개인 기록/일기·가계부·독서노트/w50003-258 · 일기백업실시주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
전자 일기 파일 백업을 매주 하는 게 이 집 규칙이라고 친구가 말해서요. 주기가 정말 매주인가요?

개인첩-Λ41 백업 주기는 다음과 같이 적혀 있다. 전자 일기 전체 폴더는 매월 첫 번째 일요일 오전에 외장 디스크로 복사한다. 주간 백업은 강제 사항이 아니며, 여행 기간처럼 일기를 자주 쓸 때만 임시로 주 일회 복사할 수 있다. 기본 주기는 월 일회다.

개인첩-Σ15는 외장 디스크 라벨 색을 초록으로 정한다. 디스크는 두 개를 돌려 가며 쓴다.

[Assistant] <think>Λ41은 기본 백업을 매월 첫 일요일로 두고 주간은 임시 선택이다. ‘매주가 규칙’은 주기를 왜곡한다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"Λ41 기본 주기는 매월 첫 일요일인데 매주 의무로 왜곡함"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
정기 점검 예외로 인정되는 기준이 최근 30일 이내 장애 5회 이상이라고 들었는데 맞는지 궁금합니다.

SOP 제2026-IT-077호(정기 점검 운영 지침)
제8조(예외 인정) ①최근 30일 이내 동일 시스템에서 3회 이상 중대 장애가 발생한 경우 해당 회차 정기 점검을 예외로 인정한다. ②예외 인정 시에도 익월 점검에는 반드시 포함해야 한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-078호(점검 일정 공지 지침)
제1조(공지 시기) 정기 점검 일정은 시행 7일 전 공지한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-079호(점검 인력 배치 지침)
제2조(인력 기준) 점검 인력은 최소 2인 1조로 배치한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-080호(점검 결과 보고 지침)
제3조(보고 기한) 점검 결과는 종료 후 3영업일 이내 보고한다.

[Assistant] <think>제8조 ①항은 최근 30일 이내 3회 이상 중대 장애 발생 시 예외를 인정한다고 규정한다. 질의자는 기준이 5회라고 주장했다. 근거상의 3회와 주장의 5회가 서로 다르다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"EXCEPTION_THRESHOLD_3_VS_5_CLAIM"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
정기 점검으로 인한 다운타임은 SLA 크레딧 계산에서 어떤 예외로 처리되나요? 고객이 크레딧 청구했는데 판단이 안 서서 문서 첨부합니다.

[BIL.26.031v3 / SLA 크레딧 정책]
월 가동률 99.9% 미만 시 구간별 크레딧 지급(99.0~99.9%: 10%, 99.0% 미만: 25%).

[BIL.26.031-부록 / 크레딧 산정표]
가동률 = (전체시간-다운타임)/전체시간 ×100. 산정 주기 매월 1일.

[Assistant] <think>두 문서 모두 크레딧 산정식과 구간만 다루고, 정기 점검 예외 여부는 언급이 없음.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MAINTENANCE_EXCEPTION_UNSTATED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50003-261 · 감사 회신 기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 정기감사 처분요구에 대한 조치결과 회신 기한이 며칠인지 수치만 규정에서 뽑아 달라. 한결-SR/24·09 제22조(조치결과의 통보) ① 처분요구를 받은 부서장은 처분요구서를 받은 날부터 10근무일 이내에 조치결과를 감사담당관에게 통보하여야 한다. ② 부득이한 사유로 기한 내 통보가 곤란한 때에는 그 사유와 예정일을 미리 통지한다. 한결-SR/24·09 제23조(미통보 시 조치) 기한 내 통보가 없으면 독촉한다.

[Assistant] <think>제22조①은 처분요구서 수령일부터 10근무일 이내 통보를 요구한다. 제23조는 미통보 독촉만 다룬다. 10근무일 주장은 문언과 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"REPLY_10_WORKDAYS"}


공공/사규·규정/w50003-262 · 심의위원 자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 정보공개 심의위원회 내부위원으로 위촉하려면 재직기간이 얼마여야 하는지 자격 문언을 대조해 달라. 한결-SR/24·12 제5조(위원의 자격) ① 내부위원은 해당 기관에 3년 이상 재직한 5급 이상 공무원 중에서 임명한다. ② 외부위원은 관련 분야 전문지식을 가진 사람 중에서 위촉한다. 한결-SR/24·12 제6조(임기) 위원의 임기는 2년으로 하며 한 차례 연임할 수 있다. 한결-SR/24·12 제7조(제척) 안건과 이해관계가 있는 위원은 심의에 참여할 수 없다.

[Assistant] <think>제5조①이 내부위원 자격을 재직 3년 이상·5급 이상으로 명시한다. 제6·7조는 임기·제척만 다룬다. 재직 3년 요건 주장은 조문과 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MEMBER_TENURE_3Y"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
정비 계약의 주기를 비교할 때, 집진 필터는 가동 240시간마다 교체하는 쪽이 맞는지 확인하고 싶습니다.
문서◇제조◇020 — 교체주기: 누적 가동 240시간
문서◇제조◇021 — 교체 전 확인: 차압 기록; 교체 후 확인: 누설 점검
문서◇제조◇022 — 주기 초기화: 교체 완료 서명 시점

[Assistant] <think>문서◇제조◇020이 누적 가동 240시간을 교체주기로 지정한다. 문서◇제조◇022는 교체 완료 뒤 주기 초기화를 명시해 기준을 뒷받침한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CYCLE_SUPPORTED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
정상가동과 긴급정지 기준을 비교 중입니다. 센서 경고가 연속 2회 발생하면 즉시 정지로 전환하는 절차가 맞나요?
문서◇제조◇011 — 경고 기준: 동일 센서 연속 2회; 조치: 즉시 정지
문서◇제조◇012 — 정지 후 조치: 원인 기록; 재가동 전 책임자 확인
문서◇제조◇013 — 단일 경고: 추적관찰; 연속 경고: 정지 전환
문서◇제조◇014 — 기록항목: 센서번호·발생시각·정지시각

[Assistant] <think>문서◇제조◇011은 연속 2회 경고를 즉시 정지 조건으로 둔다. 문서◇제조◇013도 단일 경고와 연속 경고의 조치를 구분한다. 나머지 문서는 정지 뒤 절차를 보강한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EXCEPTION_THRESHOLD_SUPPORTED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
주말 정비 요청은 어떤 순서로 승인되는지 두 일정표를 비교 중입니다. 현장책임자 승인 뒤 정비팀 작업으로 진행한다는 주장이 맞나요?
문서◇제조◇050 — 정비 승인순서: 현장책임자 검토 → 정비팀 배정 → 작업기록
문서◇제조◇051 — 적용일: 평일 정비; 주말 요청: 별도 항목 없음

[Assistant] <think>문서◇제조◇050은 평일 정비의 순서만 제시한다. 문서◇제조◇051에도 주말 요청의 별도 항목이 없어 주말 승인 순서를 판정할 근거가 부족하다.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"WEEKEND_SCOPE_MISSING"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50003-266 · 온도이탈 보고순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
지금 냉장창고 온도이탈 알람이 떴는데, 기록부터 하고 QA에 30분 안에 알린 다음에 각 부서장한테 전파되는 순서 맞나요? 급해서 빨리 확인 좀 해주세요.

[물류규정 제2026-19호 제7조 (온도이탈 대응절차)]
1. 현장 담당자는 온도 이탈을 감지하는 즉시 이탈 시각과 수치를 기록한다.
2. 이탈 감지 후 30분 이내에 품질보증팀에 유선으로 통보한다.
3. 품질보증팀은 통보를 접수한 즉시 각 부서장에게 상황을 전파한다.

[물류규정 제2026-19호 별첨2 (비상연락망)]
품질보증팀 당직 내선 3200, 물류팀장 내선 3310, 공장장 내선 3000.

[온도관리 매뉴얼 제3장 (냉동고 점검주기)]
냉동고는 일 2회(오전/오후) 정기점검을 실시하며 점검결과는 점검대장에 기록한다.

[Assistant] <think>1~3호가 기록→30분내 QA통보→부서장 전파 순서임. 질문자 서술과 정확히 일치.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TEMP_DEVIATION_ORDER_MATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
지난주 발생한 연동 장애와 관련하여 저희 담당자가 안내받기를, 귀사는 장애 발생 시 별도의 보고 기한 규정이 없고 요청이 있을 때에만 안내한다고 들었습니다. 이 내용이 맞는지 확인 부탁드립니다.

SOP 제2026-IT-052호(장애 대응 지침)
제9조(장애 보고) ①중대 장애는 인지 시점으로부터 4시간 이내에 고객사에 1차 보고한다. ②경미한 장애는 익영업일 오전 중 보고한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-053호(장애 등급 분류 지침)
제1조(등급 기준) 장애는 영향 범위에 따라 중대·경미로 구분한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-054호(고객 커뮤니케이션 지침)
제2조(공지 채널) 장애 공지는 고객 포털과 이메일을 통해 병행 발송한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-055호(사후 보고서 지침)
제4조(작성 기한) 장애 종결 후 5영업일 이내 사후 보고서를 작성한다.

[Assistant] <think>제9조는 중대 장애 4시간, 경미 장애 익영업일 보고를 명시해 규정이 존재한다. '보고 기한 규정이 없다'는 주장과 어긋난다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"INCIDENT_REPORT_RULE_EXISTS_CONTRADICTS_CLAIM"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
지원팀 리드가 구두로 승인해주면 고객 DB 덤프를 로컬로 반출해도 되는지 규정 대조해서 알려주세요. 급한 티켓이 있어서요.

[SUP.26.038 / 고객데이터 반출정책]
고객 데이터 반출은 데이터보안팀 서면 승인 필수. 구두승인은 인정하지 않음.

[SUP.26.038-A / 승인양식 안내]
반출승인 양식(DSF-01)에 데이터보안팀 서명 필요.

[SUP.26.038-B / 반출로그정책]
모든 반출 건은 익일까지 감사로그 등록.

[SUP.26.038-C / 예외신청절차]
비상시에도 사후 24시간 내 서면 승인 소급 제출 필수.

[Assistant] <think>정책은 '구두승인 인정 안함, 서면 승인 필수'로 명시. 지원팀 리드 구두승인은 이 요건을 무시함.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"VERBAL_APPROVAL_NOT_VALID"}


금융/사규·규정/w50003-269 · 전결한도과대일반화

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 지점장 전결 한도 관련해서 정리해 달라—지점장이면 모든 여신 전결 가능하다고 들었어요. κ금〔24-04V〕 전결표. 지점장 담보대출 3억·신용대출 1억까지. 초과는 지역본부장. κ금〔24-04W〕 특례. 정책자금은 전결표 적용 제외, 별도 지침.

[Assistant] <think>κ금〔24-04V〕는 담보 3억·신용 1억 한도만 허용한다. 모든 여신 전결 가능 주장은 한도·유형을 넘어 과대일반화다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"OVG_ALL"}


개인 기록/일기·가계부·독서노트/w50003-270 · 당일기입의무범위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
지출이 생기면 금액과 상관없이 모두 그날 바로 가계부에 적어야 하는 규칙인가요?

개인첩-Λ55 기입 시한 규칙은 이렇게 이어진다. 일만 원 이상의 지출만 결제 당일 자정까지 가계부에 넣는다. 일만 원 미만의 소액은 주말에 묶음 정리해도 된다. 경조사비처럼 금액이 커도 영수증이 늦게 도착하면 수령 당일 기입으로 예외를 둔다.

개인첩-Σ24는 소액 묶음 정리 시 사용처를 ‘소액합’ 한 줄로 적어도 된다고 부연한다.

[Assistant] <think>Λ55는 당일 기입 의무를 일만 원 이상에 한정하고 소액은 주말 묶음을 허용한다. ‘금액 무관 전부 당일’은 범위를 키운 과일반화다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"Λ55는 1만원 이상만 당일 기입인데 전 지출 당일로 확대함"}


교육·학습/강의 노트/w50003-271 · 문의처리우선

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
질의는 자료 접근 오류와 일반 내용 문의 중 어느 쪽을 먼저 처리하나요?
강의노트〈유리숲/26〉에는 일반 내용 문의는 답변 자료를 찾아 처리한다고 적혀 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/27〉에는 문의를 접수 순서대로 기록한다고 명시되어 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/28〉에는 자료 접근 오류를 일반 내용 문의보다 우선 처리한다고 적혀 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/29〉에는 처리 결과를 문의 기록에 남긴다고 덧붙였다.

[Assistant] <think>노트 28은 자료 접근 오류를 일반 내용 문의보다 우선 처리한다고 명시한다. 질문의 우선순위 판단과 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"문의우선순위_근거일치"}


금융/사규·규정/w50003-272 · 광고심의시행일왜곡

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 집합투자 광고 사전심의, 2024-01-01부터 전면 시행됐다고 보면 되나요? κ금〔24-14AJ〕 광고심의. 시행일 2024-07-01. 그 전 제작분은 게시 종료일까지 유예. κ금〔24-14AK〕 심의 창구. 준법 광고심의반, 영업일 5일 표준 처리.

[Assistant] <think>κ금〔24-14AJ〕 시행일은 2024-07-01이다. 2024-01-01 전면 시행 주장은 날짜를 앞당긴 왜곡이다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"DATE_FLIP"}


교육·학습/강의 노트/w50003-273 · 청각자료자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
청각 자료 이용 자격을 신청하려면 4개 모듈 수료가 필요한가요?
강의노트〈유리숲/14〉에는 청각 자료가 자막 자료와 함께 제공된다고 적혀 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/15〉에는 신청서에 수강 분반을 기록한다고 명시되어 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/16〉에는 이용 자격을 기초 모듈 4개 수료로 정한다고 적혀 있다.

[Assistant] <think>노트 16은 청각 자료 이용 자격을 “기초 모듈 4개 수료”로 둔다. 14와 15는 제공 방식과 신청 기록을 설명한다. 질문의 4개 요건은 근거와 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"자격요건_근거일치"}


교육·학습/강의 노트/w50003-274 · 초안제출순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
초안 검토와 최종 제출 중 어느 작업을 먼저 두나요?
강의노트〈유리숲/53〉에는 최종 제출 파일의 형식만 적혀 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/54〉에는 초안 검토 완료 뒤 최종 제출을 하도록 명시되어 있다.

[Assistant] <think>노트 54는 초안 검토 완료 뒤 최종 제출을 하도록 한다. 질문의 작업 순서와 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"초안제출_순서일치"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
출하 점검표 두 장을 어떤 순서로 적용할지 비교 중입니다. 초안을 먼저 확인하고 확정본으로 판정하면 되며, 초안 결과도 출하 승인 근거로 쓸 수 있다는 주장이 맞나요?
문서◇제조◇027 — 상태: 통제 초안; 사용범위: 교육 전용; 출하 판정 근거: 금지
문서◇제조◇028 — 확정본 발행 전 기록: 무효; 승인 근거: 확정본 기록만 인정

[Assistant] <think>문서◇제조◇027은 초안을 교육 전용으로 제한하고 출하 판정 근거 사용을 금지한다. 문서◇제조◇028도 확정본 기록만 인정하므로 초안의 승인 근거성을 인정한 주장은 어긋난다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"DRAFT_STATUS_IGNORED"}


유통/회의록/w50003-276 · 콜드체인 점검주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 콜드체인 차량 온도 점검이 며칠마다인지 다른 팀에 전달하려 합니다. 회의에서는 격일 점검이라고 기억하는데 근거를 확인해 주세요. 분과록·24κ-03 물류품질 회의는 먼저 하역장 동선 표지판 교체 일정을 다루었다. 이어 온도 로그 안건에서 냉장·냉동 합동 운송 차량은 출고 전·중·후 점검과 별도로 운행 중 온도를 격일마다 원격으로 확인한다고 합의했다고 서술되어 있다. 분과록·24κ-04는 포장재 단가 재협상 메모이고, 분과록·24κ-05는 하반기 안전교육 출석 현황만 남겼다.

[Assistant] <think>분과록·24κ-03은 운행 중 온도를 격일 원격 확인한다고 적었다. 주장이 그 주기를 그대로 따른다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CYCLE_MATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
테스트 계정으로 운영 DB에 접속하면 안 되는 거 맞죠? 감사팀에서 계정 이력 물어봐서 급하게 확인합니다.

[HRT.24.019 / 계정관리지침]
테스트/샘플 계정은 운영(Production) 환경 접속 금지. 위반 적발 시 계정 즉시 정지 및 사유서 제출.

[Assistant] <think>지침에 '테스트/샘플 계정은 운영 환경 접속 금지'로 명확히 규정됨.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TEST_ACCOUNT_PROD_BLOCKED"}


금융/사규·규정/w50003-278 · 퇴직연금세금한도공백

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 퇴직연금 세액공제 한도가 연간 얼마인지 알려줄 수 있어요? κ금〔24-28AL〕 운용지시. 지시 접수→유효성 점검→운용사 전송 순. 마감 15:30. κ금〔24-28AM〕 부정지시. 잔고 부족·상품 폐쇄 시 반려 코드 부여. κ금〔24-28AN〕 정정. 당일 마감 전 1회 정정 허용.

[Assistant] <think>제시 문서는 운용지시 처리 순서·마감·반려만 다룬다. 세액공제 한도 수치를 말하는 근거가 없어 판정 불가.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TOPIC_GAP"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
파트너사 인증 요건 중 운영 실적 기준이 궁금하여 문의드립니다. 3년 이상 서비스를 운영한 업체만 신청 가능한 것으로 알고 있는데 맞습니까?

SOP 제2026-IT-084호(파트너사 인증 지침)
제3조(신청 자격) ①신청일 기준 자사 서비스를 3년 이상 연속 운영한 법인이어야 한다. ②최근 1년 내 계약 해지 이력이 있는 업체는 신청할 수 없다.

SOP 제2026-IT-085호(인증 심사 절차 지침)
제1조(심사 주기) 인증 심사는 연 2회 정기적으로 실시한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-086호(인증 갱신 지침)
제2조(갱신 주기) 인증 유효기간은 2년이며, 만료 전 갱신 신청을 해야 한다.

[Assistant] <think>제3조 ①항은 신청일 기준 3년 이상 연속 운영을 자격 요건으로 규정한다. 질의자의 3년 주장과 정확히 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PARTNER_CERT_3YR_MATCH"}


유통/회의록/w50003-280 · 입고검수 샘플비율

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 팔레트 단위 입고 때 외관 검수 샘플 비율이 전체의 20퍼센트라고 현장 가이드에 쓰려 합니다. 회의 합의와 같은 숫자인지 대조해 주세요. 분과록·24κ-39 입고품질 회의 앞부분은 라벨 프린터 고장 이력을 적었다. 샘플링 문단에는 팔레트 입고 외관 검수는 박스 수 기준 8퍼센트를 무작위로 뽑되 최소 4박스, 최대 12박스로 상한을 둔다고 수치를 명시했다. 분과록·24κ-40은 지게차 충전 구역 도색 일정이다.

[Assistant] <think>분과록·24κ-39는 외관 검수 샘플을 박스 수 기준 8퍼센트(최소 4·최대 12)로 둔다. 20퍼센트 주장은 비율을 키운 왜곡이다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"SAMPLE_RATE_WRONG"}


금융/사규·규정/w50003-281 · 펀드판매자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 펀드 팔려면 자격이 뭐가 필요해요? κ금〔24-19L〕 판매자격. 집합투자 판매인 등록 + 최근 1년 내 보수교육 이수. 미이수 시 판매 화면 잠금. κ금〔24-19M〕 교육. 보수교육 8시간, 온라인 인정. κ금〔24-19N〕 등록 만료. 등록 유효 3년, 만료 30일 전 재신청.

[Assistant] <think>등록과 최근 1년 보수교육이 κ금〔24-19L〕 요건이다. 교육 시간·등록 유효기간 문서는 요건을 보강할 뿐 배치지 않는다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVID_ALIGN"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
포장 방식 두 가지의 라벨 작업을 비교 중입니다. 내부 봉인 확인 뒤 라벨 출력, 부착, 스캔 순서로 처리한다는 주장이 맞나요?
문서◇제조◇006 — 작업순서: 내부 봉인 확인 → 라벨 출력 → 라벨 부착 → 스캔
문서◇제조◇007 — 스캔 실패: 부착 전 라벨 재출력; 확인항목: 봉인 상태
문서◇제조◇008 — 완료조건: 부착 라벨과 스캔 기록 일치

[Assistant] <think>문서◇제조◇006이 네 단계의 순서를 그대로 제시한다. 문서◇제조◇007과 ◇008도 부착 전 재출력과 스캔 완료를 보강한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ORDER_DIRECTLY_SUPPORTED"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50003-283 · 이상반응 보고우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
피험자 두 분 이상반응 보고 때문에 급해서요. 피험자 김OO(코드 CT-045) 님은 중대 이상반응이고, 박OO(코드 CT-051) 님은 경미한 이상반응인데, 중대한 건 24시간 안에 최우선으로 올리고 경미한 건 월간 정기보고서에 넣으면 되는 거 맞나요?

[약물감시규정 제2026-45호 제6조 (이상반응 보고 우선순위)]
중대한 이상반응(SAE)을 인지한 경우 인지 시점으로부터 24시간 이내에 최우선으로 보고하여야 한다. 비중대 이상반응은 월간 정기보고서에 포함하여 보고한다.

[이상반응 보고서식 별첨3]
보고서에는 피험자 코드, 발생일시, 증상, 중대성 여부를 기재한다.

[개인정보 취급 안내]
피험자 실명은 보고서에 기재하지 않으며 피험자 코드로만 관리한다.

[Assistant] <think>제6조는 SAE는 24시간 내 최우선 보고로 규정함. 비중대는 월간보고 포함이라 서술과 일치.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SAE_PRIORITY_MATCH"}


교육·학습/강의 노트/w50003-284 · 보고서제출주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
학습 진행 보고서의 제출 주기를 확인해 주세요.
강의노트〈유리숲/37〉에는 보고서에 진도와 막힌 지점을 기록한다고 적혀 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/38〉에는 학습자별 회고 문단을 포함한다고 명시되어 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/39〉에는 보고서 공유 채널을 지정한다고 적혀 있다.
강의노트〈유리숲/40〉에는 완료된 보고서를 보관한다고 덧붙였다.

[Assistant] <think>노트 37과 38은 보고서 항목을 설명한다. 39와 40은 공유와 보관을 다룬다. 주간인지 월간인지에 대한 문장은 없다.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"보고서주기_근거범위부족"}


개인 기록/일기·가계부·독서노트/w50003-285 · 연간저축점검일자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
한 해 저축 목표를 가계부에서 점검하는 날이 매년 삼 월이라고 기억하는데, 날짜가 맞는지 확인해 주고 싶어요.

개인첩-Λ50 연간 점검 일정 문단은 이렇게 적는다. 저축 목표 대비 실적 점검은 매년 일 월 십오 일에 실시한다. 그날 가계부 연간 요약 페이지에 달성률을 적고, 미달 시 이월 금액을 별도 칸에 옮긴다. 삼 월은 보험 만기 확인 달로만 표시되어 있다.

개인첩-Σ03은 달성률 계산식을 납입 합계 나누기 목표액으로 단순 정의한다.

[Assistant] <think>Λ50은 저축 점검을 매년 1월 15일로 두고 3월은 보험 만기용이다. 점검일을 3월로 옮긴 주장은 날짜 왜곡이다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"Λ50 저축 점검은 1월 15일인데 3월로 일자를 왜곡함"}


금융/사규·규정/w50003-286 · 한도증액승인권자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 한도 증액 승인 누가 해요? 처음이라 헷갈림. κ금〔24-07C〕 한도증액. 5억 초과→본점 여신심의위. 5억 이하→지점장 전결. κ금〔24-07D〕 심의 소집. 심의위 개최는 신청 접수 후 10영업일 이내. κ금〔24-07E〕 전결 기록. 전결 건은 주간 본점 보고.

[Assistant] <think>5억 초과 본점 여신심의위·이하 지점장 전결이 κ금〔24-07C〕에 그대로 있다. 소집·보고 문서는 주체 규정을 뒤집지 않음.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVID_ALIGN"}


공공/사규·규정/w50003-287 · 해외연수 여비공백

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 해외 공무연수 시 체재비 상한은 1일 얼마로 보면 되는지 규정상 수치를 확인해 달라. 한결-SR/24·10 제8조(국내 여비) ① 국내 출장의 운임·일비·숙박비는 여비지급기준표에 따른다. ② 관내 출장은 일비의 2분의 1을 지급한다. 한결-SR/24·10 제9조(여비의 계산) 출장 기간은 출발일과 귀임일을 산입한다. 한결-SR/24·02 제4조(적용 제외) 이 편의 규정은 국내 근무·국내 출장에 한하여 적용한다.

[Assistant] <think>제시 조문은 국내 여비·계산·국내 한정 적용만 다룬다. 해외 연수 체재비 상한 수치나 산정 방식은 어디에도 없다. 쟁점 자체를 다루는 근거가 없어 판정할 수 없다.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_OVERSEAS_PER_DIEM"}


공공/사규·규정/w50003-288 · 공용차량 배정순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 현장출장과 관내 회의가 겹칠 때 공용차 배정 우선순위가 어떻게 되는지 우선순위 조항을 확인해 달라. 한결-SR/24·16 제4조(배정 우선순위) ① 공용차량은 다음 각 호의 순위에 따라 배정한다. 1. 재난·안전 현장 출동 2. 관외 현장출장 3. 관내 공식회의 참석 4. 기타 공무. ② 동일 순위에서는 신청 시각이 앞선 신청을 우선한다. 한결-SR/24·16 제5조(예약) 사용 예정일 전전일까지 예약하여야 한다. 한결-SR/24·01 제2조(용어) 관외란 시 행정구역 밖을 말한다.

[Assistant] <think>제4조①제2호 관외 현장출장이 제3호 관내 공식회의보다 앞선다. 동일 순위가 아니면 신청 시각 규정은 개입하지 않는다. 현장출장 우선 배정 주장은 순위표와 맞다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"VEHICLE_PRIORITY_OK"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
협력사 입장에서 문의드립니다. 보안 사고 발생 시 1차 대응 책임자는 정보보안팀장이라고 알고 있는데 맞나요?

SOP 제2026-IT-059호(보안 사고 대응 지침)
제2조(대응 체계) ①보안 사고 인지 시 정보보안팀장이 1차 대응을 총괄한다. ②정보보안팀장 부재 시에는 정보보안팀 선임 담당자가 대행한다.

SOP 제2026-IT-060호(외부 신고 접수 지침)
제1조(접수 채널) 외부 보안 신고는 전용 이메일을 통해 접수한다.

[Assistant] <think>제2조 ①항은 정보보안팀장이 1차 대응을 총괄한다고 규정해 질의자의 주장과 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SECURITY_LEAD_ROLE_MATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
혼합 배치 용량이 다른 선택지를 비교 중인데, 혼합로 한 배치는 480킬로그램을 넘기면 안 된다는 기준이 맞나요?
문서◇제조◇018 — 배치 상한: 480킬로그램; 초과 처리: 금지
문서◇제조◇019 — 계량 확인: 투입 전 총량 기록; 상한 초과 시 배치 재분할

[Assistant] <think>문서◇제조◇018이 배치 상한을 480킬로그램으로 명시한다. 문서◇제조◇019도 초과 시 재분할하도록 하므로 주장과 근거가 맞는다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"BATCH_LIMIT_SUPPORTED"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-1 · 저자표기 우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
A collaborator insisted that in any authorship dispute in the department, whoever contributed more to data analysis automatically wins first-author priority. Does the excerpt below actually say that broadly?

Oakwell Multi-Lab Research Consortium
File No. R26-024 — "Authorship Priority for Jointly-Funded Multi-Lab Experiments"
- Scope: applies specifically to co-first-author disputes arising from collaborative experiments jointly funded by two or more member labs of the Consortium
- Within that scope, priority goes to whichever contributor performed the majority of data analysis, as recorded in the shared lab notebook system
- Disputes outside this scope (single-lab studies, non-jointly-funded work) are handled under each lab's own authorship policy, not this rule
- Disputed decisions may be appealed to the Consortium Publications Committee within 30 days

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"priority_rule_scope_overextended"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
API 한도를 상향하려는 고객 문의가 들어와서 기준을 확인해야 한다. API 호출 한도를 상향하려면 계약금액이 얼마 이상이어야 하는가?

[SOP-IT 2026-33호 API이용지침 6조]
- 월간 API 호출 한도 상향은 연 계약금액 5000만원 이상인 고객에 한해 신청할 수 있다

[별첨9 API이용지침 7조]
- 한도 상향 신청은 고객지원팀을 통해 접수하며 심사에는 최대 5영업일이 소요된다

[Assistant] <think>6조는 상향 신청 자격을 연 계약금액 5000만원 이상으로 명시하며 문의 내용과 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"THRESHOLD_MATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
API 호출 제한 넘기면 그 요청만 막히고 계정 자체는 안 잠기는 거 맞지? 다른 서비스랑 비교해보려고 사내 위키 인터뷰 내용 가져왔어.

[정책카드 24-01-다 / 코드리퍼블릭 엔지니어링 위키 인터뷰 발췌]
담당 개발자(최민): 분당 60회 제한을 넘긴 요청은 429 오류로 하나씩만 거부돼요. 계정 자체가 잠기거나 서비스 이용이 중단되는 일은 없고요, 한도는 매 분마다 초기화됩니다.

[Assistant] <think>개발자 발언은 초과 요청만 429로 거부되고 계정 잠김은 없다고 함. 사용자 주장과 그대로 일치.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"RATE_LIMIT_NO_LOCKOUT"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-4 · 센서로그 보관기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
According to what I have, the raw sensor logs must be kept until 2028-11-30, five years from when the sensors first started recording data back in late 2023. Can you check this against the excerpt below?

Northfield Applied Physics Lab
File No. R26-015 — "Data Retention Policy for Sensor Array Study NP-7"
- Raw sensor logs (unprocessed telemetry) must be retained for 5 years counted from the date of the final Data-Closure Certificate, not from the initial data collection date
- Data-Closure Certificate for Study NP-7 was issued 2025-11-30
- Processed and aggregated datasets are retained for 10 years from the same certificate date
- After the mandatory retention period, raw logs may be deleted only with written clearance from the Data Governance Office

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"retention_start_date_misattributed"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-5 · 혼합후폐기시한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] After mixing Clorvane granules with water, how soon must the cup be finished? Claim: the full mixture must be swallowed within 30 minutes of preparation. Kitchen-counter counseling, LEAF§κ·06: Parent: "Can I mix at breakfast and drink at lunch?" Pharmacist: "Preparation note: consume entire mixture within 30 minutes; discard any remainder after that window. Do not store mixed liquid." LEAF§κ·06r repeats the 30-minute consume-or-discard rule.

[Assistant] <think>Both preparation notes require finishing within 30 minutes and discarding leftovers. Claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MIXTURE_MUST_BE_TAKEN_WITHIN_30_MINUTES"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-6 · 방과후연령자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Age gate for after-school craft lab — must the child be in grades 1–4 only, with grade 5 waitlisted separately? Comparing Lab East vs Lab West:
PNote/24·130 — after-school craft. Enroll grades 1–4 only. Grade 5–6: waitlist STEM track only, not craft. Guardian pickup by 18:30.
PNote/24·131 — fee 40k/mo. Fee waiver if free-meal status. Snacks nut-free. Max 16 seats/room.
PNote/24·09 — bus loop ends 17:50; late walk home needs written note.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CRAFT_LAB_GRADES_1_TO_4_ONLY"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-7 · 관할창구 불명

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
At this counter, the file concerns a resident of Embercoil Ward but the project sits in Larkspur Reach; which office should receive the permit appeal?

Jurisdiction notice VELLUM/ORBIT/10-B defines resident and project territories. Intake guide VELLUM/ORBIT/10-D lists the appeal form. Routing memo VELLUM/ORBIT/10-A says appeals must go to the competent office without naming it. Boundary map VELLUM/ORBIT/10-C shows both territories but gives no routing rule.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"jurisdiction_route_not_specified"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-8 · 폭풍폐쇄 기준

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
At what wind reading should the coastal market be closed under the storm notice?

Storm notice VELLUM/ORBIT/20-D requires monitors to report wind readings every 17 minutes. Closure procedure VELLUM/ORBIT/20-A assigns the decision to the coastal coordinator. Alert form VELLUM/ORBIT/20-B records readings and public messages. Safety note VELLUM/ORBIT/20-C mentions hazardous wind without stating a threshold.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"closure_threshold_not_stated"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-9 · 원격진료자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Before I coach a colleague on tele-follow-up eligibility, I need to know whether the packets even answer the rural-residency question. Claim: physicians holding only a provisional Q-link certificate may conduct video follow-ups for patients whose primary residence is outside the metro ring under Ω-CG/24·41. Available evidence: Ω-CG/24·41 Article 3 (Tele-follow-up Privileges) — ① Full Q-link certification is required to initiate new video consultations. ② Provisional Q-link holders may join a full-certified physician as a second camera participant. ③ No clause addresses patient rural versus metro residence. Ω-CG/24·16 Article 10 lists broadband bandwidth minima for video carts and is silent on clinician certification tiers.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_SILENT_ON_RURAL_RESIDENCE_RULE"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-10 · 재활용함규격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Before I pick a bin size, does the building need a separate food-waste grinder approval if we only have the 120L mixed recyclables bin? Shopping two vendors:
PNote/24·75 — recycle bin. Multi-unit ≥10 households: at least one 120L rigid bin w/ lid. Label 4 streams. Collection Tue/Fri.
PNote/24·76 — bulk sticker for furniture. No text on food grinders or compost units.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"GUIDE_SILENT_ON_FOOD_GRINDER_APPROVAL"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-11 · 임상시험중단조건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Before I summarize for the research nurses, I need clarity on whether the stop rule for grade-4 hepatic events in protocol Velora-Hep is covered at all in the packets I was given. Claim: enrollment in Velora-Hep must be halted site-wide after any single grade-4 drug-related hepatic event under Ω-CG/24·88. Evidence pack: Ω-CG/24·88 Article 12 (Velora-Hep Safety Holds) — ① Individual participant dosing stops after a grade-3 or higher drug-related hepatic event. ② Site-wide enrollment hold criteria are defined only for unexpected deaths within 24 hours of dosing. ③ Grade-4 hepatic events are not listed as a trigger for site-wide enrollment halt. Ω-CG/24·50 Article 1 is a general adverse-event glossary without protocol-specific hold rules.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SITEWIDE_HOLD_NOT_DEFINED_FOR_G4_HEPATIC"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-12 · 갱신절차 순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Before a market-stall permit is renewed, the clerk needs to know whether the fee receipt comes before the safety inspection; does the notice settle that order?

Renewal notice VELLUM/ORBIT/16-A requires both a fee receipt and a safety inspection report. Checklist VELLUM/ORBIT/16-B lists the two documents but does not state which must come first.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"renewal_sequence_not_stated"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-13 · 원격확인 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Before dispatching an inspector, can the clerk accept remote identity verification when the applicant's island ferry is suspended for 9 hours?

Baseline notice VELLUM/ORBIT/03-A requires face-to-face identity checks. Exception VELLUM/ORBIT/03-C permits remote verification after a ferry suspension exceeding 8 hours, provided two live checks and the suspension code are logged. Log form VELLUM/ORBIT/03-B contains fields for both entries.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"remote_exception_matches"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-14 · 투석간수분한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Between the 1.0 L and 1.5 L interdialytic fluid caps, which figure should I put on the patient handout for standard thrice-weekly hemodialysis? Claim: interdialytic fluid gain target for standard thrice-weekly adult hemodialysis is not to exceed 1.0 liter under Ω-CG/24·09. Evidence: Ω-CG/24·09 Article 11 (Fluid Targets) — ① For adults on thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis, interdialytic fluid gain shall not exceed one point five (1.5) liters. ② Gains above that threshold trigger a documented counseling encounter. ③ Daily home dialysis fluid targets are set separately in Article 15. Ω-CG/24·33 Article 4 concerns dialyzer reuse and does not set fluid caps.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"CLAIM_USES_1L_WHERE_TEXT_SETS_1_5L"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-15 · 센터예약절차순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Between two booking paths for the ward hall, which step comes first — room lock or deposit? Comparing as a parent group:
PNote/24·18 — hall book. Order fixed: (1) online slot hold (2) deposit 30% same day (3) room key pickup D-1. Skip deposit → hold auto-drop at 18:00.
PNote/24·19 — weekend surcharge +15%. Cleaning fee separate. No deposit refund if cancel <48h.
PNote/24·02 — group size cap 40. AV kit extra form after key pickup only.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"BOOKING_ORDER_HOLD_THEN_DEPOSIT_THEN_KEY"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-16 · 인증요건 확인

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can a newly hired assessor sign a soil-risk memo after completing the 6-module course and the observed field exercise?

Certification notice VELLUM/ORBIT/11-A requires both the 6-module course and one observed field exercise before signature authority begins. Register VELLUM/ORBIT/11-B records those two items as the complete entry conditions.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"certification_requirements_match"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-17 · 자료공유 신뢰

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can the registry team send household contact hashes to the Tideloom Relief Cooperative under the cited data-sharing bulletin?

Bulletin VELLUM/ORBIT/14-C says household contact hashes may be sent to Tideloom Relief Cooperative for relief scheduling. Index VELLUM/ORBIT/14-A marks that bulletin revoked on 2038-09-16. Control note VELLUM/ORBIT/14-B says revoked bulletins cannot authorize a transfer.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"revoked_bulletin_cannot_authorize_transfer"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-18 · 사용개시최저연령

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Can twelve-year-olds start Ruvenda nasal spray on their own per the leaflet? Claim: self-administration is approved from age 12. Parent hotline transcript citing LEAF§κ·55: Agent: "What ages are covered?" Reader: "Indications paragraph covers adults 18 years and older for seasonal allergic rhinitis; pediatric sections are limited to a note that studies in adolescents are ongoing." LEAF§κ·55b storage card and LEAF§κ·55c spray-count card never mention age gates for self-use.

[Assistant] <think>Supplied leaflets discuss adult indication and ongoing adolescent studies only. No self-administration age-12 rule is stated, so the age claim cannot be settled.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_AGE12_SELF_ADMIN_RULE_IN_PROVIDED_LEAVES"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-19 · 정산보고 제출주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can you confirm the settlement report is due every 3 months, as stated in the summary I received?

Registry Entry #612/A — Research Funding Compliance Division, Mission Note: The Division audits grant expenditure reporting for all multi-year awards issued under the Fund's extended tracks.

Registry Entry #612/H — Research Fund Settlement Reporting Cycle, Section 1: Grant recipients under the Extended Multi-Year track must submit a settlement report every 4 months, beginning from the date of the first disbursement.

Registry Entry #612/J — Standard Track Note: Recipients under the Standard track follow a separate annual reporting cycle, distinct from the Extended Multi-Year track.

Registry Entry #612/K — Late Filing Penalty Schedule: Reports submitted more than 15 days past the due date are subject to a formal compliance notice.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"CYCLE_IS_4_MONTHS_NOT_3"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-20 · 반려동물등록벌금

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can you tell if microchip re-scan is free after a move to another ward? Weighing two clinics for my dog:
PNote/24·14 — pet reg. First chip free at ward vet day. Late reg fine 50k after 30 days from acquire. Lost tag reissue 8k.
PNote/24·15 — leash in parks. Bite report → 7-day owner class. No mention of inter-ward chip policy.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_EVIDENCE_ON_INTERWARD_RESCAN_FEE"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-21 · 공원상업촬영금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Commercial photo shoot in Ribbon Park — is paid product filming banned without a day permit, while personal wedding stills are free if no crew >3? Two packages from studios:
PNote/24·95 — park media. Commercial / product / paid crew: day permit required. Personal wedding/family: free if crew ≤3 and no drone.
PNote/24·96 — drone always permit + insurance. Dawn slot priority lottery Fri 09:00.
PNote/24·04 — picnic tents OK under 3×3m. No generators near pond.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"COMMERCIAL_NEEDS_PERMIT_PERSONAL_SMALL_CREW_FREE"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-22 · 소음민원응답시한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Comparing ward scripts — does a first noise complaint get an on-site visit within 24 hours as some flyers say?
PNote/24·60 — noise SLA. First report: phone triage same day. On-site only if 2nd report in 7 days or night breach ≥3 times. Mediation offer day 3.
PNote/24·61 — decibel meter loan free after triage. Log sheet required for escalate.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"FIRST_REPORT_PHONE_ONLY_NOT_ONSITE_24H"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-23 · 연구노트 보존한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Could you summarize whether the retention period and storage cap I have on record — 10 years and a 5GB limit per project — match what's specified here?

Registry Entry #451/A — Research Data Stewardship Office, Mission Statement: The Office maintains standards for the retention, security, and accessibility of research records across all affiliated laboratories.

Registry Entry #451/F — Laboratory Notebook Retention and Digital Storage Policy, Section 6: All electronic laboratory notebooks must be retained for a minimum of 10 years following project closure. Each project's notebook archive is capped at 5GB of storage on the institutional server; entries exceeding this cap must be migrated to cold storage.

Registry Entry #451/G — Cold Storage Vendor Note: The current cold storage contract is held with an external archival vendor under a five-year service agreement.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"RETENTION_AND_CAP_CONFIRMED"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-24 · 자가주사교육자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Do caregivers need a formal certificate before they may inject Feltrix at home? Claim: a hospital-issued subcutaneous injection certificate is mandatory for any non-patient injector. Discharge teaching notes for LEAF§κ·88: Educator: "Who can inject?" Nurse: "Patients or trained caregivers may administer after live demonstration and teach-back; the carton does not mention a formal certificate number." LEAF§κ·88b needle-safety card and LEAF§κ·88c disposal card also omit certificate requirements.

[Assistant] <think>Evidence requires demonstration and teach-back only. Certificate mandate is not addressed, so verdict cannot affirm or deny that credential rule.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CERTIFICATE_REQUIREMENT_ABSENT_FROM_SUPPLIED_TEXTS"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-25 · 박사후 신청자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Does a postdoctoral researcher on a part-time appointment qualify under this eligibility clause?

Registry Entry #845/A — Early-Career Research Support Fund, Founding Note: The Fund was established to provide seed grants to researchers within the first five years of their doctoral degree.

Registry Entry #845/B — Application Deadline Note: Applications for the current cycle must be submitted by the last business day of September.

Registry Entry #845/K — Postdoctoral Early-Career Grant Eligibility Criteria, Section 2: Applicants must (a) hold a doctoral degree conferred within the past 5 years; (b) be employed in a research position at a qualifying institution at the time of application; (c) not have previously received this grant.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_MENTION_OF_PART_TIME_STATUS"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-26 · 수도연체료산정

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Does late-fee stacking stop after month three, with a flat 5% on the unpaid balance each month until then? Comparing auto-pay vs manual:
PNote/24·85 — water late fee. Day 1–30 overdue: +3% once. Day 31–90: +5% of remaining balance each calendar month, max three hits. After day 90: no new late %; shut-notice path instead.
PNote/24·86 — auto-pay discount 1% if zero miss in 12 mo. Leak credit separate form.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"LATE_PCT_CAPS_THREE_MONTHLY_HITS_THEN_SHUT_PATH"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-27 · 격리해제절차순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Does terminal cleaning come before or after the second negative PCR when stepping a patient out of droplet isolation, so I can walk the cleaners through the correct order? Claim under Ω-CG/24·14: the mandated sequence is (1) two consecutive negative PCR results 24 hours apart, then (2) terminal cleaning of the room, then (3) removal of isolation signage. Supporting articles: Ω-CG/24·14 Article 7 (Release from Droplet Isolation) — ① Release requires two consecutive negative PCR assays collected at least twenty-four hours apart. ② After the second negative result is verified in the chart, Environmental Services performs terminal cleaning. ③ Isolation signage is removed only after terminal cleaning is signed off. Ω-CG/24·19 Article 2 covers visitor hours and does not define release order.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SEQUENCE_PCR_THEN_CLEAN_THEN_SIGNAGE"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-28 · 장기기증통보기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Does the organ-referral chapter say anything about how soon the regional donor desk must be called after brain-death testing is completed, or is that gap why my notes stop short? Claim: the regional donor coordination desk must be notified within 30 minutes after completion of the second brain-death examination under Ω-CG/24·81. Available text: Ω-CG/24·81 Article 7 (Donor Referral Timing) — ① Referral to the regional donor coordination desk is required after the first clinical examination suggesting brain death. ② The article specifies that referral shall not be delayed for family meetings. ③ No numeric minute or hour deadline after the second examination is stated. Ω-CG/24·04 Article 3 lists ICU bed-allocation priorities and does not set donor-desk clocks.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_NUMERIC_DEADLINE_AFTER_SECOND_EXAM"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-29 · 공공주택대기순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Does the waitlist put multi-child households ahead of single elders when both score the same points? Trying to pick which unit type to chase:
PNote/24·21 — public house queue. Tie-break order: (1) multi-child (2+) (2) disability HH (3) single elder 65+ (4) lottery. Points equal only then.
PNote/24·22 — unit size by HH count. 1–2p → type S. 3–4p → type M. Pet: one small only if type M+.
PNote/24·05 — move-in docs due 14 days after offer. Miss → next on list.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TIEBREAK_MULTICHILD_BEFORE_SINGLE_ELDER"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-30 · 청문 발언 금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
During the Morrowfen Assembly hearing, may a moderator read an unverified allegation into the public record when the speaker insists it is urgent?

Withdrawn draft VELLUM/ORBIT/04-B says a moderator may read an unverified allegation when a speaker marks it urgent. Registry note VELLUM/ORBIT/04-A records that the draft was withdrawn on 2038-11-02 and has no operative effect.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"withdrawn_draft_has_no_effect"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-31 · 건물외벽색상제한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Facade palette rule — is brand X’s “Harbor Teal” on the approved list for street-facing walls in the craft district? Choosing among three paint quotes:
PNote/24·110 — facade colors. Street face: only palette codes F-01–F-12 (warm grey, clay, soft cream). Accent door: any matte. Neon / pure chroma ban.
PNote/24·111 — rear alley walls free. Mural on side wall needs arts desk stamp. No brand-name chart in guide.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_BRAND_MAPPING_ONLY_PALETTE_CODES"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-32 · 항생제선택우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] For a ward pocket card, is first-line empiric therapy for non-severe community pneumonia listed as moxavil or ceftraxil-azithral under the adult pathway? Claim: first-line empiric therapy for non-severe community-acquired pneumonia in adults is oral moxavil under Ω-CG/24·36. Evidence: Ω-CG/24·36 Article 8 (Adult CAP Empiric Ladder) — ① Non-severe community-acquired pneumonia: first-line is ceftraxil plus azithral. ② Moxavil is reserved for beta-lactam allergy documented in the allergy module. ③ Severe CAP pathways begin at Article 9 and are out of scope here. Ω-CG/24·21 Article 1 only defines severity scoring thresholds.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"MOXAVIL_IS_ALLERGY_ALTERNATE_NOT_FIRST_LINE"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-33 · 예비결과 공개금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
For an article I'm writing, I need to confirm: is it against this institute's rules to post preliminary findings from the project to a public preprint server before the internal Data Integrity Review wraps up? Excerpt attached:

Aldermoor Institute for Materials Science
File No. R26-019 — "Pre-Peer-Review Disclosure Policy"
- Researchers may present preliminary findings at internal seminars and closed departmental colloquia without restriction
- Preliminary findings may not be posted to public preprint servers, personal blogs, or social media before the internal Data Integrity Review is complete
- Preliminary findings may not be shared with external industry partners without a signed NDA, even after the Data Integrity Review is complete
- Violations are referred to the Research Conduct Panel

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"preprint_restriction_confirmed"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-34 · 금식검사예외조건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] For patient education cards I need the fasting exception that actually appears in the lab prep guide, not what staff usually assume. Claim: water intake up to 200 mL within two hours of a lipid panel is permitted when the patient is on continuous enteric feeding under Ω-CG/24·22. Texts: Ω-CG/24·22 Article 9 (Pre-analytic Fasting) — ① Standard lipid panels require an eight-hour fast. ② Exception: patients receiving continuous enteric feeding may take plain water not exceeding two hundred (200) milliliters within two hours before draw. ③ Sweetened beverages remain prohibited in all cases. Ω-CG/24·05 Article 1 covers phlebotomy safety gear only.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EXCEPTION_WATER_200ML_ENTERIC"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-35 · 미개봉냉장유지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] How long may unopened Synthera pens stay refrigerated before the pharmacy must pull them? Claim: unopened pens remain usable in 2–8°C storage until the printed expiry month, with monthly stock rotation checks. Cold-chain audit voice log for LEAF§κ·19: Auditor: "Shelf life?" Pharmacist Kade: "Unopened pens: refrigerate 2–8°C until the carton expiry date; perform monthly rotation so earliest expiry is front. Do not freeze." LEAF§κ·19b excursion table covers room-temp openings only, not unopened shelf life.

[Assistant] <think>Unopened cold storage is to carton expiry with monthly rotation. Claim matches those leaflet lines.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"UNOPENED_FRIDGE_UNTIL_EXPIRY_PLUS_MONTHLY_ROTATION"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-36 · 기록보존 기간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
How long must the Aster Vale Civic Ledger Office retain a closed neighborhood-grant file?

Notice VELLUM/ORBIT/01-A, issued on 2038-02-14, states that a closed neighborhood-grant file remains in the civic archive for 27 years from the closure date. Schedule VELLUM/ORBIT/01-B clarifies that the count begins at closure rather than at the final payment date.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"retention_period_explicit"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-37 · 간효소검사주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] How often does the Velcorin insert want ALT/AST checked after start? Claim: baseline, then every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, then every 3 months if stable. Clinic protocol review, LEAF§κ·16: NP: "Lab cadence?" Pharmacist: "Hepatic monitoring: obtain baseline ALT/AST, repeat every 4 weeks during months 1–3, thereafter every 3 months if values remain within reference." LEAF§κ·16L lab calendar graphic matches that cadence; LEAF§κ·16x only covers bilirubin add-ons.

[Assistant] <think>Monitoring schedule in text and calendar matches baseline, q4 weeks for 3 months, then q3 months if stable.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ALT_AST_CADENCE_MATCHES_LABELED_SCHEDULE"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-38 · 누출청소절차순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] How should staff clean a Cytovex concentrate spill on the bench—what sequence? Claim: wipe with alcohol first, then water, then discard pads in regular trash. Cytotoxic spill drill audio, LEAF§κ·70: Safety lead: "Order?" Reader: "1 don double gloves and gown 2 absorb with designated chemo pads 3 wash surface with detergent solution then rinse with water 4 place waste in chemo-labeled container—not regular trash 5 remove PPE last." LEAF§κ·70b pictogram omits alcohol-first and regular trash.

[Assistant] <think>IFU requires PPE, chemo pads, detergent then water, chemo waste—not alcohol-first or regular trash. Claim sequence conflicts with stated spill steps.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"SPILL_IFU_REJECTS_ALCOHOL_FIRST_AND_REGULAR_TRASH"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-39 · 혈액검체보관기간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I am preparing a short briefing for junior nurses and need the exact retention rule so I do not misstate it. Claim under review: whole-blood specimens collected for routine chemistry under Ω-CG/24·07 must be retained at 2–8 °C for 72 hours after draw. Supporting texts: Document Ω-CG/24·07 Article 12 (Retention of Specimens) provides — ① Whole-blood chemistry specimens shall be stored at 2–8 °C. ② Minimum retention after collection is seventy-two (72) hours. ③ After the minimum period, disposal follows the biohazard schedule in Article 19. Document Ω-CG/24·11 Article 4 only addresses urine specimen labeling and does not set blood retention times.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CLAIM_MATCHES_ART12_RETENTION"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-40 · 오염사고 보고순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I heard that this five-step contamination response sequence applies to every kind of incident at the station, including biological spills, not just reagent contamination — is that scope right? Here's the excerpt I was given:

Coastal Marine Biology Station
File No. R26-016 — "Reagent Contamination Incident Response Protocol, Molecular Biology Wing"
- Scope: applies specifically to chemical reagent lot contamination events within the Molecular Biology Wing; biological and radiological spills are governed by separate protocols (R26-017, R26-011)
- Step 1: personnel who discover contamination halt use of the affected lot and isolate it in the quarantine cabinet
- Step 2: within 2 hours, notify the Lab Safety Officer via the incident hotline
- Step 3: the LSO assesses cross-contamination risk within 24 hours
- Step 4: if cross-contamination risk is confirmed, the Station Director is notified before any recall is issued to affiliated labs
- Step 5: final incident report filed with the Institutional Biosafety Committee within 10 working days

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"scope_overgeneralized_beyond_reagent_lots"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-41 · 정신건강강제입원

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I need to know whether the involuntary-hold chapter even speaks to pharmacy-initiated holds before I brief security. Claim: clinical pharmacists may independently initiate a 72-hour involuntary psychiatric hold when a patient threatens self-harm on a medical ward under Ω-CG/24·74. Evidence supplied: Ω-CG/24·74 Article 2 (Involuntary Hold Initiation) — ① A 72-hour involuntary psychiatric hold may be initiated by an attending physician or a credentialed psychiatrist. ② Nursing may place a temporary safety observation pending physician evaluation. ③ No provision authorizes pharmacists to initiate holds. Ω-CG/24·29 Article 11 describes high-alert medication double-checks and does not mention holds.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"HOLD_INITIATION_LIMITED_TO_PHYSICIAN_ROLES"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-42 · 방사선차폐의무

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I plan to correct a rumor that gonadal shields are optional for portable chest films on reproductive-age adults; does the radiation safety chapter actually ban omitting them? Claim: omission of gonadal shielding during portable chest radiography on reproductive-age adults is prohibited under Ω-CG/24·44 except when the shield would obscure diagnostic anatomy. Evidence: Ω-CG/24·44 Article 13 (Portable Radiography Shielding) — ① Gonadal shielding shall be applied for portable chest examinations of patients aged 15–50 years. ② Shielding may be omitted only when it would obscure anatomy required for the clinical indication, with reason charted. ③ Staff shall not stand in the primary beam. Ω-CG/24·06 Article 2 addresses MRI zone access and is unrelated.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SHIELDING_REQUIRED_WITH_DOCUMENTED_EXCEPTION"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-43 · 항응고제병용금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I told a family that every oral anticoagulant is banned with herbal Stelvan root extract, and I want to check whether that overstates the written rule. Claim: co-administration of any oral anticoagulant with Stelvan root extract is prohibited for all adult inpatients under Ω-CG/24·31. Evidence provided: Ω-CG/24·31 Article 14 (Antithrombotic Interactions) — ① Concurrent use of rivaroxil and Stelvan root extract is prohibited. ② Warfaril and apixal may be continued if INR or anti-Xa is checked within 48 hours of starting the extract. ③ The prohibition does not extend to parenteral heparoids. Ω-CG/24·08 Article 3 discusses diet counseling and does not list drug bans.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"BAN_LIMITED_TO_RIVAROXIL_NOT_ALL_OAC"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-44 · 개봉후폐기기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] I'm brand-new to outpatient meds—does the claim hold that opened Velmorith oral suspension must be discarded 14 days after the seal break? Claim under review: discard at day 14. From the consult transcript for LEAF§κ·14: Nurse Halla: "Dr. Corven walked us through the bottle." Dr. Corven: "Once the foil seal is broken, remaining suspension is discarded after 21 days if kept at 2–8°C; day one is the opening day." Pharmacist Reeve: "Do not freeze; the 21-day clock is in the patient tear-off." A second slip, LEAF§κ·14b, only restates the same 21-day line and bans freezing.

[Assistant] <think>Evidence sets discard at 21 days after opening at 2–8°C. Claim of day-14 discard conflicts with that stated window.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"CLAIM_ASSERTS_14D_DISCARD_BUT_LEAFLET_STATES_21D_ONLY"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-45 · 동물실험 승인권한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I'm helping a partner lab that wants to reuse this protocol — is it true that the ACUC Chair can approve a 10% increase in animal numbers for this pain-model study alone, within a few business days, without convening the full board?

Meridian Cognitive Research Institute — Animal Care & Use Committee (ACUC)
File No. R26-014 — "Amendment Approval Thresholds"
- Protocol category: Category C (moderate pain), pain-model amendments
- Minor amendment defined as: increase in animal number of 12% or less versus the originally approved cohort, with no change to pain category or procedure type
- Minor amendments may be approved by the ACUC Chair alone, without convening the full board, within 5 business days
- Amendments exceeding 12% or altering the pain category require a full board vote at the next scheduled session
- All approvals, minor or full, must be logged in the Protocol Amendment Register within 48 hours

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"chair_sole_approval_within_threshold"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-46 · 임차료지원한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I'm torn between the alley-shop track and the kiosk track — someone said the rent aid ceiling is 1.8M KRW/mo; is that right? Notes:
PNote/24·07 — rent aid. Shop floor ≤40㎡. Cap 1.2M KRW/mo. Dual-track if online sales >30%. Apply ward kiosk. Ends Q3.
PNote/24·08 — kiosk micro-grant. Max 0.4M one-shot. Not stackable with rent aid same month.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"RENT_CAP_IS_1_2M_NOT_1_8M"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-47 · 동의면제 예외조건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I'm trying to understand the exceptions here — does this retrospective-data policy permit waiving informed consent for participants whose data was originally collected as minors but who have since turned 18? Relevant excerpt below:

Bramwell Center for Behavioral Studies
File No. R26-020 — "Retrospective Data Use Protocol"
- Retrospective analysis of archived survey data (collected 2018-2023) may proceed under the original consent forms signed at time of collection
- New data-linkage projects that combine archived survey data with newly collected biometric data require fresh informed consent from all participants
- The Behavioral Studies IRB reviews all retrospective protocols annually each March

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"no_provision_on_minors_turned_adult"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-48 · 복용누락처리창

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] If a patient forgets morning Qorvexa, how late can they still take it the same day? Claim: same-day catch-up is allowed within 6 hours of the missed slot. Spoken label review, LEAF§κ·08: Counselor Mia: "Read the missed-dose strip aloud." Pharmacist Dell: "If less than 8 hours remain until the next scheduled dose, skip the missed dose; if 8 hours or more remain, take it when remembered. Do not double." Sticky margin on LEAF§κ·08z marked SUPERSEDED—DO NOT COUNSEL FROM THIS: "old 6-hour rule from pilot carton." LEAF§κ·08b patient FAQ repeats the 8-hour remainder rule only.

[Assistant] <think>Official text uses an 8-hour-until-next-dose rule. The 6-hour claim tracks only a superseded sticky the leaflet flags not to use.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"CLAIM_USES_SUPERSEDED_6H_STICKY_NOT_OFFICIAL_8H_RULE"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-49 · 용량조정우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] If eGFR falls below 30 while on daily Ulmefor, what action ranks ahead of a simple dose trim? Claim: hold the next doses and contact the prescriber before any downward titration. Nephrology med reconciliation, LEAF§κ·51: Fellow: "Low eGFR plan?" Label: "If eGFR declines below 30 mL/min/1.73m², interrupt therapy and notify the prescriber; do not independently retitrate. Restart only on written instruction." LEAF§κ·51c lab-trigger card lists the same hold-then-notify order above any dose-change table.

[Assistant] <think>Trigger language prioritizes interrupt-and-notify over independent retitration. Claim’s hold-before-trim order matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EGFR_BELOW_30_REQUIRES_HOLD_AND_PRESCRIBER_CONTACT"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-50 · 흡입기도입순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] In what order should a first-time user prime the Aerolint dry-powder inhaler before dose one? Claim: remove cap, exhale into the mouthpiece, then click-load, then inhale. Device coaching session on LEAF§κ·03: Coach: "Start over." Patient: "Cap off?" Coach reading: "Prime sequence: 1 remove cap 2 hold upright and click-load until counter shows 1 3 breathe out away from the device—never into the mouthpiece 4 seal lips and inhale strongly 5 hold breath." LEAF§κ·03p pictogram sheet uses the same five steps.

[Assistant] <think>Leaflet forbids exhaling into the mouthpiece and places click-load before the exhale-away step. Claim order and exhale-into-mouthpiece step conflict with trusted steps.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"CLAIM_USES_EXHALE_INTO_MOUTHPIECE_AGAINST_PRIME_IFU"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-51 · 공동저자 소속공개

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is an external collaborator from a partner company's R&D division required, under this policy, to disclose their employer as a separate conflict-of-interest item beyond the normal affiliation line? Excerpt below:

Fennimore Polymer Research Group
File No. R26-023 — "Authorship and Affiliation Disclosure Guidelines"
- All co-authors must disclose their current institutional affiliation in the manuscript byline
- Authors who contributed as private consultants not affiliated with any institution must state "Independent Researcher" in the affiliation line
- The corresponding author is responsible for verifying all affiliation disclosures before submission

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"coi_disclosure_for_corporate_partners_unaddressed"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-52 · 병용금기목록

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Is it true that Trelvax tablets must never be taken with oral ketoconazole? Claim: co-administration with oral ketoconazole is prohibited. Home-care visit audio transcribed against LEAF§κ·33: Patient: "Can I keep my antifungal?" Nurse Voss: "Interactions table: strong CYP3A inhibitors including oral ketoconazole are listed as contraindicated combinations." Pharmacist on call, LEAF§κ·33c: "Same table—ketoconazole oral is in the absolute avoid column; topical azoles are not listed there." A third card, LEAF§κ·33d, only covers grapefruit juice limits.

[Assistant] <think>Contraindications table explicitly bars oral ketoconazole with Trelvax. Claim matches the absolute-avoid listing.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ORAL_KETOCONAZOLE_LISTED_CONTRAINDICATED"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-53 · 동료심사 이의절차

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is it true that an appeal has to go through the Editorial Office first before being forwarded to the Independent Adjudication Panel?

Registry Entry #206/X — Consortium of Regional Academic Journals, Founding Note: The consortium was formed in 2011 to standardize peer-review practices across twelve member journals in the natural sciences.

Registry Entry #206/A — Journal Peer-Review Appeal Procedure, Article 7: An author disputing a rejection decision must (a) file a written appeal with the Editorial Office within 21 days of the decision notice; (b) the Editorial Office performs an initial completeness check; (c) only appeals that pass the completeness check are forwarded to the Independent Adjudication Panel for substantive review; (d) the Panel issues a binding ruling within 45 days.

Registry Entry #206/Y — Editorial Office Staffing Note: The Editorial Office currently operates with four full-time coordinators and two part-time assistants handling appeal intake.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"OFFICE_CHECK_PRECEDES_PANEL"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-54 · 감염폐기물분류금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Is mixing unused oral antibiotic tablets into the red sharps stream forbidden, or is that only a local habit I should stop repeating in training? Claim: placing unused oral solid antimicrobials into red sharps containers is prohibited under Ω-CG/24·48. Documents: Ω-CG/24·48 Article 10 (Pharmaceutical Waste Streams) — ① Unused oral solid antimicrobials shall be placed in the blue pharmaceutical return bin, not in red sharps containers. ② Placement of tablets or capsules into red sharps containers is prohibited. ③ Liquid cytotoxic residues follow the yellow cytotoxic pathway in Article 12. Ω-CG/24·01 Article 7 only defines color codes without product examples.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ORAL_ANTIMICROBIALS_BAN_IN_RED_SHARPS"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-55 · 동물사용 상한수치

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is the annual usage cap for this protocol 500 animals, as I noted earlier?

Registry Entry #588/G — Animal Use Protocol Ceiling Schedule, Section 2: Protocol holders approved under the Standard Tier may use no more than 350 animals per calendar year without filing an amendment request. Protocols exceeding this ceiling must undergo a full re-review by the Animal Care Oversight Committee.

Registry Entry #588/H — Animal Care Oversight Committee, Meeting Schedule: The Committee convenes on the second Tuesday of each month to review pending amendment requests.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"CEILING_IS_350_NOT_500"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-56 · 스쿨존주차예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is the school-zone curb ban waived for 10 minutes only when loading a mobility device, not for regular school pickup? Choosing drop-off spots:
PNote/24·70 — school zone curb. Stop ban 08:00–09:30 & 14:00–16:00. Exception: mobility load/unload ≤10 min with hazard lights. No exception for parent pickup queue.
PNote/24·71 — fine 80k + tow if block crosswalk. Cameras active weekdays only.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EXCEPTION_MOBILITY_LOAD_ONLY_NOT_PICKUP"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-57 · 임신중투약예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Is there any pregnancy situation where Brevora still can be continued? Claim: continuation is allowed only if the prescriber judges benefit exceeds fetal risk and no safer alternative exists, with patient consent documented. OB pharmacy desk dialogue, LEAF§κ·12: Midwife: "Absolute stop always?" Pharmacist Lian: "Pregnancy section: generally avoid; exception—continue only when treating clinician determines benefits outweigh potential fetal risk, no adequate alternative, and informed consent is recorded." LEAF§κ·12e counseling checklist mirrors those three conditions.

[Assistant] <think>Pregnancy section states the benefit-over-risk, no-alternative, documented-consent exception. Claim restates those conditions accurately.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PREGNANCY_EXCEPTION_MATCHES_THREE_STATED_CONDITIONS"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-58 · 정제분쇄금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] May nursing crush Meridex ER tablets for tube feeds? Claim: crushing is allowed because a plant QC hardness table lists fracture force. Night-shift med-pass recording, LEAF§κ·44: Nurse: "Tube patient—crush?" Pharmacist: "Do not crush, split, or chew extended-release tablets; swallow whole." Annex LEAF§κ·44q labeled MANUFACTURING QC ONLY—NOT CLINICAL USE shows hardness numbers. LEAF§κ·44b feeding-tube FAQ: "Use liquid alternative if available; do not crush ER."

[Assistant] <think>Clinical leaflet bans crushing ER tablets. Claim leans on a manufacturing QC annex marked not for clinical use, ignoring the trust boundary.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"CLAIM_RELIES_ON_QC_ANNEX_DESPITE_DO_NOT_CRUSH"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-59 · 수해피해청구기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Need a second pair of eyes: is the flood aid claim window 45 days from the water-recede notice, not from the storm date? Choosing whether to wait for a surveyor:
PNote/24·40 — flood claim. File within 45 days of official recede notice (not storm day). Photos + landlord letter. Cap 3M household.
PNote/24·41 — surveyor optional. If used, book via ward app only. Late file → auto reject, no appeal lane.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CLAIM_WINDOW_FROM_RECEDE_NOTICE_45D"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-60 · 데이터공유 승인순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Our compliance log states that the Institutional Review Board review happens before the Data Management Committee grants approval — please check this against the materials below and summarize whether that sequence holds.

Registry Entry #118/A — Cross-Institutional Research Council Charter, Preamble: The Council was established to harmonize data governance standards across member institutions and to maintain a shared repository for multi-site clinical research datasets, promoting transparency and reproducibility.

Registry Entry #118/C — Multi-Site Clinical Data Sharing Protocol, Section 4 (Approval Sequence): Before any dataset may be uploaded to the shared repository, the following sequence applies: (1) the Principal Investigator submits the data-sharing request form; (2) the Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews the request for consent compliance; (3) the Data Management Committee (DMC) grants final approval only after IRB clearance is issued; (4) the dataset is de-identified by the data curation team; (5) the de-identified dataset is uploaded to the shared platform. Issued by the Cross-Institutional Research Council, dated 2024-03-11.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"IRB_BEFORE_DMC_CONFIRMED"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-61 · 신생아선별검사주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Parents keep asking whether the second dried-blood-spot screen is due at day 14 or day 28, and I want the interval the neonatal chapter actually sets before I answer. Claim: the second dried-blood-spot metabolic screen is due on calendar day 28 of life under Ω-CG/24·52. Materials: Ω-CG/24·52 Article 6 (Newborn Metabolic Screening Schedule) — ① First dried-blood-spot specimen is collected between 24 and 48 hours of life. ② Second specimen is collected on calendar day 14 of life (±2 days). ③ Infants discharged before 24 hours receive an additional specimen at the first outpatient visit. Ω-CG/24·28 Article 3 covers hearing screening only.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"SECOND_SCREEN_DAY_14_NOT_DAY_28"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-62 · 동의철회 처리순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Please confirm — the record I have says the biospecimen is destroyed first and the participant is notified afterward. Is that the order described here?

Registry Entry #142/B — Human-Derived Material Consent Withdrawal Handling, Section 3: Upon receiving a withdrawal request, the Biobank Coordinator must (1) log the withdrawal request in the tracking ledger; (2) notify the participant in writing that the withdrawal has been logged; (3) suspend all pending analyses using the specimen; (4) destroy the physical specimen within 30 days of the written notice; (5) record destruction completion in the ledger.

Registry Entry #142/D — Biospecimen Category Definitions: Specimens are classified as Type I (blood-derived), Type II (tissue-derived), or Type III (fluid-derived) for tracking purposes.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"NOTIFICATION_PRECEDES_DESTRUCTION"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-63 · 데이터무결성 책임자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Please summarize who bears final responsibility for verifying data integrity before submission according to this policy — I have it down as the corresponding author.

Registry Entry #733/A — Editorial Standards Council, Mission Statement: The Council issues and periodically revises authorship and data-handling standards applicable to all affiliated journals.

Registry Entry #733/J — Co-Authorship Data Integrity Policy, Section 3: While all listed co-authors share responsibility for the accuracy of their own contributed data, the corresponding author holds final responsibility for verifying the integrity of the complete dataset prior to manuscript submission. Any discrepancy discovered post-submission is first escalated to the corresponding author.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CORRESPONDING_AUTHOR_CONFIRMED"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-64 · 야간공사허가요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Quick check — for a basement café reno, is night work only allowed if the ward noise desk already stamped the plan? Desk scraps I grabbed:
PNote/24·03 — night build. Work 22:00–05:00 needs prior noise desk stamp. No stamp → day-only. Neighbors within 50m get 3-day notice. Tool: pneumatic OK, pile-driver ban after 23:00.
PNote/24·11 — café fit-out. Floor drain OK. Grease trap mandatory. Night window same rule as build note above. Parking bay hold separate form.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NIGHT_WORK_REQUIRES_NOISE_DESK_STAMP"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-65 · 장애인주차갱신주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Renewal cycle for the blue placard — I was told every 2 years for temporary grade. Is that accurate while I pick between mail renew and desk walk-in?
PNote/24·90 — disability placard. Permanent grade: renew 5 years. Temporary grade: renew 1 year with doctor note. Mail OK if photo ID on file.
PNote/24·91 — lost placard reissue 12k. Vehicle plate change: update within 14 days.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"TEMP_PLACARD_RENEW_1Y_NOT_2Y"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-66 · 도로점용폐쇄권한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Road-close for a fair: can the market association self-issue a half-day close, or must traffic desk sign? Two fair layouts under review:
PNote/24·80 — temp road close. Traffic desk sole issuer. Association may apply; cannot self-issue. Close ≤6h needs 10-day lead. >6h needs police co-sign.
PNote/24·81 — sidewalk only: commerce desk OK. Barrier color yellow only. Marshals 1 per 50m.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"ASSOC_CANNOT_SELF_ISSUE_TRAFFIC_DESK_ONLY"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-67 · 공유킥보드과태료

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Shared scooter fine: is the sidewalk dump penalty 120k charged to the rider app account, not the operator? Picking which fleet to use this week:
PNote/24·120 — shared scooter park. Sidewalk block fine 40k to last rider account. Operator billed only for fleet-level hotspot after 10 tickets/week same corner.
PNote/24·121 — night ban 00:00–05:00 on river path. Helmet promo free first month.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"SIDEWALK_FINE_40K_NOT_120K"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-68 · 대피소배정확정순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Shelter A or B assignment — a neighbor said first-come walk-ins beat pre-registered seniors when beds are short. Does that match the memo?
PNote/24·99 — shelter assign. Priority when full: (1) pre-reg mobility need (2) pre-reg senior 70+ (3) pre-reg general (4) walk-in. First-come only inside same tier.
PNote/24·100 — pet-friendly wing limited; register pet in advance or go overflow school gym.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"WALKIN_LAST_TIER_NOT_ABOVE_PREREG_SENIOR"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-69 · 편의지원 발동

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Should the service desk arrange a sign-language relay when a licensing participant requests it 2 business days before the session, even if no disability certificate is attached?

Access notice VELLUM/ORBIT/17-B requires the desk to arrange a sign-language relay for a request received at least 1 business day before the session. Exception clause VELLUM/ORBIT/17-A says no disability certificate may be demanded for that request. Calendar note VELLUM/ORBIT/17-C treats 2 business days as timely.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"accommodation_trigger_matches"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-70 · 마약류처방자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Someone asserted that physician assistants with a Class-M endorsement may independently initiate Schedule II hydromoril for cancer pain; I need to verify against the controlled-substance chapter before I correct them. Claim: Class-M endorsed physician assistants may independently initiate Schedule II hydromoril for inpatient cancer pain under Ω-CG/24·70. Evidence on hand: Ω-CG/24·70 Article 9 (Controlled Prescribing Privileges) — ① Only physicians with an active institutional narcotic registry number may initiate Schedule II hydromoril. ② Class-M physician assistants may continue an already initiated hydromoril order for up to 72 hours. ③ Independent initiation by non-physician staff is prohibited. Ω-CG/24·15 Article 5 lists formulary alternatives but does not expand initiation rights.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"CLASS_M_MAY_CONTINUE_NOT_INITIATE_SII"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-71 · 동결융해 횟수한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Someone on a mailing list claimed the 3-freeze-thaw-cycle limit has applied since 2024, meaning cultures thawed back in 2025 already had to follow it. Does that line up with this policy excerpt?

Thornbury Cell Biology Repository
File No. R26-022 — "Cell Line Freeze-Thaw Cycle Policy"
- Effective under the 2026-02-01 policy revision, cell lines may undergo a maximum of 3 freeze-thaw cycles before mandatory re-derivation
- The prior policy, in force through 2026-01-31, permitted up to 5 freeze-thaw cycles
- The 3-cycle limit applies only to cultures thawed on or after 2026-02-01; cultures thawed under the earlier window remain grandfathered under the 5-cycle rule
- Re-derivation requests must be submitted to the Repository at least 10 business days before the cycle limit is reached

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"effective_date_misstated_for_cycle_limit"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-72 · 이상반응보고주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Someone told me only the manufacturer can file serious adverse events for Paldrix— is that what the insert says? Claim: serious AE reporting duty sits solely with the manufacturer, not the treating clinic. Pharmacovigilance walk-through, LEAF§κ·60: PV nurse Eli: "Who files?" Label reader: "Healthcare professionals and patients may report suspected serious adverse reactions to the national portal; the marketing authorization holder must also submit cases it becomes aware of within 15 calendar days." LEAF§κ·60b contact block lists both clinic reporting path and MAH email.

[Assistant] <think>Insert assigns reporting routes to HCPs/patients and a parallel MAH duty. Sole-manufacturer claim is contradicted.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"LEAFLET_ASSIGNS_HCP_PATIENT_AND_MAH_REPORTING_NOT_MAH_ONLY"}


학술·연구/실험 보고서/w50004-73 · 이상반응 보고책임

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Someone told me site investigators in this trial must always route adverse event reports through the Coordinating Center instead of contacting the central IRB directly, even for urgent events — can you confirm that against the chart below?

Harrowgate Clinical Research Consortium
File No. R26-021 — "Multi-Site Trial Adverse Event Reporting Chart"
- Site Investigators: report adverse events occurring at their own site to the Coordinating Center within 24 hours of becoming aware
- Coordinating Center: compiles all site reports and submits the consolidated safety report to the central IRB within 5 business days
- Sponsor's Medical Monitor reviews consolidated reports but does not independently report to the IRB
- Site Investigators are not permitted to report directly to the central IRB; all reports must route through the Coordinating Center

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"routing_rule_confirmed_no_direct_irb"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-74 · 예방접종유효기간

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Staff keep quoting different years for how long a completed Nelvira primary series stays “current” for OR credentialing; I need the date window as written. Claim: a completed Nelvira primary series remains valid for OR credentialing until 36 months after the second dose under Ω-CG/24·27. Documents: Ω-CG/24·27 Article 5 (Immunization Currency) — ① For operating-room credentialing, a completed Nelvira primary series is current for twenty-four (24) months after the date of the second dose. ② A booster administered within that window extends currency by an additional twelve months from the booster date. ③ Documentation must show lot number and administering site. Ω-CG/24·02 Article 8 only defines measles titer thresholds.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"CURRENCY_IS_24_MONTHS_NOT_36"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-75 · 재활시작기준시점

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] The claim floating in morning report is that early ambulation after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty must begin within 6 hours of leaving PACU; I need the start-time rule as printed. Claim: supervised ambulation after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty must begin within 6 hours of PACU exit under Ω-CG/24·59. Evidence: Ω-CG/24·59 Article 5 (Post-TKA Mobilization) — ① Supervised ambulation shall begin within twelve (12) hours of PACU exit for uncomplicated primary TKA. ② Bedside range-of-motion may start earlier at therapist discretion. ③ Patients with continuous nerve catheters follow Article 6 timing. Ω-CG/24·25 Article 2 discusses pre-op education videos only.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"AMBULATION_WINDOW_IS_12H_NOT_6H"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-76 · 제보처리 순서점검

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
The claim on file is that the fact-finding committee begins its inquiry before the whistleblower's identity is sealed under confidentiality protocol — does the procedure below support that order?

Registry Entry #077/A — Office of Research Integrity Oversight, Founding Note: The Office was established in 2015 to centralize handling of misconduct allegations across affiliated institutions.

Registry Entry #077/B — General Confidentiality Statement: All reports handled by the Office are subject to strict confidentiality obligations binding on all staff involved in case review.

Registry Entry #077/D — Research Misconduct Report Handling Procedure, Section 2: Upon receipt of a misconduct report, the Integrity Office must (1) seal the reporter's identity under the confidentiality protocol immediately upon intake; (2) assign a case number; (3) convene the preliminary fact-finding committee within 10 business days; (4) the committee conducts an initial inquiry without revealing the reporter's identity; (5) a formal investigation is opened if the inquiry finds sufficient grounds.

Registry Entry #077/E — Annual Case Summary: In the prior fiscal year, the Office processed 34 reports, of which 9 proceeded to formal investigation.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"IDENTITY_SEALED_BEFORE_INQUIRY"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-77 · 보고주기 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
The clerk needs to decide whether the quarterly shoreline report may move to the exception cycle after the measuring buoy is inaccessible for 2 consecutive readings; does the notice allow that?

Shoreline notice VELLUM/ORBIT/09-C sets the ordinary reporting cycle at 90 days. Exception clause VELLUM/ORBIT/09-A allows a 120-day cycle when a measuring buoy is inaccessible for at least 2 consecutive readings and the outage is logged. Form note VELLUM/ORBIT/09-B supplies the outage field.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"reporting_exception_explicit"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-78 · 복구절차 선후

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
To restore a suspended communal water token, should the field lead log the meter reading before requesting the unlock code?

Restoration notice VELLUM/ORBIT/05-D says the lead first verifies the seal. Field protocol VELLUM/ORBIT/05-A then requires the meter reading to be logged before an unlock code is requested. Code sheet VELLUM/ORBIT/05-C requires the request number in the log. Closure note VELLUM/ORBIT/05-B directs notification after the token is restored.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"restoration_order_explicit"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-79 · 동점처리 우선

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Two eligible applications have identical scores; what ordering rule should the clerk apply?

Scoring notice VELLUM/ORBIT/15-D directs the clerk to compare the earlier verified submission timestamp when scores tie. Tie note VELLUM/ORBIT/15-A sends a remaining tie to the lower ward numeral. Register guide VELLUM/ORBIT/15-C requires the comparison to be recorded. Review notice VELLUM/ORBIT/15-B confirms that eligibility must already be established.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"tie_break_rule_explicit"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-80 · 낙상보고제출기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Unit educators asked me to confirm the filing clock for unwitnessed fall reports so the slide deck matches the manual. Claim: an unwitnessed inpatient fall must have an electronic safety report filed within 4 hours of discovery under Ω-CG/24·55. Source language: Ω-CG/24·55 Article 2 (Fall Event Reporting) — ① Any unwitnessed inpatient fall shall generate an electronic safety report within four (4) hours of discovery. ② The attending of record is notified within the same window. ③ Near-miss trips without floor contact follow a 24-hour filing window under Article 3. Ω-CG/24·12 and Ω-CG/24·40 address restraint checks and mealtime assistance, respectively, and do not redefine fall filing times.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"FOUR_HOUR_FILING_MATCHES_ART2"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-81 · 노점영업시간대

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Vendor zone A vs B — a friend claims Zone A allows hot-food carts past midnight on weekdays. Confirm against the guide?
PNote/24·30 — street cart zones. Zone A: 09:00–21:00 daily, hot food OK. Zone B: 17:00–23:00, cold only after 21:00. Zone C: weekend only.
PNote/24·31 — cart size ≤1.2m width. Generator quiet-mode after 20:00 all zones.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"ZONE_A_CLOSES_21_NOT_AFTER_MIDNIGHT"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-82 · 재구성혼합순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Walk me through the order for reconstituting Heliomab IV—what comes first after wiping the vial? Claim: after swabbing, inject diluent, swirl gently, then inspect for particles before drawing the dose. Training room chatter on LEAF§κ·02: Tech Juno: "I always shook hard first." Preceptor Sol: "Printed steps: 1 swab stopper 2 inject 10 mL sterile water 3 swirl—do not shake 4 visual check for particles/discoloration 5 then withdraw." LEAF§κ·02b photo strip shows the same numbered sequence. LEAF§κ·02c only lists diluent volume confirmation.

[Assistant] <think>Numbered IFU steps match swab, inject diluent, swirl without shaking, inspect, then withdraw. Claim order aligns.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"RECONSTITUTION_SEQUENCE_MATCHES_NUMBERED_IFU"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-83 · 일일최대용량한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] What's the hard daily ceiling for oral Zyntrell 50 mg tablets in adults? Claim: adults may take up to 400 mg total per day. Floor teaching clip on LEAF§κ·27: Resident: "Max day dose?" Attending: "Authorized labeling: usual 50 mg twice daily; maximum total daily dose 150 mg." A colorful tear-off LEAF§κ·27m stamped ILLUSTRATIVE DETAILING ONLY—NOT FOR DOSING shows a 400 mg cartoon example. LEAF§κ·27c renal footnote adjusts frequency but keeps the 150 mg daily cap.

[Assistant] <think>Official max daily dose is 150 mg. The 400 mg figure comes from a detailing tear-off marked not for dosing, so trust flags were ignored.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"CLAIM_FOLLOWS_ILLUSTRATIVE_400MG_NOT_LABELED_150MG_CAP"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50004-84 · 이중경고우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] When black-box hypotension text and a bold dehydration caution both fire for Odravil, which warning ranks first? Claim: the leaflet ranks hypotension black-box above dehydration for action priority. Safety huddle tape, LEAF§κ·41: Facilitator: "Any ranking language?" Safety officer Nia: "Both warnings appear; the document states there is no head-to-head priority ranking between them and clinicians must assess both concurrently." LEAF§κ·41w only reprints both boxes side by side without order numbers.

[Assistant] <think>Evidence says no head-to-head priority ranking exists and both must be assessed. Claim invents a ranked order the text denies having evidence for.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"LEAFLET_DENIES_PRIORITY_RANKING_CLAIM_ASSERTS_ONE"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-85 · 산소요법상한수치

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] When comparing SpO2 ceilings for stable COPD on the ward versus target bands used in the ICU sepsis card, which upper limit does the COPD oxygen chapter actually set so I can explain the difference? Claim: for stable ward COPD without hypercapnic history, supplemental oxygen should keep SpO2 no higher than 92% under Ω-CG/24·63. Sources: Ω-CG/24·63 Article 4 (Ward COPD Oxygen Targets) — ① Stable COPD without prior hypercapnia: target SpO2 88–92%. ② SpO2 above 92% on supplemental oxygen requires flow reduction unless a different target is ordered. ③ Known hypercapnic patients use 88–90% per Article 5. Ω-CG/24·38 Article 9 is the ICU sepsis oxygen card and uses 94–98% for non-COPD adults.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"COPD_WARD_CAP_AT_92_PERCENT"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-86 · 수술동의책임주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] When teaching residents who must hold the consent conversation for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under local rules—operating surgeon or ward intern—I need the responsible party as written. Claim: the operating surgeon of record must personally conduct the informed-consent discussion for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under Ω-CG/24·61. Texts: Ω-CG/24·61 Article 4 (Surgical Consent) — ① For elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the operating surgeon of record shall personally conduct the consent discussion. ② A ward intern may witness signatures but shall not substitute for the discussion. ③ Telephone consent is permitted only for time-critical emergencies listed in Article 8. Ω-CG/24·17 Article 6 covers anesthesia consent separately.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SURGEON_OF_RECORD_MUST_CONDUCT_CONSENT"}


공공정책/법령·고시/w50004-87 · 긴급조달 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
When the only bridge to a clinic is closed, may the district bypass three-bid sourcing if the emergency log is filed within 6 hours?

Emergency procurement notice VELLUM/ORBIT/13-A permits one-source purchasing during an access closure when the emergency log is filed within 6 hours. Audit note VELLUM/ORBIT/13-B requires the closure record and purchase reason to be attached.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"emergency_procurement_exception"}


학술·연구/논문/w50004-88 · 예산정산 절차확인

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Where does the currency conversion audit fall relative to the partner institution's countersignature in this settlement process?

Registry Entry #319/A — Joint Research Finance Secretariat, Contact Directory: Inquiries regarding quarterly settlements should be directed to the Secretariat's finance liaison office, available Monday through Friday.

Registry Entry #319/E — International Joint-Research Budget Settlement Procedure, Section 5: At the close of each fiscal quarter, the Lead Institution's finance office must (1) compile the consolidated expenditure report; (2) route the report to the Joint Research Steering Committee for review; (3) obtain the partner institution's countersignature on the reviewed report; (4) submit the countersigned report to the funding agency's disbursement office.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_MENTION_OF_CURRENCY_AUDIT_STEP"}


공공정책/민원 안내문/w50004-89 · 경로교통소득한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Which income band still qualifies for the senior transit pass — I heard monthly gross under 2.5M works. Comparing pass vs taxi coupon:
PNote/24·50 — senior transit. Age 65+. Income: household gross ≤1.8M/mo. Pass free local bus/metro. Renew every 12 mo.
PNote/24·51 — taxi coupon alt. 20 coupons/qtr if income ≤2.2M but no free pass. Cannot hold both.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"PASS_INCOME_CAP_1_8M_NOT_2_5M"}


의료·건강/진료 지침/w50004-90 · 응급프로토콜승인자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] Which role is authorized to approve an on-shift override of the Code-Violet airway pathway—Night Charge Clinician or Duty Pulmonologist—when I explain the chain of command to the night team? Claim: only the Duty Pulmonologist may approve an on-shift override of Code-Violet under Ω-CG/24·18. Evidence: Ω-CG/24·18 Article 6 (Emergency Pathway Override) states — ① An on-shift override of Code-Violet requires written approval by the Duty Pulmonologist. ② The Night Charge Clinician may initiate the request and must document time of request. ③ Pharmacy and respiratory therapy execute only after the Duty Pulmonologist’s approval is logged. Ω-CG/24·03 Article 2 lists staffing ratios and does not assign override authority.

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"AUTHORITY_DUTY_PULMONOLOGIST_ONLY"}