개인 기록/일기·가계부·독서노트/w50006-279 · 일기 삭제 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
휴지통으로 보낸 일기 항목을 즉시 영구 삭제할 수 있는 예외가 있는지 규정 문장과 맞춰 보고 싶습니다.

서랍철/κ-21 『삭제 정책』에는 일반 삭제는 30일 휴지통 보관 후 자동 파기이며, 다만 작성자가 해당 항목에 ‘민감 표시’를 켠 경우에는 휴지통 단계에서 즉시 영구 삭제를 고를 수 있다고 이어진다. 서랍철/κ-07 『글꼴 설정』은 본문 서체만 적는다. 서랍철/κ-39 『날씨 자동기입』은 기온 필드만 다룬다.

확인 주장: 민감 표시가 켜진 항목만 휴지통에서 즉시 영구 삭제가 허용된다.

[Assistant] <think>κ-21이 민감 표시 항목에 한해 휴지통 즉시 영구 삭제를 허용한다고 적는다. 주장의 예외 조건이 문서와 맞다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CLAIM_MATCHES_DELETE_EXCEPTION"}


의료·건강/약품 설명서/w50007-1 · 소아 용량 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] 12세 미만 체중 기반 감량이 허용되는지 예외 조건만 보고 싶습니다. 약설·κ05 기록: 약사L "하르메톨 시럽, 용법 섹션." 낭독 "성인 및 15세 이상: 1회 10mL 1일 2회. 고령자 신기능 저하 시 1회 5mL로 감량 가능." 실무자M "소아 문단은 안 보이는데요."

[Assistant] <think>질문은 12세 미만 감량 예외다. 근거는 성인·15세 이상·고령자만 다루고 소아 예외를 말하지 않는다. 쟁점 미다뤄 UNSURE.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PED_DOSE_NOT_COVERED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-2 · 조례시행일자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
A colleague claims the Noise Control Amendment took effect on 1 March 2026. I need to know if that date is supportable before I put it in a handout.

Documents:

시정내규〔P26-09〕 소음관리 개정 조례
- 공포일: 2026-03-01
- 시행일: 2026-07-01
- 경과: 시행 전 접수 민원은 구법 적용

시정내규〔P26-09〕 홍보 일정
- 주민 설명회: 2026-05 중
- 안내문 배포: 시행 30일 전

시정내규〔P26-01〕 민원철 보존
- 종결 민원철 7년(참고용 인용, 시행일과 무관)

[Assistant] <think>P26-09 sets promulgation 1 Mar 2026 and effective date 1 Jul 2026. March as effective distorts the date.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"EFFECTIVE_DATE_CLAIMED_MAR_EVIDENCE_JUL"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
A representative says a score of 72 meets the access threshold. Does the rule support that number?
KITE::19::ZORA, representative chat: "A score of 72 is only a preliminary mark." KITE::19::ALVO, access rule: "The minimum qualifying score is 80."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::19::ALVO sets the minimum at 80, and KITE::19::ZORA calls 72 preliminary; the claimed threshold is numerically wrong.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"SCORE_MISMATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
A waiver note mentions a storm closure, and I suspect power loss also qualifies. Does the evidence establish that exception?
KITE::14::KORA, waiver dialogue: "The storm closure was accepted as an exception." KITE::14::LENO, review note: "The file contains no separate decision about power loss."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::14::KORA establishes an exception for storm closure, while KITE::14::LENO gives no decision about power loss.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EXCEPTION_UNCOVERED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-5 · 공용차사적이용

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Are all grades barred from any personal use of official vehicles? Claim in a manager chat: personal use of official cars is prohibited for every grade.

Evidence:

시정내규〔P26-17〕 공용차량
- 사적 이용 금지 대상: 1~4급 상당 직위
- 5급 이하: 부서장 사전 승인 시 주말 가족 행사 한정 허용(유류비 본인 부담)
- 출퇴근 전용 이용: 전 등급 금지

시정내규〔P26-17〕 승인 표
| 등급 | 사적 이용 |
| 1–4급 | 금지 |
| 5급 이하 | 조건부 허용 |

시정내규〔P26-11〕 주차장
- 적색구역 야간 금지(차량 사적 이용 규정과 별개)

[Assistant] <think>P26-17 bans personal use for grades 1–4 only. Grade 5 and below may use cars with approval. Extending the ban to every grade overgeneralizes.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"VEHICLE_PERSONAL_USE_BAN_ALL_GRADES_VS_G1_G4"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
As someone who just learned what a GPA is, is this claim safe: the Meridian Aid stipend requires a cumulative GPA of 3.80. I only have these wiki excerpts.

wk/ed-09 explains application deadlines for winter aid packages and lists required forms. Near the end, an informal staff note marked “unverified hallway summary, not committee-approved” guesses that next year’s cutoff might sit at 3.80. wk/ed-16 publishes last year’s published floor of 3.50 for the same stipend and labels that figure as the still-standing catalog rule. wk/ed-31 discusses essay length limits only.

[Assistant] <think>The 3.80 figure appears only inside an unverified hallway note on wk/ed-09. The claim states 3.80 as the requirement and ignores the trust marker and the standing 3.50 catalog rule.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"UNVERIFIED_NOTE_TREATED_AS_RULE"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
At checkout I was told the settlement sequence is receipt, approval, posting. Is that the recorded order?
KITE::10::YARO, process card: "The sequence is receipt, posting, approval." KITE::10::ZENA, clerk exchange: "Posting creates the ledger entry before approval closes the case." KITE::10::ADEL, side note: "Receipt begins the file."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::10::YARO records receipt, posting, approval, while the claim places approval before posting; the sequence does not match.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"ORDER_CONFLICT"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Before I select a provider, I assume any branch clerk can approve a dormant-account reactivation. Is that authority stated?
KITE::04::IBIS, authority rule: "Only the designated Treasury Warden may approve dormant-account reactivation." KITE::04::JORA, branch dialogue: "A clerk may assemble the packet, but cannot approve it."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::04::IBIS assigns approval to the Treasury Warden, and KITE::04::JORA limits the clerk to packet assembly; the claim conflicts.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"AUTHORITY_CONFLICT"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-9 · 규정충돌우선

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Between a city ordinance and a bureau circular on the same fee item, which controls? For a FAQ I would write: the city ordinance prevails when the two conflict.

Sources:

시정내규〔P26-16〕 규정 효력 순위
- 상위: 시 조례
- 하위: 국·과 내부 회람·지침
- 충돌 시: 조례 우선, 하위 규정은 조례 범위 내만 유효

시정내규〔P26-16〕 개정 절차
- 조례 개정: 의회 의결
- 회람 개정: 국장 전결

시정내규〔P26-21〕 재고
- 비상 물자 30일분

[Assistant] <think>P26-16 ranks ordinances above bureau circulars. On conflict, the ordinance controls. The FAQ line matches that ranking.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ORDINANCE_OUTRANKS_BUREAU_CIRCULAR"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Between a queued hardship claim and a routine correction, I think hardship goes first. Which has priority under these records?
KITE::08::TOVA, queue dialogue: "The hardship claim and routine correction entered the same queue." KITE::08::URSA, routing note: "Both items are forwarded to the review desk." KITE::08::VENA, manager log: "Disposition is recorded after review."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::08::TOVA through KITE::08::VENA mention both items and their routing, but none states an ordering rule.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PRIORITY_UNCOVERED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-11 · 외부선물수수한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can you help me confirm whether staff may keep external gifts above a set value? I plan to explain: any gift valued over 50,000 won from a non-protocol private party is prohibited, and refusal or return is required.

Rules:

시정내규〔P26-02〕 청렴·수수 금지
- 사적 이해관계자 선물: 5만 원 초과 수수 금지
- 5만 원 이하: 소속 청렴관 신고 후 수령 가능
- 반환 불가 시: 소속 기관 귀속 처리

시정내규〔P26-02〕 예외 표
| 구분 | 한도 | 비고 |
| 의전 답례품 | 3만 원 | 자매도시 등 |
| 경조사 화환 | 10만 원 | 공개 경조사만 |

시정내규〔P26-11〕 출장 여비
- 국내 출장 일비 고정액 적용
- 영수증 미첨부 항목 별도 목록

[Assistant] <think>P26-02 bars private-party gifts over 50,000 won and requires refusal or return. The claim tracks that ban.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"GIFT_BAN_THRESHOLD_MATCHES_P26_02"}


교육/위키/w50007-12 · 튜터자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Can you put the peer-tutor hiring rules into simpler words and check this claim: applicants need a B-plus or higher in the target course plus one faculty endorsement letter.

wk/ed-17 first discusses tutor pay rates. Later it states eligibility: a recorded grade of B-plus or above in the course to be tutored, and exactly one signed endorsement from a faculty member who taught that course. wk/ed-01 is an older flyer about drop-in hours only. wk/ed-44 mentions background-check timing after an offer is made.

[Assistant] <think>Eligibility on wk/ed-17 requires B-plus or higher in the target course and one faculty endorsement. That is the same pair of conditions the claim lists.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TUTOR_ELIGIBILITY_MATCHES_SOURCE"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Could you map the review order? I believe it is identity check, risk tag, then release.
KITE::03::ELOM, hallway note: "The file waits for the final review." KITE::03::FARA, desk exchange: Rian Sol said, "No release before the risk label." KITE::03::GUNN, checklist fragment: "Identity evidence is attached before routing." KITE::03::HERA, process dialogue: "The order is identity check, risk tag, then release."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::03::HERA states the same three-step order as the claim, and KITE::03::FARA also bars release before the risk label.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SEQUENCE_SUPPORTED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-14 · 외부매체반입금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Does the USB ban apply building-wide, including open-plan floors? Outreach draft says portable external storage is prohibited in every city office space.

Rules:

시정내규〔P26-15〕 외부 저장매체
- 반입·사용 금지 장소: 보안구획(Security Compartment)으로 지정된 실만
- 일반 사무실: 암호화 매체 + 정보화담당 등록 후 사용 가능
- 금지 매체 예시: 미등록 USB, 외장 HDD

시정내규〔P26-15〕 구획 표
| 구역 | USB |
| 보안구획 | 전면 금지 |
| 일반 사무실 | 등록 후 허용 |
| 민원 창구 | 등록 후 허용 |

시정내규〔P26-10〕 침해 통보
- CISO 24시간 통보(매체 금지 범위와 별개)

[Assistant] <think>P26-15 bans external media only in security compartments; registered use is allowed elsewhere. Building-wide ban overgeneralizes.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"USB_BAN_ALL_OFFICES_VS_SECURE_COMPARTMENT_ONLY"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-15 · 겸직금지범위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
For an explanatory note to newcomers: does the side-job ban cover every municipal employee without exception? Claim in circulation: all municipal employees are prohibited from any paid outside work.

Text:

시정내규〔P26-05〕 겸직·영리
- 적용: 상근 정규직 공무원만
- 금지: 사전 인사담당관 승인 없는 유급 외부 업무
- 비정규·시간선택제: 본 조 적용 제외(별도 근로계약 조항)

시정내규〔P26-05〕 승인 표
| 유형 | 승인 주체 |
| 강의·자문 | 인사담당관 |
| 영리 사업 | 본청 인사과장 |

시정내규〔P26-14〕 근무시간
- 기본 주 40시간
- 유연근무 신청 경로 명시

[Assistant] <think>The ban in P26-05 covers permanent full-time staff only. Non-regular roles are excluded. Claiming every employee overreaches that scope.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"SIDE_JOB_BAN_ALL_STAFF_VS_PERMANENT_ONLY"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-16 · 비공개녹음금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
For closed council sessions, is unauthorized audio recording prohibited? I want to tell trainees: recording a closed session without the chair’s written leave is banned for attendees and staff alike.

Clauses:

시정내규〔P26-12〕 비공개 회의 기록
- 녹음·녹화: 의장 사전 서면 허가 없으면 금지
- 적용: 참석 의원·직원·방청 모두
- 위반 시: 퇴장 및 징계·고발 검토

시정내규〔P26-12〕 공개 회의
- 일반 공개 회의 녹음: 안내 후 허용
- 생중계 별도 승인

시정내규〔P26-04〕 위원회 정수
- 11명(본 쟁점과 무관)

[Assistant] <think>P26-12 bans closed-session recording without the chair’s prior written leave. The claim aligns with that ban.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CLOSED_SESSION_RECORDING_BAN_MATCHES"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
For remote access, I believe a selfie alone satisfies the eligibility rule. Does the record allow that?
KITE::11::BELA, help-desk dialogue: "A selfie starts identity review, but it does not complete access approval." KITE::11::CORA, access rule: "Remote eligibility requires a selfie and a live verification call."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::11::CORA requires a selfie plus a live verification call, and KITE::11::BELA says the selfie alone is insufficient.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"ELIGIBILITY_CONFLICT"}


교육/위키/w50007-18 · 인턴평가주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
How frequently are credit-bearing internships evaluated? A forum post claims site supervisors file mid-term and final rubrics only. Check the career-center wiki.

wk/ed-34 describes how students log weekly hours. A gray callout marked “draft language pending senate vote — do not treat as active rule” proposes dropping all mid-term rubrics next year. The active paragraph still requires both a mid-term and a final rubric from the site supervisor. wk/ed-47 lists insurance card requirements for interns.

[Assistant] <think>Active text on wk/ed-34 still requires mid-term and final rubrics. The claim matches the active rule. No trust marker was ignored because the draft callout was not used as the basis.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"INTERNSHIP_RUBRIC_CYCLE_MATCHES"}


교육/위키/w50007-19 · 성적증명보관

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
How long does the archive keep official grade transcripts after a student graduates? Someone claimed the retention period is forty years; please judge that against the text.

wk/ed-41 is mostly about how alumni request digital copies. One paragraph states that the central archive retains sealed grade transcripts for forty years after the conferral date, then transfers a redacted index to cold storage. wk/ed-08 covers diploma reprint fees. wk/ed-33 mentions microfilm conversion schedules without changing the forty-year figure.

[Assistant] <think>wk/ed-41 explicitly sets sealed transcript retention at forty years after conferral. The claim matches that span. Fee and microfilm pages do not revise it.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TRANSCRIPT_RETENTION_MATCHES_SOURCE"}


교육/위키/w50007-20 · 기숙사서약주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
How often must residents re-sign the housing community compact? Someone insists the cycle is once each academic year before move-in. Please test that claim.

wk/ed-52, after a section on key-card replacements, states that every returning resident must re-sign the community compact once per academic year during the pre-arrival portal window. A visitor post marked “anonymous tip, unverified” claims mid-year resigning is also required; official text does not adopt that tip. wk/ed-53 only covers mattress protector inventory.

[Assistant] <think>Official line on wk/ed-52 requires one re-signature per academic year in the pre-arrival window. The claim matches that official cycle and does not rely on the unverified tip.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"COMPACT_RESIGN_CYCLE_MATCHES"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I am choosing between two cash-out routes and read the daily cap as 90 units. Which limit should I use?
KITE::02::BRIN, counter talk: Sela Quen said, "The route comparison is still open." KITE::02::CIRR, signed rule excerpt: "A customer may cash out no more than 60 units per settlement day." KITE::02::DOVI, clerk note: "Requests above the cap remain queued."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::02::CIRR sets the cap at 60 units, while the claim says 90; the stated number is distorted.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"CAP_MISMATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I am comparing renewal schedules and think the review repeats every 14 days, with notice by day 10. Is that what the minutes record?
KITE::07::RAVA, participant note: "The renewal desk meets on its regular cycle." KITE::07::SELO, meeting minutes: "Review repeats every 14 days; notice is issued by day 10 of each cycle."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::07::SELO gives both claimed values: a 14-day review cycle and notice by day 10.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CYCLE_SUPPORTED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I am comparing reserve products and calculate that the minimum reserve is 240 credits. Does the register confirm that figure?
KITE::13::HERA, product chat: "The reserve amount is listed in the register." KITE::13::IRIS, reserve register: "Minimum reserve: 240 credits." KITE::13::JUNO, clerk note: "Amounts below the floor are flagged."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::13::IRIS explicitly records a minimum reserve of 240 credits, and KITE::13::JUNO refers to that minimum as a floor.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"THRESHOLD_SUPPORTED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I am comparing two entry plans and think a buyer with a verified Silver token may enroll. Can the record confirm that eligibility?
KITE::01::AURIC, intake dialogue: Nera Voss said, "The Vellum Entry Rule accepts buyers with a verified Silver token." Ovan Pell replied, "At intake, we also attach the signed note." KITE::01::BESOM, margin note: "The note records intake; it does not replace token verification."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::01::AURIC supports enrollment for verified Silver-token buyers; the note is an intake attachment, not a contrary eligibility rule.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ELIGIBILITY_SUPPORTED"}


교육/위키/w50007-25 · 도서대출기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I am new to campus life and want to know if this claim is right: undergraduate students may keep borrowed monographs for fourteen calendar days. Please check it against the wiki pages below.

On wk/ed-03 the circulating desk policy explains that monographs checked out by undergraduates auto-renew once if no hold exists, yet the initial loan window itself is fixed at fourteen calendar days from the stamp date. A later paragraph on the same page notes that bound journals never leave the reading room. On wk/ed-11 the fines table lists late fees of two campus credits per overdue day but does not alter the base loan length. On wk/ed-19 a short sidebar describes summer-session hours for the closed stacks without mentioning loan periods.

[Assistant] <think>The claim targets the undergraduate monograph loan length. wk/ed-03 states the initial window is fourteen calendar days. That matches the claim; other pages do not contradict it.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"LOAN_WINDOW_MATCHES_WK_ED_03"}


교육/위키/w50007-26 · 온라인출석기준

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I am new to online courses. Does attendance pass if a student posts in the weekly forum at least once? Claim says yes, one forum post per week counts as present.

wk/ed-37 defines presence for asynchronous sections as completing the weekly check-in quiz, not forum activity. Forum posts are optional enrichment. wk/ed-45 shows screenshot tips for quiz submission timestamps. wk/ed-51 is a mirror of accessibility captions policy.

[Assistant] <think>wk/ed-37 defines presence via the weekly check-in quiz and treats forum posts as optional. The claim that one forum post equals presence contradicts the attendance definition and rests on no supporting line.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"FORUM_POST_NOT_ATTENDANCE_RULE"}


교육/위키/w50007-27 · 성적이의절차

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I have never appealed a grade. Please walk through the order and say if this claim is accurate: first email the instructor, then file with the department chair, then request a college review panel.

wk/ed-21 begins with calendar cutoffs. The appeals spine in the middle requires students to contact the course instructor in writing first, escalate unresolved cases to the department chair next, and only then petition the college review panel. wk/ed-39 lists panel member term lengths. wk/ed-02 duplicate redirect points back to wk/ed-21 for procedure.

[Assistant] <think>Appeals order on wk/ed-21 is instructor, then department chair, then college review panel. The claim copies that sequence without adding steps.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"APPEAL_SEQUENCE_MATCHES_WK_ED_21"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I'm choosing between two signers and assume a senior analyst may release a blocked payout without countersignature. Is that permitted?
KITE::15::MORA, training note: "Senior analysts prepare blocked-payout files." KITE::15::NURI, desk exchange: "Preparation is not release authority." KITE::15::OLEN, signed rule: "Only the Payout Director may release a blocked payout, with a countersignature."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::15::OLEN reserves release for the Payout Director with a countersignature; KITE::15::MORA limits the analyst to preparation.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"SIGNER_AUTHORITY_CONFLICT"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-29 · 용역손배책임

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
I'm preparing slides on liability—does any clause say the city must indemnify outside contractors for third-party injury on a worksite? Claim floating around: the city automatically covers contractor employee injuries.

Available text only:

시정내규〔P26-07〕 직원 과실 배상
- 적용 대상: 시 소속 직원
- 직무상 과실: 시가 1차 배상 후 구상 가능
- 고의·중과실: 개인 구상 우선 검토

시정내규〔P26-07〕 처리 순서
1) 사고 보고
2) 법무담당 사실조사
3) 배상심의

시정내규〔P26-02〕 청렴 신고
- 내부 신고 창구 운영
- 신분 비밀 유지

[Assistant] <think>Cited clauses cover city-employee fault only. Contractor indemnification is not addressed here.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_ONLY_EMPLOYEE_LIABILITY_NO_CONTRACTOR_CLAUSE"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-30 · 행정심판제기기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
If a resident files an administrative appeal after a permit denial, how many days do they have? Someone told me the window is ninety days from the denial notice. I want evidence before I repeat that.

Excerpts:

시정내규〔P26-03〕 행정심판 제기
- 제기 기간: 처분 통지일부터 60일
- 불변기간 안내문 첨부 의무
- 기간 계산: 초일 불산입

시정내규〔P26-03〕 처리 표
| 단계 | 기한 |
| 접수 확인 | 3 근무일 |
| 답변서 제출 | 20일 |
| 재결 통지 | 재결 후 7일 |

시정내규〔P26-19〕 허가 심사 체크
- 서류 보완 요구 1회
- 보완 기한 10 근무일

[Assistant] <think>P26-03 sets sixty days from notice, not ninety—date span is distorted.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"APPEAL_WINDOW_CLAIMED_90_EVIDENCE_60"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-31 · 임시출입금지해제

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
If the temporary access restriction for the east annex was posted as running through renovation, when does it lift? A walkthrough script says the ban ends on 30 April 2026 regardless of renovation status.

Documents:

시정내규〔P26-19〕 동관 임시 출입 제한
- 제한 기간: 리모델링 공사 착공일 ~ 준공 검사 완료일
- 해제 조건: 시설담당관 준공 확인 공문 게시 시점
- 예정 준공 참고일: 2026-06-15(변경 가능, 확정 해제일 아님)

시정내규〔P26-19〕 출입 표
| 신분 | 공사 중 출입 |
| 일반 민원인 | 금지 |
| 공사 관계자 | 임시출입증 |
| 긴급 공무 | 시설담당 동행 |

시정내규〔P26-03〕 행정심판 제기
- 60일(출입 제한 해제일과 무관)

[Assistant] <think>P26-19 lifts the ban only after completion-notice posting, not on a fixed 30 April date.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"ACCESS_BAN_END_CLAIMED_APR30_EVIDENCE_ON_COMPLETION"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-32 · 주차금지구역

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is it accurate that parking is banned in every municipal lot after 22:00? I heard that blanket claim and want to verify before community outreach.

Text:

시정내규〔P26-11〕 공영주차장 야간
- 주차 금지 시간(22:00–06:00): 적색구역 표지 설치된 면만
- 백색·청색 구역: 야간 주차 허용(요금 할증)
- 적색구역 정의: 소방·응급 동선 확보 구역

시정내규〔P26-11〕 표
| 구역색 | 22시 이후 |
| 적색 | 금지 |
| 백색 | 허용(할증) |
| 청색 | 허용(할증) |

시정내규〔P26-22〕 주차요금 감면
- 장애인 등록 차량 50% 감면

[Assistant] <think>Night ban applies only to red zones in P26-11, not every lot—scope is overstated.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"NIGHT_PARKING_BAN_ALL_LOTS_VS_RED_ZONE_ONLY"}


교육/위키/w50007-33 · 기숙사소음예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is it true that quiet-hour rules are waived every Friday after 22:00 for floor socials? I found these residence-life wiki fragments.

wk/ed-13 sets quiet hours from 23:00 to 08:00 on weeknights and all day before finals. A comment block labeled “student conjecture — not housing policy” claims Friday nights after 22:00 are exempt for socials. wk/ed-30 details laundry room hours. wk/ed-46 explains guest overnight registration without touching quiet-hour waivers.

[Assistant] <think>The Friday after-22:00 waiver exists only inside a student-conjecture comment, not housing policy. The claim presents it as fact and ignores the trust marker.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"CONJECTURE_TREATED_AS_QUIET_HOUR_RULE"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-34 · 수의계약금액한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Is there a sole-source dollar threshold that applies when a bureau buys software maintenance without bidding outside disaster rules? Claim to test: any software maintenance under fifteen million won may be sole-sourced.

Evidence provided:

시정내규〔P26-20〕 국내 출장 여비
- 일비: 직급 구간별 정액
- 숙박비: 실비 한도 표
- 교통비: 철도 일반실 기준

시정내규〔P26-20〕 여비 정산
| 항목 | 증빙 |
| 일비 | 불요 |
| 숙박 | 영수증 |
| 항공 | 탑승권 |

시정내규〔P26-06〕 긴급 수의계약
- 재난 선포+대응 물품+2천만 원 미만만 규정(일반 소프트웨어 유지보수 미기재)

[Assistant] <think>P26-20 only sets travel per-diem rules. P26-06 covers disaster sole-source, not software maintenance. The 15M claim is ungrounded here.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_TRAVEL_AND_DISASTER_ONLY_NO_SW_MAINT_THRESHOLD"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-35 · 청사내선거운동

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
May campaign flyers be handed out inside civic-center lobbies during local election season? I intend to explain: distribution of campaign materials inside civic-center buildings is prohibited year-round, not only near election day.

Text:

시정내규〔P26-18〕 청사 내 정치활동
- 선거운동 물품 배포·게시: 청사 건물 내부 연중 금지
- 적용 장소: 본청·구청·주민센터 로비·복도·회의실
- 외부 공개 광장: 선거관리 안내에 따름(본 조 비적용)

시정내규〔P26-18〕 위반 조치
- 즉시 회수·퇴거 요청
- 반복 시 관할 선관위 통보

시정내규〔P26-09〕 소음 조례 시행일
- 2026-07-01(본 금지와 무관)

[Assistant] <think>P26-18 forbids year-round indoor distribution of campaign materials—claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"INDOOR_CAMPAIGN_MATERIAL_BAN_YEAR_ROUND"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
My broker says any account with a green tag qualifies for the premium window; I want to know whether a second signer is also required.
KITE::09::WIRA, broker call: "The green tag starts the premium-window review." KITE::09::XARO, access rule dialogue: "Eligibility requires the green tag and a second signer on the authorization card."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::09::XARO requires both the green tag and a second signer, matching the question's concern about the additional eligibility condition.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DUAL_REQUIREMENT_SUPPORTED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
My notes say the audit copy is held for 36 months. Is that the stated retention period?
KITE::17::TARO, archive dialogue: "The audit copy stays in the controlled archive." KITE::17::URON, retention rule: "Keep each audit copy for 18 months from closure."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::17::URON specifies 18 months from closure, not the claimed 36 months; the retention number is distorted.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"RETENTION_MISMATCH"}


여행·생활/안내문·시간표/w50007-38 · 도선 시간표 공지기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
OO도선 정기 시간표 변경 절차와 관련해, 시간표를 변경할 때는 최소 7일 전에 선착장 게시판에 공지하도록 되어 있던데, 이대로 처리하면 되는지 판단 부탁드립니다.

[공지문] OO도선 시간표 변경 안내(생활안내 제26-06호)
- 동절기(12~2월) 운항시간 단축 적용
- 정기 시간표 변경 시 최소 7일 전 선착장 게시판 공지
- 기상 악화에 따른 결항은 당일 공지 가능

[시간표] 동절기 운항표
- 첫배 07:30 / 막배 17:00(하절기 대비 1시간 단축)

[결항기준 안내]
- 파고 2m 이상 시 결항

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"notice_period_7days_match"}


여행·생활/안내문·시간표/w50007-39 · 주차장 운영 절차순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
OO벚꽃축제 임시주차장 운영요원 안내와 관련해, 만차가 되면 우선 안내요원이 철수하고 그다음 예비주차장 우회 안내를 진행하는 순서로 되어 있는데 사실인지 검증해주세요.

[운영지침] 임시주차장 운영요원 안내(생활안내 제26-08호)
1. 주차장 진입 차량 안내요원 배치
2. 만차 시 인근 예비주차장으로 우회 안내
3. 행사 종료 후 주차요금 정산 및 마감 보고
4. 정산 마감 보고 완료 후 안내요원 철수

[배치도 안내]
- 본주차장 A구역, 예비주차장 B구역 위치 표시

[정산안내]
- 정산 담당자 2인 이상 입회

[철수기준 안내]
- 마감 보고서 제출 전 임의 철수 금지

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"step_order_reversed"}


여행·생활/안내문·시간표/w50007-40 · 캠핑장 취소 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
OO생태캠핑장 예약 규정 중, 우천특보가 발령된 경우에는 취소 수수료가 예외적으로 전액 면제된다고 되어 있는데 맞는지 확인해달라.

[예약안내] OO생태캠핑장 예약안내(생활안내 제26-05호)
- 예약은 이용일 30일 전부터 가능
- 우천특보 발령 시 예약 취소 수수료 전액 면제(예외)
- 단순 변심에 의한 취소는 이용일 3일 이내 수수료 20% 부과

[수수료표] 취소 시점별 수수료
- 이용일 4일 전까지 취소: 수수료 없음
- 이용일 3일 이내 취소: 20%
- 우천특보 발령 취소: 0%(면제)

[Assistant] {"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"rain_advisory_fee_waiver_match"}


여행·생활/안내문·시간표/w50007-41 · 회원권 해지 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
OO온천리조트 회원권과 관련해, 이사나 해외 이주로 인한 중도 해지는 예외 사유에 해당하지 않아 위약금 20%가 그대로 부과된다고 되어 있는데, 이 부분이 사실인지 가려주세요.

[약관] 온천리조트 회원권 해지 안내(생활안내 제26-03호, 외부 반출 금지)
- 일반 해지: 가입 후 1년 경과 시 위약금 없이 해지 가능
- 중도 해지(1년 미만): 위약금 20% 부과
- 예외: 이사·해외 이주 등 객관적 사유 증빙 시 중도 해지 위약금 면제

[해지절차 안내] 신청 순서
- 해지신청서 작성 → 증빙서류 제출 → 심사 후 승인

[내부 메모] 심사 관련
- 증빙서류 위조 의심 시 회원관리팀에 별도 보고

[Assistant] {"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"exception_applicability_reversed"}


여행·생활/안내문·시간표/w50007-42 · 펜션 반려동물 예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
OO펜션 반려동물 동반과 관련하여, 장애인 보조견은 체중 제한과 무관하게 동반이 허용되는 예외 조항이 있는지 알고 싶습니다.

[이용안내문] OO펜션 이용안내(생활안내 제26-04호)
- 반려동물은 소형견(체중 7kg 미만)에 한해 동반 가능
- 동반 시 사전 예약 페이지에서 반려동물 등록 필수
- 공용공간 출입 시 목줄 착용 의무

[등록절차 안내] 반려동물 등록 방법
- 예약 완료 후 3일 이내 품종·체중 정보 등록
- 등록 누락 시 현장 동반 불가

[Assistant] {"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"no_mention_service_dog_exception"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
One offer says late evidence is always rejected; I read a verified outage lasting up to 2 days as an exception. Does the record support that reading?
KITE::05::KARO, customer call: "Late evidence usually closes the file." KITE::05::LUMA, exception rule: "If a service outage is logged and verified, evidence arriving within 2 days after cutoff may be accepted." KITE::05::MERA, clerk note: "The outage log must accompany the late submission."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::05::LUMA explicitly permits verified outage evidence within 2 days, while KITE::05::MERA adds the required log.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EXCEPTION_SUPPORTED"}


교육/위키/w50007-44 · 과제지각예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Please help me understand late-work exceptions for studio courses. Claim: instructors must accept work up to seventy-two hours late after a documented campus network outage. Here is everything I could paste.

wk/ed-15 discusses how studio critique sessions are scheduled and how peer feedback forms are filed. wk/ed-29 describes the color-coding of project lockers. Neither page mentions network outages, grace windows, or mandatory acceptance of late submissions.

[Assistant] <think>The claim concerns mandatory late acceptance after network outages. The provided pages only cover critique scheduling and locker colors. They never address late-work exceptions, so the issue is out of range of the evidence.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SOURCES_SILENT_ON_LATE_EXCEPTIONS"}


교육/위키/w50007-45 · 실험실안전순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Please summarize what order a first-time student must follow before entering the wet lab, and tell me whether this claim matches the wiki: orientation module, then goggle-fit quiz, then badge scan at the door.

wk/ed-14 opens with equipment inventory rules for the cold room. Midway, the safety spine states that every new worker finishes the three-hour orientation module online, next sits the timed goggle-fit quiz at the prep desk, and only after a passing score may the door badge activate. wk/ed-05 adds that failed quiz attempts may be retaken the same afternoon. wk/ed-28 covers chemical waste labels and does not reorder the entry steps.

[Assistant] <think>Entry sequence is stated mid-page on wk/ed-14: orientation, then goggle-fit quiz, then badge activation. The claim restates that order exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"LAB_ENTRY_ORDER_MATCHES_WK_ED_14"}


교육/위키/w50007-46 · 학점인정한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Summarize the transfer-credit ceiling for incoming community-college coursework and judge this claim: at most thirty semester hours may count toward the bachelor’s degree.

wk/ed-26 first reviews syllabus-equivalence review fees. The numeric rule follows: community-college transfer credit applied to a bachelor’s program is capped at thirty semester hours, excluding military training blocks handled separately. wk/ed-40 explains how AP scores convert. wk/ed-49 notes that summer courses taken after matriculation still count against the same thirty-hour community-college cap.

[Assistant] <think>wk/ed-26 sets a thirty semester-hour cap on community-college transfer credit toward the bachelor’s. wk/ed-49 reaffirms the same cap. Claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"TRANSFER_CAP_MATCHES_SOURCES"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-47 · 재난시수의계약

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Suppose the mayor declares a municipal disaster. May procurement skip competitive bidding for urgent supplies under twenty million won? Claim: yes, when a disaster declaration is in force and the purchase is for response goods under that amount.

Evidence:

시정내규〔P26-06〕 긴급 수의계약
- 요건 동시 충족: 시장 재난 선포 유효 + 대응 물품·용역
- 금액 한도: 건당 2천만 원 미만
- 사후: 14일 내 계약심사위에 사유서

시정내규〔P26-06〕 일반 구매
- 2천만 원 이상: 전자입찰 원칙
- 분할 발주 금지 명시

시정내규〔P26-21〕 창고 재고
- 비상 물자 최소 재고 일수 30일

[Assistant] <think>P26-06 needs active disaster declaration, response goods, and under 20M won. The claim meets all three.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DISASTER_SOLE_SOURCE_EXCEPTION_MATCHES"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
The brochures mention a notice window, and I think it ends on 5 May 2034. Which deadline applies?
KITE::20::BORA, brochure dialogue: "The notice window ends on 5 May 2034." KITE::20::CADO, comparison sheet: "The notice window ends on 8 May 2034." KITE::20::DENA, customer note: "The two brochures were not reconciled." KITE::20::EORA, review transcript: "No final deadline was selected."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::20::BORA and KITE::20::CADO give different dates, while KITE::20::DENA and KITE::20::EORA record no reconciliation.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CONFLICTING_DEADLINES"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
The desk told me I may split one rebate request into three same-day submissions. Can I rely on that?
KITE::06::NOVA, sales chat: "Separate submissions might speed review." KITE::06::ORIN, routing memo: "The request is tracked under one customer record." KITE::06::PAVA, audit remark: "Duplicate entries are merged before review." KITE::06::QIRA, signed rule: "One rebate request per customer per day; splitting a request is prohibited."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::06::QIRA permits one request per customer per day and expressly prohibits splitting; the three-submission claim conflicts.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"PROHIBITED_SPLIT"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
The sales call says resale of a trial allocation is barred; I want to confirm that a transfer to an affiliated desk is still prohibited.
KITE::16::PIRA, sales call: "Trial allocations cannot be resold." KITE::16::QENO, transfer rule: "No trial allocation may be transferred to any third party, including an affiliated desk." KITE::16::RILO, operations chat: "Affiliate transfers are routed back for review." KITE::16::SAVA, note: "The restriction remains active during review."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::16::QENO expressly includes an affiliated desk among prohibited third-party transfers, confirming the stated restriction.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PROHIBITION_SUPPORTED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Two speakers disagree about who carries loss after an unlogged handoff. I think the receiving desk owns it; what does the record assign?
KITE::12::DARA, call transcript: "The handoff was accepted without a log." KITE::12::ELVA, desk note: "The sending desk disputes ownership." KITE::12::FENO, responsibility rule: "The receiving desk owns the loss once it accepts an unlogged handoff." KITE::12::GARO, supervisor remark: "Record the receiving desk as owner."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::12::FENO assigns loss to the receiving desk after acceptance of an unlogged handoff; KITE::12::GARO repeats that assignment.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"RESPONSIBILITY_SUPPORTED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-52 · 징계절차순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Walk me through the sequence for formal discipline so I can draw a simple flowchart. Claimed order: investigation report, then hearing notice, then hearing, then sanction decision.

Source bullets:

시정내규〔P26-08〕 징계 절차 순서(변경 불가)
1. 조사보고서 확정
2. 청문 통지
3. 청문 실시
4. 징계의결
5. 처분 통보

시정내규〔P26-08〕 기한 표
| 단계 | 상한 |
| 청문 통지→청문 | 10 근무일 |
| 청문→의결 | 15 근무일 |

시정내규〔P26-15〕 포상
- 모범 직원 분기 추천
- 포상금 예산 과목 별도

[Assistant] <think>P26-08 orders report, hearing notice, hearing, then sanction decision. The claim follows that list. Reward rules are irrelevant.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DISCIPLINE_STEP_ORDER_MATCHES_P26_08"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-53 · 위원회위원자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
What does the rule say about who may sit on the Civic Oversight Committee? For a public explainer I would state: members must be city residents aged 25 or older with no concurrent paid city contract.

Clauses:

시정내규〔P26-04〕 시민주권위원회 자격
- 연령: 만 25세 이상
- 거소: 시 관내 주민등록
- 결격: 시와 유상 용역·공사 계약 중이면 임명 불가

시정내규〔P26-04〕 구성
- 위원 정수 11명
- 임기 2년, 한 차례 연임 가능

시정내규〔P26-07〕 회의 공개
- 정기회의 월 1회
- 회의록 14일 내 게시

[Assistant] <think>P26-04 requires age 25+, city residency, and no concurrent paid city contract—claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"COMMITTEE_ELIGIBILITY_MATCHES_P26_04"}


교육/위키/w50007-54 · 와이파이대역한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
What is the per-device upload cap on the student residence Wi-Fi? I was told the limit is eight megabits per second; please confirm from these notes.

wk/ed-06 opens with SSID naming conventions. Deeper in the same article, the residential network table sets a soft upload ceiling of eight megabits per second per associated device during peak evening hours. wk/ed-20 covers guest voucher codes. wk/ed-35 explains VPN access for research clusters without changing the residential upload figure.

[Assistant] <think>Residential upload ceiling of eight megabits per second appears in the network table on wk/ed-06. Guest and VPN pages leave that figure untouched. Claim aligns.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"UPLOAD_CAP_MATCHES_WK_ED_06"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
When an appeal is filed, I read the sequence as intake, panel notice, then evidence lock. Is that sequence fixed?
KITE::18::VELA, appeal procedure: "After filing, intake is recorded, the panel is notified, and evidence is locked." KITE::18::WEXA, panel dialogue: "Notice follows intake." KITE::18::YUMA, evidence note: "The lock is applied after panel notice."

[Assistant] <think>KITE::18::VELA states intake, panel notice, then evidence lock; KITE::18::WEXA and KITE::18::YUMA confirm the order.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"APPEAL_SEQUENCE_SUPPORTED"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-56 · 인사기록이관

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
When must personnel files of retired staff move to the records archive? A draft memo says transfer by 31 March of the third year after retirement. Please check against the rule text.

Excerpts:

시정내규〔P26-13〕 인사기록 이관
- 이관 시한: 퇴직 연도의 다음 해부터 기산하여 5년째 해의 3월 31일까지
- 예시 표기: 2021년 퇴직 → 2026-03-31까지
- 이관 전 열람: 본인·법정신청만

시정내규〔P26-13〕 보존
| 기록 | 보존 |
| 인사기록 원본 | 이관 후 영구(기록관) |
| 부서 사본 | 이관 후 폐기 |

시정내규〔P26-05〕 겸직
- 상근 정규직 승인 절차(이관 기한과 무관)

[Assistant] <think>P26-13 requires transfer by 31 March of the fifth counted year. The 2021→2026 example confirms it. A third-year deadline distorts that date.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"ARCHIVE_TRANSFER_YEAR_CLAIMED_3_EVIDENCE_5"}


교육/위키/w50007-57 · 증명서발급기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
When should a paper enrollment certificate arrive after I request it at the counter? Claim: paper certificates always print within one business day. My notes are incomplete.

wk/ed-43 explains fee waivers for digital PDF certificates and the portal download button. wk/ed-50 describes postal tracking for diplomas mailed abroad. Neither page states a service-level target for counter-issued paper enrollment certificates.

[Assistant] <think>Claim asserts a one-business-day print window for paper enrollment certificates. Sources discuss digital PDF fees and diploma mailing only. The counter SLA is not covered, so the evidence range does not reach the claim.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_PAPER_CERTIFICATE_SLA_IN_SOURCES"}


교육/위키/w50007-58 · 현장학습책임자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Who carries liability sign-off for overnight field trips? Claim: the department safety officer must countersign every overnight roster. I only have these pages.

wk/ed-32 catalogs bus vendor contracts and meal stipend rates for day trips. wk/ed-48 describes how students pack packing lists for geology outings. Nothing in either article names a safety officer, countersignature, or overnight roster authority.

[Assistant] <think>The claim asks who countersigns overnight rosters. Evidence discusses vendors, stipends, and packing lists only. Responsibility for overnight sign-off is not addressed, so a verdict on the claim cannot be grounded.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_OVERNIGHT_AUTHORITY_CONTENT"}


교육/위키/w50007-59 · 휴학승인주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Who is actually allowed to approve a one-semester leave of absence? A classmate claims the dorm resident advisor can sign it. Below are the only wiki pages I found.

wk/ed-12 outlines the leave form fields and medical-document upload steps. A sidebar tagged “rumor log — not policy” says some students once got a resident advisor to initial a draft form. wk/ed-27 assigns final leave signatures to the college dean of studies only. wk/ed-04 is about parking permits during leave and is silent on approvers.

[Assistant] <think>Policy on wk/ed-27 names the dean of studies as sole final signer. The RA claim rests on a rumor-log sidebar; treating that as authority ignores the trust label.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"RUMOR_LOG_USED_OVER_DEAN_RULE"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-60 · 침해통보주체

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Who is required to issue the first external notice after a confirmed personal-data breach in a district system? Draft line: the bureau CISO must notify the municipal privacy office within twenty-four hours; the mayor is not the first notifier.

Rules:

시정내규〔P26-10〕 개인정보 침해 통보
- 1차 외부 통보 주체: 소관 국 CISO
- 수신: 시 개인정보보호담당관
- 시한: 확인 시점부터 24시간 이내
- 시장 명의 대외 발표: 보호담당관 검토 후 별도

시정내규〔P26-10〕 내부 보고 표
| 단계 | 주체 |
| 탐지 | 시스템 관리자 |
| 확정 | CISO |
| 시 통보 | CISO |

시정내규〔P26-18〕 백업
- 일 단위 증분 백업

[Assistant] <think>P26-10 assigns the bureau CISO as first notifier within 24 hours—claim matches.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"BREACH_FIRST_NOTIFIER_IS_BUREAU_CISO"}


공공/사규·규정/w50007-61 · 재택근무자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User]
Would three years of continuous service alone qualify someone for standing telework? Claim I was asked to validate: any employee with three years’ tenure may enroll in standing telework.

Only these passages were supplied:

시정내규〔P26-14〕 연차 발생
- 1년 미만: 월 1일 비례
- 1년 이상: 15일 기본
- 3년 이상: 가산 일수 표 적용

시정내규〔P26-14〕 연차 사용 촉진
- 미사용 연차 통보 시기: 매년 9월
- 강제 사용 지정권: 부서장

시정내규〔P26-08〕 징계 절차 순서
- 조사→청문 통지→청문→의결

[Assistant] <think>Supplied text only covers leave accrual and discipline order, not telework eligibility.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"EVIDENCE_LEAVE_ONLY_NO_TELEWORK_ELIGIBILITY"}


유통/회의록/w50007-62 · 우수협력사자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"A supplier rep is pushing to get bumped up to preferred-vendor status this quarter -- before I forward the request, remind me, do they actually need three consecutive quarters of on-time delivery above 95%, or is that not one of the qualifying conditions?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-31차 매입협력사회의록-1","text":"Article 6 (Preferred Vendor Qualification) ① A supplier becomes eligible for preferred-vendor tier upon maintaining an on-time delivery rate of 95% or higher for three consecutive fiscal quarters. ② Eligible suppliers must also have zero unresolved quality complaints during the qualifying period."},{"document_id":"제26-31차 매입협력사회의록-2","text":"Article 14 (Warehouse Storage Allocation) ① Pallet storage space is assigned on a first-come, first-served basis during peak season."},{"document_id":"제26-31차 매입협력사회의록-3","text":"Article 2 (Vendor Meeting Schedule) ① Quarterly vendor review meetings are held on the second Tuesday of each quarter."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §1 sets the preferred-vendor bar at 95%+ on-time delivery for three consecutive quarters, exactly matching the claim.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"preferred_vendor_threshold_confirmed"}


법률·계약/이용약관/w50007-63 · AI베타참여조건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"AI 베타 기능을 쓰려면 어떤 조건을 충족해야 하는지 알려줘.","documents":[{"document_id":"편철·UT20-a","text":"일반 채팅 이력 90일 보관."},{"document_id":"편철·UT20-b","text":"파일 업로드 단건 25MB."},{"document_id":"편철·UT20-c","text":"커뮤니티 가이드 위반 시 게시 제한."}]}

[Assistant] <think>AI 베타 참여 조건이 조각에 없다. 미기재 쟁점이라 기권만 한다.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SCOPE_ABSENT_BETA"}


제품 사용/FAQ·보증약관/w50007-64 · AS접수 처리순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"AS 접수할 때 현장 직원이 따라야 할 처리 순서를 근거 기준으로 확인해 달라.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/04-가","text":"헬리오스 공기청정기 AS는 먼저 시리얼과 구매 증빙을 확인하고, 이어서 증상 코드를 입력한 뒤, 마지막으로 방문·택배 회수 중 회수 방식을 확정한다. 순서를 건너뛰면 접수 번호가 발급되지 않는다."},{"document_id":"PX보/04-나","text":"증상 코드 목록은 분기마다 개정되며, 구버전 코드로 접수하면 센터에서 재분류 요청이 발생할 수 있다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/04-가는 시리얼·증빙 확인 → 증상 코드 입력 → 회수 방식 확정 순을 강제한다. 질의에 대한 절차 순서 주장은 이 세 단계와 일치한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ORDER_MATCH"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-65 · 중대이상반응 보고책임

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Based on PB-CT-031.R2, is it correct that the site Principal Investigator must submit the initial SAE report to the IRB within 24 hours of becoming aware of the event, while headquarters' Clinical Trial Safety Officer handles the 7-day follow-up report?","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-CT-031.R2","text":"Upon becoming aware of a Serious Adverse Event, the Principal Investigator at the trial site is responsible for submitting the initial SAE report to the Institutional Review Board within 24 hours of first knowledge. The Clinical Trial Safety Officer at headquarters is responsible for the subsequent follow-up report within 7 days."},{"document_id":"PB-RA-011.R1","text":"Any change to product labeling that affects the approved indication must be filed with the Regulatory Affairs department at least 60 days before the intended implementation date, accompanied by supporting clinical justification."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-CT-031.R2 gives the site PI the 24-hour initial SAE report and the headquarters Safety Officer the 7-day follow-up, matching the claim.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PB_CT_031_SAE_INITIAL_REPORT_ROLE_MATCH"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-66 · 프로토콜 개정 승인순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Before we submit the amended protocol to the ethics committee, please double check: our current draft has the Sponsor's Medical Director approve the amendment first, followed by internal Regulatory Affairs review, and only then submission to the IRB - is that the correct order?","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-CT-040.R1","text":"Any amendment to an approved clinical trial protocol must first be reviewed and approved by the Sponsor's Medical Director. Following Medical Director approval, the amendment shall be reviewed by the Regulatory Affairs department for compliance with applicable regulations. Only after both approvals are obtained may the amended protocol be submitted to the Institutional Review Board for final review."},{"document_id":"PB-HR-010.R2","text":"Annual refresher training on Good Clinical Practice is mandatory for all clinical operations staff and must be completed by the end of Q1 each year."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-CT-040.R1 orders Medical Director approval, then Regulatory Affairs review, then IRB submission, exactly matching the proposed sequence.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PB_CT_040_PROTOCOL_AMENDMENT_ORDER_MATCH"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-67 · CRA 자격요건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Does PB-CT-008.R4 confirm that a CRA candidate needs a life-science bachelor's degree, at least 12 months of supervised monitoring experience, and a GCP certificate valid within the last 2 years?","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-CT-008.R4","text":"To be appointed as a Clinical Research Associate for monitoring visits, an individual must hold at least a bachelor's degree in a life-science-related field and have completed a minimum of 12 months of documented on-the-job monitoring experience under senior CRA supervision, in addition to holding a valid Good Clinical Practice training certificate issued within the preceding 2 years."},{"document_id":"PB-RA-002.R1","text":"Regulatory submission documents must be retained for a minimum of 15 years following product discontinuation, in either physical or validated electronic archive format."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-CT-008.R4 requires a life-science bachelor's degree, 12 months supervised experience, and a GCP certificate within 2 years, matching the claim.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PB_CT_008_CRA_QUALIFICATION_MATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Doing our annual site environmental review — for the new Bay 7 extension that opened this spring, who's tasked with segregating hazardous solvent waste over there? Need it for our checklist.","documents":[{"document_id":"EV-25.060-R1","text":"General Recycling Policy: Cardboard, scrap metal, and pallet wrap are segregated into color-coded bins located at each bay exit and collected weekly by the site recycling contractor."},{"document_id":"EV-25.058-R1","text":"Waste Management SOP: In Bays 1 through 6, the Production Technician on shift is responsible for segregating hazardous solvent waste into the labeled red drums before end-of-shift handoff to the Environmental Health and Safety team."}]}

[Assistant] <think>EV-25.058-R1 only assigns solvent-waste segregation duty for Bays 1–6; Bay 7 extension isn't mentioned in either document.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"BAY7_SCOPE_NOT_ADDRESSED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Drafting the training manual for the new hires on the 400-ton press — I have the changeover order as lockout the press, pull the die set, clean the tooling bed, install the new die, run three calibration shots, then release to production. Does that match your SOP sequence?","documents":[{"document_id":"PP-25.006-R1","text":"PPE for Tooling Changeover: Cut-resistant gloves and face shields are required during die handling operations."},{"document_id":"MT-25.045-R1","text":"Maintenance Log Format SOP: Changeover events must be logged in the CMMS within 24 hours, noting technician name, duration, and any anomalies."},{"document_id":"PR-25.022-R1","text":"Line Changeover SOP: Changeover on the 400-ton press follows this sequence: (1) lockout/tagout the press, (2) remove the current die set, (3) clean the tooling bed, (4) install the new die set, (5) run three calibration shots, (6) release the line to production."},{"document_id":"QM-25.002-R1","text":"Quality Manual Overview: Kestrel Alloy Manufacturing operates an integrated quality management system across all plants, covering document control, training records, and internal audit scheduling."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PR-25.022-R1 lists lockout, remove die, clean bed, install die, three calibration shots, then release. That's the same six-step order in the draft.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SEQUENCE_MATCHES_SOP"}


유통/회의록/w50007-70 · 고객민원처리우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"During the holiday rush, I've been telling my team to always bump VIP members to the front of the complaint line ahead of anyone else waiting -- that's the priority order laid out for us, correct?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-17차 고객서비스회의록-1","text":"Article 6 (Complaint Handling Priority) ① Complaints shall be handled strictly in order of arrival time, regardless of membership tier. ② Store staff are prohibited from reordering the queue based on customer status, including VIP membership."},{"document_id":"제26-17차 고객서비스회의록-2","text":"Article 2 (Complaint Log Retention) ① Written complaint records shall be retained for 12 months before disposal."},{"document_id":"제26-17차 고객서비스회의록-3","text":"Article 9 (VIP Lounge Access Hours) ① The VIP lounge is accessible from 11:00 to 20:00 for members with gold-tier status or higher."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §1-2 mandate strict arrival-order handling and explicitly prohibit reordering by membership status, directly contradicting the VIP-first claim.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"queue_priority_rule_overridden"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-71 · 완제품 출하승인순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"During this week's shipment prep, the packaging line lead released Batch VB-2291 to the distribution warehouse right after the QC Manager signed the batch record, planning to have the Quality Assurance Director countersign afterward. Please check whether this sequence matches procedure.","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-QA-017.R2","text":"Finished product shall not be transferred to the distribution warehouse until the Quality Assurance Director has countersigned the batch release record following the QC Manager's initial sign-off. Only after both signatures are obtained on the batch record may the packaging line proceed with warehouse transfer."},{"document_id":"PB-HR-014.R1","text":"Employee badge access to the finished goods warehouse is granted only after completion of the annual security awareness training module."},{"document_id":"PB-QC-005.R1","text":"Analytical balances and pH meters used in the finished product testing laboratory shall undergo daily performance verification prior to use."},{"document_id":"PB-RA-009.R1","text":"Post-approval changes to the manufacturing process that affect critical quality attributes must be submitted as a variation to the health authority prior to implementation."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-QA-017.R2 requires QA Director countersignature before warehouse transfer, but the batch moved beforehand - the sequence is reversed.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"PB_QA_017_RELEASE_SIGNOFF_SEQUENCE_MISMATCH"}


제품 사용/사용자 매뉴얼/w50007-72 · 오류조치우선

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"E-12와 E-04가 동시에 떴을 때 어떤 순서로 조치해야 하는지, 전원 차단이 우선인지 고객 문의로 접수합니다.","documents":[{"document_id":"PXU·08§N12","text":"· 동시 오류 우선순위\n  1순위: E-12(과열) → 즉시 전원 차단\n  2순위: E-04(센서 통신) → 전원 복구 후 재연결\n· E-12 존재 시 다른 코드 진단 보류"},{"document_id":"PXU·08§N02","text":"· 오류 표시: 전면 주황 점멸 + 앱 푸시"},{"document_id":"PXU·08§N08","text":"· E-04 단독 시\n  - 케이블 재삽입\n  - 60초 대기 후 재시도"}]}

[Assistant] <think>N12는 동시 오류 시 E-12 전원 차단이 1순위라고 적는다. 전원 차단 우선 주장과 부합.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PRIORITY_MATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"FAQ에는 당일 방문 점검이 된다고 되어 있으니, 약관과 달라도 FAQ대로 당일 점검을 약속해도 된다고 본다.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/10-가","text":"신뢰 순위 조항: 서면 보증약관이 FAQ·채팅 안내보다 우선한다. 상호 충돌 시 약관 문장을 확정 기준으로 삼고 FAQ는 참고용으로만 사용한다."},{"document_id":"PX보/10-나","text":"FAQ 요약: 일부 거점에서는 당일 방문 점검이 가능할 수 있다고 안내한다."},{"document_id":"PX보/10-다","text":"보증약관: 방문 점검은 접수 완료 후 最短 익일부터 스케줄링하며, 당일 방문은 운영하지 않는다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/10-가가 약관을 FAQ보다 우선한다고 못 박고, PX보/10-다는 당일 방문을 배제한다. 질의는 하위 FAQ만 따르므로 신뢰 순위를  Ignored 한 실패다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"FAQ_OVER_TERMS"}


유통/회의록/w50007-74 · 협력사대금지급기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Finance keeps asking whether Tier-1 suppliers get paid within 30 days while Tier-2 suppliers wait 45 -- is that split actually what's on the books, or did the terms get standardized?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-08차 대금결제회의록-1","text":"Article 3 (Supplier Payment Terms) ① Tier-1 suppliers, defined as those with annual transaction volume exceeding 1 billion KRW, shall be paid within 30 days of invoice receipt. ② Tier-2 suppliers shall be paid within 45 days of invoice receipt."},{"document_id":"제26-08차 대금결제회의록-2","text":"Article 7 (Invoice Submission Format) ① All supplier invoices must be submitted in electronic format via the vendor portal."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §1 sets Tier-1 at 30 days and §2 sets Tier-2 at 45 days. Both figures match the claim's split exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"tiered_payment_terms_confirmed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"For our surveillance audit checklist we noted your Class II vessels in Plant 3 get inspected monthly — want to verify that's still accurate before we lock in the audit plan.","documents":[{"document_id":"PV-25.020-R1","text":"Pressure Vessel Classification SOP: Vessels are classified Class I, II, or III based on operating pressure and volume, per the criteria table in Appendix A."},{"document_id":"PV-25.047-R2","text":"Pressure Vessel Inspection SOP: All Class II pressure vessels in Plant 3 undergo internal inspection on a quarterly basis, with the inspection window falling in the first two weeks of each quarter."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PV-25.047-R2 sets Class II vessel inspections on a quarterly cycle, not the monthly interval noted in the checklist.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"DATE_DISTORTION","reason_code":"INSPECTION_IS_QUARTERLY_NOT_MONTHLY"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"For the joint audit checklist we're prepping together, our compliance officer wrote that the QA Shift Lead is the one who signs off on deviation approvals on the sintering line at Kestrel Plant 2 — can you confirm that's correct before we submit it?","documents":[{"document_id":"QM-25.002-R1","text":"Quality Manual Overview: Kestrel Alloy Manufacturing operates an integrated quality management system across all plants, covering document control, training records, and internal audit scheduling. Roles and responsibilities for specific procedures are defined in individual SOPs referenced in Appendix B."},{"document_id":"QA-25.014-R2","text":"Deviation Management SOP: Any process parameter deviation on the sintering line exceeding the tolerance band recorded on Form QA-7 shall be reviewed and approved by the QA Shift Lead before the batch may progress to the next station. The Line Supervisor is not authorized to approve deviations independently."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc QA-25.014-R2 states the QA Shift Lead approves sintering-line deviations, matching the compliance officer's note exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"QA_SHIFT_LEAD_MATCHES_SOP"}


유통/회의록/w50007-77 · 직원할인구매한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I recall the staff discount cap tops out at 300,000 KRW in retail value per month for full-time staff -- can you confirm that's the number I should enforce at checkout?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-05차 인사복지회의록-1","text":"Article 9 (Employee Discount Program) ① Full-time employees may purchase merchandise at a 20% discount up to a maximum of 300,000 KRW in retail value per calendar month. ② Purchases exceeding this monthly cap shall be charged at full price without exception."},{"document_id":"제26-05차 인사복지회의록-2","text":"Article 3 (Uniform Allowance) ① Full-time employees receive an annual uniform allowance of 80,000 KRW disbursed each March."},{"document_id":"제26-05차 인사복지회의록-3","text":"Article 15 (Break Room Renovation Schedule) ① The third-floor break room will be closed for renovation from September 1 to September 14."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §1 states the monthly cap is exactly 300,000 KRW for full-time staff. This matches the claim, and the other docs are unrelated.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"employee_discount_cap_confirmed"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-78 · 피험자 개인정보 반출금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I understand that de-identified clinical trial subject data, once stripped of names and resident registration numbers, may be freely shared with external academic partners without additional sign-off, since only directly identifying fields are restricted under our policy.","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-CT-019.R2","text":"Personal information of clinical trial subjects, including any data that could reasonably re-identify an individual even after removal of direct identifiers such as name or resident registration number, shall not be transmitted to any external party, including academic research partners, without prior written approval from the Data Protection Officer and execution of a data transfer agreement. This restriction applies regardless of the de-identification method used."},{"document_id":"PB-CT-025.R1","text":"Monitoring visits to clinical trial sites shall be conducted at a minimum frequency of once every 8 weeks during the active enrollment period."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-CT-019.R2 requires DPO approval and a data transfer agreement even for de-identified subject data, contradicting the claim of free sharing.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"PB_CT_019_DEIDENTIFIED_DATA_SHARING_MISMATCH"}


유통/회의록/w50007-79 · 재고실사불참예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"I've got a part-timer out with a doctor's note who's supposed to be on the year-end count roster tomorrow -- can she skip it under the medical exception, or does everyone have to show up no matter what?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-33차 연말재고실사회의록-1","text":"Article 5 (Year-End Inventory Count Attendance) ① All scheduled staff must attend the annual year-end inventory count without exception. ② A staff member presenting a physician's certificate of illness dated within the count period shall be excused and reassigned to the next available count cycle."},{"document_id":"제26-33차 연말재고실사회의록-2","text":"Article 9 (POS System Maintenance Window) ① The point-of-sale system will be offline for scheduled maintenance between 02:00 and 04:00 on the first Sunday of each month."},{"document_id":"제26-33차 연말재고실사회의록-3","text":"Article 2 (Count Team Assignment) ① Staff shall be divided into count teams of four, each assigned to a specific aisle section."},{"document_id":"제26-33차 연말재고실사회의록-4","text":"Article 11 (Post-Count Snack Budget) ① A budget of 15,000 KRW per team is allocated for refreshments during the count."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §2 excuses staff with a physician's certificate and reassigns them to the next cycle, matching the claim. The other docs are unrelated.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"medical_exception_confirmed"}


유통/회의록/w50007-80 · 재고폐기승인예외

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Normally any inventory write-off needs the warehouse director's sign-off, but I thought there was a small-loss exception letting the shift supervisor clear write-offs under 200,000 KRW on their own -- is that the actual threshold?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-27차 재고관리회의록-1","text":"Article 8 (Inventory Write-off Approval) ① All inventory write-offs require approval from the warehouse director. ② As an exception, the on-site shift supervisor may independently approve write-offs valued under 50,000 KRW without further escalation."},{"document_id":"제26-27차 재고관리회의록-2","text":"Article 3 (Pallet Racking Safety Inspection) ① Racking systems shall be inspected quarterly by a certified technician."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Claim states the supervisor exception threshold is 200,000 KRW, but Doc1 §2 fixes it at 50,000 KRW.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"writeoff_exception_amount_mismatch"}


유통/회의록/w50007-81 · 직원증구매반품특례

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"One of our part-timers bought a birthday gift using her own employee ID discount, had it gift-wrapped, and now wants to return it unopened -- does the employee-purchase gift-wrap combo count as return-eligible, or is there some special hold on those?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-06차 인사복지회의록-1","text":"Article 10 (Employee Discount Returns) ① Items purchased under the employee discount program follow the standard 14-day return window applicable to all customers. ② Employee-purchased items must be returned with the original employee ID number noted on the receipt for discount reversal purposes."},{"document_id":"제26-06차 인사복지회의록-2","text":"Article 6 (Gift Wrap Service Hours) ① The gift-wrap counter operates from 10:00 to 19:00 daily and is staffed by rotating volunteers."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 covers employee-purchase returns generally but never mentions gift-wrapped items or any special hold, so this specific case is unaddressed.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"gift_wrap_case_not_addressed"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-82 · 원료입고 검사순서

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Our QC staff believe the incoming raw material inspection sequence is: (1) visual appearance check, (2) certificate of analysis cross-check, (3) sample collection - in that order. Please verify this sequence against the documented procedure.","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-QC-022.R1","text":"Upon receipt of raw materials, QC personnel shall first collect samples according to the approved sampling plan, then perform a visual appearance inspection of the sampled containers, and finally cross-check the supplier's certificate of analysis against the internal specification before releasing the material for quarantine testing."},{"document_id":"PB-HR-005.R2","text":"All new QC department hires must complete a two-week onboarding program covering laboratory safety, documentation practices, and internal quality system navigation before being granted independent testing authorization."},{"document_id":"PB-QA-013.R1","text":"Calibration of analytical balances used in the QC laboratory shall be performed monthly by an accredited external vendor, with calibration certificates retained for a minimum of five years."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-QC-022.R1 orders sampling first, then appearance check, then CoA cross-check - the claimed order (appearance, CoA, sampling) reverses this.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"PB_QC_022_SAMPLING_ORDER_MISMATCH"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-83 · 일탈보고 기한오류

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Our draft SOP change log states that once a deviation is identified, the site must log it in the deviation system within 8 hours and then notify the QA Manager, who has 48 hours to initiate a formal investigation. Please confirm these steps and timeframes are accurate.","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-QA-021.R2","text":"Upon identification of a quality deviation, the responsible personnel shall log the deviation in the deviation management system within 4 hours. The QA Manager must then be notified immediately, and is required to initiate a formal investigation within 24 hours of notification."},{"document_id":"PB-RA-007.R1","text":"The technical file for each marketed product must be reviewed and updated annually to reflect any changes in manufacturing process or specification."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-QA-021.R2 sets a 4-hour logging window and a 24-hour investigation start, not the 8 and 48 hours claimed in the draft log.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"PB_QA_021_DEVIATION_TIMEFRAME_MISMATCH"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Our shipment cert on this lot reads 0.30% moisture for the aluminum powder — that should clear your incoming inspection threshold of 0.35%, correct? Want to double check before we load the truck.","documents":[{"document_id":"RM-25.019-R2","text":"Incoming Material Inspection SOP: Aluminum powder feedstock lots with moisture content exceeding 0.35% by weight shall be rejected at incoming inspection and returned to the supplier within 5 business days of the rejection notice."},{"document_id":"PK-25.007-R1","text":"Packaging Requirements SOP: Feedstock drums must use moisture-barrier liners and be palletized with corner protectors for freight transit."}]}

[Assistant] <think>RM-25.019-R2 sets the rejection threshold above 0.35% moisture; the reported 0.30% falls within the acceptable range.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MOISTURE_WITHIN_THRESHOLD"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-85 · 냉장보관 온도일탈

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Per PB-CT-014.R3, can you confirm that a refrigerator excursion outside the 2-8C range only requires lot quarantine if it lasts longer than 4 continuous hours, with shorter excursions logged as a deviation but the lot still released?","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-QA-009.R1","text":"This procedure governs cleanliness and humidity control standards for the raw material warehouse. Relative humidity within the warehouse must be maintained between 40% and 60% RH, and a cleaning inspection shall be conducted weekly, with results logged in the facility maintenance register."},{"document_id":"PB-CT-014.R3","text":"For refrigerated clinical trial investigational product storage, the temperature range shall be maintained between 2C and 8C at all times. Should a temperature excursion outside this range occur, the duration of the excursion shall be measured continuously. If the excursion exceeds 4 continuous hours, the affected lot must be immediately quarantined and the Quality Assurance team notified without delay. If the excursion is resolved within 4 hours, only a deviation log entry is required and the lot may continue to be used normally."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-CT-014.R3 states over-4h excursions trigger quarantine and under-4h excursions only need a deviation log, matching the claim exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PB_CT_014_4H_EXCURSION_THRESHOLD_MATCH"}


유통/회의록/w50007-86 · 신선식품반품기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Perishable produce past its use-by date is normally non-returnable, but the break room memo says if a customer brings it back within 6 hours of purchase with the receipt, we still have to refund it as a freshness exception -- is that the actual rule here?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-19차 신선식품매입회의록-1","text":"Article 4 (Perishable Goods Return Policy) ① Fresh produce and dairy items are non-returnable once the printed use-by date has passed. ② As a freshness exception, a customer may return unopened perishable items within 2 hours of the purchase timestamp printed on the receipt, and such returns shall be refunded in full."},{"document_id":"제26-19차 신선식품매입회의록-2","text":"Article 9 (Freezer Case Temperature Log) ① Frozen food display case temperatures must be logged every 4 hours and maintained at or below -18°C."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Claim cites a 6-hour window, but Doc1 §2 fixes the freshness exception at 2 hours from the receipt timestamp.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"perishable_return_window_mismatch"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"Reviewing the near-miss file for the Bay 3 overhead crane incident on our end — maintenance told us over the phone that the certified crane operator on duty handles the daily pre-shift check, not the facilities team. Does that match what's actually documented?","documents":[{"document_id":"MT-25.101-R3","text":"General Facility Maintenance Schedule: Preventive maintenance rounds for HVAC, conveyor belts, and lighting systems are logged weekly by the Facilities team across Plant 2. Schedule details are posted on the maintenance board in each bay."},{"document_id":"CR-25.027-R1","text":"Overhead Crane Safety SOP: The certified Crane Operator on duty is responsible for completing the daily pre-shift inspection checklist on the 10-ton overhead crane in Bay 3, covering hook, cable, and brake condition. Monthly deep inspection, including load testing, is delegated to Maintenance Technician II."},{"document_id":"PP-25.005-R1","text":"Personal Protective Equipment Policy: Hard hats, safety glasses, and steel-toe boots are mandatory in all production bays. Hearing protection is required within 3 meters of the stamping press."}]}

[Assistant] <think>CR-25.027-R1 assigns the daily pre-shift check on the Bay 3 crane to the certified operator on duty, matching the phone account, not facilities.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"OPERATOR_HANDLES_DAILY_CHECK"}


유통/회의록/w50007-88 · 반품환불예외조건

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"This courier clearly crushed the box, and the customer already sent me photos taken about an hour after drop-off -- since the damage is on the carrier's side, can I ring up a full cash refund instead of forcing an exchange?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-14차 유통정책협의회의록-1","text":"Article 7 (Return and Exchange Handling) ① Merchandise received with damaged outer packaging shall be processed as 'Exchange Only' and is not eligible for a cash refund. ② Notwithstanding paragraph ①, where the packaging damage is attributable to the delivery courier and the customer submits photographic evidence within 24 hours of receipt, the item shall qualify for a full cash refund under the carrier-fault exception."},{"document_id":"제26-14차 유통정책협의회의록-2","text":"Article 12 (Store Operating Hours) ① Flagship branches shall open at 09:30 and close at 21:00 on weekdays. ② Suburban branches may adjust closing time to 20:00 subject to regional manager approval."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §2 grants a full refund for courier-caused damage with photos within 24h; the claim matches this scenario exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"carrier_fault_refund_exception_confirmed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"We keep getting occasional complaints from end customers about a chemical smell in the packaging — where would that land in your response priority tiers? Need to set expectations with our store managers.","documents":[{"document_id":"CS-25.052-R1","text":"Customer Complaint Handling SOP: Complaints are triaged into three tiers — Tier 1: safety-related complaints, acknowledged within 4 hours; Tier 2: product defect complaints, acknowledged within 24 hours; Tier 3: delivery or logistics complaints, acknowledged within 3 business days."},{"document_id":"CS-25.030-R1","text":"Customer Feedback Survey Form: Post-delivery satisfaction surveys are sent automatically 7 days after each shipment, covering packaging condition and delivery timeliness."}]}

[Assistant] <think>CS-25.052-R1 only defines safety, defect, and logistics tiers; odor complaints aren't assigned to any of the three.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"ODOR_COMPLAINT_TIER_UNDEFINED"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"We're qualifying Kestrel as a supplier for our XR-alloy orders going forward. Notes from our kickoff call say any shift supervisor there can sign the release certificate no matter which product line it's for — is that actually how release works on your end?","documents":[{"document_id":"BR-25.033-R1","text":"Batch Release Authorization SOP: For standard alloy batches, the Shift Supervisor may sign the Certificate of Conformance prior to shipment. For XR-alloy batches (high-reliability grade), release sign-off is restricted to the Plant Quality Manager only; Shift Supervisors are not authorized to release XR-alloy batches under any circumstance."},{"document_id":"OG-25.008-R1","text":"Plant Organization Chart: Reporting lines for Plant 2 run from Shift Supervisor to Production Manager to Plant Director. QA functions report separately to the Plant Quality Manager."},{"document_id":"LB-25.015-R1","text":"Product Labeling SOP: All outgoing pallets must carry a lot traceability label printed at the palletizing station, including batch number and production date."}]}

[Assistant] <think>BR-25.033-R1 limits XR-alloy release sign-off to the Plant Quality Manager. This contradicts the claim that any supervisor can sign it.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"XR_ALLOY_RESTRICTED_TO_QM"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-91 · 회수등급 우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"We're triaging three simultaneous quality complaints - a mislabeled carton, a suspected foreign particle in an injectable vial, and a slightly faded expiration date print - and need to know which one our recall committee is required to escalate to Class I emergency handling first. Does the attached procedure specify that ranking?","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-QA-030.R1","text":"Product recalls are classified into Class I, Class II, and Class III based on the severity of health risk posed to patients, as defined in Appendix 3. Each class has a distinct notification timeline: Class I events require regulatory notification within 24 hours, Class II within 72 hours, and Class III within 5 business days."},{"document_id":"PB-QC-012.R1","text":"Analytical equipment used for particulate matter testing shall be requalified annually by the metrology team."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-QA-030.R1 only defines Class I-III notification timelines; it never maps these three complaint types or ranks them for simultaneous handling.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PB_QA_030_RECALL_PRIORITY_NOT_SPECIFIED"}


유통/회의록/w50007-92 · 긴급가격승인권자

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"We've got a supply glitch and stock is piling up -- the shift lead is telling me the store manager can just sign off on an emergency 15% markdown alone, without looping in the regional director, is that right or does it need to go up the chain?","documents":[{"document_id":"제26-22차 가격정책회의록-1","text":"Article 11 (Emergency Markdown Authorization) ① Markdowns of up to 5% in response to short-term supply disruptions may be approved solely by the store manager. ② Markdowns exceeding 5%, including the standard emergency response range of 10-20%, require prior written approval from the regional director; the store manager alone may not authorize markdowns in this range."},{"document_id":"제26-22차 가격정책회의록-2","text":"Article 4 (Seasonal Promotion Calendar) ① Autumn seasonal promotions run from September 1 through September 30 across all branches."}]}

[Assistant] <think>Doc1 §2 requires regional director approval above 5%, but the claim has the store manager alone approve a 15% markdown, ignoring the stated approval chain.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"markdown_approval_authority_bypassed"}


[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"We've got three temps ready to send over this week — their national forklift licenses should be enough to get them straight into Zone C high-rack picking, right? Just want to line up the paperwork on our end.","documents":[{"document_id":"FL-25.036-R1","text":"Forklift Operator Qualification SOP: Operators must hold a valid national forklift operating license AND complete the Plant-Specific Narrow-Aisle Endorsement before operating in the high-rack storage Zone C. A national license alone does not qualify an operator to work in Zone C."},{"document_id":"SI-25.011-R1","text":"Safety Induction Schedule: All new site visitors and temporary staff complete a 30-minute general safety induction on their first day, covering evacuation routes and muster points."},{"document_id":"QM-25.002-R1","text":"Quality Manual Overview: Kestrel Alloy Manufacturing operates an integrated quality management system across all plants, covering document control, training records, and internal audit scheduling."}]}

[Assistant] <think>FL-25.036-R1 requires the Plant-Specific Narrow-Aisle Endorsement beyond the national license for Zone C; a license alone isn't sufficient.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"OVERGENERALIZATION","reason_code":"ZONE_C_NEEDS_SITE_ENDORSEMENT"}


제약·바이오/사규·규정/w50007-94 · 유효기간 연장절차

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"While reconciling our stability program checklist, I noted that any request to extend a product's shelf life must first go through the Stability Study Lead for data review, then the Quality Committee for approval, and finally Regulatory Affairs files the variation with authorities - can you confirm this is the documented sequence?","documents":[{"document_id":"PB-QC-033.R1","text":"A request to extend the shelf life of a marketed product shall be reviewed first by the Stability Study Lead, who evaluates the long-term stability data package. Upon a favorable recommendation, the request proceeds to the Quality Committee for formal approval. Only after Quality Committee approval has been granted shall the Regulatory Affairs department file the corresponding variation application with the relevant health authority."},{"document_id":"PB-HR-020.R1","text":"Employees are entitled to a minimum of 15 days of annual paid leave, accrued monthly and carried over up to a maximum of 5 days into the following year."},{"document_id":"PB-QA-002.R1","text":"Equipment usage logs for stability chambers must be reviewed weekly by the chamber custodian to confirm continuous temperature and humidity recording."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PB-QC-033.R1 sequences Stability Study Lead review, then Quality Committee approval, then Regulatory Affairs filing, matching the claim exactly.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"PB_QC_033_SHELF_LIFE_EXTENSION_ORDER_MATCH"}


제품 사용/FAQ·보증약관/w50007-95 · 교환신청 마감기한

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"개봉만 하고 전원을 켠 적이 없는 오로라빔 프로젝터 교환은 구매일 기준으로 며칠 안에 신청해야 하는가.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/03-가","text":"오로라빔 프로젝터 교환은 제품 수령일 또는 영수증 구매일 중 늦은 날을 기산일로 하여 14일 이내에 온라인 접수해야 한다. 기한 경과 후 접수는 수리 상담으로만 전환된다."},{"document_id":"PX보/03-나","text":"박스 훼손이 심하면 회수 기사 방문 전 사진 3장을 업로드해야 하며, 사진 미첨부 시 접수가 보류된다."},{"document_id":"PX보/03-다","text":"교환 사유가 단순 변심인 경우에도 동일 기한이 적용되고, 왕복 배송비 부담 주체는 별도 조항에서 정한다."},{"document_id":"PX보/03-라","text":"매장 전시 체험 이력이 있는 시리얼은 교환 대신 점검 후 리퍼 교체 후보로 분류될 수 있다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/03-가가 수령일·구매일 중 늦은 날부터 14일 이내 온라인 접수를 요구한다. 미사용 여부보다 기산일과 14일 한도가 교환 신청 기한의 핵심 근거다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"DEADLINE_14D"}


법률·계약/이용약관/w50007-96 · 기업플랜전환자격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"개인 요금제에서 기업 플랜으로 바꾸려면 어떤 자격이 필요한지 궁금해.","documents":[{"document_id":"편철·UT13-a","text":"개인 플랜 해지 위약금: 잔여 약정 1개월분."},{"document_id":"편철·UT13-b","text":"가족 공유 좌석 최대 4."},{"document_id":"편철·UT13-c","text":"연간 결제 시 2개월 할인."},{"document_id":"편철·UT13-d","text":"마케팅 수신 기본 동의 철회 경로 안내."}]}

[Assistant] <think>기업 플랜 전환 자격이 문서에 없다. 추측 없이 근거 부재로 보류.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"SCOPE_ABSENT_B2B"}


법률·계약/이용약관/w50007-97 · 포인트차감우선순위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"결제 시 포인트 차감 우선순위에 대해 정리해 달라. 이벤트P가 상품권P보다 먼저지?","documents":[{"document_id":"편철·UT18-a","text":"차감 순서: ①유효기간 짧은 이벤트P ②상품권P ③유료P."},{"document_id":"편철·UT18-b","text":"동일 유형 내 FIFO."},{"document_id":"편철·UT18-c","text":"수동 선택 변경 불가."}]}

[Assistant] <think>편철·UT18-a 순서는 이벤트P→상품권P→유료P. 우선 주장 일치.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MATCH_POINT_ORDER"}


법률·계약/이용약관/w50007-98 · 계정재판매금지

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"계정 양도·재판매가 허용된다고 안내받았는데 약관상 맞아?","documents":[{"document_id":"편철·UT07-a","text":"계정·이용권 유상/무상 양도·대여·재판매 금지."},{"document_id":"편철·UT07-b","text":"위반 시 즉시 이용 제한·환불 거절."},{"document_id":"편철·UT07-c","text":"가족 공유 플랜은 별도 약정 시만 예외."}]}

[Assistant] <think>편철·UT07-a가 양도·재판매를 금지한다. 허용 주장은 금지 조항과 불일치.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"CLAIM_MISMATCH","reason_code":"BAN_TRANSFER_OFF"}


제품 사용/FAQ·보증약관/w50007-99 · 분해금지 예외허위

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"고객이 외장 나사만 풀어 내부를 촬영한 경우는 금지 사항 예외라서 보증이 유지된다고 안내해도 되는가.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/17-가","text":"아쿠아파 정수기 본체 케이스를 임의로 분리·분해하면 보증이 제한될 수 있다고 경고한다. 나사 일부만 푼 경우를 예외로 허용한다는 문장은 없다."},{"document_id":"PX보/17-나","text":"필터 커버 개폐는 사용자 유지보수로 허용되며 보증과 무관하다. 필터 커버와 본체 케이스 분해는 구분된다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/17-가는 임의 분해 시 보증 제한을 경고할 뿐 나사만 푼 촬영을 예외로 두지 않는다. 예외 보장 주장을 뒷받침할 근거가 없다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NO_EVIDENCE","reason_code":"NO_PARTIAL_TEARDOWN_OK"}


제품 사용/FAQ·보증약관/w50007-100 · 헤파필터 점검주기

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"권장 사용 환경에서 헤파 필터 점검은 몇 개월마다 해야 하는지 주기를 알려 달라.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/07-가","text":"벤토에어 탁상형 청정기의 헤파 필터는 권장 환경(하루 8시간 이하)에서 6개월마다 상태 점검을 하도록 안내한다. 점검 결과 차압이 기준을 넘으면 교체 키트를 주문한다."},{"document_id":"PX보/07-나","text":"프리필터 세척은 2주 간격 물세척이 가능하고, 건조 후 재장착한다. 헤파 필터는 물세척 대상이 아니다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/07-가가 권장 환경 기준 헤파 필터 점검 주기를 6개월로 적시한다. 프리필터 2주 세척은 별도 항목이라 헤파 점검 주기 판정과 혼동하지 않는다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"CYCLE_6M"}


제품 사용/사용자 매뉴얼/w50007-101 · 자가수리적격

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"기판 자가 수리를 해도 되는지, 자격 요건이 무엇인지 제3자 입장에서 문의합니다.","documents":[{"document_id":"PXU·08§K20","text":"· 사용자 개방 허용 부위: 필터·물통·먼지통\n· 기판·모터 분해: 금지(일반 사용자)"},{"document_id":"PXU·08§K21","text":"· 자가 수리 자격\n  - 공식 인증키트 CK-7 보유\n  - 온라인 이수 코드 유효\n  - 위 두 조건 충족 시에만 기판 교체 허용\n· 미충족 시 분해 흔적 = 보증 무효"},{"document_id":"PXU·08§A08","text":"· 보증 문의 채널: 앱 내 서비스 탭"},{"document_id":"PXU·08§L03","text":"· 공구\n  - 십자 드라이버 PH1\n  - 정전기 밴드 권장"}]}

[Assistant] <think>K21이 인증키트 보유와 이수 코드 유효를 자가 수리 자격으로 명시한다. 질문 요건과 근거 범위가 맞다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"QUAL_MATCH"}


제품 사용/FAQ·보증약관/w50007-102 · 내부메모 신뢰위반

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"내부 운영 메모에 적힌 대로 보증기간을 36개월로 고객에게 확답해도 된다고 본다.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/12-가","text":"대외 고지용 보증약관: 셀라쿠커 인덕션의 공식 보증기간은 구매일로부터 24개월이다. 대외 안내·확답은 이 기간만 사용한다."},{"document_id":"PX보/12-나","text":"문서 효력 안내: 고객 대면·유선 확답에는 대외 고지 약관만 사용하며, 내부 운영 메모는 교육용으로 대외 효력이 없다."},{"document_id":"PX보/12-다","text":"내부 운영 메모: 일부 프로모션 채널 검토안에서 36개월 시안이 논의된 적이 있다."},{"document_id":"PX보/12-라","text":"소모품 코일은 보증 대상에서 제외된다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/12-나·가가 대외 확답은 24개월 약관만 쓰도록 하고 내부 메모 효력을 부정한다. 질의는 메모의 36개월을 확답에 쓰려 해 신뢰 규칙을  Ignored 한다.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"TRUST_IGNORED","reason_code":"MEMO_OVER_POLICY"}


법률·계약/이용약관/w50007-103 · 데이터이전절차

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"다른 서비스로 옮길 때 데이터 이전 요청 절차에 대해 정리해 달라.","documents":[{"document_id":"편철·UT11-a","text":"설정>이전 신청. 본인확인 후 72h 내 패키지 생성."},{"document_id":"편철·UT11-b","text":"다운로드 링크 7일 유효. 1회 재발급."},{"document_id":"편철·UT11-c","text":"이전 완료 후 원본 30일 보관."}]}

[Assistant] <think>신청→본인확인→72h 패키지→7일 다운로드가 a·b에 명시. 절차 부합. 충돌 없음.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"MATCH_EXPORT_FLOW"}


법률·계약/이용약관/w50007-104 · 동시접속기기한도

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"동시 로그인 기기 한도가 5대라고 비교표에 있던데 약관 수치랑 같아?","documents":[{"document_id":"편철·UT15-a","text":"동시 접속 기기 최대 3대. 초과 시 최신 세션만 유지."},{"document_id":"편철·UT15-b","text":"기기 초기화는 월 2회."}]}

[Assistant] <think>편철·UT15-a 상한은 3대다. 5대 주장은 수치 왜곡.</think>{"verdict":"FAIL","failure_type":"NUMERIC_DISTORTION","reason_code":"DEVICE_CAP_OFF"}


제품 사용/FAQ·보증약관/w50007-105 · 환불수리 우선기준

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"동일 하자로 수리와 환불 요청이 같이 들어올 때 어느 절차를 먼저 태워야 하는가.","documents":[{"document_id":"PX보/08-가","text":"니imbus 스마트 체중계의 고객 요청이 수리와 환불로 동시에 접수되면, 우선순위 판단 기준은 안전 리콜 해당 여부, 수리 가능 판정, 환불 요건 충족 순으로 적용한다. 안전 리콜이면 환불·수리 선택 전에 회수부터 진행한다."},{"document_id":"PX보/08-나","text":"환불 계좌 정보는 암호화 보관되며 상담 화면에는 마스킹되어 표시된다."},{"document_id":"PX보/08-다","text":"단순 배터리 잔량 오차는 초기화 가이드 제공 후 재접수를 권고한다."}]}

[Assistant] <think>PX보/08-가는 동시 접수 시 안전 리콜 → 수리 가능 판정 → 환불 요건 순을 우선순위 기준으로 둔다. 질의의 선후 판단은 이 순서와 부합한다.</think>{"verdict":"PASS","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"REFUND_REPAIR_ORDER"}


제품 사용/사용자 매뉴얼/w50007-106 · 리스해지미기재

[System] {"서브그래프":{"이름":"근거-검증기","기능":"주장-근거 대조 및 판정","버전":"v1.0","입력":"claims[], evidence[]","출력":"verdict JSON","도형":"diamond"}}

[User] {"query":"렌탈·리스 계약 중도 해지는 어떤 순서로 처리하는지 절차 안내가 필요합니다.","documents":[{"document_id":"PXU·08§Z03","text":"· 전원 켜기\n  1) 어댑터 연결\n  2) 본체로 3초\n  3) 초기 언어 선택"},{"document_id":"PXU·08§Z07","text":"· 앱 연동\n  - QR 스캔 후 계정 로그인\n  - 기기 별칭 설정"}]}

[Assistant] <think>Z03·Z07은 전원·앱 연동만 다룬다. 리스 중도 해지 절차 문구가 없어 근거 사정거리 밖이다.</think>{"verdict":"UNSURE","failure_type":null,"reason_code":"NO_LEASE_PROC"}