tbg-cot-bench / scripts /generate_experiment_report.py
CHML-real's picture
Upload TBG-CoT benchmark dataset to Hugging Face
797eb32
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
8.77 kB
import csv
from pathlib import Path
from datetime import datetime
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
RESULTS = ROOT / "results"
REPORTS = ROOT / "reports"
FIGURES = ROOT / "figures"
REPORTS.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
OUT = REPORTS / "tbg_cot_experiment_report.md"
def read_metric_file(path: Path) -> dict:
metrics = {}
if not path.exists():
return metrics
with path.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
reader = csv.DictReader(f)
for row in reader:
try:
metrics[row["metric"]] = float(row["value"])
except Exception:
continue
return metrics
def read_rows(path: Path) -> list[dict]:
if not path.exists():
return []
with path.open("r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
return list(csv.DictReader(f))
def fmt(value, digits=4):
if value is None:
return "N/A"
try:
return f"{float(value):.{digits}f}"
except Exception:
return str(value)
def method_rows():
baseline = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "converter_eval_summary.csv")
scenario = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "ollama_eval_summary.csv")
stepwise = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "stepwise_ollama_eval_summary.csv")
order_v3 = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "order_v3_eval_summary.csv")
cumulative_v4 = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "cumulative_v4_eval_summary.csv")
return [
{
"method": "Rule-based baseline converter",
"parse_success": 1.0 if baseline else None,
"primary_metric": "direction_accuracy",
"primary_value": baseline.get("direction_accuracy"),
"secondary": f"strength_mae={fmt(baseline.get('strength_mae'))}, source_weight_mae={fmt(baseline.get('source_weight_mae'))}",
"coverage": f"{int(baseline.get('num_steps', 0))}/52",
},
{
"method": "EXAONE scenario-level CoT",
"parse_success": scenario.get("num_evaluated_steps", 0) / 52.0 if scenario else None,
"primary_metric": "direction_accuracy",
"primary_value": scenario.get("direction_accuracy"),
"secondary": f"confidence_mae={fmt(scenario.get('confidence_mae'))}, verdict_accuracy={fmt(scenario.get('verdict_accuracy'))}",
"coverage": f"{int(scenario.get('num_evaluated_steps', 0))}/52",
},
{
"method": "EXAONE step-wise evidence v2.1",
"parse_success": stepwise.get("parse_success_rate"),
"primary_metric": "direction_accuracy",
"primary_value": stepwise.get("direction_accuracy"),
"secondary": f"confidence_mae={fmt(stepwise.get('confidence_mae'))}, verdict_accuracy={fmt(stepwise.get('verdict_accuracy'))}",
"coverage": f"{int(stepwise.get('num_parsed_steps', 0))}/52",
},
{
"method": "EXAONE order-classification v3",
"parse_success": order_v3.get("parse_success_rate"),
"primary_metric": "direction_accuracy",
"primary_value": order_v3.get("direction_accuracy"),
"secondary": f"confidence_mae={fmt(order_v3.get('confidence_mae'))}, verdict_accuracy={fmt(order_v3.get('verdict_accuracy'))}",
"coverage": f"{int(order_v3.get('num_parsed_steps', 0))}/52",
},
{
"method": "EXAONE cumulative belief v4",
"parse_success": cumulative_v4.get("parse_success_rate"),
"primary_metric": "trajectory_verdict_accuracy",
"primary_value": cumulative_v4.get("trajectory_verdict_accuracy"),
"secondary": f"p_forward_mae={fmt(cumulative_v4.get('p_forward_mae'))}",
"coverage": f"{int(cumulative_v4.get('num_parsed_steps', 0))}/52",
},
]
def render_method_table() -> str:
lines = [
"| Method | Parse success | Primary metric | Primary value | Secondary metrics | Coverage |",
"|---|---:|---|---:|---|---:|",
]
for row in method_rows():
lines.append(
f"| {row['method']} | {fmt(row['parse_success'])} | {row['primary_metric']} | "
f"{fmt(row['primary_value'])} | {row['secondary']} | {row['coverage']} |"
)
return "\n".join(lines)
def render_scenario_summary(path: Path, title: str) -> str:
rows = read_rows(path)
if not rows:
return f"## {title}\n\nNo data found at `{path.relative_to(ROOT)}`.\n"
lines = [
f"## {title}",
"",
"| Scenario | Final p_forward | Verdict | Parse / coverage |",
"|---|---:|---|---|",
]
for row in rows:
sid = row.get("scenario_id", "")
final_p = row.get("final_p", "")
verdict = row.get("verdict", "")
parsed = row.get("parsed_steps", "")
total = row.get("total_steps", "")
rate = row.get("parse_success_rate", "")
coverage = ""
if parsed or total or rate:
coverage = f"{parsed}/{total}, rate={rate}"
lines.append(f"| {sid} | {fmt(final_p)} | {verdict} | {coverage} |")
return "\n".join(lines)
def render_assets() -> str:
candidates = [
"figures/converter_direction_accuracy.png",
"figures/gold_trajectories.png",
"figures/stepwise_vs_baseline_accuracy.png",
"figures/stepwise_parse_success.png",
"figures/order_v3_accuracy_comparison.png",
"figures/order_v3_parse_success_comparison.png",
"figures/cumulative_v4_accuracy_comparison.png",
]
lines = ["## Generated Assets", ""]
for rel in candidates:
path = ROOT / rel
status = "available" if path.exists() else "missing"
lines.append(f"- `{rel}` — {status}")
return "\n".join(lines)
def main():
baseline = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "converter_eval_summary.csv")
stepwise = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "stepwise_ollama_eval_summary.csv")
cumulative = read_metric_file(RESULTS / "cumulative_v4_eval_summary.csv")
baseline_acc = baseline.get("direction_accuracy")
stepwise_acc = stepwise.get("direction_accuracy")
stepwise_parse = stepwise.get("parse_success_rate")
cumulative_parse = cumulative.get("parse_success_rate")
cumulative_acc = cumulative.get("trajectory_verdict_accuracy")
report = f"""# TBG-CoT-Bench Local Experiment Report
Generated at: `{datetime.now().isoformat(timespec="seconds")}`
## Overview
This report summarizes a local application benchmark for temporal belief tracking.
The benchmark tests whether a system can track evidence about the temporal claim:
> Event A occurred before Event B.
The current project should be interpreted as an **application-level benchmark / usage test**, not as a full internal unit test suite for the upstream `temporal-belief-graph` package.
## Compared Methods
{render_method_table()}
## Main Finding
The strongest current method is:
**EXAONE step-wise evidence v2.1**
It achieved:
- parse success rate: `{fmt(stepwise_parse)}`
- direction accuracy: `{fmt(stepwise_acc)}`
- rule-based baseline direction accuracy: `{fmt(baseline_acc)}`
This suggests that local EXAONE becomes useful when the task is decomposed into small structured evidence judgments.
## Negative Result
The cumulative v4 method was conceptually closer to belief trajectory tracking, but performed worse in this run:
- cumulative v4 parse success rate: `{fmt(cumulative_parse)}`
- cumulative v4 trajectory verdict accuracy: `{fmt(cumulative_acc)}`
This indicates that cumulative prompting can overload the local model and reduce structured-output stability.
## Interpretation
The experiment supports the following conclusion:
1. Scenario-level CoT is unstable for local EXAONE in this setup.
2. Step-wise extraction substantially improves structured-output reliability.
3. Order classification alone tends to create `UNCLEAR` collapse.
4. Cumulative belief prompting is not yet reliable with this local model/configuration.
5. The best current architecture is a modular pipeline:
- evidence extraction
- structured parsing
- trajectory update
- result visualization
{render_scenario_summary(RESULTS / "stepwise_ollama_scenario_summary.csv", "Step-wise v2.1 Scenario Summary")}
{render_scenario_summary(RESULTS / "cumulative_v4_scenario_summary.csv", "Cumulative v4 Scenario Summary")}
{render_assets()}
## Recommended Next Step
Freeze **EXAONE step-wise evidence v2.1** as the current best local method.
Next development should focus on:
- application-level regression tests
- reproducible reports
- HuggingFace notebook packaging
- optional integration tests against the actual `temporal-belief-graph` package
"""
OUT.write_text(report, encoding="utf-8")
print(f"Saved: {OUT}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()