| ==Phrack Magazine== | |
| Volume Four, Issue Forty-Three, File 10 of 27 | |
| How to "Hack" BlackJack | |
| By | |
| Lex Luthor | |
| lex@mindvox.phantom.com | |
| Part 2 of 2 (50K) | |
| Card Counting: | |
| -------------- | |
| Card Counting? Don't you have to be some sort of mathematical genius or | |
| have a photographic memory to count cards? No, these are as mythical as that | |
| 415-BUG-1111 "trace detector" number posted on all those old hacker BBSes. | |
| Well, you may now say, what if the casino is using 4, 6, or even 8 decks? | |
| Surely you can't keep track of 300+ cards! Don't sweat these details. Probably | |
| the hardest part about learning to play successful BlackJack has already been | |
| accomplished in the previous section. That is: memorizing the appropriate | |
| basic strategy chart. All you really need to count cards is the ability to | |
| count up to plus or minus twelve or so...by ONES! Of course there are more | |
| complicated systems but that is all you need to do for the simplest ones. | |
| The first card counting systems were developed by our old friend Dr. Thorp. | |
| He determined through mathematical computation that the card that has the most | |
| influence on the deck being in a favorable condition (for the player) was the | |
| five. When the deck is low in fives, the player has a higher advantage than if | |
| it's sparse in any other card. Logic dictated that for a very simple card | |
| counting strategy, simply keep track of the abundance (or lack thereof) of | |
| fives. This is the basis of his "Five Count" system which was later improved | |
| to include tens and renamed the "Ten Count" system. | |
| Today, there are many different card counting systems. Typically, the more | |
| complex a system is, the better your advantage should you master it. However, | |
| the difference between card counting System X and System Y is usually so small | |
| that ease of using the system becomes more important than gaining an | |
| additional .15 % advantage or whatever it is. I am going to restrict the | |
| discussion to a single card counting system: the high/low (also called the | |
| plus/minus) point count. This strategy is very easy to master. Two other | |
| methods that I recommend if you're serious are the Advanced Plus/Minus and the | |
| "Hi-Opt I" systems. The former being similar to the high/low but assigns | |
| fractional values to certain cards as opposed to integer values which are | |
| easier to add in your head. The latter method is considered one of the most | |
| powerful yet reasonable (with respect to complexity) counting systems of all | |
| time and is detailed extensively on pages 213 to 277 of [7]. | |
| The quick and dirty reason why card counting works is this: The player | |
| gains an advantage when a deck has a SHORTAGE of cards valued 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, | |
| 7, 8. When a deck has a SHORTAGE of cards valued 9, 10, Ace; the player has a | |
| DISadvantage. If you can tell when the deck is rich in 9's, 10's, and Aces | |
| (ie, when you hold the advantage) you can do one of the following things: | |
| 1) Bet more money when the deck is favorable to you. | |
| 2) Alter your Basic Strategy play to account for the favorability | |
| thereby increasing the odds of winning a particular hand. | |
| 3) Combine 1 & 2 by betting more AND altering Basic Strategy. | |
| Now lets discuss the +/- Point Count. As you can see from the small chart | |
| below, a plus value is given to low cards, and a minus value is given to high | |
| cards. Notice that 7, 8, and 9 have a value of zero. This is because their | |
| overall effect is negligible as compared to the others. Some systems use a | |
| value of -2 for the Ace instead of -1 and give a value of +1 to the seven | |
| instead of zero. If you are using a BlackJack computer game for practice, | |
| check to see what card counting system(s) it uses. They should offer one of | |
| the above two variations. Learn that one, since it will allow you to prepare | |
| well for actual casino play. See the "Some Comments Regarding Computer | |
| BlackJack Programs for the PC" section for more on this. Now the chart: | |
| +-----------------------------------------+ | |
| | PLUS (+1) || MINUS (-1) | | |
| +-----------------------------------------+ | |
| | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 || 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | A | | |
| +-----------------------------------------+ | |
| | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 || 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | |
| +-----------------------------------------+ | |
| As you may notice, this is a balanced system. There are 20 cards in a deck | |
| that are valued +1: two through six. There are 16 ten value cards and 4 Aces | |
| in a deck (20 total) that are valued -1. The remaining 12 cards (7, 8, 9) have | |
| a value of zero. At the end of a deck the count should be zero. A good drill | |
| to practice is to get a deck of cards, turn them over one by one, and keep | |
| track of the count. If you enter a game mid-way between the deck or shoe, flat | |
| bet until the cards are shuffled. Once the cards are shuffled commence | |
| counting from zero. | |
| Lets do a quick example using ten cards. The following ten cards are shown | |
| in the course of a hand: A, 4, 7, 10, 10, 9, 10, 2, 10, 5. Just so no one gets | |
| lost, we will do one card at a time and then keep the running total: the first | |
| value is -1 (the Ace) & the second is +1 (the 4) = 0 (the current total hand | |
| count). The next card is the 7 which is zero so disregard it. The next card is | |
| a ten so the total count is now -1. The next card is another ten, giving a | |
| total count of -2. The next card is a nine which has a value of zero so ignore | |
| it, total count is still at -2. Next is a ten, total count is at -3. Next is | |
| a two which adds +1 to the minus three yielding a total of -2. A quick look at | |
| the next two cards shows that the two will cancel each other out (-1+1=0). So | |
| at the end of a hand of ten cards dealt to 2 players and the dealer, the point | |
| count is minus two. This provides you with the knowledge that your are at a | |
| slight disadvantage. Your next bet should either be the same or a unit or two | |
| lower. | |
| From this example you see that it would be easier to count cards if you | |
| play in a "cards-up" game. That way you can see all the cards as they are | |
| dealt and count them as they go by. When the dealer deals fast, just count | |
| every two cards. You still count each card but you only add to your total | |
| count after every two cards since many times the two values will cancel each | |
| other out to give a net value of zero, which doesn't need to be added to your | |
| total. If you play in a cards-down game, you may want to consider playing at | |
| third base. The reason being is that in a cards-down game you only see the | |
| other players' cards: | |
| a) if you peek at their hand (not polite but it's not cheating like in poker) | |
| b) if a player busts | |
| c) when the dealer settles each players' hand. | |
| When there are other people at a table, all this happens rather quickly and | |
| you may miss a few cards here and there which essentially invalidates your | |
| count. You can't control how fast the dealer deals, but you can slow things | |
| down when the dealer prompts you for a play decision. | |
| I am not going to discuss changing basic strategy here. The chart you | |
| memorize in Basic Strategy section of this file will be fine for now. If you | |
| are already adept at the plus/minus count then find a book that has a complete | |
| system including the appropriate changes to Basic Strategy that reflect the | |
| current running and/or true count. | |
| For one deck, alter your wager according to the following table: | |
| BET UNITS +/- Running Count | |
| ----------------------------- | |
| 1 +1 or less | |
| 2 +2 or +3 | |
| 3 +4 or +5 | |
| 4 +6 or +7 | |
| 5 +8 or more | |
| Example: After the first hand of a one deck game, the point count is plus | |
| four and you just bet a $5.00 chip. Before the next hand is dealt, wager | |
| $15.00 (three units of $5.00) as the above table mandates. | |
| What if there are four, six, or more decks instead of just one? I recommend | |
| that you perform a "true-count" rather than trying to remember different | |
| betting strategies for different number of deck games. By doing a true count, | |
| the above table can still be used. | |
| The True Count is found by the ensuing equation. I provide an example along | |
| with it for the case of having a running count of +9 with one and a half decks | |
| left unplayed. It doesn't matter how many decks are used, you just have to have | |
| a good eye at guesstimating the number of decks that are left in the shoe. I | |
| just measured the thickness of a deck of cards to be 5/8 (10/16) of an inch. | |
| Hence the thickness of a half deck is 5/16 of an inch. One and a half decks | |
| would be 10/16 + 10/16 + 5/16 = 25/16 or a little over an inch and a half. You | |
| probably see a relationship here. The number of decks is approximately equal | |
| to the height of the cards in inches. Easy. | |
| Running Count +9 | |
| True Count = ---------------------- = ----- = +6 | |
| # of Decks Remaining 1.5 | |
| Looking at the table of betting units above, the proper wager would be four | |
| units. | |
| If you have trouble keeping the count straight in your head, you can use | |
| your chips as a memory storage device. After every hand tally up the net count | |
| and update the running or true count by rearranging your chips. This is | |
| somewhat conspicuous however, and if done blatantly, may get you labeled a | |
| counter. | |
| If for some reason you despise the notion of counting cards, you may want | |
| to pick up Reference [11], "Winning Without Counting". The author writes about | |
| using kinesics (body language) to help determine what the dealers' hole card | |
| is after checking for a Natural. He claims that certain dealers have certain | |
| habits as far as body language is concerned, especially when they check to see | |
| if they have a BlackJack. The dealer will check the hole card if he/she has a | |
| ten value card or an Ace as the up-card. When the hand is over you will see | |
| what the hole card really was. You may be able to discern a certain | |
| characteristic about the dealer, such as a raising of the eyebrows whenever | |
| the hole card is a 2-9 or perhaps a slight frown, etc. There is some | |
| usefulness to this method but I wouldn't rely on it very much at all. I have | |
| only used it for one particular situation. That being when the dealer has a | |
| ten up card and checks to see if the hole card is an Ace. Note that many | |
| dealers check the hole card very quickly and turn up just the corner of the | |
| card so as to prevent any of the players from seeing the card. If the hole | |
| card is an Ace, the dealer will turn over the card and declare a BlackJack. | |
| However, if the hole card is a 4, many times the dealer will double check it. | |
| The reason for this double take is simply that a 4 looks like an Ace from the | |
| corner, get a deck of cards and see for yourself. A 4 really looks like an Ace | |
| and vice-versa when the corner is checked in a QUICK motion. So, if you see | |
| the dealer double check the hole card and NOT declare a BlackJack, you can be | |
| fairly sure the hold card is a four, giving the dealer a total of 14. You can | |
| now adjust your basic strategy play accordingly. This situation has only come | |
| up a few times in my case, but once was when I had a $50.00 bet riding on the | |
| hand and I won the hand by using that additional information. Dr. Julian Braun | |
| has previously calculated that the player has about a 10% advantage over the | |
| house should he/she know what the dealer's hole card is. This is quite | |
| substantial. Of course you have to memorize a specific Basic Strategy chart | |
| for the case of knowing what the dealers' total is in order to obtain the | |
| maximum benefit. I haven't bothered memorizing this chart simply because it is | |
| a rare occurrence to know what the dealers' hole card is. If you sit down at a | |
| table with an inexperienced dealer, you might catch a couple more than usual, | |
| but I don't think it is enough to warrant the extra work unless you want to | |
| turn pro. | |
| Another thing Winning Without Counting mentions is to pay attention to the | |
| arches and warps in the cards. Perhaps a lot of the ten value cards have a | |
| particular warp in them due to all those times the dealer checked for a | |
| BlackJack. The author claims that he has used this to his advantage. Maybe so, | |
| but I don't put much stock in this technique. I have enough things to worry | |
| about while playing. | |
| One last thing. There is no law or rule that says a dealer cannot count | |
| cards. A dealer may count cards because he or she is bored but more likely is | |
| that the casino may encourage counting. The reason being that if the deck is | |
| favorable to the player, the house can know this and "shuffle up". This is | |
| also called preferential shuffling (a game control measure) and it vaporizes | |
| your advantage. | |
| Shuffle Tracking: | |
| ----------------- | |
| Shuffle What? Shuffle Tracking. This is a fairly new (15 years +/-) | |
| technique that has not been publicized very much. One problem with many of the | |
| BlackJack books out there is that they are not hip to the current game. The | |
| obvious reason for this is that many are old or simply re-formulate strategies | |
| that were invented decades ago. It's just like reading "How to Hack the Primos | |
| Version 18 Operating System" today. The file may be interesting, many of the | |
| commands may be the same, but it doesn't detail how to take advantage of, and | |
| subvert the CURRENT version of the OS. | |
| The best definition I have seen is this one quoted from Reference [5]: | |
| "'Shuffle-tracking' is the science of following specific cards through the | |
| shuffling process for the purpose of either keeping them in play or cutting | |
| them out of play." The concept of Shuffle tracking appears to have resulted | |
| from bored mathematician's research and computer simulation of shuffling | |
| cards, a familiar theme to BlackJack you say. The main thing that I hope every | |
| reader gets from this section is that just because someone shuffles a deck (or | |
| decks) of cards does not in any way mean that the cards are "randomized". The | |
| methods mentioned in the two previous sections (Basic Strategy and Card | |
| Counting) ASSUME A RANDOM DISTRIBUTION OF CARDS! That is an important point. | |
| According to some authors, a single deck of cards must be shuffled twenty to | |
| thirty times to ensure a truly random dispersion. If a Casino is using a 6 | |
| deck shoe, that's 120 to 180 shuffles! Obviously they aren't going to shuffle | |
| anywhere near that many times. But don't despair, there are some types of | |
| shuffles which are good, and some that are bad. In fact, if the cards were | |
| always randomly disbursed, then you would not be reading this section due to | |
| it's lack of relevance. As in the Card Counting section, I am going to | |
| restrict the discussion to the basics of shuffle tracking as the combination | |
| of references listed at the end of this section provide a complete discourse of | |
| the topic. | |
| A beneficial (to the player) shuffle for a one deck game is executed by | |
| dividing the deck equally into 26 cards and shuffling them together a minimum | |
| of three times. This allows the cards to be sufficiently intermixed to yield a | |
| fairly random distribution. An adverse shuffle prevents the cards from mixing | |
| completely. | |
| The simplest example is the Unbalanced Shuffle. As its name implies, the | |
| dealer breaks the deck into two unequal stacks. As an example, lets say you | |
| are playing two hands head on with the dealer and the last 10 cards in the | |
| deck are dealt. The result of the hand was that both your hands lost to the | |
| dealer primarily due to the high percentage of low value cards in the clump. | |
| Note that if you were counting, you would have bet a single unit since the | |
| deck was unfavorable. The dealer is now ready to shuffle the deck, and | |
| separates the deck into 31 cards in one stack and 21 in the other stack. The | |
| dealer shuffles the two stacks. If the shuffle is done from the bottom of each | |
| stack on up, the top ten cards of the larger stack will remain intact without | |
| mixing with any of the other cards. Those ten cards can remain in the order | |
| they were just dealt throughout the shuffle if the process of bottom to top | |
| shuffling is not altered. You are now asked to cut the deck. If you don't cut | |
| the deck, the 10 cards that were dealt last hand will be dealt as your first | |
| two hands. The result will be the same as your last and you will lose the two | |
| hands. However, if you cut the deck exactly at the end of those ten cards, you | |
| have just altered the future to your benefit. Those cards will now be placed at | |
| the bottom of the deck. Should the dealer shuffle up early, you will avoid them | |
| altogether. In addition, if you were keeping count, you would know that the | |
| deck was favorable during the first 3-4 hands since there would be an abundance | |
| of tens in the portion of the deck that will be played. You would accordingly | |
| increase you bet size to maximize your winnings. | |
| Some dealers will unknowingly split the deck into unequal stacks. However, | |
| more often than not, they are REQUIRED to split the deck into unequal stacks. | |
| If they are required to do this, they are performing the House Shuffle. The | |
| casino has trained the dealer to shuffle a particular way...on purpose! Why? | |
| Because in the long run, the house will benefit from this because most players | |
| will not cut any bad clumps out of play. If you have played BlackJack in a | |
| casino, how much did you pay attention to the way they shuffled? Like most | |
| people you were probably oblivious to it, perhaps you figured that during the | |
| shuffle would be a good time to ask that hot waitress for another drink. | |
| Regardless, you now see that it may be a good idea to pay attention during the | |
| shuffle instead of that set of "big breastseses" as David Allen Grier says on | |
| the "In Living Color" TV show ;)-8-< | |
| There are a number of shuffle methods, some of which have been labeled as: | |
| the "Zone Shuffle", the "Strip Shuffle", and the "Stutter Shuffle". The Zone | |
| Shuffle is particular to shoe games (multiple deck games) and is probably one | |
| of the most common shuffle methods which is why I mention it here. It is | |
| accomplished by splitting the shoe into 4 to 8 piles depending on the number | |
| of decks in the shoe. Prescribed picks from each pile are made in a very exact | |
| way with intermittent shuffles of each pair of half deck sized stacks. The net | |
| effect is a simple regrouping of the cards pretty much in the same region of | |
| the shoe as they were before, thereby preventing clumps of cards from being | |
| randomly mixed. If the dealer won 40 hands and you won 20, this trend is | |
| likely to continue until you are broke or until the unfavorable bias is | |
| removed through many shuffles. | |
| What if the players are winning the 40 hands and the dealer only 20? If the | |
| dealer has been mentally keeping track of how many hands each side has won in | |
| the shoe, the dealer will probably do one of two things. One is to keep the | |
| shuffle the same, but 'strip' the deck. When a dealer strips a deck, he/she | |
| strips off one card at a time from the shoe letting them fall on top of one | |
| another onto the table. This action causes the order of the cards to be | |
| reversed. The main consequence is to dissipate any clumping advantages (a bunch | |
| of tens in a clump) that the players may have. The second thing the dealer may | |
| do is simply change the way they shuffle to help randomize the cards. | |
| I personally believe that casinos use certain shuffles on purpose for the | |
| sole reason that they gain some sort of advantage. A BlackJack dealer friend | |
| of mine disputes the whole theory of card clumping and shuffle tracking | |
| though. The mathematics and simulation prove the non-random nature of certain | |
| shuffles under controlled conditions. Perhaps in an actual casino environment | |
| the effect isn't as high. Regardless, next time you are playing in a casino | |
| and its time to shuffle a shoe, ask the dealer to CHANGE they WAY he/she | |
| shuffles. The answer will nearly always be NO. Try to appeal to the pit boss | |
| and he/she will probably mumble something about casino policy. Why are they | |
| afraid to change the shuffle? | |
| Relevant Reading: [4], [5] Chapters 5 and 6 pages 71 to 98, [14] pages 463 | |
| to 466, and [15] which is very detailed and accessible via Internet FTP. | |
| Casino Security and Surveillance: | |
| -------------------------------- | |
| I figured this section might get some people's attention. It is important | |
| to know what the casino is capable of as far as detecting cheating (by | |
| employees and customers) and spotting card counters. | |
| EYE IN THE SKY: A two way mirror in the ceiling of the casino. It's not hard | |
| to spot in older casinos as it usually is very long. Before 1973 or so, | |
| employees traversed catwalks in the ceiling and it was easy for dealers and | |
| players to hear when they were being watched. Sometimes dust from the ceiling | |
| would settle down onto a table when someone was above it. Newer casinos use | |
| those big dark plexiglass bubbles with video camera's which should be watched | |
| constantly. These cameras have awesome Z00M capabilities and according to | |
| Reference [9], the cameras can read the word "liberty" on a penny placed on a | |
| BlackJack table. I am sure the resolution is better than that for the latest | |
| equipment. The video images are also taped for use as evidence should anything | |
| that is suspect be detected. Just like computer security audit logs, if no one | |
| pays attention to them, they don't do much good. If you want a job monitoring | |
| gamblers and casino employees, you need to train for about 500 hours (about | |
| twenty 40 hour weeks) to learn all the tricks people try to pull on you. | |
| Pretty intensive program wouldn't you say? | |
| CASINO EMPLOYEES: Then there are the casino employees. The dealers watch the | |
| players, the floor men watch the dealers and the players, the pitbosses watch | |
| the dealers, the floormen, and the players, etc. There may be plain clothes | |
| detectives roaming about. In a casino, everyone is suspect. | |
| BLACK BOOK: A company that you will see mentioned in a lot of casino books is | |
| Griffin Investigations. They periodically update a book that casino's | |
| subscribe to that have pictures and related info on barred card counters and | |
| known casino cheats.....I suppose the "black book" as it is called, is | |
| analogous to the "Bell security hit-lists", that had (have?) files on known | |
| phreaks and hackers. | |
| Social Engineering the Casino: | |
| ------------------------------ | |
| If you are good at getting an ESS operator to enter NET-LINE on DN COE-XXXX, | |
| and at getting those "Engineering Resistant Hard Asses up at SNET (Southern | |
| New England Telephone)" [as The Marauder affectionately calls them] to give | |
| you the new CRSAB number; then this section will be a piece of cake for you | |
| to master. | |
| References [3], [7], and [8] have many stories regarding playing in | |
| casinos, getting barred, and various exploits. I am not going to repeat any of | |
| them here. In each of those books, the authors talk about their first | |
| experiences getting barred. In each case they were fairly bewildered as to why | |
| they were kicked out, at least until some casino employee or owner told them | |
| things like "you're just too good" and the ever diplomatic: "we know your | |
| kind, get the hell out!". | |
| As you probably have gathered thus far, card counters are as undesirable in | |
| a casino as a phone phreak is in a central office. There are a number of | |
| behavioral characteristics which have been attributed to the 'typical' card | |
| counter. Probably the most obvious act of a counter is a large increase in bet | |
| size. If you recall in the Card Counting section, when the deck is favorable, | |
| you bet more. When the deck is unfavorable, you bet less. Dr. Thorp's original | |
| system required a variation in bet size from one to ten units. When the deck | |
| is favorable the system may dictate that you go from a ten dollar bet to a | |
| hundred dollar bet. Kind of gets the attention of the dealer and the pit boss. | |
| However, this type of wild wagering is typical of big money hunch bettors. | |
| Hunch betters will just plop down a bunch of chips at random due to 'hunches'. | |
| Therefore, a large increase in bet size won't necessarily cause you to be | |
| pegged as a counter. | |
| Intense concentration, never taking your eyes off the cards, lack of | |
| emotion...ie, playing like a computer, is pretty much a give away that you are | |
| counting. Other things such as 'acting suspicious', meticulously stacking your | |
| chips, betting in discernable patterns, and a devout abstention from alcohol | |
| may also attract unwanted attention. | |
| Another criteria used for spotting counters is if there are two or more | |
| people playing in concert with one another. Ken Uston is famous for his | |
| BlackJack teams. They have literally won millions of dollars collectively. | |
| When the "Team-LOD" gets together to play, we have to pretend we don't know | |
| each other so as not to attract undue attention ;-) | |
| What I mean by Social Engineering the casino is to list ways that trick the | |
| casino into thinking you are just a dumb tourist who is throwing money away. | |
| Look around, smile, act unconcerned about your bet, don't be afraid to talk to | |
| the dealer, floorperson, or pit boss. Don't play 8 hours straight. Perhaps | |
| order a drink. Things of this nature will help deflect suspicion. | |
| I only recall attracting attention once. The casino wasn't very busy, there | |
| were 3 people at the table including myself. I only had about an hour to play | |
| so I bet aggressively. I started with $5 and $10 but made some $50.00 bets | |
| whenever I got a feeling that I was going to win the next hand (quite the | |
| scientific strategy I know). A woman next to me who seemed to be a fairly | |
| seasoned player made a comment that I was a little too aggressive. The pit boss | |
| hovered about the table. My hour was nearly up, I bet $10.00 for the dealer and | |
| $50.00 for myself. I lost the hand leaving me only $100.00 ahead, and left. The | |
| only thing I could think of besides the betting spread which really wasn't a | |
| big deal was that the casino was FREEZING inside. I was shivering like hell, | |
| it probably looked like I was shaking out of fear of being spotted as a | |
| counter or worse...a cheater. | |
| So what if a casino thinks you are counter? To be honest, there have | |
| probably been less than 1000 people who have been permanently barred from play | |
| (ie, they have their mugs in the black book). A far greater number have been | |
| asked to leave but were not prevented from returning in the future. | |
| Tipping the dealer may not necessarily get the casino off your back but | |
| certainly doesn't hurt. When you toke the dealer, place the chip in the corner | |
| of your betting box a few inches from your bet. You may want to say "we are in | |
| this one together" or some such to make sure they are aware of the tip. This | |
| approach is better than just giving them the chip because their 'fate' is tied | |
| in with yours. If your hand wins, 99 out of 100 times they will take the tip | |
| and the tip's winnings off the table. | |
| The 1 out of 100 that the dealer let the tip+win ride happened to me over | |
| and over again for the better part of a day. It was a week before I had to go | |
| back to college and I was broke, with no money to pay the deposits for rent | |
| and utilities. Basically, if I didn't come up with some money in 7 days, I was | |
| not going back to school. This was 4 years ago BTW. I took out $150 on my | |
| credit card (stupid but hey, I was desperate) and started playing and winning | |
| immediately. I pressed my bets time and time again and in an hour or two had | |
| $500 in front of me (+$350). I started losing a bit so I took a break for a | |
| short while. I went back to a different table with a different dealer. As soon | |
| as I sat down I started winning. I started to tip red chips ($5.00) for the | |
| dealer. The first couple of times he took the $10.00 right away. I kept | |
| winning steadily and continued to toke him. Then he started to let the $10.00 | |
| ride! I was amazed because I had never seen that before. That is when I knew I | |
| was HOT. If the dealer is betting on you to win, that says something. When I | |
| stopped playing I cashed in eight black chips. I left with eight one hundred | |
| dollar bills, a net profit of $650.00, just enough to cover everything. Whew! | |
| I probably tipped close to $100.00 that day, and the dealer must have made | |
| double to triple that due to him betting with me. There were a number of times | |
| when the pit boss wasn't close that the dealer would IGNORE my hit or stand | |
| signal. The first time he did this I repeated myself and he did what I asked | |
| but gave me a 'look'. Needless to say, I lost the hand. After that, if he | |
| 'thought' I said stand, I didn't argue. This occurred when he had a ten as the | |
| up-card so he knew his total from peeking at the hole card. I am not sure if | |
| this is considered cheating because I did not ask him to do this, nor did we | |
| conspire. It just happened a few times, usually when I had $25-$50 bets on the | |
| line which is when I made sure to throw in a red chip for him. | |
| Casino Cheating and Player Cheating: | |
| ------------------------------------ | |
| Cheating by the house is rare in the major casinos ie, those located in | |
| Nevada and Atlantic City. The Nevada Gaming Commission may revoke a casino's | |
| gambling license if a casino is caught cheating players. Granted, there may be | |
| a few employees (dealers, boxmen, whomever) that may cheat players, but it is | |
| extremely doubtful any casino in Nevada or Atlantic City does so on a | |
| casino-wide scale. You definitely should be wary of any casino that is not | |
| regulated such as those found on many cruise ships. Because a casino does not | |
| have to answer to any regulatory agency does not mean it is cheating players. | |
| The fact is that casino's make plenty of money legitimately with the built-in | |
| house advantages and don't really need to cheat players to survive. I provide | |
| some cheating methods here merely to make you aware of the scams. These | |
| techniques are still carried out in crooked underground casinos and private | |
| games. | |
| The single deck hand-held BlackJack game is quite a bit more susceptible to | |
| cheating by both the dealer and the player than games dealt from a shoe. The | |
| preferred method of dealer cheating is called the "second deal". As you may | |
| infer, this technique requires the card mechanic to pretend to deal the top | |
| card but instead deals the card that is immediately under the top card. | |
| Imagine if you could draw a low card when you need a low card, and a high card | |
| when you need a high card. You could win large sums of money in a very short | |
| period. Well, a dealer who has the ability to execute the demanding sleight of | |
| hand movements for second dealing can drain even the best BlackJack player's | |
| bankroll in short order. | |
| If someone is going to deal seconds, they must know what the second card is | |
| if he or she is to benefit. One way to determine the second card is by | |
| peeking. A mechanic will distract you by pointing or gesticulating with the | |
| hand that is holding the deck. "Look! There's Gail Thackeray!". While you are | |
| busy looking, the dealer is covertly peeking at the second card. A more risky | |
| method is pegging. A device called a pegger is used to put small indentations | |
| in the cards that the dealer can feel. Pegging all the ten value cards has | |
| obvious benefits. | |
| Another method is the "high-low pickup". I like this one because it's easy | |
| for a novice to do especially in a place where there are a lot of distractions | |
| for the players. After every hand, the dealer picks up the cards in a high-low | |
| alternating order. The mechanic then proceeds with the "false shuffle" in | |
| which the deck is thought to have been shuffled but in reality the cards | |
| remain in the same order as before the shuffle. As you well know by now, a | |
| high-low-high-low arrangement of the cards would be death to the BlackJack | |
| player. Get dealt a ten and then a 5, you have to hit, so get another ten. | |
| Busted. Since the dealer doesn't lose until he/she busts, all the players who | |
| bust before lose. Bottom dealing and switching hole cards are other techniques | |
| that may be used to cheat players. | |
| For shoe games, there is a device called a "holdout shoe" that essentially | |
| second deals for the dealer. Discreet mirrors and prisms may be contained in | |
| the holdout shoe which only allow the dealer to see what card is next. | |
| Shorting a regular shoe of ten cards will obviously have a detrimental effect | |
| on the BlackJack player. | |
| Player cheating isn't recommended. However, I'll quickly list some of the | |
| methods for awareness purposes. The old stand-by of going up to a table, | |
| grabbing some chips, and running like hell is still done but certainly lacks | |
| originality. Marking cards while you play is another popular method. "The | |
| Daub" technique is done by clandestinely applying a substance that leaves an | |
| almost invisible smudge on the card. High value cards like tens are usually | |
| the targets. One scam mentioned in one of the references was the use of a | |
| special paint that was only visible to specially made contact lenses. The | |
| "hold out" method requires the palming of a card and substituting a better | |
| one. This is usually done when there is big money bet on the hand. One of the | |
| risks to these methods is when the deck is changed since the pit boss always | |
| scrutinizes the decks after they are taken out of play. | |
| Other methods entail playing two hands and switching cards from one hand to | |
| the other, counterfeiting cards and/or casino chips, adding chips after a | |
| winning hand (I have seen this done twice, couldn't believe my eyes but | |
| certainly wasn't going to RAT the thieves out). Some dealers may be careless | |
| when looking at their hole card for a BlackJack. A person behind the dealer on | |
| the other side of the pit may be able to discern the card. The value is then | |
| signalled to a player at the table. Astute pit bosses may notice someone who | |
| is not playing that scratches their head too much though. Wireless signalling | |
| devices have been used for various purposes but some casinos have new | |
| electronic detection systems that monitor certain frequencies for activity. | |
| Some Comments Regarding Computer BlackJack Software for PC's: | |
| --------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| I strongly recommend that you practice using a BlackJack program of some | |
| kind before going out to play with real cash. The first program I used for | |
| 'training' some years ago was "Ken Uston's BlackJack" on my old Apple ][+. | |
| Later I acquired "Beat The House" for the same machine. I recently bought a | |
| program for my IBM and have been using it to refresh my memory regarding basic | |
| strategy, card counting, and money management techniques. I assume you will | |
| recognize the guy's name in the title now that you have read most of this | |
| article. I bought: "Dr. Thorp's Mini BlackJack" by Villa Crespo Software at a | |
| Wal-Mart of all places for a measly $7.88. This is an abridged version | |
| however. Villa Crespo charges $12.95 for it if you order via mail. They also | |
| offer an unabridged version for $29.95 via mail. Villa Crespo (don't ask me | |
| where they got that name) offers other programs for Craps, Video Poker, and | |
| 7-Card Stud in case you are interested in those games of chance. By the way, | |
| on the order form I also noticed "FAILSAFE Computer Guardian (Complete | |
| protection and security for your system)" for $59.95. For some reason any time | |
| a piece of paper has the word 'security' on it, my eyes zero in on it.... | |
| Some features that I liked about this scaled down version of their | |
| BlackJack program were the TUTOR, which advises you on whether to hit, stand, | |
| take insurance (no way), etc. as per Basic Strategy. The Tutor for the | |
| abridged version does NOT take into consideration the card count when making | |
| recommendations though. If you are counting the cards, the program keeps count | |
| also, so if you lose count you can check it by pressing a function key. The | |
| STATS option is neat since it keeps track of things such as how many hands | |
| were dealt, how many you won/lost, etc. and can be printed out so you can | |
| track your progress. The program allows you to save your current session in | |
| case you get the urge to dial up the Internet to check your email, something | |
| that should be done every hour on the hour.... | |
| One thing I did not like about the program was that it allowed you to bet | |
| over your bankroll. I accidentally pushed [F2] (standardized at $500.00 a | |
| bet instead of [F1] (standardized at $5.00 a bet) ---- a slight difference in | |
| wager I'd say. Having only $272.00 in my bankroll didn't stop the program from | |
| executing the command and in my opinion it should have prevented the overdraft. | |
| The first time I played Dr. Thorp's Mini BlackJack, it took me about 95 | |
| hands to double my money. I started with $200.00, bet from $5.00 to $25.00, | |
| never dropped below $180.00 which surprised me, and received 3 BlackJacks. I | |
| won 63 hands, and lost 32. I played head on against the dealer, although the | |
| program allows for up to 6 players. I consider that lucky since I had my fair | |
| share of going broke in later sessions. | |
| My advice when using a BlackJack computer program is: do not start with a | |
| bizzillion dollars or anything like that. Start with the amount that you truly | |
| plan to use when you sit down at an actual table. If you play in a crowded | |
| casino, all the low minimum bet tables (ie: $1.00 to $5.00) will most likely be | |
| filled to capacity and only $10.00 or $15.00 tables will have openings. Keep | |
| this in mind because when you make bets with the computer program, you should | |
| wager no less than whatever the minimum will be at the table you sit down at. | |
| If your bankroll is only $200.00 playing at anything more than a $5.00 minimum | |
| table is pushing it. | |
| Another thing to note is that playing at home is kind of like watching | |
| Jeopardy on TV while you are sitting on the couch. People who have been on the | |
| show always say it was much harder than when they blurted out answers during | |
| dinner with their mouths full (the Heimlich maneuver--a real lifesaver!). The | |
| same thing goes for BlackJack. When you are sitting at an actual table, your | |
| adrenaline is flowing, your heart starts to pump faster, you make irrational | |
| plays especially when you start losing, and odds are you will forget things | |
| that were memorized perfectly. There is no substitute for the real thing and | |
| real experience. | |
| Quick Comments on Other Casino Games: | |
| ------------------------------------- | |
| A few people suggested I briefly mention some of the other casino games so | |
| I added this section. I don't go into much detail at all as this file is too | |
| unwieldy already. Besides, if you want to know more, I am sure you'll pick up | |
| the appropriate reference. Hundreds of books have been published on gambling | |
| and they are available by contacting [2]. My aim here was to mention details | |
| that most people may not be aware of. | |
| BACCARAT: This is the game you see in movies a lot. See [12]'s FAQ for a good | |
| explanation of this game. | |
| CRAPS: Craps is probably the most complicated casino game as far as the | |
| different ways to bet things are concerned but its really not that hard to | |
| learn. I just want to throw one table at you adapted from Reference [13]. The | |
| table won't make much sense unless you are already familiar with craps. In | |
| case you have forgotten or didn't know, craps is 'that dice game'. The purpose | |
| of presenting it is to save you $$$$$ <-- Still love that dollar sign key! hehe | |
| Lamest Bets at the Craps Table | |
| BET PAYS SHOULD PAY YOUR ADVANTAGE | |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Any-7 4 to 1 5 to 1 -16.7 % | |
| 2 (or 12) 30 to 1 35 to 1 -13.9 % | |
| Hard 10 (or 4) 7 to 1 8 to 1 -11.1 % | |
| 3 (or 11) 15 to 1 17 to 1 -11.1 % | |
| Any Craps 37 to 1 8 to 1 -11.1 % | |
| Hard 6 (or 8) 9 to 1 10 to 1 -9.1 % | |
| SLOTS: Playing slots is a gamble. Obviously you say. No, I mean its a gamble | |
| to play them. House advantages are almost never displayed on a particular slot | |
| machine. Different machines and different locations may have different casino | |
| win percentages. When you go up to a slot machine, you have no idea if its' | |
| advantage over you is 5% or 25%. Unless you have been watching it, you don't | |
| know if it just paid off a big jackpot either. I don't play slots as a matter | |
| of principle. If you do play I think there are still some $.05 slots in Vegas. | |
| Play the nickel slots and keep your shirt, especially if its an LOD T-shirt. | |
| VIDEO POKER: Reference [13] gives the following advice regarding video poker: | |
| "...don't expect to win. Manage your money so that you limit your losses." I | |
| think its a bit negative but I can't argue with the logic. Also, as with | |
| slots, you may want to play at a machine that is networked with others which | |
| has a progressive payoff. This way at least you have a chance of making the | |
| big bucks in addition to those periodic small payoffs. | |
| VIDEO BLACKJACK: If you like to avoid people and like BlackJack, you may be | |
| thinking that this is a great way for you to "hack two systems with one | |
| password" and make a little money on the side. Before you start putting | |
| quarter or dollar tokens into video BlackJack machines there are a couple of | |
| things to know. First, you can't use card counting techniques because | |
| every hand is essentially dealt from a new deck. When the computer deals a | |
| hand it is just providing 'random' cards. Perhaps if you saw the source code, | |
| you may be able to determine some sort of bias but I suspect it would be | |
| minuscule at best. The rules vary from machine to machine and the maximum | |
| allowable bet varies also. As with the video poker and video slot machines, | |
| the owner of the machine may set the options to their taste (amount of profit). | |
| Selected Bibliography: | |
| ---------------------- | |
| The following are some references you may want to check out and some of my | |
| sources of information for this article. They are not in any particular order | |
| and the format is far from standard as opposed to my thesis bibliography :) | |
| [1] "BlackJack Forum Newsletter" by RGE Publishing in Oakland California. This | |
| is a quarterly publication which has the location and rule variations info | |
| (among other things) for casinos in the state of Nevada. | |
| [2] The Gamblers Book Club (its really a store) can sell you a sample of the | |
| BlackJack Forum Newsletter for $10.00. They have all kinds of new and out of | |
| print books, used magazines, etc. They are located in Vegas (630 S. 11th St.) | |
| so stop by in person or call 1-800-634-6243 which was valid as of 6/1/93 since | |
| I just gave them a ring...the guy I spoke to was very nice and helpful so I | |
| thought I'd give them a plug here. | |
| [3] "Beat The Dealer" by Dr. Edward O. Thorp. Make sure you get the SECOND | |
| edition (1966) since it has Dr. Julian Braun's additions to the original 1962 | |
| edition. | |
| [4] "Gambling Times Magazine" (now defunct), 'BlackJack Bias Part 1 and 2' July | |
| and August 1987 Issues by Mason Malmuth. This magazine was great because it | |
| kept you up to date on the latest in gambling systems and what casinos are up | |
| to. The article is about the author using his PC to perform simulations | |
| regarding the effects of non-random card distribution on BlackJack. | |
| [5] "Break The Dealer" by Jerry L. Patterson and Eddie Olsen, 1986 Perigee | |
| Books. Worth the money for the chapters on Shuffle Tracking alone. | |
| [6] "The Optimum Strategy in BlackJack" by Roger R. Baldwin, Wilbert E. | |
| Cantey, Herbert Maisel, James P. McDermott. Journal of the American | |
| Statistical Association, September 1956. Eight of ten pages are mathematics. | |
| [7] "The World's Greatest BlackJack Book" revised edition (1987) by Dr. Lance | |
| Humble and Dr. Carl Cooper, Doubleday. I am not sure it is THE world's | |
| greatest, but it is an excellent book. It is 400 pages and provides more | |
| details than you probably care to know about the Hi-Opt I counting system. | |
| [8] "Turning the Tables on Las Vegas" by Ian Anderson, 1978. This is an | |
| excellent book if you were interested in The Social Engineering the Casino | |
| section. The author shares a lot of interesting and funny stories that can | |
| keep you from getting barred. Note that 'Ian Anderson' is the authors' handle. | |
| [9] "Las Vegas, Behind the Tables" by Barney Vinson, 1986, Gollehon Press. | |
| Written by a casino executive, I found it to be quite illuminating. | |
| [10] "Gambling Scams" by Darwin Ortiz, 1990, Carrol Publishing. If you play in | |
| any private games, be sure to read this one to avoid getting screwed. It even | |
| has a section on crooked carnival games. | |
| [11] "Winning Without Counting" by Stanford Wong. This book has an interesting | |
| section on 'Dealer Tells' and how to exploit them. | |
| [12] "Rec.Gambling" Internet USENET Newsgroup. The rec.gambling newsgroup is | |
| an excellent free source of current information on BlackJack and other games. | |
| People who have just gotten back from various casinos post about their playing | |
| results and the treatment from casinos. One person just posted that he was | |
| barred from playing BlackJack (a casino employee told him he could play any | |
| game in the casino EXCEPT BlackJack) after he was ahead only $40.00. The | |
| reason apparently was due to his fairly mechanical play and betting. The | |
| rec.gambling FAQ was message #15912 when I read the newsgroup on 6/8/93. They | |
| plan on posting the FAQ every month or so. I found the FAQ to be very | |
| informative. There is an alt.gambling newsgroup but it is dead with 0 | |
| messages. | |
| [13] "The Winner's Guide to Casino Gambling", revised edition by Edwin | |
| Silberstang, 1989 Plume printing. This book covers a wide range of casino | |
| games and has a large list of gambling terms in the back. | |
| [14] "Gambling and Society" edited by William R. Eadington, 1976. This book | |
| provides plenty of information on the psychology of gambling. I found the | |
| section on 'Who Wants to be a Professional Gambler?' interesting as the study | |
| indicates the types of vocations that show high correlations with being a | |
| professional gambler. One of those vocations with an 'extremely high | |
| correlation' was being a Secret Service agent. Maybe Agent Foley will change | |
| jobs.....he can't do much worse, ahem. Chapter 24 by James N. Hanson is | |
| entitled "Nonlinear Programming Simulation and Gambling Theory Applied to | |
| BlackJack" which some of you programmers might be interested in. | |
| [15] "The BlackJack Shuffle-Tracking Treatise" by Michael R. Hall accessible | |
| via the Internet by anonymous FTP: soda.berkeley.edu in the | |
| pub/rec.gambling/blackjack directory. This is a very detailed 78K file that | |
| was well done. It provides plenty of the nitty-gritty details that I did not | |
| have the space to mention in this article. I highly recommend it. | |
| [16] "Risk of Ruin" by Michael R. Hall available from same source as [15] | |
| above. This paper provides some mathematical formulas for helping you | |
| determine the likelihood of losing portions of your starting bankroll. | |
| Although the equations look complicated, anyone with a $10. scientific | |
| calculator can use them. The author provides source code for a program written | |
| in C that calculates the risk formula. Also get his "Optimal Wagering" file | |
| which helps you determine your bet size. | |
| [17] The movie: "Fever Pitch" starring Ryan 'O Niel. This is the most realistic | |
| movie I have seen regarding the psychology of a gambler. If I recall correctly, | |
| it was made in 1985 and is in most video rental stores. | |
| Final Comments: | |
| --------------- | |
| Let me quickly thank those who took the hour to read my article, recommended | |
| corrections and offered their insightful comments: The Marauder, Mark Tabas, | |
| Professor Falken, Al Capone, Jester Sluggo, and Bruce Sterling. Also, I would | |
| like to thank JLE, my 'gambling mentor' mentioned earlier even though he | |
| doesn't know me as 'lex' and probably will never see this file. | |
| If anyone has comments, corrections, etc. feel free to email me. Kindly | |
| note that I have no interest in receiving flames from any self professed | |
| BlackJack experts out there as I do not claim to be an expert and due to size | |
| restrictions, I couldn't get all that complicated regarding counting | |
| techniques and such. Besides, anyone who wants to get serious will take the | |
| time to thoroughly read the references listed in the previous section. My main | |
| purpose was to familiarize you with the game of BlackJack and provide a | |
| resource which can point you in the right direction for more in-depth | |
| information. Thank you for your time and I hope you learned something from | |
| this article even if you don't put any of the information to use. | |
| If you have something really SEKRET to tell me, here is my PGP Public Key: | |
| -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- | |
| Version: 2.2 | |
| mQCNAiwEHN4AAAEEAMtDxWI2HYsAQO8QhDBYhHvmn3fzGpKFbimxl34XiQ5woU/K | |
| lqbD53ahfnB9ST22yxEvexXW0VGVVfSp9xiUl7d7RsTm7Uas3OaOOiSFIRCVvcG8 | |
| FnWARH0nmELBXYkXXjjvjm2BiCEkn45eFaZPX7KbCuIGVjCe3zltpJGBK2OvAAUR | |
| tCRMZXggTHV0aG9yIDxsZXhAbWluZHZveC5waGFudG9tLmNvbT4= | |
| =LOXY | |
| -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- | |
| End of "How To Hack BlackJack": File 2 of 2 |