
or ganisms have to actually experience the stimuli of life first-hand, the
human brain’ s ability to “learn” perceptions is so advanced that we can
actually acquire perceptions indirectly from teachers. Once we accept the
perceptions of others as “truths,” their  perceptions become hardwired
into our own brains, becoming our  “truths.” Here’ s where the problem
arises: what if our teachers’ perceptions are inaccurate? In such cases,
our brains are then downloaded with misperceptions. The subconscious
mind is strictly a stimulus-response playback device; there is no “ghost”
in that part of the “machine” to ponder the long-term consequences of
the programs we engage. The subconscious works only in the “now.”
Consequently, programmed misperceptions in our subconscious mind are
not “monitored” and will habitually engage us in inappropriate and
limiting behaviors.
If I included as a bonus in this chapter a slithering snake that pops out
of this page right now, most of you would run from the room or throw
the book out of the house. Whoever “introduced” you to your first snake
may have behaved in such a shocked way as to give your impressionable
mind an apparently important life les-son: see snake … snake baaad! The
subconscious memory system is very partial to rapidly downloading and
emphasizing perceptions regarding things in your environment that are
threatening to life and limb. If you were taught that snakes are
dangerous, any time a snake comes into your proximity, you reflexively
(unconsciously) engage in a protective response.
But what if a herpetologist were reading this book and a snake popped
out? No doubt herpetologists would not only be intrigued by the snake,
they would be thrilled  with the bonus included in the book. Or at least
they’d be thrilled once they figured out that the book’ s snake was
harmless. They would then hold it and watch its behaviors with delight.
They would think that your  programmed response was an irrational one
because not all snakes are dangerous. Further they would be saddened by
the fact that so many people are deprived of the pleasure of studying
such interesting creatures. Same snake, same stimulus, yet greatly
dif ferent responses.Our responses to environmental stimuli are indeed controlled by
perceptions, but not all of our learned perceptions are accurate. Not all
snakes are dangerous! Y es, perception “controls” biology, but as we’ve
seen, these perceptions can be true or false. Therefore, we would be
more accurate to refer to these controlling perceptions as beliefs.
Beliefs contr ol biology!
Ponder the significance of this information. W e have the capacity to
consciously evaluate our responses to environmental stimuli and change
old responses any time we desire … once we deal with the powerful
subconscious mind, which I discuss in more depth in Chapter 7. W e are
not stuck with our genes or our self-defeating behaviors!
H o w  t h e  M i n d  C o n t r o l s  t h e  B o d y
My insights into how beliefs control biology are grounded in my
studies of cloned endothelial cells, the cells that line the blood vessels.
The endothelial cells I grew in culture monitor their world closely and
change their behavior based on information they pick up from the
environment. When I provided nutrients, the cells would gravitate
toward those nutrients with the cellular equivalent of open arms. When I
created a toxic environment, the cultured cells would retreat from the
stimulus in an ef fort to wall themselves of f from the noxious agents. My
research focused on the membrane perception switches that controlled
the shift from one behavior to the other.
The primary switch I was studying has a protein receptor that responds
to hist


 call "immortal blood," you can live to be 110 years old, in perfect health. A woman in France just
died at age 122.
You can do it yourself, and it is cheap. You will never have a cold again. You will never miss work again. This is the best investment
that you can make in your health. It is taking back your power from the doctors and the pharmaceutical houses that have had it for
generations. And we guarantee it. We have stacks of testimonials, hundreds of astounding spontaneous remissions, and we have
medical records to prove it. It will work. Not maybe. It is the most valua ble information that I have ever seen. It is the best that our
science can of fer today in the hospitals and clinics of America.
Recently, Jane and I were invited to the largest alternative cancer clinic in the western hemisphere. The man in charge of the clinic
told me that 87% of their terminal, not mid-stage, cancer patients, who had been given up for dead, are now healed! They have scar
tissue where once they had lesions; they have clean biopsies. They are up, they are back at work. Those patients used the
technology we are discussing today.
When the tests proved that the technology actually worked, I was called in by the Board of Directors of one of the largest hospitals in
Southern California. They confronted me and told me to deny that this technology works. Why? Because their business was at stake.
Did you know that the "mob" owns about 51% of the pharmaceutical houses in this country? They don't want patients to be able to
cure themselves.
An 80-year old attorney approached me a while back, and he said, "Bob, I was given up for dead. My cancer had metastasized. I was
sent home to write my will, to get my house in order... to die. I sent my son to Radio Shack, where he bought the parts for your
device for $39.00. We put the device together. I walked into the hospital three weeks later, and walked out with clean biopsies. They
were stunned. I am back at my job, working 14 hours a day to make up for the time I was in intensive care. I am jogging two miles a
day."
Another person who approached me at a speaking engagement said, “I was a dying AIDS patient. It took two attendants to lift me
onto the potty. I am now back at work, and I have no symptoms. "One AIDS patient started on our program with a PCR teat, which
measures the number of HIV particles in a cubic centimeter of blood, with a count of 412,473 on June 9, 1995. When he ﬁnished on
November 1, 1995, his count was less than 100 particles. One hundred particles is the smallest amount their instruments can read,
so if the count is less than 100 particles, it is read as zero. So we can say that he had a spontaneous remission. If I only had one of
these, it could be a ﬂuke, an accident. But I have test after test from patients replicating these same results. We also waited a month
after the blood cleaning took place to have the follow-up tests performed. When you see these with your own eyes, and touch them
with your own hands, it is entirely dif ferent from anecdotal data.
We have had Alzheimer's patients regain their memories when their brains were oxygenated using this technology. You can buy an
ozonizer at a tropical ﬁsh store. The FDA has prohibited the sale of ozonizers for human use. Russ Torlage and I are going to
Home About Diseases Healing the Body Healing Foods Healing the Mind Healing the Emotions Energies Science & Spirituality Spirituality Contact10/30/24, 4:43 PM Health-Science-Spirit - Bob Beck Interview
https://health-science-spirit.com/Diseases/Cancer/Bob-Beck-Interview.html 1/5describe to you shortly how to obtain the technology and how it works.
My personal story is that I was "90% dead" when I weighed 290 pounds (I now weigh 145 pounds). My hair had fallen out, and it has
grown back; my libido was shot; my prostate was shot. Using this technology, I have taken 35 years off my chronological age (I am 72
years old), and all you have to do is see a drop of my blood and you will believe it. And there are no side effects. I know I would be
dead now were it not for this program. So, I really do feel that I have been called to do this.
I now weigh half what I used to weigh. When the parasites are all removed from the blood, you lose weight, because the parasites
are using your body. They set your appetite so that everything you eat is stored for them to have a meal.
People with AIDS have never died from AIDS. They have died from opportunistic infections that have killed them because their
immune systems weren't working. There are 23 of these opportunistic infections. This technology kills all 23 of them. The AIDS
patients get well; they go back to work. We have the evidence. Do you know how devastating this information is to the
establishment?
I was given terminal cancer patients by the largest and best-known hospital in California. After 12 of them were healed, some of them
ended up committing suicide because we had taken their crutches away from them. We will say that this technology will not
overcome a person's death wish. That is an issue we have to ﬁnd an answer for and have not yet found, but we will.
LE: W e heard that within the last few days, ﬁve Anthrax cases have surfaced in California and also in Phoenix, Arizona.
Bob: We understand the Iranians were playing with Bubonic Plague and Anthrax. We have word from friends who are in high places
that our technology is the only thing known besides Ampicillin that will have any ef fect on any of these diseases.
LE: Could you talk about immortal blood?
Bob: We coined the phrase "immort al blood," but in the literal sense, it isn't true, of course. It was just a romantic term to describe
reverting the blood appearance back to how it looks when we are in perfect health. When viewed under a dark-ﬁeld microscope, the
blood of a normal, healthy human being usually has a lot of parasitic worms, viruses, fungi, germs and pathogens swimming around.
After three weeks of doing the blood cleaning, the magnetic pulsing and the silver colloids, which I will talk about later, your blood is
not clumped like slinky toys or stacks of poker chips. Who needs more proof than this?
When the immune system is restored, it can even handle cancer. Any oncologist will tell you this. It has been known for many, many
years. You can restore your blood to the immortal state. You can do this yourself at home. We have the clinical proof that it works. It is
cheap, do-it-yourself technology.
LE: I would like our readers to know about how you became involved in these technologies, which enhance the immune system and
kill every organism that isn't supposed to be there.
Bob: I read an article in Science News that was published March 30, 1991. On page 207, it described the "shocking" treatment
proposed for AIDS by Albert Einstein  College of Medicine in New York City, which had accidentally discovered a way to cure all AIDS.
So I looked into this, and I found that a paper on an AIDS cure had been presented to a Joint Congress on Combination Therapies in
Washington, D.C., on March 14, 1991, at the First International Symposium on Combination Therapy.
When I attempted to ﬁnd a copy of this paper to see what it said, I found that they had all vanished or were cut out of the
proceedings. We hired a private investigator who got a personal abstract copy from one of the conference attendees. I also did a
computer search and found that the only other mention of this technology was in "Outer Limits" in Longevity Magazine which
appeared in the December, 1992, issue. It stated that Steven Kaali, M.D., from Albert Einstein College of Medicine, had found a way
of inhibiting AIDS in blood, but that years of testing would be required before the virus-electrocuting device was ready for use. In
other words, they discovered it and then tried to cover it up immediately.
But a very funny thing happened. Two years later, a patent popped up. The U.S. Government Patent Ofﬁce described the entire
process. You can obtain Patent #5188738 in which the same Dr. Kaali describes a process, which will attenuate any bacteria or virus
(including AIDS/HIV), parasites and all fungi contained in the blood, rendering them ineffective from infecting a normally healthy
human cell. This is in a government document! This was in 1990! Why haven't they told the public about it? I decided if there was a
sure-ﬁre cure for AIDS, I had to ﬁnd out about it.
When I looked into Dr. Kaali's work, I decided to go ahead and fund it. We found that it worked all of the time. For two and a half
years, we gave full credit for this invention to Dr. Kaali, whose name is on the patent. Then I discovered that there was a long history
of this technology. We followed a trail of these patents


(	0.)			 5!%	."%	5%	,5.5-
*,	-
;" 0	!4
	"*   %%"!"	%"
*	*	%!! "

*"		"
%*"! 0

3		 6	,36-	"!"%			"	%A"3M	!	 *%%"	98
0!""
	**					**
7"		"	00
	"0	!4	"
	"  %*,	-	*	7 53"%( *( "%"

	"!"%!
	0		"
	!		;	  ;%	"
#	*

0	!4)
@*	%2%"
*
0?0	!4	"!
!C

"

!

	# 	%	%"0"
			%

 %	**

J+
	"*"%"#
! *	%  !	&

%%	"*
%%*	*5.5"
 ",4	#	*
 %!%6	)	M5+	"!"4"#	B"	5.5	JT?D:3N**ND;NDH-7	)7$

		5

"

	"
	#"
*	*!

"&A)#5%	 	"	%%""	=  A)#5%	0*	%>6015.5			!*	%	 M=5	!* N*
*	%*0"FI*"%	H;%""  %!	%
1%! !	:;& ;*>#"
	"
""%	H;%"!*0!	"!