	the

possibility	that	small	amounts	of	weakened	polio	virus	which	will	not	infect

monkey	tissues,	may	still	be	able	to	multiply	in	human	tissues...Monkey	tissues

are	not	necessarily	comparable	to	human	tissues	in	this	respect.	This	is

exemplified	by	the	fact	that	the	amount	of	inactivated	virus	necessary	to	produce

a	good	polio	response	in	humans	is	far	less	than	that	needed	in	monkeys,	and	far

less	in	monkeys	than	in	mice."

These	two	doctors	are	still	floundering	around	in	the	delusion	of	"virus

causation"	but	they	are	discovering	the	fallacies	and	in	time	will	probably

emerge	into	the	light.	When	they	inject	some	of	the	putrefied	protein	which	they

call	virus	vaccine,	into	people	it	takes	less	of	it	to	produce	toxic	poisoning	and

paralysis	than	it	does	in	animals.	This	is	not	because	man’s	reaction	to	germs	or

viruses	is	any	different	from	that	of	animals;	it	is	because	man	is	already	on	the

borderline	of	toxemia	because	of	the	incompatible	foods	and	poisons	he	uses,

while	the	animals	that	live	out	in	nature	and	eat	unprocessed	foods	are	strong

and	more	resistant	to	poisons.

Dr.	Alfred	Byrne,	in	a	scathing	criticism	of	the	Salk	vaccine,	in	the	Spectator	for

July	22,	1955,	stated:

"It	is	known	that	the	monkey	test	for	the	virus	is	so	crude	as	to	constitute	a

source	of	danger	as	it	will	not	always,	by	any	means,	differentiate	between	the

presence	of	no	live	virus	and	live	virus	present	in	small	amounts."	He	recognized

the	potential	hazards	to	be	so	apparent	that	he	considered	it	remarkable	that	there

were	not	considerably	more	deaths	and	paralysis	from	the	Salk	vaccine.	He

wrote:	"The	deaths	might	have	been	multiplied	ten	or	a	hundredfold."

If	the	complete	records	were	made	public	we	would	all	be	surprised	to	find	that

there	are	so	many	more	Salk	casualties	than	have	been	reported.

WHAT	DOES	THE	"SALK"	IMMUNITY	MEAN?

The	U.S.	News	and	World	Report	(May	13,	1955)	in	an	article	on	"Better	Polio

Vaccine	in	Sight"	states:	"The	Salk	vaccine,	admittedly,	offers	only	limited

protection,	though	its	developer	believes	it	can	be	improved	over	the	60	to	90%

effectiveness	shown	by	the	trials	last	summer."

There	is	a	wide	margin	between	60	and	90%.	Would	any	employer	hire	a	worker

who	made	mistakes	40%	of	the	time	and	never	improved	over	90%?	Would

anyone	run	his	business	with	such	haphazard	results?	Yet	the	parents	are	urged

to	trust	the	lives	of	their	children	in	the	hands	of	"Salk	serum	shooters"	whose

most	optimistic	promise	is	for	only	60	to	90%	protection.	This	is	no	protection	at

all.	The	protection	among	the	unvaccinated	is	far	higher	than	that.	This	means

that	out	of	every	100	who	are	vaccinated	with	the	Salk	vaccine,	10	can	be

expected	to	get	polio.	For	the	general	unvaccinated	population	only	one	person

in	4,000	(in	U.S.)	is	likely	to	get	polio	and	only	one	in	11,000	in	England.

ARE	DR.	SALK’S	FIGURES	ON	EFFECTIVENESS	ACCURATE?

How	were	the	percentages	of	effectiveness	arrived	at?

An	article	in	LIFE	magazine	(April	25,)	stated:

"Although	the	test	had	beer	carried	out	in	44	states,	the	most	dependable	results

came	from	11	in	which	200,745	children	received	three	vaccine	shots	and

201,229	got	dummy	shots	to	serve	as	a	yardstick	for	the	vaccine’s	effectiveness.

Ten	vaccinated	and	68	unvaccinated	children	caught	laboratory	confirmed	cases

of	polio.	This	indicated	(to	them)	that	the	vaccine	was	more	than	80%	effective."
It	is	apparent	that	this	is	not	in	any	sense	a	true	measurement	of	the	effective

ness	of	the	vaccine.	In	the	first	place,	if	44	states	were	tested	why	were	the

figures	used	in	only	11	of	them.	The	statement	that	they	were	more	dependable

no	doubt,	means	that	they	were	the	only	ones	that	were	not	too	extremely

condemnatory.	If	only	the	most	favorable	figures	are	used	in	a	test	the	estimate	is

not	accurate.	In	the	second	place,	the	dummy	shots	of	colored	water	are	not	a

fair	"yardstick"	because	injection	of	anything	at	all	even	distilled	water	is

harmful	and	often	fatal.	What	was	the	coloring	matter	that	was	added	to	the

dummy	shots?	Was	it	carbolic	acid	or	mercurochome	or	was	it	food	coloring

which	is	a	coal	tar	derivative	and	condemned	as	a	poison	by	the	Food	and	Drug

Administration?

There	was	a	high	percentage	of	polio	among	the	children	vaccinated	with	the

colored	water.	Six	times	more	polio	was	caused	by	these	dummy	shots	than	by

the	vaccine.	This	certainly	cannot	be	accepted	by	any	sane	person	as	a	fair	test	of

the	effectiveness	of	any	vaccine.	The	colored	water	plus	the	Salk	vaccine

produced	far	more	polio	and	death	per	population	than	we	have	among	the

unvaccinated	masses.	All	this	showed	up	in	spite	of	their	own	"hand	picked"

records	in	which	only	the	favorable	reports	were	publicized.	The	Francis	Report

(statistics	of	the	Salk	experiment)	upon	which	the	effectiveness	was	based

showed	that	the	Salk	vaccine	seemed	to	protect	against	the	paralytic	form	of

polio	in	only	30%	of	the	cases—on	the	average.	According	to	that,	70%	of	those

vaccinated	could	be	subject	to	the	worst	paralytic	form	of	polio.	On	the	other

hand	only	one	person	in	4,571	(in	U.S.)	gets	polio	without	the	vaccine.

It	was	never	proved	that	the	vaccine	gave	even	the	30%	protection.	That	was

merely	assumed	from	the	faulty	experiments	and	the	"manipulated"	figures.	For

instance	(Salk	Story	by	Bayly	p14),	"No	case	was	considered	as	immunized

unless	it	had	received	two	shots	of	the	vaccine.	This	means	that	a	child

developing	poliomyelitis	after	the	first	inoculation	and	before	the	second	one

would	automatically	be	placed	in	the	uninoculated	class,"	and	would	not	be

counted	as	a	Salk	vaccine	casualty	even	though	he	died	of	the	"shot".	This

probably	accounts	for	the	comparatively	few	deaths	that	were	reported	as	a	result

of	the	experiment.	This	would	also	invalidate	all	the	conclusions	drawn	from	the

figures.

Dr.	Salk	is	reported	to	have	said	that	"children	vaccinated	last	year	should	be

given	booster	inoculations	this	year."	If	the	full	course	of	shots	failed	last	year
	how	can	they	expect	some	more	of	the	same	failure	mechanism	to	do	any	better

this	year?

OTHER	CAUSES	OF	POLIO

Although	vaccination	is	one	of	the	quickest	and	surest	ways	of	getting	polio

because	poisons	are	injected	d


 we
hate, because we don’ t “deserve” a better life.
Conventional methods for suppressing destructive behaviors include
drugs and talk therapy. Newer approaches promise to change our
programming, recognizing that there is no use “reasoning” with the
subconscious tape player. These methods capitalize on the findings of
quantum physics that connect ener gy and thought. In fact, these
modalities that reprogram previously learned behaviors can be
collectively referred to as ener gy psychology, a bur geoning field based
on the New Biology.
But how much easier would it be to be nurtured from the beginning of
life so that you can reach your genetic and creative potential? How much
better to become a conscious parent so that your children and their
children will be conscious parents, making reprogramming unnecessary
and making for a happier, more peaceful planet!
A  T w i n k l e  i n  Y o u r  P a r e n t s ’  E y e s :
C o n s c i o u s  C o n c e p t i o n  &  C o n s c i o u s  P r e g n a n c y
Y ou all know the expression, “When you were only a twinkle in your
parents’ eyes.” A phrase that conjures up the happiness of loving parents
who truly want to conceive a child. It turns out it is also a phrase that
sums up the latest genetic research suggesting that parents should
cultivate that twinkle in the months before they conceive a child. That
growth-promoting awareness and intention can produce a smarter,
healthier, and happier baby.
Research reveals that parents act as genetic engineers for their children
in the months before conception. In the final stages of egg and sperm
maturation, a process called genomic imprinting  adjusts the activity of
specific groups of genes that will shape the character of the child yet to
be conceived. (Surani 2001; Reik and W alter 2001) Research suggests
that what is going on in the lives of the parents during the process of
genomic imprinting has a profound influence on the mind and body of
their child, a scary thought given how unprepared most people are to
have a baby. V erny writes in Pr e-Par enting: Nurturing Y our Child fr om
Conception:  “It makes a dif ference whether we are conceived in love,haste, or hate and whether a mother wants to be pregnant … parents do
better when they live in a calm and stable environment free of addictions
and supported by family and friends.” (V erny and W eintraub 2002)
Interestingly, aboriginal cultures have recognized the influence of the
conception environment for millennia. Prior to conceiving a child,
couples ceremonially purify their minds and bodies.
Once the child is conceived, an impressive body of research is
documenting how important parents’ attitudes are in the development of
the fetus. Again V erny writes: “In fact, the great weight of the scientific
evidence that has emer ged over the last decade demands that we
reevaluate the mental and emotional abilities of unborn children. A wake
or asleep, the studies show, they (unborn children) are constantly tuned
in to their mother ’ s every action, thought, and feeling. From the moment
of conception, the experience in the womb shapes the brain and lays the
groundwork for personality, emotional temperament, and the power of
higher thought.”
Now is the time to stress that the New Biology is not  a return to the
old days of blaming mothers for every ailment that medicine didn’ t
understand—from schizophrenia to autism. Mothers and fathers are in
the conception and pregnancy business together, even though it is the
mother who carries the child in her womb. What the father does
profoundly af fects the mother, which in turn af fects the developing child.
For example, if the father leaves and the mother starts questioning her
own ability to survive, his leaving profoundly changes the interaction
between the mother and the unborn baby. Similarly, societal factors, such
as lack of employment, housing, and healthcare or endless wars that pull
fathers into the military, can af fect the parents and thus the developing
child.
The essence of conscious parenting is that both mothers and fathers
have important responsibilities for fostering healthy, intelligent,
productive, and joy-filled children. W e surely cannot blame ourselves
nor our parents for failures in our own or our children’ s lives. Science
has kept our attention focused on the notion of genetic determinism,
leaving us ignorant about the influence beliefs have on our lives and
more importantly, how our behaviors and attitudes program the lives of
our children.Most obstetricians are also still uneducated about the importance of
parental attitudes in the development of the baby. According to the
notion of genetic determinism that they were steeped in as medical
students, fetal development is mechanically controlled by genes with
little additional contribution from the mother. Consequently, ob-gyns are
only concerned with a few maternal prenatal issues: Is she eating well?
T aking vitamins? Does she exercise regularly? Those questions focus on
what they believe is the mother ’ s principal role, the provision of
nutrients to be used by the genetically programmed fetus.
But the developing child receives far more than nutrients from the
mother ’ s blood. Along with nutrients, the fetus absorbs excess glucose if
the mother is diabetic and excess cortisol and other fight or flight
hormones if the mother is chronically stressed. Research now of fers
insights into how the system works. If a mother is under stress, she
activates her HP A axis, which provides fight or flight responses in a
threatening environment.
Stress hormones prepare the body to engage in a protection response.
Once these maternal signals enter the fetal blood stream, they af fect the
same tar get tissues and or gans in the fetus as they did in the mother. In
stressful environments, fetal blood preferentially flows to the muscles
and hindbrain, providing nutritional requirements needed by the arms
and legs and by the region of the brain responsible for life-saving reflex
behavior. In supporting the function of the protection-related systems,
blood flow is shunted from the viscera or gans and stress hormones
suppress forebrain function. The development of fetal tissue and or gans
is proportional to both the amount of blood they receive and the function
they provide. When passing through the placenta, the hormones of a
mother experiencing chronic stress will profoundly alter the distribution
of blood flow in her fetus and change the character of her developing
child’ s physiology. (Lesage, et al, 2004; Christensen 2000; Arnsten 1998;
Leutwyler 1998; Sapolsky 1997; Sandman, et al, 1994)
At the University of Melbourne, E. Marilyn W intour ’ s research on
pregnant sheep, who are physiologically quite similar to humans, has
found that prenatal exposure to cortisol eventually leads to high blood
pressure (Dodic, et al, 2002). Fetal cortisol levels play a very important
regulatory role in the development of the kidney’ s filtering units, the
nephrons. A nephron’ s cells are intimately involved with regulating thebody’ s salt balance and consequently are important in controlling blood
pressure. Excess cortisol absorbed from a stressed mother modifies fetal
nephron formation. An additional ef fect of excess cortisol is that it
simultaneously switches the mother ’ s and the fetus’ s system from a
growth state to a protection posture. As a result, the growth-inhibiting
ef fect of excess cortisol in the womb causes the babies to be born
smaller.
Suboptimal conditions in the womb that lead to low birth-weight
babies have been linked to a number of adult ailments that Nathanielsz
outlines in his book Life In The W omb,  (Nathanielsz 1999) including
diabetes, heart disease and obesity. For example, Dr. David Barker (ibid.)
of England’ s University of Southampton has found that a male who
weighs fewer than 5.5 pounds at birth has a 50 percent greater chance of
dying of heart disease than one with a higher birth weight. Harvard
researchers have found that women who weigh fewer than 5.5 pounds at
birth have a 23 percent higher risk of cardiovascular disease than women
born heavier. And David Leon (ibid.) of the London School of Hygiene
and T ropical Medicine has found that diabetes is three times more
common in 60-year -old men who were small and thin at birth.
The new focus on the influences of the prenatal environment extends
to the study of IQ, which genetic determinists and racists once linked
simply to genes. But in 1997, Bernie Devlin, a professor of psychiatry at
the University of Pittsbur gh School of Medicine, carefully analyzed 212
earlier studies that compared the IQs of twins, siblings, and parents and
their children. He concluded that genes account for only forty-eight
percent of the factors that determine IQ. And when the syner gistic ef fects
of mingling the mother and father ’ s genes are factored in, the true
inherited component of intelligence plummets even further, to thirty-four
percent. (Devlin, et al, 1997; McGue 1997)
Devlin, on the other hand, found that conditions during prenatal
development significantly


 highly evolved spiritu al society right here. The Internet has greatly helped by making it so easy to establish worldwide
links.
I see the next step in the formation of communal groups of spiritually realized individuals, working towards a common goal. There can
be a wide variety of spiritual groups, from meditation and healing groups, to those living together as spiritual families or tribes on
large tracts of land. This is not mean t as withdrawing from society but rather as establishing ‘spiritual universities’, to experiment with
and teach ‘holistic living’, to develop a model of a new cooperative society.
Traditionally, similar ventures were either on a small scale, or commercially oriented, or the individuals were not sufﬁciently evolved,
or there was a spiritual leader with a group of followers. The obvious signs of a spiritual group or society are harmony, cooperation,
and a minimum of rules. The main quality to look for in someone who wants to join a group living communally is the ability to live in
harmony with all the others.
Forming interconnected spiritual communities would bring several advantages, in addition to the obvious ones for the participants.
These communities would serve as examples or showcases for the rest of society, and they could become focal points of healing
activity, spiritual teaching and social innovation. Eventually a new world order may evolve based on cooperation and spiritual values.
Last not least is the survival value in the event of worldwide calamities that greatly damage or destroy our present civilization; a new
cooperative civilization can then re-grow from strong spiritual roots.
Home About Diseases Healing the Body Healing Foods Healing the Mind Healing the Emotions Energies Science & Spirituality Spirituality Contact10/30/24, 3:04 PM Health-Science-Spirit - A Spiritual Path for the New Millennium
https://health-science-spirit.com/Spirituality/A-Spiritual-Path-For-The-New-Millennium.html 1/2Disclaimer: The aim of this web site is to provide information on using natural healing methods to aid in the treatment of illness and health improvement.
The author cannot accept any legal responsibility for any problem arising from experimenting with these methods. For any serious disease,
or if you are unsure about a particular course of action, seek the help of a competent health professional.
© Copyright W alter Last & Austpac Productions. All Rights Reserved. | W eb Design by Austpac.10/30/24, 3:04 PM Health-Science-Spirit - A Spiritual Path for the New Millennium
https://health-science-spirit.com/Spirituality/A-Spiritual-Path-For-The-New-Millennium.html 2/2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|>

 !

"#$%%&%%%'(')*

		"+
,
 -.*

/*0

.
,12
 34/5!6/
26

!

!

!
!

"

#

$

!
!
!

%

&

!
!
!!

!

&

'(


!

!

	"

-./-.0&'

!*

*3

	&
	'

%-%,
01

.21(+34
'
"

4+

!

?

E>.%

!"!'
"
'!

1(+.$

*
		#$		F

$
*

&+

;95G'

*

		$@
	H$

?

	$
	*

2
E>.%

4

B$

$

	$

$)H

$

	$

#
" #

	$

$

	&

'<