Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

README.md

@@ -54,11 +54,11 @@ We organize the reviews corresponding to 19,926 papers into a dictionary keyed b
 #### Review Data Format
 
 The format of the review data is below. 
-    - `paper_id` refers to the unique identifier of the paper on OpenReview
-    - `initial_score` is the score before the rebuttal
-    - `final_score` is the final score after the rebuttal
-    - Fields ending with `_unified` represent the scores after unification
-    - `review_initial_ratings_unified` and `review_final_ratings_unified` are the lists of all review scores before and after the rebuttal, respectively
+- `paper_id` refers to the unique identifier of the paper on OpenReview
+- `initial_score` is the score before the rebuttal
+- `final_score` is the final score after the rebuttal
+- Fields ending with `_unified` represent the scores after unification
+- `review_initial_ratings_unified` and `review_final_ratings_unified` are the lists of all review scores before and after the rebuttal, respectively
 
 
 ```json
@@ -162,13 +162,13 @@ As for the rebuttal, we model the rebuttal and discussion data as a multi-turn c
 #### Rebuttal Data Format
 
 The format of the review data is below.
-    - `paper_id` refers to the unique identifier of the paper on OpenReview
-    - `messages` is formatted as a multi-turn conversation
-    - `final_score` is the final score after the rebuttal
-    - When the `role` is set to system, it defines the overall context for the entire rebuttal multi-turn dialogue
-    - The first message with the `role` of user serves to trigger the review process, providing the model with the paper information and confirming its identity as a reviewer
-    - Subsequent messages with the `role` of user serve as the author's responses
-    - Messages with the `role` of assistant serve as the reviewer's comments or replies during the discussion
+- `paper_id` refers to the unique identifier of the paper on OpenReview
+- `messages` is formatted as a multi-turn conversation
+- `final_score` is the final score after the rebuttal
+- When the `role` is set to system, it defines the overall context for the entire rebuttal multi-turn dialogue
+- The first message with the `role` of user serves to trigger the review process, providing the model with the paper information and confirming its identity as a reviewer
+- Subsequent messages with the `role` of user serve as the author's responses
+- Messages with the `role` of assistant serve as the reviewer's comments or replies during the discussion
 
 ```json
 [