Anonymousblind commited on
Commit
9ac7f2f
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 17373f3

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +101 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - visual-question-answering
5
+ - image-to-text
6
+ tags:
7
+ - hallucination
8
+ - vlm
9
+ - evaluation
10
+ - diagnostic
11
+ - representation-analysis
12
+ - subspace
13
+ pretty_name: "Subspace Validity Suite (SVS)"
14
+ configs:
15
+ - config_name: default
16
+ data_files: []
17
+ viewer: false
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Subspace Validity Suite (SVS) — Code & Checkpoints
21
+
22
+ **Diagnostic toolkit and experimental checkpoints for validating claimed "visual directions" in Vision-Language Models.**
23
+
24
+ > Associated paper: "The Subspace Validity Suite: Do Visual Directions in Vision-Language Models Survive Basic Sanity Checks?" (WACV 2027, Evaluations and Datasets Track)
25
+
26
+ ## Key Finding
27
+
28
+ We tested 11 methods for extracting "visual directions" from VLM hidden states across 3 architectures (LLaVA-1.5, LLaVA-Next, BLIP-2), 2 text-only backbones (Vicuna, Mistral), and 2 non-VLM transformer families (BLOOM, deepseek-coder). **Every method fails the gibberish specificity test**: random character sequences activate the claimed visual directions as strongly as visual descriptions (Gib/Vis ≈ 1.00, TOST equivalence p < 0.0001, N = 4,000).
29
+
30
+ ## Repository Structure
31
+
32
+ ### `svs/` — Toolkit Code
33
+ - `svs_toolkit.py` — Complete SVS implementation (6 diagnostic tests)
34
+ - `__init__.py` — Package init
35
+
36
+ ### `experiments/` — Experiment Scripts
37
+ All scripts are self-contained and run on Google Colab with an L4 GPU.
38
+
39
+ | Script | Experiment |
40
+ |--------|-----------|
41
+ | `scaled_gibberish_cpu.py` | Generate 1000 prompts per type |
42
+ | `scaled_gibberish_gpu.py` | N=4000 gibberish test on Vicuna |
43
+ | `scaled_gibberish_stats.py` | TOST equivalence + Cohen's d |
44
+ | `scaled_makebreak.py` | N=500 makebreak with McNemar's test |
45
+ | `pope_evaluation.py` | POPE evaluation (GRH validation) |
46
+ | `vista_actual.py` | VISTA actual codebase test |
47
+ | `pairwise_discrimination.py` | SVS Test 6: pairwise content classification |
48
+ | `impossible_classification.py` | 36-feature classifier test |
49
+ | `theorem_verification_v2.py` | Eigenvalue dominance verification |
50
+ | `blip2_gibberish.py` | BLIP-2 architecture test |
51
+ | `mistral_gibberish.py` | Mistral backbone test |
52
+ | `generalize_test.py` | Cross-domain (BLOOM + deepseek) |
53
+
54
+ ### `checkpoints/` — Experimental Results
55
+ Raw results for reviewer verification. Load with `json.load()` or `np.load()`.
56
+
57
+ | Checkpoint | Key Result |
58
+ |-----------|-----------|
59
+ | `gibberish_test/gpu_checkpoint.json` | N=4000 raw alpha values (9 methods × 4 layers × 4 types) |
60
+ | `gibberish_test/statistical_summary.json` | TOST p-values, Cohen's d, bootstrap CIs |
61
+ | `makebreak/checkpoint.json` | N=500 per-image CHAIR results |
62
+ | `pope/pope_checkpoint.json` | POPE accuracy (baseline vs VGCD: +0.000 difference) |
63
+ | `vista_actual/vista_actual_checkpoint.json` | 24-config VISTA gibberish test |
64
+ | `vista_actual/vista_actual_vectors.npz` | Extracted VISTA steering vectors |
65
+ | `classification/pairwise_discrimination.json` | 6-pair accuracy matrix (all >95%) |
66
+ | `theorem/theorem_results.json` | Weight matrix singular value analysis |
67
+
68
+ ### `directions/` — Extracted Subspaces
69
+ Pre-computed PCA/SVD/contrastive directions at layers [8, 16, 24, 32].
70
+
71
+ | File | Contents |
72
+ |------|----------|
73
+ | `subspaces_9methods.npz` | 9 methods × 4 layers (PCA, image, text, contrastive, etc.) |
74
+ | `directions_vista_nullu.npz` | VISTA + Nullu approximation directions |
75
+ | `subspaces_contrastive.npz` | Contrastive variant directions |
76
+
77
+ ## Quick Verification
78
+
79
+ ```python
80
+ import json, numpy as np
81
+
82
+ # Verify gibberish test: Gib/Vis ≈ 1.00 for all methods
83
+ with open("checkpoints/gibberish_test/statistical_summary.json") as f:
84
+ stats = json.load(f)
85
+ for method, result in stats.items():
86
+ print(f"{method}: Gib/Vis={result['gv_ratio']:.2f}, "
87
+ f"TOST p={result['tost_p']:.4f}, d={result['cohens_d']:.3f}")
88
+
89
+ # Verify POPE: VGCD has zero effect
90
+ with open("checkpoints/pope/pope_checkpoint.json") as f:
91
+ pope = json.load(f)
92
+ bl = pope.get("summary", {}).get("baseline_random", {})
93
+ vg = pope.get("summary", {}).get("vgcd_a1.5_random", {})
94
+ print(f"Baseline POPE: {bl.get('acc', 'N/A')}")
95
+ print(f"VGCD POPE: {vg.get('acc', 'N/A')}")
96
+ print(f"Difference: {vg.get('acc', 0) - bl.get('acc', 0):.3f}")
97
+ ```
98
+
99
+ ## License
100
+
101
+ MIT