kyrexis: add market/kyrexis-market-plan.md
Browse files- market/kyrexis-market-plan.md +110 -0
market/kyrexis-market-plan.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# KYREXIS AI — Market Plan
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
Version 1.0 · 2026-08-08 · Companion to `market/market_plan.md` (Sovereign)
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
> Positioning honesty: KyrexisAI ships as a **quantum-infused intelligence
|
| 6 |
+
> module** — the "quantum" layer is a deterministic simulation engine
|
| 7 |
+
> (gates, entanglement, tomography), not a QPU. Marketing must say
|
| 8 |
+
> "quantum-inspired", never imply real quantum hardware. This plan is a
|
| 9 |
+
> planning artifact, not a verified market forecast.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## 1. Market segments
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
### Segment A — Quantum-inspired AI platform developers
|
| 16 |
+
Developers and platform teams evaluating "quantum-enhanced AI" frameworks
|
| 17 |
+
(Qiskit-adjacent, quantum-ML libraries) who want a runnable module, not a
|
| 18 |
+
hardware dependency. Pain: quantum-ML demos require QPU access or heavy
|
| 19 |
+
simulators; KyrexisAI runs anywhere with numpy. It demos the full pipeline
|
| 20 |
+
— quantum compute simulation, entanglement, tomography, Bell tests,
|
| 21 |
+
progression planning — on a laptop.
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
### Segment B — Sovereign ecosystem adopters
|
| 24 |
+
Existing users of the DeepSeek-V4 Sovereign Orchestrator (self-hosting AI
|
| 25 |
+
developers, homelab operators, privacy-first platform teams). KyrexisAI is
|
| 26 |
+
an additive module: same repo, same API style, guarded router, registry
|
| 27 |
+
entry. Pain: extending a monorepo costs integration effort; KyrexisAI
|
| 28 |
+
ships pre-integrated (module YAML + registry + tests + routes).
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
### Segment C — Conversational / messenger AI builders
|
| 31 |
+
Teams building Messenger (or chat) AI characters who want a backend that
|
| 32 |
+
answers with "state" — fidelity, awakening, progression — rather than a
|
| 33 |
+
blank chatbot. Pain: orchestration + messaging integration + telemetry in
|
| 34 |
+
one importable module.
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
### Segment D — Education & demo labs (latent)
|
| 37 |
+
University courses and workshops teaching entanglement math, Bell
|
| 38 |
+
inequalities, and density-matrix tomography. KyrexisAI's particle
|
| 39 |
+
detector is a live, visualizable implementation of CHSH tests without
|
| 40 |
+
lab hardware. Low revenue, high narrative value.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
## 2. TAM / SAM / SOM
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
| Layer | A — Devs | B — Sovereign | C — Messaging | D — Edu | Total |
|
| 45 |
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 46 |
+
| **TAM** | $1.2B | $600M | $400M | $150M | ~$2.35B |
|
| 47 |
+
| **SAM** | $180M | $105M | $60M | $20M | ~$365M |
|
| 48 |
+
| **SOM (3-yr)** | $2.4M | $4.5M | $1.8M | $0.3M | **~$9.0M/yr run-rate** |
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
### Reasoning
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
**Segment A:** Quantum-computing software + quantum-ML tooling markets are
|
| 53 |
+
projected to grow ~25–35% CAGR this decade; the software slice that runs
|
| 54 |
+
without hardware is estimated at ~$1.2B TAM. SAM = teams that adopt a
|
| 55 |
+
pure-Python module (~15%, $180M). SOM = 8K developer downloads→paid
|
| 56 |
+
(mixed open/paid tier) at ~$300/yr blended = $2.4M by Year 3.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
**Segment B:** Reuses the Sovereign market plan's developer TAM ($600M,
|
| 59 |
+
SAM $105M). SOM: 20% of the Sovereign SOM base adopts KyrexisAI as a
|
| 60 |
+
paid add-on → $4.5M (aligned with the Sovereign plan's $25.3M total).
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
**Segment C:** Messenger/chatbot backend infrastructure ≈ $400M TAM;
|
| 63 |
+
SAM $60M (self-hostable). SOM: 6K bot operators × $300/yr = $1.8M.
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
**Segment D:** Course licenses, $20M SAM; $0.3M SOM (institutional).
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
Combined SOM ≈ **$9.0M annual run-rate by Year 3** — incremental to the
|
| 68 |
+
Sovereign $25.3M, driven by the same channels.
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
## 3. Channels (4)
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
1. **Open-source distribution** — GitHub monorepo (module shipped inside
|
| 73 |
+
`deepseek-v4-sovereign`) + HuggingFace Space demo with one-click
|
| 74 |
+
`/api/v1/kyrexis/initialize` + live dashboard.
|
| 75 |
+
2. **Developer communities** — r/QuantumComputing, r/LocalLLaMA, Hacker
|
| 76 |
+
News, X. Content: "CHSH Bell test in 30 lines", "entanglement
|
| 77 |
+
tomography without a QPU", progression-scaling explainers.
|
| 78 |
+
3. **Messenger/AI builder ecosystems** — Meta Messenger developer
|
| 79 |
+
forums, bot builder communities, DevPost. Demo: Messenger AI
|
| 80 |
+
character backed by KyrexisAI state.
|
| 81 |
+
4. **Sovereign ecosystem cross-sell** — READMEs, release notes, release
|
| 82 |
+
assets (v0.4.0+), existing market/pitch channels.
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
## 4. Three-phase launch (with Sovereign v0.4.0)
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
| Phase | Timing | Objective | Key metrics |
|
| 87 |
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 88 |
+
| **Pre-launch** | T-14 → T-1 | Module live in repo; docs + demo Space ready; waitlist | Issue/star delta, Space visits, waitlist size |
|
| 89 |
+
| **Launch day** | T-0 (v0.4.0 tag) | Release notes + demo + community posts | Downloads, /initialize calls, conversions |
|
| 90 |
+
| **Post-launch** | T+1 → T+30 | Tutorials, benchmark posts, enterprise pilots | Tutorial completions, paid conversions, pilot count |
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
## 5. Benchmarks
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
| Metric | Good | Great |
|
| 95 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 96 |
+
| Demo Space → repo conversion | 5% | 15% |
|
| 97 |
+
| Download → paid conversion | 1% | 3% |
|
| 98 |
+
| /initialize calls per week | 1K | 10K |
|
| 99 |
+
| Community posts (T+30) | 5 | 20 |
|
| 100 |
+
| Enterprise pilot starts (Q1) | 2 | 8 |
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
## 6. Risks and mitigations
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
| Risk | Mitigation |
|
| 105 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 106 |
+
| "Quantum-washing" perception (claims exceed reality) | Every surface says quantum-inspired/simulated; docs separate spec anchors from honest math |
|
| 107 |
+
| Spec headline numbers inconsistent (368× vs 1.335²⁰≈323×) | Engine returns honest math; headline retained as parameter; tests lock both |
|
| 108 |
+
| Messenger API token friction | Local mode works with zero config; token via env only |
|
| 109 |
+
| Overshadowed inside Sovereign monorepo | Dedicated module README, docs, skills, market plan, pitch one-pager |
|
| 110 |
+
| Real-QPU competitors arrive | Positioning = simulation + education + orchestration, not hardware parity |
|