Scenario_ID stringlengths 10 10 | Contract_Type stringclasses 6
values | Contract_Clause stringclasses 90
values | Stakeholder_Type stringclasses 9
values | Trigger_Event stringclasses 18
values | Decision_Context stringlengths 95 173 | Expected_Action stringclasses 76
values | Relevant_Contract_Reference stringclasses 15
values | Outcome_Optimization_Result stringclasses 6
values | Explanation stringclasses 270
values | ACQ_MMBtu int64 501k 10M | DCQ_MMBtu_per_day float64 1.37k 27.4k | MDCQ_MMBtu_per_day float64 1.52k 35.5k | Contract_Start_Date stringdate 2020-01-01 00:00:00 2024-12-30 00:00:00 | Contract_End_Date stringdate 2022-02-04 00:00:00 2039-11-13 00:00:00 | Jurisdiction stringclasses 7
values | Governing_Law stringclasses 7
values | Price_Basis stringclasses 7
values | Currency stringclasses 7
values | Penalty_Amount_USD float64 10k 500k | Volume_Adjustment_Percent float64 -15 15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCEN-00001 | GSA | Shortfall & Remedies — see clause 15-002 in the GSA | Supplier | late start | Operational notice: late start detected; contractual implications under 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) for Supplier. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 15-002. | 15-002 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) the party may be entitled to relief where late start is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 3,737,583 | 10,239.95 | 11,370.24 | 2023-02-25 | 2032-08-07 | Queensland (Australia) | English Law | JKM | JPY | 76,178.16 | 1.83 |
SCEN-00002 | SPA | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the SPA | LNG_Shipowner | nomination mismatch | LNG_Shipowner must decide whether to invoke Pipeline System Rules / Variations (21-016) following nomination mismatch at LNG Shipping assets. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 21-016 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,381,263 | 3,784.28 | 4,270.31 | 2020-07-27 | 2023-07-21 | Texas (US) | English Law | Brent-linked | EUR | 397,135.2 | -14.36 |
SCEN-00003 | SPA | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the SPA | Regulator | weather disruption | Regulator faces weather disruption affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) may apply. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 31-003. | 31-003 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,302,085 | 22,745.44 | 27,925.74 | 2022-09-16 | 2029-05-06 | Japan | Alberta Law | AECO | QAR | 286,758.88 | 13.82 |
SCEN-00004 | Tolling | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the Tolling | Aggregator | payment failure | Aggregator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after payment failure; requires interpretation of 24-002. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 24-002. | 24-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where payment failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,395,364 | 20,261.27 | 22,622.15 | 2020-03-06 | 2026-03-31 | Netherlands | Dutch Law | TTF | JPY | 248,583.53 | -7.14 |
SCEN-00005 | SPA | Ship or Pay / Capacity — see clause 25-002 in the SPA | LNG_Shipowner | nomination mismatch | LNG_Shipowner must decide whether to invoke Ship or Pay / Capacity (25-002) following nomination mismatch at LNG Shipping assets. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 25-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,400,237 | 23,014.35 | 26,989 | 2023-04-15 | 2027-04-06 | UK (England & Wales) | Japanese Law | Henry Hub | CAD | 449,113.28 | 14.93 |
SCEN-00006 | GTA | Measurement — see clause 18-002 in the GTA | Supplier | maintenance outage | Supplier reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after maintenance outage; requires interpretation of 18-002. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 18-002. | 18-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 18-002 (Measurement) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,640,677 | 20,933.36 | 23,211.45 | 2022-06-29 | 2032-12-24 | Netherlands | Texas Law | NBP | JPY | 76,016.52 | -9.2 |
SCEN-00007 | Storage | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the Storage | Regulator | payment failure | Regulator must decide whether to invoke GTA Transporter Obligations (24-002) following payment failure at LNG Shipping assets. | Invoke GTA Transporter Obligations (24-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 24-002 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where payment failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,287,602 | 3,527.68 | 4,513.65 | 2021-12-28 | 2025-12-24 | Texas (US) | English Law | Henry Hub | JPY | 399,909.93 | -3.68 |
SCEN-00008 | GSA | Force Majeure — see clause 32-003 in the GSA | Regulator | weather disruption | Regulator faces weather disruption affecting scheduled deliveries at the Downstream facilities; clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 32-003 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 32-003 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,110,342 | 3,042.03 | 3,875.38 | 2020-12-01 | 2032-04-24 | UK (England & Wales) | Alberta Law | Brent-linked | AUD | 80,552.25 | 5.06 |
SCEN-00009 | SPA | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the SPA | Aggregator | change of law | Aggregator must decide whether to invoke Collateral Support (bank guarantees) (12-011) following change of law at Downstream assets. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 12-011. | 12-011 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where change of law is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,701,465 | 4,661.55 | 6,036.64 | 2022-03-08 | 2032-06-11 | Alberta (Canada) | Dutch Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | QAR | 263,380.71 | 3.89 |
SCEN-00010 | Balancing | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the Balancing | Buyer | third-party failure | Operational notice: third-party failure detected; contractual implications under 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) for Buyer. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 24-002. | 24-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where third-party failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 3,386,155 | 9,277.14 | 11,672.7 | 2023-12-27 | 2036-02-07 | Queensland (Australia) | Texas Law | Brent-linked | AUD | 23,846.44 | 0.65 |
SCEN-00011 | SPA | Ship or Pay / Capacity — see clause 25-002 in the SPA | Shipper | regulatory inquiry | Shipper faces regulatory inquiry affecting scheduled deliveries at the Downstream facilities; clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 25-002. | 25-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,431,084 | 6,660.5 | 7,755.56 | 2022-11-02 | 2030-04-16 | Alberta (Canada) | Japanese Law | Henry Hub | GBP | 205,103.39 | 13.15 |
SCEN-00012 | GSA | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the GSA | Transporter | demand surge | Operational notice: demand surge detected; contractual implications under 26-005 (Nominations) for Transporter. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 26-005. | 26-005 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,768,080 | 15,802.96 | 17,805.09 | 2020-06-20 | 2030-02-12 | Netherlands | New York Law | AECO | GBP | 446,349.82 | 13.06 |
SCEN-00013 | GTA | Good Faith Nominations — see clause 26-006 in the GTA | LNG_Shipowner | demand surge | LNG_Shipowner faces demand surge affecting scheduled deliveries at the LNG Shipping facilities; clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 26-006 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 26-006 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,033,548 | 24,749.45 | 31,137.41 | 2020-09-15 | 2022-11-02 | Queensland (Australia) | Texas Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | JPY | 308,487.31 | -0.17 |
SCEN-00014 | GTA | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the GTA | Trader | third-party failure | Trader must decide whether to invoke Quality Specification (16-003) following third-party failure at LNG Shipping assets. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 16-003. | 16-003 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where third-party failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,294,542 | 22,724.77 | 25,818.41 | 2021-12-03 | 2028-03-27 | Queensland (Australia) | Alberta Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | EUR | 488,842.92 | -13.13 |
SCEN-00015 | SPA | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the SPA | Regulator | quality deviation | Regulator must decide whether to invoke Invoicing & Payment (31-003) following quality deviation at LNG Shipping assets. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 31-003 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,021,660 | 2,799.07 | 3,292.03 | 2022-10-26 | 2032-01-16 | Queensland (Australia) | English Law | Henry Hub | GBP | 297,124.78 | -6.04 |
SCEN-00016 | Tolling | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the Tolling | Trader | missed cargo | Trader reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after missed cargo; requires interpretation of 24-002. | Invoke GTA Transporter Obligations (24-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 24-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where missed cargo is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,513,489 | 26,064.35 | 31,045.18 | 2021-12-05 | 2029-07-01 | Queensland (Australia) | Qatari Law | AECO | JPY | 291,729.7 | 12.69 |
SCEN-00017 | Tolling | Off-Specification Liability — see clause 17-002 in the Tolling | Shipper | demand surge | Shipper faces demand surge affecting scheduled deliveries at the LNG Shipping facilities; clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) may apply. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 17-002. | 17-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,844,742 | 5,054.09 | 6,439.38 | 2022-08-21 | 2036-10-15 | Qatar | New York Law | AECO | USD | 446,850.99 | -8.37 |
SCEN-00018 | GSA | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the GSA | Regulator | demand surge | Operational notice: demand surge detected; contractual implications under 16-003 (Quality Specification) for Regulator. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 16-003. | 16-003 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,956,586 | 27,278.32 | 31,957.24 | 2021-08-06 | 2027-05-13 | Alberta (Canada) | Dutch Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | GBP | 31,269.11 | -14.61 |
SCEN-00019 | Tolling | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the Tolling | Regulator | port congestion | Regulator faces port congestion affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 13-002 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 13-002 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where port congestion is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,480,666 | 4,056.62 | 4,959.51 | 2022-12-16 | 2027-01-08 | Queensland (Australia) | Texas Law | NBP | GBP | 283,127.63 | 9.22 |
SCEN-00020 | Balancing | Shortfall & Remedies — see clause 15-002 in the Balancing | LNG_Shipowner | third-party failure | LNG_Shipowner faces third-party failure affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 15-002. | 15-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) the party may be entitled to relief where third-party failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,185,579 | 14,207.07 | 16,180.32 | 2021-12-31 | 2027-06-13 | Netherlands | Texas Law | JKM | JPY | 113,698.73 | -7.76 |
SCEN-00021 | Balancing | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the Balancing | Shipper | change of law | Shipper reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after change of law; requires interpretation of 21-016. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 21-016. | 21-016 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where change of law is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,284,385 | 25,436.67 | 29,234.53 | 2020-03-02 | 2023-02-07 | Texas (US) | Texas Law | TTF | JPY | 444,511.42 | 10.59 |
SCEN-00022 | GSA | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the GSA | Shipper | maintenance outage | Shipper must decide whether to invoke GTA Transporter Obligations (24-002) following maintenance outage at Downstream assets. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 24-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,926,007 | 13,495.91 | 15,963.74 | 2024-05-28 | 2029-10-31 | Alberta (Canada) | Japanese Law | Brent-linked | GBP | 260,171.12 | 12.6 |
SCEN-00023 | SPA | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the SPA | LNG_Shipowner | nomination mismatch | LNG_Shipowner faces nomination mismatch affecting scheduled deliveries at the LNG Shipping facilities; clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) may apply. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 21-016. | 21-016 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,696,799 | 4,648.76 | 5,541.42 | 2024-02-06 | 2028-06-29 | Japan | English Law | NBP | EUR | 432,453.92 | 1.55 |
SCEN-00024 | GSA | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the GSA | Trader | maintenance outage | Trader must decide whether to invoke Quality Specification (16-003) following maintenance outage at Midstream assets. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 16-003. | 16-003 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,131,820 | 16,799.51 | 19,570.97 | 2024-12-17 | 2029-02-01 | UK (England & Wales) | English Law | AECO | QAR | 50,557.53 | 5.06 |
SCEN-00025 | GSA | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the GSA | Buyer | weather disruption | Buyer faces weather disruption affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 13-002. | 13-002 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,581,193 | 7,071.76 | 8,387.4 | 2020-07-20 | 2025-10-31 | Alberta (Canada) | Qatari Law | TTF | USD | 108,402.31 | -2.86 |
SCEN-00026 | GTA | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the GTA | Storage_Operator | nomination mismatch | Storage_Operator must decide whether to invoke Take or Pay / Take and Pay (13-002) following nomination mismatch at Upstream assets. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 13-002. | 13-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 3,743,845 | 10,257.11 | 11,576.19 | 2021-04-26 | 2032-12-27 | Queensland (Australia) | Texas Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | CAD | 340,886.05 | -6.25 |
SCEN-00027 | SPA | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the SPA | Supplier | pipeline failure | Supplier reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after pipeline failure; requires interpretation of 12-011. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 12-011. | 12-011 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where pipeline failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,957,386 | 21,801.06 | 26,617.76 | 2023-02-15 | 2025-02-20 | Texas (US) | New York Law | NBP | CAD | 386,036.13 | 10.79 |
SCEN-00028 | GSA | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the GSA | Trader | storage shortfall | Trader reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after storage shortfall; requires interpretation of 24-002. | Invoke GTA Transporter Obligations (24-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 24-002 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,057,204 | 19,334.81 | 21,281 | 2021-12-17 | 2030-12-27 | Japan | Texas Law | AECO | GBP | 181,765.77 | 7.77 |
SCEN-00029 | Balancing | Measurement — see clause 18-002 in the Balancing | Buyer | overrun | Operational notice: overrun detected; contractual implications under 18-002 (Measurement) for Buyer. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 18-002. | 18-002 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 18-002 (Measurement) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,320,959 | 6,358.79 | 7,913.26 | 2022-03-28 | 2025-10-26 | Qatar | Japanese Law | AECO | CAD | 219,411.94 | -0.57 |
SCEN-00030 | SPA | Make Up / Carry Forward — see clause 14-002 in the SPA | Regulator | demand surge | Regulator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after demand surge; requires interpretation of 14-002. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 14-002. | 14-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 14-002 (Make Up / Carry Forward) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 3,069,278 | 8,408.98 | 10,751.32 | 2020-10-06 | 2025-01-13 | Japan | New York Law | NBP | USD | 46,060.14 | -13.3 |
SCEN-00031 | Storage | Shortfall & Remedies — see clause 15-002 in the Storage | Regulator | payment failure | Regulator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after payment failure; requires interpretation of 15-002. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 15-002. | 15-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) the party may be entitled to relief where payment failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,649,057 | 4,517.96 | 5,797.77 | 2023-09-26 | 2037-09-24 | Netherlands | Qatari Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | USD | 150,580.38 | 9.03 |
SCEN-00032 | Tolling | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the Tolling | Supplier | nomination mismatch | Supplier must decide whether to invoke Invoicing & Payment (31-003) following nomination mismatch at Upstream assets. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 31-003. | 31-003 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,458,283 | 25,913.1 | 29,438.81 | 2024-08-01 | 2034-08-18 | Netherlands | English Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | EUR | 453,158.86 | -3.38 |
SCEN-00033 | SPA | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the SPA | Supplier | payment failure | Supplier must decide whether to invoke Take or Pay / Take and Pay (13-002) following payment failure at Upstream assets. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 13-002. | 13-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where payment failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,366,642 | 22,922.31 | 25,512.16 | 2024-05-11 | 2035-02-08 | Alberta (Canada) | Japanese Law | JKM | CAD | 21,675.41 | 8.74 |
SCEN-00034 | Storage | Ship or Pay / Capacity — see clause 25-002 in the Storage | Supplier | regulatory inquiry | Operational notice: regulatory inquiry detected; contractual implications under 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) for Supplier. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 25-002. | 25-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,934,124 | 27,216.78 | 33,561.46 | 2023-09-17 | 2033-04-17 | Queensland (Australia) | Alberta Law | AECO | QAR | 160,975.85 | 11.41 |
SCEN-00035 | GTA | Off-Specification Liability — see clause 17-002 in the GTA | Storage_Operator | pipeline failure | Storage_Operator must decide whether to invoke Off-Specification Liability (17-002) following pipeline failure at Upstream assets. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 17-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) the party may be entitled to relief where pipeline failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,612,578 | 7,157.75 | 9,060.69 | 2020-04-06 | 2034-08-05 | Japan | Qatari Law | NBP | AUD | 229,998.09 | 13.95 |
SCEN-00036 | GTA | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the GTA | LNG_Shipowner | regulatory inquiry | LNG_Shipowner faces regulatory inquiry affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 16-003 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 16-003 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,295,267 | 25,466.48 | 31,585.09 | 2020-03-28 | 2034-03-27 | Japan | Qatari Law | Henry Hub | EUR | 112,034.08 | -13.93 |
SCEN-00037 | GTA | Conditions Precedent / Effective Date — see clause 7-006 in the GTA | LNG_Shipowner | weather disruption | Operational notice: weather disruption detected; contractual implications under 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) for LNG_Shipowner. | Initiate force majeure notice under 7-006 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 7-006 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,751,724 | 18,497.87 | 20,732.16 | 2022-04-08 | 2033-11-17 | Queensland (Australia) | Dutch Law | Brent-linked | AUD | 31,317.55 | -10.43 |
SCEN-00038 | SPA | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the SPA | Regulator | storage shortfall | Regulator faces storage shortfall affecting scheduled deliveries at the LNG Shipping facilities; clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) may apply. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 12-011 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,526,829 | 15,142 | 18,657.42 | 2021-01-11 | 2034-12-29 | Qatar | Alberta Law | JKM | QAR | 279,374 | 14.74 |
SCEN-00039 | GTA | Make Up / Carry Forward — see clause 14-002 in the GTA | Buyer | port congestion | Buyer reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after port congestion; requires interpretation of 14-002. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 14-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 14-002 (Make Up / Carry Forward) the party may be entitled to relief where port congestion is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,054,306 | 13,847.41 | 16,261.47 | 2024-08-22 | 2039-01-01 | UK (England & Wales) | Dutch Law | Brent-linked | QAR | 405,920.77 | -1.04 |
SCEN-00040 | Storage | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the Storage | Trader | measurement discrepancy | Trader faces measurement discrepancy affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 13-002. | 13-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where measurement discrepancy is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,666,413 | 21,003.87 | 25,890.62 | 2024-06-30 | 2034-11-06 | Queensland (Australia) | English Law | Henry Hub | EUR | 453,096.3 | 14.31 |
SCEN-00041 | Storage | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the Storage | LNG_Shipowner | price spike | LNG_Shipowner reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after price spike; requires interpretation of 12-011. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 12-011. | 12-011 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where price spike is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,226,538 | 14,319.28 | 16,654.19 | 2024-12-06 | 2038-09-16 | Japan | Texas Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | CAD | 306,313.46 | 10.33 |
SCEN-00042 | GSA | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the GSA | Storage_Operator | quality deviation | Storage_Operator must decide whether to invoke Nominations (26-005) following quality deviation at Upstream assets. | Initiate force majeure notice under 26-005 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 26-005 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,005,641 | 10,974.36 | 12,160.73 | 2023-12-27 | 2029-03-17 | Qatar | Dutch Law | Brent-linked | JPY | 82,113.38 | 4.47 |
SCEN-00043 | Storage | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the Storage | Aggregator | missed cargo | Aggregator faces missed cargo affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) may apply. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 12-011. | 12-011 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where missed cargo is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 3,128,560 | 8,571.4 | 11,120.79 | 2022-08-21 | 2028-02-17 | Japan | Texas Law | Brent-linked | USD | 257,415.08 | -1.84 |
SCEN-00044 | Tolling | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the Tolling | Storage_Operator | change of law | Storage_Operator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after change of law; requires interpretation of 16-003. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 16-003. | 16-003 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where change of law is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,906,504 | 13,442.48 | 15,086.9 | 2021-11-01 | 2033-10-11 | Qatar | Texas Law | Brent-linked | USD | 359,709.48 | -4.42 |
SCEN-00045 | GSA | Measurement — see clause 18-002 in the GSA | Aggregator | regulatory inquiry | Aggregator faces regulatory inquiry affecting scheduled deliveries at the Downstream facilities; clause 18-002 (Measurement) may apply. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 18-002. | 18-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 18-002 (Measurement) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,422,163 | 6,636.06 | 8,198.42 | 2023-08-31 | 2035-09-23 | Qatar | New York Law | NBP | CAD | 239,759.04 | 4.18 |
SCEN-00046 | Balancing | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the Balancing | Buyer | late start | Buyer must decide whether to invoke Pipeline System Rules / Variations (21-016) following late start at Downstream assets. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 21-016. | 21-016 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where late start is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,621,959 | 4,443.72 | 5,002.33 | 2021-02-25 | 2024-03-15 | Netherlands | Alberta Law | Henry Hub | GBP | 263,376.38 | 3 |
SCEN-00047 | GTA | Make Up / Carry Forward — see clause 14-002 in the GTA | Storage_Operator | nomination mismatch | Operational notice: nomination mismatch detected; contractual implications under 14-002 (Make Up / Carry Forward) for Storage_Operator. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 14-002. | 14-002 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 14-002 (Make Up / Carry Forward) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,611,164 | 4,414.15 | 4,920.23 | 2022-04-29 | 2035-04-11 | Alberta (Canada) | Alberta Law | TTF | AUD | 259,737.38 | -3.73 |
SCEN-00048 | GSA | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the GSA | Shipper | storage shortfall | Shipper faces storage shortfall affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) may apply. | Invoke Take or Pay / Take and Pay (13-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 13-002 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,326,379 | 25,551.72 | 30,338.94 | 2023-08-14 | 2035-09-04 | Texas (US) | Qatari Law | JKM | QAR | 229,214.89 | -13.79 |
SCEN-00049 | GSA | Off-Specification Liability — see clause 17-002 in the GSA | Aggregator | change of law | Aggregator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after change of law; requires interpretation of 17-002. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 17-002. | 17-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) the party may be entitled to relief where change of law is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 756,149 | 2,071.64 | 2,441.15 | 2021-01-14 | 2025-10-01 | Queensland (Australia) | Alberta Law | TTF | JPY | 167,461.62 | 9.76 |
SCEN-00050 | Storage | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the Storage | Regulator | price spike | Operational notice: price spike detected; contractual implications under 16-003 (Quality Specification) for Regulator. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 16-003. | 16-003 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where price spike is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,464,570 | 23,190.6 | 26,474.34 | 2020-03-11 | 2032-10-01 | Queensland (Australia) | New York Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | QAR | 127,954.21 | -0.72 |
SCEN-00051 | Tolling | Measurement — see clause 18-002 in the Tolling | Transporter | third-party failure | Transporter faces third-party failure affecting scheduled deliveries at the Downstream facilities; clause 18-002 (Measurement) may apply. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 18-002 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 18-002 (Measurement) the party may be entitled to relief where third-party failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,336,933 | 20,101.19 | 23,290.98 | 2021-07-06 | 2033-04-18 | UK (England & Wales) | Dutch Law | JKM | QAR | 329,138.81 | 10.99 |
SCEN-00052 | GTA | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the GTA | LNG_Shipowner | port congestion | Operational notice: port congestion detected; contractual implications under 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) for LNG_Shipowner. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 13-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where port congestion is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,719,385 | 12,929.82 | 15,798.98 | 2024-06-05 | 2037-11-05 | Japan | English Law | Brent-linked | EUR | 307,624.86 | 8.31 |
SCEN-00053 | SPA | Conditions Precedent / Effective Date — see clause 7-006 in the SPA | LNG_Shipowner | nomination mismatch | LNG_Shipowner reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after nomination mismatch; requires interpretation of 7-006. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 7-006. | 7-006 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) the party may be entitled to relief where nomination mismatch is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,890,608 | 27,097.56 | 31,673.21 | 2023-07-19 | 2028-07-26 | Netherlands | English Law | JKM | AUD | 298,074.28 | -10.81 |
SCEN-00054 | GTA | Good Faith Nominations — see clause 26-006 in the GTA | Buyer | third-party failure | Buyer must decide whether to invoke Good Faith Nominations (26-006) following third-party failure at Midstream assets. | Invoke Good Faith Nominations (26-006) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 26-006 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where third-party failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,626,507 | 20,894.54 | 24,275.68 | 2023-04-19 | 2026-05-25 | Netherlands | Qatari Law | TTF | CAD | 461,754.79 | -9.25 |
SCEN-00055 | GSA | Conditions Precedent / Effective Date — see clause 7-006 in the GSA | Buyer | overrun | Buyer faces overrun affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) may apply. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 7-006 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,293,915 | 3,544.97 | 4,546.63 | 2021-12-12 | 2028-10-11 | Queensland (Australia) | English Law | NBP | USD | 223,212.59 | -12.16 |
SCEN-00056 | SPA | Off-Specification Liability — see clause 17-002 in the SPA | Transporter | force majeure | Transporter reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after force majeure; requires interpretation of 17-002. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 17-002. | 17-002 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) the party may be entitled to relief where force majeure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,028,056 | 16,515.22 | 20,604.06 | 2024-04-15 | 2029-02-25 | Alberta (Canada) | Dutch Law | NBP | EUR | 478,970.64 | 3.46 |
SCEN-00057 | Balancing | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the Balancing | Buyer | price spike | Operational notice: price spike detected; contractual implications under 26-005 (Nominations) for Buyer. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 26-005. | 26-005 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where price spike is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,898,861 | 27,120.17 | 33,019.05 | 2022-11-01 | 2028-02-11 | Queensland (Australia) | Dutch Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | EUR | 472,414.55 | -9.08 |
SCEN-00058 | Tolling | Good Faith Nominations — see clause 26-006 in the Tolling | Shipper | force majeure | Shipper faces force majeure affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) may apply. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 26-006. | 26-006 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where force majeure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,697,372 | 7,390.06 | 9,071.61 | 2023-07-08 | 2034-08-08 | Qatar | English Law | Brent-linked | QAR | 123,552.76 | 3.61 |
SCEN-00059 | GTA | Good Faith Nominations — see clause 26-006 in the GTA | Aggregator | maintenance outage | Aggregator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after maintenance outage; requires interpretation of 26-006. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 26-006 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,395,529 | 12,042.55 | 13,975.36 | 2023-09-14 | 2027-09-24 | Alberta (Canada) | Japanese Law | NBP | USD | 249,255.13 | -9.43 |
SCEN-00060 | Balancing | Good Faith Nominations — see clause 26-006 in the Balancing | LNG_Shipowner | regulatory inquiry | LNG_Shipowner faces regulatory inquiry affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 26-006 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 26-006 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,708,874 | 4,681.85 | 5,910.69 | 2021-06-26 | 2030-12-23 | Japan | Texas Law | Henry Hub | CAD | 368,695.43 | 10.52 |
SCEN-00061 | Balancing | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the Balancing | Storage_Operator | storage shortfall | Storage_Operator must decide whether to invoke Quality Specification (16-003) following storage shortfall at Upstream assets. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 16-003. | 16-003 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,376,543 | 3,771.35 | 4,155.42 | 2023-03-21 | 2037-01-13 | Alberta (Canada) | Alberta Law | TTF | GBP | 359,701.05 | -3.77 |
SCEN-00062 | SPA | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the SPA | Buyer | quality deviation | Buyer reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after quality deviation; requires interpretation of 26-005. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 26-005. | 26-005 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,252,035 | 22,608.32 | 27,922.44 | 2022-07-16 | 2027-10-04 | Qatar | Dutch Law | NBP | AUD | 129,486.94 | 9.18 |
SCEN-00063 | Tolling | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the Tolling | Regulator | storage shortfall | Regulator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after storage shortfall; requires interpretation of 31-003. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 31-003. | 31-003 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,845,690 | 26,974.49 | 30,888.26 | 2020-01-12 | 2027-03-18 | Netherlands | Dutch Law | Brent-linked | AUD | 302,925.01 | -10.36 |
SCEN-00064 | Balancing | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the Balancing | Trader | demand surge | Operational notice: demand surge detected; contractual implications under 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) for Trader. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 24-002. | 24-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,766,124 | 4,838.7 | 5,584.7 | 2020-02-16 | 2027-12-11 | Queensland (Australia) | Texas Law | Henry Hub | CAD | 250,850.03 | 5.09 |
SCEN-00065 | Storage | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the Storage | Buyer | quality deviation | Operational notice: quality deviation detected; contractual implications under 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) for Buyer. | Invoke GTA Transporter Obligations (24-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 24-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,484,117 | 12,285.25 | 15,906.13 | 2022-02-20 | 2036-10-08 | Japan | Texas Law | JKM | USD | 350,061.41 | -5.25 |
SCEN-00066 | Tolling | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the Tolling | Storage_Operator | maintenance outage | Storage_Operator must decide whether to invoke Pipeline System Rules / Variations (21-016) following maintenance outage at Upstream assets. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 21-016. | 21-016 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,560,622 | 20,714.03 | 25,350.43 | 2022-07-25 | 2036-10-01 | Queensland (Australia) | New York Law | TTF | QAR | 37,134.77 | -10.55 |
SCEN-00067 | GTA | Force Majeure — see clause 32-003 in the GTA | Aggregator | weather disruption | Aggregator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after weather disruption; requires interpretation of 32-003. | Initiate force majeure notice under 32-003 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 32-003 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,187,826 | 3,254.32 | 3,929.83 | 2023-11-11 | 2027-05-04 | Japan | New York Law | NBP | USD | 245,337.73 | 3.8 |
SCEN-00068 | GTA | Make Up / Carry Forward — see clause 14-002 in the GTA | Trader | change of law | Trader reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after change of law; requires interpretation of 14-002. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 14-002. | 14-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 14-002 (Make Up / Carry Forward) the party may be entitled to relief where change of law is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,876,215 | 24,318.4 | 29,796.45 | 2020-03-12 | 2033-10-13 | Netherlands | Japanese Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | CAD | 156,663.23 | 10.82 |
SCEN-00069 | SPA | Take or Pay / Take and Pay — see clause 13-002 in the SPA | LNG_Shipowner | overrun | LNG_Shipowner faces overrun affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 13-002 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 13-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 13-002 (Take or Pay / Take and Pay) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,360,950 | 17,427.26 | 22,147.78 | 2022-01-17 | 2026-06-06 | Alberta (Canada) | English Law | Brent-linked | CAD | 359,080.17 | -14.38 |
SCEN-00070 | GTA | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the GTA | LNG_Shipowner | overrun | LNG_Shipowner reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after overrun; requires interpretation of 24-002. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 24-002. | 24-002 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,597,981 | 18,076.66 | 20,773.55 | 2024-10-26 | 2033-08-13 | Alberta (Canada) | Dutch Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | QAR | 298,264.72 | -5.69 |
SCEN-00071 | Tolling | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the Tolling | Regulator | weather disruption | Regulator must decide whether to invoke Quality Specification (16-003) following weather disruption at Downstream assets. | Initiate force majeure notice under 16-003 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 16-003 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,870,606 | 5,124.95 | 6,083.21 | 2023-08-15 | 2028-08-06 | Alberta (Canada) | Texas Law | AECO | USD | 34,246.09 | -4.18 |
SCEN-00072 | GTA | Force Majeure — see clause 32-003 in the GTA | Transporter | overrun | Operational notice: overrun detected; contractual implications under 32-003 (Force Majeure) for Transporter. | Invoke Force Majeure (32-003) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 32-003 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,851,487 | 7,812.29 | 8,807.26 | 2020-09-17 | 2028-08-03 | Qatar | New York Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | JPY | 295,311.12 | -3.53 |
SCEN-00073 | SPA | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the SPA | Transporter | quality deviation | Transporter must decide whether to invoke Nominations (26-005) following quality deviation at Upstream assets. | Initiate force majeure notice under 26-005 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 26-005 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,274,441 | 11,710.8 | 15,137.15 | 2023-10-08 | 2034-07-20 | Japan | Texas Law | TTF | CAD | 41,609.44 | 14.25 |
SCEN-00074 | Balancing | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the Balancing | LNG_Shipowner | quality deviation | LNG_Shipowner faces quality deviation affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) may apply. | Invoke Quality Specification (16-003) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 16-003 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 2,258,492 | 6,187.65 | 7,347.75 | 2023-10-27 | 2026-08-28 | Queensland (Australia) | Japanese Law | AECO | JPY | 177,413.98 | -1.26 |
SCEN-00075 | GSA | Off-Specification Liability — see clause 17-002 in the GSA | Supplier | pipeline failure | Supplier faces pipeline failure affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) may apply. | Invoke Off-Specification Liability (17-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 17-002 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 17-002 (Off-Specification Liability) the party may be entitled to relief where pipeline failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,864,435 | 24,286.12 | 27,890.38 | 2023-08-18 | 2029-11-23 | Alberta (Canada) | Dutch Law | NBP | GBP | 378,282.86 | -1.73 |
SCEN-00076 | Balancing | Quality Specification — see clause 16-003 in the Balancing | Transporter | weather disruption | Transporter faces weather disruption affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 16-003. | 16-003 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 16-003 (Quality Specification) the party may be entitled to relief where weather disruption is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,592,166 | 4,362.1 | 4,893.33 | 2022-09-07 | 2030-01-06 | Qatar | New York Law | JKM | AUD | 41,143.6 | 7.27 |
SCEN-00077 | GTA | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the GTA | Aggregator | missed cargo | Aggregator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after missed cargo; requires interpretation of 31-003. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 31-003. | 31-003 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where missed cargo is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,786,268 | 21,332.24 | 24,772.83 | 2024-11-18 | 2032-11-03 | Alberta (Canada) | New York Law | NBP | USD | 128,660.08 | -14.88 |
SCEN-00078 | GSA | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the GSA | Shipper | missed cargo | Shipper must decide whether to invoke Collateral Support (bank guarantees) (12-011) following missed cargo at Downstream assets. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 12-011. | 12-011 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where missed cargo is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,249,195 | 3,422.45 | 4,223.63 | 2023-12-21 | 2032-03-28 | Texas (US) | Qatari Law | Brent-linked | AUD | 264,852.98 | 8.79 |
SCEN-00079 | Tolling | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the Tolling | Trader | third-party failure | Trader faces third-party failure affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) may apply. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 31-003 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where third-party failure is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,446,531 | 23,141.18 | 25,921.96 | 2024-05-21 | 2027-08-15 | Netherlands | Texas Law | Henry Hub | USD | 242,075.07 | -9.09 |
SCEN-00080 | Storage | Ship or Pay / Capacity — see clause 25-002 in the Storage | Transporter | storage shortfall | Transporter must decide whether to invoke Ship or Pay / Capacity (25-002) following storage shortfall at Midstream assets. | Invoke Ship or Pay / Capacity (25-002) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 25-002 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,589,825 | 18,054.32 | 20,952.43 | 2024-11-17 | 2039-11-13 | Alberta (Canada) | Dutch Law | NBP | JPY | 137,275.72 | 12.97 |
SCEN-00081 | Balancing | Shortfall & Remedies — see clause 15-002 in the Balancing | Regulator | port congestion | Regulator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after port congestion; requires interpretation of 15-002. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 15-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) the party may be entitled to relief where port congestion is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,666,810 | 4,566.6 | 5,447.58 | 2022-08-06 | 2032-03-09 | UK (England & Wales) | Dutch Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | AUD | 77,559.22 | 14.71 |
SCEN-00082 | Storage | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the Storage | Aggregator | overrun | Operational notice: overrun detected; contractual implications under 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) for Aggregator. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 21-016. | 21-016 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,943,071 | 21,761.84 | 25,917.25 | 2021-02-10 | 2028-02-20 | Qatar | Dutch Law | TTF | CAD | 45,255.56 | -0.86 |
SCEN-00083 | Storage | Good Faith Nominations — see clause 26-006 in the Storage | Transporter | change of law | Operational notice: change of law detected; contractual implications under 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) for Transporter. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 26-006. | 26-006 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 26-006 (Good Faith Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where change of law is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 6,118,811 | 16,763.87 | 20,898.48 | 2023-10-01 | 2038-02-01 | Netherlands | Qatari Law | Brent-linked | GBP | 365,472.52 | -11.77 |
SCEN-00084 | SPA | GTA Transporter Obligations — see clause 24-002 in the SPA | LNG_Shipowner | price spike | Operational notice: price spike detected; contractual implications under 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) for LNG_Shipowner. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 24-002. | 24-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 24-002 (GTA Transporter Obligations) the party may be entitled to relief where price spike is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,441,860 | 3,950.3 | 5,105.99 | 2021-05-22 | 2025-04-18 | Qatar | English Law | NBP | QAR | 296,209.53 | -6.55 |
SCEN-00085 | Balancing | Shortfall & Remedies — see clause 15-002 in the Balancing | LNG_Shipowner | maintenance outage | Operational notice: maintenance outage detected; contractual implications under 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) for LNG_Shipowner. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 15-002. | 15-002 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 15-002 (Shortfall & Remedies) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,540,536 | 12,439.82 | 15,720.44 | 2022-03-16 | 2032-07-09 | Japan | Japanese Law | Henry Hub | JPY | 27,097.03 | 10.9 |
SCEN-00086 | Balancing | Measurement — see clause 18-002 in the Balancing | Aggregator | measurement discrepancy | Operational notice: measurement discrepancy detected; contractual implications under 18-002 (Measurement) for Aggregator. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 18-002. | 18-002 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 18-002 (Measurement) the party may be entitled to relief where measurement discrepancy is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,748,601 | 4,790.69 | 5,446.53 | 2024-11-05 | 2033-08-02 | Alberta (Canada) | New York Law | NBP | JPY | 49,652.12 | -4.31 |
SCEN-00087 | GSA | Force Majeure — see clause 32-003 in the GSA | Storage_Operator | quality deviation | Storage_Operator faces quality deviation affecting scheduled deliveries at the Downstream facilities; clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 32-003 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 32-003 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) the party may be entitled to relief where quality deviation is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,640,433 | 12,713.52 | 16,054.2 | 2021-03-30 | 2033-01-24 | Netherlands | Japanese Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | AUD | 162,984.49 | 8.09 |
SCEN-00088 | GTA | Force Majeure — see clause 32-003 in the GTA | Storage_Operator | missed cargo | Operational notice: missed cargo detected; contractual implications under 32-003 (Force Majeure) for Storage_Operator. | Invoke Force Majeure (32-003) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 32-003 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) the party may be entitled to relief where missed cargo is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,110,340 | 3,042.03 | 3,811.73 | 2024-03-06 | 2039-01-22 | Queensland (Australia) | Alberta Law | JKM | QAR | 416,661.97 | -14.34 |
SCEN-00089 | GTA | Invoicing & Payment — see clause 31-003 in the GTA | Buyer | regulatory inquiry | Buyer faces regulatory inquiry affecting scheduled deliveries at the Upstream facilities; clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) may apply. | Initiate force majeure notice under 31-003 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 31-003 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 31-003 (Invoicing & Payment) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,362,121 | 14,690.74 | 16,694.15 | 2023-10-01 | 2037-07-23 | Texas (US) | English Law | JKM | EUR | 216,618.58 | -0.4 |
SCEN-00090 | SPA | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the SPA | Regulator | measurement discrepancy | Regulator must decide whether to invoke Pipeline System Rules / Variations (21-016) following measurement discrepancy at LNG Shipping assets. | Invoke Pipeline System Rules / Variations (21-016) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 21-016 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where measurement discrepancy is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,590,574 | 15,316.64 | 17,379.27 | 2023-03-26 | 2025-08-27 | Netherlands | Dutch Law | Brent-linked | JPY | 452,692.64 | 8.58 |
SCEN-00091 | Tolling | Conditions Precedent / Effective Date — see clause 7-006 in the Tolling | Buyer | overrun | Buyer reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after overrun; requires interpretation of 7-006. | Invoke Conditions Precedent / Effective Date (7-006) and propose ACQ adjustment or relief. | 7-006 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,123,873 | 22,257.19 | 27,907.98 | 2024-09-10 | 2029-11-15 | Japan | Japanese Law | Brent-linked | GBP | 403,228.86 | -0.85 |
SCEN-00092 | Tolling | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the Tolling | Trader | demand surge | Trader must decide whether to invoke Nominations (26-005) following demand surge at Downstream assets. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 26-005. | 26-005 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where demand surge is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,813,399 | 13,187.39 | 15,051.01 | 2024-10-08 | 2037-06-26 | UK (England & Wales) | Dutch Law | Henry Hub | QAR | 196,943.16 | 2.04 |
SCEN-00093 | Balancing | Force Majeure — see clause 32-003 in the Balancing | Transporter | measurement discrepancy | Operational notice: measurement discrepancy detected; contractual implications under 32-003 (Force Majeure) for Transporter. | Implement contingency transport (re-route or substitute shipper) and apply overrun/penalty rules. | 32-003 | Adjusted nominations; penalty avoided; volumes reallocated to alternate buyer. | Under clause 32-003 (Force Majeure) the party may be entitled to relief where measurement discrepancy is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 9,285,794 | 25,440.53 | 29,008.66 | 2024-05-07 | 2038-04-03 | Netherlands | Qatari Law | Dutch Title Transfer Facility | QAR | 136,359.27 | -6.42 |
SCEN-00094 | GSA | Collateral Support (bank guarantees) — see clause 12-011 in the GSA | Supplier | maintenance outage | Supplier reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after maintenance outage; requires interpretation of 12-011. | Seek collateral support enforcement or re-guarantee per 12-011. | 12-011 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 12-011 (Collateral Support (bank guarantees)) the party may be entitled to relief where maintenance outage is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,365,362 | 11,959.9 | 15,116.81 | 2023-09-27 | 2034-07-12 | UK (England & Wales) | Dutch Law | Henry Hub | GBP | 328,459.14 | 10.61 |
SCEN-00095 | Balancing | Ship or Pay / Capacity — see clause 25-002 in the Balancing | LNG_Shipowner | price spike | LNG_Shipowner faces price spike affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 25-002. | 25-002 | Measurement variance reconciled; invoice corrected; payment dispute avoided. | Under clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) the party may be entitled to relief where price spike is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 7,176,196 | 19,660.81 | 24,908.14 | 2021-02-27 | 2024-05-12 | Texas (US) | Texas Law | Henry Hub | GBP | 454,428.2 | 14.74 |
SCEN-00096 | GTA | Conditions Precedent / Effective Date — see clause 7-006 in the GTA | Trader | late start | Trader faces late start affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) may apply. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 7-006. | 7-006 | Shortfall remedy applied; buyer compensated at shortfall price discount; contractual breach avoided. | Under clause 7-006 (Conditions Precedent / Effective Date) the party may be entitled to relief where late start is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 874,689 | 2,396.41 | 2,773.75 | 2024-10-16 | 2039-02-08 | Queensland (Australia) | Japanese Law | AECO | EUR | 200,714.85 | 4.61 |
SCEN-00097 | GSA | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the GSA | Shipper | late start | Shipper must decide whether to invoke Pipeline System Rules / Variations (21-016) following late start at Upstream assets. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 21-016. | 21-016 | Transport re-route executed; incremental tariff applied; service continuity preserved. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where late start is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 5,425,061 | 14,863.18 | 16,728.09 | 2023-11-09 | 2036-02-29 | Netherlands | New York Law | AECO | JPY | 139,953.69 | -4.92 |
SCEN-00098 | Tolling | Nominations — see clause 26-005 in the Tolling | Buyer | regulatory inquiry | Buyer faces regulatory inquiry affecting scheduled deliveries at the Midstream facilities; clause 26-005 (Nominations) may apply. | Adjust nominations and reallocate volumes between counterparties per 26-005. | 26-005 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 26-005 (Nominations) the party may be entitled to relief where regulatory inquiry is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 4,446,852 | 12,183.16 | 14,618.36 | 2020-12-12 | 2029-01-03 | Netherlands | Texas Law | NBP | USD | 491,869.76 | -6.46 |
SCEN-00099 | Storage | Ship or Pay / Capacity — see clause 25-002 in the Storage | Buyer | storage shortfall | Buyer reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after storage shortfall; requires interpretation of 25-002. | Initiate measurement reconciliation, adjust invoicing and apply cash-out under 25-002. | 25-002 | ACQ adjusted for force majeure; make-up entitlement scheduled next period. | Under clause 25-002 (Ship or Pay / Capacity) the party may be entitled to relief where storage shortfall is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 1,600,653 | 4,385.35 | 5,414.15 | 2023-05-10 | 2026-05-27 | Queensland (Australia) | Alberta Law | TTF | QAR | 453,196.1 | -9.65 |
SCEN-00100 | Balancing | Pipeline System Rules / Variations — see clause 21-016 in the Balancing | Aggregator | overrun | Aggregator reports mismatch between nominations and actual flow after overrun; requires interpretation of 21-016. | Initiate force majeure notice under 21-016 and coordinate with transporter and buyer. | 21-016 | Collateral draw executed; credit exposure reduced; deliveries resumed. | Under clause 21-016 (Pipeline System Rules / Variations) the party may be entitled to relief where overrun is beyond its control. The recommended decision balances contractual remedy (e.g., ACQ adjustment or make-up) against operational feasibility and counterparty exposure. | 8,850,325 | 24,247.47 | 27,762.15 | 2024-10-26 | 2039-05-29 | UK (England & Wales) | Alberta Law | AECO | QAR | 458,766.7 | 5.62 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.