Datasets:
File size: 6,416 Bytes
8e62344 e92b9d6 8e62344 e92b9d6 8e62344 4d13354 1ead477 e92b9d6 1ead477 e92b9d6 83799cd e92b9d6 71141e3 1ead477 e92b9d6 1ead477 e92b9d6 1ead477 e92b9d6 1ead477 e92b9d6 1ead477 68beaf6 1ead477 68beaf6 cf7de12 68beaf6 1ead477 e92b9d6 1ead477 e92b9d6 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 |
---
license: mit
task_categories:
- text-generation
tags:
- code
- benchmarks
- combinatorial-optimization
- llm-agents
---
# FrontierCO: Benchmark Dataset for Frontier Combinatorial Optimization
[Paper: CO-Bench: Benchmarking Language Model Agents in Algorithm Search for Combinatorial Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2504.04310) | [Code: CO-Bench GitHub Repository](https://github.com/sunnweiwei/CO-Bench)
## Overview
**FrontierCO** is a curated benchmark suite for evaluating ML-based solvers on large-scale and real-world **Combinatorial Optimization (CO)** problems. The benchmark spans **8 classical CO problems** across **5 application domains**, providing both training and evaluation instances specifically designed to test the frontier of ML and LLM capabilities in solving NP-hard problems.
Code for evaluating agent: [https://github.com/sunnweiwei/CO-Bench?tab=readme-ov-file#evaluation-on-frontierco](https://github.com/sunnweiwei/CO-Bench?tab=readme-ov-file#evaluation-on-frontierco)
Code for running classical solver, generating training data, evaluating neural solver: [https://github.com/sunnweiwei/FrontierCO](https://github.com/sunnweiwei/FrontierCO)
---
## Dataset Structure
Each subdirectory corresponds to a specific CO task:
```
FrontierCO/
├── CFLP/
│ ├── easy_test_instances/
│ ├── hard_test_instances/
│ ├── valid_instances/
│ └── config.py
├── CPMP/
├── CVRP/
├── FJSP/
├── MIS/
├── MDS/
├── STP/
├── TSP/
└── ...
```
Each task folder contains:
* `easy_test_instances/`: Benchmark instances that are solvable by SOTA human-designed solvers.
* `hard_test_instances/`: Instances that remain computationally intensive or lack known optimal solutions.
* `valid_instances/` *(if applicable)*: Additional instances for validation or development.
* `config.py`: Metadata about instance format, solver settings, and reference solutions.
---
## Tasks Covered
The benchmark currently includes the following problems:
* **MIS** – Maximum Independent Set
* **MDS** – Minimum Dominating Set
* **TSP** – Traveling Salesman Problem
* **CVRP** – Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem
* **CFLP** – Capacitated Facility Location Problem
* **CPMP** – Capacitated p-Median Problem
* **FJSP** – Flexible Job-shop Scheduling Problem
* **STP** – Steiner Tree Problem
Each task includes:
* Easy and hard test sets with varying difficulty and practical relevance
* Training and validation instances where applicable, generated using problem-specific generators
* Reference results for classical and ML-based solvers
---
## Data Sources
Instances are sourced from a mix of:
* Public repositories (e.g., [TSPLib](http://comopt.ifi.uni-heidelberg.de/software/TSPLib95/), [CVRPLib](http://vrp.galgos.inf.puc-rio.br/))
* DIMACS and PACE Challenges
* Synthetic instance generators used in prior ML and optimization research
* Manual curation from recent SOTA solver evaluation benchmarks
For tasks lacking open benchmarks, we include high-quality synthetic instances aligned with real-world difficulty distributions.
---
## Usage
To use this dataset, clone the repository and select the task of interest. Each `config.py` file documents the format and how to parse or evaluate the instances.
```bash
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/CO-Bench/FrontierCO
cd FrontierCO/CFLP
```
Load a data instance
```python
from config import load_data
instance = load_data('easy_test_instances/i1000_1.plc')
print(instance)
```
Generate a solution
```python
# Your solution generation code goes here.
# For example:
solution = my_solver_func(**instance)
```
### Evaluate a solution
```python
from config import eval_func
score = eval_func(**instance, **solution)
print("Evaluation score:", score)
```
<details>
<summary><strong>Using Agents on Custom Problems</strong></summary>
Step 1: Include a concise description and a solve template. For example:
```python
problem_description = '''The Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) is a classic combinatorial optimization problem where, given a set of cities with known pairwise distances, the objective is to find the shortest possible tour that visits each city exactly once and returns to the starting city. More formally, given a complete graph G = (V, E) with vertices V representing cities and edges E with weights representing distances, we seek to find a Hamiltonian cycle (a closed path visiting each vertex exactly once) of minimum total weight.
Implement in Solve Function
def solve(**kwargs):
"""
Solve a TSP instance.
Args:
- nodes (list): List of (x, y) coordinates representing cities in the TSP problem
Format: [(x1, y1), (x2, y2), ..., (xn, yn)]
Returns:
dict: Solution information with:
- 'tour' (list): List of node indices representing the solution path
Format: [0, 3, 1, ...] where numbers are indices into the nodes list
"""
return {
'tour': [],
}
'''
```
Step 2: Define the agent
```python
from agents import GreedyRefine
agent = GreedyRefine(
problem_description=problem_description,
timeout=10,
model='openai/o3-mini')
```
Step 3: Define the `evaluate` function and run the loop. Use the evaluate function to get results on the data, and iteratively improve the solution based on feedback:
```python
evaluate = ... # Define evaluate() to return score (float) and feedback (str)
# Run for 64 iterations
for it in range(64):
code = agent.step()
dev_score, dev_feedback = evaluate(code) # Define evaluate() to return score (float) and feedback (str)
agent.feedback(dev_score, dev_feedback)
# Get the final soltuion
code = agent.finalize()
print(code)
```
</details>
*Docker environment for sandboxed agent execution and solution evaluation: coming soon.*
---
## Citation
If you use **FrontierCO** in your research or applications, please cite the following paper:
```bibtex
@misc{feng2025comprehensive,
title={A Comprehensive Evaluation of Contemporary ML-Based Solvers for Combinatorial Optimization},
author={Shengyu Feng and Weiwei Sun and Shanda Li and Ameet Talwalkar and Yiming Yang},
year={2025},
}
```
---
## License
This dataset is released under the MIT License. Refer to `LICENSE` file for details.
--- |