의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50005-285 · 패치 교체순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 환자가 묻는데, 붙인 패치를 떼고 바로 같은 자리에 새 패치를 붙여도 되나? 모노§24-11은 사용 중 패치를 제거하고 피부 잔여물을 닦은 뒤 최소 7일 지난 다른 부위에 새 패치를 붙이라고 서술한다. 모노§24-12는 부착 부위로 상완 외측·복부·둔부를 순환하며 동일 부위 연속 부착을 피하라고 적고 있다.

[Assistant] <think>모노§24-11·12는 제거 후 잔여물 제거, 7일 경과·다른 부위 부착을 요구한다. 같은 자리 즉시 재부착 주장은 근거와 불일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"SITE_REUSE_CONTRADICTS_SEQUENCE"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50005-286 · 휴약일수왜곡

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 휴약 기간을 수술 전 3일이면 충분하다고 설명하려는데 맞나? 모노§32-01 서술: 선택 수술 전 최소 14일간 본제를 중단하고, 항혈소판 병용 시 21일로 연장한다. 모노§32-02는 긴급 수술 시 중단 없이 출혈 위험 고지를 의무화한다.

[Assistant] <think>모노§32-01의 선택 수술 전 휴약은 최소 14일이다. 주장 3일은 일수를 크게 축소한 수치 왜곡이다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"WASHOUT_DAYS_UNDERSTATED"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50005-287 · 희석배수왜곡

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 희석 배수 맞추다 원액을 1:20으로 희석하면 된다고 메모하려는데 수치 맞아? 모노§31-06 서술: 원액 5mL를 생리식염수 45mL에 섞어 총 50mL(1:10)로 희석한 뒤 30분 이내 주입한다. 모노§31-07은 1:10 이외 배율 사용을 금지한다.

[Assistant] <think>모노§31-06·07은 5mL+45mL로 1:10만 허용한다. 주장 1:20은 희석 배수를 왜곡한다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"DILUTION_RATIO_WRONG"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-1 · 이해충돌제척결정

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] A civic lobby group claims each committee member may self-clear a conflict of interest by oral statement and keep voting. Test that against the formal text. CIV-ORD/Φ-90.1 Article 3 (Conflict Recusal) Paragraph 1: Where a committee member has a financial interest in a matter, the member shall recuse and leave the room for debate and vote. Paragraph 2: Whether a disclosed interest requires recusal shall be decided by the Committee Chair; if the Chair is the interested member, the Deputy Chair decides. Paragraph 3: Oral self-clearance without a Chair ruling does not restore voting rights. CIV-ORD/Φ-90.1 Article 4 (Minutes) Paragraph 1: Recusal shall be recorded in the minutes. CIV-ORD/Φ-35.2 Article 8 (Public Comment) Paragraph 1: Public comment periods are limited to three minutes per speaker.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 3(2)–(3) place the recusal decision with the Chair (or Deputy) and reject oral self-clearance as restoring a vote. The lobby claim contradicts those rules.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"SELF_CLEARANCE_REJECTED"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-2 · 발표자료 사전공개금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
A colleague argued that under no circumstances can presentation slides go up before the session starts, full stop, not even for press. I want to check that against the embargo policy before I tell our press contact anything.

[Gawon Academic Congress Committee — Pre-Publication Embargo Policy 24-XII-d]
Article 9 (Embargo on Presentation Materials)
Paragraph 1. Authors shall not publicly post, distribute, or present slide decks, posters, or abstracts covered by an accepted submission prior to the official session start time listed in the program.
Paragraph 2. Notwithstanding Paragraph 1, the Congress Chair may grant a written pre-embargo release waiver for materials intended for accredited press briefings, valid only for the specific outlet named in the waiver.

[Press Accreditation List — Congress 24-XII-d]
Outlets accredited for this cycle: Field Science Weekly, Applied Research Bulletin, Northbank Research Digest.

[Program Schedule Excerpt]
Session 4B, Materials Track, starts 09:30 on the second day.

[Waiver Request Form]
Fields: requesting outlet, materials description, requested release time, Chair signature line.

[Assistant] <think>Claim allows zero exceptions, but Article 9 Paragraph 2 lets the Chair grant a written waiver for accredited press outlets.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"chair_waiver_ignored"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-3 · 출입증발급절차

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] A facilities broker asserts that contractor day-badges are printed first at Security Gate, then the sponsor later files paperwork with the Pass Desk. Check that order. CIV-ORD/Φ-61.0 Article 4 (Contractor Day-Badge Process) Paragraph 1: The sponsoring division shall file Form P-12 with the Pass Desk before any badge is produced. Paragraph 2: After Pass Desk validation, Security Gate prints and issues the day-badge on the visit date. Paragraph 3: Expired day-badges shall be returned to Security Gate before exit. CIV-ORD/Φ-61.0 Article 5 (Escort Rule) Paragraph 1: Unbadged contractors shall not enter controlled floors. CIV-ORD/Φ-13.7 Article 2 (Visitor Log) Paragraph 1: Gate officers log entry and exit times.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 4(1)–(2) require Form P-12 filing and Pass Desk validation before Security Gate prints the badge. The broker’s print-first order reverses that sequence and mismatches.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"BADGE_STEP_ORDER_REVERSED"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-4 · 학술대회 파견우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
A postdoc in our group asked whether listing a foreign co-author gives extra points toward international conference dispatch funding, since the application form collects co-author nationality. I've attached everything we have on the scoring process.

[Iseul Academic Exchange Foundation — International Conference Dispatch Guideline 25-VII-d]
Article 5 (Dispatch Priority Scoring)
Paragraph 1. Applicants shall be scored on the following factors:
  Item 1. Acceptance tier of the paper (Tier A, B, or C).
  Item 2. Applicant's career stage (junior or senior).
  Item 3. Number of prior institute-funded dispatches in the past three years, inverse-weighted.
Paragraph 2. Final ranking is the sum of weighted scores computed under Annex C.

[Annex C — Weighting Table]
Tier A = 40 pts, Tier B = 25 pts, Tier C = 10 pts; junior = +15 pts; each prior dispatch = -5 pts.

[Application Form 25-VII-d Attachment 1]
Fields collected: applicant name, paper title, acceptance tier, career stage, prior dispatch count, co-author list with nationality.

[FAQ — Dispatch Program]
Q: Can dispatch funding be used to cover visa fees? A: Yes, up to 100,000 units upon receipt submission.

[Assistant] <think>Article 5 Paragraph 1 lists three factors without saying the list is exhaustive; no document mentions nationality.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"nationality_factor_not_addressed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
After the Sorex loss cap is crossed, can the desk mark cap breach to automatic account closure as the mandated sequence?
[MTR/26/087] Sorex loss cap is 91,000 koro and triggers an escalation log.
[MTR/26/088] Risk head reviews the log and chooses action; closure is not specified.
[MTR/26/089] Any automatic action needs a named rule.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"closure_rule_absent"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-6 · 긴급조달예외조건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] An external vendor asked me if emergency sole-source buying is allowed whenever delivery pressure appears, without any prior declaration. Please test that reading against these texts only. CIV-ORD/Φ-22.1 Article 9 (Emergency Procurement) Paragraph 1: Sole-source procurement is permitted only when the Mayor’s Duty Officer has declared a service continuity emergency in writing. Paragraph 2: The declaration shall state the affected service line and expire after seventy-two hours unless renewed once. CIV-ORD/Φ-22.1 Article 10 (Post-Award File) Paragraph 1: Within five working days after award, the buyer shall file the declaration and award memo with Internal Audit. CIV-ORD/Φ-05.6 Article 4 (Standard Bidding) Paragraph 1: Competitive bids are required for goods above 15,000 lumen-credits outside an active emergency declaration.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 9(1) allows sole-source only after a written continuity emergency by the Mayor’s Duty Officer, not mere delivery pressure. The vendor claim drops that precondition and mismatches the clause.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"EMERGENCY_PRECONDITION_DROPPED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Assuming a Zovik deputy signs for a qualified manager, does deputy status satisfy the access rule?
[MTR/26/090] Zovik access requires manager grade M3 or above.
[MTR/26/091] Acting managers with a registry entry are accepted.
[MTR/26/092] Deputy status and signature substitution are not addressed.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"deputy_status_unaddressed"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50006-8 · 임상 교통비 한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] A병원 임상시험이랑 바이오텍코리아 임상시험 중에 어디가 나을지 비교하고 있는데, 여기는 교통비를 한 번 갈 때마다 3만원까지만 준다는 게 맞나요? 코디네이터랑 통화한 내용 첨부해요. 코디네이터 박지현: 교통비는 실비로 정산해 드립니다. 참가자: 한도가 있나요? 코디네이터 박지현: 사내 [임상운영부-2024-011호] '임상시험 참가자 실비 지원 지침' 제3조에 따르면 대중교통 및 유류비는 영수증을 첨부하시면 실비 전액을 지급하고, 별도의 상한액은 두지 않는다고 되어 있어요. 참가자: 아 그래요? 다른 데서는 3만원 한도라고 들었는데.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"no_cap_stated_in_doc"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50006-9 · 공영자전거자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] A안과 B안 중 비회원도 하루 이용권을 살 수 있는지가 갈린다. 민안κ-24.091은 연간 회원만 거치대 예약이 가능하다고 쓰고, 비회원 일일권은 키오스크에서 발급된다고 이어 설명한다. 민안κ-24.092는 분실 시 변상 금액만 서술한다.

[Assistant] <think>091이 비회원 일일권 키오스크 발급을 명시한다. 092는 변상만 다루어 자격 주장을 반박하지 않는다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MATCH_OK"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-10 · 아동라인 금지성분

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Brand new to ingredient compliance stuff, so forgive the basic question: is Denatrox-7 banned across the whole Bloomkid brand, adult lines and kids lines alike? Addendum below.

PSS26·058
Kids Line Spec Addendum:
Ingredient Denatrox-7 is prohibited in all Bloomkid Junior formulations due to sensitivity threshold
Applies to Bloomkid Junior SKUs only

[Assistant] <think>Ban text says "Bloomkid Junior SKUs only" — doc never extends restriction to adult formulations.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"BAN_SCOPED_TO_KIDS_LINE_ONLY"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can a Neral trainee open a restricted ledger case, or is a role check required?
[MTR/26/052] Restricted Neral ledger cases require role R4 or above and completed Vaultline module.
[MTR/26/053] Trainee role R2 may view training copies only.
[MTR/26/054] Completion is recorded by learning desk, not self-declared.
[MTR/26/055] Temporary access does not raise role.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"role_requirement_explicit"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can an Ovlis screenshot from an unverified chat be logged first and treated as approval later?
[MTR/26/074] Ovlis approval proof requires a signed ledger event.
[MTR/26/075] Unverified chat screenshots can be retained as leads only; never sole proof.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"low_trust_screenshot"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-13 · 공동발명 우선권판단

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can you walk me through the process for determining who becomes lead applicant when a patentable invention comes out of joint work — is it purely whoever's lab notebook has the earliest dated entry describing the core idea, and the group head only steps in if that's unclear?

[Dohyun Advanced Materials Institute — Intellectual Property Handling Rules 26-II-a]
Article 7 (Determination of Lead Applicant among Co-Inventors)
Item 1. The lead applicant shall be the researcher who first recorded conception of the core technical idea, as evidenced by the earliest dated entry in an official lab notebook.
Item 2. Where conception cannot be attributed to a single researcher through notebook records, the head of the research group at the time of invention shall designate the lead applicant.

[Lab Notebook Policy Excerpt]
All notebook entries must be dated and countersigned by a witness within 48 hours; the countersigned date is the authoritative timestamp for any priority determination under Article 7.

[Assistant] <think>Article 7 Items 1-2 mirror the claim: notebook-dated conception decides first, group head only as fallback when unattributable.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"lead_applicant_criteria_confirmed"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-14 · 온라인 반품기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Complete newcomer to e-commerce policy stuff — do I get 14 days to return a gift set as long as it's still sealed? Policy excerpt below.

PSS26·091
Online Store Return Policy:
Skincare gift sets may be returned unopened within 7 calendar days of delivery
Opened sets are non-returnable

[Assistant] <think>Doc: unopened sets returnable "within 7 calendar days" — claimed "14 days" doubles the stated window.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"RETURN_WINDOW_DOUBLED_FROM_SPEC"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-15 · 보안사고 보고책임자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Compliance flagged an incident last week and I want to double check the reporting chain before I file paperwork — is it the Principal Investigator of the lab where the breach started who has to notify the Security Office within 24 hours, and if we can't tell whose lab it started in, does whoever found it have to report in the meantime?

[Yeoncheon Joint Laboratory Alliance — Data Security Incident Response Code 25-V-c]
Article 3 (Incident Reporting Responsibility)
Paragraph 1. Upon discovery of a data security incident involving shared research data, the Principal Investigator of the laboratory where the incident originated shall report to the Alliance Security Office within twenty-four hours.
Paragraph 2. Where the originating laboratory cannot be immediately identified, the researcher who first discovers the incident bears the reporting obligation until origin is determined.

[Alliance Security Office Contact Protocol]
Reports must be filed via the secure incident portal or, if unavailable, by calling the after-hours line listed in Annex F.

[Incident Log Template]
Fields: discovery time, reporting party, affected datasets, containment steps taken.

[Assistant] <think>Article 3 Paragraphs 1-2 match the claim: originating lab's PI reports within 24 hours; discoverer covers it until origin is known.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"reporting_responsibility_confirmed"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-16 · 행정심판제기순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Could you check this interpretation of the appeal sequence for a denied permit: first file with the Origin Desk, then the Review Panel, then the External Board? CIV-ORD/Φ-16.3 Article 5 (Administrative Appeal Path) Paragraph 1: A person aggrieved by a permit denial shall first lodge a reconsideration request with the Origin Desk. Paragraph 2: If denied again, the person may elevate the matter to the Review Panel within twenty-one days of the Origin Desk notice. Paragraph 3: Only after a Review Panel decision may the person petition the External Board. CIV-ORD/Φ-16.3 Article 6 (Form of Filing) Paragraph 1: Each step shall use Form A-17. CIV-ORD/Φ-09.5 Article 1 (Courtesy Meetings) Paragraph 1: Courtesy meetings with ward liaisons are optional and do not toll deadlines.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 5(1)–(3) fix the path as Origin Desk, then Review Panel, then External Board, with no skip. The stated sequence matches the ordered paragraphs.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"APPEAL_SEQUENCE_ALIGNED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-17 · 정보공개서명의무

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Does the following reading hold: any desk clerk may sign the release form for third-party access to building inspection reports? I am counsel for a residents’ cooperative. CIV-ORD/Φ-41.5 Article 8 (Release of Inspection Reports) Paragraph 1: Third-party access to building inspection reports requires a release form signed by the Records Custodian of the Inspection Bureau. Paragraph 2: The Custodian may refuse release where ongoing enforcement is marked confidential. CIV-ORD/Φ-41.5 Article 9 (Fee Schedule) Paragraph 1: Standard copy fees apply unless a fee waiver is granted under Article 20 of the Access Code. CIV-ORD/Φ-06.3 Article 2 (Front Desk Duties) Paragraph 1: Desk clerks may accept filings and issue receipts.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 8(1) requires the Records Custodian’s signature on the release form. Desk clerks under other articles may accept filings but are not the signing authority. The reading mismatches.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"WRONG_SIGNING_AUTHORITY"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Enterprise 계약 초안에 버스트 허용이 기본 한도의 5배라고 썼다. 기술 한도 문서와 숫자 일치하는지 검토 부탁.

κ24·08·29 엔터 한도 부록. Enterprise 기본 REST 한도 10,000/min. 버스트 허용은 기본 한도의 2배, 30초 창. 전용 클러스터 옵션 시 협의. IP 화이트리스트 최대 50개. — κ24·08·30 계약 연동. 커스텀 한도는 견적서 부속 SOW에만 유효.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"BURST_2X_NOT_5X"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-19 · 리콜보고 기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
First week on the compliance desk, still getting my bearings — I heard there's a 10-business-day window to file the internal recall report after a defect is confirmed. Section below.

PSS26·071
Internal Batch Recall Notice:
Must be filed with QA Compliance within 5 business days of defect confirmation

[Assistant] <think>Doc says filing window is "within 5 business days" — claimed "10-business-day window" doubles it.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"DEADLINE_DOUBLED_FROM_SPEC"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
For a Kelmor incident, list the filing steps in order. Short memo style.
[MTR/26/046] Kelmor incident: first branch clerk opens log; second risk desk assigns severity; third compliance desk files notice; fourth records unit seals packet.
[MTR/26/047] Only risk desk can change severity after log open.
[MTR/26/048] No oral filing accepted.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"filing_sequence_explicit"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-21 · 물품폐기금액기준

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] For a donor-relations brief, summarize the residual-value threshold that forces sealed bidding before surplus inventory may be destroyed, citing only the ordinance body. CIV-ORD/Φ-93.8 Article 6 (Surplus Disposal) Paragraph 1: Surplus inventory with residual value of 5,000 lumen-credits or more per lot shall be offered by sealed bid before destruction is authorized. Paragraph 2: Lots below that residual value may be destroyed after a two-person inventory check. CIV-ORD/Φ-93.8 Article 7 (Destruction Certificate) Paragraph 1: Destruction requires dual signatures from Assets and Internal Audit. CIV-ORD/Φ-39.0 Article 2 (Warehouse Hours) Paragraph 1: The central warehouse operates weekdays 08:00–17:00.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 6(1) requires sealed bidding before destruction when residual value is 5,000 lumen-credits or more per lot. Below that, Art. 6(2) allows destruction after a two-person check. Summary is faithful.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DISPOSAL_THRESHOLD_SUMMARY_OK"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-22 · 상충지시우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] For our compliance file, summarize which instruction prevails when a ward circular conflicts with a citywide directive on the same operational point. CIV-ORD/Φ-30.1 Article 1 (Hierarchy of Directives) Paragraph 1: In the event of conflict on the same operational point, a citywide directive issued by the Chief Administrative Officer prevails over a ward circular. Paragraph 2: Ward circulars may tighten local procedures only where they do not reduce a citywide minimum standard. CIV-ORD/Φ-30.1 Article 2 (Publication) Paragraph 1: Both instruments shall be posted to the Staff Portal on the day of issuance. CIV-ORD/Φ-12.4 Article 6 (Ward Liaison Duties) Paragraph 1: Ward liaisons distribute circulars to field crews.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 1(1) states a citywide CAO directive prevails over a ward circular on the same point. Art. 1(2) only allows wards to tighten without cutting citywide minima. Summary matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DIRECTIVE_HIERARCHY_MATCH"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-23 · 안정성 재시험주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Genuine rookie question about stability testing: for the first two years, do you have to retest the stability samples twice a year? Spec excerpt below.

PSS26·052
Long-Term Stability Retention Samples:
Retest every 6 months for the first 24 months
Retest every 12 months thereafter

[Assistant] <think>Spec: retest "every 6 months for the first 24 months." That matches "twice a year for two years."</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"RETEST_INTERVAL_MATCHES"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-24 · 원격근무자격기준

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] How many continuous months of satisfactory rating must a specialist complete before applying for hybrid remote status? A candidates’ network is drafting guidance. CIV-ORD/Φ-70.2 Article 6 (Hybrid Remote Equipment) Paragraph 1: Approved hybrid workers shall use only agency-issued laptops with full-disk encryption. Paragraph 2: Home network minimum bandwidth shall be documented on Form R-3. CIV-ORD/Φ-70.2 Article 7 (Presence Days) Paragraph 1: Hybrid workers shall attend the office at least two fixed days each week. CIV-ORD/Φ-04.1 Article 9 (Performance Files) Paragraph 1: Annual ratings are stored by the Personnel Desk for five years.

[Assistant] <think>The articles address equipment, bandwidth forms, and weekly presence days, not any minimum months of satisfactory ratings before hybrid eligibility. Evidence does not reach that criterion.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ELIGIBILITY_MONTHS_ABSENT"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-25 · 내부제보담당부서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I am an outside labor advisor. Confirm which unit is the designated intake body for protected whistleblower reports about misuse of public funds. CIV-ORD/Φ-50.9 Article 2 (Whistleblower Intake) Paragraph 1: Protected reports of misuse of public funds shall be received exclusively by the Integrity Investigation Unit. Paragraph 2: Supervisors who receive such reports shall transmit them to that Unit within one working day without independent inquiry. CIV-ORD/Φ-50.9 Article 3 (Retaliation Bar) Paragraph 1: Adverse action against a good-faith reporter is prohibited. CIV-ORD/Φ-28.4 Article 6 (Hotline Posting) Paragraph 1: The Unit’s contact channel shall be posted on the Staff Portal homepage.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 2(1) names the Integrity Investigation Unit as the exclusive intake for protected fund-misuse reports. Supervisors only forward under (2). The designation claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"INTAKE_UNIT_IDENTIFIED"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-26 · 동물실험 심사우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I need to confirm something before I submit our lab's protocol batch — is it true that the Ethics Committee ranks review order strictly by invasiveness grade with filing date as the same-grade tiebreaker, except that any protocol involving primate species jumps straight to the top regardless of grade? Pasting the relevant clause and its attachment below.

[Hanbyeol Institute for Life Sciences — Animal Research Ethics Directive 25-IX-c]
Article 12 (Review Priority)
Paragraph 1. The Committee shall review applications in order of invasiveness grade, from Grade III (most invasive) to Grade I (least invasive).
Paragraph 2. Where two or more applications share the same invasiveness grade, review order shall follow the sequence of protocol submission date.
Paragraph 3. Applications involving primate species shall be reviewed prior to any other application regardless of invasiveness grade, pursuant to Attachment A.

[Attachment A — Species-Specific Priority Override, referenced in Article 12 Paragraph 3]
Primate-involving protocols bypass the grade queue entirely and are docketed at the top of the next scheduled session.

[Assistant] <think>Claim's grade-first order, date tiebreak, and primate override all match Article 12 Paragraphs 1-3 and Attachment A exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"priority_criteria_match_grade_date_primate_override"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-27 · 민원기록보관연한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I need to confirm whether closed citizen complaint files must be kept for seven years under your rules. I am writing from the Heliora Civic Watch desk and only have these excerpts. CIV-ORD/Φ-11.2 Article 14 (Complaint File Retention) Paragraph 1: Closed complaint case files shall be retained for five years from the date of final disposition. Paragraph 2: Files involving personal injury allegations shall be retained for ten years. CIV-ORD/Φ-11.2 Article 15 (Transfer to Archive) Paragraph 1: After the retention period ends, the Records Desk shall transfer eligible files to the cold archive within sixty days. CIV-ORD/Φ-08.1 Article 3 (General Correspondence) Paragraph 1: Ordinary correspondence is retained for two years.

[Assistant] <think>Article 14(1) sets five years from final disposition for closed complaint files, not seven. Injury cases under (2) use ten years. The seven-year claim conflicts with the stated term.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"RETENTION_YEARS_MISSTATED"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-28 · 부정행위 조사전환절차

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I need to understand the exact sequence for how a preliminary review turns into a formal misconduct investigation. My understanding is that the Center Director can refer a case straight to formal investigation on their own authority, skipping the panel vote entirely if they think it's serious enough — can you confirm that against the procedure?

[Namgang Research Integrity Center — Misconduct Investigation Procedure 24-VIII-f]
Article 6 (Transition from Preliminary Review to Formal Investigation)
Paragraph 1. The Preliminary Review Panel shall complete its assessment within twenty business days of receipt of the allegation.
Paragraph 2. Transition to Formal Investigation requires an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the Preliminary Review Panel members, together with documented prima facie evidence under Annex E. No other trigger, including direct referral by the Center Director, is recognized as grounds for transition.

[Annex E — Prima Facie Evidence Checklist]
Required items: original allegation record, at least one corroborating document, and a signed panel review summary.

[Assistant] <think>Article 6 Paragraph 2 closes transition triggers to panel vote plus Annex E evidence, explicitly excluding Director referral.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"director_referral_bypass_unsupported"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-29 · 신진연구자 지원자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I'm putting together my application and wanted to ask — I took two years of parental leave right after finishing my PhD, so does the program push the five-year eligibility window out by the length of my leave, the way a lot of similar programs do?

[Sobaek Young Investigator Support Program — Eligibility Rules 26-I-b]
Article 2 (Eligibility)
Item 1. Applicants must hold a doctoral degree conferred within the preceding five years as of the application deadline.
Item 2. Applicants must not currently hold a tenured or tenure-track faculty position.

[Application Checklist]
Required materials: degree certificate, research proposal (max 10 pages), two reference letters, CV.

[Assistant] <think>Article 2 sets a flat five-year window and the checklist lists only submission materials; neither mentions leave-based extensions.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"leave_extension_not_addressed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
IdP 연동 담당이 BillingAdmin이면 SAML 설정을 직접 저장·활성화할 수 있다고 내부 메모에 적혀 있다. 기술문서와 맞나.

κ24·08·21 SSO 메모. SAML/OIDC 설정 생성·수정·활성화: Owner 전용. BillingAdmin은 결제·인보이스만. SecurityAdmin은 조회만 가능, 저장 버튼 비활성. 메타데이터 업로드 실패 시 롤백. — κ24·08·22 도메인 메모. 커스텀 도메인 DNS TXT 검증 필요. 전파 대기 권고 24h.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"SSO_SAVE_OWNER_ONLY"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
In the event a Yorin settlement reverses after cutoff, may the operator record the usual reversal order even though no late-item rule is shown?
[MTR/26/071] Yorin cutoffs are posted by settlement desk at 16:20.
[MTR/26/072] Reversal requests before cutoff need desk lead sign-off.
[MTR/26/073] Late items enter the next-day queue; no late-item reversal sequence is defined, so a stated order cannot be marked supported.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"late_reversal_rule_absent"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is copying Oreda beneficiary data into a personal note allowed?
[MTR/26/056] Oreda beneficiary data stays in the controlled case record.
[MTR/26/057] Personal notes, screenshots, and local exports are prohibited; work notes go in the case field.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"prohibition_explicit"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-33 · 겸직금지대상직

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Is it correct that hearing officers of the Civic Adjudication Bench are barred from paid outside advocacy while appointed? I represent a neighborhood forum and need a clean reading. CIV-ORD/Φ-14.8 Article 2 (Outside Employment) Paragraph 1: Hearing officers of the Civic Adjudication Bench shall not accept paid advocacy work before any municipal body during their term of appointment. Paragraph 2: Teaching up to four hours per week at a licensed academy is exempt if disclosed to the Ethics Desk. CIV-ORD/Φ-14.8 Article 3 (Reporting) Paragraph 1: Disclosures under Paragraph 2 shall be filed within fourteen days of acceptance. CIV-ORD/Φ-01.2 Article 8 (Staff Associations) Paragraph 1: Ordinary clerical staff may join voluntary staff clubs without prior approval.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 2(1) expressly bars hearing officers from paid advocacy before municipal bodies during appointment. Teaching exemption in (2) does not reopen advocacy. The claim aligns.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"OUTSIDE_ADVOCACY_BAR_CONFIRMED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-34 · 안전교육이수주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Kindly outline the required cycle for mandatory field-safety training for ward maintenance crews, and who must complete it, using only these articles. CIV-ORD/Φ-33.2 Article 7 (Field Safety Training) Paragraph 1: Every ward maintenance crew member shall complete the certified field-safety module once every twelve months. Paragraph 2: New hires shall complete the module before the first solo field assignment. CIV-ORD/Φ-33.2 Article 8 (Records) Paragraph 1: Completion certificates shall be stored by the Training Desk for four years. CIV-ORD/Φ-15.0 Article 3 (Toolbox Talks) Paragraph 1: Daily toolbox talks do not substitute for the certified module.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 7(1) obliges each ward maintenance crew member to finish the certified module every twelve months. Art. 7(2) adds a pre-solo rule for new hires. Outline tracks the text.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TRAINING_CYCLE_CONFIRMED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
May I delete Lurex migration records after cutover, and if not, what is the archival sequence?
[MTR/26/093] Lurex migration records are retained in the archive bucket.
[MTR/26/094] Archive access is read-only after cutover.
[MTR/26/095] Retention duration and deletion authority are not stated.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"deletion_rule_unaddressed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
May a Dema customer-supplied ID copy alone unlock a profile?
[MTR/26/079] Dema profile unlock requires a registry match and internal verifier sign-off.
[MTR/26/080] Customer-supplied copies may support intake, but an unverified copy alone is low-trust and cannot unlock access.
[MTR/26/081] Registry mismatch sends the case to manual hold.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"low_trust_identity_copy"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-37 · 언론인터뷰금지범위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] May field inspectors give live broadcast interviews about active enforcement cases without media-office clearance? A neighborhood broadcaster is pressing for a yes-or-no based on code. CIV-ORD/Φ-97.5 Article 2 (Media Coordination) Paragraph 1: The Media Relations Office coordinates scheduled press briefings on adopted policies. Paragraph 2: Staff shall route written press inquiries on adopted policies to that Office within one working day. CIV-ORD/Φ-97.5 Article 3 (Branding) Paragraph 1: Official logos on media materials require brand-desk approval. CIV-ORD/Φ-48.2 Article 5 (Field Uniforms) Paragraph 1: Inspectors shall wear issued uniforms during field duty.

[Assistant] <think>The clauses cover policy briefings, written inquiry routing, branding, and uniforms. They never state rules on live interviews about active enforcement. The issue is not addressed.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"INTERVIEW_SCOPE_NOT_COVERED"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-38 · 안정성인증 갱신주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Never dealt with certification paperwork before, so — does the stability certificate need to be renewed every 24 months to stay valid? Excerpt below.

PSS26·083
Stability Test Certificate:
Issued upon completion of the 24-month long-term study
Lists the tested batch's expiry-supported shelf life

[Assistant] <think>Doc only covers initial issuance "upon completion" of the study. It never mentions a 24-month renewal cycle.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"RENEWAL_CADENCE_NOT_COVERED"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-39 · 향료 배합 상한선

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
New to formulation lingo, so bear with me: is the fragrance percentage limit the same for Velbrisk's night cream and its foaming cleanser, since they're from the same brand line? Doc below.

PSS26·029
Product A: Velbrisk Night Cream (leave-on) — fragrance cap 0.3%
Product B: Velbrisk Foaming Cleanser (rinse-off) — fragrance cap 0.8%
Caps set per exposure category per internal fragrance safety guideline
Reviewed by: Formulation Safety Team

[Assistant] <think>Night cream cap "0.3%" vs cleanser cap "0.8%" — different product types, caps aren't shared across the line.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"CAP_DIFFERS_BY_PRODUCT_TYPE"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-40 · 유화공정 순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Not sure how cosmetics manufacturing actually works, but does the preservative go into the batch while it's still hot, or only once everything has cooled down? Steps pasted below.

PSS26·033
Face Cream Manufacturing Steps:
1. Heat oil phase to 75°C
2. Heat water phase to 75°C
3. Combine phases under agitation
4. Cool batch to 40°C
5. Add preservative and fragrance

[Assistant] <think>Step 5 lists preservative as added only "after cooling to 40°C." So it's never mixed in while hot.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PRESERVATIVE_ADDED_AFTER_COOLING"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-41 · 심사위원 배정우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Our incoming editorial assistant assumed that reviewer assignment is strictly mechanical — cases go out purely by expertise-match score under Annex D, no exceptions, ever. Wanted to check that against the operation statute before she starts routing cases.

[Wonju Consortium of Learned Societies — Editorial Board Operation Statute 24-III-e]
Article 8 (Reviewer Assignment Priority)
Paragraph 1. Cases shall be queued for reviewer assignment in order of expertise-match score computed under Annex D.
Paragraph 2. Notwithstanding Paragraph 1, the Editor-in-Chief may, at sole discretion, redirect any case to a Senior Advisory Reviewer ahead of the queue; such redirection is final and not subject to appeal.

[Annex D — Expertise-Match Scoring Formula]
Score = (keyword overlap x 0.6) + (prior citation count x 0.4), normalized to a 100-point scale.

[Assistant] <think>Claim allows no exceptions, but Article 8 Paragraph 2 gives the Editor-in-Chief a final, unappealable override.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"editor_override_ignored"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-42 · 유출통보기한시간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Our privacy clinic was told the Privacy Duty Lead must notify the City Data Guardian within forty-eight hours of confirming a personal-data breach. Is that hour count accurate? CIV-ORD/Φ-78.4 Article 5 (Breach Notification Internal) Paragraph 1: Upon confirmation of a personal-data breach, the Privacy Duty Lead shall notify the City Data Guardian within twenty-four hours. Paragraph 2: The notice shall describe categories of data and approximate number of subjects affected if known. CIV-ORD/Φ-78.4 Article 6 (Containment Log) Paragraph 1: Containment steps shall be logged hourly until the incident is closed. CIV-ORD/Φ-25.8 Article 3 (Public Statements) Paragraph 1: Public statements on breaches require Guardian clearance.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 5(1) requires notice to the City Data Guardian within twenty-four hours after confirmation. Forty-eight hours doubles the window and distorts the number.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"BREACH_NOTICE_HOURS_DOUBLED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-43 · 자본지출승인권자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Please put together a short summary of who may approve capital outlays above the local threshold, based only on the attached clauses. Our consortium is bidding on a municipal interface and must name the correct signer. CIV-ORD/Φ-03.4 Article 6 (Capital Expenditure Authority) Paragraph 1: Capital outlays exceeding 80,000 lumen-credits require written approval by the Finance Controller. Paragraph 2: Outlays at or below that amount may be approved by the Division Head. CIV-ORD/Φ-03.4 Article 7 (Reporting) Paragraph 1: Approved capital outlays shall be logged in the ledger within three working days. CIV-ORD/Φ-19.0 Article 2 (Procurement Notices) Paragraph 1: Public notices for goods above 20,000 lumen-credits shall run for ten calendar days.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 6(1) places approval of capital outlays over 80,000 lumen-credits solely with the Finance Controller. Art. 6(2) covers only amounts at or below that line. The summary claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"APPROVER_MATCHES_ART6"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-44 · 보존문서열람창구

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Please summarize for a civic archive visitors’ leaflet which office grants on-site reading of closed cold-archive files and during which hours, per the rules only. CIV-ORD/Φ-55.3 Article 11 (Cold Archive Access) Paragraph 1: On-site reading of closed cold-archive files is granted solely by the Archive Access Office. Paragraph 2: Reading rooms operate on working days from 09:30 to 16:00, with the last admission at 15:30. CIV-ORD/Φ-55.3 Article 12 (Copying) Paragraph 1: Digital copies require a separate order under Form C-9. CIV-ORD/Φ-10.8 Article 4 (Building Security) Paragraph 1: Visitors must present photo identification at Gate B.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 11(1) vests grant authority only in the Archive Access Office. Art. 11(2) fixes reading hours 09:30–16:00, last admission 15:30. Leaflet summary is supported.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ARCHIVE_ACCESS_SUMMARY_OK"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Quick figure check: what haircut applies to Zerin pledge notes?
[MTR/26/044] Zerin pledge notes valued at 72% of face for margin.
[MTR/26/045] Applies to notes with tenor at or below 19 months; older paper uses a separate schedule.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"haircut_rate_explicit"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Release order for Talen collateral after full repayment? Need exact sequence.
[MTR/26/064] Talen repayment is marked complete by settlement desk.
[MTR/26/065] Client notice follows the mark.
[MTR/26/066] Control desk removes the lien after notice.
[MTR/26/067] Custody desk sends the release receipt last.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"release_sequence_explicit"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Should a Quivra notice landing on a non-listed holiday receive a 3-day extension from this rule?
[MTR/26/082] Quivra notices are due within 3 calendar days of issuance.
[MTR/26/083] The rule lists no holiday extension; an unsupported extension cannot pass verification.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"holiday_extension_absent"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Should the Ralvo risk score be used as the first and only sign-off step?
[MTR/26/084] Ralvo score is a triage input.
[MTR/26/085] It is not independently validated for final decisions; analyst review and control sign-off are required.
[MTR/26/086] Sequence: score, analyst review, control sign-off.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"unvalidated_score_not_sufficient"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-49 · 데이터재사용 승인우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Someone on the partner-institution side told me that external non-member institutions get bumped ahead of the regular queue once they pay the data access fee — can you check that against our governance code? Three documents attached.

[Cheongam Research Data Center — Data Reuse Governance Code 24-IV-b]
Article 9 (Reuse Request Priority)
Paragraph 1. Reuse requests shall be ranked solely by the following criteria, in order:
  Item 1. The risk tier of the requesting project as classified under Annex B.
  Item 2. Request timestamp within the same risk tier.
Paragraph 2. No other factor shall affect ranking order.

[Annex B — Risk Tier Classification Table]
Tier 1 (Low): anonymized aggregate datasets only.
Tier 2 (Medium): pseudonymized individual-level datasets.
Tier 3 (High): datasets containing re-identifiable fields under special review.

[Fee Schedule Notice — Data Reuse Program]
External non-member institutions are charged a data access fee of 450,000 units per approved dataset, payable within 30 days of approval.

[Assistant] <think>Article 9 Paragraph 2 excludes all factors besides risk tier and timestamp; the Fee Notice never ties payment to queue position.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"fee_based_priority_not_in_closed_list"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-50 · 외부선물가액한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Someone told our trade group that municipal staff may keep unsolicited gifts worth up to 100 lumen-credits from a single source per calendar year. Please verify that figure. CIV-ORD/Φ-44.7 Article 3 (Gift Acceptance Limits) Paragraph 1: An employee may accept unsolicited gifts from a single outside source only when the aggregate fair market value in a calendar year does not exceed 40 lumen-credits. Paragraph 2: Cash and cash equivalents are prohibited in any amount. CIV-ORD/Φ-44.7 Article 4 (Reporting) Paragraph 1: Gifts at or above 25 lumen-credits shall be reported to the Ethics Desk within seven days. CIV-ORD/Φ-21.1 Article 5 (Protocol Events) Paragraph 1: Tokens distributed equally at open protocol events are governed by separate protocol rules.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 3(1) caps aggregate unsolicited gifts from one source at 40 lumen-credits per year. The 100 figure inflates that limit and is a numeric distortion.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"GIFT_CAP_INFLATED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Suppose a Dovra wire exceeds the review band. What is the required approval order?
[MTR/26/041] High-value Dovra wires: analyst logs case, control officer checks sanctions, treasury lead releases. No skip.
[MTR/26/042] Routine wires use analyst check then treasury release; high-value band is 480,000 luma.
[MTR/26/043] Exception memo may explain delay, not reorder sign-offs.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"approval_sequence_explicit"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-52 · 세럼 개봉후 유효기간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Total beauty-industry newbie here — quick question: my roommate said this serum should get tossed out 12 months after you crack the seal open, not 12 months after it was manufactured. Trying to verify before I toss my stuff. Pasting the spec sheet below.

PSS26·014
Product: Aurelune Brightening Serum
Volume: 30mL
PAO (Period After Opening): 12M, store below 25°C
Count starts from the moment the seal is broken, independent of manufacture date
QC Owner: Quality Assurance Team

[Assistant] <think>Spec says PAO "12M" counts from opening. That matches the roommate's claim exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PAO_COUNTS_FROM_OPENING"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-53 · 색소변경 승인권자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Trying to figure out the approval chain here — between the R&D lead and the QA head, is the QA head the one who gives final approval when swapping out a colorant? Relevant section below.

PSS26·041
Color Additive Substitution Procedure:
Requires review by Formulation R&D
Documentation update logged by QA Coordinator

[Assistant] <think>Doc only lists "review by R&D" and QA "documentation" logging — no mention of who holds final approval.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"APPROVER_NOT_SPECIFIED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-54 · 주차허가취소사유

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Under what conditions may the Facility Mobility Office revoke a staff parking permit, and who issues the revocation notice? Please answer from the clauses alone. CIV-ORD/Φ-82.6 Article 9 (Permit Revocation) Paragraph 1: The Facility Mobility Office may revoke a staff parking permit when the holder records three unpaid violation notices within six months, or when the vehicle is used to block an emergency lane. Paragraph 2: Revocation notices shall be issued by the Facility Mobility Office and take effect on the third working day after delivery. CIV-ORD/Φ-82.6 Article 10 (Appeal of Revocation) Paragraph 1: Appeals lie to the Transport Review Desk within ten days. CIV-ORD/Φ-17.3 Article 1 (Lot Maps) Paragraph 1: Lot maps are posted at each entrance.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 9(1) lists two triggers: three unpaid violations in six months, or blocking an emergency lane. Art. 9(2) has the Facility Mobility Office issue the notice. Reading matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"REVOCATION_GROUNDS_MATCH"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-55 · 심의위원정원요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] We received a claim that the Riverfront Design Council is validly seated when only five voting members are present. Please test that number against the code fragments below. CIV-ORD/Φ-27.0 Article 4 (Composition and Quorum) Paragraph 1: The Riverfront Design Council consists of nine voting members appointed by the Council Chair. Paragraph 2: A quorum requires the presence of at least seven voting members. Paragraph 3: Advisory specialists may attend but do not count toward quorum. CIV-ORD/Φ-27.0 Article 5 (Voting) Paragraph 1: Decisions require a majority of members present, provided quorum exists. CIV-ORD/Φ-02.9 Article 11 (Public Notice of Meetings) Paragraph 1: Meeting notices shall be posted three calendar days in advance.

[Assistant] <think>Art. 4(2) sets quorum at seven voting members, not five. Five present fails the numeric quorum rule. Specialists under (3) do not fill the gap.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"QUORUM_COUNT_UNDERSTATED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50006-56 · 고충신청제출기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] What does the code say about the filing deadline for a staff grievance after a written reprimand? A former contractor is asking me for the day count. CIV-ORD/Φ-18.6 Article 3 (Grievance Intake) Paragraph 1: The Personnel Ombud Office shall accept written grievances alleging unfair discipline. Paragraph 2: Intake staff shall issue a case number within two working days of receipt. CIV-ORD/Φ-18.6 Article 4 (Hearing Calendar) Paragraph 1: Once numbered, a grievance shall be set for a conference within thirty calendar days. CIV-ORD/Φ-07.2 Article 12 (Reprimand Form) Paragraph 1: Written reprimands shall cite the rule alleged to have been breached.

[Assistant] <think>The excerpts cover intake, case numbering, and conference timing after filing, but never state how many days after a reprimand a grievance must be filed. The deadline question is outside the evidence.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"FILING_WINDOW_NOT_IN_EVIDENCE"}


학술·연구/논문/w50006-57 · 연구비카드 집행한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
What's the process if a purchase on the research expense card goes over the single-transaction cap? I've been telling people that approval from the Fund Office Director has to be requested at least three business days before the purchase using Form RF-9, and that even with that approval you're still capped at 6,000,000 units for the month — is that right?

[Baekrok Research Fund Office — Research Expense Card Regulation 25-XI-a]
Article 4 (Transaction Limits)
Paragraph 1. The single-transaction limit for the research expense card is 800,000 units.
Paragraph 2. Transactions exceeding this limit require prior written approval from the Fund Office Director, submitted at least three business days in advance via Form RF-9.
Paragraph 3. The monthly cumulative limit is 6,000,000 units regardless of any individual transaction approvals granted under Paragraph 2.

[Form RF-9 — Prior Approval Request Template]
Fields: requester name, project code, estimated amount, business justification, requested approval date.

[Card Issuance FAQ]
Q: How long does a replacement card take? A: Five business days after the loss report is filed.

[Assistant] <think>Claim matches Article 4 Paragraphs 2-3 exactly: prior approval three days ahead via RF-9, monthly cap still applies regardless.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"expense_limits_confirmed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
When a Veyra review opens on 12 Frostfall 2026, when is the next review due?
[MTR/26/058] Veyra periodic review starts on the opening date; next check due 45 calendar days later.
[MTR/26/059] Opening date: 12 Frostfall 2026, recorded at 09:10.
[MTR/26/060] Cycle is calendar-day based, not business-day based.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"cadence_anchor_explicit"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Where a Sava account is dormant but a court hold exists, which exception steps apply and in what order?
[MTR/26/049] Dormant Sava accounts normally need branch manager and risk desk release.
[MTR/26/050] A court hold overrides the dormant shortcut: legal desk records hold, risk desk confirms, branch manager remains last signer.
[MTR/26/051] Hold code Cinder-8 is the trigger.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"exception_sequence_explicit"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Which queue gets first handling when a Ruma complaint and a payment outage arrive together?
[MTR/26/061] Ruma complaints rank P2; payment outages rank P1.
[MTR/26/062] P1 is handled before P2 regardless of intake time.
[MTR/26/063] Tie within a rank uses receipt time.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"priority_rule_explicit"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
With no numeric count in the Paredo rule, can the 12-check monthly claim still pass verification?
[MTR/26/076] Paredo sampling is monthly; scope is all manual overrides.
[MTR/26/077] Supervisors record completed checks in the month-end log.
[MTR/26/078] The rule gives cadence and scope, but no numeric count; an unsupported count cannot pass.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"numeric_rule_absent"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
With only a broker attestation in hand, can the Vorsa packet be closed as fully evidenced?
[MTR/26/068] Vorsa packets need transaction log plus internal control sign-off.
[MTR/26/069] Broker attestations may be attached as context; alone they are low-trust and cannot close the case.
[MTR/26/070] Intake order: log source, obtain internal sign-off, then close.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"low_trust_attestation"}


화장품·뷰티/제품 사양서/w50006-63 · 민원처리 우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Working my first shift in customer complaints, still learning the ropes — if a contamination complaint and a packaging defect complaint come in on the same day, does the contamination one jump the queue first? Triage rules below.

PSS26·064
Complaint Intake Triage:
Contamination/foreign-object reports escalated to QA within 24h, ahead of all other categories
Packaging defect reports follow standard 5-business-day queue

[Assistant] <think>Doc: contamination reports escalated "ahead of all other categories" — confirms it outranks packaging defects.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CONTAMINATION_TAKES_PRIORITY"}


교육/위키/w50006-64 · 장학 신청 마감일

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Aid desk flyer claims the Meridian scholarship packet is due 20 Feb. I’m about to stamp late slips—check the wiki date.","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·26.09","text":"Aid office wiki: ‘Meridian scholarship packets close 5 Feb at 17:00 campus time; nothing after the portal lock is reviewed.’ Officer Quin: ‘February 20 is the interview day, not the packet deadline.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·26.12","text":"Portal changelog: ‘Hard close script set for 5 Feb.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Packet deadline is 5 Feb; 20 Feb is interview day. Treating 20 Feb as the due date distorts the documented deadline.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"DEADLINE_SWAPPED_WITH_INTERVIEW"}


물류/회의록/w50006-65 · 긴급레인우선

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Among expedited lanes on my comparison sheet, midnight cutover priority is medical kits, then live-cell packs, then spare avionics crates.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·υ41","text":"- Expedited lane priority (midnight cutover)\n- 1) medical kits 2) live-cell packs 3) spare avionics crates\n- Standard parcels after these three"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·υ42","text":"- Cafeteria menu change\n- Not related to lanes"}]}

[Assistant] <think>υ41 locks priority: medical kits, live-cell packs, then spare avionics crates.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


물류/회의록/w50006-66 · 외주검수권한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Any third-party QC crew can stamp outbound cartons for Lane Quor once they sign the visitor log.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·ω33","text":"- Outbound QC stamping Lane Quor\n- Trust rule: only crews on the Certified Vendor Ledger may stamp\n- Visitor log alone is not sufficient"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·ω34","text":"- Stamp ink colors\n- Blue standard / red rework"}]}

[Assistant] <think>ω33 limits stamping to Certified Vendor Ledger crews. Visitor log alone is insufficient. Claim ignores that trust rule.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"TRUST_CONSTRAINT_SKIPPED"}


물류/회의록/w50006-67 · 반품창고접근

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Anyone with a building badge can enter the returns cage after 18:00 to stage photos.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·δ28","text":"- Returns cage access after 18:00\n- Trust list: only staff with Returns Endorsement strip on badge\n- Generic building badge denied at turnstile"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·δ29","text":"- Photo staging tables: 4 units\n- Lighting: cold white"}]}

[Assistant] <think>δ28 admits only Returns Endorsement strip; generic badge denied. Claim skips the trust list.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"TRUST_CONSTRAINT_SKIPPED"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-68 · 크레인운전 자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Before I brief the crew, who is allowed to operate the 80-ton crawler crane on Pad R3 under the local notes?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·19·a","text":"Pad R3 crawler rules sit on one page. The 80-ton unit may be operated only by holders of a Peldra Board Type-B ticket who also wear a site green badge for the current quarter. Spotters do not substitute for either credential."},{"document_id":"현장메모·19·b","text":"Wind cut-off for that crane is recorded as 12 m/s gust; radios stay on channel 4 during lifts."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Notes require Peldra Board Type-B ticket plus current site green badge for the 80-ton crawler. Briefing can use that dual requirement as stated.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CRANE_QUAL_MATCH"}


교육/위키/w50006-69 · 교재 무상 지급 대상

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Bookstore line is chanting that free core textbooks go to the whole campus this term. Quick check against the grant wiki?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·27.01","text":"Grant office dump: ‘Free core-text vouchers apply only to first-year cohort students on the Horizon track.’ Clerk Theo: ‘Sophomores and transfers are outside this voucher pool.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·27.04","text":"Orientation mic check: ‘We said first-year Horizon only; please stop expanding the flyer language.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Vouchers are limited to first-year Horizon students. “Whole campus” stretches far past that cohort and is overgeneralization.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"VOUCHER_SCOPE_TO_ALL_CAMPUS"}


교육/위키/w50006-70 · 현장학습 동의 범위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Bus leaves in an hour. Staff claim every rider needs a parental consent slip—minors and adults. Is that what the wiki actually says?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·22.03","text":"Field office tape: ‘Parental consent slips are mandatory only for riders under 18. Adult students sign their own liability card.’ Lead Kai: ‘Do not demand parent forms from twenty-year-olds.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·22.07","text":"Parent hotline note: ‘We stopped collecting adult parent forms after the spring audit.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Evidence limits parental slips to under-18 riders; adults use their own card. Claiming every rider needs a parent slip overgeneralizes that rule.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"CONSENT_EXTENDED_TO_ALL_AGES"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-71 · 화기감시 지속시간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Can you verify that a two-hour fire watch is required after hot work on the roof membrane?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·16·a","text":"Roof membrane hot-work packages list permit numbers, extinguisher locations at each stair head, and the name of the fire watcher on duty during the cut. Duration of post-work fire watch is not written in these pages."},{"document_id":"현장메모·16·b","text":"Spark screens must cover open edges while cutting, and the membrane vendor’s patch kit stays on the roof cart."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Docs cover permits, extinguishers, and watcher names during cuts, but never state any post-work fire-watch length. Duration cannot be judged from given evidence.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_WATCH_DURATION_TEXT"}


물류/회의록/w50006-72 · 슬롯변경승인자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Comparing Hub A vs Hub B for same-day cross-dock slot swaps, only the Yard Lead can green-light the change.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·λ12","text":"- Cross-dock slot change\n- Same-day swap approver: Yard Lead only\n- Shift supervisors may propose, not approve\n- Effective after roll-call 06:00"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·λ13","text":"- Hub B staffing roster\n- Breaks: 10:00 / 15:00\n- No approval matrix"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·λ14","text":"- Radio channel map\n- Ch-3 yard / Ch-5 security"}]}

[Assistant] <think>λ12 names Yard Lead as sole same-day swap approver; supervisors only propose.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-73 · 외부기둥 피복두께

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Confirm if 20 mm is the minimum concrete cover on exterior columns of Hall Q as claimed in the draft slide.","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·09·a","text":"Hall Q exterior columns: minimum concrete cover is 40 mm on all weather faces. Interior faces of the same columns may use 30 mm, but the outdoor exposure face never drops below 40 mm."},{"document_id":"현장메모·09·b","text":"Cover chairs are stocked in blue bins near the Hall Q form yard; pink bins are for slab chairs only."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Slide claims 20 mm exterior cover; 09·a requires 40 mm on weather faces. Same cover metric, wrong value—numeric distortion.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"COVER_20_VS_40"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-74 · 3단비계 화기금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Confirm whether open-flame cutting is banned on the third-tier scaffold deck unless a signed hot-work slip is posted at the ladder base.","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·11·a","text":"Yesterday I walked Tower South with the shift lead. On any scaffold deck labeled third-tier or higher, open-flame cutting and grinding are banned unless a signed hot-work slip is taped at the ladder base before work starts. The slip must name the fire watcher and the extinguisher tag number."},{"document_id":"현장메모·11·b","text":"The same note set lists glove brands preferred for rebar tying and reminds crews that lunch boxes stay off the edge rails. No other hot-work rules appear on that page."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc 11·a bans open-flame cutting on third-tier decks without a signed hot-work slip at the ladder base. The claim matches that ban and condition. No numeric conflict.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"HOTWORK_BAN_MATCH"}


물류/회의록/w50006-75 · 지게차자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Does operating the indoor electric forklift in Zone K require the amber badge plus a same-week ride-check?","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·φ19","text":"- Zone K equipment access\n- Indoor electric forklift: amber badge AND same-week ride-check required\n- Outdoor diesel units: amber badge only"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·φ20","text":"- Locker assignment sheet\n- Rows A–D"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·φ21","text":"- Visitor parking map\n- Lot C overflow"}]}

[Assistant] <think>φ19 requires amber badge and same-week ride-check for indoor electric forklift in Zone K. Both requirements present.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-76 · 도면충돌 우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Does the memo say structural drawings outrank architectural ones when column sizes conflict on Block D?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·27·a","text":"Block D coordination note: when column sizes differ between packages, structural drawings supersede architectural drawings. The site engineer records the conflict on form CF-DIFF and issues a one-page instruction the same day."},{"document_id":"현장메모·27·b","text":"MEP clashes on Block D use a separate priority list led by the services coordinator and do not alter the structural-over-architectural rule."}]}

[Assistant] <think>27·a states structural drawings supersede architectural ones on Block D column-size conflicts. The priority claim is directly supported.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DRAWING_PRIORITY_OK"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-77 · 에폭시 상층보관금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"For a safety board update, mark whether epoxy hardener drums may be staged above the second floor of Tower North.","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·31·a","text":"Tower North chemical storage: epoxy hardener drums are prohibited above Level 2. Allowed staging is only the ground cage and the Level-2 open bay with secondary containment trays."},{"document_id":"현장메모·31·b","text":"Resin base components follow the same floor limit; empty pails still count as staged material until bagged for disposal."},{"document_id":"현장메모·31·c","text":"Fire extinguisher checks on Tower North stairs are weekly and listed on a separate board."},{"document_id":"현장메모·31·d","text":"Delivery drivers unload at Dock N and wait for the storekeeper before any vertical hoist."}]}

[Assistant] <think>31·a prohibits epoxy hardener drums above Level 2 on Tower North. Staging above the second floor is not allowed; board text can say banned.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"STORAGE_BAN_SUPPORTED"}


물류/회의록/w50006-78 · 보세입고순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"For bonded inbound at Depot Rhel, cargo may leave the cage only after seal photo, customs hold-release, weight ticket, then cage exit scan.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·χ02","text":"- Bonded inbound Depot Rhel\n- Order: 1 seal photo 2 customs hold-release 3 weight ticket 4 cage exit scan\n- Skipping any step voids the release"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·χ03","text":"- Overtime pool rules\n- Cap 6 hours/week"}]}

[Assistant] <think>χ02 freezes that four-step order. Skipping voids release. Sequence claim is supported.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-79 · 굴착전 펜스의무

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"For my subcontractor briefing, can I state that temporary perimeter fencing is optional before trench work on Line K?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·21·a","text":"Line K trench protocol: temporary perimeter fencing must be installed and tagged before any excavation tool breaks ground. Optional signage is allowed in addition, but fencing itself is mandatory."},{"document_id":"현장메모·21·b","text":"Spoil piles stay at least 1 m from the fence line, and night reflective strips are added when work spans dusk."},{"document_id":"현장메모·21·c","text":"Ladder landings inside the fence use the yellow clip system listed in the toolbox kit."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Briefing would call fencing optional; 21·a makes temporary perimeter fencing mandatory before any trench break. Optional vs mandatory is claim mismatch.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"FENCE_OPTIONAL_VS_MANDATORY"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-80 · 거푸집 해체기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Help me state the formwork strip timing for Grade-M beams on Level 5 so the schedule board stays accurate.","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·03·a","text":"Level 5 Grade-M beams keep side forms for 14 calendar days after pour before strip is allowed. Early strip needs a written strength test above the M-class threshold, which is rare on this floor."},{"document_id":"현장메모·03·b","text":"Slab soffits on Level 5 follow a different chart and are not covered by the Grade-M beam rule."},{"document_id":"현장메모·03·c","text":"Scaffold towers used for strip access are booked two days ahead through the yard desk."}]}

[Assistant] <think>03·a sets 14 calendar days after pour before stripping Grade-M beam side forms on Level 5. That timing is the schedule figure.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"STRIP_TIMING_MATCH"}


교육/위키/w50006-81 · 기숙 대기 우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Housing office is slammed. Remind me which waitlist groups outrank general applicants when beds free up mid-term.","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·16.20","text":"Housing desk transcript: ‘Mid-term frees: first call goes to students with documented accessibility needs, then to active RA substitutes, then to the general waitlist by application timestamp.’ Manager Eli: ‘Greek houses and clubs have no separate jump.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·16.25","text":"RA lounge board: ‘We are tier two, not tier one—accessibility packets still clear first.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Priority order is accessibility, then RA substitutes, then general timestamp. Claim restating that stack matches the desk transcript.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"WAITLIST_PRIORITY_STACK_OK"}


교육/위키/w50006-82 · 면담시간 게시 주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"How often must faculty refresh the posted office-hour grid on the department wiki wall?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·14.28","text":"Department ops record: ‘Office-hour grids must be reposted at the start of each biweekly cycle; mid-cycle changes need a red sticky the same day.’ Admin Lora: ‘Monthly is too slow under the new handbook.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·14.31","text":"Faculty lounge chatter: ‘Biweekly means every two weeks from term open, not whenever we feel like it.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Ops record requires a biweekly repost of office-hour grids. A claim that states that cycle is backed by the handbook note.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"BIWEEKLY_POSTING_CYCLE"}


물류/회의록/w50006-83 · 수출라벨승인

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I can print export ship labels myself if the template matches the sample in the binder.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·β44","text":"- Export ship labels\n- Trust gate: Compliance Desk must countersign each batch before print\n- Template match alone does not authorize print"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·β45","text":"- Binder location: shelf N-2\n- Sample revision R7"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·β46","text":"- Printer queue names\n- EXP-A / EXP-B"}]}

[Assistant] <think>β44 requires Compliance Desk countersign; template match alone does not authorize print.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"TRUST_CONSTRAINT_SKIPPED"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-84 · 레미콘 반입온도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I need material for a toolbox talk on ready-mix intake at Gate B—what maximum delivery temperature does the local note set for truck discharge?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·04·c","text":"Gate B intake rules were rewritten after last month’s reject event. Ready-mix trucks may discharge only when the drum probe reads 28°C or lower. Above that, the batch is turned away and logged under code R-28."},{"document_id":"현장메모·04·d","text":"Slump targets for interior slabs remain 150 mm plus or minus 20 mm, and the lab still samples every third truck. Temperature is controlled separately under the Gate B rule."},{"document_id":"현장메모·04·e","text":"Drivers park on the painted bay, hand the ticket to the checker, and wait for the probe reading before chute swing."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Gate B note sets discharge only at 28°C or lower. That is the max delivery temperature for the talk. Supporting detail is explicit in 04·c.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TEMP_LIMIT_SUPPORTED"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-85 · 토질시험 비용주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I need to explain who funds the third-party soil compaction tests on Lot 12—do the notes assign that cost?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·28·a","text":"Lot 12 compaction testing is done by Nulric Lab on a every-lift schedule for fill deeper than 300 mm. Sample tickets list layer thickness and moisture, not payment responsibility."},{"document_id":"현장메모·28·b","text":"Failed lifts are reworked and retested the next morning; the retest method mirrors the original probe pattern."},{"document_id":"현장메모·28·c","text":"Lab vans park outside Gate 2 and radio the fill foreman before boring."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Evidence describes lab, frequency, and retest method only. No sentence assigns who pays for third-party tests, so cost responsibility cannot be verified.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"COST_OWNER_ABSENT"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-86 · 굴착승인 책임주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I plan to tell visitors that the site manager alone can green-light deep excavation beyond 3 m—does the memo support that statement?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·25·a","text":"Deep excavation past 3 m on this site needs written authorization from the regional geotech engineer assigned by Veldra Geo Desk. The site manager may request the dig but cannot approve it."},{"document_id":"현장메모·25·b","text":"Utility clearances still come from the city dig ticket office and are attached to the same package before machines move."},{"document_id":"현장메모·25·c","text":"Spoil haul routes for deep digs are marked on map sheet DG-3."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Claim gives sole approval to the site manager; evidence assigns authorization to the regional geotech engineer. Actor mismatch—claim mismatch.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"DIG_APPROVER_WRONG"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-87 · 데크 양생시간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I'm preparing a handout: someone wrote that Wing A deck curing must run only 48 hours before foot traffic is allowed—should I keep that line?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·12·a","text":"Wing A composite deck note: no foot traffic until 72 hours of continuous curing after the last pour pour-stop. The 48-hour mark is only for light equipment staging on adjacent completed bays, not for walking the fresh deck."},{"document_id":"현장메모·12·b","text":"Cure blankets stay sealed at edges; water spray is twice daily in dry weather."},{"document_id":"현장메모·12·c","text":"Rebar delivery for Wing B uses the same access road but does not change Wing A cure timing."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Handout says 48 hours before foot traffic; evidence requires 72 hours of curing first. 48 hours applies to other staging, not this claim—numeric distortion.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"CURE_48_VS_72"}


물류/회의록/w50006-88 · 주말픽업주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"If the weekend-pickup plan wins my comparison, the SLA clock resets every Sunday 22:00 local.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·σ55","text":"- Weekend pickup SLA\n- Reset cycle: every Sunday 22:00 local\n- Missed pickup rolls to next cycle, not mid-week"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·σ56","text":"- Driver meal stipend\n- 12 units per shift"}]}

[Assistant] <think>σ55 states reset every Sunday 22:00 local. Misses roll to next cycle. Supports the reset-cycle claim.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


교육/위키/w50006-89 · 복수학위 성적기준

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"International dual-degree applicants keep asking for the minimum GPA. Do these domestic-track pages set that bar?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·29.40","text":"Domestic dual-degree FAQ: ‘Home-campus dual majors need a 2.8 cumulative GPA to stay in the combined plan.’ Advisor Kim: ‘This page never mentions partner-campus international routes.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·29.44","text":"Registrar sticky: ‘International dual-degree tables live on a different wiki space still under draft.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·29.48","text":"Study-abroad lounge note: ‘We only have language-score tips here, not GPA floors for dual awards.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·29.51","text":"Committee minutes scrap: ‘International dual GPA deferred to spring policy vote.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Pages give a 2.8 rule for domestic dual majors and state international tables are elsewhere or deferred. No basis to set the international GPA bar.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"INTL_DUAL_GPA_ABSENT"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-90 · 우천용접 금지여부

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Is it accurate to say stick welding may continue in light rain on the east gantry if the operator wears insulated gloves?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·14·a","text":"East gantry welding note: stick welding is prohibited in any measurable rain or standing water on the work deck. Insulated gloves are required in dry conditions only and do not create a wet-weather exception."},{"document_id":"현장메모·14·b","text":"Tents may be erected for grinding, but electrode work still waits until surfaces are dry and the rain has stopped for at least thirty minutes."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Claim allows light-rain stick welding with gloves; notes ban stick welding in any rain and deny a glove exception. Direct prohibition clash—claim mismatch.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"WET_WELD_ALLOWED_VS_BAN"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-91 · 공구상자회의 주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Is it correct that Mirae Shift Lead Joon alone owns the 07:30 toolbox attendance log for Pad R3?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·08·b","text":"Pad R3 morning routine: Mirae Shift Lead Joon is the sole owner of the 07:30 toolbox attendance log. Deputies may collect signatures only when Joon is off site and only after Joon’s written handoff is pinned on the board."},{"document_id":"현장메모·08·c","text":"The same folder holds emergency muster maps and a list of first-aid kit locations near the crane path."},{"document_id":"현장메모·08·d","text":"Visitors sign a separate guest sheet at the gate; that sheet is not the toolbox log."}]}

[Assistant] <think>08·b names Joon as sole owner of the 07:30 toolbox log, with deputy use only under written handoff. The ownership claim is supported.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"OWNERSHIP_MATCH"}


교육/위키/w50006-92 · 선택과목 패논패

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Is it true every elective may be taken pass/fail this year? Curriculum committee keeps getting that rumor.","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·33.03","text":"Curriculum wiki: ‘Pass/fail electives are limited to the River Arts minor pathway; other programs keep letter grades for electives.’ Chair Vee: ‘Do not advertise campus-wide P/F.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·33.07","text":"Advising huddle: ‘River Arts only—STEM and language tracks never opted in.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>P/F electives are confined to River Arts minor. “Every elective” expands far beyond that pathway—overgeneralization.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"PF_SCOPE_ALL_ELECTIVES"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-93 · 가설발판 하중한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Is the claim right that the temporary works platform on Grid E carries an 8-ton distributed load limit?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·06·a","text":"Grid E temporary works platform was re-rated last week. The posted distributed load limit is 5 tons total, painted on both access gates. Exceeding that figure requires a temporary works engineer sign-off that we do not currently hold."},{"document_id":"현장메모·06·b","text":"Handrail height on Grid E is 1.1 m and toe boards are mandatory on the outer edge."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Claim states 8 tons; 06·a posts a 5-ton distributed limit. Same metric, wrong number—numeric distortion.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"LOAD_LIMIT_8_VS_5"}


교육/위키/w50006-94 · 피어튜터 학점요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I’m hiring peer tutors at the learning commons—what GPA floor does the wiki set for eligibility?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·31.10","text":"Learning commons log: ‘Peer tutors must hold a cumulative GPA of 3.2 or higher and have earned a B+ or better in the tutored course.’ Lead Sam: ‘3.0 is not enough anymore after the spring revision.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·31.13","text":"HR shadow note: ‘We rejected two 3.1 applicants last week under the 3.2 line.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>UW·E·31.10 sets cumulative GPA at 3.2 plus B+ in the course. A claim stating that 3.2 floor aligns with the evidence.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"GPA_FLOOR_3_2_MATCH"}


물류/회의록/w50006-95 · 위험물혼적금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Looking at the minutes while choosing shared-trailer setups, co-loading Class M-oxide with food-grade totes is banned.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·ρ21","text":"- Hazmat co-load review\n- Prohibited: Class M-oxide with food-grade totes on same trailer\n- Allowed: Class M-oxide with empty metal drums if sealed"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·ρ22","text":"- PPE checklist for dock\n- Gloves, goggles, boots"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·ρ23","text":"- Spill kit inventory\n- Absorbents: 12 bags"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·ρ24","text":"- Training calendar\n- Hazmat refresh every Q2"}]}

[Assistant] <think>ρ21 explicitly prohibits Class M-oxide with food-grade totes on the same trailer.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


교육/위키/w50006-96 · 교원 소방훈련 면제

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"May faculty skip the building fire drill if they are mid-office-hour? Need a call before the alarm.","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·08.17","text":"Student life wiki: ‘Enrolled students must evacuate on every scheduled drill; medical exemptions route through health services.’ RA voice: ‘This page is student-facing only.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·08.20","text":"Residence chat: ‘We have nothing here about professors or office-hour holds.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·08.23","text":"Safety poster transcription: ‘Drill times for residential towers; academic wings are covered under a separate facilities memo not pasted on this wiki.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>All three docs speak to students or residential towers; faculty office-hour drill duties are absent. Cannot rule skip permission from this set.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"FACULTY_DRILL_NOT_COVERED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Need the termination notice window for a 3PL slotting contract with vendor Orphe before I shortlist them.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·θ05","text":"- Vendor Orphe onboarding\n- Kickoff checklist: system ID, ASN test, first ASN window\n- No termination clause"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·θ06","text":"- Slotting training dates\n- Week-1 shadow only"}]}

[Assistant] <think>θ05–θ06 only cover Orphe onboarding and training, not termination notice days.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_SCOPE_GAP"}


교육/위키/w50006-98 · 도서관 연장 개시일

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Night staff keep saying extended library hours start 1 Dec. I’m posting the door card—verify the start date.","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·04.55","text":"Library ops wiki: ‘Extended study hours begin 15 Dec and run through exam week.’ Desk lead Hoa: ‘December 1 is still normal closing; do not post early.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·04.58","text":"Facilities ticket: ‘Extra HVAC booked from 15 Dec only.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·04.61","text":"Student blog clip: ‘Rumor mill said Dec 1; library corrected us in the comments.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Evidence starts extended hours on 15 Dec, not 1 Dec. The circulating start date distorts the documented schedule.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"EXTENDED_HOURS_START_MISSTATED"}


물류/회의록/w50006-99 · 허브체류한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"On my hub-stop shortlist, demurrage flags after 18 hours of trailer dwell from gate-in scan.","documents":[{"document_id":"μMT·L24·π03","text":"| Item | Rule |\n| Hub dwell max | 18 hours |\n| Flag type | demurrage |\n| Clock start | gate-in scan |"},{"document_id":"μMT·L24·π04","text":"- Parking lot resurfacing notes\n- Cone layout only"}]}

[Assistant] <think>π03 table: hub dwell max 18 hours, demurrage flag, clock from gate-in. Matches the dwell claim.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_MATCH"}


교육/위키/w50006-100 · 상담실 녹음 금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Parent wants to record the counseling suite session on a phone. Is recording banned in that suite per the floor wiki?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·12.06","text":"Counseling suite board: ‘No audio or video recording devices inside Rooms C1–C4 without a written privacy waiver from both parties and the director.’ Counselor Pia: ‘Phones stay in the locker outside.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·12.08","text":"Front desk script: ‘If they ask to tape, refuse unless the waiver packet is complete.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·12.12","text":"Student voice forum: ‘Lecture halls allow personal notes; the suite rule is stricter and separate.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Suite policy bars recording in C1–C4 without a dual-party director waiver. A bare phone record request is prohibited under that text.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SUITE_RECORDING_BAN_HIT"}


교육/위키/w50006-101 · 중간고사 창 날짜

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Proctor desk is printing room signs. Claim circulating: midterm window runs 3–7 Nov. Confirm against the wiki notes.","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·03.21","text":"Exam board chat dump: ‘Midterm window opens 10 Nov and closes 14 Nov; no early slots before the 10th.’ Proctor Sana: ‘We already locked rooms for that span.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·03.22","text":"Hall monitor: ‘Someone taped 3–7 Nov on a door; that was last year’s scrap. Pull it.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Evidence sets midterms as 10–14 Nov. The claim’s 3–7 Nov window distorts those dates; hall note even flags 3–7 as last year’s scrap.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"MIDTERM_WINDOW_SHIFTED_TO_3_7"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Registrar queue is long—what is the hard ceiling on credits a student may transfer from the summer intensive block?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·11.02","text":"Transfer desk log: ‘Summer intensive credits: maximum six semester hours may land on the home transcript.’ Clerk Ryo: ‘That’s six, not nine; the winter short course is a separate rule.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·11.05","text":"Counselor pad: ‘Parents kept asking for nine; I pointed them back to the six-hour line in the intensive block FAQ.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·11.08","text":"Wiki talk: ‘Intensive block ≠ full summer term; full summer still uses the twelve-hour home-load cap.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>UW·E·11.02 states a six-hour ceiling for summer intensive transfer. The claim’s number tracks that line. Clerk clarifies winter is separate.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NUMERIC_CAP_SIX_HOURS"}


교육/위키/w50006-103 · 실험실 인증 갱신일

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Safety board says lab access cards renew on 1 Mar each year. I’m locking the cabinet tonight—does the wiki back that date?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·05.30","text":"Lab safety wiki: ‘Access-card safety certs renew every 1 September; March is only the drill month.’ Tech Rae: ‘If someone says March renewal, they’re mixing drill calendar with cert calendar.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·05.33","text":"Building ops: ‘September batch print is already on the vendor contract.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Docs place cert renewal on 1 September and call March the drill month only. Claiming 1 Mar renewal distorts the documented date.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"RENEWAL_MOVED_TO_MARCH"}


건설/개인 로컬 메모/w50006-104 · 타워크레인 단독운전

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Someone wants me to announce that apprentices may run the tower crane solo during lunch shifts—what do the notes actually allow?","documents":[{"document_id":"현장메모·33·a","text":"Tower crane on Pad S: a certified operator must remain in the cab for every lift, including lunch-shift moves. Apprentices may observe and log radio traffic but may not operate the controls alone under any rostered hour."},{"document_id":"현장메모·33·b","text":"Cab keys are held by the certified operator and returned to the lockbox only at end of shift."},{"document_id":"현장메모·33·c","text":"Wind and radio checks still apply before each restart after lunch."},{"document_id":"현장메모·33·d","text":"Apprentice training hours are tracked on form TC-LOG, separate from operating authority."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Announcement would allow solo apprentice operation; notes require a certified operator in the cab at all times and ban solo apprentice control. Claim mismatch.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"APPRENTICE_SOLO_BANNED"}


교육/위키/w50006-105 · 동아리 여비 지급

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Student council asserts every registered club receives a travel stipend this semester. Does the finance wiki support that?","documents":[{"document_id":"UW·E·19.02","text":"Club finance wiki: ‘Travel stipends this cycle go only to clubs that reached the regional contest finals.’ Treasurer Mina: ‘Participation alone does not unlock the stipend.’"},{"document_id":"UW·E·19.06","text":"Council chat fragment: ‘People keep saying “every club”; that is not the rule we voted.’"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Stipends are limited to regional contest finalists. Extending them to every registered club overgeneralizes the finance rule.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"STIPEND_TO_ALL_CLUBS"}