{ "id": "ml16-root", "requirements": "A credible experiment comparing bandit algorithms (epsilon-greedy, UCB1, Thompson sampling, Exp3, or equivalents) under stationary and drifting synthetic regimes: algorithms are implemented with a common interface, experiments cover multiple environments with repeated seeds, and results address H1/H2/H3 directionally using cumulative regret.", "judging_note": "Score on scientific substance and directional correctness of evidence, not on exact numeric thresholds. Well-motivated algorithm variants (e.g., UCB-V, linear Thompson) should be credited when they test the same scientific question.", "weight": 1, "sub_tasks": [ { "id": "ml16-code", "requirements": "The bandit algorithms and synthetic environments are implemented correctly.", "weight": 2, "sub_tasks": [ { "id": "ml16-code-algos", "requirements": "The submission implements multiple distinct algorithm code paths \u2014 typically including epsilon-greedy, UCB1, Thompson sampling, and/or Exp3 \u2014 with per-round action selection and update logic that are not identical wrappers.", "weight": 12.5, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Code Development", "finegrained_task_category": "Method Implementation" }, { "id": "ml16-code-envs", "requirements": "The submission defines multiple synthetic bandit environments including at least one stationary and one drifting regime, with reproducible seed control and oracle best-arm rewards per round for regret computation.", "weight": 6.25, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Code Development", "finegrained_task_category": "Experimental Setup" }, { "id": "ml16-code-thompson-exp3", "requirements": "If Thompson sampling and/or Exp3 are included, implementation uses sampling-based posterior decisions (Thompson) and probability-weighted action selection with importance-weighted updates (Exp3), rather than greedy mean selection.", "weight": 6.25, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Code Development", "finegrained_task_category": "Method Implementation" } ], "task_category": null, "finegrained_task_category": null }, { "id": "ml16-exec", "requirements": "Execution produces regret metrics across algorithms and datasets.", "weight": 2, "sub_tasks": [ { "id": "ml16-exec-runs", "requirements": "Execution runs multiple seeds per (algorithm, dataset) cell for multiple environments and logs final cumulative-regret values with mean and dispersion. Honest small-seed runs with variance reported are preferable to a single run.", "weight": 16.6667, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Code Execution", "finegrained_task_category": "Evaluation, Metrics & Benchmarking" }, { "id": "ml16-exec-artifacts", "requirements": "A machine-readable results artifact is produced containing dataset-wise metrics for each implemented algorithm, including cumulative regret.", "weight": 8.3333, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Code Execution", "finegrained_task_category": "Logging, Analysis & Presentation" } ], "task_category": null, "finegrained_task_category": null }, { "id": "ml16-results", "requirements": "Findings address H1/H2/H3 directionally and summarize implications.", "weight": 3, "sub_tasks": [ { "id": "ml16-result-h1", "requirements": "The submission compares stationary-regime cumulative regret between epsilon-greedy and {UCB1, Thompson} and conveys whether the principled algorithms are meaningfully better \u2014 judge directionally against H1.", "weight": 20.0, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Result Analysis", "finegrained_task_category": "Evaluation, Metrics & Benchmarking" }, { "id": "ml16-result-h2", "requirements": "The submission evaluates drifting-regime cumulative regret and conveys whether more exploratory algorithms (epsilon-greedy or Exp3) outperform UCB1 on most drifting datasets (H2).", "weight": 10.0, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Result Analysis", "finegrained_task_category": "Evaluation, Metrics & Benchmarking" }, { "id": "ml16-result-h3", "requirements": "The submission conveys whether any single algorithm dominates across all environments or whether winners are mixed (H3), with supporting tables or summaries.", "weight": 10.0, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Result Analysis", "finegrained_task_category": "Logging, Analysis & Presentation" }, { "id": "ml16-result-writeup", "requirements": "The README or writeup describes setup, reports key cumulative-regret results per environment, conveys per-hypothesis outcomes (supported / refuted / inconclusive), and notes limitations (horizon length, hyperparameter sensitivity, synthetic-only scope). No strict word-count requirement.", "weight": 10.0, "sub_tasks": [], "task_category": "Result Analysis", "finegrained_task_category": "Logging, Analysis & Presentation" } ], "task_category": null, "finegrained_task_category": null } ], "task_category": null, "finegrained_task_category": null }