Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
tags:
|
| 4 |
+
- llm
|
| 5 |
+
- benchmarks
|
| 6 |
+
- ai-evaluation
|
| 7 |
+
- model-comparison
|
| 8 |
+
- features
|
| 9 |
+
- rate-limits
|
| 10 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 11 |
+
- n<1K
|
| 12 |
+
---
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
# LLM Benchmark & Feature Matrix 2026
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
**Which LLM is best at what?** This dataset maps capabilities, performance, and limits of 22 major models.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
Unlike pricing datasets, this focuses on **what models can do** — not just what they cost.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
## Files
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
| File | Description |
|
| 23 |
+
|------|-------------|
|
| 24 |
+
| `llm-benchmarks-2026.csv` | MMLU, HumanEval, MATH, Arena ELO, coding/reasoning/multilingual rankings, tier (S+ to B) |
|
| 25 |
+
| `llm-features-2026.csv` | 15 binary capabilities: vision, function calling, JSON mode, fine-tuning, tool use, web search, embeddings... |
|
| 26 |
+
| `llm-rate-limits-2026.csv` | Free tier availability, RPM/TPM limits, batch discounts, cached input discounts |
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
## Models Covered
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
22 models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, Mistral, DeepSeek, xAI, Cohere
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## Use Cases
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
- **Model selection** — Find models that support your required features (e.g., vision + function calling + fine-tuning)
|
| 35 |
+
- **Performance comparison** — Which model scores highest on coding vs reasoning vs multilingual?
|
| 36 |
+
- **Rate limit planning** — Can you stay within free tier? What are the paid RPM limits?
|
| 37 |
+
- **Tier analysis** — S+ tier models vs A tier — is the premium worth it?
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Key Insights
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- Only **Google Gemini** supports all 15 features (vision, search, embeddings, fine-tuning, code execution)
|
| 42 |
+
- **DeepSeek** offers 90% cached input discount — massive savings for repetitive workloads
|
| 43 |
+
- **Groq** has highest free tier RPM (30) with lowest latency
|
| 44 |
+
- S+ tier models (o1, Claude Opus 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek R1) all score >89 MMLU
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
## Related
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
- [LLM Rankings](https://comparedge.com/best/llm) — Live leaderboard
|
| 49 |
+
- [AI Tools Pricing Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ComparEdge/ai-tools-pricing-2026) — 104 AI tools
|
| 50 |
+
- [Kaggle: Full Pricing Data](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/comparedge/llm-api-pricing-comparison-2026)
|
| 51 |
+
- [GitHub Open Data](https://github.com/comparedge/awesome-saas-comparison-data)
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
## License
|
| 54 |
+
CC BY 4.0 — [ComparEdge](https://comparedge.com)
|