--- license: apache-2.0 tags: - crovia - trust - provenance - auditability - dsse - evidence pretty_name: "DSSE 1M — Verifiable Trust Drift Proof" --- # DSSE 1M — Verifiable Trust Drift Proof This repository is the **primary public evidence** of the Crovia project. It demonstrates that a **measurable trust drift signal** can be observed: - between two temporal states of a dataset - with **no declared dataset change** - using a reproducible, auditable pipeline - on commodity hardware - at the scale of **1 million records** No interpretation is provided. No attribution is claimed. This repository contains **evidence only**. --- ## What this is This dataset is a **cryptographically anchored evidence package** produced by Crovia. It shows that: - trust-related structural properties of a dataset - can drift over time - even when no official change is declared - and that such drift can be **measured, reproduced, and verified** The output is a signal — not a conclusion. --- ## What this is NOT - ❌ Not a benchmark - ❌ Not a model evaluation - ❌ Not a claim against any dataset or organization - ❌ Not a legal or ethical judgment Crovia does **not** interpret the signal. Crovia only makes it verifiable. --- ## Contents (root) - `START_HERE.md` → minimal orientation for verification - `EVIDENCE.ndjson` → full machine-readable evidence trace - `HASHES.txt` → cryptographic anchors - `SNAPSHOT_LATEST.json` → latest observed state (with evidence attached) - `synth_1M_drift.ndjson` → aggregated drift signal (1M scale) --- ## Reproducibility All artifacts in this repository are: - deterministic - hash-linked - reproducible from inputs - inspectable without proprietary tooling If the signal is wrong, it can be disproven. That is the point. --- ## Position in the Crovia ecosystem This repository is the **reference proof**. Other Crovia datasets (LAION examples, CEP capsules, conceptual datasets) exist to illustrate, explore, or contextualize the system — **not** to replace this evidence. --- ## One rule > If a system affects trust, > there must be evidence. > And that evidence must be auditable.