Upload sft_v1/teach/gq_g4_1791535061_00020.jsonl with huggingface_hub
Browse files
sft_v1/teach/gq_g4_1791535061_00020.jsonl
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{"prompt": "Question: Three philosophers—Aristotle, Socrates, and Confucius—are each writing a short treatise titled “Falsafatuna”. Each treatise is either on Ethics, Metaphysics, or Logic, and each is written in a different language: Greek, Arabic, or Chinese. No philosopher writes on the subject that matches his own famous field, and no treatise is written in the language of its subject’s origin (Ethics → Greek, Metaphysics → Arabic, Logic → Chinese). Aristotle’s treatise is not in Greek. Which philosopher wrote the Logic treatise?\nAnswer:", "response": " Ethics originates Greek, Metaphysics Arabic, Logic Chinese.\nThus Logic cannot be in Chinese; it must be in Greek or Arabic.\nAristotle not Greek → his language is Arabic or Chinese.\nIf Aristotle wrote Logic, language would be Greek or Arabic (not Chinese). Possible.\nSocrates cannot write Ethics (his field), so Socrates writes either Metaphysics or Logic.\nConfucius cannot write Logic (his field), so Confucius writes Ethics or Metaphysics.\nTest assignments: try Aristotle = Ethics (forbidden – his field). So Aristotle ≠ Ethics.\nTry Aristotle = Metaphysics → language not Arabic (origin), so language Greek or Chinese; but Aristotle not Greek, so Chinese. OK.\nThen remaining subjects: Ethics, Logic for Socrates, Confucius.\nConfucius cannot Logic, so Confucius = Ethics (language not Greek → Arabic or Chinese; Greek banned). Greek not allowed, so Arabic. Socrates = Logic, language not Chinese → Greek or Arabic; Greek free. Works.\nThus Logic treatise is by Socrates.\n#### Socrates", "source": "gq_deduction", "level": "general"}
|
| 2 |
+
{"prompt": "Question: In a debate club, three members—Lina, Omar, and Priya—each argue for a different branch of philosophy: Epistemology, Aesthetics, or Ontology. Each uses a distinct prop: a book, a glass, or a sculpture. Omar does not use the book. The Aesthetics arguer uses the sculpture. Lina’s prop is not the glass. Who uses the glass?\nAnswer:", "response": " Props: book, glass, sculpture.\nAesthetics ⇒ sculpture.\nLina ≠ glass.\nOmar ≠ book.\nIf Lina used sculpture ⇒ Lina is Aesthetics.\nThen sculpture assigned to Lina, leaving book and glass for Omar and Priya.\nOmar cannot have book ⇒ Omar gets glass, Priya gets book.\nAll conditions satisfied.\n#### Omar", "source": "gq_deduction", "level": "general"}
|