Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,104 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
pretty_name: Coefficients on Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials for permutations of size 7
|
| 4 |
+
---
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
# The Coefficients of Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials for Permutations of Size 7
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
Kazhdan-Lusztig (KL) polynomials are polynomials in a variable \\(q\\) and
|
| 9 |
+
with integer coefficients that (for our purposes) are indexed by a pair of permutations [1].
|
| 10 |
+
We will write the KL polynomial associated with permutations \\(\sigma\\) and \\(\nu\\) as
|
| 11 |
+
\\(P_{\sigma,\nu}(q)\\). For example, the KL polynomial associated with permutations
|
| 12 |
+
\\(\sigma = 1 \; 4 \; 3 \; 2 \; 7 \; 6 \; 5 \; 10 \; 9 \; 8 \; 11\\) and
|
| 13 |
+
\\(\nu = 4 \; 6 \; 7 \; 8 \; 9 \; 10 \; 1 \; 11 \; 2 \; 3 \; 5\\) is
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
\\(P_{\sigma,\nu}(q) = 1 + 16q + 103q^2 + 337q^3 + 566q^4 + 529q^5 + 275q^6 + 66q^7 + 3q^8\\)
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
(see [here](https://gswarrin.w3.uvm.edu/research/klc/klc.html) for efficient software to compute
|
| 19 |
+
these polynomials). KL polynomials have deep connections throughout several areas of mathematics. For example,
|
| 20 |
+
KL polynomials are related to the dimensions of intersection homology in Schubert calculus,
|
| 21 |
+
the study of the Hecke algebra, and representation theory of the symmetric group. They
|
| 22 |
+
can be computed via a recursive formula [[1]](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01390031),
|
| 23 |
+
nevertheless, in many ways they remain mysterious. For instance, there is no known closed
|
| 24 |
+
formula for the degree of \\(P_{\sigma,\nu}(q)\\).
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
One family of questions revolve around the coefficients of \\(P_{\sigma,\nu}(q)\\).
|
| 27 |
+
For instance, it has been hypothesized that the coefficient on the largest possible monomial term
|
| 28 |
+
\\(q^{\ell(\sigma) - \ell(\nu)-1/2}\\) (where \\(\ell(x)\\) is a statistic of the
|
| 29 |
+
permutation \\(x\\) called the *length* of the permutation), which is known as the
|
| 30 |
+
\\(\mu\\)-coefficient, has a combinatorial interpretation but currently this is not
|
| 31 |
+
known. Better understanding this and other coefficients is of significant
|
| 32 |
+
interest to mathematicians from a range of fields.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## Dataset details
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Each instance in this dataset consists of a pair of permutations of \\(n,x \in S_n\\)
|
| 37 |
+
along with the coefficients of the polynomial \\(P_{x,w}(q)\\). If \\(x = \;1 \;2 \;3\; 4\; 5\; 6\\),
|
| 38 |
+
\\(w=4 \;5\; 6\; 1 \;2 \;3\\) and \\(P_{v,w}(q) = 1 + 4q + 4q^2 + q^3\\)
|
| 39 |
+
then the coefficients field is written as `1, 4, 4, 1`. Note that coefficients are listed
|
| 40 |
+
by increasing degree of the power of \\(q\\) (e.g., the coefficient on \\(1\\) comes first,
|
| 41 |
+
then the coefficient on \\(q\\), then the coefficient on \\(q^2\\), etc.)
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
We summarize the limited number of values coefficients on \\(P_{x,w}(q)\\) take when \\(x, w \in S_7\\).
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
**Constant Terms:**
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
| | 0 | 1 | Total number of instances |
|
| 48 |
+
|----------|----------|----------|----------|
|
| 49 |
+
| Train | 17,479,910 | 2,841,370 | 20,321,280 |
|
| 50 |
+
| Test | 4,370,771 | 709,549 | 5,080,320 |
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
**Coefficients on \\(q\\):**
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total number of instances |
|
| 55 |
+
|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
|
| 56 |
+
| Train | 19,291,150 | 660,600 | 266,591 | 80,173 | 18,834 | 3,221 | 711 | 20,321,280 |
|
| 57 |
+
| Test | 4,822,214 | 165,768 | 66,593 | 19,963 | 4,762 | 819 | 201 | 5,080,320 |
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
**Coefficient on \\(q^2\\):**
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Total number of instances |
|
| 62 |
+
|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
|
| 63 |
+
| Train | 20,072,738 | 170,412 | 46,226 | 16,227 | 7,621 | 4,023 | 1,287 | 1,153 | 785 | 350 | 152 | 139 | 121 | 42 | 4 | 20,321,280 |
|
| 64 |
+
| Test | 5,017,962 | 42,748 | 11,568 | 4,021 | 1,905 | 1,065 | 349 | 287 | 183 | 86 | 40 | 37 | 47 | 22 | 5,080,320 |
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
**Coefficient on \\(q^3\\):**
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 15 | Total number of instances |
|
| 69 |
+
|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
|
| 70 |
+
| Train | 20,291,535 | 22,094 | 4,779 | 1,660 | 590 | 195 | 206 | 115 | 34 | 26 | 24 | 18 | 4 | 20,321,280 |
|
| 71 |
+
| Test | 507,2831 | 5,498 | 1,213 | 442 | 146 | 61 | 50 | 37 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 5,080,320 |
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
**Coefficient on \\(q^4\\):**
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
| | 0 | 1 | Total number of instances |
|
| 76 |
+
|----------|----------|----------|----------|
|
| 77 |
+
| Train | 17,479,910 | 2,841,370 | 20,321,280 |
|
| 78 |
+
| Test | 4,370,771 | 709,549 | 5,080,320 |
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
## Data Generation
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
Datasets were generated using C code from Greg Warrington's
|
| 84 |
+
[website](https://gswarrin.w3.uvm.edu/research/klc/klc.html). The code we used can be found
|
| 85 |
+
[here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/kl-polynomial_coefficients).
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
## Task
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
**Math question:** Generate conjectures around the properties of coefficients appearing on KL polynomials.
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
**Narrow ML task:** Predict the coefficients of \\(P_{x,w}(q)\\) given \\(x\\) and \\(w\\).
|
| 92 |
+
We break this up into a separate task for each coefficient though one could
|
| 93 |
+
choose to predict all simultaneously. Since there are generally very few
|
| 94 |
+
different integers that arise as coefficients (at least in these small examples),
|
| 95 |
+
we frame this problem as one of classification.
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
While the classification task as framed does not capture the broader math question exactly,
|
| 98 |
+
illuminating connections between \\(x\\), \\(w\\), and the coefficients of \\(P_{x,w}(q)\\)
|
| 99 |
+
has the potential to yield critical insights.
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
## References
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
\[1\] Kazhdan, David, and George Lusztig. "Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras." Inventiones mathematicae 53.2 (1979): 165-184.
|
| 104 |
+
[2] Warrington, Gregory S. "Equivalence classes for the μ-coefficient of Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials in Sn." Experimental Mathematics 20.4 (2011): 457-466.
|