| ==Phrack Inc.== | |
| Volume Two, Issue 20, File 7 of 12 | |
| Metal Shop Private's -- Phreak/Hack Sub | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
| This subboard contained all technical questions and conversations about | |
| phreaking and hacking. If something was illegal on it (occasionally some idiot | |
| would post codes and then soon after be deleted), it was removed as soon as I | |
| saw it. | |
| 1/70: Red Box...... | |
| Name: The Disk Jockey 13 | |
| Date: 4:24 am Sun Apr 26, 1987 | |
| Back at the private school I went to, everyone lived pretty much out of state, | |
| and would always be calling their girlfriends back at home, thus making a | |
| pretty big investment into the local payphones. After reading the files on | |
| how a red box worked, took my little dictation recorder and went to a payphone | |
| and found that I could record the tones that were made when you dropped | |
| quarters in. I recorded about $4 worth of quarters, and it worked great. | |
| Every time the computerized voice would say "Please deposit $1.70 for the past | |
| 5 minutes" you could just play the tape via a pair of sony walkman headphones | |
| into the mouthpiece, and the phone would think that you deposited money in it. | |
| It was pretty neat back then (several years ago.....) but every now and then | |
| you would get the regular operator on instead of that synthasized voice. | |
| -The Disk Jockey | |
| Yes, not really important, but I saw "red box" in that last message and it | |
| reminded me of that. Those were the days when there were lots of extenders | |
| with 3 and 4 digit codes, and PBX's with NO codes..... | |
| 2/70: Since | |
| Name: The Leftist 71 | |
| Date: 5:26 am Mon Apr 27, 1987 | |
| Since non-sup seems to be popular these days | |
| 404-289-0000-0009 test recordings, non-supd.. I beleive 0004 is deposit coin.. | |
| anyway, these are fun to forward to when you dont want people to be able to | |
| reach you.. | |
| Ltist | |
| 3/70: Teleco numbers | |
| Name: Mad Hatter 51 | |
| Date: 5:36 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987 | |
| Would most(all) of the Teleco numbers(i.e. 99xx series) be non-suped? That | |
| would seem at semi-logical atleast, eh? | |
| -Hatter | |
| 4/70: Tuning Fork | |
| Name: Knight Lightning 2 | |
| Date: 7:34 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987 | |
| How succesful would you be if you tried to use a tuning fork to simulate 2600 | |
| Hertz? And if so, what would be good to use for MF? Fun, no? Heh! | |
| Also, what does anyone know about the 508 NPA. | |
| :Knight Lightning | |
| 5/70: Supvision Xlation | |
| Name: Doom Prophet 21 | |
| Date: 10:13 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987 | |
| The best way to box is to pull a cat's tail after making a call, then get a | |
| rubber band and twang it in your teeth like Snoopy for MF. | |
| Since we were talking about supervision a little bit, I went through some | |
| stuff I had on translations. What I think makes a number unsupervised (besies | |
| the fact that there is no return of supervision, or reverse battery | |
| signalling) is the charging translation in the terminating office. The | |
| screening code of a chart class (charges and route are determined by the chart | |
| class I believe) that denotes the call charge type would register to not make | |
| either a detailed or bulk AMA entry at the toll office (if the number is 1+ | |
| for someone), since it as if the number never answered. A 'detailed' AMA entry | |
| shows the calling and called numbers, whereas a bulk AMA entry shows only the | |
| calling number. | |
| Something else about translations, it doesn't mean an 800 to POTS or special | |
| BTN when people talk about ESS translations, but the information on particular | |
| Directory Numbers that finds and identifies the line equipment of the called | |
| number (calling also I believe) that would provide any special info that is | |
| needed by the switch to process the call, for example, whether a call is | |
| coming from one or two party lines, or whether it is a four party line with | |
| full selective ringing (which can't be tested by MLT equipment which is why I | |
| remember it). If no translation influenced the way the call is processed, then | |
| how would the switch know to route tthe calling party to an operator for ONI | |
| if the calling line was more than two party (with the specifications talkd | |
| about earlier about the R and T leads status determining the billing also | |
| taken into consideration). | |
| Anyway, this post is basically correct but if anyone finds any errors then | |
| please correct me. | |
| Doom | |
| 6/70: Things | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 10:41 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987 | |
| Well, RC's on an ESS are called translations too, at least when done by an | |
| RC-MAC clerk. RC data involving a line that is changed can be called | |
| translations. Don't ask me why this is so, but it's what I've heard. | |
| Does anyone here know what an ANIF-7 is? As far as I can tell, it is an ANI | |
| failure to TSPS, but that's all I know about it...it can probably happen | |
| anytime, but I do know that it was a specific problem with an early 5ESS | |
| generic. | |
| Oh yeah, another unsuped signusoid is at (618)235+0090..this was found by | |
| Syntax Error a long time ago. A neat thing about these 'tone sweeps' is that | |
| if you call through an OCC that uses an OUTWATS line that is set up on an | |
| inband signalling trunk, the OUTWATS linne will be trunked from the other end. | |
| This happens as the tone gets near 2600Hz, but it is more sensitive on an OCC | |
| switch, as something like 2710 and 2500 will also reset or trunk their | |
| equipment, or at least that's what I've found. | |
| Phantom | |
| 7/70: FALFALAFL | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 11:01 pm Mon Apr 27, 1987 | |
| I'd like to congradulate Doom Prophet on his extremely witty response to KL's | |
| absolutely out-of-place post. REFRAIN | |
| Question...Most test numbers are unsuped, but I have at least one tone sweep | |
| that I can think of off-hand that is suped. What would be the purpose either | |
| way? Later | |
| -TK | |
| 8/70: repair number | |
| Name: The Scanner 20 | |
| Date: 2:34 pm Tue Apr 28, 1987 | |
| Would the repair number used for a payphone be the same as a residence repair | |
| number? Also, Doesnt the place that houses the phone (say a gas station) don't | |
| they get a cut of the profits from the phone? If they do, | |
| wouldnt they have the repair number? | |
| _-The Scanner | |
| 9/70: 2 Q's | |
| Name: Circuit Breaker 5 | |
| Date: 12:11 pm Wed Apr 29, 1987 | |
| Why are there PBXs that give a loud tone before the code. And does anyone | |
| know what the difference is between the ANI-D jack and regular ANI is? | |
| 10/70: Red-boxing | |
| Name: Icarus 15 | |
| Date: 11:32 am Thu Apr 30, 1987 | |
| I saw before that someone mentioned that the amount of money entered into a | |
| payphone of some kind is not kept track of. If this is true then it would | |
| seem impossible for MA DUMBELL to ever catch on to red-boxing. That is if | |
| AT&T phones don't have a money counter in them. TK-When the money was | |
| collected from the payphone, did you notice whether he had the amount of money | |
| that was "supposed" to be in there? Or whether he even checked it? | |
| If the money is counted then it is possible that the person who collects the | |
| coins would get in trouble for not reporting all the money that was | |
| registered. The money not being there because of redboxing. | |
| It is also possible to red box off of blue AT&T payphones (without a money | |
| slot). I am curious whether that can EVER be found out, since there is no | |
| money counter (obviously) to check. | |
| Icarus | |
| 11/70: Well... | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 2:41 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987 | |
| Next time I see the guy there, I'll ask him, but I did see him write a few | |
| things down. None that I could decipher meant anything related to money so | |
| I'm not sure if there was a counter in it. I'll have to check it out though | |
| -TK | |
| 12/70: Payfone Mutin | |
| Name: Jester Sluggo 31 | |
| Date: 6:49 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987 | |
| That was supposed to be "Payfone Muting". | |
| In anycase, on most new payfones, they have what is called "Muting" | |
| which "mutes"-out any red box tones from entering through the Mouthpiece. | |
| Those new non-coin-slot payfones should have those, but I've never tried. | |
| / | |
| \ | |
| / luggo !! | |
| 13/70: DNR/Pen Registers | |
| Name: Knight Lightning 2 | |
| Date: 7:04 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987 | |
| Are there any noticable effects from having one of these on your line? Static, | |
| a low hum in the background, or line noise where there shouldn't be? | |
| :Knight Lightning | |
| 14/70: well... | |
| Name: Lucifer 666 43 | |
| Date: 7:40 pm Thu Apr 30, 1987 | |
| about the tuning fork...it does work.. i've used a harmonica.. | |
| also, how exactly do the bandwiths switch in multiplexing... | |
| L666 | |
| 15/70: From what I've heard | |
| Name: The Scanner 20 | |
| Date: 8:30 am Fri May 01, 1987 | |
| That there isnt any way to detect a Pen register. No humm, buzz, or any thing | |
| else. But hey, what do I know? | |
| Dont answer that. | |
| Anyway, 2 more questions, | |
| Im sure momma bell knows all about red box tones and stuff like that. But, | |
| what about those independent co's that make pay telephones and just kinda hook | |
| them up to normal lines in stores and stuff. Wouldnt they be easy to box off | |
| of or do they work in a different way altogether? Well, that was only one but | |
| an answer is appreciated. | |
| _-The Scanner | |
| 16/70: 'Round here... | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 2:41 pm Fri May 01, 1987 | |
| In this region, you can't just play the tones into the mouthpiece and get cred | |
| (credit) for whatever you've played into the phone...you CAN, though, dial a | |
| long distance number, it will then say, "Please deposit $x.xx". You put in | |
| (play the tones for) the money and it says something like, "Thank you for | |
| using AT&T." Ta da | |
| -TK | |
| 17/70: Muxing, Etc | |
| Name: Doom Prophet 21 | |
| Date: 4:56 pm Fri May 01, 1987 | |
| Lucifer, I think what you mean about the bandwidths changing in Multiplexing, | |
| you are referring to voice frequency bandwidths. Multiplexing is just a method | |
| of sending more than one converstation down the same transmission path. In | |
| analog and older switches the method is called Frequency Division | |
| Multiplexing, or FDM, when the signals are seperated on basis of frequency, as | |
| opposed to newer switches which do it on a Time division basis (TDM). There's | |
| also something called Space DM but I don't think it has a whole lot to do with | |
| telephones (maybe stuff like digital Xmission). But anyway, a normal VF voice | |
| bandwidth goes from 300 to 3000 Hz which is SF in band, although the VF | |
| channel goes from 0 to 4000 Hz. Anything above 3000 is out of band signalling | |
| (like 3700 Hz). CCIS uses a seperate nettwork composed of STP's and varioius | |
| links and channels for independent signalling methods. | |
| About the red boxing, the circuits that keep track of the coins that have been | |
| entered are called Coin Detection & Announcement circuits (if the fortress is | |
| in an ACTS serving area), which are a part of the Station Signalling | |
| Announcement Subsystem which work out of local offices and in conjunction with | |
| TSPS (not TOPS as far as I have seenn, a flash of the switchook anytime | |
| during the initial charge announcements and an operator is connected. Playing | |
| the tones to a live operator wouldn't be a good idea as they can obviously | |
| tell the difference. | |
| Something else, there was a little discussion about AMA and all (isn't there | |
| everywhere?) a while back. The way a local office (LAMA) would keep track of | |
| the billing data is to use a few AMA circuits (there are always two, AMA0 and | |
| AMA1 but can be more for big offices) that reverse positions (from an active | |
| to standby mode at midnight when the datta in the buffer is recorded onto the | |
| actual tapes). So the AMARC computers can format the data to where it is | |
| recognnized by the RAO, the tapes have to be specially customized for that | |
| particular officere. A header label on the tape (put on at the beginning of | |
| each new tape entry (12)) tells the originating NPA, the office number, date | |
| and tape transport dates. A tape trailer is added on at the end of the tape | |
| entry for that day, which has the info about how many total calls were AMA | |
| recorded. The tape mark is some digit (?) that tells the RAO that the useful | |
| info (that they need to look at) is ended. The billing data itself is in a | |
| binary coded decimal form (0's and 1's) along with check and dummy codes. A | |
| noncheck dummy code fills the spaces on the tape to signigy that there wasn't | |
| a problem, but the space is supposed tobe there. A check dummy code is because | |
| the info wasn't received or sent from the Peripheral Adress bus or from the | |
| originating register into the charge buffer. If you ever come across AMA | |
| records (like in the call store section of SCCS) it won't look like anything | |
| that can determine billing (AMARC and RAO do that). They aren't too hard to | |
| read though, just takes a while. | |
| Doom | |
| Read:(1-70,^17),T,R,Q,P,A,? : | |
| 18/70: Correction | |
| Name: Doom Prophet 21 | |
| Date: 5:52 pm Fri May 01, 1987 | |
| Damn, what I got that I thought was some type of AMA records are not AMA | |
| records (I think), so that means that I haven't been reading AMA records. | |
| Shit, that's something that I want to do. Have to get some. | |
| Doom | |
| 19/70: well... | |
| Name: Sir Francis Drake 56 | |
| Date: 8:15 pm Fri May 01, 1987 | |
| You mentioned the third time of multiplexing as Stad DM or something, I | |
| believe what you mean is Stattistcal Time Division (STDM). A STDM is just | |
| a normal TDM improved so that empty bandwiths (which occur on TDM) are used | |
| by busy ones. This allows a hell of alot more efficient use of the line then | |
| TDM's. STDM is mainly used when you have alot of terminals/whatever that | |
| wont always be being used. | |
| Hmm, I have some good stuff on pay phone accounting somewhere.... | |
| sfd | |
| 20/70: Payf0nez | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 10:57 pm Sat May 02, 1987 | |
| There are some types of payphones that are attached to a normal cable pair, | |
| a normal line, and in this case the payphone like usage would be determined in | |
| the phone and not in an office. I can't remember the exact type, or even where | |
| I read it but if I should find it by any chance then I'll put it p. | |
| Phantom | |
| 21/70: P-Phones | |
| Name: Jester Sluggo 31 | |
| Date: 12:19 pm Sun May 03, 1987 | |
| Well, there are several manufacturers of payfones that make several different | |
| type of payfones. If someone could call up the factory, or a salesman, or | |
| dealer of these products, and pose as a perspective buyer, then that'd solve | |
| these questions.. (shit..) | |
| It perhaps might make a good file for Phrack. But I don't have the time do | |
| to do those things.) | |
| / | |
| \ | |
| / luggo !! | |
| 22/70: AMA | |
| Name: Circuit Breaker 5 | |
| Date: 10:43 pm Sun May 03, 1987 | |
| There is some AMA info on LMOS. The audit file is under /dev/smlog /smlog. | |
| I got a list for two different streams ST1 and ST2. You should see, | |
| office id | |
| days until expiration | |
| process start time | |
| stop time | |
| the ama default | |
| ama teleprocessing | |
| its also will have some stuff such as HOC password and a backup HOC password, | |
| Also look under /dev/unixabf /unixa/users, this will give you the termination | |
| codes after the stream code like: | |
| S# (#)=termination code + date + time | |
| Circuit Breaker | |
| 23/70: audit file | |
| Name: Circuit Breaker 5 | |
| Date: 10:49 pm Sun May 03, 1987 | |
| One more thing to check on the audit file dump /no5text/rcv/aimrc. | |
| I would think the audit file is like audit on a VAX it just checks your access | |
| level if your insuficient you can't read that file. | |
| 24/70: Circuit Breaker | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 1:11 am Mon May 04, 1987 | |
| (Trying hard to leave an intelligble post) | |
| Circuit Breaker, what LMOS system do you have access to? Do you (it looks | |
| like it to me) have access to only the unix Front End system, or do you have | |
| the IBM VM370 host processor? Anyway, not all front ends are the same, try | |
| accessing the Cross Front End (XFE) via the Network Manager program | |
| (/usr/lbin, I think) nmx or the NMstatus program and checking for those | |
| specific files you posted about. I'll have to check the LMOS I have access to | |
| and see if those particular files you posted about exist. You also might want | |
| to look at the CRSAB RSA's help files for asyncronous terminal connections in | |
| the help directories. You are probably already good at unix, but try this to | |
| locate those help dirs: | |
| $ cd / | |
| $ du *>/dev/du.txt& | |
| Then in a few minutes, do | |
| $ cd /dev | |
| $ cat du.txt | |
| That will give you a listing of all the directories on that system, and if | |
| you see any that resemble help files then go there and cat everything... | |
| Phantom | |
| 25/70: Payphones (again) | |
| Name: Icarus 15 | |
| Date: 3:08 am Mon May 04, 1987 | |
| If the wires are exposed leading up to the payphone, and you hooked up handset | |
| to the appropriate wires, can you make direct calls? If the case is that you | |
| can, there are many phones I know of that do not have the metal encasing | |
| around the wires. I have to try it. I am pretty sure that bypassing the | |
| simple hardware of the payphone console itself does not grant open access to | |
| all outside lines. Or does it? | |
| 26/70: LMOS/Unix | |
| Name: Evil Jay 26 | |
| Date: 4:18 am Mon May 04, 1987 | |
| Could someone print out some commands to do on LMOS? What exactly can | |
| be done on the system. Please explain. Also, how do you turn off the log | |
| when logging into a Unix, and if possible, could someone leave me a C prg | |
| to give my account root priveledges. Terminus was playing around, and | |
| letting me check out one of these prgs but I never got a chance to save/copy | |
| it. Thanks/... | |
| -Jay | |
| 27/70: Payphone Wires..... | |
| Name: The Disk Jockey 13 | |
| Date: 7:33 am Mon May 04, 1987 | |
| At the school in Indiana that I went to, there were tunnels that connected | |
| every building in the school together and dated back to the early 1900's, so | |
| we would get drunk and cruise down there and check out old crap that you find | |
| laying around in the basements that some of these tunnels went to. | |
| ANYWAYS, in one of these tunnels there was a HUGE phone block with hundreds | |
| of cable pair. I brought the dandy test-set one night and started trying | |
| different connectors to get a dialtone. When I did get a dialtone, I tried to | |
| dial a local number, only to get a "please deposit 20 cents" recording, so my | |
| guess from that experiance would be that the phone doesn't make much of a | |
| difference, and that you would NOT be able to dial direct calls on it. | |
| I have a driver's license that says I'm like 24, and I look it, so I too can | |
| buy for any who need it. Michigan licenses are the easiest to change, just as | |
| (ask) any Michigan person who was born in 1967. | |
| -The Disk Jockey | |
| 28/70: Fortresses/LMOS commands | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 7:22 pm Mon May 04, 1987 | |
| Come to think of it, it is the actual line and not the phone in most cases, | |
| take a look at the Class of Service or Universal Service Order Code in an ISVH | |
| (ISH) or an INQ from COSMOS or get it via an Basic Output Report (BOR). Now, | |
| if you really wanted to go out of your way to 'fix' a payphone to where you | |
| could dial out normally, you might be able to accomplish this via RC-MAC, or | |
| maybe an SCC. But if you did do this it would almost certainly die when the | |
| bill came. | |
| Phantom | |
| PS-I will post up pertinent data from an ISH upon various payphones next time | |
| I log on, if anyone would like to see it. | |
| 29/70: Payphone ISH | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 7:43 pm Mon May 04, 1987 | |
| Ok, I ISHed a few payphones and here's the results: | |
| The STatus was (of course) WK (Working), the TYPE was C (Coin), the Class of | |
| Service (CS) is CN (CoiN), the Universal Service Order Code (US) is 1PC, which | |
| means single party something.. can't remember. The Line Class Code (LCC) field | |
| contained CDF, I don't know what CDF means though. | |
| On older post-pay telephones (the kind where it either gives you a loud | |
| annoying 'buzz' when the calling party answers, or the kind that allows you to | |
| hear them but them not hear you until you put your coins in) probably have a | |
| US of 1PP (Single party, Post Pay), and Coin First phones (the kind that you | |
| must put money in to get a dialtone) have a US of 1CF (Single party, Coin | |
| First). | |
| Hope that helped, | |
| Phantom | |
| 30/70: Question | |
| Name: Cap'N Crax 10 | |
| Date: 3:43 am Tue May 05, 1987 | |
| Does anyone know why, and how, it | |
| is allowable to place collect calls | |
| to loop lines. I know that this | |
| does work, as I have done it. I | |
| was wondering how it (loop) is | |
| classified, why it passes the billing | |
| verify, and to whom is the billing | |
| allocated? It is obviously recorded | |
| on AMA, and it apparently pissed | |
| off Bell. No more loop... | |
| C^2 | |
| 31/70: -------- | |
| Name: Circuit Breaker 5 | |
| Date: 10:25 pm Tue May 05, 1987 | |
| Phantom what do you mean 'trying for an inteligible post'? I was telling Doom | |
| how to get some AMA data from LMOS. I am sure the LMOS you have access to has | |
| an AMA audit file, its just a security feature. | |
| 32/70: Call Blocking.... | |
| Name: The Mad Hacker 47 | |
| Date: 7:06 pm Wed May 06, 1987 | |
| What Is Call Blocking? It has something to do with a condition in ANI/ONI. I | |
| read it in My Cama Manual and It was vague. Any Help? | |
| -TMH | |
| 33/70: A few LMOS commands | |
| Name: Control C 8 | |
| Date: 8:46 pm Wed May 06, 1987 | |
| Here's some /FOR commands | |
| TV - Trouble Verification | |
| RJR and DMLR are jepordary reports.. | |
| Shit I had some more, but I can't rember.. | |
| Control | |
| 34/70: datakits... | |
| Name: Slave Driver 58 | |
| Date: 11:56 am Thu May 07, 1987 | |
| Does anyone have any experience | |
| hacking datakits? | |
| NODE dkeasta blah blah | |
| NETWORK ACCESS PASSWORD: | |
| any ideas on the password? Anyone have -any- idea of the format, length etc? | |
| any help appreciated.. | |
| Steve Driver | |
| ps. I know what they do, I just need to get on famous last words| | |
| 35/70: More LMOS | |
| Name: Doom Prophet 21 | |
| Date: 8:28 pm Thu May 07, 1987 | |
| Ok, I hadn't seen that in LMOS yet, CB, thanks for the info. There are other | |
| ways to access the info in an intermediate call store section/buffer of sorts | |
| from SCCS, and of course the AMARC systems. On another board, Phantom asked | |
| what AMASE was, I would think that it could be an abbreviated form of 'AMA | |
| Sensor', you know, BDT's, CDA's, and ESS software format sensors, or special | |
| VSS sensors maybe. | |
| On LMOS..some of the things are common knowledge (in BSTJ's and all) but I | |
| will post a few and what they do. | |
| Let's see, to screen status troubles, ttry /FOR MSCR. You may have to know | |
| employee codes of the screener and the MC code, it's been a while since I've | |
| been on. | |
| The different actions in the Mechanized Screener transactions are run an MLT | |
| test, get job and work info, run RST transaction, read mail, clear the mask | |
| (indicating no action), review desk items, return to original status, put item | |
| on the Local Test Desk (used to test lines that the MLT/LTS equipment can't | |
| for some reason, such as selective ringing multiparty lines), put screener in | |
| the off duty status (returning work items into the pool I believe). Others are | |
| /Te (Trouble Entry), DISP, etc. | |
| Something somewhat interesting, in the /tmp direcoty for an FE, look at the | |
| Console/log0 file, which contains countters and info on how many certain | |
| transactions have been done for a certain time period (RBOR is in there but | |
| I'm not sure about the rest). Other commands do things like add changes to | |
| LMOS tables, look at work summaries, check all jobs related to a certain CTTN | |
| (cable trouble ticket number) or TTN, and review all work items for specific | |
| FE's. If anyone wants anything specific about some of these commands leave ma | |
| (me) a letter or post since it seems the discussion is going good. I'm sure | |
| Marauder or others could proably correct me on a few points, but oh well. | |
| Doom | |
| 36/70: Call Blocking/Loops/etc. | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 11:09 pm Thu May 07, 1987 | |
| Circuit Breaker, what I meant was that I was fucked up, and having a hard | |
| time typing legibly. That's all. | |
| Call blocking is a vague term, can you tell us what it relates to, CAMA, | |
| ANI, PBX's, or what? A basic description is that it is what happens when the | |
| network is operating at peak, and all trunks are busy, and thus the caller | |
| gets a re-order or is left sitting there. | |
| Be more specific if you can, because there is also a thing called 'blocking' | |
| on PBX's which is similar but on a smaller scale. | |
| To whoever asked about the collect call to the loop, well loop-around | |
| numbers are probably either an Official or a Test line, at least the ones I | |
| have seen. So unless they set some type of screening to it so it can't accept | |
| collect calls then you could collect call a loop, but hope that you didn't | |
| dial direct from your home because your number would be on their phone bill. | |
| Control C, since you seem to have a manual or something on ESS, could you | |
| tell me what a RC15 report is, I am very confused about them. Thanks... | |
| Phantom | |
| 37/70: Coin Tests... | |
| Name: The Mad Hacker 47 | |
| Date: 12:07 am Fri May 08, 1987 | |
| SFD posted in the previous sub abour coin tests. I ask you this. The CO, upon | |
| completion of a call, removes -48 volts from the ring, ground from the tip and | |
| either a -130 volts(Refund) or +130 Volts(Collect) is applied to the tip to | |
| operate the cion relay in the phone. If Someone were to have acces to the | |
| exposed wires outside of the phone, wouldn't they be able to simulate the | |
| voltage necessary to refund their own money(Theoretically speaking if they | |
| could simulate the voltage in a Phone Booth of course)? Would that Be | |
| Possible? I also broke out my testboard, Station, and network Manuals and | |
| Found that their is some significance in turning the handset of the payphone | |
| upside down. I can't find out exactly why yet, but it is all over the "Coin | |
| Maintenance Check Booklet" that bell uses as reference for Coin Stations. I | |
| will search more through the book and see what I can find. | |
| The Mad Hacker | |
| 38/70: Collect call | |
| Name: Icarus 15 | |
| Date: 12:52 am Fri May 08, 1987 | |
| If you hack a mailphone system of some kind that only requires the number to | |
| be called and the initia message will be played, then you can have the message | |
| say, "Hello?........Sure. hangup|" This will enable you to make a third party | |
| billing call to anyone and use the mailphone system as the party paying for | |
| the call. The operator will cal up the mailphone, the msg will play and | |
| she'll hear the person being billed say, "Sure." when asked if they accept the | |
| charge. | |
| In any case if you want to make a call bill it to 312-410-7132, and it will go | |
| straight through. | |
| Icarus | |
| 39/70: Call blocking | |
| Name: Lotus 38 | |
| Date: 3:44 am Fri May 08, 1987 | |
| I know that in parts of Florida that a new system uses the term "call | |
| blocking" simply to stop someone in your co's area from calling you. You would | |
| do something like "*80+number to block" and when that number calls you , a | |
| "You can not dial XXX-XXXX at this time. Try again later" | |
| Other features include immediate call back. This allows you to hit a few | |
| keys on the phone and call back whomever just called you (again, only if | |
| they are in your local co). | |
| Anyone else have info on this? | |
| 40/70: Collect Calls..... | |
| Name: The Disk Jockey 13 | |
| Date: 6:55 am Fri May 08, 1987 | |
| A few years ago, in school (out of state) everyone had their ways making free | |
| calls, someone had a number to a recording, something like that VMS, and it | |
| said "This number accepts all collect and 3rd party billing calls" and it | |
| worked all the time. | |
| Another way is to make a collect call to an out-of-state extender. Let me say | |
| it this way.... | |
| I'm calling from 219 (Indiana) and I call the local MCI node in Chicago | |
| collect. The operator asks "your name" and you say in a fem voice | |
| "Brenda"....the call will go through, and you will here the usual MCI tone. | |
| RIGHT AWAY, you press a number on t touch tone pad, this will silent the MCI | |
| tone. Then you say in your own voice "Hello?" for all the operator knows, | |
| you are the one that answered! The only problem is that you have to work | |
| fast, else you get a re-order in about 15 seconds. | |
| -The Disk Jockey | |
| 41/70: Call Blocking... | |
| Name: The Mad Hacker 47 | |
| Date: 9:19 am Fri May 08, 1987 | |
| I will get more specific on the Call Blocking I am refering to. It isn't what | |
| Lotus suggested. That Sounds more like DMS-100 Options(Sounds Exactly like | |
| them, in fact). I thought that the FCC wouldn't allow AT&T to use those | |
| options, though. Maybe I was mistaken. I think that the call blocking I was | |
| refering to is more towards the overload on any paticular circuit as was | |
| mentioned before. | |
| The Mad Hacker | |
| 42/70: toll phone | |
| Name: Circuit Breaker 5 | |
| Date: 10:46 pm Fri May 08, 1987 | |
| In most areas in Europe, the wire to payphones hang out below the phone if you | |
| splice those wires to you handset, you can dial direct without any imitation | |
| tones. | |
| 43/70: Call Blocking | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 2:23 am Sat May 09, 1987 | |
| Call Blocking is indeed a feature of (C)LASS....but that CLASS feature is | |
| LATA based around LCCIS, not upon a CO and intraoffice calls. For more info | |
| read any CLASS file, or check out LOD/H TJ 1, file 1, CLASS, by Videosmith. | |
| It explains it pretty clearly. There was a PBX test number in 305 (the testing | |
| grounds of CLASS) that I had gotten somewhere that had a demo of CLASS | |
| features on it, such as Call trace, selective call forwarding, call blocking, | |
| etc. It was called Touch-Star, I think, or maybe Touch-Tel, one of the two. | |
| Anyway, LASS is used in the 717 (Harrisburg, PA) NPA. | |
| Phantom | |
| 44/70: Addition. | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 2:32 am Sat May 09, 1987 | |
| (I forgot something) | |
| DMS-100 does have something like it's own call blocking. It can be used to | |
| restrict certain types of lines from calling other types. The destination | |
| switch checks the information sent in from the (intraoffice) DN, (I think the | |
| Screening Code, probably) or from an INC (incoming trunk). This can be done to | |
| restrict access to official lines and such. | |
| Phantom | |
| 45/70: i thought | |
| Name: Lucifer 666 43 | |
| Date: 2:26 am Sun May 10, 1987 | |
| none of the DMS features blocking other people from calling you, etc| were | |
| not implemented.... I thought that the user-choice stuff was never put in... | |
| was I wrong? | |
| L666 | |
| 46/70: RC15? | |
| Name: Control C 8 | |
| Date: 11:17 am Sun May 10, 1987 | |
| Phantom, | |
| Are you sure the RC15 exists? RC's start at 16 and end at 29.. | |
| Maby I'm just screwed... | |
| 47/70: FACS | |
| Name: Mad Hatter 51 | |
| Date: 5:57 pm Tue May 12, 1987 | |
| Can anyone fill me in on FACS? I got the file by Sharp Razor and Doom Prophet | |
| has told me about it somewhat, but can anyone explain detailed info on it? | |
| Thanks (d00d)... | |
| -Hatter | |
| .s | |
| 48/70: TC15 | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 7:21 pm Tue May 12, 1987 | |
| Actually, it's a TC15 report on a 1AESS... not RC15. Sorry about that. A TC15 | |
| is very long and has a few acronyms in it that I don't recognize. About the | |
| only one I can remember right now was PUC, Peripheral Unit Controller. | |
| For those of you who have problems with the acronyms posted here, you might | |
| want to check the N)eed acronyms option from the main menu on this board. This | |
| is an acronym list that I made a while back and gave to TK, and he put a few | |
| in himself. It's basically correct as far as I know, so please let's not add | |
| one unless you are sure. | |
| Phantom | |
| 49/70: Carot, etc. | |
| Name: Doom Prophet 21 | |
| Date: 4:41 pm Fri May 15, 1987 | |
| Well, I don't know that much about FACS, although I don't believe that it | |
| really acts as a replacement for COSMOS, more like an integration/mini datakit | |
| sort of thing for the different systems related to cosmos. | |
| Mad Hatter was asking about CAROT in mail, and I looked through some stuff and | |
| here is some info about the system. It consists of the two processors for the | |
| CAROT (database section), the data and the test processor. The TP controls and | |
| directs the ROTL's and the Circuit Maintenance System (I've seen CMS-1B and | |
| also CMS-3A, don't know what the current version is). CMS 3A is used with | |
| TIRKS also. Anyway, the CAROT controller (which is supported by the two | |
| processors) can do something like 14 tests at the same time (at night when | |
| their is less traffic on the trunks). The CC also analyzes and sends out the | |
| test results to the appropriate departments or offices (the CO, an SCC or a | |
| CTTU station). The ROTL is accessed just by the technician dialing it, which | |
| is why anyone can dial them. The ROTL is controlled by MF input of the trunk | |
| group and network numbers. I have seen TNN's as being three digits, but I | |
| guess it depends upon the office size. The ROTL seizes the trunk to be tested. | |
| The ATMS responder (Automated Trunk Measurement System) is connected to the | |
| ends of the tested trunk to receive tthe test measurements. The ROTL somehow | |
| attaches test equipment to the origiinating end of the trunk. Other test lins | |
| are used for the terminating end (going into another CO or switch)...I'm sure | |
| everyone knows there are dialups to CAROT, these are from the Remote User | |
| Multiplex, the ports for remote terminals to call in through (unless the | |
| dialup serves for some type of diagnostics testing upon the test equimpment | |
| itself). 16 people can be on the same RUM....I don't know if that means 16 | |
| people can dial the same dialup and somehow still connect (highly improbable). | |
| Lex would probably know more about it. | |
| Doom | |
| 50/70: Advanced 800 | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 5:00 pm Fri May 15, 1987 | |
| Well, I know that many people have been told that to get translations for 800 | |
| numbers, they should call an office that has access to the NCP database. I | |
| just read a bit about it in CO which I thought was sort of interesting. It's | |
| part of DSDC (Direct Services Dialing Capabilities). The subscriber dials the | |
| 800 number which is then routed to a 4E. From there, it goes to the ACP | |
| (Action Control Point or is it ACtion Point?|) which is software that | |
| determines the special type of call (toll free/976/etc.). The ACP gets it's | |
| (its) information from the NCP which is the Network Control Point. The NCP | |
| database receives the call information through CCS and checks on the customer | |
| service information that the call information goes with, thereby determining | |
| how to route the call and sends the info back to the ACP. The SMS (Service | |
| Management System) is used to update information and for definition of that | |
| information. The NCP database can contain various information such as where | |
| the translation routes determined by origin of call or time of day too. | |
| I have a question about CCS. What is signifigant about the number version? I | |
| mean, is the information transmitted done differently (different protocol or | |
| manner of sending) or is it just updates to the way it's wired up? McBlah | |
| -TK | |
| 51/70: CCS | |
| Name: Mad Hatter 51 | |
| Date: 6:02 pm Fri May 15, 1987 | |
| Randy- I can't seem to find that ancronym or any mention of it. I've followed | |
| your post all they way up to that. The Advanced 800 Service you read had to | |
| do with the SPC Network? The paragraph you typed was the same(not word for | |
| word) as the one here in the Tech on SPC Net. ACP stands for ACtion Point. | |
| -Hatter | |
| Excuse the time/date of this call.. | |
| 52/70: CCS | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 11:05 pm Fri May 15, 1987 | |
| The CCS that I mentioned (CCS7 presently) is like the modern term for CCIS. | |
| I'm not sure why they changed it, but that's the accepted acronym now. The | |
| information that I got from CO magazine was discussing the BOCs' involvement | |
| in 800 services now. It's highly possible (and probable) that they use the | |
| same method of signaling for this. Hmm...Oh well, still, I want to know about | |
| the different versions of CCS. Later | |
| -TK | |
| 53/70: CCS | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 12:52 pm Sat May 16, 1987 | |
| Ok, the international version of CCS is known as as CCITT6, (or 'the CCITT | |
| signalling system No. 6) which are centered around an International Switching | |
| Center (ISC). CCITT No. 6 can identify 2048 trunks (CCS can ID 8192 trunks). | |
| I have some pages from an old BSTJ on CCIS in front of me, they have a good | |
| amount of information about CCITT6 in here. One interesting table inn here is | |
| Calling parties categries, which are in bits 13-16 of a CCITT No. 6 'message', | |
| there are provisions for operators in French, English, German, Russian, and | |
| Spanish, and other user selectable languages, data call, test call, spare, | |
| etc. I'll have to read more about this, it would be interesting to find out | |
| how you could make an int'l call over CCITT No. 6 (or maybe 7 now as someone | |
| said) as a test call. | |
| Phantom | |
| 54/70: Badgers... | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 7:38 pm Sat May 16, 1987 | |
| A long, long time ago, Jester Sluggo found some stuff about Badgers while | |
| trashing. Just today, in conversation, I found out a bit about what these | |
| are. It is a piece of machinery (Badger is the brand name) which is located | |
| in the SCC (supposedly). It is used for remote trunk testing and it grabs the | |
| circuit to be tested and runs whatever on it. I have a feeling this is more | |
| for the independant telcos but I couldn't say for sure. Later | |
| -TK | |
| 55/70: Here's...... | |
| Name: The Disk Jockey 13 | |
| Date: 12:40 am Mon May 18, 1987 | |
| ..an employee numthat I guess is sort of a Sprint Newsline. | |
| It was LEECHED off of another board, so it remains ted: 8-332-0111 | |
| 56/70: Anyone know? | |
| Name: Cap'N Crax 10 | |
| Date: 2:22 am Mon May 18, 1987 | |
| Does anyone know if either/both 900's and 976's terminate in POTS number? | |
| (Ever?) Something tells me that they probably do.. | |
| C^2 | |
| 57/70: 976/900s | |
| Name: Taran King 1 | |
| Date: 6:35 am Mon May 18, 1987 | |
| I believe that I asked someone that already and neither of them did. They | |
| both were arranged really strangely and didn't have POTS numbers (or at least | |
| not standard POTS numbers). If you could log onto the switch for the 900 or | |
| 976 number, you could probably find out, anyway, if it's got a POTS | |
| translation, but then again, that's a whole different baby. I'll ask again | |
| and repost when I find out unless Phantom and DP beat me to it (likely). Later | |
| -TK | |
| 58/70: 900 and 976 | |
| Name: Kerrang Khan 34 | |
| Date: 4:37 pm Mon May 18, 1987 | |
| Do not terminate in POTS numbers. | |
| k | |
| 59/70: I think.. | |
| Name: Slave Driver 58 | |
| Date: 10:21 am Tue May 19, 1987 | |
| that 900s as in the kind you see on TV, like voting things| terminate in a | |
| 4e office. There is some special device that totals the calls if needed| and | |
| then the people who are using it just call and ask about the numbers... | |
| Steve | |
| 60/70: 900 numbers explained | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 9:35 pm Tue May 19, 1987 | |
| I was really interested in how 900 numbers worked, it is not common phreak | |
| knowledge, so I researched via a BSTJ and a little bit of engineering. | |
| Actually, I wrote a file on the Mass Announcement System (MAS) that is about | |
| 80 sectors, but I never released it because I thought no one gave a fuck. If | |
| anyone here wants this file, mail me and I'll get it to you somehow, or upload | |
| it here. | |
| 900 numbers do terminate in a Number 4 ESS, the 4E that has been allocated | |
| as your MAS node. As of 1980 (old info, I know) there were 7 No. 4 ESS | |
| switches that were MAS nodes. That number might be more now, butt the nodes | |
| were in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, LA, Newar, and Philly. Each one of | |
| these covers a particular part of the country. (oops, that 'Newar' up there is | |
| supposed to be 'Newark'). For instance, if Randy dialed 1-900-555-1212 (the | |
| Dial it 900 service information line) his call would be sent to the Atlanta | |
| No. 4 ESS MAS node. If Mad Hatter dialed the same number, his call would be | |
| sent to the Philly MAS node. (Oh, Alaska and Hawaii are also included in | |
| this). | |
| Back to the original question by Crax, 900 numbers can terminate in a POTS | |
| number, but I have never seen it done, so I would guess that it's not a common | |
| occurance. This is called cut through calling, or technically, Media | |
| Stimulated Calling (MSC). MSC basically sends one call per some unit of time | |
| to a DDD number. | |
| The place that handles the maintenance and administration of all No. 4 ESS | |
| MAS offices is called ONAC, Operations Network Administration Center. I think | |
| the ODAC are centralized in Kansas City, Mo, which seems kind of strange | |
| because there isn't a MAS node there (that I know of). | |
| One interesting thing about MAS services is the way Recent Changes are done, | |
| through an RCRRT2 (Remote Recent Change, don't ask me why the acronym doesn't | |
| match) channel, which is hardwired to ONAC. If one ever trashed ONAC or a 4E | |
| MAS node, you could probably find some actual switch output messages. Those | |
| would be interesting to see. So if anyone ever does any trashing like this | |
| then let me know. | |
| Phantom | |
| 61/70: UNIX logs... | |
| Name: Ax Murderer 7 | |
| Date: 5:33 pm Wed May 20, 1987 | |
| I haven't been on for awhile, but anyways, whoever was questioning UNIX's, | |
| which log are you talking about, the one of Berkley (HIST?). There's quite | |
| a few logs. To get superuser privs on some systems, first go into the /dev/ | |
| section and scan through the files. Almost always there will be a program | |
| in there which will be UNPROTECTED and allow even the lowest scum to use | |
| it. The main point is, in case for some emergency reason, he must log on | |
| from a remote location, and has difficulties, he may process another account. | |
| Ax Murderer | |
| Also, I got TONS of "C" programs. I also am pretty fluent in this. | |
| 62/70: Unix | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 9:02 pm Fri May 22, 1987 | |
| Does anyone know a way to implement something similar to some common unix | |
| commands on a cosnix OS? For instance, the grep command, the find comma the | |
| file command, and a few others. What I wanted to do was list the ascii files | |
| in a cosnix directory (assume the /usr/cosmos directory, where COSMOS three | |
| letter command source is kept, but there couldcii or English Text in it). I | |
| would do it like this on unix: | |
| $ ls -a</tmp/asciick& | |
| Then when that process was done: | |
| $ grep ascii /tmp/asciic/tmp/final& | |
| Then check that file when it was done and it would have a listing of the | |
| ascii files. Since you cuse the type command, and can't use file, I'd rather | |
| not look through a long directory listing, and even then it's ot always ascii. | |
| So does anyone have any shell scripts that might help me out? | |
| Phantom | |
| PS-Sorry for the line noise. | |
| 63/70: RA1 Channel 6 | |
| Name: Icarus 15 | |
| Date: 3:54 am Sun May 24, 1987 | |
| I dialed 1074654 and I heard "RA1 channel 6" repeated 8 times. Then I found | |
| out that I could dial 107xxxx and get the recording. Does anyone know what | |
| that means? | |
| This only worked on some phones. Others, after I dialed 10, I would get the | |
| operator. | |
| Icarus | |
| 64/70: PHREE CALLZ D00DZ | |
| Name: The Leftist 71 | |
| Date: 10:57 pm Sun May 24, 1987 | |
| heh, about the easiest way to bill 3rd party or collect is to call spri nt | |
| operator.. they are dumb, and have no info on you whatsoever.. but you knew | |
| that didnt you?? | |
| 65/70: centrex | |
| Name: The Leftist 71 | |
| Date: 4:52 pm Mon May 25, 1987 | |
| Is there anyone that has any good info, <bell manuals etc..> on Centrex, or | |
| maybe someone out there knows a few things about it that could post?? Centrex | |
| in the home is pretty nice thing to have..only costs about 10 bucks to have it | |
| installed, but its well worth it... more info later.. | |
| 66/70: WELL... | |
| Name: Sir Francis Drake 56 | |
| Date: 7:05 pm Mon May 25, 1987 | |
| I HAVE SOME NON TECH CENTREX MANUALS SOMEWHERE... | |
| I dont think its all that great right now but when the RBOC's are allowed to | |
| do all their software stuff it will be pretty cool. There are allread some | |
| keen centrex packages for voice mail and stuff. | |
| Ill go look for them. | |
| sfd | |
| 67/70: Centrex | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 5:59 pm Sat May 30, 1987 | |
| Leftist, what do you want to know about centrex? I know a bit about the | |
| workings of them, the general description, how they are set up in a CO, etc. | |
| Be more specific in your question... | |
| Phantom | |
| 68/70: Blue boxing | |
| Name: Icarus 15 | |
| Date: 3:28 am Sun May 31, 1987 | |
| I have found that kp and st are not necessary when dialing off of a trunk. | |
| After seizing the trunk, ac+ is all that is needed to call out. This seems | |
| strange. Any comments? | |
| Icarus | |
| 69/70: Reply^ | |
| Name: The Executioner 19 | |
| Date: 4:15 pm Sun May 31, 1987 | |
| You are not seizing an interoffice trunk. | |
| What you are doing is kind of pseudo-boxing, which is what we used to do | |
| here in New Jersey. What would happen is that we would use MCI, get a | |
| destination and then blow 2600. Since there were no restrictions on the | |
| band width, and no filters, we would blow back a dial tone that was possible | |
| to make international as well as alliance calls with crystal clarity. | |
| I don't know the exact name of this but just that we weren't | |
| seizing a trunk. | |
| Ex y | |
| ^ nice space | |
| 70/70: DP Boxing | |
| Name: Phantom Phreaker 46 | |
| Date: 8:41 am Mon Jun 01, 1987 | |
| Icarus, what you are talking about sounds like boxing using a DP (Dial | |
| Pulse) trunk. DP 'boxing' doesn't use KP and ST, they use a time-out feature. | |
| DP is made up of short bursts of 2600Hz tone. It isn't all that common as far | |
| as I know, but some older SxS offices supposedly use it for outpulsing on | |
| interoffice calls and to CAMA for billing. This means that either the homing | |
| CAMA office can record dial pulse trunk signalling, or there is some sort of | |
| sensor to translate it to MF before reception by the CAMA MF digit recievers. | |
| Phantom | |
| Post on Phreak/Hack Sub? No | |
| ^*^ | |
| ========================================================================= | |