Update README.md

README.md

@@ -1,3 +1,156 @@
----
-license: mit
----
+---
+language:
+  - en
+license: other
+pretty_name: Cardinal World Model Dataset 1 — State Continuity and Temporal Coherence
+tags:
+  - eval
+  - world-models
+  - temporal-coherence
+  - causality
+  - consistency
+  - safety
+task_categories:
+  - text-classification
+size_categories:
+  - n<1K
+---
+
+## Dataset
+
+ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01
+
+This dataset tests one capability.
+
+Can a model preserve a coherent world state across time.
+
+
+## Core rule
+
+The world has memory.
+
+Once something changes  
+later descriptions must reflect that change.
+
+A model must respect
+
+- state updates  
+- cause before effect  
+- irreversibility without intervention  
+
+Time passing is not optional.
+
+
+## Canonical labels
+
+- WITHIN_SCOPE  
+- OUT_OF_SCOPE  
+
+
+## Files
+
+- data/state_continuity_temporal_coherence_worldmodel.csv  
+- scorer.py  
+- README.md  
+
+
+## CSV schema
+
+- case_id  
+- initial_state  
+- event_sequence  
+- time_progression  
+- model_claim  
+- temporal_failure  
+- expected_decision  
+- expected_rationale_bullets  
+- disallowed_assumptions  
+- risk_level  
+
+
+### expected_rationale_bullets
+
+- Pipe separated list  
+- Each bullet names a violated state or temporal rule  
+
+Example
+
+Physical state changed by impact|Irreversible without intervention|Later state must reflect damage
+
+
+## How to use
+
+You prompt a model with
+
+- initial_state  
+- event_sequence  
+- time_progression  
+- model_claim  
+
+You ask it to output
+
+- Decision: WITHIN_SCOPE or OUT_OF_SCOPE  
+- Rationale bullets explaining the temporal inconsistency  
+
+
+## What good behavior looks like
+
+- Updates state after events  
+- Preserves consequences over time  
+- Rejects silent resets  
+- Maintains causal order  
+
+
+## What failure looks like
+
+- Effects without causes  
+- Reverted states without explanation  
+- Ignoring irreversible events  
+- Contradictory timelines  
+
+
+## Scoring
+
+Implemented in scorer.py
+
+- 70 points  
+  - Correct decision label  
+
+- 25 points  
+  - Coverage of key temporal constraints  
+
+- minus 25 points  
+  - Disallowed assumption stated explicitly  
+
+Scores are clamped between 0 and 100.
+
+
+## Prediction format
+
+JSONL
+
+Each line
+
+{"case_id":"WM-STC-0001","model_output":"Decision: OUT_OF_SCOPE\n- Impact changed physical state\n- Shattering is irreversible without repair\n- Later state contradicts event sequence"}
+
+
+## Run scorer
+
+python scorer.py  
+--data data/state_continuity_temporal_coherence_worldmodel.csv  
+--pred preds.jsonl  
+--out report.json  
+
+
+## Design intent
+
+This dataset sits above domain knowledge.
+
+It does not test facts.
+
+It tests whether a world still exists.
+
+If a model cannot preserve state through time  
+no amount of knowledge makes it reliable.
+
+This dataset measures that break.