Devendra174's picture
Upload folder using huggingface_hub
1e92f2d verified
import { RouteKind } from '../route-kind'
import type { RouteMatch } from '../route-matches/route-match'
import type { RouteDefinition } from '../route-definitions/route-definition'
import { DefaultRouteMatcherManager } from './default-route-matcher-manager'
import type { MatchOptions, RouteMatcherManager } from './route-matcher-manager'
import path from '../../shared/lib/isomorphic/path'
import * as Log from '../../build/output/log'
import { cyan } from '../../lib/picocolors'
import type { RouteMatcher } from '../route-matchers/route-matcher'
export interface RouteEnsurer {
ensure(match: RouteMatch, pathname: string): Promise<void>
}
export class DevRouteMatcherManager extends DefaultRouteMatcherManager {
constructor(
private readonly production: RouteMatcherManager,
private readonly ensurer: RouteEnsurer,
private readonly dir: string
) {
super()
}
public async test(pathname: string, options: MatchOptions): Promise<boolean> {
// Try to find a match within the developer routes.
const match = await super.match(pathname, options)
// Return if the match wasn't null. Unlike the implementation of `match`
// which uses `matchAll` here, this does not call `ensure` on the match
// found via the development matches.
return match !== null
}
protected validate(
pathname: string,
matcher: RouteMatcher,
options: MatchOptions
): RouteMatch | null {
const match = super.validate(pathname, matcher, options)
// If a match was found, check to see if there were any conflicting app or
// pages files.
// TODO: maybe expand this to _any_ duplicated routes instead?
if (
match &&
matcher.duplicated &&
matcher.duplicated.some(
(duplicate) =>
duplicate.definition.kind === RouteKind.APP_PAGE ||
duplicate.definition.kind === RouteKind.APP_ROUTE
) &&
matcher.duplicated.some(
(duplicate) =>
duplicate.definition.kind === RouteKind.PAGES ||
duplicate.definition.kind === RouteKind.PAGES_API
)
) {
return null
}
return match
}
public async *matchAll(
pathname: string,
options: MatchOptions
): AsyncGenerator<RouteMatch<RouteDefinition<RouteKind>>, null, undefined> {
// Compile the development routes.
// TODO: we may want to only run this during testing, users won't be fast enough to require this many dir scans
await super.reload()
// Iterate over the development matches to see if one of them match the
// request path.
for await (const developmentMatch of super.matchAll(pathname, options)) {
// We're here, which means that we haven't seen this match yet, so we
// should try to ensure it and recompile the production matcher.
await this.ensurer.ensure(developmentMatch, pathname)
await this.production.reload()
// Iterate over the production matches again, this time we should be able
// to match it against the production matcher unless there's an error.
for await (const productionMatch of this.production.matchAll(
pathname,
options
)) {
yield productionMatch
}
}
// We tried direct matching against the pathname and against all the dynamic
// paths, so there was no match.
return null
}
public async reload(): Promise<void> {
// Compile the production routes again.
await this.production.reload()
// Compile the development routes.
await super.reload()
// Check for and warn of any duplicates.
for (const [pathname, matchers] of Object.entries(
this.matchers.duplicates
)) {
// We only want to warn about matchers resolving to the same path if their
// identities are different.
const identity = matchers[0].identity
if (matchers.slice(1).some((matcher) => matcher.identity !== identity)) {
continue
}
Log.warn(
`Duplicate page detected. ${matchers
.map((matcher) =>
cyan(path.relative(this.dir, matcher.definition.filename))
)
.join(' and ')} resolve to ${cyan(pathname)}`
)
}
}
}