File size: 5,505 Bytes
5c885c4
 
091c5be
5c885c4
 
091c5be
5c885c4
128b7ca
5c885c4
128b7ca
 
5c885c4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
128b7ca
 
5c885c4
 
 
 
 
37937e2
128b7ca
 
5c885c4
f31993d
5c885c4
 
aa465d9
 
 
 
5c885c4
128b7ca
 
15c21b7
5c885c4
9462c1e
5c885c4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9462c1e
5c885c4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9462c1e
5c885c4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
f3533c7
5c885c4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
---
license: cc-by-2.0
pretty_name: Characterizing weaving patterns of size 7 x 6
---

# Dataset Card for Weaving Patterns of Size \\(7 \times 6\\)

*Weaving patterns* are \\((n \times n−1)\\)-matrices with \\(\{1, 2, \dots , n\}\\)-
entries introduced by \[1\] to study the number of reduced decompositions of the 
permutation that swaps \\(n\\) and \\(1\\), \\(n\\) - \\(1\\) and \\(2\\), etc. up to commutation equivalence. The number
of such objects counts a wide range of combinatorial phenomena, including the number of parallel sorting
networks, the number of rhombic tilings of regular polygons, and is connected to 
the study of the higher Bruhat orders \[2\]. An \\(O(n^2)\\) algorithm for determining
if a given \\(\{1, 2, . . . , n\}\\)-matrix is a valid weaving pattern
exists but gives no additional insight into the structure of
weaving patterns and correspondingly the asymptotics of
reduced decompositions. The enumeration of reduced decompositions 
up to commutation equivalence has been studied by many including
Knuth and Stanley. An exact formula is likely out of reach,
so asymptotic upper and lower bounds are of great interest.
ML models that can detect necessary or sufficient conditions
for a matrix to be a valid weaving pattern have the potential
to lead to substantial improvements in the upper bound.

This dataset is a mixture of enriched weaving patterns and
non-weaving pattern matrices with \\(\{1, 2, \dots, 7\}\\)-entries.

## Dataset Details

Each matrix is stored on a single line in row-major format. For instance,

`[ 3, 5, 4, 2, 6, 7, 7, 5, 6, 1, 4, 3, 6, 4, 1, 5, 7, 2, 6, 3, 1, 5, 7, 2, 2, 3, 1, 4, 7, 6, 2, 3, 4, 1, 7, 5, 2, 3, 4, 1, 6, 5 ]`.

Labels are `0` (not a weaving pattern) and `1` (a weaving pattern).

Data loaders can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master).

**Statistics**
|  | Weaving patterns | Non-weaving patterns | Total instances |
|----------|----------|---------------|----------|
| Train | 17,388 |  96,012 | 113,400 |
| Test  | 7,310 |  41,290 | 48,600 |

**Math question:** Find necessary or sufficient conditions to distinguish between 
weaving pattern matrices and non-weaving pattern matrices. These should be more efficient than the 
\\(O(n^2)\\) algorithm that can be found in the references above.

**ML task:** Train a model to classify whether a \\(\{1, 2, . . . , 7\}\\)-
matrix is a weaving pattern or not. This task is framed as
binary classification. Extract mathematical insights from a performant model.

## Small model performance

We provide some basic baselines for this task. Benchmarking details can be found in the associated paper.

| Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing largest class | 
|----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------|
| \\(n= 7\\) | \\(85.8\%\\) | \\(99.3\% \pm 0.2\%\\) | \\(99.9\% \pm 0.4\%\\)| \\(85.0\%\\) |

The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training.

- **Curated by:** Herman Chau
- **Funded by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- **Language(s) (NLP):** NA
- **License:** CC-by-2.0

### Dataset Sources

Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/weaving_patterns).

- **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/weaving_patterns)
  
## Uses

This dataset was generated to study ML model's ability yield insight on an open 
problem in algebraic combinatorics, specifically, the problem of better understanding commutation 
equivalent representations of reduced words coresponding to the longest permutation.

### Direct Use

We use this dataset for a classification task distinguishing between weaving and non-weaving patterns.

### Out-of-Scope Use

None.

## Dataset Structure

Each matrix is stored on a single line in row-major format (see example above).

## Dataset Creation

Data generation scripts can be found 
[here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/weaving_patterns).

### Curation Rationale

This dataset was generated as a test of current AI system's ability to advance 
research mathematics.

#### Who are the source data producers?

Herman Chau wrote code to generate this dataset.

## Bias, Risks, and Limitations

We only provide data for weaving patterns of size \\(6 \times 5\\) and \\(7 \times 6\\) in this repository. 
We are happy to generate (subsets) of datasets for larger values of \\(n \times n-1\)).

## Citation

**BibTeX:**

    @article{chau2025machine,
        title={Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics},
        author={Chau, Herman and Jenne, Helen and Brown, Davis and He, Jesse and Raugas, Mark and Billey, Sara and Kvinge, Henry},
        journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366},
        year={2025}
    }

**APA:**

Chau, H., Jenne, H., Brown, D., He, J., Raugas, M., Billey, S., & Kvinge, H. (2025). Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366.

## Dataset Card Contact

Henry Kvinge, acdbenchdataset@gmail.com

## References

\[1\] Felsner, Stefan. "On the number of arrangements of pseudolines." Proceedings of the twelfth annual Symposium on Computational Geometry. 1996.  
\[2\] Chau, Herman. "On enumerating higher bruhat orders through deletion and contraction." arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10532 (2024).