ARC-Bench / tasks /ml /rubrics /ML07.json
StarThomas1002's picture
Add ARC-Bench: 55-topic autonomous-research benchmark across 5 domains
7ce68e5 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.68 kB
{
"id": "ml07-root",
"requirements": "A credible experiment studying text-feature-extraction trade-offs (count, TF-IDF, hashing) with Naive Bayes and linear SVM for document classification: multiple vectorizer+classifier pipelines are implemented, runs execute on multiple datasets, and results address H1/H2/H3 directionally.",
"judging_note": "Score on scientific substance and directional correctness of evidence, not on exact threshold satisfaction. Equivalent vectorizer/classifier substitutes (e.g., SGDClassifier in place of LinearSVC) should be credited when the scientific question is preserved.",
"weight": 1,
"sub_tasks": [
{
"id": "ml07-code",
"requirements": "Feature extractors and classifiers are implemented as distinct pipeline code paths enabling fair comparison.",
"weight": 2,
"sub_tasks": [
{
"id": "ml07-code-conditions",
"requirements": "The submission implements multiple text-classification pipelines combining a vectorizer (count, TF-IDF, or hashing) with a classifier (Multinomial Naive Bayes or LinearSVC-style linear model) as distinct code paths rather than a single reused model without feature changes.",
"weight": 12.5,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Code Development",
"finegrained_task_category": "Method Implementation"
},
{
"id": "ml07-code-datasets",
"requirements": "The submission uses multiple document datasets (including at least one 20newsgroups subset or comparable) with explicit train/test usage and preprocessing applied consistently across conditions.",
"weight": 6.25,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Code Development",
"finegrained_task_category": "Dataset and Model Acquisition"
},
{
"id": "ml07-code-fairness",
"requirements": "The experiment keeps comparable tokenization / n-gram choices across vectorizers where applicable and uses reasonable, shared hyperparameters (e.g., C for LinearSVC, alpha for MNB) so condition comparisons are fair.",
"weight": 6.25,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Code Development",
"finegrained_task_category": "Experimental Setup"
}
],
"task_category": null,
"finegrained_task_category": null
},
{
"id": "ml07-exec",
"requirements": "Execution logs predictive-quality and efficiency metrics per condition.",
"weight": 2,
"sub_tasks": [
{
"id": "ml07-exec-metrics",
"requirements": "Execution produces a machine-readable metrics artifact with numeric macro-F1 (or equivalent) and a wall-clock fit+predict time measure for each implemented (condition, dataset) cell.",
"weight": 16.6667,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Code Execution",
"finegrained_task_category": "Evaluation, Metrics & Benchmarking"
},
{
"id": "ml07-exec-repeats",
"requirements": "Execution repeats evaluation where randomness exists (e.g., synthetic-data generation or classifier random_state) across multiple seeds and reports dispersion for macro-F1. Deterministic pipelines may report a single run if no stochasticity is involved.",
"weight": 8.3333,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Code Execution",
"finegrained_task_category": "Evaluation, Metrics & Benchmarking"
}
],
"task_category": null,
"finegrained_task_category": null
},
{
"id": "ml07-results",
"requirements": "Results directly address H1/H2/H3 with an interpretable narrative of accuracy-efficiency trade-offs.",
"weight": 3,
"sub_tasks": [
{
"id": "ml07-result-h1",
"requirements": "The submission ranks conditions by macro-F1 per dataset and conveys whether TF-IDF + linear SVM (or equivalent) tends to be the top pipeline \u2014 judge directionally against H1.",
"weight": 20.0,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Result Analysis",
"finegrained_task_category": "Logging, Analysis & Presentation"
},
{
"id": "ml07-result-h2",
"requirements": "The submission compares the runtime of hashing-vectorizer-based pipelines vs TF-IDF-based ones and conveys whether hashing yields a meaningful runtime reduction.",
"weight": 10.0,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Result Analysis",
"finegrained_task_category": "Logging, Analysis & Presentation"
},
{
"id": "ml07-result-h3",
"requirements": "The submission compares count + Multinomial NB against TF-IDF + linear SVM on macro-F1 and conveys whether count-MNB is approximately competitive on at least one dataset \u2014 judge directionally against H3.",
"weight": 10.0,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Result Analysis",
"finegrained_task_category": "Evaluation, Metrics & Benchmarking"
},
{
"id": "ml07-result-writeup",
"requirements": "The README or writeup describes methods and datasets, reports the key metric numbers, conveys per-hypothesis outcomes (supported / refuted / inconclusive), and notes limitations such as dataset scope, preprocessing choices, timing noise, and hyperparameter coverage. No strict word-count requirement.",
"weight": 10.0,
"sub_tasks": [],
"task_category": "Result Analysis",
"finegrained_task_category": "Logging, Analysis & Presentation"
}
],
"task_category": null,
"finegrained_task_category": null
}
],
"task_category": null,
"finegrained_task_category": null
}