Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,168 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# HumDial-EIBench
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
> A human-recorded multi-turn emotional intelligence benchmark for audio language models.
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
[](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.11594) [](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ASLP-lab/HumDial-EIBench) [](https://github.com/ASLP-lab/HumDial-EIBench)
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
</div>
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 12 |
+
<img src="assets/humdial-bench.png" alt="HumDial-EIBench pipeline and task overview" width="90%">
|
| 13 |
+
<p><em>Figure: Three-stage data pipeline and the four evaluation tasks in HumDial-EIBench.</em></p>
|
| 14 |
+
</div>
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
HumDial-EIBench is designed to evaluate whether audio language models (ALMs) truly understand emotion in speech, rather than relying on text transcription shortcuts.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
The benchmark is built from authentic human-recorded dialogues from the ICASSP 2026 HumDial Challenge and includes both Chinese and English subsets.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
---
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
## Why HumDial-EIBench
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
Existing ALM benchmarks often suffer from one or more of these issues:
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
- synthetic (TTS-only) speech instead of authentic human recordings
|
| 27 |
+
- single-turn settings that miss emotional evolution over context
|
| 28 |
+
- subjective open-ended scoring that confounds reasoning and generation quality
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
HumDial-EIBench addresses these gaps by combining:
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
- **real human multi-turn audio**
|
| 33 |
+
- **objective adversarial MCQ tasks for reasoning-heavy evaluation**
|
| 34 |
+
- **a dedicated acoustic-semantic conflict task**
|
| 35 |
+
- **separate diagnosis of textual empathy vs acoustic empathy**
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
---
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Benchmark at a Glance
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- **Total samples:** 1,077
|
| 42 |
+
- **Languages:** Chinese + English
|
| 43 |
+
- **Core goal:** diagnose emotional intelligence in ALMs across memory, reasoning, generation, and cross-modal robustness
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
| Task | Type | CN / EN | Turns | Main Metric |
|
| 46 |
+
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
| 47 |
+
| **Task 1: Emotional Trajectory Detection** | MCQ | 150 / 150 | 3-5 | Accuracy |
|
| 48 |
+
| **Task 2: Implicit Causal Reasoning** | MCQ | 134 / 149 | 3-5 | Accuracy |
|
| 49 |
+
| **Task 3: Empathetic Response Generation** | Open Generation | 144 / 150 | 3-5 | LLM + Human |
|
| 50 |
+
| **Task 4: Acoustic-Semantic Conflict** | MCQ | 100 / 100 | 1 | Accuracy |
|
| 51 |
+
| **Total** | | **528 / 549** | | |
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
---
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
## Four Tasks
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
### Task 1: Emotional Trajectory Detection
|
| 58 |
+
Track emotion changes across dialogue turns (for example, `E_t1 -> E_t2 -> E_t3`), instead of classifying isolated utterances.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
### Task 2: Implicit Causal Reasoning
|
| 61 |
+
Infer the latent emotional trigger from scattered context clues. The MCQ format helps reduce evaluator subjectivity.
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
### Task 3: Empathetic Response Generation
|
| 64 |
+
Evaluate generated responses in three dimensions:
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
- **D1: Textual Empathy & Insight** (LLM-judge, 1-5)
|
| 67 |
+
- **D2: Vocal Empathy & Congruence** (human rating, 1-5)
|
| 68 |
+
- **D3: Audio Quality & Naturalness** (human rating, 1-5)
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
### Task 4: Acoustic-Semantic Conflict
|
| 71 |
+
Test robustness when text sentiment contradicts vocal affect (for example, sarcasm-like cases), exposing text-dominance bias.
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
---
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
## Key Findings
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
- Most ALMs still struggle with **multi-turn emotional tracking** and **implicit causal reasoning**.
|
| 78 |
+
- Strong **decoupling exists between textual empathy and acoustic empathy**.
|
| 79 |
+
- All tested models show a notable **text-dominance bias** under acoustic-semantic conflict.
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
---
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
## Repository Structure
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
```text
|
| 86 |
+
.
|
| 87 |
+
├── assets/
|
| 88 |
+
│ └── humdial-bench.png
|
| 89 |
+
├── eval/
|
| 90 |
+
│ └── eval_task3.py
|
| 91 |
+
└── README.md
|
| 92 |
+
```
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
---
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
## Data and Code Access
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
- The dataset is publicly available on HuggingFace: [HumDial-EIBench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ASLP-lab/HumDial-EIBench)
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
---
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
## Evaluation Usage
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
### Task 3 (Empathetic Generation) Scoring
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
`eval/eval_task3.py` scores model outputs for D1/D2/D3 and writes per-sample + summary results.
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
#### Input format (`jsonl`)
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
```jsonc
|
| 112 |
+
{
|
| 113 |
+
"dialogue_id": "sample_001",
|
| 114 |
+
"turns": [
|
| 115 |
+
{
|
| 116 |
+
"input_emotion": "sad",
|
| 117 |
+
"input_text": "I've been feeling really overwhelmed lately...",
|
| 118 |
+
"response_text": "It sounds like you're carrying a lot right now.",
|
| 119 |
+
"response_audio": "outputs/sample_001_turn1.wav"
|
| 120 |
+
}
|
| 121 |
+
]
|
| 122 |
+
}
|
| 123 |
+
```
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
#### Run
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
```bash
|
| 128 |
+
python eval/eval_task3.py \
|
| 129 |
+
--model Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct \
|
| 130 |
+
--input_file results/task3_outputs.jsonl \
|
| 131 |
+
--output_file results/task3_scores.jsonl
|
| 132 |
+
```
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
The script automatically identifies the target evaluation turn (second non-neutral turn) and builds context from prior turns.
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
> Environment note: this script requires a GPU runtime and `vLLM`. Set the local judge checkpoint path in `eval/eval_task3.py` before running.
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
---
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
---
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
## Citation
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
If you find this work useful, please cite:
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 148 |
+
@misc{wang2026humdialeibenchhumanrecordedmultiturnemotional,
|
| 149 |
+
title={HumDial-EIBench: A Human-Recorded Multi-Turn Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Audio Language Models},
|
| 150 |
+
author={Shuiyuan Wang and Zhixian Zhao and Hongfei Xue and Chengyou Wang and Shuai Wang and Hui Bu and Xin Xu and Lei Xie},
|
| 151 |
+
year={2026},
|
| 152 |
+
eprint={2604.11594},
|
| 153 |
+
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
| 154 |
+
primaryClass={eess.AS},
|
| 155 |
+
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11594},
|
| 156 |
+
}
|
| 157 |
+
```
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
## License
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
The code in this repository is released under the **Apache 2.0 License**.
|
| 162 |
+
|
| 163 |
+
## Contact
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
- **Issues**: Please open a GitHub Issue for bug reports or suggestions.
|
| 166 |
+
- **Email**: wangshuiyuan@mail.nwpu.edu.cn, lxie@nwpu.edu.cn
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
|