Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,110 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
pretty_name: Mutation equivalence of quivers
|
| 4 |
+
---
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
# Mutation Equivalence of Quivers
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
Quivers and quiver mutations are central to the combinatorial study of cluster algebras,
|
| 9 |
+
algebraic structures with connections to Poisson Geometry, string theory, and Teichmuller
|
| 10 |
+
theory. Quivers are directed (multi)graphs, and a quiver mutation is a local transformation
|
| 11 |
+
centered at a chosen node of the graph that involves adding, deleting, and reversing the
|
| 12 |
+
orientation of specific edges based on a set of combinatorial rules. A fundamental open
|
| 13 |
+
problem in this area is finding an algorithm that determines whether two quivers are mutation
|
| 14 |
+
equivalent (one can traverse from one quiver to another by applying mutations). Currently,
|
| 15 |
+
such algorithms only exist for special cases (including types \\(A\\) [1], \\(D\\) [2],
|
| 16 |
+
and \\(\tilde{D}\\) [3]). To our knowledge, the remaining classes in this dataset
|
| 17 |
+
(\\(E\\), \\(DE\\), \\(BE\\), and \\(B$\\) lack characterizations. Recent work has explored
|
| 18 |
+
whether deep learning models can learn to correctly predict if two quivers are mutation equivalent
|
| 19 |
+
[4]. [5] utilized a subset of this dataset to re-discover known characterization theorems.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## Dataset
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
The task associated with this dataset involves identifying whether two quivers are mutation equivalent.
|
| 24 |
+
Thus, the inputs are quivers (directed multigraphs). We chose to use examples with \\(11\\) nodes
|
| 25 |
+
(though one could reasonably have chosen another number). They are encoded by their
|
| 26 |
+
\\(11 \times 11\\) adjacency matrices and the labels are one of \\(7\\) different equivalence classes:
|
| 27 |
+
\\(A_{11},BB_{11},BD_{11},BE_{11},D_{11},DE_{11},E_{11}\\). For the quiver mutation classes that
|
| 28 |
+
are not mutation finite (that is, the mutation equivalence class has an infinite number of elements),
|
| 29 |
+
the datasets contain quivers generated up to a certain depth, which is the distance from the original quiver,
|
| 30 |
+
measured by number of mutations. The depths for those classes which are infinite are listed below
|
| 31 |
+
and were chosen to balance the sizes of different classes.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
| Mutation equivalance class | Sampling depth |
|
| 34 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 35 |
+
| \\(B_{11}\\) | 10 |
|
| 36 |
+
| \\(BD_{11}\\) | 9 |
|
| 37 |
+
| \\(BE_{11}\\) | 8 |
|
| 38 |
+
| \\(DE_{11}\\) | 9 |
|
| 39 |
+
| \\(E_{11}\\) | 9 |
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
Dataset statistics are as follows:
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
| | \\(A_{11}\\) | \\(B_{11}\\) | \\(BD_{11}\\) | \\(BE_{11}\\) | \\(D_{11}\\) | \\(DE_{11}\\) | \\(E_{11}\\) | Total |
|
| 44 |
+
|---|---|--|---|---|---|----|----|---|
|
| 45 |
+
| Training | 11,940 | 27,410 | 23,651 | 22,615 | 25,653 | 23,528 | 28,998 | 163,795 |
|
| 46 |
+
| Test | 2,984 | 6,852 | 5,912 | 5,653 | 6,413 | 5,881 | 7,249 | 40,944 |
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Data generation
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
All mutation classes were generated using Sage [6], and the script can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/quiver_mutation_equivalence).
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
## Task
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
**Math question:** Find simple rules to determine whether or not a quiver belongs to a
|
| 56 |
+
specific mutation equivalence class (out of classes \\(A_{11},BB_{11},BD_{11},BE_{11},
|
| 57 |
+
D_{11},DE_{11},E_{11}\\)). Note that rules for \\(A_{11}\\) and \\(D_{11}\\) are known.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
**ML task:** Train a model that can predict a quiver's mutation equivalence class out of the 7 options above.
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
See the work [\[2\]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07467) for an example of how a model
|
| 62 |
+
trained on a variant of this dataset was used to re-discover known theorems.
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
## Small model performance
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
| | Accuracy |
|
| 67 |
+
|----------|----------|
|
| 68 |
+
| Logistic regression | \\(40.3\%\\) |
|
| 69 |
+
| MLP | \\(86.5\% \pm 1.9\%\\) |
|
| 70 |
+
| Transformer | \\(92.9\% \pm 0.5\%\\) |
|
| 71 |
+
| Guessing largest class | \\(17.7\%\\) |
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training.
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
- **Curated by:** Helen Jenne
|
| 76 |
+
- **Funded by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
|
| 77 |
+
- **Language(s) (NLP):** NA
|
| 78 |
+
- **License:** CC-by-2.0
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
### Dataset Sources
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
The dataset was generated using [SageMath](https://www.sagemath.org/). Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/mheight_function).
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
- **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/mheight_function)
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
## Citation
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
**BibTeX:**
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
@article{chau2025machine,
|
| 91 |
+
title={Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics},
|
| 92 |
+
author={Chau, Herman and Jenne, Helen and Brown, Davis and He, Jesse and Raugas, Mark and Billey, Sara and Kvinge, Henry},
|
| 93 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366},
|
| 94 |
+
year={2025}
|
| 95 |
+
}
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
**APA:**
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
Chau, H., Jenne, H., Brown, D., He, J., Raugas, M., Billey, S., & Kvinge, H. (2025). Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366.
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
Henry Kvinge, acdbenchdataset@gmail.com
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
\[1\] Buan, Aslak Bakke, and Dagfinn F. Vatne. "Derived equivalence classification for cluster-tilted algebras of type $A_n$." Journal of Algebra 319.7 (2008): 2723-2738.
|
| 106 |
+
\[2\] Vatne, Dagfinn F. "The mutation class of $D_n$ quivers." Communications in Algebra 38.3 (2010): 1137-1146.
|
| 107 |
+
\[3\] Henrich, Thilo. "Mutation classes of diagrams via infinite graphs." Mathematische Nachrichten 284.17‐18 (2011): 2184-2205.
|
| 108 |
+
\[4\] Bao, Jiakang, et al. "Machine learning algebraic geometry for physics." arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.10334 (2022).
|
| 109 |
+
\[5\] He, Jesse, et al. "Machines and Mathematical Mutations: Using GNNs to Characterize Quiver Mutation Classes." arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07467 (2024).
|
| 110 |
+
\[6\] Stein, William. "Sage: Open source mathematical software." (2008).
|