StarThomas1002's picture
Add ARC-Bench: 55-topic autonomous-research benchmark across 5 domains
7ce68e5 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
8.54 kB
# ============================================================================
# P05 — ALP EFT $E_T^\mathrm{miss}$ distribution in $pp \to a W^\pm \gamma$
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Adapts ColliderAgent paper-reproduction prompt:
# /home/shiqiu/ColliderAgent/paper-reproduction/1701.05379/prompt_figure_8.md
# Source: arXiv:1701.05379 — bosonic ALP EFT at the LHC, MET shape in
# $pp \to a W^\pm \gamma$ as a probe of $c_{\tilde W}$ (with photophobic
# choice $c_{\tilde B} = -\tan^2\theta_W \cdot c_{\tilde W}$).
# ============================================================================
id: P05
title: "Reproducing the normalized $E_T^\\mathrm{miss}$ shape in $pp \\to a W^\\pm \\gamma$ from a photophobic ALP EFT"
arxiv_id: "1701.05379"
venue: "ARC-Bench Physics 2026"
paper_asset: null
synthesis: |
Reproducing the normalized $E_T^\mathrm{miss}$ distribution for the
process $pp \to a W^\pm (\to \ell^\pm \nu)\, \gamma$ at $\sqrt{s}=13$
TeV in the bosonic ALP EFT, as a benchmark of the agent's ability to
handle a higher-dimensional EFT operator and parton-level missing-energy
reconstruction. The Lagrangian is
$\delta\mathcal{L}_a = c_{\tilde W} \mathcal{A}_{\tilde W} +
c_{\tilde B} \mathcal{A}_{\tilde B}$ with the photophobic constraint
$c_{\tilde B} = -\tan^2\theta_W \cdot c_{\tilde W}$ (so the
$a\gamma\gamma$ coupling vanishes), giving a single free Wilson
coefficient $c_{\tilde W}$. The diagnostic observable is the
normalized parton-level $E_T^\mathrm{miss} = |\vec p_T^{\,a} +
\vec p_T^{\,\nu}|$ shape in 50 bins over [0, 1000] GeV, with
generation cuts $p_T^{\gamma,\ell} > 20$ GeV, $|\eta^{\gamma,\ell}| < 2.5$.
A credible study (a) implements the photophobic ALP EFT (FeynRules
bosonic operators with $c_{\tilde B} = -\tan^2\theta_W \cdot c_{\tilde W}$),
(b) generates 500k LHE events at $f_a = 1000$ GeV, $m_a = 0.001$ GeV,
$c_{\tilde W} = 1$ with the nn23lo1 PDF, (c) sums $\vec p_T^{\,a}$ +
$\vec p_T^{\,\nu}$ from invisible final-state particles to reconstruct
$E_T^\mathrm{miss}$, and (d) plots the normalized histogram on log-y
$[10^{-4}, 1]$ over [0, 1000] GeV. Research question: *does the agent
reproduce the falling-then-flattening MET shape characteristic of a
derivative ALP coupling versus the steeply falling SM-like baseline,
matching Figure 8 of arXiv:1701.05379?*
hypotheses:
- id: H1
statement: "The peak of the normalized $E_T^\\mathrm{miss}$ distribution lies in the bin range $[100, 250]$ GeV, consistent with the published shape."
measurable: true
- id: H2
statement: "The integrated normalized fraction of events with $E_T^\\mathrm{miss} > 500$ GeV is in $[0.05, 0.30]$ at $c_{\\tilde W}=1$, $f_a=1$ TeV (long high-MET tail from the derivative ALP coupling)."
measurable: true
- id: H3
statement: "Acceptance after the published photon and lepton cuts ($p_T > 20$ GeV, $|\\eta| < 2.5$) is $\\geq 50\\%$ of generated events."
measurable: true
experiment_design:
research_question: "Does the agent reproduce the parton-level $E_T^\\mathrm{miss}$ shape for $pp \\to a W^\\pm \\gamma$, $W \\to \\ell\\nu$ at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV under the photophobic ALP EFT (Figure 8 of arXiv:1701.05379)?"
conditions:
- name: "alp_cw1_fa1tev"
description: "Bosonic ALP EFT at $c_{\\tilde W}=1$, $c_{\\tilde B}=-\\tan^2\\theta_W$, $f_a=1000$ GeV, $m_a=0.001$ GeV, 500k events at $\\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with nn23lo1 PDF."
- name: "alp_cw_variant"
description: "Sanity-check run at $c_{\\tilde W}=2$, $f_a=1000$ GeV; cross section should scale as $c_{\\tilde W}^2$ but normalized shape should be invariant."
baselines:
- "Shape-only normalization is its own baseline: deviation between $c_{\\tilde W}=1$ and $c_{\\tilde W}=2$ shapes should be statistical only"
metrics:
- name: "etmiss_peak_position_gev"
direction: "match_reference"
description: "$E_T^\\mathrm{miss}$ bin center of the peak of the normalized histogram."
- name: "high_metmiss_tail_fraction"
direction: "match_reference"
description: "Fraction of normalized events with $E_T^\\mathrm{miss} > 500$ GeV."
- name: "cut_acceptance"
direction: "match_reference"
description: "Acceptance fraction after photon + lepton fiducial cuts."
datasets:
- process_id: "pp_to_aWgamma_Wlnu"
sqrt_s_TeV: 13
description: "Parton-level $pp \\to a W^\\pm \\gamma$ with $W \\to \\ell\\nu$ in the photophobic ALP EFT."
compute_requirements:
gpu_required: false
estimated_wall_clock_sec: 3600
rubric_path: "experiments/arc_bench/config/physics/rubrics/P05.json"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Agent-mode requirements (consumed by researchclaw.pipeline.requirements_judge
# at stage 15 RESEARCH_DECISION). Schema mirrors B01.yaml:
# id — stable identifier
# type — advisory hint to the LLM judge (numeric | artifact | discussion)
# description — natural-language statement of what must be true post-run
# must_pass — true → unmet ⇒ rerun (1 retry max); false → optional
#
# The five generic must_pass items apply uniformly across P01-P10; the sixth
# is topic-specific (mirrors this manifest's H1). The two must_pass=false
# items reward mechanistic interpretation and MC-reproducibility metadata
# without blocking proceed-vs-rerun on them.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
requirements:
- id: req_results_json
type: artifact
description: >-
A canonical results.json file exists at the workspace root with at least
the keys: primary_metric (number), metric_key (string), metrics (object
with numeric keys), hypotheses (object with h1/h2/h3 entries each
carrying a `supported` boolean), summary (non-empty string).
must_pass: true
- id: req_metrics_numeric
type: numeric
description: >-
results.json metrics MUST contain at least 3 numeric (non-null, finite)
values directly relevant to the headline physics observable named in
the experiment_design.metrics list above — these are the numbers the
paper will report in its Results section.
must_pass: true
- id: req_hypotheses_supported_flags
type: discussion
description: >-
results.json hypotheses.h1/h2/h3 each MUST have an explicit `supported`
boolean AND a `details` string ≥ 40 characters quoting the numerical
evidence (specific values + their source artifact) used to reach the
verdict.
must_pass: true
- id: req_publication_figure
type: artifact
description: >-
At least one publication-quality figure file (PDF or PNG, ≥150 DPI for
raster) exists under figures/ or output/figures/ with axes labeled in
physical units (GeV / pb / fb / dimensionless) and a legend if multiple
series are plotted. The figure must directly support a hypothesis
verdict.
must_pass: true
- id: req_model_implementation
type: artifact
description: >-
The BSM Lagrangian is implemented either as a FeynRules .fr file
(models/*.fr) with a matching UFO directory (models/*_UFO/ containing
at least particles.py, parameters.py, couplings.py, vertices.py), OR
as analytic Python code that explicitly computes the cross sections
from the Lagrangian terms. A pure SM baseline with no BSM piece is
NOT sufficient.
must_pass: true
- id: req_met_peak_bin
type: numeric
description: >-
results.json metrics MUST report the peak bin of the normalized E_T^miss distribution; the bin center must lie in [100, 250] GeV and the distribution must integrate to 1.0 (normalized).
must_pass: true
- id: req_mechanistic_writeup
type: discussion
description: >-
The summary or structured_results section provides a one-paragraph
mechanistic interpretation of WHY the headline observable comes out the
way it does (which interference / propagator structure / cut effect
drives the result). Nice-to-have, not blocking proceed.
must_pass: false
- id: req_mc_reproducibility
type: discussion
description: >-
results.json or a sibling reproducibility section names: (a) the
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO version, (b) the PDF set used (if applicable), (c)
at least one explicit random seed. Required for full reproducibility
but not for scientific correctness.
must_pass: false