Upload v5-HOT/explanatory/pilot/20260607_185756_64618.json with huggingface_hub

v5-HOT/explanatory/pilot/20260607_185756_64618.json

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+{
+  "schema_version": "1.2",
+  "session_id": "20260607_185756",
+  "completion_code": "64618",
+  "condition": "explanatory",
+  "run_mode": "pilot",
+  "walkthrough_started_at": "2026-06-07T18:57:52.106000+10:00",
+  "argument_submitted_at": null,
+  "started_at": "2026-06-07T18:57:56.252237+10:00",
+  "ended_at": "2026-06-07T18:57:56.252586+10:00",
+  "model": "gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17",
+  "case_id": "ai-predictive-analytics",
+  "perfect_answer": null,
+  "discussion_plan": null,
+  "dominant_framework": null,
+  "manager_history": [],
+  "turns": [],
+  "feedback": [],
+  "feedback_current": {},
+  "argument_snapshots": [
+    {
+      "n": 1,
+      "timestamp": "2026-06-07T18:57:56.252575+10:00",
+      "trigger": "submit_initial_confirm",
+      "text": "I believe that the AI system is in most cases ethically unacceptable, and in all cases pedagogically unacceptable. First, the datafication of students' learning experiences introduces several well documented harms such as bias, epistemic injustice, surveillance, transparency etc.  But perhaps, for me, the thing that is most ethically questionable is student agency. In a Kantian sense, they are (and their experiences) are being used as a means to an end. They are subject to a system that they did not design, control, or understand, and have no say in it's deployment and governance.\\n\\nThe tool is also not only unethical, but pedagogically futile as well. Learning and being part of a university is a deeply relational, embodied, and localised. As such, quantified measures of learning experiences such as this one, aren't fit for purpose.\n",
+      "char_count": 846,
+      "changed_since_prev": null
+    }
+  ],
+  "essays": {
+    "argument": {
+      "text": "I believe that the AI system is in most cases ethically unacceptable, and in all cases pedagogically unacceptable. First, the datafication of students' learning experiences introduces several well documented harms such as bias, epistemic injustice, surveillance, transparency etc.  But perhaps, for me, the thing that is most ethically questionable is student agency. In a Kantian sense, they are (and their experiences) are being used as a means to an end. They are subject to a system that they did not design, control, or understand, and have no say in it's deployment and governance.\\n\\nThe tool is also not only unethical, but pedagogically futile as well. Learning and being part of a university is a deeply relational, embodied, and localised. As such, quantified measures of learning experiences such as this one, aren't fit for purpose.\n",
+      "submitted_at": "2026-06-07T18:57:56.252505+10:00",
+      "char_count": 846
+    }
+  },
+  "upload_errors": [],
+  "session_summary": null
+}