| ==Phrack Magazine== | |
| Volume Four, Issue Forty-Four, File 10 of 27 | |
| **************************************************************************** | |
| [Editor's Note: This file is reprinted with permission of InterPact | |
| Press. The actual document contains many pictures, charts, and tables | |
| that due to our format, we were unable to reproduce. We encourage the | |
| reader to contact InterPact Press at 813-393-6600 and order a hard copy | |
| of the document for $25.00] | |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| Protective Measures Against Compromising Electro Magnetic Radiation | |
| Emitted by Video Display Terminals | |
| by Professor Erhart Moller | |
| University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany | |
| 0. Introduction | |
| Compromising electromagnetic radiation emitted by machinery or | |
| instruments used in data processing or communication engineering can be | |
| received, decoded and recorded even across large distances. It is also | |
| possible to recognize the data or information which was processed and | |
| transmitted by the emitting instrument as text in clear. Compromising | |
| emitted electromagnetic radiation thus jeopardizes the protection and | |
| security of data. | |
| The Laboratory for Communication Engineering at the Fachhochschule | |
| Aachen is developing protective measures against compromising emission | |
| of radiation. However, these protective measures can only be effective | |
| if they are derived from the characteristics, the effects, and risks of | |
| compromising emitted electromagnetic radiation. Therefore we first | |
| consider only the forms of appearance and the characteristics of | |
| compromising emitted electromagnetic radiation. | |
| 1. Compromising Emitted Electromagnetic Radiation | |
| In this context one often refers only to the so-called computer | |
| radiation. But this is only one form of compromising emitted | |
| electromagnetic radiation. There are three types of such emissions. | |
| 1.1. Types of Compromising Emitted Electromagnetic Radiation | |
| Figure 1.1 shows an n example of an arbitrary electric device with various | |
| electric connections: a power supply line, a high frequency coaxial | |
| transmission line, and a coolant line with in- and outflux. This device | |
| emits three types of compromising electromagnetic radiation: | |
| 1. electromagnetic radiation in form of electric and magnetic fields | |
| and electromagnetic waves; | |
| 2. electromagnetic waves on the outer surface of all coaxial metallic | |
| connections (shell waves); | |
| 3. electric interference currents and interference voltages in power | |
| lines connected to the device. | |
| Each of the three types can be transformed into the other two. For | |
| instance, shell waves can be emitted as fields or waves. On the other | |
| hand, electromagnetic waves can be caught by a nearby conductor and can | |
| propagate on it as shell waves. These phenomena are the reason for the | |
| difficult control of compromising electromagnetic radiation, and they | |
| imply that one must deal with all and not just one form of compromising | |
| electromagnetic radiation. Also, electromagnetic protection against | |
| compromising emitted radiation must deal with all forms of it. | |
| 1.2. Examples of Compromising Emitted Electromagnetic Radiation | |
| To exemplify the three types of compromising electromagnetic radiation | |
| we consider the monitor depicted in figure 1.2. | |
| 1.2.1. Compromising Electromagnetic Radiation | |
| Figure 1.3. shows the experimental set-up. The video display | |
| terminal is connected via the power line to the power supply. The | |
| power line is surrounded by absorbers so that the terminal can only emit | |
| electromagnetic radiation. The absorbers prevent the generation of | |
| shell waves on the power line. The dipole antenna of the television | |
| receiver is 10 m from the video terminal. Figure 1.4. shows the screen | |
| of the television receiver after it received and decoded the signal. | |
| Not only is the large FH=AC well readable but also the smaller letters. | |
| This demonstration yields the following results: | |
| * The video display terminal emits electromagnetic radiation; | |
| * Despite being within (standards committee) norms the emitted | |
| electromagnetic radiation can be received and decoded across a certain | |
| distance; | |
| * The electromagnetic radiation emitted by the terminal can be decoded | |
| into readable information and symbols on a television screen. | |
| Therefore, this emitted radiation is compromising. | |
| 1.2.2. Compromising Surface or Shell Waves | |
| The video display terminal and the television receiver are positioned as | |
| in figure 1.5. The power line of the terminal is surrounded by a | |
| current transformer clamp which absorbs the shell waves. The television | |
| screen shows again the picture seen in figure 1.4. The quality of the | |
| picture is often better than in the previous case. Another experiment | |
| would demonstrate that secondary shell waves can form on a nearby | |
| conductor. The emitted radiation is then caught by nearby conductors | |
| and continues to propagate as shell waves. These emissions also give | |
| good receptions but are almost uncontrollable along their path of | |
| propagation. | |
| 1.2.3. Demonstration of Compromising Emitted Radiation Through the | |
| Power Line | |
| Figure 1.6 shows the experimental set-up for the proof of compromising | |
| power supply voltages. The video display terminal acts as a generator | |
| whose current and voltage is entered into the power supply. Using a | |
| capacitive line probe, the entered signal can be retrieved and fed into | |
| the television receiver. | |
| This form of transmission is the known basis for intercom systems or | |
| so-called babysitter monitors where the signals are transmitted from | |
| room to room via the energy supply lines in a home. As in the case | |
| of electromagnetic radiation or shell waves, one obtains the same | |
| picture quality as in figure 1.4. | |
| 2. Facts About Compromising Emitted Radiation | |
| Protective measures against compromising emitted radiation are not only | |
| determined by the above-mentions\ed three types of compromising | |
| emissions but also by taking into account the following data: | |
| # level of intensity and spectral distribution; | |
| # frequency (emission frequency) and frequency range; | |
| # directional characteristics of the radiation. | |
| These data can then be used to derive the damping and the | |
| amplitude-frequency response for the protective measure and its | |
| location. | |
| 2.1. Emission Spectrum and Level of Intensity | |
| The spectral distribution of compromising emitted radiation depends on | |
| the frequencies used to generate the picture on a screen. The regular | |
| repetition of dots and lines gives rise to the video and line frequency | |
| which is found in the spectrum. However, the emission of video or line | |
| frequencies is not compromising since their knowledge does not yet give | |
| access to processed data. If the lines are covered regularly by | |
| symbols, a symbol frequency is obtained which is also detectable in the | |
| spectrum. A single symbol consists of a dot or pixel matrix. | |
| The dot matrix of the symbol @ is also known in figure 2.1 The electron | |
| beam scans the individual dots or pixels line-by-line and keys them | |
| bright or dark. This keying is done using the so-called dot or pixel | |
| frequency. For instance, the highest keying frequency is obtained by | |
| scanning the center of the @ symbol since there one has a long sequence | |
| of successive bright and dark pixels. It also follows from figure 2.1 | |
| that the keying is slower, i.e., the keying frequency is lower, along | |
| the upper part of the @ symbol because of a long sequence of only dark | |
| or bright pixels. It follows that the emissions due to the keying | |
| frequency are highly compromising since they give direct information | |
| about the structure of the picture. | |
| Until recently, the frequencies in the following table were used: | |
| video frequency 45 Hz - 55 Hz | |
| line frequency 10 kHz - 20 kHz | |
| symbol frequency 2 MHz - 5 MHz | |
| dot or pixel frequency 15 MHz - 20 MHz. | |
| The pulses for the electron beam are formed in the video part, i.e., the | |
| video amplifier, of the monitor. Therefore, the cathode-grid of the | |
| picture tube and the video amplifier are the main emitters of radiation. | |
| The upper diagram in figure 2.2 shows the calculated spectrum for the | |
| cathode-keying. It represents a sequence of dots from the center of the | |
| @ symbol using a dot-sequential frequency of 18 MHz. The diagram in the | |
| center of figure 2.2 shows the measured spectrum at the keyed cathode of | |
| the picture tube. The agreement between the calculated and measured | |
| spectrum for the frequency is clearly visible. However, the calculated | |
| and measured spectral representation differ in the form of the envelopes. | |
| In the measured spectrum one finds an amplitude increase between 175 MHz | |
| and 225 MHz. This increase is usually found in the same or similar form | |
| in monitors. The reasons for this amplitude increase are design, | |
| construction parts, and dimensions of the video display terminal. In | |
| the lower part of figure 2.2 we see the compromising radiation emitted by | |
| the terminal as measured at a distance of 10 m. The spectrum of the | |
| radiation emitted by the terminal is superimposed by broadcast, radio | |
| and interference spectra since the measurement took place on open | |
| ground. Despite this interference one can recognize the typical form of | |
| the cathode spectrum. The increase in the amplitude between 175 MHz | |
| and 225 MHz presents a particular risk since the television transmitters | |
| for Band III operate within this frequency range and all television sets are | |
| tuned to it (see figure 2.2). | |
| A comparison of the intensity level of the television transmitter with the | |
| level of the compromising radiation in figure 2.2 shows their agreement. | |
| It is therefore not very difficult to receive the compromising radiation in | |
| proximity of the emitter using only a regular television set with normal | |
| sensitivity. | |
| Figure 2.3 shows the spectral distribution of compromising shell waves | |
| emitted by the video display terminal. Here again one recognizes the | |
| particular form of the dot or pixel frequency. The height of the shell wave | |
| spectrum is much lower at higher frequencies than the height of the | |
| radiation spectrum. The shell waves have lower intensity in the range of | |
| broadcast television but higher intensity in the range of cable television. | |
| To receive the shell waves a television set must be cable-ready. | |
| Figure 2.4 shows the spectrum for the third type of emission: the | |
| compromising currents and voltages entering the power supply lines. It | |
| is very similar to the shell wave spectrum. The height of this spectrum at | |
| higher frequencies is even smaller than the shell wave spectrum. In | |
| order to receive any signal a cable-ready television set must be used. | |
| The intensity of the currents and voltages is so high that they can | |
| easily be received using a regular television set with normal | |
| sensitivity. | |
| 2.2. Frequency and Frequency Range | |
| It follows from figures 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 that the best reception for | |
| the three types of emissions is for the following frequencies: | |
| compromising radiation approx. 200 MHz; | |
| compromising shell waves approx. 60 MHz; | |
| compromising voltages approx. 20 MHz. | |
| The video information of the picture on the monitor has a frequency | |
| range of half a spectral arc. The frequency range of the receiver must | |
| therefore be 10 MHz for all three types of emission. | |
| 2.3. Directional Characteristics of the Radiation | |
| Figure 2.5 shows the directional characteristics for compromising | |
| radiation emitted by a video display terminal inside a plastic casing. | |
| According to this diagram the lateral radiation dominates. The field | |
| intensity along the front and back direction is about 30% of the lateral | |
| intensity. The power of the emitted radiation along these directions is | |
| only about 10% of the power emitted laterally. The range for the | |
| emitted radiation along the front and back direction is therefore also | |
| reduced to 30%. This phenomenon suggests for the first time a | |
| protection against compromising radiation, namely proper positioning of | |
| the device. | |
| The compromising shell waves and power line voltages propagate according | |
| to the configuration of the lines. There is no preferred direction. | |
| 2.4. Range | |
| The range of compromising radiation emitted from a video display | |
| terminal is defined as the maximum distance between the emitting | |
| terminal and a television receiver and readable picture. | |
| The range can be very different for the three types of emitted | |
| radiation. It depends on the type of emitter and the path of | |
| propagation. | |
| The spectacular ranges for emitted ranges are often quoted - some of | |
| which do not always come from the technical literature - give in general | |
| no indication just under which conditions they were obtained. It is | |
| therefore meaningful to verify these spectacular ranges before using | |
| them. | |
| 2.4.1. The Range of Compromising Emitted Radiation | |
| The dependence of the field intensity on distance is illustrated in | |
| figure 2.6. | |
| The dependence of the range on the receiver used is shown at 25 m, 40 m, | |
| and 80 m. The field intensity at 25 m is just strong enough to receive | |
| a picture with an ordinary television receiver using the set-up in figure | |
| 1.3. If one uses a narrow-band television antenna or a noiseless antenna | |
| amplifier than the field intensities at 40 m and 80 m, respectively, are | |
| still strong enough to receive a legible picture. | |
| The flattening out of the curve at large distances suggests that the | |
| range can be increased to several hundred meters by using more sensitive | |
| antenna or better receivers. The range can also be increased through a | |
| high altitude connection, for instance, if both emitter and receiver are | |
| in or on a high rise. This was verified by an experiment involving two | |
| high rises separated by over 150 m. A very clear picture was received | |
| using a relatively simple antenna with G = 6 db. | |
| 2.4.2. Range of Compromising Shell Waves | |
| Measurements have shown that shell waves can propagate across a large | |
| area without any noticeable damping if only the surrounding metallic | |
| conductors extend also across the entire area. | |
| The propagation is reduced considerably by a metallic conductor that | |
| crosses metallic surfaces such as metal walls or metallic grids such as | |
| reinforcements in concrete walls. | |
| Dissipative building materials also damp shell waves. Lightweight | |
| construction such as the use of dry walls or plastic walls in large | |
| buildings increases the range of shell waves to about 100 m without the | |
| picture becoming illegible. | |
| 2.4.3 Range of Emissions Through Power Supply Lines | |
| In this case the conditions are even less clear than in the previous | |
| cases. It must be assumed that inside a building the compromising | |
| currents and voltages can be received through the phase of the power | |
| supply lines feeding the video display terminal . The possibility of | |
| receiving the signal through other phase lines by coupling across phases | |
| in the power supply line cannot be excluded. | |
| The range depends very much on the type of set-up and the instruments | |
| used. It is conceivable that a range of about 100 m can be obtained. | |
| 3. Protective Measures | |
| Protective measures fall into three categories: | |
| - modification of devices and instruments by changing procedures | |
| and circuitry; | |
| - heterodyning by noise or signals from external sources; | |
| - shielding, interlocking, and filtering. | |
| 3.1. Instrument Modification | |
| The instrument modifications consist of changing the signal processing | |
| method and the circuitry of the instrument. It is the objective of | |
| these measures to alter the spectral distribution and intensity of the | |
| emitted radiation in such a way that the reception by television sets or | |
| slightly modified television sets is no longer possible. | |
| For instance, a change of procedure could consist of a considerable | |
| increase in the dot or pixel frequency, the symbol and line frequencies. | |
| A reduction in the impulse amplitude and impulse slope also changes the | |
| reduction in the impulse slope also changes emission spectrum so that | |
| reception is rendered more difficult. However, the subsequent | |
| modification of the video display terminal has serious disadvantages of | |
| its own: First of all, the user of video display terminals does in | |
| general not possess the personal and apparative equipment to perform the | |
| modifications. To complicate things further, the so-modified | |
| instruments loose their manufacturer's warranty and also their permit of | |
| operation issued by governmental telecommunication offices. A subsequent | |
| instrument modification by the user is for these reasons in general out | |
| of question. | |
| 3.2. HETERODYNING STRATEGY | |
| We refer to a protective measure as a heterodyning strategy whenever the | |
| compromising emitted radiation is superimposed by electromagnetic noise | |
| of specific electromagnetic signals. | |
| The television set receives the compromising emitted radiation together | |
| with the superimposed noise of spurious signal. The noise or the | |
| spurious signal are such that a filtering out or decoding of the | |
| compromising emitted radiation by simple means is impossible. | |
| Since the noise and the spurious signal not only interfere with the | |
| television receiver of the listener but also with other television sets | |
| in the vicinity the heterodyning strategy is by all means in violation | |
| with the laws and regulations governing telecommunications. As far as | |
| is known, this is a protective measure only used under extremely | |
| important circumstances involving high government officials. | |
| 3.3 Shielding | |
| In contrast to the previously considered protective measures, shielding | |
| has two important advantages: | |
| * shielding protects not only against compromising emitted radiation | |
| but also against electromagnetic emissions which can enter data | |
| processing devices from the outside and cause interference; | |
| * furthermore, shielding neither violates the laws governing the use | |
| of telecommunications nor does it jeopardize the manufacturer's | |
| warranty. | |
| The term shielding is used here to describe, shielding, interlocking, | |
| and filtering. | |
| 3.3.1. Shielding Data | |
| The requirements on a shield are described by the shield damping. The | |
| shield damping is twenty times the logarithm of the ratio between the | |
| electric or magnetic field intensity inside the shield and outside the | |
| shield. | |
| Actual applications and individual situations may require different | |
| values for the shield. The shield data are derived from the so-called | |
| zone model. In the zone model one considers the type and intensity of | |
| the emitted radiation, the composition of the path of propagation, and | |
| the local accessibility for the receiver. | |
| The shield data not only influence the shield damping but also the | |
| frequency range of the shield's effectiveness. Figure 3.1 shows a | |
| diagram listing different types if shields according to regulations MIL | |
| STD 285 and 461B, NSA 656, and VG norms 95 375. | |
| 3.3.2. Applicability of Shielding | |
| Electromagnetic shielding can be used on emitting or interfered with | |
| instruments, on building and rooms, and on mobile cabins. | |
| 3.3.2.1. Shielding of Instruments | |
| The shielding of instruments though it can often be done very quickly | |
| and effortlessly is not without problems. | |
| In general but especially after subsequent installation, it can lead to | |
| a loss in design and styling of the shielded device. Openings in the | |
| shield, for instance for ventilation or control and operating elements, | |
| cannot always be sealed off completely. In this case they are emission | |
| openings with particularly high emission rates. | |
| Trying to maintain ergonometric conditions - good viewing conditions for | |
| the users - renders the shielding of screens especially difficult. If | |
| the casing of the instruments is not made of metal but of plastic, the | |
| following shielding materials are considered: metal foils, metal cloth, | |
| metal-coated plastics, electrolytical layers and coats of metallic paint | |
| or paste. Recently, the plastics industry is also offering metallized | |
| plies of fabric. Such glasses are for instance offered by VEGLA, | |
| Aachen. Ventilation openings are sealed off with metallic fabric of | |
| honey-comb wirings. | |
| Interlocking systems and filters on all leads coming out of the | |
| instrument prevent the emission of compromising shell waves and power | |
| supply voltages. | |
| 3.3.2.2. Building and Room Shielding | |
| There are some advantages in shielding buildings and rooms. The | |
| building and room shielding lies solely in the competence of the user. | |
| Minor restrictions dealing with the static of the building and local | |
| building regulations only occur with external shielding. Building and | |
| room shielding offers a protection that is independent of the instrument | |
| or its type. It is a lasting and effective protection. Maintenance is | |
| minimal, and subsequent costs hardly exist. Interior design and room | |
| lay-out are not changed. | |
| If one requires better shielding values or a building and room design | |
| which emphasizes better comfort than greater expenses and thus higher | |
| costs will occur. | |
| 3.3.2.3. Cabin Shielding | |
| Cabin shielding has all the advantages of building and room shielding. | |
| In addition, cabin shielding is not affected by the static of the | |
| building or local building regulations. Furthermore, cabin shielding | |
| requires less expenses and costs than building or room shielding. | |
| However, shielded cabins do not offer the same comfort or interior | |
| design as shielded buildings or rooms. | |
| 3.3.3. Shielding Components | |
| Electromagnetic shielding consists of three components: | |
| # the actual shield together with various structural elements as a | |
| protection against emitted radiation; | |
| # the interlocking of all non-electric and electric supply lines to | |
| protect against shell waves; | |
| # electric filters at all supply lines to protect against compromising | |
| power supply voltages. | |
| 3.3.3.1. The Electromagnetic Shield | |
| The shield consists of the hull and the shielding structural elements. | |
| 3.3.3.1.1. Shield Hull - Method and Construction | |
| In general, one uses metal sheets or metal foil to construct | |
| electromagnetic shields for buildings and rooms. If one lowers the | |
| requirements on the shield damping and the upper limit frequency then | |
| screen wire, metallic nets, and - if properly constructed - even the | |
| reinforced wire net in concrete can be used; the obvious disadvantage | |
| is that the settlements or movements of the building can cause cracks | |
| that will render the shield ineffective. | |
| Therefore, only metal shields or strong wire netting is used for the | |
| construction of electromagnetically shielded cabins. | |
| The building or room shield can be built using several construction | |
| principles. Figure 3.2 above shows the essential construction principles. | |
| For the Sandwich construction, the shield is between the outer and inner | |
| layer of the wall. A new type of construction uses the Principle of | |
| the Lost Form. The shield itself which consists of 3 to 5 mm thick | |
| sheet iron is used as an inner layer in the manufacturing of concrete | |
| walls. The sheets touch one another and have to be welded together at | |
| the contact points. If the building or room shields he\ave to satisfy a | |
| special purpose then they have to be grounded at only one point; they | |
| have to be assembled in such a way that they electrically insulate | |
| against the building or room walls. The so-called inner shields offer | |
| this protection. In simple cases, the inners shield is placed on top of | |
| the walls maintaining insulation by using a special underneath | |
| construction. However, this space-saving and simple construction has a | |
| disadvantage; the part of the shield that faces the wall such as | |
| corrosion, settling or moving of the building, or damages due to work on | |
| the exterior of the building can no longer be detected. The use of | |
| non-corrosive shield material or sufficient back ventilation of the | |
| shield protects against corrosion in these cases. The self-supporting | |
| inner shield is suspended from a supporting grid construction. This | |
| construction can be similar to a cabin construction. In the case | |
| of large rooms, such as halls, one should use a truss for statistical | |
| reasons. The self-supporting inner shield has the advantage of | |
| accessibility, although the usable room volume has been decreased. | |
| In rooms where the shield is exposed to only slight mechanical wear and | |
| tear and not required to shield completely, shielding metal foil is | |
| glued directly to the wall and welded at the contact points. | |
| The floor construction is almost the same for all four construction | |
| principles. It is important that the floor onto which the shield is | |
| placed is protected from humidity and is even. In the case of | |
| electrically insulating layers of, for instance, laminated paper or PVC | |
| are first put on the floor. The ceiling construction depends on the | |
| specific requirements and necessities. The ceiling shield can be a | |
| suspended metallic ceiling or a self-supporting ceiling construction. | |
| 3.3.3.1.2. Shield Construction Elements | |
| Construction elements which seal off viewing openings or access openings | |
| are called shield construction elements. Access openings are doors, gates, | |
| and hatches. Viewing openings are windows. | |
| The shielded doors, gates, and hatches serve two purposes: first to | |
| close off the room, and second to shield the room. | |
| The door, gate, or hatch shield is in general made of sheet iron. | |
| Passing from the door or gate shield to the room shield causes | |
| shield-technical problems. A construction which is due to the company | |
| of TRUBE & KINGS has proven to be especially effective for this kind of | |
| problem (see figure 3.3). | |
| The set-on-edge door shield, the so-called knife, is moved into a | |
| U-shape which contains spring contacts. The difference between this and | |
| other available constructions is that the knife is not moved into the | |
| spring upward. This construction reduces the wear and tear of the | |
| transition point between door and room shield and thus increases the | |
| durability of the construction which implies a better protection and | |
| higher reliability. This construction by TRUBE & KINGS satisfies the | |
| highest requirements on shield damping. | |
| Windows in shielded room are sealed off with the shielding glass or | |
| so-called honey-comb chimneys. It si understood that these windows are | |
| not to be opened. Figure 3.4 shows the cross-section of a glass | |
| especially developed by VEGLA for data processing rooms. The glass | |
| consists of multiple layers which are worked into a very fine metallic | |
| net and an evaporated metallic layer. The thickness of the wire is in | |
| the range of a few micrometers so that the net is hardly visible. This | |
| glass can also be manufactured so that it is rupture- and fire-resistant | |
| and bullet-proofed. | |
| Using glass one can reach shield dampings in the medium range (refer to | |
| figure 3.1). Specially manufactured glass reaches even higher shield | |
| dampings. | |
| Figure 3.4 also shows the so-called honey-comb chimneys as manufactured | |
| by SIEMENS. Visibility and the comfort of light are highly restricted. | |
| But the advantage is that this type of shielding satisfies the | |
| requirements for highest shield damping. | |
| 3.3.3.2. Interlocking | |
| All non-electric supply lines leaving a shielded room must be | |
| interlocked in order to protect against the propagation of shell and | |
| surface waves. Water pipes, heating pipes, pneumatic and hydraulic | |
| pipes are connected via rings to the metallic shield. Depending on the | |
| required frequency range, the pipe diameter is also subdivided by filter | |
| pieces. At high frequencies on can achieve dampings of up to 100dB | |
| using such interlocking devices. | |
| The ventilation of shielded rooms may cause problems. Problems will | |
| occur if shield dampings up to the highest frequencies are required. In | |
| this case one has to use two-step ventilation filters. The first step | |
| consist of adding concave conductor filters which work for the | |
| frequencies up to 200 GHz, the second step of adding absorber filters | |
| which protect against compromising emitted frequencies above 200 GHz. | |
| Figure 3.5 shows the set-up for the above-described ventilation lock | |
| which is due to the SCHORCH. | |
| 3.3.3.3. Electric Filters | |
| Filters must be put on electric power supply lines, telephone wires, and | |
| data processing supply lines at the room exit point. The filters have | |
| to be installed at the shield. | |
| The filters used here are the same as the ones shown in the area of | |
| electromagnetic compatibility. | |
| 4. Summary | |
| Electric devices used in data processing, data transmission and data | |
| handling emit electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetic shell and | |
| surface waves, and currents and voltages in power supply lines, | |
| telephone wires, and data supply lines. | |
| If this emitted radiation carries actual data or information from the | |
| data processing device then it is compromising. | |
| Using a television receiver, it is very easy to receive, decode and make | |
| these compromising emissions legibly. Several possibilities present | |
| themselves as protective measures against compromising emissions from | |
| data processing and data transmitting equipment. The use of shielding | |
| in the form of room shields, interlocking of supply lines, and filters | |
| for electric lines is the best protection for the user of data | |
| processing, data transmitting, and data handling equipment. |