You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

IMS / NASA-Bearing — perception representations (visual grounding)

The same IMS run-to-failure windows rendered as perception images — one HF config per representation, for the foundation model's visual grounding. Unlike the IMS (spectrum) repo, these are not for compute-then-check CoT (reasoning stays empty).

Configs

load_dataset("AI4Manufacturing/IMS-perception", "spectrogram")
config records splits
spectrogram 609 {'train': 488, 'test': 121}
scalogram 609 {'train': 488, 'test': 121}
waveform 609 {'train': 488, 'test': 121}
reshaped 609 {'train': 488, 'test': 121}

Schema (7-field unified record)

field meaning
query the classification instruction (one of 30 deterministic paraphrases per representation)
image the rendered signal image (bytes embedded)
annot gold fault class: normal / inner_race / outer_race / ball
reasoning chain-of-thought (empty here; filled in the -annotated sibling)
cate / task C / T-C1 (signal fault classification)
metadata JSON string: representation, set, timestamp, time_frac, channel, bearing, bearing_group, rpm, fs, fr_hz, features, fault_freqs, computed_verdict, computed_snr, evidence_tier, image_sha256, split

Provenance & reproducibility

Generated deterministically by forge_agent/examples/ims/convert.py (250c7e5f89) → forge_model/IMS/convert_ims.py (229ee98152); see provenance.json.

Gold = the documented end-state defect (readme / manufacturer teardown): Set 1 → bearing 3 inner-race + bearing 4 roller(ball); Set 2 → bearing 1 outer-race; Set 3 → bearing 3 outer-race. normal = the early files of each run; fault = the late files of the failed bearing (per-set window from the degradation onset). A computed evidence_tier (confirmed/weak/absent) flags detectability.

Caveats

  • Evidence-gated, conflict-free release — every image supports (and never fights) its label. IMS faults are WEAK run-to-failure signatures (the dataset's own reference paper, Qiu/Lee/Lin JSV 2006, studies weak-signature detection), so we curate by a computed evidence_tier: the spectrum/reasoning track keeps only confirmed records (the label-independent envelope-spectrum detector independently finds the documented fault → faithful compute-then-check CoT); the perception tracks keep confirmed + non-conflicting weak — weak records where the detector confidently found a different pattern than the gold are dropped (notably ball windows scoring as cage: ball faults are cage-modulated, so the single-label gold and the detector legitimately disagree there).
  • inner_race is the scarce class — excluded from the first release, REINSTATED here. The original band-limited detector confirmed only ~8 inner-race spectrum windows ("too few to form a class"); the current full-band demodulation search recovers IMS's weak Set-1 signature and confirms 36 windows — more than the published ball class (30) — so the same evidence standard that excluded it now reinstates it. It remains the weakest class: ~78% of its raw windows are absent-tier (dropped per-record by the gate), and Set 1 ran two degrading bearings (inner-race B3 + ball B4) on one shaft. outer_race (Sets 2-3) is the clean, strong class.
  • Few distinct bearings — each fault class comes from one run-to-failure bearing, so a strict bearing-wise split is impossible within a class; the split is file-stratified. Treat cross-bearing generalization claims with care.

Source & license

Source: IMS / NASA-Bearing — NSF I/UCR Center for Intelligent Maintenance Systems (imscenter.net) with Rexnord Corp.; three test-to-failure runs on Rexnord ZA-2115 bearings at 2000 rpm. Reference: H. Qiu, J. Lee, J. Lin, J. Sound and Vibration 289 (2006) 1066–1090. Distributed via the NASA Prognostics Data Repository.

Downloads last month
135