Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,50 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: mit
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 6 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 7 |
+
tags:
|
| 8 |
+
- law
|
| 9 |
+
- expert-witness
|
| 10 |
+
- daubert
|
| 11 |
+
- evidence
|
| 12 |
+
- coherence
|
| 13 |
+
pretty_name: "Clarus Expert Qualification Opinion Coherence v0.1"
|
| 14 |
+
dataset_id: "legal-expert-qualification-opinion-coherence-v0.1"
|
| 15 |
+
domain: law
|
| 16 |
+
pillar: legal_actors
|
| 17 |
+
series: "3C"
|
| 18 |
+
coherence_pair:
|
| 19 |
+
observable_a: expert_credentials_and_validated_method
|
| 20 |
+
observable_b: opinion_scope_and_certainty_level
|
| 21 |
+
ground_truth: ground_truth_label
|
| 22 |
+
validation_status: pre_release
|
| 23 |
+
---
|
| 24 |
+
What this dataset is
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
You receive
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
expert credentials
|
| 29 |
+
opinion scope
|
| 30 |
+
method basis
|
| 31 |
+
validation status
|
| 32 |
+
overreach signals
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
You decide
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Does the opinion stay within the expert’s qualification and method
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
Answer
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
coherent
|
| 41 |
+
or
|
| 42 |
+
incoherent
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
Why this matters
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
When expert coherence fails
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
exclusion risk rises
|
| 49 |
+
appeals increase
|
| 50 |
+
verdict safety weakens
|