| 1 | | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
| 2 | net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders | $ -14108 ( 14108 ) | $ -333601 ( 333601 ) | $ 50408 |
| 3 | less : dividends on share-based awards expected to vest | -2513 ( 2513 ) | -1759 ( 1759 ) | -1631 ( 1631 ) |
| 4 | basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders | -16621 ( 16621 ) | -335360 ( 335360 ) | 48777 |
| 5 | noncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders | - | - | 2640 |
| 6 | diluted net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders | $ -16621 ( 16621 ) | $ -335360 ( 335360 ) | $ 51417 |
| 7 | weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 238920 | 201206 | 146915 |
| 8 | weighted average partnership units outstanding | - | - | 7619 |
| 9 | other potential dilutive shares | - | - | 19 |
| 10 | weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities | 238920 | 201206 | 154553 |
weighted average number of common shares and potential diluted securities 238920 201206 154553 criteria in fasb asc 360-20 related to the terms of the transactions and any continuing involvement in the form of management or financial assistance from the seller associated with the properties . we make judgments based on the specific terms of each transaction as to the amount of the total profit from the transaction that we recognize considering factors such as continuing ownership interest we may have with the buyer ( 201cpartial sales 201d ) and our level of future involvement with the property or the buyer that acquires the assets . if the full accrual sales criteria are not met , we defer gain recognition and account for the continued operations of the property by applying the finance , installment or cost recovery methods , as appropriate , until the full accrual sales criteria are met . estimated future costs to be incurred after completion of each sale are included in the determination of the gain on sales . to the extent that a property has had operations prior to sale , and that we do not have continuing involvement with the property , gains from sales of depreciated property are included in discontinued operations and the proceeds from the sale of these held-for-rental properties are classified in the investing activities section of the consolidated statements of cash flows . gains or losses from our sale of properties that were developed or repositioned with the intent to sell and not for long-term rental ( 201cbuild-for-sale 201d properties ) are classified as gain on sale of properties in the consolidated statements of operations . other rental properties that do not meet the criteria for presentation as discontinued operations are also classified as gain on sale of properties in the consolidated statements of operations . net income ( loss ) per common share basic net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders , less dividends on share- based awards expected to vest , by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period . diluted net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing the sum of basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders and the noncontrolling interest in earnings allocable to units not owned by us ( to the extent the units are dilutive ) , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and , to the extent they are dilutive , partnership units outstanding , as well as any potential dilutive securities for the period . during the first quarter of 2009 , we adopted a new accounting standard ( fasb asc 260-10 ) on participating securities , which we have applied retrospectively to prior period calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share . pursuant to this new standard , certain of our share-based awards are considered participating securities because they earn dividend equivalents that are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest . the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income ( loss ) per common share ( in thousands ) : .\nConversations: \nQuestion: what was the proportion of basic net income attributable to common shareholders to the diluted net income attributable to common shareholders?\nAnswer:",
"output": "0.94866"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: hr solutions . | 1 | ( dollars in millions ) | payments due by period total | payments due by period less than 1 year | payments due by period 1-3 years | payments due by period 3-5 years | payments due by period more than 5 years |
| 2 | 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) senior notes | $ 200.0 | $ - | $ 200.0 | $ - | $ - |
| 3 | 5.40% ( 5.40 % ) senior notes | 250.0 | - | - | - | 250.0 |
| 4 | junior subordinated debt | 329.9 | - | - | - | 329.9 |
| 5 | 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) long term notes | 400.0 | - | - | - | 400.0 |
| 6 | interest expense ( 1 ) | 2243.0 | 77.2 | 145.7 | 119.5 | 1900.6 |
| 7 | employee benefit plans | 2.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - |
| 8 | operating lease agreements | 32.0 | 8.5 | 16.3 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| 9 | gross reserve for losses and lae ( 2 ) | 9040.6 | 2053.2 | 3232.3 | 1077.1 | 2678.1 |
| 10 | total | $ 12497.9 | $ 2141.3 | $ 3594.3 | $ 1200.3 | $ 5562.0 |
( 1 ) interest expense on 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) long term notes is assumed to be fixed through contractual term . ( 2 ) loss and lae reserves represent our best estimate of losses from claim and related settlement costs . both the amounts and timing of such payments are estimates , and the inherent variability of resolving claims as well as changes in market conditions make the timing of cash flows uncertain . therefore , the ultimate amount and timing of loss and lae payments could differ from our estimates . the contractual obligations for senior notes , long term notes and junior subordinated debt are the responsibility of holdings . we have sufficient cash flow , liquidity , investments and access to capital markets to satisfy these obligations . holdings gen- erally depends upon dividends from everest re , its operating insurance subsidiary for its funding , capital contributions from group or access to the capital markets . our various operating insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have sufficient cash flow , liquidity and investments to settle outstanding reserves for losses and lae . management believes that we , and each of our entities , have sufficient financial resources or ready access thereto , to meet all obligations . dividends . during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we declared and paid shareholder dividends of $ 121.4 million , $ 39.0 million and $ 25.4 million , respectively . as an insurance holding company , we are partially dependent on dividends and other permitted pay- ments from our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to our shareholders . the payment of dividends to group by holdings and to holdings by everest re is subject to delaware regulatory restrictions and the payment of dividends to group by bermuda re is subject to bermuda insurance regulatory restrictions . management expects that , absent extraordinary catastrophe losses , such restrictions should not affect everest re 2019s ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support holdings 2019 general corporate needs and that holdings and bermuda re will have the ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support group 2019s general corporate needs . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , everest re paid divi- dends to holdings of $ 245.0 million , $ 100.0 million and $ 75.0 million , respectively . for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , bermuda re paid dividends to group of $ 0.0 million , $ 60.0 million and $ 45.0 million , respectively . see item 1 , 201cbusiness 2013 regulatory matters 2013 dividends 201d and note 16 of notes to consolidated financial statements . application of new accounting standards . in november 2005 , the fasb issued fasb staff position ( 201cfsp 201d ) fas 115-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain investments 201d ( 201cfas 115-1 201d ) , which is effective for reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2005 . fas 115-1 addresses the determination as to when an investment is considered impaired , whether the impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss . fas 115-1 also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain dis- closures about unrealized losses not recognized as other-than-temporary impairments . the company adopted fas 115-1 prospectively effective january 1 , 2006 . the company believes that all unrealized losses in its investment portfolio are temporary in nature. .\nConversations: \nQuestion: what was the difference in paid shareholder dividends between 2006 and 2007?\nAnswer:",
"output": "82.4"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . | 1 | contractual obligations | payments due by period ( in thousands ) total | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter |
| 2 | long-term debt ( 1 ) | $ 3508789 | $ 203244 | $ 409257 | $ 366456 | $ 461309 | $ 329339 | $ 1739184 |
| 3 | line of credit ( 2 ) | 56127 | 2650 | 2650 | 2650 | 48177 | 2014 | 2014 |
| 4 | share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 ) | 91235 | 2444 | 28466 | 5737 | 11598 | 1236 | 41754 |
| 5 | ground leases | 311120 | 10745 | 5721 | 5758 | 5793 | 5822 | 277281 |
| 6 | development and construction backlog costs ( 4 ) | 344700 | 331553 | 13147 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 |
| 7 | other | 43357 | 7502 | 7342 | 5801 | 4326 | 3906 | 14480 |
| 8 | total contractual obligations | $ 4355328 | $ 558138 | $ 466583 | $ 386402 | $ 531203 | $ 340303 | $ 2072699 |
( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .\nConversations: \nq0: what was the management fee earned for the year ended 12/31/16? 4.5\nq1: and the leasing fee for the same period? 2.4\nq2: how much combined was earned from these two fees? 6.9\nQuestion: and the development fee for that same period?\nAnswer:",
"output": "8.0"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . | 1 | year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010 | fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998 | year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009 | fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014 |
| 2 | total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized ) | | total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized ) | |
| 3 | included in other income ( expense ) | -2824 ( 2824 ) | included in other income ( expense ) | -2538 ( 2538 ) |
| 4 | purchases issuances and settlements | 24539 | purchases issuances and settlements | 12536 |
| 5 | transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3 | -31713 ( 31713 ) | transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3 | 2014 |
| 6 | balance at december 31 2010 | $ 2014 | balance at december 31 2009 | $ 9998 |
| 7 | the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date | $ -2824 ( 2824 ) | the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date | $ -2538 ( 2538 ) |
the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .\nConversations: \nQuestion: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?\nAnswer:",
"output": "24539.0"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares . the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group . historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation . historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns . stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 . ( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . | 1 | ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) | gross losses | reinsurance recoverable | net losses |
| 2 | balance at december 31 2006 | $ 35517 | $ 13509 | $ 22008 |
| 3 | losses and loss expenses incurred | 10831 | 3480 | 7351 |
| 4 | losses and loss expenses paid | -9516 ( 9516 ) | -3582 ( 3582 ) | -5934 ( 5934 ) |
| 5 | other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) | 280 | 113 | 167 |
| 6 | balance at december 31 2007 | 37112 | 13520 | 23592 |
| 7 | losses and loss expenses incurred | 10944 | 3341 | 7603 |
| 8 | losses and loss expenses paid | -9899 ( 9899 ) | -3572 ( 3572 ) | -6327 ( 6327 ) |
| 9 | other ( including foreign exchange revaluation ) | -1367 ( 1367 ) | -387 ( 387 ) | -980 ( 980 ) |
| 10 | losses and loss expenses acquired | 386 | 33 | 353 |
| 11 | balance at december 31 2008 | $ 37176 | $ 12935 | $ 24241 |
.\nConversations: \nq0: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008? 7603.0\nq1: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid? -6327.0\nq2: what then became that balance after these losses and loss expenses paid? 1276.0\nQuestion: and what was the total in other losses ( including foreign exchange revaluation )?\nAnswer:",
"output": "-980.0"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . | 1 | ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) | year ended december 31 2012 | year ended december 31 2011 | year ended december 31 2010 | year ended december 31 2009 | year ended december 31 2008 |
| 2 | sales and service revenues | $ 6708 | $ 6575 | $ 6723 | $ 6292 | $ 6189 |
| 3 | goodwill impairment | 2014 | 290 | 2014 | 2014 | 2465 |
| 4 | operating income ( loss ) | 358 | 100 | 241 | 203 | -2332 ( 2332 ) |
| 5 | net earnings ( loss ) | 146 | -100 ( 100 ) | 131 | 119 | -2397 ( 2397 ) |
| 6 | total assets | 6392 | 6069 | 5270 | 5097 | 4821 |
| 7 | long-term debt ( 1 ) | 1779 | 1830 | 105 | 283 | 283 |
| 8 | total long-term obligations | 4341 | 3838 | 1637 | 1708 | 1823 |
| 9 | free cash flow ( 2 ) | 170 | 331 | 168 | -269 ( 269 ) | 121 |
| 10 | dividends declared per share | $ 0.10 | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 2014 |
| 11 | basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) | $ 2.96 | $ -2.05 ( 2.05 ) | $ 2.68 | $ 2.44 | $ -49.14 ( 49.14 ) |
| 12 | diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) | $ 2.91 | $ -2.05 ( 2.05 ) | $ 2.68 | $ 2.44 | $ -49.14 ( 49.14 ) |
basic earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.96 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) diluted earnings ( loss ) per share ( 3 ) $ 2.91 $ ( 2.05 ) $ 2.68 $ 2.44 $ ( 49.14 ) ( 1 ) long-term debt does not include amounts payable to our former parent as of and before december 31 , 2010 , as these amounts were due upon demand and included in current liabilities . ( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures . see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure . ( 3 ) on march 30 , 2011 , the record date of the stock distribution associated with the spin-off from northrop grumman , approximately 48.8 million shares of $ 0.01 par value hii common stock were distributed to northrop grumman stockholders . this share amount was utilized for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings ( loss ) per share for the three months ended march 31 , 2011 , and all prior periods , as no common stock of the company existed prior to march 30 , 2011 , and the impact of dilutive securities in the three month period ended march 31 , 2011 , was not meaningful. .\nConversations: \nQuestion: what is the net change in value of total assets from 2008 to 2012?\nAnswer:",
"output": "1571.0"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( \"s&p 500 retail index\" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( \"s&p 500\" ) . . | 1 | ( in millions ) | operating income reconciliation |
| 2 | $ 10646 | 2016 ccg operating income |
| 3 | 1250 | lower ccg platform unit cost |
| 4 | 905 | lower ccg operating expense |
| 5 | 625 | higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1 |
| 6 | -645 ( 645 ) | higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology |
| 7 | 345 | other |
| 8 | $ 8166 | 2015 ccg operating income |
| 9 | -2060 ( 2060 ) | higher ccg platform unit costs |
| 10 | -1565 ( 1565 ) | lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2 |
| 11 | 435 | lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology |
| 12 | 430 | lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014 |
| 13 | 375 | lower operating expense |
| 14 | 224 | other |
| 15 | $ 10327 | 2014 ccg operating income |
1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .\nConversations: \nq0: what was the ccg operating income in 2016? 10646.0\nq1: and what was it in 2015? 8166.0\nq2: what was, then, the change over the year? 2480.0\nQuestion: what was the ccg operating income in 2015?\nAnswer:",
"output": "8166.0"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of a liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and political and economic conditions in certain countries . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company- specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons ( overnight , one week , two weeks , one month , three months , one year ) and over a variety of stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains a series of contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal measures that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . in december 2016 , the federal reserve board adopted final rules which require additional disclosures relating to the lcr of large financial institutions , including citi . among other things , the final rules require citi to disclose components of its average hqla , lcr and inflows and outflows each quarter . in addition , the final rules require disclosure of citi 2019s calculation of the maturity mismatch add-on as well as other qualitative disclosures . the effective date for these disclosures is april 1 , 2017 . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . | 1 | contractual obligations | payments due by period ( in thousands ) total | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021 | payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter |
| 2 | long-term debt ( 1 ) | $ 3508789 | $ 203244 | $ 409257 | $ 366456 | $ 461309 | $ 329339 | $ 1739184 |
| 3 | line of credit ( 2 ) | 56127 | 2650 | 2650 | 2650 | 48177 | 2014 | 2014 |
| 4 | share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 ) | 91235 | 2444 | 28466 | 5737 | 11598 | 1236 | 41754 |
| 5 | ground leases | 311120 | 10745 | 5721 | 5758 | 5793 | 5822 | 277281 |
| 6 | development and construction backlog costs ( 4 ) | 344700 | 331553 | 13147 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 | 2014 |
| 7 | other | 43357 | 7502 | 7342 | 5801 | 4326 | 3906 | 14480 |
| 8 | total contractual obligations | $ 4355328 | $ 558138 | $ 466583 | $ 386402 | $ 531203 | $ 340303 | $ 2072699 |
( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .\nConversations: \nQuestion: what was the change in value of management fees earned from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer:",
"output": "2.3"
},
{
"instruction": "",
"input": "In the context of this series of interconnected finance-related queries and the additional information provided by the pretext, table data, and posttext from a company's financial filings, please provide a response to the final question. This may require extracting information from the context and performing mathematical calculations. Please take into account the information provided in the preceding questions and their answers when formulating your response:\nContext: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .