You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

CWRU — bearing fault classification from the envelope spectrum (reasoning track)

Part of the AI4Manufacturing FORGE corpus (Category C, task T-C1). Each record is the envelope spectrum of a 1 s rolling-element-bearing vibration window with the fault frequencies marked — the representation that supports faithful compute-then-check chain-of-thought. reasoning is empty here; a planned CWRU-annotated sibling will fill it (not yet published).

Records: 690 (splits {'train': 564, 'test': 126}); labels {'inner_race': 179, 'ball': 39, 'outer_race': 437, 'normal': 35}; evidence_tier {'confirmed': 690}.

Schema (7-field unified record)

field meaning
query the classification instruction (one of 30 deterministic paraphrases per representation)
image the rendered signal image (bytes embedded)
annot gold fault class: normal / inner_race / outer_race / ball
reasoning chain-of-thought (empty here; a planned -annotated sibling will fill it — not yet published)
cate / task C / T-C1 (signal fault classification)
metadata JSON string: representation, features, fault_freqs, computed_verdict, computed_snr, evidence_tier, sr_nondiagnosable, anomaly, size_in, load_hp, or_position, bearing, bearing_group, channel, rpm, fs, fr_hz, file_number, window_idx, image_sha256, split

Splits

train / test, bearing-wise (leakage-safe): all loads + both sample rates of a physical bearing stay on one side. normal is a single healthy bearing, so it is entirely in train and the test split is fault-only (inner/outer/ball from unseen bearings).

Provenance & reproducibility

Generated deterministically by forge_agent/examples/cwru/convert.py (250c7e5f89) → forge_model/CWRU/convert_cwru.py (229ee98152); see provenance.json for the full record.

Cleaning (all encoded in the pinned code): excluded the NTN 0.028″ files 3001–3008 (wrong bearing geometry) and the corrupt 191; flagged Smith & Randall (2015) non-diagnosable (sr_nondiagnosable) and acquisition-anomaly files; bearing-wise leakage-safe split (all loads + both sample rates of a physical bearing stay on one side). Evidence-gated, conflict-free release: a computed evidence_tier (from the label-independent envelope-spectrum detector, cross-checked against the Smith & Randall expert grades) curates the published set so every image supports — and never fights — its label. The spectrum/reasoning repo keeps confirmed only (faithful compute-then-check CoT); the perception repo keeps confirmed + non-conflicting weak (weak records where the detector confidently found a different pattern than the gold are dropped).

Caveats

  • Ball is the hard class — Smith & Randall (2015) grade most CWRU ball faults non-diagnosable (intermittent load-zone contact + smeared BSF), so many ball windows are weak/absent. The evidence gate keeps only the diagnosable ones, so the reasoning/spectrum track has the fewest ball records (confirmed-only) while perception also admits weak ball. A property of the data, not the converter.
  • Class balance — after gating, normal is the minority (CWRU ships few baseline files) and outer_race the majority; per-class counts are in the header above.
  • Eval: use the provided bearing-wise split; the within-condition (per-load) split inflates accuracy.

Source & license

Source: Case Western Reserve University Bearing Data Center (engineering.case.edu/bearingdatacenter), openly available for research. Diagnosability grades and anomaly flags from W. A. Smith & R. B. Randall, MSSP 64–65 (2015) 100–131; leakage-safe split per J. Hendriks et al., MSSP 169 (2022) 108732.

Downloads last month
98